Patent Grant
10202442
The present invention relates to the detection and treatment of lung cancer. The present invention also relates to the detection and treatment of lymphomas. The invention involves use of a binding member that binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin, especially a binding member that binds domain ED-A of fibronectin.
Angiogenesis describes the growth of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels and is a rare event in the adult but is a characteristic feature of many diseases, including the growth of solid tumors. Angiogenesis is required for tumours to grow beyond a few millimeters in diameter and tumours can induce angiogenesis through the secretion of various growth factors, e.g. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). The new blood vessels formed as the result of angiogenesis are referred to as the neovasculature of the tumour, and a vigorous neovasculature is a characteristic feature of an aggressive tumour.
Fibronectin (FN) is a glycoprotein and is widely expressed in a variety of normal tissues and body fluids. It is a component of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and plays a role in many biological processes, including cellular adhesion, cellular migration, haemostasis, thrombosis, wound healing, tissue differentiation and oncogenic transformation.
Different FN isoforms are generated by alternative splicing of three regions (ED-A, ED-B, IIICS) of the primary transcript FN pre-mRNA, a process that is modulated by cytokines and extracellular pH (Balza 1988; Carnemolla 1989; Borsi 1990; Borsi 1995). Fibronectin contains two type-III globular extra-domains which may undergo alternative splicing: ED-A and ED-B (ffrench-Constant 1995, Hynes 1990, Kaspar et al. 2006). The ED-As of mouse fibronectin and human fibronectin are 96.7% identical (only 3 amino acids differ between the two 90 amino acid sequences, see
Expression of the ED-A of fibronectin has been reported in tumour cells and in solid tumours at the mRNA level in breast cancer (Jacobs et al. 2002, Matsumoto et al. 1999) and liver cancer (Oyama et al. 1989, Tavian et al. 1994) and at the level of isolated protein in fibrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and melanoma (Borsi et al. 1987).
At the immunohistochemical level, the presence of ED-A has been detected in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of odontogenic tumours (Heikinheimo et al. 1991) and hepatocellular carcinoma (Koukoulis et al. 1995). In contrast, ED-A has been detected in the stroma of malignant breast neoplasms (Koukoulis et al. 1993), and in the blood vessels and basement membranes of well-differentiated renal cell carcinoma (Lohi et al. 1995). However, in less-differentiated renal cell carcinoma (Lohi et al. 1995) and papillary carcinoma of the thyroid (Scarpino et al. 1999) ED-A has been detected in the blood vessels, basement membranes and tumour stroma. The presence of ED-A in the vasculature of gliomas has also been reported (Borsi et al. 1998). Thus, the pattern of ED-A expression reported for different types of tumours is highly variable.
We show herein that ED-A is selectively expressed in the neovasculature of lung tumours, including tumours of small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. As tumour blood vessels are readily accessible for intravenously-administered therapeutic agents (Neri and Bicknell 2005, Rybak et al. 2006, Thorpe 2004, Trachsel and Neri 2006), binding molecules such as antibody molecules that bind the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin represent novel agents which may be used for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lung cancer, including small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.
In addition, we show herein that ED-A is selectively expressed in the neovasculature of lymphomas. As tumour blood vessels are readily accessible for intravenously-administered therapeutic agents (Neri and Bicknell 2005, Rybak et al. 2006, Thorpe 2004, Trachsel and Neri 2006), binding molecules such as antibody molecules that bind the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin represent novel agents which may be used for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lymphomas.
The therapy of tumour neo-vasculature (tumour vascular targeting) is a promising approach for the treatment of tumours. Tumour vascular targeting aims at disrupting the vasculature within the tumour itself, reducing blood flow to deprive the tumour of oxygen and nutrients, causing tumour cell death.
Provided herein are anti-ED-A antibodies which selectively recognize the new forming blood vessels of lung tumours, including small cell lung tumours, and non-small cell lung tumours.
Further provided herein are anti-ED-A antibodies which selectively recognize the new forming blood vessels of lymphomas.
This invention provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the Extra Domain-A (ED-A) isoform of fibronectin (A-FN), for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lung cancer. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lung cancer.
This invention provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the Extra Domain-A (ED-A) isoform of fibronectin (A-FN), for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of a lymphoma. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of a lymphoma.
The invention further provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin for delivery, to the neovasculature of a lung tumour, of a molecule conjugated to the binding member. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for delivery, to the neovasculature of a lung tumour, of a molecule conjugated to the binding member. The binding member may be used for the manufacture of a medicament for delivery of such a molecule.
The invention further provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin for delivery, to the neovasculature of a lymphoma, of a molecule conjugated to the binding member. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for delivery, to the neovasculature of a lymphoma, of a molecule conjugated to the binding member. The binding member may be used for the manufacture of a medicament for delivery of such a molecule.
The invention provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing lung cancer. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing lung cancer.
The invention provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing a lymphoma. The invention also provides the use of a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, that binds the ED-A of fibronectin for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing a lymphoma.
The invention further provides a method of detecting or diagnosing lung cancer in a human or animal comprising the steps of:
(a) administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A of fibronectin, and
(b) determining the presence or absence of the binding member in the lung of the human or animal body;
wherein localisation of the binding member to the lung indicates the presence of lung cancer.
The invention further provides a method of detecting or diagnosing a lymphoma in a human or animal comprising the steps of:
(a) administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin, and
(b) determining the presence or absence of the binding member in the lymphatic system of the human or animal body;
wherein localisation of the binding member to the lymphatic system in the human or animal indicates the presence of a lymphoma.
The present invention provides a method of treating lung cancer in an individual comprising administering to the individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin. The present invention also provides a method of treating lung cancer in an individual comprising administering to the individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A of fibronectin.
The present invention provides a method of treating a lymphoma in an individual comprising administering to the individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin. The present invention also provides a method of treating a lymphoma in an individual comprising administering to the individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A of fibronectin.
The invention provides a method of delivering a molecule to the neovasculature of a lung tumour in a human or animal comprising administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin, wherein the binding member is conjugated to the molecule. The invention also provides a method of delivering a molecule to the neovasculature of a lung tumour in a human or animal comprising administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule which binds the ED-A of fibronectin, wherein the binding member is conjugated to the molecule.
The invention provides a method of delivering a molecule to the neovasculature of a lymphoma in a human or animal comprising administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin, wherein the binding member is conjugated to the molecule. The invention also provides a method of delivering a molecule to the neovasculature of a lymphoma in a human or animal comprising administering to the human or animal a binding member, e.g. an antibody molecule which binds the ED-A of fibronectin, wherein the binding member is conjugated to the molecule.
A binding member for use in the invention may be an antibody which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin, comprising one or more complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9, or variants thereof. Preferably, a binding member for use in the invention is an antibody which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin, comprising one or more complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of antibody B2, C5, D5, C8, F8, B7 or G9, or variants thereof. Most preferably, a binding member for use in the invention is an antibody which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin, comprising one or more complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of antibody F8 or variants thereof.
A binding member for use in the invention may comprise a set of H and/or L CDRs of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9, or a set of H and/or L CDRs of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9 with ten or fewer, e.g. one, two, three, four, or five, amino acid substitutions within the disclosed set of H and/or L CDRs. Preferably, a binding member for use in the invention comprises a set of H and/or L CDRs of antibody B2, C5, D5, C8, F8, B7 or G9 with ten or fewer, e.g. one, two, three, four, or five, amino acid substitutions within the disclosed set of H and/or L CDRs. Preferably, a binding member for use in the invention comprises a set of H and/or L CDRs of antibody F8 with ten or fewer, e.g. one, two, three, four, or five, amino acid substitutions within the disclosed set of H and/or L CDRs.
Substitutions may potentially be made at any residue within the set of CDRs, and may be within CDR1, CDR2 and/or CDR3.
For example, a binding member for use in the invention may comprise one or more CDRs as described herein, e.g. a CDR3, and optionally also a CDR1 and CDR2 to form a set of CDRs.
A binding member for use in the invention may also comprise an antibody molecule, e.g. a human antibody molecule. The binding member normally comprises an antibody VH and/or VL domain. VH domains of binding members are also provided for use in the invention. Within each of the VH and VL domains are complementarity determining regions, (“CDRs”), and framework regions, (“FRs”). A VH domain comprises a set of HCDRs, and a VL domain comprises a set of LCDRs. An antibody molecule may comprise an antibody VH domain comprising a VH CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 and a framework. It may alternatively or also comprise an antibody VL domain comprising a VL CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 and a framework. The VH and VL domains and CDRs of antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 are described herein. All VH and VL sequences, CDR sequences, sets of CDRs and sets of HCDRs and sets of LCDRs disclosed herein represent embodiments of a binding member for use in the invention. As described herein, a “set of CDRs” comprises CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3. Thus, a set of HCDRs refers to HCDR1, HCDR2 and HCDR3, and a set of LCDRs refers to LCDR1, LCDR2 and LCDR3. Unless otherwise stated, a “set of CDRs” includes HCDRs and LCDRs.
A binding member for use in the invention may comprise an antibody VH domain comprising complementarity determining regions HCDR1, HCDR2 and HCDR3 and a framework, wherein HCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 3, 23, 33, 43, 53, 63, 73, 83, 93, 103 or 113, and wherein optionally HCDR2 is SEQ ID NO: 4 and/or HCDR3 is SEQ ID NO: 5. Preferably, the HCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 23, 33, 43, 53, 73, 83 or 103. Most preferably, the HCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 83.
Typically, a VH domain is paired with a VL domain to provide an antibody antigen-binding site, although as discussed further below a VH or VL domain alone may be used to bind antigen. Thus, a binding member for use in the invention may further comprise an antibody VL domain comprising complementarity determining regions LCDR1, LCDR2 and LCDR3 and a framework, wherein LCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 6, 26, 36, 46, 56, 66, 76, 86, 96, 106 or 116 and wherein optionally LCDR2 is SEQ ID NO: 7 and/or LCDR3 is SEQ ID NO: 8. Preferably, the LCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 26, 36, 46, 56, 76, 86 or 106. Most preferably, the LCDR1 is SEQ ID NO: 86.
A binding member for use in the invention may be an isolated antibody molecule for the ED-A of fibronectin, comprising a VH domain and a VL domain, wherein the VH domain comprises a framework and a set of complementarity determining regions HCDR1, HCDR2 and HCDR3 and wherein the VL domain comprises complementarity determining regions LCDR1, LCDR2 and LCDR3 and a framework, and wherein
HCDR1 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 3, 23, 33, 43, 53, 63, 73, 83, 93, 103 or 113,
HCDR2 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 4,
HCDR3 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 5,
LCDR1 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 6, 26, 36, 46, 56, 66, 76, 86, 96, 106 or 116;
LCDR2 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 7; and
LCDR3 has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 8.
One or more CDRs or a set of CDRs of an antibody may be grafted into a framework (e.g. human framework) to provide an antibody molecule for use in the invention. Framework regions may comprise human germline gene segment sequences. Thus, the framework may be germlined, whereby one or more residues within the framework are changed to match the residues at the equivalent position in the most similar human germline framework. A binding member for use in the invention may be an isolated antibody molecule having a VH domain comprising a set of HCDRs in a human germline framework, e.g. DP47. Normally the binding member also has a VL domain comprising a set of LCDRs, e.g. in a human germline framework. The human germline framework of the VL domain may be DPK22.
A VH domain for use in the invention may have amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 1, 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, 91, 101 or 111. Preferably, a VH domain for use in the invention has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 21, 31, 41, 51, 71, 81 or 101. Most preferably, a VH domain for use in the invention has amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 81. A VL domain for use in the invention may have the amino acid SEQ ID NO: 2, 22, 32, 42, 52, 62, 72, 82, 92, 102 or 112. Preferably, a VL domain for use in the invention has amino acid SEQ ID NO: 22, 32, 42, 52, 72, 82 or 102. Most preferably, a VL domain for use in the invention has amino acid SEQ ID NO: 82.
