Broadcast anchor availability indication

Abstract

A multicast status availability indication from an anchor (24) is provided to a plurality of base nodes (22) that are part of a multicast group serviced by the anchor (24). The availability status indication in one example is sent autonomously by the anchor (24) independent of any inquiry or attempted setup of a new session with that anchor by a base mode (22). The base modes (22) maintain a candidate anchor set that includes information regarding currently available anchors for establishing new sessions, for example.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates selected portions of an example communication system that is useful with an embodiment of this invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart diagram summarizing one example approach.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart diagram summarizing another example approach.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed example embodiments of this invention demonstrate how using a broadcast anchor status indication that is broadcast by an anchor to a plurality of base nodes allows for configuring a candidate anchor set that includes status information of at least one candidate anchor. Such an approach allows for a scalable, automated configuration of available candidate anchor sets in communication systems such as flat Internet Protocol cellular systems.

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates selected portions of an example communication system 20. A plurality of base nodes 22 facilitate communications on behalf of individual user devices, for example. A variety of devices may be used as a base node 22. One example includes a base station used for wireless communications. Such a base node may be used for macrocell or picocell coverage, for example. Another example base node is a router device that operates as a base station for a relatively limited or dedicated coverage area such as within a particular building. Another example base node is a server for a local area network. At least some of the base nodes 22 facilitate wireless communications between the base node and an end user device such as a mobile station or a computer.

The example of FIG. 1 also includes a plurality of anchors 24. A variety of anchor devices can be used depending on the needs of a particular situation. In some examples at least one base node acts as an anchor some of the time. Each of the anchors 24 has the ability to communicate with a plurality of the base nodes 22. In one example, the communication between the anchors 24 and the base nodes 22 occurs over an Internet Protocol (IP) network 26. Each anchor 24 provides an availability status indication to a plurality of the base nodes 22 indicating whether that anchor is available for establishing new sessions or unavailable because the anchor is already overloaded, is out of service or is subject to a maintenance procedure, for example. One example includes broadcasting the availability status indication to a plurality of the base nodes for configuring a candidate anchor set at each base node that includes an indication of currently available anchors. The term “broadcasting” as used in this description is intended to cover broadcast and multicast techniques.

The example availability status indication is different than a message from an anchor transmitted to a particular base node responsive to an inquiry or attempt by that base node to establish a connection with that anchor. The availability status indication is autonomously sent out by each anchor 24 independent of attempted access by base nodes or inquiries directly from a base node. Such an approach allows for scalability and automated or self-configuration of a candidate anchor set at each base node 22. Additionally, such an approach allows for more efficient overload status detection and reduces latency in bearer setup, at least in part, because a base node can predetermine whether an anchor is available before attempting to establish a connection through that anchor.

FIG. 2 includes a flowchart diagram 40 summarizing one example approach taken by an example anchor 24. At 42, the anchor 24 has an established multi-cast group. This is useful in an example where a multi-casting internet protocol is used by an anchor having internet routing capabilities for broadcasting the availability status indication. In one example, the multi-cast group includes IP addresses of each base node 22 with which an anchor is supposed to communicate the availability status indication. In one example, any base node 22 that has the possibility of connecting with an anchor 24 for purposes of establishing a session will be included in that anchor's multicast group. In most examples, the base nodes 22 will explicitly join a multicast group. One technique includes using an IMGPv3 join message. Given this description, those skilled in the art can determine how best to arrange a multicast group and to facilitate including base nodes in a multicast group to meet their particular needs.

At 44, the anchor 24 determines whether there has been a change in its current status. For example, when an anchor 24 is currently available for new sessions, a determination is made whether the anchor has become unavailable because of an overload condition, for example. If there is no change from its current status, the anchor 24 in the example of FIG. 2 sends a periodic availability status indication according to a preset schedule having regular intervals between the broadcast availability status indications. This occurs at 46 in the example of FIG. 2.

In the event that there is a status change at an anchor 24, the step at 48 is taken to send an immediate indication of the new availability status to provide information to the various base nodes 22 as soon as possible regarding the change in status of that anchor 24. In one example, the immediate notification of the status change preempts the regularly scheduled interval for sending availability status indication.

In one example, when the anchor is available, a first scheduled interval between availability status indications is used. When the anchor is unavailable, a second, smaller interval between indications is used to facilitate providing information regarding an unavailable anchor as soon as possible to any base nodes that have not already received an indication that the particular anchor is unavailable. This may occur, for example, when a new base node is added to a multicast group.

The example of FIG. 2 includes a decision at 50 whether any new base nodes 22 have been added to the multicast group of an anchor 24. If so, the multicast group is updated and the anchor continues sending the availability status indications as described above.

