This application is the National Stage of PCT/DE2014/100032 filed on Feb. 4, 2014, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of German Application No. 10 2013 101 179.9 filed on Feb. 6, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The invention relates to an aluminum casting alloy.
From DE 10 2008 055 928 A1, an Al casting alloy is known that contains the alloy components listed below
Proceeding from this prior art, the invention is based on the task of optimizing such a low-Si Al casting alloy with regard to its mechanical properties, in such a manner that when it is used for the production of cast components, particularly in the chassis sector of motor vehicles, material can be saved and the advantages that accompany this material saving and are known to a person skilled in the art can be achieved.
This is achieved, according to the invention, by means of an Al casting alloy that contains the alloy components listed below
Such an Al casting alloy is stronger, more impact-resistant, and more ductile as compared with the state of the art.
The selection of alloy components according to the invention, at the stated magnitude, leads to a further significant improvement in the mechanical properties, which is already recorded in the cast state, but particularly, in the case of a cast component, after two-stage heat treatment, namely solution annealing and subsequent aging, wherein preferably, quenching of the cast component in water is provided between these two heat treatment stages. For chassis applications, preferably for wheel-guiding components, very preferably for damper stilts, wheel mounts and, in particular, pivot bearings, higher mechanical characteristic values are obtained in this manner.
Completely unexpectedly, it has been shown, particularly with reference to the mechanical characteristic value of elongation to rupture A5, that the lower limit value of 0.3 wt.-% for chromium, indicated as being critical according to DE 10 2008 055 928 A1, can be lowered further, according to the invention.
The alloys according to the invention can contain production-related contaminants, for example Pb, Ni, etc., as they are generally known to a person skilled in the art.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Si is contained at a content of more than 3.1 to less than 3.7 wt.-%. It can be advantageous for specific application cases if Si is contained at a content of more than 3.3 to less than 3.7 wt.-%. For some other application cases, it can be advantageous if Si is contained at a content of more than 3.0 to less than 3.3 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Mg is contained at a content of 0.5 to 0.6 wt.-%. It can be advantageous if Mg is contained at a content of 0.5 to less than 0.6 wt.-%, preferably of 0.5 to 0.55 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Cr is contained at a content of 0.10 to less than 0.20 wt.-%. For some cases of use, it can be advantageous if Cr is contained at a content of 0.12 to 0.17 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Fe is contained at a content of 0.01 to 0.15 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Mn is contained at a content of 0.01 to 0.05 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Ti is contained at a content of 0.05 to 0.15 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Cu is contained at a content of 0.001 to 0.005 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Sr is contained at a content of 0.015 to 0.025 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Zr is contained at a content of 0.001 to 0.005 wt.-%.
For optimization of the mechanical characteristic values, it can be advantageous if Zn is contained at a content of 0.001 to 0.005 wt.-%.
For numerous applications, it can be advantageous if contaminants are contained at a content of <0.05 wt.-%. For diverse applications, it can also be advantageous if contaminants are contained at a content of <0.005 wt.-%.
For specific cast components, it has proven to be advantageous if the Al casting alloy according to the invention is a low-pressure Al casting alloy.
Accordingly, the invention also relates to a method for the production of a cast component from an Al casting alloy as described herein and in which the low-pressure casting method is used.
For specific cast components, it has proven to be advantageous if the Al casting alloy according to the invention is a counter-pressure (CPC) Al casting alloy.
Accordingly, the invention also relates to a method for the production of a cast component from an Al casting alloy as described herein and in which the low-pressure/counter-pressure casting method is used.
Fundamentally, various permanent mold casting methods are suitable as production methods for cast components, particularly as chassis parts, preferably as wheel-guiding parts, very preferably as damper stilts, wheel mounts or pivot bearings of motor vehicles, composed of the casting alloy according to the invention. Because of the very good mechanical properties in the case of wheel-guiding parts of motor vehicles subjected to great stress, however, low-pressure chill casting and the low-pressure/counter-pressure casting method (CPC method), which is also called the counter-pressure chill casting method, are particularly suitable as production methods.