A binding member for use in the invention may be a single chain Fv (scFv), comprising a VH domain and a VL domain joined via a peptide linker. The skilled person may select an appropriate length and sequence of linker, e.g. at least 5 or 10 amino acids in length, up to about 15, 20 or 25 amino acids in length. The linker may have the amino acid sequence GSSGG (SEQ ID NO: 28). The scFv may consist of or comprise amino acid sequence SEQ ID NO: 9.
Alternatively, a binding member for use in the invention may comprise an antigen-binding site within a non-antibody molecule, normally provided by one or more CDRs e.g. a set of CDRs in a non-antibody protein scaffold. Binding members, including non-antibody and antibody molecules, are described in more detail elsewhere herein.
A binding member for use in the invention may be conjugated to a molecule that has biocidal or cytotoxic activity. Alternatively, a binding member for use in the invention may be conjugated to a radioisotope. As a further alternative, a binding member for use in the invention may be labelled with a detectable label.
These and other aspects of the invention are described in further detail below.
Fibronectin is an antigen subject to alternative splicing, and a number of alternative isoforms of fibronectin are known, as described elsewhere herein. Extra Domain-A (EDA or ED-A) is also known as ED, extra type III repeat A (EIIIA) or EDI. The sequence of human ED-A has been published by Kornblihtt et al. (1984), Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 5853-5868 and Paolella et al. (1988), Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 3545-3557. The sequence of human ED-A is also available on the SwissProt database as amino acids 1631-1720 (Fibronectin type-III 12; extra domain 2) of the amino acid sequence deposited under accession number P02751. The sequence of mouse ED-A is available on the SwissProt database as amino acids 1721-1810 (Fibronectin type-III 13; extra domain 2) of the amino acid sequence deposited under accession number P11276.
The ED-A isoform of fibronectin (A-FN) contains the Extra Domain-A (ED-A). The sequence of the human A-FN can be deduced from the corresponding human fibronectin precursor sequence which is available on the SwissProt database under accession number P02751. The sequence of the mouse A-FN can be deduced from the corresponding mouse fibronectin precursor sequence which is available on the SwissProt database under accession number P11276. The A-FN may be the human ED-A isoform of fibronectin. The ED-A may be the Extra Domain-A of human fibronectin.
ED-A is a 90 amino acid sequence which is inserted into fibronectin (FN) by alternative splicing and is located between domain 11 and 12 of FN (Borsi et al., 1987, J. Cell Biol., 104, 595-600). ED-A is mainly absent in the plasma form of FN but is abundant during embryogenesis, tissue remodelling, fibrosis, cardiac transplantation and solid tumour growth.
Alternative Splicing
Alternative splicing refers to the occurrence of different patterns of splicing of a primary RNA transcript of DNA to produce different mRNAs. After excision of introns, selection may determine which exons are spliced together to form the mRNA. Alternative splicing leads to production of different isoforms containing different exons and/or different numbers of exons. For example one isoform may comprise an additional amino acid sequence corresponding to one or more exons, which may comprise one or more domains.
Lymphoma
This describes a type of cancer that involves cells of the immune system called lymphocytes and is characterised by an abnormal proliferation of these cells. There are many different subtypes of lymphomas and these can be grouped into two major categories: Hodgkin's lymphomas and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Hodgkin's lymphomas develop from a specific abnormal B lymphocyte lineage, while non-Hodgkin's lymphomas may derive from either abnormal B, T or NK cells and are distinguished by unique genetic markers. Burkitt's lymphoma is an example of a B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A lymphoma as referred to herein may be a primary lymphoma. A lymphoma as referred to herein may be a Hodgkin's lymphoma or a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Preferably, a lymphoma as referred to herein is a primary Hodgkin's lymphoma or a primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Lung Cancer
This describes a malignant transformation and expansion of lung tissue. Lung cancers can be grouped into two main categories: small cell lung cancers (small cell carcinoma) and non-small cell lung cancers. The subtypes of non-small cell lung cancers are squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma (adeno-carcinoma) and large cell carcinoma. Bronchioalveolar carcinoma is a subtype of adenocarcinoma. Lung cancer as referred to herein may be primary lung cancer. A lung tumour is a tumour in the lung of an animal (e.g. a human), which is the result of lung cancer. A lung tumour as referred to herein may be a primary lung tumour.
Primary Tumour
This describes a tumour at the site where the tumour first arose (the primary site). Primary tumours sometimes spread from their original site (the primary site) to form secondary tumours (metastases) in other sites in the animal body and this spread is referred to as metastasis.
Binding Member
This describes one member of a pair of molecules that bind one another. The members of a binding pair may be naturally derived or wholly or partially synthetically produced. One member of the pair of molecules has an area on its surface, or a cavity, which binds to and is therefore complementary to a particular spatial and polar organization of the other member of the pair of molecules. Examples of types of binding pairs are antigen-antibody, biotin-avidin, hormone-hormone receptor, receptor-ligand, enzyme-substrate. The present invention is concerned with antigen-antibody type reactions.
A binding member normally comprises a molecule having an antigen-binding site. For example, a binding member may be an antibody molecule or a non-antibody protein that comprises an antigen-binding site.
An antigen binding site may be provided by means of arrangement of complementarity determining regions (CDRs) on non-antibody protein scaffolds such as fibronectin or cytochrome B etc. (Haan & Maggos, 2004; Koide 1998; Nygren 1997), or by randomising or mutating amino acid residues of a loop within a protein scaffold to confer binding specificity for a desired target. Scaffolds for engineering novel binding sites in proteins have been reviewed in detail by Nygren et al. (1997). Protein scaffolds for antibody mimics are disclosed in WO/0034784, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, in which the inventors describe proteins (antibody mimics) that include a fibronectin type III domain having at least one randomised loop. A suitable scaffold into which to graft one or more CDRs, e.g. a set of HCDRs, may be provided by any domain member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. The scaffold may be a human or non-human protein. An advantage of a non-antibody protein scaffold is that it may provide an antigen-binding site in a scaffold molecule that is smaller and/or easier to manufacture than at least some antibody molecules. Small size of a binding member may confer useful physiological properties such as an ability to enter cells, penetrate deep into tissues or reach targets within other structures, or to bind within protein cavities of the target antigen. Use of antigen binding sites in non-antibody protein scaffolds is reviewed in Wess, 2004. Typical are proteins having a stable backbone and one or more variable loops, in which the amino acid sequence of the loop or loops is specifically or randomly mutated to create an antigen-binding site that binds the target antigen. Such proteins include the IgG-binding domains of protein A from S. aureus, transferrin, tetranectin, fibronectin (e.g. 10th fibronectin type III domain) and lipocalins. Other approaches include synthetic “Microbodies” (Selecore GmbH), which are based on cyclotides—small proteins having intra-molecular disulphide bonds.
In addition to antibody sequences and/or an antigen-binding site, a binding member for use in the present invention may comprise other amino acids, e.g. forming a peptide or polypeptide, such as a folded domain, or to impart to the molecule another functional characteristic in addition to ability to bind antigen. Binding members for use in the invention may carry a detectable label, or may be conjugated to a toxin or a targeting moiety or enzyme (e.g. via a peptidyl bond or linker). For example, a binding member may comprise a catalytic site (e.g. in an enzyme domain) as well as an antigen binding site, wherein the antigen binding site binds to the antigen and thus targets the catalytic site to the antigen. The catalytic site may inhibit biological function of the antigen, e.g. by cleavage.
Although, as noted, CDRs can be carried by non-antibody scaffolds, the structure for carrying a CDR or a set of CDRs will generally be an antibody heavy or light chain sequence or substantial portion thereof in which the CDR or set of CDRs is located at a location corresponding to the CDR or set of CDRs of naturally occurring VH and VL antibody variable domains encoded by rearranged immunoglobulin genes. The structures and locations of immunoglobulin variable domains may be determined by reference to Kabat 1987, and updates thereof, now available on the Internet (at immuno.bme.nwu.edu or find “Kabat” using any search engine).
By CDR region or CDR, it is intended to indicate the hypervariable regions of the heavy and light chains of the immunoglobulin as defined by Kabat et al. (1987), (Kabat 1991a, and later editions). An antibody typically contains 3 heavy chain CDRs and 3 light chain CDRs. The term CDR or CDRs is used here in order to indicate, according to the case, one of these regions or several, or even the whole, of these regions which contain the majority of the amino acid residues responsible for the binding by affinity of the antibody for the antigen or the epitope which it recognizes.
Among the six short CDR sequences, the third CDR of the heavy chain (HCDR3) has a greater size variability (greater diversity essentially due to the mechanisms of arrangement of the genes which give rise to it). It can be as short as 2 amino acids although the longest size known is 26. Functionally, HCDR3 plays a role in part in the determination of the specificity of the antibody (Segal 1974; Amit 1986; Chothia 1987; Chothia 1989; Caton 1990; Sharon 1990a; Sharon 1990b; Kabat et al., 1991b).
Antibody Molecule
This describes an immunoglobulin whether natural or partly or wholly synthetically produced. The term also covers any polypeptide or protein comprising an antibody antigen-binding site. It must be understood here that the invention does not relate to the antibodies in natural form, that is to say they are not in their natural environment but that they have been able to be isolated or obtained by purification from natural sources, or else obtained by genetic recombination, or by chemical synthesis, and that they can then contain unnatural amino acids as will be described later. Antibody fragments that comprise an antibody antigen-binding site include, but are not limited to, antibody molecules such as Fab, Fab′, Fab′-SH, scFv, Fv, dAb, Fd; and diabodies.
It is possible to take monoclonal and other antibodies and use techniques of recombinant DNA technology to produce other antibodies or chimeric molecules that bind the target antigen. Such techniques may involve introducing DNA encoding the immunoglobulin variable region, or the CDRs, of an antibody to the constant regions, or constant regions plus framework regions, of a different immunoglobulin. See, for instance, EP-A-184187, GB 2188638A or EP-A-239400, and a large body of subsequent literature. A hybridoma or other cell producing an antibody may be subject to genetic mutation or other changes, which may or may not alter the binding specificity of antibodies produced.
As antibodies can be modified in a number of ways, the term “antibody molecule” should be construed as covering any binding member or substance having an antibody antigen-binding site with the required specificity and/or binding to antigen. Thus, this term covers antibody fragments and derivatives, including any polypeptide comprising an antibody antigen-binding site, whether natural or wholly or partially synthetic. Chimeric molecules comprising an antibody antigen-binding site, or equivalent, fused to another polypeptide (e.g. derived from another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass) are therefore included. Cloning and expression of chimeric antibodies are described in EP-A-0120694 and EP-A-0125023, and a large body of subsequent literature.
Further techniques available in the art of antibody engineering have made it possible to isolate human and humanised antibodies. For example, human hybridomas can be made as described by Kontermann & Dubel (2001). Phage display, another established technique for generating binding members has been described in detail in many publications such as WO92/01047 (discussed further below) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,108, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,332, U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,743, U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,657, U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,907, U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,215, U.S. Pat. No. 5,885,793, U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,255, U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,471, U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,197, U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,447, U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,650, U.S. Pat. No. 6,492,160, U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,404 and Kontermann & Dubel (2001). Transgenic mice in which the mouse antibody genes are inactivated and functionally replaced with human antibody genes while leaving intact other components of the mouse immune system, can be used for isolating human antibodies (Mendez 1997).
Synthetic antibody molecules may be created by expression from genes generated by means of oligonucleotides synthesized and assembled within suitable expression vectors, for example as described by Knappik et al. (2000) or Krebs et al. (2001).
It has been shown that fragments of a whole antibody can perform the function of binding antigens. Examples of binding fragments are (i) the Fab fragment consisting of VL, VH, CL and CH1 domains; (ii) the Fd fragment consisting of the VH and CH1 domains; (iii) the Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single antibody; (iv) the dAb fragment (Ward 1989; McCafferty 1990; Holt 2003), which consists of a VH or a VL domain; (v) isolated CDR regions; (vi) F(ab′)2 fragments, a bivalent fragment comprising two linked Fab fragments (vii) single chain Fv molecules (scFv), wherein a VH domain and a VL domain are linked by a peptide linker which allows the two domains to associate to form an antigen binding site (Bird 1988; Huston 1988); (viii) bispecific single chain Fv dimers (PCT/US92/09965) and (ix) “diabodies”, multivalent or multispecific fragments constructed by gene fusion (WO94/13804; Holliger 1993a). Fv, scFv or diabody molecules may be stabilized by the incorporation of disulphide bridges linking the VH and VL domains (Reiter 1996). Minibodies comprising a scFv joined to a CH3 domain may also be made (Hu 1996). Other examples of binding fragments are Fab′, which differs from Fab fragments by the addition of a few residues at the carboxyl terminus of the heavy chain CH1 domain, including one or more cysteines from the antibody hinge region, and Fab′-SH, which is a Fab′ fragment in which the cysteine residue(s) of the constant domains bear a free thiol group.
Antibody fragments for use in the invention can be obtained starting from any of the antibody molecules described herein, e.g. antibody molecules comprising VH and/or VL domains or CDRs of any of antibodies described herein, by methods such as digestion by enzymes, such as pepsin or papain and/or by cleavage of the disulfide bridges by chemical reduction. In another manner, antibody fragments of the present invention may be obtained by techniques of genetic recombination likewise well known to the person skilled in the art or else by peptide synthesis by means of, for example, automatic peptide synthesizers such as those supplied by the company Applied Biosystems, etc., or by nucleic acid synthesis and expression.
Functional antibody fragments according to the present invention include any functional fragment whose half-life is increased by a chemical modification, especially by PEGylation, or by incorporation in a liposome.
A dAb (domain antibody) is a small monomeric antigen-binding fragment of an antibody, namely the variable region of an antibody heavy or light chain (Holt 2003). VH dAbs occur naturally in camelids (e.g. camel, llama) and may be produced by immunizing a camelid with a target antigen, isolating antigen-specific B cells and directly cloning dAb genes from individual B cells. dAbs are also producible in cell culture. Their small size, good solubility and temperature stability makes them particularly physiologically useful and suitable for selection and affinity maturation. A binding member of the present invention may be a dAb comprising a VH or VL domain substantially as set out herein, or a VH or VL domain comprising a set of CDRs substantially as set out herein.
As used herein, the phrase “substantially as set out” refers to the characteristic(s) of the relevant CDRs of the VH or VL domain of binding members described herein will be either identical or highly similar to the specified regions of which the sequence is set out herein. As described herein, the phrase “highly similar” with respect to specified region(s) of one or more variable domains, it is contemplated that from 1 to about 5, e.g. from 1 to 4, including 1 to 3, or 1 or 2, or 3 or 4, amino acid substitutions may be made in the CDR and/or VH or VL domain.
Bispecific or bifunctional antibodies form a second generation of monoclonal antibodies in which two different variable regions are combined in the same molecule (Holliger 1999). Their use has been demonstrated both in the diagnostic field and in the therapy field from their capacity to recruit new effector functions or to target several molecules on the surface of tumor cells. Where bispecific antibodies are to be used, these may be conventional bispecific antibodies, which can be manufactured in a variety of ways (Holliger 1993b), e.g. prepared chemically or from hybrid hybridomas, or may be any of the bispecific antibody fragments mentioned above. These antibodies can be obtained by chemical methods (Glennie 1987; Repp 1995) or somatic methods (Staerz 1986; Suresh 1986) but likewise by genetic engineering techniques which allow the heterodimerization to be forced and thus facilitate the process of purification of the antibody sought (Merchand 1998). Examples of bispecific antibodies include those of the BiTE™ technology in which the binding domains of two antibodies with different specificity can be used and directly linked via short flexible peptides. This combines two antibodies on a short single polypeptide chain. Diabodies and scFv can be constructed without an Fc region, using only variable domains, potentially reducing the effects of anti-idiotypic reaction.
Bispecific antibodies can be constructed as entire IgG, as bispecific Fab′2, as Fab′PEG, as diabodies or else as bispecific scFv. Further, two bispecific antibodies can be linked using routine methods known in the art to form tetravalent antibodies.
Bispecific diabodies, as opposed to bispecific whole antibodies, may also be particularly useful because they can be readily constructed and expressed in E. coli. Diabodies (and many other polypeptides such as antibody fragments) of appropriate binding specificities can be readily selected using phage display (WO94/13804) from libraries. If one arm of the diabody is to be kept constant, for instance, with a specificity directed against a target antigen, then a library can be made where the other arm is varied and an antibody of appropriate specificity selected. Bispecific whole antibodies may be made by alternative engineering methods as described in Ridgeway 1996.
Various methods are available in the art for obtaining antibodies against a target antigen. The antibodies may be monoclonal antibodies, especially of human, murine, chimeric or humanized origin, which can be obtained according to the standard methods well known to the person skilled in the art.
In general, for the preparation of monoclonal antibodies or their functional fragments, especially of murine origin, it is possible to refer to techniques which are described in particular in the manual “Antibodies” (Harlow and Lane 1988) or to the technique of preparation from hybridomas described by Kohler and Milstein, 1975.
Monoclonal antibodies can be obtained, for example, from an animal cell immunized against A-FN, or one of its fragments containing the epitope recognized by said monoclonal antibodies, e.g. a fragment comprising or consisting of ED-A, or a peptide fragment of ED-A. The A-FN, or one of its fragments, can especially be produced according to the usual working methods, by genetic recombination starting with a nucleic acid sequence contained in the cDNA sequence coding for A-FN or fragment thereof, by peptide synthesis starting from a sequence of amino acids comprised in the peptide sequence of the A-FN and/or fragment thereof.
Monoclonal antibodies can, for example, be purified on an affinity column on which A-FN or one of its fragments containing the epitope recognized by said monoclonal antibodies, e.g. a fragment comprising or consisting of ED-A or a peptide fragment of ED-A, has previously been immobilized. Monoclonal antibodies can be purified by chromatography on protein A and/or G, followed or not followed by ion-exchange chromatography aimed at eliminating the residual protein contaminants as well as the DNA and the LPS, in itself, followed or not followed by exclusion chromatography on Sepharose gel in order to eliminate the potential aggregates due to the presence of dimers or of other multimers. The whole of these techniques may be used simultaneously or successively.
Antigen-Binding Site
This describes the part of a molecule that binds to and is complementary to all or part of the target antigen. In an antibody molecule it is referred to as the antibody antigen-binding site, and comprises the part of the antibody that binds to and is complementary to all or part of the target antigen. Where an antigen is large, an antibody may only bind to a particular part of the antigen, which part is termed an epitope. An antibody antigen-binding site may be provided by one or more antibody variable domains. An antibody antigen-binding site may comprise an antibody light chain variable region (VL) and an antibody heavy chain variable region (VH).
Isolated
This refers to the state in which binding members for use in the invention or nucleic acid encoding such binding members, will generally be in accordance with the present invention. Thus, binding members, VH and/or VL domains of the present invention may be provided isolated and/or purified, e.g. from their natural environment, in substantially pure or homogeneous form, or, in the case of nucleic acid, free or substantially free of nucleic acid or genes of origin other than the sequence encoding a polypeptide with the required function. Isolated members and isolated nucleic acid will be free or substantially free of material with which they are naturally associated such as other polypeptides or nucleic acids with which they are found in their natural environment, or the environment in which they are prepared (e.g. cell culture) when such preparation is by recombinant DNA technology practised in vitro or in vivo. Members and nucleic acid may be formulated with diluents or adjuvants and still for practical purposes be isolated—for example the members will normally be mixed with gelatin or other carriers if used to coat microtitre plates for use in immunoassays, or will be mixed with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or diluents when used in diagnosis or therapy. Binding members may be glycosylated, either naturally or by systems of heterologous eukaryotic cells (e.g. CHO or NS0 (ECACC 85110503) cells, or they may be (for example if produced by expression in a prokaryotic cell) unglycosylated.
Heterogeneous preparations comprising antibody molecules may also be used in the invention. For example, such preparations may be mixtures of antibodies with full-length heavy chains and heavy chains lacking the C-terminal lysine, with various degrees of glycosylation and/or with derivatized amino acids, such as cyclization of an N-terminal glutamic acid to form a pyroglutamic acid residue.
One or more binding members for an antigen, e.g. the A-FN or the ED-A of fibronectin, may be obtained by bringing into contact a library of binding members according to the invention and the antigen or a fragment thereof, e.g. a fragment comprising or consisting of ED-A or a peptide fragment of ED-A and selecting one or more binding members of the library able to bind the antigen.
An antibody library may be screened using Iterative Colony Filter Screening (ICFS). In ICFS, bacteria containing the DNA encoding several binding specificities are grown in a liquid medium and, once the stage of exponential growth has been reached, some billions of them are distributed onto a growth support consisting of a suitably pre-treated membrane filter which is incubated until completely confluent bacterial colonies appear. A second trap substrate consists of another membrane filter, pre-humidified and covered with the desired antigen.
The trap membrane filter is then placed onto a plate containing a suitable culture medium and covered with the growth filter with the surface covered with bacterial colonies pointing upwards. The sandwich thus obtained is incubated at room temperature for about 16 h. It is thus possible to obtain the expression of the genes encoding antibody fragments scFv having a spreading action, so that those fragments binding specifically with the antigen which is present on the trap membrane are trapped. The trap membrane is then treated to point out bound antibody fragments scFv with colorimetric techniques commonly used to this purpose.
The position of the coloured spots on the trap filter allows to go back to the corresponding bacterial colonies which are present on the growth membrane and produced the antibody fragments trapped. Such colonies are gathered and grown and the bacteria—a few millions of them are distributed onto a new culture membrane repeating the procedures described above. Analogous cycles are then carried out until the positive signals on the trap membrane correspond to single positive colonies, each of which represents a potential source of monoclonal antibody fragments directed against the antigen used in the selection. ICFS is described in e.g. WO0246455, which is incorporated herein by reference.
A library may also be displayed on particles or molecular complexes, e.g. replicable genetic packages such bacteriophage (e.g. T7) particles, or other in vitro display systems, each particle or molecular complex containing nucleic acid encoding the antibody VH variable domain displayed on it, and optionally also a displayed VL domain if present. Phage display is described in WO92/01047 and e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,108, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,332, U.S. Pat. No. 5,733,743, U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,657, U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,907, U.S. Pat. No. 5,872,215, U.S. Pat. No. 5,885,793, U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,255, U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,471, U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,197, U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,447, U.S. Pat. No. 6,291,650, U.S. Pat. No. 6,492,160 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,404, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Following selection of binding members able to bind the antigen and displayed on bacteriophage or other library particles or molecular complexes, nucleic acid may be taken from a bacteriophage or other particle or molecular complex displaying a said selected binding member. Such nucleic acid may be used in subsequent production of a binding member or an antibody VH or VL variable domain by expression from nucleic acid with the sequence of nucleic acid taken from a bacteriophage or other particle or molecular complex displaying a said selected binding member.
An antibody VH variable domain with the amino acid sequence of an antibody VH variable domain of a said selected binding member may be provided in isolated form, as may a binding member comprising such a VH domain.
Ability to bind the A-FN or the ED-A of fibronectin or other target antigen or isoform may be further tested, e.g. ability to compete with e.g. any one of anti-ED-A antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9 for binding to the A-FN or a fragment of the A-FN, e.g. the ED-A of fibronectin.
A binding member for use in the invention may bind the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin specifically. A binding member of the present invention may bind the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with the same affinity as anti-ED-A antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9, e.g. in scFv format, or with an affinity that is better. A binding member for use in the invention may bind the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with a KD of 3×10−8 M or an affinity that is better. Preferably, a binding member for use in the invention binds the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with a KD of 2×10−8 M or an affinity that is better. More preferably, a binding member for use in the invention binds the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with a KD of 1.7×10−8 M or an affinity that is better. Yet more preferably, a binding member for use in the invention binds the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with a KD of 1.4×10−8 M or an affinity that is better. Most preferably, a binding member for use in the invention binds the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin with a KD of 3×10−9 M or an affinity that is better.