In one example, the availability status indication from an anchor includes current status information. In another example, at least one availability status indication provides information regarding a preselected or scheduled time during which the anchor will not be available. This may occur, for example, during a scheduled maintenance procedure. One example embodiment includes configuring a status indication to provide information regarding a particular anchor being unavailable at a future time. In such an example, the base nodes 22 maintain such information in association with the candidate anchor set for maintaining an indication that a particular anchor is unavailable at such a time. Such an approach allows for even more flexibility when selecting an anchor for establishing a new session even when an anchor is currently available but may very soon become unavailable.

FIG. 3 includes a flowchart diagram 60 summarizing an example approach used by a base node 22. Each base node maintains a candidate anchor set as a look up table or database. At 62, the base node joins a multicast group. This occurs in one example by having an appropriate IP address configured into a base node 22 so that it will be included as part of a multicast group to which availability status indications are provided by at least one anchor with which that base node may establish a connection. Once a base node 22 is part of a multicast group, it begins receiving status indications from any anchor or anchors 24 that provide status indications to that multicast group. In some examples, a base node 22 will be a member of more than one multicast group, each of which may include one or more anchors 24.

At 64, the base node 22 receives a status indication from a particular anchor 24. At 66, the base node determines whether that is a current candidate anchor. If so, at 68, the base node determines the current status of that anchor. At 70, the base node updates the current status to indicate whether that anchor is available or unavailable. The step at 70 may include changing the status or maintaining the status based upon a previously received availability status indication.

The example of FIG. 3 also includes a step at 72 where the base node determines that it is receiving an availability status indication for the first time from an anchor 24. In this example, the base node adds the anchor to the candidate set and then proceeds to maintain an appropriate status of that anchor in the set. The base node uses the candidate anchor set information for purposes of selecting an anchor for establishing a new session, for example.

Having multicast or broadcast status indication information from the anchors 24 available for the base nodes 22 facilitates more efficient connections between the base nodes 22 and the anchors 24 for establishing new sessions, for example. With the disclosed examples, there no longer is a need for a base node 22 to attempt to establish a connection with an anchor 24 that is not currently available. Instead, the base nodes 22 are able to select anchors 24 that are currently available.

One example includes using a data origin authentication and integrity protection technique to protect the broadcast availability status indications and to ensure reliable information useful by the base nodes 22 for purposes of configuring their candidate anchor sets.

The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.

Claims

1. A method of communicating, comprising using a broadcast availability status indication from an anchor to a plurality of base nodes for configuring a candidate anchor set including currently available anchors.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the availability status indication comprises an indication that the anchor is available.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the availability status indication comprises an indication that the anchor is unavailable.

4. The method of claim 1, comprising broadcasting the availability status indication simultaneously to the plurality of base nodes.

5. The method of claim 1, comprising broadcasting the availability status indication independent of an inquiry from any of the plurality of base nodes.

6. The method of claim 1, comprising broadcasting the availability status indication over an Internet Protocol network using a multicasting protocol.

7. The method of claim 1, comprising broadcasting the availability status indication periodically at each of a plurality of times spaced by a regular interval; andbroadcasting the availability status indication at another time responsive to a change in the availability of the anchor.

8. The method of claim 1, comprising receiving the broadcast availability status indication from the anchor; andresponsively configuring the candidate anchor set.

9. The method of claim 8, comprising receiving the broadcast availability status indication from a plurality of anchors; andautomatically updating a status of at least one of the plurality of anchors within the candidate anchor set responsive to a corresponding received indication that the status of the at least one anchor has changed from a previous status.

10. The method of claim 1, comprising providing an indicator of at least one base node to the anchor for inclusion among the plurality of base nodes for receiving the broadcast availability status indication.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the availability status indication includes information regarding a future time when the anchor will become unavailable.

12. A communication system having a decentralized architecture, comprising a plurality of base nodes; andat least one anchor that broadcasts an availability status indication to the plurality of base nodes, each of the plurality of base nodes configuring a candidate anchor set responsive to receiving the broadcast availability status indication.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the availability status indication comprises an indication that the anchor is available.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the availability status indication comprises an indication that the anchor is unavailable.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one anchor broadcasts the availability status indication simultaneously to the plurality of base nodes.

16. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one anchor broadcasts the availability status indication independent of an inquiry from any of the plurality of base nodes.

17. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one anchor and the base nodes are associated with an Internet Protocol network and the at least one anchor broadcasts the availability status indication over the Internet Protocol network using a multicasting protocol.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one anchor broadcasts the availability status indication periodically at each of a plurality of times spaced by a regular interval; andbroadcasts the availability status indication at another time responsive to a change in the availability of the at least one anchor.

19. The system of claim 12, comprising a plurality of anchors that each broadcast a corresponding availability status indication to the plurality of base nodes; andwherein each base node automatically updates a status of at least one of the plurality of anchors within the candidate anchor set responsive to a corresponding received indication that the status of the at least one anchor has changed from a previous status.

20. The system of claim 12, wherein the availability status indication includes information regarding a future time when the at least one anchor will become unavailable.