Squeeze casting, gravity chill casting or die-casting, particularly thixo, rheo, or low-pressure sand-casting, can be used as production methods for cast components, particularly as chassis parts, preferably as wheel-guiding parts, very preferably as damper stilts, wheel mounts or pivot bearings of motor vehicles, composed of the casting alloy according to the invention.
In order to achieve the advantages mentioned above or to develop them even further, it is advantageous if the cast components are subjected to two-stage heat treatment, namely solution annealing and subsequent heat aging. It can be advantageous if the cast component is quenched in water between the two heat treatment stages.
It can be practical if the cast component, after the casting process, is solution-annealed between 530° C. and 550° C. for 6 to 10 h, preferably between 540° C. and 550° C. for 7 to 9 h, particularly for 8 to 9 h, very particularly preferably between more than 540° C. and 550° C. for 7 to 9 h, particularly for 8 to 9 h.
It can be practical if the cast component, after the casting process, is tempered between 180° C. and 210° C. for 1 to 8 h, particularly for 1 to 6.5 h, preferably between 180° C. and 190° C. for 1 to 6.5 h, particularly for 4 to 6.5 h, particularly preferably between 180° C. and less than 190° C. for 4 to 6.5 h, particularly for 5 to 6.5 h.
The invention furthermore provides for the use of an Al casting alloy according to one of the claims or of a particularly heat-treated component according to one of the claims, for chassis parts of motor vehicles, preferably for wheel-guiding components of motor vehicles, very particularly preferably for damper stilts, wheel mounts or pivot bearings of motor vehicles.
According to the invention, the cast components have an improved strength/elongation ratio with improved structural properties. The casting method allows a cast piece that is free of large defects, known as cavities, for one thing, and for another thing, the microstructure is positively influenced in such a manner that the internal notches that reduce elongation to rupture are kept as low as possible.
As has already been mentioned, the Al casting alloy according to the invention has proven to be particularly suitable for components that are subject to greater stress, such as damper stilts, wheel mounts or pivot bearings. Low-pressure/counter-pressure chill casting (CPC method) is used as a very particularly preferred method for the production of such components subjected to greater stress.
Cast components according to the invention, which are produced from an Al casting alloy according to one of the claims and/or according to a method according to one of the claims are characterized, after heat treatment, by a tensile yield strength Rp0.2 of 300 to 325 MPa, preferably of 305 to 310 MPa, and/or an elongation to rupture A5 of 4 to 10%, preferably of 7 to 9%, and/or a tensile strength Rm of 350-375 MPa, preferably of 350-360 MPa.
To determine the mechanical properties of the alloy AlSi3Mg0.5Cr0.15, what is called a “French test rod” is removed, according to DIN 50125, from a pivot bearing produced by means of a counter-pressure chill casting method (CPC method), wherein the pivot bearing previously received a heat treatment (solution annealing 540° C. for 8 h, quenching in water, hot aging 180° C. for 6.5 h). Casting of comparison samples (AlSi3Mg0.5 and AlSi3Mg0.5Cr0.3) and the subsequent heat treatment take place under the same conditions. The alloys to be compared differ only in terms of their chromium content. The sample rod is taken at the same location of the pivot bearing. The mechanical properties of tensile strength Rm, tensile yield strength Rp0.2, and elongation to rupture A5 are determined according to DIN 10002.
Against the background of DE 10 2008 055 928 A1 and the lower limit value for chromium of 0.3 wt.-% that was indicated as being critical with regard to the mechanical characteristic values, it could not be expected that the mechanical characteristic values indicated above for AlSi3Mg0.5Cr0.15 could be reached.