A binding member of the present invention may bind to the same epitope on A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin as anti-ED-A antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9.
A binding member for use in the invention may not show any significant binding to molecules other than the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin. In particular the binding member may not bind other isoforms of fibronectin, for example the ED-B isoform and/or the IIICS isoform of fibronectin.
Variants of antibody molecules disclosed herein may be produced and used in the present invention. The techniques required to make substitutions within amino acid sequences of CDRs, antibody VH or VL domains and binding members generally are available in the art. Variant sequences may be made, with substitutions that may or may not be predicted to have a minimal or beneficial effect on activity, and tested for ability to bind A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin and/or for any other desired property.
Variable domain amino acid sequence variants of any of the VH and VL domains whose sequences are specifically disclosed herein may be employed in accordance with the present invention, as discussed. Particular variants may include one or more amino acid sequence alterations (addition, deletion, substitution and/or insertion of an amino acid residue), may be less than about 20 alterations, less than about 15 alterations, less than about 10 alterations or less than about 5 alterations, maybe 5, 4, 3, 2 or 1. Alterations may be made in one or more framework regions and/or one or more CDRs. The alterations normally do not result in loss of function, so a binding member comprising a thus-altered amino acid sequence may retain an ability to bind A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin. For example, it may retain the same quantitative binding as a binding member in which the alteration is not made, e.g. as measured in an assay described herein. The binding member comprising a thus-altered amino acid sequence may have an improved ability to bind A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin.
Novel VH or VL regions carrying CDR-derived sequences for use in the invention may be generated using random mutagenesis of one or more selected VH and/or VL genes to generate mutations within the entire variable domain. In some embodiments one or two amino acid substitutions are made within an entire variable domain or set of CDRs. Another method that may be used is to direct mutagenesis to CDR regions of VH or VL genes.
As noted above, a CDR amino acid sequence substantially as set out herein may be carried as a CDR in a human antibody variable domain or a substantial portion thereof. The HCDR3 sequences substantially as set out herein represent embodiments of the present invention and for example each of these may be carried as a HCDR3 in a human heavy chain variable domain or a substantial portion thereof.
Variable domains employed in the invention may be obtained or derived from any germ-line or rearranged human variable domain, or may be a synthetic variable domain based on consensus or actual sequences of known human variable domains. A variable domain can be derived from a non-human antibody. A CDR sequence for use in the invention (e.g. CDR3) may be introduced into a repertoire of variable domains lacking a CDR (e.g. CDR3), using recombinant DNA technology. For example, Marks et al. (1992) describe methods of producing repertoires of antibody variable domains in which consensus primers directed at or adjacent to the 5′ end of the variable domain area are used in conjunction with consensus primers to the third framework region of human VH genes to provide a repertoire of VH variable domains lacking a CDR3. Marks et al. further describe how this repertoire may be combined with a CDR3 of a particular antibody. Using analogous techniques, the CDR3-derived sequences of the present invention may be shuffled with repertoires of VH or VL domains lacking a CDR3, and the shuffled complete VH or VL domains combined with a cognate VL or VH domain to provide binding members for use in the invention. The repertoire may then be displayed in a suitable host system such as the phage display system of WO92/01047, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, or any of a subsequent large body of literature, including Kay, Winter & McCafferty (1996), so that suitable binding members may be selected. A repertoire may consist of from anything from 104 individual members upwards, for example at least 105, at least 106, at least 107, at least 108, at least 109 or at least 1010 members.
Similarly, one or more, or all three CDRs may be grafted into a repertoire of VH or VL domains that are then screened for a binding member or binding members for the A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin.
One or more of the HCDR1, HCDR2 and HCDR3 of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9, or the set of HCDRs may be employed, and/or one or more of the X LCDR1, LCDR2 and LCDR3 of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9 or the set of LCDRs of antibody H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 or G9 may be employed.
Similarly, other VH and VL domains, sets of CDRs and sets of HCDRs and/or sets of LCDRs disclosed herein may be employed.
The A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin may be used in a screen for binding members, e.g. antibody molecules, for use in the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lung cancer. The screen may a screen of a repertoire as disclosed elsewhere herein.
The A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin may also be used in a screen for binding members, e.g. antibody molecules, for use in the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of a lymphoma. The screen may a screen of a repertoire as disclosed elsewhere herein.
A substantial portion of an immunoglobulin variable domain may comprise at least the three CDR regions, together with their intervening framework regions. The portion may also include at least about 50% of either or both of the first and fourth framework regions, the 50% being the C-terminal 50% of the first framework region and the N-terminal 50% of the fourth framework region. Additional residues at the N-terminal or C-terminal end of the substantial part of the variable domain may be those not normally associated with naturally occurring variable domain regions. For example, construction of binding members of the present invention made by recombinant DNA techniques may result in the introduction of N- or C-terminal residues encoded by linkers introduced to facilitate cloning or other manipulation steps. Other manipulation steps include the introduction of linkers to join variable domains disclosed elsewhere herein to further protein sequences including antibody constant regions, other variable domains (for example in the production of diabodies) or detectable/functional labels as discussed in more detail elsewhere herein.
Although binding members may comprise a pair of VH and VL domains, single binding domains based on either VH or VL domain sequences may also be used in the invention. It is known that single immunoglobulin domains, especially VH domains, are capable of binding target antigens in a specific manner. For example, see the discussion of dAbs above.
In the case of either of the single binding domains, these domains may be used to screen for complementary domains capable of forming a two-domain binding member able to bind A-FN and/or the ED-A of fibronectin. This may be achieved by phage display screening methods using the so-called hierarchical dual combinatorial approach as disclosed in WO92/01047, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, in which an individual colony containing either an H or L chain clone is used to infect a complete library of clones encoding the other chain (L or H) and the resulting two-chain binding member is selected in accordance with phage display techniques such as those described in that reference. This technique is also disclosed in Marks 1992.
Binding members for use in the present invention may further comprise antibody constant regions or parts thereof, e.g. human antibody constant regions or parts thereof. For example, a VL domain may be attached at its C-terminal end to antibody light chain constant domains including human Cκ or Cλ chains, e.g. Cλ. Similarly, a binding member based on a VH domain may be attached at its C-terminal end to all or part (e.g. a CH1 domain) of an immunoglobulin heavy chain derived from any antibody isotype, e.g. IgG, IgA, IgE and IgM and any of the isotype sub-classes, particularly IgG1 and IgG4. Any synthetic or other constant region variant that has these properties and stabilizes variable regions is also useful in embodiments of the present invention.
Binding members for use in the invention may be labelled with a detectable or functional label. A label can be any molecule that produces or can be induced to produce a signal, including but not limited to fluorescers, radiolabels, enzymes, chemiluminescers or photosensitizers. Thus, binding may be detected and/or measured by detecting fluorescence or luminescence, radioactivity, enzyme activity or light absorbance. Detectable labels may be attached to antibodies for use in the invention using conventional chemistry known in the art.
There are numerous methods by which the label can produce a signal detectable by external means, for example, by visual examination, electromagnetic radiation, heat, and chemical reagents. The label can also be bound to another binding member that binds the antibody for use in the invention, or to a support.
Labelled binding members, e.g. scFv labelled with a detectable label, may be used diagnostically in vivo, ex vivo or in vitro, and/or therapeutically.
For example, radiolabelled binding members (e.g. binding members conjugated to a radioisotope) may be used in radiodiagnosis and radiotherapy. Radioisotopes which may be conjugated to a binding member for use in the invention include isotopes such as 94mTc, 99mTc, 186Re, 188Re, 203Pb, 67Ga, 68Ga, 47Sc, 111In, 97Ru, 62Cu, 64Cu, 86Y, 88Y, 90Y, 121Sn, 161Tb, 153Sm, 166Ho, 105Rh, 177Lu, 123I, 124I, 125I, 131I and 18F. The preferred radioisotopes according to the invention are 99mTc, 188Re, 68Ga and 18F. The most preferred is 18F.
For example, a binding member for use in the invention labelled with a detectable label may be used to detect, diagnose or monitor lung cancer in a human or animal.
Alternatively, a binding member for use in the invention labelled with a detectable label may be used to detect, diagnose or monitor a lymphoma in a human or animal.
A binding member of the present invention may be used for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing lung cancer.
A binding member of the present invention may also be used for the manufacture of a diagnostic product for use in diagnosing a lymphoma.
The present invention provides a method of detecting or diagnosing lung cancer in a human or animal comprising the steps of:
(a) administering to the human or animal a binding member of the present invention, for example labelled with a detectable label, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin, and
(b) determining the presence or absence of the binding member in the lung of the human or animal body;
wherein localisation of the binding member to the lung in the human or animal indicates the presence of lung cancer.
The present invention also provides a method of detecting or diagnosing a lymphoma in a human or animal comprising the steps of:
(a) administering to the human or animal a binding member of the present invention, for example labelled with a detectable label, which binds the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin, and
(b) determining the presence or absence of the binding member in the lymphatic system of the human or animal body;
wherein localisation of the binding member to the lymphatic system in the human or animal indicates the presence of a lymphoma.
Where the binding member is labelled with a detectable label, the presence or absence of the detectable label may be determined by detecting the label.
A conjugate or fusion between a binding member for use in the invention and a molecule that exerts a biocidal or cytotoxic effect on target cells in the lesions and an antibody directed against an extracellular matrix component which is present in such lesions may be employed in the present invention. For example, the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule may be interleukin-2 (IL-2), doxorubicin, interleukin-12 (IL-12), Interferon-7 (IFN-7), Tumour Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) or tissue factor (preferably truncated). Such conjugates may be used therapeutically, e.g. for treatment of lymphoma as referred to herein. Alternatively, such conjugates may be used therapeutically, for treatment of lung cancer as referred to herein.
Production and use of fusions or conjugates of binding members with biocidal or cytotoxic molecules is described for example in WO01/62298, which is incorporated by reference herein.
The invention provides a method of treating lung cancer, the method comprising administering to an individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member for use in the invention.
The invention also provides a method of treating lymphoma, the method comprising administering to an individual a therapeutically effective amount of a medicament comprising a binding member for use in the invention.
The binding member may be a conjugate of (i) a molecule which exerts a biocidal or cytotoxic effect on target cells by cellular interaction and (ii) a binding member for the ED-A isoform of fibronectin and/or the ED-A of fibronectin.
The invention provides the use of a binding member for use in the invention for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of lung cancer.
The invention also provides the use of a binding member for use in the invention for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of a lymphoma.
The binding member may be a conjugated or fused to a molecule that exerts a biocidal or cytotoxic effect as described herein. The binding member may be a conjugate of (i) a molecule which exerts a biocidal or cytotoxic effect on target cells by cellular interaction and (ii) a binding member for human fibronectin according to the present invention.
Also described herein is a conjugate of (i) a molecule which exerts a biocidal or cytotoxic effect on target cells by cellular interaction and (ii) a binding member for human fibronectin according for use in the present invention. Such a conjugate preferably comprises a fusion protein comprising the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule and a said binding member, or, where the binding member is two-chain or multi-chain, a fusion protein comprising the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule and a polypeptide chain component of said binding member. Preferably the binding member is a single-chain polypeptide, e.g. a single-chain antibody molecule, such as scFv. A fusion protein comprising the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule and a single-chain Fv antibody molecule may be used in the invention.
The biocidal or cytotoxic molecule that exerts its effect on target cells by cellular interaction, may interact directly with the target cells, may interact with a membrane-bound receptor on the target cell or perturb the electrochemical potential of the cell membrane. Molecules which interact with a membrane-bound receptor include chemokines, cytokines and hormones. Compounds which perturb the electrochemical potential of the cell membrane include hemolysin, ionophores, drugs acting on ion channels. In exemplary preferred embodiments the molecule is interleukin-2, tissue factor (preferably truncated) or doxorubicin. Other embodiments may employ interleukin 12, interferon-gamma, IP-10 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α).
As discussed further below, the specific binding member is preferably an antibody or comprises an antibody antigen-binding site. Conveniently, the specific binding member may be a single-chain polypeptide, such as a single-chain antibody. This allows for convenient production of a fusion protein comprising single-chain antibody and the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule (e.g. interleukin-2 or tissue factor). An antibody antigen-binding site may be provided by means of association of an antibody VH domain and an antibody VL domain in separate polypeptides, e.g. in a complete antibody or in an antibody fragment such as Fab or diabody. Where the specific binding member is a two-chain or multi-chain molecule (e.g. Fab or whole antibody, respectively), the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule may be conjugated as a fusion polypeptide with one or more polypeptide chains in the specific binding member.
The binding member may be conjugated with the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule by means of a peptide bond, i.e. within a fusion polypeptide comprising said molecule and the specific binding member or a polypeptide chain component thereof. See Taniguchi et al. (1983) Nature 302, 305-310; MaED-A et al. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 115: 1040-1047; Devos et al. (1983) Nucl. Acids Res. 11: 4307-4323 for IL-2 sequence information useful in preparation of a fusion polypeptide comprising IL-2. Sequence information for truncated tissue factor is provided by Scarpati et al. (1987) Biochemistry 26: 5234-5238, and Ruf et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 226: 15719-15725. Other means for conjugation include chemical conjugation, especially cross-linking using a bifunctional reagent (e.g. employing DOUBLE-REAGENTS™ Cross-linking Reagents Selection Guide, Pierce).
Where slow release is desirable, e.g. where the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule is doxorubicin or other molecule which perturbs the electrochemical potential of the cell membrane, chemical conjugation may be by means of formation of a Schiff base (imine) between a primary amino group of the specific binding member (a polypeptide such as an antibody or antibody fragment) and an oxidised sugar moiety (daunosamine) of the biocidal or cytotoxic molecule such as doxorubicin.
Also described herein is an isolated nucleic acid encoding a binding member for use in the present invention. Nucleic acid may include DNA and/or RNA. A nucleic acid may code for a CDR or set of CDRs or VH domain or VL domain or antibody antigen-binding site or antibody molecule, e.g. scFv or IgG, e.g. IgG1, as defined above. The nucleotide sequences may encode the VH and/or VL domains disclosed herein.
Further described herein are constructs in the form of plasmids, vectors, transcription or expression cassettes which comprise at least one polynucleotide as described above.
A recombinant host cell that comprises one or more constructs as above are also described. A nucleic acid encoding any CDR or set of CDRs or VH domain or VL domain or antibody antigen-binding site or antibody molecule, e.g. scFv or IgG1 or IgG4 as provided, is described, as is a method of production of the encoded product, which method comprises expression from encoding nucleic acid. Expression may conveniently be achieved by culturing under appropriate conditions recombinant host cells containing the nucleic acid. Following production by expression a VH or VL domain, or binding member may be isolated and/or purified using any suitable technique, then used as appropriate.
A nucleic acid may comprise DNA or RNA and may be wholly or partially synthetic. Reference to a nucleotide sequence as set out herein encompasses a DNA molecule with the specified sequence, and encompasses a RNA molecule with the specified sequence in which U is substituted for T, unless context requires otherwise.
A method of production of an antibody VH variable domain, the method including causing expression from encoding nucleic acid is also described. Such a method may comprise culturing host cells under conditions for production of said antibody VH variable domain.
A method of production may comprise a step of isolation and/or purification of the product. A method of production may comprise formulating the product into a composition including at least one additional component, such as a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.
Systems for cloning and expression of a polypeptide in a variety of different host cells are well known. Suitable host cells include bacteria, mammalian cells, plant cells, filamentous fungi, yeast and baculovirus systems and transgenic plants and animals. The expression of antibodies and antibody fragments in prokaryotic cells is well established in the art. For a review, see for example Plückthun 1991. A common bacterial host is E. coli.
Expression in eukaryotic cells in culture is also available to those skilled in the art as an option for production of a binding member for example Chadd & Chamow (2001), Andersen & Krummen (2002), Larrick & Thomas (2001). Mammalian cell lines available in the art for expression of a heterologous polypeptide include Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, HeLa cells, baby hamster kidney cells, NS0 mouse melanoma cells, YB2/0 rat myeloma cells, human embryonic kidney cells, human embryonic retina cells and many others.
Suitable vectors can be chosen or constructed, containing appropriate regulatory sequences, including promoter sequences, terminator sequences, polyadenylation sequences, enhancer sequences, marker genes and other sequences as appropriate. Vectors may be plasmids e.g. phagemid, or viral e.g. ‘phage, as appropriate. For further details see, for example, Sambrook & Russell (2001). Many known techniques and protocols for manipulation of nucleic acid, for example in preparation of nucleic acid constructs, mutagenesis, sequencing, introduction of DNA into cells and gene expression, and analysis of proteins, are described in detail in Ausubel 1999.
A host cell may contain a nucleic acid as described herein. Such a host cell may be in vitro and may be in culture. Such a host cell may be in vivo. In vivo presence of the host cell may allow intracellular expression of a binding member for use in the present invention as “intrabodies” or intracellular antibodies. Intrabodies may be used for gene therapy.
A method comprising introducing a nucleic acid disclosed herein into a host cell is also described. The introduction may employ any available technique. For eukaryotic cells, suitable techniques may include calcium phosphate transfection, DEAE-Dextran, electroporation, liposome-mediated transfection and transduction using retrovirus or other virus, e.g. vaccinia or, for insect cells, baculovirus. Introducing nucleic acid in the host cell, in particular a eukaryotic cell may use a viral or a plasmid based system. The plasmid system may be maintained episomally or may incorporated into the host cell or into an artificial chromosome. Incorporation may be either by random or targeted integration of one or more copies at single or multiple loci. For bacterial cells, suitable techniques may include calcium chloride transformation, electroporation and transfection using bacteriophage.
The introduction may be followed by causing or allowing expression from the nucleic acid, e.g. by culturing host cells under conditions for expression of the gene. The purification of the expressed product may be achieved by methods known to one of skill in the art.
The nucleic acid may be integrated into the genome (e.g. chromosome) of the host cell. Integration may be promoted by inclusion of sequences that promote recombination with the genome, in accordance with standard techniques.
A method that comprises using a construct as stated above in an expression system in order to express a binding member or polypeptide as above is also described.
Binding members for use in the present invention are designed to be used in methods of diagnosis or treatment in human or animal subjects, e.g. human. Binding members for use in the invention may be used in diagnosis or treatment of lymphoma.
Alternatively, binding members for use in the invention may be used in diagnosis or treatment of lung cancer.
Accordingly, the invention provides methods of treatment comprising administration of a binding member as provided, pharmaceutical compositions comprising such a binding member, and use of such a binding member in the manufacture of a medicament for administration, for example in a method of making a medicament or pharmaceutical composition comprising formulating the binding member with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. Pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles are well known and will be adapted by the person skilled in the art as a function of the nature and of the mode of administration of the active compound(s) chosen.
Binding members for use in the present invention will usually be administered in the form of a pharmaceutical composition, which may comprise at least one component in addition to the binding member. Thus pharmaceutical compositions according to the present invention, and for use in accordance with the present invention, may comprise, in addition to active ingredient, a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, carrier, buffer, stabilizer or other materials well known to those skilled in the art. Such materials should be non-toxic and should not interfere with the efficacy of the active ingredient. The precise nature of the carrier or other material will depend on the route of administration, which may be oral, inhaled or by injection, e.g. intravenous.
Pharmaceutical compositions for oral administration such as for example nanobodies etc. are also envisaged in the present invention. Such oral formulations may be in tablet, capsule, powder, liquid or semi-solid form. A tablet may comprise a solid carrier such as gelatin or an adjuvant. Liquid pharmaceutical compositions generally comprise a liquid carrier such as water, petroleum, animal or vegetable oils, mineral oil or synthetic oil. Physiological saline solution, dextrose or other saccharide solution or glycols such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol or polyethylene glycol may be included.
For intravenous injection, or injection at the site of affliction, the active ingredient will be in the form of a parenterally acceptable aqueous solution which is pyrogen-free and has suitable pH, isotonicity and stability. Those of relevant skill in the art are well able to prepare suitable solutions using, for example, isotonic vehicles such as Sodium Chloride Injection, Ringer's Injection, Lactated Ringer's Injection. Preservatives, stabilizers, buffers, antioxidants and/or other additives may be employed, as required. Many methods for the preparation of pharmaceutical formulations are known to those skilled in the art. See, e.g., Robinson, 1978.
A composition may be administered alone or in combination with other treatments, concurrently or sequentially or as a combined preparation with another therapeutic agent or agents, dependent upon the condition to be treated.
A binding member for use in the present invention may be used as part of a combination therapy in conjunction with an additional medicinal component. Combination treatments may be used to provide significant synergistic effects, particularly the combination of a binding member for use in the present invention with one or more other drugs. A binding member for use in the present invention may be administered concurrently or sequentially or as a combined preparation with another therapeutic agent or agents, for the treatment of one or more of the conditions listed herein.
For example, a binding member for use in the invention may be used in combination with an existing therapeutic agent for the treatment of lymphoma.
Existing therapeutic agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas include: Rituximab; and Cytoxan, Hydroxyrubicin (Adriamycin), Oncovin (Vincristine), and Prednisone in combination (CHOP chemotherapy regimen).
Existing therapeutic agents for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphomas include: Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in combination (ABVD chemotherapy regimen).
Alternatively, a binding member for use in the invention may be used in combination with an existing therapeutic agent for the treatment of lung cancer.
Existing therapeutic agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers include: cisplatin or carboplatin, in combination with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, etoposide or vinorelbine. Existing therapeutic agents for the treatment of small cell lung cancers include: cisplatin or etoposide, either alone or in combination with carboplatin, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, vinorelbine, topotecan or irinotecan.
A binding member for use in the invention and one or more of the above additional medicinal components may be used in the manufacture of a medicament. The medicament may be for separate or combined administration to an individual, and accordingly may comprise the binding member and the additional component as a combined preparation or as separate preparations. Separate preparations may be used to facilitate separate and sequential or simultaneous administration, and allow administration of the components by different routes e.g. oral and parenteral administration.
In accordance with the present invention, compositions provided may be administered to mammals. Administration may be in a “therapeutically effective amount”, this being sufficient to show benefit to a patient. Such benefit may be at least amelioration of at least one symptom. The actual amount administered, and rate and time-course of administration, will depend on the nature and severity of what is being treated, the particular mammal being treated, the clinical condition of the individual patient, the cause of the disorder, the site of delivery of the composition, the type of binding member, the method of administration, the scheduling of administration and other factors known to medical practitioners. Prescription of treatment, e.g. decisions on dosage etc., is within the responsibility of general practitioners and other medical doctors, and may depend on the severity of the symptoms and/or progression of a disease being treated. Appropriate doses of antibody are well known in the art (Ledermann 1991 and Bagshawe 1991. Specific dosages indicated herein, or in the Physician's Desk Reference (2003) as appropriate for the type of medicament being administered, may be used. A therapeutically effective amount or suitable dose of a binding member for use in the invention can be determined by comparing its in vitro activity and in vivo activity in an animal model. Methods for extrapolation of effective dosages in mice and other test animals to humans are known. The precise dose will depend upon a number of factors, including whether the antibody is for diagnosis, prevention or for treatment, the size and location of the area to be treated, the precise nature of the antibody (e.g. whole antibody, fragment or diabody), and the nature of any detectable label or other molecule attached to the antibody. A typical antibody dose will be in the range 100 μg to 1 g for systemic applications, and 1 μg to 1 mg for topical applications. An initial higher loading dose, followed by one or more lower doses, may be administered. An antibody may be a whole antibody, e.g. the IgG1 or IgG4 isotype. This is a dose for a single treatment of an adult patient, which may be proportionally adjusted for children and infants, and also adjusted for other antibody formats in proportion to molecular weight. Treatments may be repeated at daily, twice-weekly, weekly or monthly intervals, at the discretion of the physician. Treatments may be every two to four weeks for subcutaneous administration and every four to eight weeks for intravenous administration. In some embodiments of the present invention, treatment is periodic, and the period between administrations is about two weeks or more, e.g. about three weeks or more, about four weeks or more, or about once a month. In other embodiments of the invention, treatment may be given before, and/or after surgery, and may be administered or applied directly at the anatomical site of surgical treatment.
Further aspects and embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art given the present disclosure including the following experimental exemplification.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies
The isolation of the anti-ED-B antibody fragment scFv(L19) has been previously described (Pini et al. 1998). The parent anti-ED-A antibody was isolated from the ETH-2 library using published procedures (Giovannoni, Nucleic. Acid Research, 2001, 29(5):E27). The affinity maturation of the parent anti-ED-A antibody, yielding the high affinity anti-ED-A antibodies, is described in the following section.
Affinity Maturation of the Parent Anti-ED-A Antibody
The parent anti-ED-A antibody (an ETH-2-derived antibody) was used as template for the construction of an affinity maturation library. Sequence variability in the VH CDR1 (DP47 germline) and VL CDR1 (DPK22 germline) of the library was introduced by PCR using partially degenerate primers 5′-CTGGAGCCTGGCGGACCCAGCTCATMNNMNNMNNGCTAAAGGTGAAT CCAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 17) for VH and 5′-CCAGGTTTCTGCTGGTACCAGGCTAA MNNMNNMNNGCTAACACTCTGACTGGCCCTGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 18) for VL (all oligonucleotides were purchased from Operon Biotechnologies, Cologne, Germany), in a process that generates random mutations at positions 31, 32 and 33 of the VH CDR1 and at positions 31, 31a and 32 of the VL CDR1. VHVL combinations were assembled in scFv format by PCR assembly using the primers LMB3long (5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCATGATTAC-3′) (SEQ ID NO: 19) and fdseqlong (5′-GACGTTAGTAAATGAATTTTCTGTATGAGG-3′) (SEQ ID NO: 20), using gel-purified VH and VL segments as templates. The assembled VH-VL fragments were doubly digested with NcoI/NotI and cloned into NcoI/NotI-digested pHEN1 phagemid vector (Hoogenboom et al., 1991). The resulting ligation product was electroporated into electrocompetent E. coli TG-1 cells according to (Viti et al., 2000), giving rise to a library containing 1.5×107 individual antibody clones, which was screened for antibodies which bind ED-A with improved affinity.
Selection of Anti-ED-A Antibodies
The antibody library described above was screened for antibodies which bound ED-A with a greater affinity than the parent anti-ED-A antibody using BIAcore analysis. The antigen (11A12) used in the BIAcore analysis contained the ED-A domain of human fibronectin and has the following amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 140):
The nucleotide sequence of antigen (11A12) (SEQ ID NO: 141) is as follows:
The nucleotide sequence of the antigen was amplified by PCR using primers containing BamHI and BglII restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ respectively. The resulting PCR product and the vector pQE12 (QIAGEN) were digested with BamHI and BglII restriction endonuclease and subsequently ligated in a reaction containing a ratio of insert to vector of 3:1. The resulting vector was sequenced to check that the sequence was correct.
The antigen was prepared as follows:
A TG1 electrocompetent Preculture in 10 ml 2TY, Amp, 1% Glucose was electroporated in the presence of 1 μl of a DNA miniprep of 11A12. The pre-culture was then diluted 1:100 (8 ml in 800 ml of 2TY, Amp, 0.1% Glucose) and grown to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6 and then induced with IPTG over night. The following day the cells were spun down and the supernatant filtered (Millipore 0.22 μm). After centrifugation and clarification of the culture broth, 11A12 was purified using a Hitrap column on FPLC. The Ni/column was regenerated as follows: the column was rinsed with 5 column volumes (CV) H2O followed by application of 3CV 0.5 M EDTA/0.2 M Tris pH 8 to wash the old Nickel out from the column. This was followed by rinsing of the column with 5CV H2O. The column was then reloaded with 2CV 100 mM NiSO4 followed by rinsing of the column with several CVs H2O. The column was then equilibrated with 5CV lysis buffer (20 mM imidazol/250 mM NaCl/PBS pH 7.4). The cell lysate was filtered (Millipore 0.45 μm) and loaded onto the column (manually). The column was then put back on FPLC and the lysis buffer left to flow until the UV signal was stable (constant), about 3 CV. The elution program was then started: Gradient from 0% to 100% of Elution Buffer (400 mM imidazol/250 mM NaCl/PBS pH 7.4) in 5CV. The fractions containing the eluted antigen were pooled and dialysed in PBS overnight.
Expression and Purification of the Anti-ED-A Antibodies
The anti-ED-A antibodies were expressed and purified as follows: A TG1 electrocompetent Preculture in 10 ml 2TY, Amp, 1% Glucose was electroporated in the presence of 1 μl of a DNA miniprep of one of the anti-ED-A antibodies. The pre-culture was then diluted 1:100 (8 ml in 800 ml of 2TY, Amp, 0.1% Glucose) and grown to an OD600 of 0.4-0.6 and then induced with IPTG over night. The following day the cells were spun down and the supernatant filtered (Millipore 0.22 μm). The scFv were purified on a Protein A-Sepharose column and Triethylemmine was used to elute the scFvs from the column. The fractions containing the eluted scFvs were dialysed in PBS over night at 4° C. The scFv fractions were then put on a Superdex 75 column with PBS flowing at 0.5 ml/min and 0.25 ml fractions collected. The monomeric fractions were used for BIAcore analysis.
BIAcore Analysis 1
The BIAcore Chip was flushed overnight at a flow rate of 5 μl/min with HBS-EP buffer BIACORE, 0.01 M Hepes pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% surfactant P20 (same buffer used for the assay). The antigen (11A12) was diluted to a concentration of 50 μg/ml in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) and the COOH groups on the chip were activated by injection of 50 μl of a mix of N-Hydroxy Succinimide (NHS) and ethyl-N-(dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC). 40 μl of the 11A12 antigen were injected onto the chip and the residual free COOH groups were blocked with 30 μl of ethanolamine. After a 0.22 μm filtration, 20 μl of each individual bacterial supernatant were injected onto the chip and interaction with the antigen was monitored in real time.
BIAcore Analysis 2
The kon, koff and KD of the parent anti-ED-A antibody and anti-ED-A antibodies B2, C5, D5, C8, F8, B7 and G9 were evaluated using Surface Plasmon Resonance. The chip was equilibrated over night with the same buffer used during the assay at a buffer flow rate of 5 μl/min. The whole coating procedure was performed at this flow rate. The antigen 11A12 was diluted 1:25 with acetate buffer pH 4.00 (provided by BIACORE) to a final concentration of 20 μg/ml. The NHS and EDC were then mixed and 50 μl injected to activate the COOH groups on the CM5 chip. This was followed by injection of 40 μl of the antigen (this lasts about 40″). Then 30 μl of Ethanolamine were injected in order to block the reactivity of eventual free COOH.
Each sample was assayed at a flow rate 20 μl/min. 20 μl of undiluted monomeric protein (as it comes out from the gel filtration) was injected. The dissociation time was left to run for about 200″. Then 10 μl of HCl 10 mM was injected to regenerate the chip. The injection of monomeric protein was repeated at different dilutions, i.e. 1:2 dilution (in PBS) followed by regeneration with HCl. This was followed by a third injection of the protein, at a dilution of 1:4 followed again by regeneration with HCl. The kon, koff and KD values for each anti-ED-A antibody were evaluated using the BIAevaluation software.
Immunohistochemistry of Lymphoma Sections
Sections of Ramos lymphoma were fixed in cold acetone (−20° C.) for 10 minutes and the slides left to dry at room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes. The slides were then immersed in TBS for 5 to 10 minutes and the back of the slides dried with paper without touching the sections. This was followed by blocking of the sections with >100 μl of 20% Foetal Calf Serum (FCS) in TBS (50 mM TRIS, 100 mM NaCl, adjusted to pH 7.4, 0.01% Aprotinin) for 30 minutes. The blocking solution was poured off and the slides submerged in TBS for 5 minutes. 100 μl of primary antibody scFv F8 (˜20 ng/μl) carrying a myc-tag, together with 10 μl of biotinylated anti-myc antibody 9E10 (OD 0.25, diluted 1:20) diluted in TBS/3% BSA, were then added to the slides. As a negative control, a Ramos lymphoma section was immunohistochemically stained in the same way but omitting the primary antibody, i.e. the myc-tagged scFv anti-ED-A antibody F8. The slides were incubated in a moist chamber for 1 hour. The slides were washed with TBS followed by the addition of Streptavidin-Alkaline Phosphatase diluted 1:150 in TBS/3% BSA and incubation in a moist chamber for 30 minutes. The slides were then washed with TBS twice for 5 minutes and the back of the slides dried with paper. 500 μl of the Fast Red substrate (5 mg FastRed powder added to 5 ml Fast Red solution [49 ml TRIS-HCl, 0.1M, pH 8.2; 1.0 ml N,N-dimethylformamide; 10 mg Naphthol AS-MX Phosphate and 50 μl Levamisole solution (1 ml 0.1 M TRIS-HCl pH 8.2, 240.8 mg Levamisole powder)] and filtered with a filter with a pore size of 0.45μ was added to each slide and the slides incubated in a moist chamber for 15 minutes. The slides were washed twice with deionised water by directly applying the deionised water onto each section with a plastic Pasteur pipette and then left in water. The slides were then transferred to a Gillis Hematoxilin solution for 50 min followed by a quick transfer to water and rinsed with water 6 times. Finally, the slides were mounted with Glycergel (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) mounting medium and analyzed with an Axiovert 5100 TV microscope (Carl Zeiss, Feldbach, Switzerland) using the Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss).
Immunohistochemistry Staining of Lung Cancer Sections
Sections of a small cell lung cancer (small cell carcinoma) and of several non-small cell lung cancers (squamous cell carcinoma, adeno-carcinoma, bronchio-alveolar carcinoma and large cell carcinoma) were immunohistochemically stained with an scFv anti-ED-A antibody carrying a myc-tag, as previously described (see e.g., Brack et al. 2006). In brief, the sections were incubated with the scFv anti-EDA antibody D5 (final concentration, 2-15 μg/mL) and with the secondary antibody (monoclonal anti-myc antibody 9E10) simultaneously. Bound antibodies were detected with rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (Dakocytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) followed by mouse monoclonal alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase complex (Dakocytomation). Fast Red (Sigma) was used as phosphatase substrate, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma). Finally, the sections were mounted with Glycergel (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) and analyzed with an Axiovert S100 TV microscope (Carl Zeiss, Feldbach, Switzerland) using the Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss).
Results
Selection of Anti-ED-A Antibodies
BIAcore Analysis 1
The BIAcore analysis produced a graph for each anti-ED-A antibody which was analysed to deduce the affinity of an antibody for the antigen as follows: The x axis of each graph corresponds to time and the y axis corresponds to Resonance Units (a measure which indicates the binding affinity of the tested antibody for the antigen coated onto the BIAcore chip). Each graph showed 3 peaks and 1 dip which correspond to changes of buffer and are therefore irrelevant for the interpretation of the results.
The ascending part of each graph represents the association phase. The steeper the curve in this part of the graph, the faster the association of the antibody with the antigen. The descending part of each graph represents the dissociation phase of the antibody from the antigen. The flatter the curve in this part of the graph is, the slower the dissociation of the antibody from the antigen.
Anti-ED-A antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 all showed a flatter dissociation curve than the parent anti-ED-A antibody from which they were derived, indicating that they bind ED-A, and hence also A-FN, with a greater affinity than the parent anti-ED-A antibody. The graphs for antibodies E5, F1, F8 and H1 showed the flattest dissociation curves of all the anti-ED-A antibodies tested. The association curves of antibodies H1, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8 and F1 were flatter than that observed for the parent anti-ED-A antibody while the association curve observed for antibodies B2, B7, E8 and G9 was as steep as the association curve observed for the parent anti-ED-A antibody. However, as bacterial supernatants of IPTG-induced E. coli TG-1 cells were used for the BIAcore analysis of antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9, the concentration of the tested antibody samples was unknown but most probably lower than the concentration of the parent anti-ED-A antibody sample used for comparison. Consequently, the association curve of antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 may be artificially low due to the low concentration of antibody in the samples used for the BIAcore analysis. However, as concentration does not significantly affect the dissociation of an antibody from its target antigen in BIAcore analysis, the flat dissociation curves observed for antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 show that these antibodies bind ED-A with at least an equal, and probably a higher affinity, than the parent anti-ED-A antibody.
BIAcore Analysis 2
The kon, koff and KD values for each anti-ED-A antibody were evaluated using the BIAevaluation software. The kon, koff and KD values of the parent anti-ED-A antibody and anti-ED-A antibodies B2, C5, D5, C8, F8, B7 and G9 for antigen 11A12 are detailed in Table 2. Anti-ED-A antibodies B2, C5, D5, C8, F8, B7 and G9 all have a better KD values for antigen 11A12 than the parent anti-ED-A antibody from which they were derived, indicating that they bind ED-A, and hence also A-FN, with a greater affinity than the parent anti-ED-A antibody.
Immunohistochemistry of Lymphoma Sections
Immunohistochemical staining of sections of primary human Ramos lymphoma (a non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma [Burkitt's lymphoma]) with anti-ED-A scFv F8 antibody showed a strong and specific staining of the neovasculature. In contrast no staining of the primary Ramos lymphoma, including the neovasculature, was detected in the negative control in which the primary Ramos lymphoma was stained under identical conditions except for the omission of the anti-ED-A scFv F8 antibody. This demonstrates that the anti-EDA scFv antibodies of the present invention are specifically targeted to the neovasculature of lymphomas. ED-A may therefore serve as a general target for binding member (e.g. antibody) based targeting strategies in lymphoma.
Immunohistochemistry of Lung Cancer Sections
It is generally difficult to find ‘pantumoral antibodies’ within a certain class of cancer, for example Herceptin® (trastuzumab) stains only 20% of breast cancers.
Sequencing
Anti-ED-A antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 are all scFv antibodies and were sequenced using conventional methods. The nucleotide sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody H1 is shown in
Preferred nucleotide sequences encoding VH and/or VL of anti-ED-A antibodies B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 are identical to nucleotide sequences encoding VH and/or VL of anti-ED-A antibody H1, except that the nucleotide sequences encoding the H1 CDR1s of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain are substituted with the nucleotide sequences encoding the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain CDR1s listed in Table 1 for the respective antibody.
The preferred nucleotide sequences encoding the VH and/or VL of anti-ED-A scFv F8 diabody are identical to the nucleotide sequences encoding VH and/or VL of anti-ED-A antibody H1, except that the nucleotide sequences encoding the H1 CDR1s of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain are substituted with the nucleotide sequences encoding the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain CDR1s listed in Table 1 for anti-ED-A antibody F8. The preferred nucleotide sequence encoding the linker linking the VH and VL of the anti-ED-A scFv F8 diabody is gggtccagtggcggt (SEQ ID NO: 29).
Anti-ED-A antibodies B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8 and G9 have identical amino acid sequences to anti-ED-A antibody H1, except that the amino acid sequences of the H1 CDR1s of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain are substituted with the amino acid sequences of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain CDR1s listed in Table 1 for the respective antibody. The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A scFv F8 diabody is identical to the amino acid sequences of anti-ED-A antibody H1, except that the amino acid sequences of the H1 CDR1s of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain are substituted with the amino acid sequences of the light (VL) and heavy (VH) chain CDR1s listed in Table 1 for anti-ED-A antibody F8, and the amino acid sequence of the linker in H1 is substituted with the linker amino acid sequence GSSGG (SEQ ID NO: 28).
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody B2 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 21) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 23 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody C5 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 41) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 43 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody D5 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 51) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 53 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody E5 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 61) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 63 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody C8 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 71) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 73 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody F8 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 81) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 83 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1. The VH domain of the anti-ED-A F8 diabody has the same amino acid sequence as VH domain of the anti-ED-A antibody F8 (i.e. SEQ ID NO: 81).
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody F1 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 91) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 93 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody B7 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 101) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 103 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody E8 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 111) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 113 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody G9 VH domain (SEQ ID NO: 31) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 33 is substituted for the VH CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody B2 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 22) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 26 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody C5 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 42) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 46 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody D5 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 52) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 56 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody E5 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 62) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 66 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody C8 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 72) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 76 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody F8 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 82) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 86 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1. The VL domain of the anti-ED-A F8 diabody has the same amino acid sequence as VL domain of the anti-ED-A antibody F8 (i.e. SEQ ID NO: 82).
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody F1 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 92) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 96 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody B7 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 102) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 106 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody E8 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 112) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 116 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
The amino acid sequence of the anti-ED-A antibody G9 VL domain (SEQ ID NO: 32) is identical to the amino acid sequence of the VL domain of anti-ED-A antibody H1 except that SEQ ID NO: 36 is substituted for the VL CDR1 of H1.
Optionally, the amino acid at position 5 of the VH domain of anti-ED-A antibodies H1, B2, C5, D5, E5, C8, F8, F1, B7, E8, G9 and the scFv F8 diabody may be a leucine residue (L) rather than a valine residue (V) as shown in
All references cited anywhere in this specification, including those cited anywhere above, are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety and for all purposes.
P R R
S A W
A A K
V A F
P I T
L H F
V M K
N A F
T G S
L A H
L Q T
L P F
L F T
M P F
Q(Amber) A R
A P F
H F D
L A F
D M H
S S F
H M Q
T A F
This is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/456,966, filed Aug. 11, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/665,930, filed Dec. 21, 2009, now abandoned, which is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2008/002536, filed Jul. 24, 2008, which was published in English under PCT Article 21(2), which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/951,765, filed Jul. 25, 2007, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5420012 | Partanen et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5859205 | Adair et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 8263041 | Rybak | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20060024724 | Hussa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024757 | Hussa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115428 | Menrad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188501 | Homma et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070082879 | Goodman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20100247541 | Rybak et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20140199238 | Kaspar et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0344134 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0580859 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 603 735 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 2280254 | Feb 2005 | RU |
| WO 2001083816 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 02057290 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 2004000216 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004067038 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004094612 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005009366 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005086612 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006026020 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006050834 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006119897 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007128563 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008120101 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009056268 | May 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adams et al., “High Affinity Restricts the Localization and Tumor Penetration of Single-Chain Fv Antibody Molecules,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, pp. 4750-4755, 2001. |
| Aguayo et al., “Angiogenesis in acute and chronic leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes,” Blood, vol. 96, No. 6, pp. 2240-2245, 2000. |
| Auerbach et al, “Angiogenesis Assays: Problems and Pitfalls Cancer and Metastasis Reviews,” Cancer Metastasis Rev., vol. 19, pp. 197-172, 2000. |
| Ballard et al., “Vascular tenascin-C regulates cardiac endothelial phenotype and neovascularization,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 717-719, 2006. |
| Balza et al., “Transforming growth factor β regulates the levels of different fibronectin isoforms in normal human cultured fibroblasts,” FEBS Letters, vol. 228, No. 1, pp. 42-44, 1988. |
| Berndorff et al., “Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis Using 99mTc-Labeled Human Recombinant Anti-ED-B Fibronectin Antibody Fragments,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 47, pp. 1707-1716, 2006. |
| Berndorff et al., “Radioimmunotherapy of Solid Tumors by Targeting Extra Domain B Fibronectin: Identification of the Best-Suited Radioimmunoconjugate,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, No. 19 Suppl., pp. 7053s-7063s, 2005. |
| Berndt et al., “Differential expression of tenascin-C splicing domains in urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder,” J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., vol. 132, pp. 537-546, 2006. |
| Berndt et al., “Evidence of ED-B+ fibronectin synthesis in human tissues by nonradioactive RNA in situ hybridization. Investigations on carcinoma (oral squamous cell and breast carcinoma), chronic inflammation (rheumatoid synovitis) and fibromatosis (Morbus Dupuytren),” Histochem. Cell Biol., vol. 109, pp. 249-255, 1998. |
| Birchler et al., “Infrared photodetection for the in vivo localisation of phage-derived antibodies directed against angiogenic markers,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 231, pp. 239-248, 1999. |
| Birchler et al., “Selective targeting and photocoagulation of ocular angiogenesis mediated by a phage-derived human antibody fragment,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, pp. 984-988, 1999. |
| Borsi et al., “Expression of Different Tenascin Isoforms in Normal, Hyperplastic and Neoplastic Human Breast Tissues,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 52, pp. 688-692, 1992. |
| Borsi et al., “Monoclonal Antibodies in the Analysis of Fibronectin Isoforms Generated by Alternative Splicing of mRNA Precursors in Normal and Transformed Human Cells,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 104, pp. 595-600, 1987. |
| Borsi et al., “Preparation of Phage Antibodies to the ED-A Domain of Human Fibronectin,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 240, pp. 244-251, 1998. |
| Borsi et al., “Selective Targeting of Tumoral Vasculature: Comparison of Different Formats of an Antibody (L19) to the ED-B Domain of Fibronectin,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 102, pp. 75-85, 2002. |
| Borsi et al., “The Alternative Splicing Pattern of the Tenascin-C Pre-mRNA is Controlled by the Extracellular pH,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, No. 11, pp. 6243-6245, 1995. |
| Borsi et al., “Transforming growth factor-β regulates the splicing pattern of fibronectin messenger RNA precursor,” FEBS Letters, vol. 261, No. 1, pp. 175-178, 1990. |
| Brack et al., “Tumor-Targeting Properties of Novel Antibodies Specific to the Large Isoform of Tenascin-C,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 3200-3208, 2006. |
| Brown et al., “Tolerance of single, but not multiple, amino acid antibody VH CDR 2: a means of minimizing B cell wastage from replacements in somatic hypermutation?” J. Immunol., pp. 3285-3291, 1996. |
| Burrows et al., “Up-Regulation of Endoglin on Vascular Endothelial Cells in Human Solid Tumors: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 1, pp. 1623-1634, 1995. |
| Carnemolla et al., “A Tumor-associated Fibronectin Isoform Generated by Alternative Splicing of Messenger RNA Precursors,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 108, pp. 1139-1148, 1989. |
| Carnemolla et al., “Enhancement of the antitumor properties of interleukin-2 by its targeted delivery to the tumor blood vessel extracellular matrix,” Blood, vol. 99, No. 5, pp. 1659-1665, 2002. |
| Carnemolla et al., “Identification of a Glioblastoma-Associated Tenascin-C Isoform by a High Affinity Recombinant Antibody,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 154, No. 5, pp. 1345-1352, 1999. |
| Carnemolla et al., “Phage Antibodies with Pan-Species Recognition of the Oncofoetal Angiogenesis Marker Fibronectin ED-B Domain,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 68, pp. 397-405, 1996. |
| Castellani et al., “The Fibronectin Isoform Containing the ED-B Oncofetal Domain: A Marker of Angiogenesis,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 59, pp. 612-618, 1994. |
| Castellani et al., “Transformed Human Cells Release Different Fibronectin Variants Than Do Normal Cells,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 103, pp. 1671-1677, 1986. |
| Castronovo et al., “A Chemical Proteomics Approach for the Identification of Accessible Antigens Expressed in Human Kidney Cancer,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 2083-2091, 2006. |
| Chevalier et al., “Presence of ED-A Containing Fibronectin in Human Articular Cartilage from Patients with Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1022-1030, 1996. |
| Chilosi et al., “Constitutive Expression of Tenascin in T-Dependent Zones of Human Lymphoid Tissues,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 143, No. 5, pp. 1348-1355, 1993. |
| Clamp et al, “The clinical potential of antiangiogenic fragments of extracellular matrix proteins,” Br. J. Cancer, vol. 93, No. 9, pp. 967-972, 2005. |
| Claudepierre et al., “Increased Ed-B fibronectin plasma levels in spondyloarthropathies: comparison with rheumatoid arthritis patients and a healthy population,” Rheumatology, vol. 38, No. 11, pp. 1099-1103, 1999. |
| Cseh et al., “Cell surface fibronectin on peripheral blood lymphocytes in normal individuals and in patients with acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Allergol. et Immunopathol. vol. 13, pp. 35-40, 1985. |
| Davies et al., “Affinity improvement of single antibody VH domains: residues in all three hypervariable regions affect antigen binding,” Immunotechnology, vol. 2, pp. 169-179, 1996. |
| Decision on Grant Patent for Invention, Russian Patent Application No. 2010121874, 7 pages (Nov. 1, 2012). |
| Demartis et al., “Selective targeting of tumour neovasculature by a radiohalogenated human antibody fragment specific for the ED-B domain of fibronectin,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med., vol. 28, pp. 534-539, 2001. |
| El-Sorady et al., “Bone Marrow Angiogenesis in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Role of VEGF,” Journal of the Egyptian Nat. Cancer Inst., vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 131-136, 2000. |
| Estey, “Modulation of angiogenesis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 623-639, 2004. |
| Extended Search Report, EP Patent Application No. 12195313.7, dated Oct. 2, 2013 (10 pages). |
| Fabbrini et al., “Selective occlusion of tumor blood vessels by targeted delivery of an antibody-photosensitizer conjugate,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 118, pp. 1805-1813, 2006. |
| Giovannoni et al., “Isolation of anti-angiogenesis antibodies from a large combinatorial repertoire by colony filter screening,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, No. 5, p. e27 (1-6), 2001. |
| Halin et al., “Tumor-targeting properties of antibody-vascular endothelial growth factor fusion proteins,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 109-116, 2002. |
| Hanahan et al., “The hallmarks of cancer,” Cell, vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 57-70, 2000. |
| Holt et al., “Domain antibodies: proteins for therapy,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 484-490, 2003. |
| Kaspar et al., “Fibronectin as target for tumor therapy,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 118, pp. 1331-1339, 2006. |
| Kato et al., “A New Type of Antimetastatic Peptide Derived from Fibronectin,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, pp. 2455-2462, 2002. |
| Kriegsmann et al., “Expression of fibronectin splice variants and oncofetal glycosylated fibronectin in the synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis,” Rheumatol. Int., vol. 24, pp. 25-33, 2004. |
| Liao et al., “The EIIIA Segment of Fibronectin is a Ligand for Integrins α9β1 and α4β1 Providing a Novel Mechanism for Regulating Cell Adhesion by Alternative Splicing,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, No. 17, pp. 14467-14474, 2002. |
| Linnala et al., “Isoforms of cellular fibronectin and tenascin in amniotic fluid,” FEBS Letters, vol. 337, pp. 167-170, 1994. |
| Luster et al., “Plasma Protein β-2-Glycoprotein 1 Mediates Interaction between the Anti-tumor Monoclonal Antibody 3G4 and Anionic Phospholipids on Endothelial Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, No. 40, pp. 29863-29871, 2006. |
| Mariani et al., “Tumor targeting potential of the monoclonal antibody BC-1 against oncofetal fibronectin in nude mice bearing human tumor implants,” Cancer, vol. 80, No. S12, pp. 2378-2384, 1997. |
| Marlind et al., “Antibody-Mediated Delivery of Interleukin-2 to the Stroma of Breast Cancer Strongly Enhances the Potency of Chemotherapy,” Clin. Cancer Res., vol. 14, No. 20, pp. 6515-6524, 2008. |
| Menrad et al., “ED-B fibronectin as a target for antibody-based cancer treatments,” Expert Opinion Ther. Targets, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 491-500, 2005. |
| Moschetta et al., “Paclitaxel Enhances Therapeutic Efficacy of the F8-IL2 lmmunocytokine to EDA-Fibronectin-Positive Metastatic Human Melanoma Xenografts,” Cancer Res, vol. 72, No. 7, pp. 1814-1824, 2012. |
| Neri et al., “Tumour Vascular Targeting,” Nature Rev. Cancer, vol. 5, pp. 436-446, 2005. |
| Niesner et al., “Quantitation of the Tumor-Targeting Properties of Antibody Fragments Conjugated to Cell-Permeating HIV-1 TAT Peptides,” Bioconjugate Chem., vol. 13, pp. 729-736, 2002. |
| Nilsson et al., “Targeted Delivery of Tissue Factor to the ED-B Domain of Fibronectin, a Marker of Angiogenesis, Mediates the Infarction of Solid Tumors in Mice,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, pp. 711-716, 2001. |
| Okamura et al., “The Extra Domain A of Fibronectin Activates Toll-like Receptor 4,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, No. 13, pp. 10229-10233, 2001. |
| Oyama et al., “Coordinate Oncodevelopmental Modulation of Alternative Splicing of Fibronectin Pre-Messenger RNA at ED-A, ED-B, and CS1 Regions in Human Liver Tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 53, pp. 2005-2011, 1993. |
| Oyama et al., “Deregulation of Alternative Splicing of Fibronectin Pre-mRNA in Malignant Human Liver Tumors,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, No. 18, pp. 10331-10334, 1989. |
| Oyama et al., “Oncodevelopmental Regulation of the Alternative Splicing of Fibronectin Pre-Messenger RNA in Human Lung Tissues,” Cancer Research, 50(4):1075-1078, 1990. |
| Padlan, “Anatomy of the antibody molecule,” Mol. Immunol., vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 169-217, 1994. |
| Padro et al., “Increased angiogenesis in the bone marrow of patients with acute myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 95, No. 8, pp. 2637-2644, 2000. |
| Paganelli et al., “Pre-targeted immunodetection in glioma patients: tumour localization and single-photon emission tomography imaging of [99mTc]PnAO-biotin,” Eur. J. Nucl. Med., vol. 21, pp. 314-321, 1994. |
| Paul, Fundamental Immunology, 3rd Edition, pp. 292-295, 1993. |
| Payne, “Progress in immunoconjugate cancer therapeutics,” Cancer Cell, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 207-212, 2003. |
| Peters et al., “Preferential Recognition of a Fragment Species of Osteoarthritic Synovial Fluid Fibronectin by Antibodies to the Alternatively Spliced EIIIA Segment,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 2572-2585, 2001. |
| Riva et al., “Local Treatment of Malignant Gliomas by Direct Infusion of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies Labeled with 131I: Comparison of the Results Obtained in Recurrent and Newly Diagnosed Tumors,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, pp. 5952s-5956s, 1995. |
| Riva et al., “Treatment of Intracranial Human Glioblastoma by Direct Intratumoral Administration of 131I-Labelled Anti-Tenascin Monoclonal Antibody BC-2,” Int. J. Cancer, vol. 51, pp. 7-13, 1992. |
| Rudikoff et al, “Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity,” Proc Natl Acad Sci., vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 1979-1983, 1982. |
| Rybak et al., “Ligand-Based Vascular Targeting of Disease,” ChemMedChem, vol. 2, pp. 22-40, 2007. |
| Rybak et al., “The Extra-domain A of Fibronectin is a Vascular Marker of Solid Tumors and Metastases,” Cancer Research, 67(22):10948-10957, 2007. |
| Santimaria et al., “Immunoscintigraphic Detection of the ED-B Domain of Fibronectin, a Marker of Angiogenesis, in Patients with Cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, pp. 571-579, 2003. |
| Scarpino et al., “Expression of EDA/EDB Isoforms of Fibronectin in Papillary Carcinoma of the Thyroid,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 188, pp. 163-167, 1999. |
| Schliemann et al., “Complete eradication of human B-cell lymphoma xenografts using rituximab in combination with the immunocytokine L19-IL2,” Blood, vol. 113, pp. 2275-2283, 2009. |
| Schliemann et al., “Three clinical-stage tumor targeting antibodies reveal differential expression of oncofetal fibronectin and tenascin-C isoforms in human lymphoma,” Leukemia Research, vol. 33, pp. 1718-1722, 2009. |
| Schrama et al., “Antibody targeted drugs as cancer therapeutics,” Nature Rev. Drug Disc., vol. 5, pp. 147-159, 2006. |
| Schwager et al., “Preclinical characterization of DEKAVIL (F8-IL10), a novel clinical-stage immunocytokine which inhibits the progression of collagen-induced arthritis,” Arthritis and Research Therapy, vol. 11, R142, 2009. |
| Silacci et al., “Human monoclonal antibodies to domain C of tenascin-C selectively target solid tumors in vivo,” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 471-478, 2006. |
| Smith et al. “Computerized analysis of tumor cell interactions with extracellular matrix proteins, peptides, and endothelial cells under laminar flow,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. vol. 50, pp. 598-607, 1996. |
| Smolej and Kasparova, “Choice of endothelial marker is crucial for assessment of bone marrow microvessel density in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” APMIS, vol. 116, No. 12, pp. 1058-1062, 2008. |
| Soini et al., “Tenascin immunoreactivity in normal and pathological bone marrow,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 218-221, 1993. |
| Spaeth et al., “Radioimmunotherapy targeting the extra domain B of fibronectin in C6 rat gliomas: a preliminary study about the therapeutic efficacy of iodine-131-labeled SIP(L19),” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 33, pp. 661-666, 2006. |
| Tarli et al., “A High-Affinity Human Antibody That Targets Tumoral Blood Vessels,” Blood, vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 192-198, 1999. |
| Thorpe, “Vascular Targeting Agents as Cancer Therapeutics,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, pp. 415-427, 2004. |
| Think et al., “Radioimmunotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Xenografts Using 131I-Labeled Antibody L19-SIP for Selective Targeting of Tumor Vasculature,” J. Nucl. Med., vol. 47, pp. 1127-1135, 2006. |
| Trachsel et al., “Antibodies for angiogenesis inhibition, vascular targeting and endothelial cell transcytosis,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 735-754, 2006. |
| Trachsel et al., “Antibody-mediated delivery of IL-10 inhibits the progression of established collagen-induced arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 9, No. 1, R9, 2007. |
| Vajdos et al, “Comprehensive functional maps of the antigen-binding site of an anti-ErbB2 antibody obtained with shotgun scanning mutagenesis,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 320, No. 2, pp. 415-428, 2002. |
| Vartio et al., “Differential expression of the ED sequence-containing form of cellular fibronectin in embryonic and adult human tissues,” J. Cell Sci., 88:419-430, 1987. |
| Villa et al., “A high-affinity human monoclonal antibody specific to the alternatively spliced EDA domain of fibronectin efficiently targets tumor neo-vasculature in vivo,” Int. J. Cancer, 122(11):2405-2413, 2008. |
| Viti et al., “Increased Binding Affinity and Valence of Recombinant Antibody Fragments Lead to Improved Targeting of Tumoral Angiogenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, pp. 347-352, 1999. |
| Wallace, “Media hype and drug discovery,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 433-434, 1998. |
| Wang et al., “Identification of a mutated fibronectin as a tumor antigen recognized by CD4+ T cells: Its role in extracellular matrix formation and tumor metastasis,” J. Exp. Med. vol. 195, No. 11, pp. 1397-1406, 2002. |
| Wieckowski et al., “Therapeutic efficacy of the F8-IL2 immunocytokine in a metastatic mouse model of lung adenocarcinoma,” Lung Cancer, vol. 88, pp. 9-15, 2015. |
| Zardi et al., “Transformed human cells produce a new fibronectin isoform by preferential alternative splicing of a previously unobserved exon,” EMBO Journal, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 2337-2342, 1987. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160376356 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60951765 | Jul 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12665930 | US | |
| Child | 14456966 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14456966 | Aug 2014 | US |
| Child | 15261613 | US |