It can furthermore be advantageous if the chassis part, preferably the damper stilt or the wheel support, is produced by means of low-pressure sand casting or preferably by means of counter-pressure chill casting (CPC). Use of the casting apparatus disclosed in DE 10 2010 026 480 A1 and of the method disclosed there has proven to be particularly advantageous. The disclosure content of DE 10 2010 026 480 A1 and its content are being explicitly incorporated or integrated into the present application, by explicit reference, as belonging to the object of the present application.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2013 101 179 | Feb 2013 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/DE2014/100032 | 2/4/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/121785 | 8/14/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2943368 | Peras | Jul 1960 | A |
| 4153100 | Balevski | May 1979 | A |
| 4671342 | Balevski et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4791977 | Chandley | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4825772 | Jeffreys | May 1989 | A |
| 4825775 | Stein et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4961455 | Redemske et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5230379 | Voss | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5280957 | Hentschel et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5398750 | Crepeau et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5482321 | Soeffge et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5582659 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5601135 | Merrill | Feb 1997 | A |
| 6132531 | Fang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 8083244 | Buschjohann et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8286319 | Stolle et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8302979 | Buschjohann et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8333395 | Buschjohann et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8403347 | Eickmann et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8783331 | Heinecke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 20040045638 | Garat et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20050155676 | Cosse | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224145 | Laslaz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20070125460 | Lin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080296812 | Jung et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090051154 | Eickmann et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20100038893 | Stolle et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163137 | Wuerker et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288401 | Hennings et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289239 | Buschjohann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100289240 | Buschjohann et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110116966 | Kawahara et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120104739 | Buschjohann et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120119461 | Heinecke et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120222783 | Brinkman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130033017 | Buschjohann et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130168939 | Buschjohann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130175780 | Eickmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101 855 124 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 102 089 450 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 1 178 979 | Oct 1964 | DE |
| 34 22 121 | Dec 1985 | DE |
| 10 2006 039 684 | Feb 2008 | DE |
| 20 2008 017 274 | Apr 2009 | DE |
| 10 2008 055 928 | Aug 2009 | DE |
| 10 2009 012 073 | Sep 2010 | DE |
| 10 2010 026 480 | Mar 2011 | DE |
| 0 221 196 | May 1987 | EP |
| 0 253 692 | Jan 1988 | EP |
| 0 398 168 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 564 774 | May 1998 | EP |
| 1 270 114 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1 304 280 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1 386 827 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1 413 636 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1 733 823 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1 787 894 | May 2007 | EP |
| 989 353 | Apr 1965 | GB |
| 1 471 882 | Apr 1977 | GB |
| 54-013407 | Jan 1979 | JP |
| 61-235042 | Oct 1986 | JP |
| 7-109536 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| 10-110231 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2002-047524 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-047524 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2003-170263 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2004-238739 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2004-536223 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2006-161103 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2006-322062 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2009-506215 | Feb 2009 | JP |
| 2010-018875 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2011-502853 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 2011-505285 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| 2011-162883 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 0226548 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 2007025528 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2007031060 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| 2009059591 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009059592 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009059593 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2011003387 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011003388 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2012059078 | May 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| English Abstract and English Machine Translation of Kametani et al. (JP 2002-047524) (Feb. 15, 2002). |
| International Search Report of PCT/DE2008/001816, dated Jun. 23, 2009. |
| English translation of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of PCT/DE2008/001816, dated Jun. 10, 2010. |
| John E. Hatch, “Aluminium Properties and Physical Metallurgy,” 1984, American Society for Metals, US, Ohio, pp. 340-349, XP-002524400. |
| International Search Report of PCT/DE2014/100032, dated May 20, 2014. |
| D. H. Herring. “Heat treating of aluminum castings.” IndustrialHeating.com Feb. 2010, 22 and 24. |
| DIN 50125:2009-07, Jul. 2009. |
| DIN EN ISO 6892-1:2009, Dec. 2009. |
| International Search Report of PCT/DE2012/100278, dated Jan. 14, 2014. |
| DIN EN 10 002, 1990-1991, total of 29 pages. |
| International Search Report of PCT/DE2012/000240, dated Aug. 22, 2012, four pages. |
| Würker, L. et al., “Radführende Bauteile, hergestellt im CPC-Verfahren,” vol. 92, No. 9, Jan. 1, 2005, pp. 30-35, XP009139013, ISSN: 0016-9765. |
| English translation of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority of PCT/DE2010/000780, dated Jan. 19, 2012, twelve pages. |
| International Search Report of PCT/DE2010/000780, dated Dec. 2, 2010, three pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150307969 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |