Conductive channel pseudo block process and circuit to inhibit reverse engineering

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8258583
  • Patent Number
    8,258,583
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 18, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A technique for and structures for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. The integrated circuit structure is formed by a plurality of layers of material having a controlled outline. A layer of conductive material having a controlled outline is disposed among said plurality of layers to provide artifact edges of the conductive material that resemble one type of transistor (operable vs. non-operable), when in fact another type of transistor was used.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to integrated circuits (ICs) and semiconductor devices in general and their methods of manufacture wherein the integrated circuits and semiconductor devices employ camouflaging techniques which make it difficult for the reverse engineer to discern how the semiconductor device functions.


RELATED ART

The present invention is related to the following US patents by some of the same inventors as the present inventors:

    • (1) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,866,933; 5,783,375 and 6,294,816 teach how transistors in a CMOS circuit are connected by implanted (and therefore hidden and buried) lines between the transistors by modifying the p+ and n+ source/drain masks. These implanted interconnections are used to make 3-input AND or OR circuits look substantially identical to the reverse engineer. Also, buried interconnects force the reverse engineer to examine the IC in greater depth to try to figure out the connectivity between transistors and hence their function.
    • (2) U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663 and 6,064,110 teach a further modification in the source/drain implant masks so that the implanted connecting lines between transistors have a gap inserted, with approximately the length of the minimum feature size of the CMOS technology being used. If this gap is “filled” with one kind of implant, the line conducts; but if it is “filled” with another kind of implant, the line does not conduct. The intentional gaps are called “channel blocks.” The reverse engineer is forced to determine connectivity on the basis of resolving the implant type at the minimum feature size of the CMOS process being used.
    • (3) U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,762 teaches a method and apparatus for protecting semiconductor integrated circuits from reverse engineering. Semiconductor active areas are formed on a substrate and a silicide layer is formed both over at least one active area of the semiconductor active areas and over a selected substrate area for interconnecting the at least one active area with another area through the silicide area formed on the selected substrate area.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The creation of complex integrated circuits and semiconductor devices can be a very expensive undertaking given the large number of hours of sophisticated engineering talent involved in designing such devices. Additionally, integrated circuits can include read only memories and/or EEPROMS into which software, in the form of firmware, is encoded. Further, integrated circuits are often used in applications involving the encryption of information, therefore, in order to keep such information confidential, it can be desirable to keep such devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, there can be a variety of reasons for protecting integrated circuits and other semiconductor devices from being reversed engineered.


In order to keep the reverse engineer at bay, different techniques are known in the art to make integrated circuits more difficult to reverse engineer. One technique is to make the connections between transistors difficult to determine forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor (in particular, each CMOS transistor pair for CMOS devices), and thwarting attempts to use automatic circuit and pattern recognition techniques in order to reverse engineer an integrated circuit. Since integrated circuits can have hundreds of thousands or even millions of transistors, forcing the reverse engineer to carefully analyze each transistor in a device can effectively frustrate the reverse engineer's ability to reverse engineer the device successfully.


A conductive layer, such as silicide, is often used during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. In modern CMOS devices, especially with feature sizes below 0.5 μm, a silicide layer is utilized to improve the conductivity of gate, source and drain contacts. In accordance with general design rules, any implant region using a source/drain implant is silicided.


One common reverse engineering technique involves de-layering the completed IC by means of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The CMP process may, under some conditions, reveal the regions between where the silicide was formed and where it was not, i.e., the regions defined by the silicide block mask step. These regions may be revealed because, under some kinds of chemical etches, there is an observable difference in topology due to different etching rates for silicided areas versus pure silicon areas. The reverse engineer, by noting the silicided areas versus non-silicided areas, may make reasonable assumptions as to the function of the device. This information can then be stored into a database for automatic classification of other similar devices.


Some methods of protecting against reverse engineering may be susceptible to discovery under some reverse engineering techniques, such as CMP. For example, FIGS. 1A and 1B depict artifacts after CMP processing of transistors made in accordance with U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663; and 6,064,110. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,783,846; 5,930,663; and 6,064,110 disclose hiding the connection of doped circuit elements 26, 22 (i.e. source/drain areas) of like conductivity with electrically conductive doped implants 23-25 in the substrate, as shown in FIG. 1A. The electrically conductive doped implants 23-25 in the substrate may be provided during the same processing step as the source/drain regions and, as such, have the same doping levels and are similarly silicided. In addition, as shown in FIG. 1B, to further confuse the reverse engineer, an electrically conductive doped implant is selectively doped with a different conductivity type, creating a channel block structure 27, which prevents the electrical connection from one doped circuit element to another. In order to prevent the electrical connection from one doped circuit element 26 to another 22 via the silicide, the silicide block mask is modified. Instead of allowing a silicide layer to occur over any implant region using a source/drain implant, the silicide block mask is modified to prevent a silicide layer over the channel block structure 27.



FIGS. 1A and 1B depict artifact edges 28 of the silicide by the broken lines shown thereon. In FIG. 1A, the silicide is allowed to cover the all of the doped regions 22-26 because all of the doped regions 22-26 are doped with like conductivity type dopants. In FIG. 1B, a silicide block mask is used to prevent silicide from covering doped region 27. A reverse engineer, after a suitable stain/etch on the bare silicon surface, may be able to view this area and detect the artifact edges 28 of the silicide, which are produced at the interfaces of the silicided versus non-silicided regions. For the structure depicted by FIG. 1B, the reverse engineer could possibly conclude that when the artifact edge 28 is as shown, with an interruption 30 between the two depicted silicided portions, that such an interruption 30 would denote that the underlying conductive implants include a non-conductive channel block structure 27. This information could then be entered into a data base and automatic pattern recognition techniques could be used to recognize the pattern with the interruption 30 as being indicative of a non-conductive channel block structure 27. Thus, the effectiveness of this circuit camouflage technique is diminished.


Therefore a need exists to provide a semiconductor device and a method of manufacturing semiconductor devices that uses artifact edges to confuse the reverse engineer. Providing artifact edges that are not indicative of the actual device formed will further confuse the reverse engineer and result in incorrect conclusions as to the actual composition, and thus function, of the device.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of this invention to make reverse engineering even more difficult and, in particular, to confuse the reverse engineer's study of the artifacts revealed during the reverse engineering process by providing artifacts that are not indicative of the same underlying processing and circuit features so that the reverse engineer is given reason to doubt the validity of typical conclusions. It is believed that this will make the reverse engineer's efforts all the more difficult in terms of making it very time consuming in order to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention and perhaps making it exceedingly impractical, if not impossible, to reverse engineer a chip employing the present invention. By confusing the reverse engineer's study of the artifacts, the reverse engineer is forced to examine every implanted channel making the reverse engineer's job extremely time consuming.


An important aspect of the present invention is that it does not rely upon modifications or additions to the function of the circuitry that is to be protected from reverse engineering, nor does it require any additional processing steps or equipment. Instead, a highly effective deterrent to reverse engineering is accomplished in a streamlined manner that adds neither processing time nor complexity to the basic circuitry.


The Inventors named herein have previously filed Patent Applications and have received Patents in this general area of technology, that is, relating to the camouflage of integrated circuit devices in order to make it more difficult to reverse engineer them. The present invention can be used harmoniously with the techniques disclosed above in the prior United States Patents to further confuse the reverse engineer.


Note that the present invention might only be used on one in a thousand instances on the chip in question, but the reverse engineer will have to look very carefully at each transistor or connection knowing full well that for each transistor or connection that he or she sees, there is a very low likelihood that it has been modified by the present invention. The reverse engineer will be faced with having to find the proverbial needle in a haystack. The present invention may also be used numerous times, i.e. with every CMOS pair, thus the reverse engineer is forced to study each channel, thereby making reverse engineering very impractical.


Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention comprises a semiconductor device and a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device in which a conductive layer block mask is modified resulting in reverse engineering artifacts that are misleading and not indicative of the true structure of the device.


In another aspect, the present invention provides for camouflaging an integrated circuit structure. The integrated circuit structure is formed by a plurality of layers of material having controlled outlines. A layer of silicide is disposed among said plurality of layers with a controlled outline. The layer of silicide being used to confuse the reverse engineer into believing the semiconductor has one structure, when in fact it has another structure.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A depicts prior art artifact edges of a silicide layer the reverse engineer will see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed from a conductive channel;



FIG. 1B depicts prior art artifact edges of a silicide layer the reverse engineer will see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed from a conductive channel which includes a channel block; and



FIG. 2 depicts artifact edges of a silicide layer the reverse engineer will see after all the metal and oxide layers have been removed in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 shows a single integrated circuit device that includes conducting and non-conducting channels of the types shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 2 in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is shown. This invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.


There are many methods of manufacturing of semiconductor devices well-known in the art. The following discussion does not include details regarding the manufacturing of semiconductor devices. Rather, the discussion focuses on modifying a conductive layer block mask used during the manufacturing of semiconductor devices in order to further confuse a reverse engineer.


The present invention makes use of an artifact edge of a silicide layer that a reverse engineer might see when reverse engineering devices manufactured with other reverse engineering detection prevention techniques.


In a reverse engineering detection prevention technique, described above, channel block structures are used to confuse the reverse engineer. As shown in FIG. 1B, the channel block structure 27 has a different dopant type than the channel areas 23, 25 and has an interruption 30 in the overlying silicide. After using a reverse engineering process, such as CMP, the artifact edges 28 of a silicide layer may reveal to the reverse engineer that a channel block structure 24, 27 has been used to interrupt the electrical connection between two channel areas 23, 25, as can be seen from comparing FIGS. 1A and 1B. The type of dopant used in the channel areas and the channel block structure is not readily available to the reverse engineer during most reverse engineering processes. Thus, the reverse engineer is forced to rely upon other methods, such as the artifact edges 28 of a silicide layer, to determine if the conductive channel has a channel block in it.



FIG. 2 depicts artifact edges 28 of a silicide layer of a device manufactured in accordance with the present invention. A silicide block mask is preferably modified to prevent a silicide layer from completely covering a pseudo channel block structure 29. Channel block structure 29 is of the same conductivity type as channel areas 23, 25; therefore, the presence or absence of a silicide layer connecting the channel areas 23, 25 does not have an impact on the electrical conductivity through the channel. However, by modifying the silicide block mask to prevent a silicide layer from completely covering the pseudo channel block structure 29, the artifact edge 28 with interruption 30 appears to the reverse engineer to indicate that the channel is not electrically connected, i.e. the artifact edges 28 of FIG. 2 are identical to the artifact edges 28 of FIG. 1B. Thus, the reverse engineer, when viewing the artifact edge 28, would leap to an incorrect assumption as to the connectivity of the underlying channel.


In order to further camouflage the circuit, the dopant type used in channel block structure 29 may be created at the same time Lightly Doped Drains (LDD) are created. Thus, even using stain and etch processes, the reverse engineer will have a much more difficult time discerning the difference between the two types of implants, N-type versus P-type, vis-a-vis the much higher dose of the source/drain implants 22, 26. Further, by creating the pseudo channel block structure 29 with the LDD processes, the channel block structure 29 can be made smaller in dimensions because of breakdown considerations.


In the preferred method of manufacturing the present invention, the design rules of a semiconductor chip manufacturer are modified to allow implanted regions that are not silicided. In addition, the design rules may also be modified to allow for channel block structure 29 to be small and lightly doped (through the use of LDD implants) to further prevent detection by the reverse engineer.


In modifying the design rules, it is important to ensure that the artifact edges of an actual conducting channel, as shown in FIG. 2, match the placement of the artifact edges of a non-conducting channel, as shown in FIG. 1B. For illustration purposes, the artifact edges 28 in FIG. 1B match the artifact edges 28 of FIG. 2. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, the artifact edges 28 do not have to be located as specifically shown in FIG. 1B or 2. Instead, the artifact edges may appear almost anywhere along the channel. However, it is important that (1) the silicide layer does not provide an electrical connection (i.e. that the silicide layer does not completely cover channels with an intentional block or a pseudo block therein), and (2) that the artifact edges 28 for an electrical connection (i.e. a true connection) are relatively the same as the artifact edges 28 for a non-electrical connection (i.e. a false connection). As such, while it may be advisable to include conducting and non-conducting channels of the types shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B and 2 all on a single integrated circuit device 40, as shown in FIG. 3, it is the use of a mixture of channels of the types shown and described with reference to FIGS. 1B and 2 that will keep the reverse engineer at bay.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that while FIGS. 1A, 1B and 2 use N-type doped areas 22-25, 29 with a P-type channel block structure 27 the above holds true for P-type doped areas with a N-type channel block structure.


Additionally, the invention is preferably used not to completely disable a multiple transistor circuit in which this invention is used, but rather to cause the circuit to function in an unexpected or non-intuitive manner. For example, what appears to be an OR gate to the reverse might really function as an AND gate. Or what appears as an inverting input might really be non-inverting. The possibilities are practically endless and are almost sure to cause the reverse engineer so much grief that he or she will give up as opposed to pressing forward to discover how to reverse engineer the integrated circuit device on which these techniques are utilized.


Finally, the disclosed method and apparatus is compatible with other camouflaging techniques which may be used to protect integrated circuit devices from being reverse engineered. Thus, this may be one of many techniques used with a given integrated circuit device to protect it from being successfully reverse engineered.


Having described the invention in connection with certain preferred embodiments thereof, modification will now certainly suggest itself to those skilled in the art. As such, the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, except as is specifically required by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An integrated circuit for making reverse engineering difficult comprising: a first electrically conductive doped channel having a first doping type between at least two first regions of the first channel having the first doping type;a first conductive layer over a portion of one of said first regions; anda second conductive layer over a portion of the other one of said first regions wherein said first conductive layer and said second conductive layer are spaced apart from one another;a second electrically conductive doped channel on the integrated circuit having a second doping type between at least two second regions of the second channel having the first doping type;a third conductive layer over a portion of one of said second regions; anda fourth conductive layer over a portion of the other of said second regions wherein said third conductive layer and said fourth conductive layer are spaced apart from one another;wherein edges of the first and second conductive layers are in a same relative location as edges of the third and fourth conductive layers.
  • 2. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein said first and second conductive layers are silicide layers.
  • 3. The integrated circuit of claim 1 further comprising: a third electrically conductive doped channel having the first doping type between at least two third regions of the third channel having the first doping type; anda fifth conductive layer over the third electrically conductive doped channel.
  • 4. The integrated circuit of claim 3 wherein said first, second, third, fourth, and fifth conductive layers comprise silicide.
  • 5. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein said first doping type comprises n-type doping and the second doping type comprises p-type doping.
  • 6. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein said first doping type comprises p-type doping and the second doping type comprises n-type doping.
  • 7. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein positions of the first conductive layer and the second conductive layer relative to the first electrically conductive doped channel are substantially similar to positions of the third conductive layer and the fourth conductive layer relative to the second electrically conductive doped channel.
  • 8. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein said first electrically conductive doped channel is created using a smaller dopant concentration than a dopant concentration used to create said at least two active regions.
  • 9. The integrated circuit of claim 1 wherein the first doping type used in the first electrically conductive doped channel is formed at a same time as forming a plurality of Lightly Doped Drains (LDDs).
  • 10. An integrated circuit for protecting an integrated circuit design comprising: first boundary edges of a first conductive layer formed on a channel block on the integrated circuit in first positions relative to the channel block having a first doping type to prevent the first conductive layer from forming an electrically conductive path over the channel block; andsecond boundary edges of a second conductive layer formed on a conducting channel on the integrated circuit in second positions relative to the conducting channel having a second doping type, the second positions relative to the conducting channel being substantially similar to the first positions relative to the channel block.
  • 11. The integrated circuit of claim 10 wherein said first conductive layer and said second conductive layer comprise silicide.
  • 12. The integrated circuit of claim 10 wherein the first dopant type used in the conducting channel is formed at a same time as forming a plurality of Lightly Doped Drains (LDDs).
  • 13. An integrated circuit for protecting an integrated circuit design comprising: a first conductive layer on the integrated circuit having edges aligned with and on a non-conducting channel-blocked channel; anda second conductive layer on the integrated circuit having edges aligned with and on a pseudo channel-blocked conducting channel in the same disposition as said edges of said first conductive layer for said non-conducting channel-blocked channel.
  • 14. The integrated circuit of claim 13 wherein said first and second conductive layers comprise silicide.
  • 15. The integrated circuit of claim 13 further comprising: a first dopant type formed in the pseudo channel blocked conducting channel;wherein the first dopant type is formed at a same time as forming a plurality of Lightly Doped Drains (LDDs).
  • 16. The integrated circuit of claim 13: wherein the non-conducting channel-blocked channel comprises a first doping type; andwherein the pseudo channel-blocked conducting channel does not comprise the first doping type.
CROSS REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION

This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/375,846, filed on Mar. 14, 2006, which is incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

US Referenced Citations (234)
Number Name Date Kind
3673471 Klein et al. Jun 1972 A
3898105 Mai et al. Aug 1975 A
3946426 Sanders Mar 1976 A
3983620 Spadea Oct 1976 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4139864 Vetter Feb 1979 A
4143854 Vetter Mar 1979 A
4145701 Kawagoe Mar 1979 A
4164461 Schilling Aug 1979 A
4196443 Dingwall Apr 1980 A
4267578 Vetter May 1981 A
4291391 Chatterjee et al. Sep 1981 A
4295897 Tubbs et al. Oct 1981 A
4314268 Yoshioka et al. Feb 1982 A
4317273 Guterman et al. Mar 1982 A
4322736 Sasaki et al. Mar 1982 A
4374454 Jochems Feb 1983 A
4393575 Dunkley et al. Jul 1983 A
4409434 Basset et al. Oct 1983 A
4435895 Parrillo Mar 1984 A
4471376 Morcom et al. Sep 1984 A
4493740 Komeda Jan 1985 A
4530150 Shirato Jul 1985 A
4581628 Miyauchi et al. Apr 1986 A
4583011 Pechar Apr 1986 A
4603381 Guttag et al. Jul 1986 A
4623255 Suszko Nov 1986 A
4636822 Codella et al. Jan 1987 A
4727038 Watabe Feb 1988 A
4727493 Taylor, Sr. Feb 1988 A
4729001 Haskell Mar 1988 A
4753897 Lund et al. Jun 1988 A
4766516 Ozdemir et al. Aug 1988 A
4771012 Yabu et al. Sep 1988 A
4799096 Koeppe Jan 1989 A
4814854 Tigelaar et al. Mar 1989 A
4821085 Haken et al. Apr 1989 A
4829356 Arndt May 1989 A
4830974 Chang et al. May 1989 A
4860084 Shibata Aug 1989 A
4912053 Schrantz Mar 1990 A
4927777 Hsu et al. May 1990 A
4931411 Tigelaar et al. Jun 1990 A
4939567 Kenney Jul 1990 A
4962484 Takeshima et al. Oct 1990 A
4975756 Haken et al. Dec 1990 A
4998151 Korman et al. Mar 1991 A
5015596 Toyoda et al. May 1991 A
5016077 Sato et al. May 1991 A
5030796 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5050123 Castro Sep 1991 A
5061978 Mizutani et al. Oct 1991 A
5065208 Shah et al. Nov 1991 A
5068697 Noda et al. Nov 1991 A
5070378 Yamagata Dec 1991 A
5073812 Shimura Dec 1991 A
5101121 Sourgen Mar 1992 A
5117276 Thomas et al. May 1992 A
5120669 Schrantz Jun 1992 A
5121089 Larson et al. Jun 1992 A
5121186 Wong et al. Jun 1992 A
5132571 McCollum et al. Jul 1992 A
5138197 Kuwana Aug 1992 A
5146117 Larson Sep 1992 A
5168340 Nishimura Dec 1992 A
5177589 Kobayashi et al. Jan 1993 A
5202591 Walden Apr 1993 A
5210437 Sawada et al. May 1993 A
5225699 Nakamura Jul 1993 A
5227649 Chapman Jul 1993 A
5231299 Ning et al. Jul 1993 A
5302539 Haken et al. Apr 1994 A
5308682 Morikawa May 1994 A
5309015 Kuwata et al. May 1994 A
5317197 Roberts May 1994 A
5336624 Walden Aug 1994 A
5341013 Koyanagi et al. Aug 1994 A
5345105 Sun et al. Sep 1994 A
5354704 Yang et al. Oct 1994 A
5369299 Byrne et al. Nov 1994 A
5371390 Mohsen Dec 1994 A
5371443 Sun et al. Dec 1994 A
5376577 Roberts et al. Dec 1994 A
5378641 Cheffings Jan 1995 A
5384472 Yin Jan 1995 A
5384475 Yahata Jan 1995 A
5399441 Bearinger et al. Mar 1995 A
5404040 Hshieh et al. Apr 1995 A
5412237 Komori et al. May 1995 A
5441902 IIsieh et al. Aug 1995 A
5453635 Hsu et al. Sep 1995 A
5468990 Daum Nov 1995 A
5475251 Kuo et al. Dec 1995 A
5506806 Fukushima Apr 1996 A
5510279 Chien et al. Apr 1996 A
5531018 Saia et al. Jul 1996 A
5539224 Ema Jul 1996 A
5541614 Lam et al. Jul 1996 A
5571735 Mogami et al. Nov 1996 A
5576988 Kuo et al. Nov 1996 A
5580804 Joh Dec 1996 A
5585658 Mukai et al. Dec 1996 A
5611940 Zettler Mar 1997 A
5635749 Hong Jun 1997 A
5638946 Zavracky Jun 1997 A
5650340 Burr et al. Jul 1997 A
5675172 Miyamoto et al. Oct 1997 A
5677557 Wuu et al. Oct 1997 A
5679595 Chen et al. Oct 1997 A
5702972 Tsai et al. Dec 1997 A
5719422 Burr et al. Feb 1998 A
5719430 Goto Feb 1998 A
5721150 Pasch Feb 1998 A
5744372 Bulucea Apr 1998 A
5763916 Gonzalez et al. Jun 1998 A
5783375 Twist Jul 1998 A
5783846 Baukus et al. Jul 1998 A
5789298 Gardner et al. Aug 1998 A
5811340 Park Sep 1998 A
5821147 Kizilyalli Oct 1998 A
5821590 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5831306 Gardner et al. Nov 1998 A
5834356 Bothra et al. Nov 1998 A
5834809 Kato et al. Nov 1998 A
5838047 Yamauchi et al. Nov 1998 A
5854510 Sur, Jr. et al. Dec 1998 A
5858843 Doyle et al. Jan 1999 A
5866933 Baukus et al. Feb 1999 A
5874328 Liu et al. Feb 1999 A
5877050 Gardner et al. Mar 1999 A
5880503 Matsumoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5888887 Li et al. Mar 1999 A
5891782 Hsu et al. Apr 1999 A
5895241 Lu et al. Apr 1999 A
5909622 Kadosh et al. Jun 1999 A
5920097 Horne Jul 1999 A
5925914 Jiang Jul 1999 A
5930663 Baukus et al. Jul 1999 A
5930667 Oda Jul 1999 A
5933737 Goto Aug 1999 A
5960291 Krivokapic Sep 1999 A
5973375 Baukus et al. Oct 1999 A
5977593 Hara Nov 1999 A
5998257 Lane et al. Dec 1999 A
5998272 Ishida et al. Dec 1999 A
6010929 Chapman Jan 2000 A
6020227 Bulucea Feb 2000 A
6030869 Odake et al. Feb 2000 A
6031272 Hiroki et al. Feb 2000 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6044011 Marr Mar 2000 A
6046659 Loo et al. Apr 2000 A
6054659 Lee et al. Apr 2000 A
6057520 Goodwin-Johansson May 2000 A
6064110 Baukus et al. May 2000 A
6078080 Kadosh et al. Jun 2000 A
6080614 Neilson et al. Jun 2000 A
6084248 Inoue Jul 2000 A
6090692 Song Jul 2000 A
6093609 Chuang Jul 2000 A
6103563 Lukanc et al. Aug 2000 A
6117762 Baukus et al. Sep 2000 A
6137318 Takaaki Oct 2000 A
6146952 Nariman et al. Nov 2000 A
6153484 Donaton et al. Nov 2000 A
6154388 Oh Nov 2000 A
6215158 Choi Apr 2001 B1
6242329 Huster et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255174 Yu Jul 2001 B1
6261912 Hsiao et al. Jul 2001 B1
6294816 Baukus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6316303 Lin et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326675 Scott et al. Dec 2001 B1
6337249 Yamane et al. Jan 2002 B1
6365453 Deboer et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373106 Maki et al. Apr 2002 B2
6380041 Yeap et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384457 Tyagi et al. May 2002 B2
6399452 Krishnan et al. Jun 2002 B1
6410413 Scott et al. Jun 2002 B2
6455388 Lai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6465315 Yu Oct 2002 B1
6466489 Ieong et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476449 Lin Nov 2002 B1
6479350 Ling et al. Nov 2002 B1
6503787 Choi Jan 2003 B1
6534787 Hsu Mar 2003 B1
6566204 Wang et al. May 2003 B1
6613661 Baukus Sep 2003 B1
6653694 Osanai Nov 2003 B1
6740942 Baukus et al. May 2004 B2
6746924 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6815816 Clark et al. Nov 2004 B1
6825530 Brown et al. Nov 2004 B1
6833307 Wristers et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833589 Matsuhashi et al. Dec 2004 B2
6911694 Negoro et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919600 Baukus Jul 2005 B2
6921690 Church Jul 2005 B2
6930361 Inaba Aug 2005 B2
6933560 Lee et al. Aug 2005 B2
6979606 Chow et al. Dec 2005 B2
7012273 Chen Mar 2006 B2
7049667 Chow et al. May 2006 B2
7091114 Ito Aug 2006 B2
7122899 Lippmann et al. Oct 2006 B2
7166515 Clark et al. Jan 2007 B2
7179712 Hoefler Feb 2007 B2
7195266 Baukus Mar 2007 B2
7208383 Weintraub et al. Apr 2007 B1
7242063 Chow et al. Jul 2007 B1
7344932 Chow et al. Mar 2008 B2
20010042892 Okada et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020043689 Matsuoka et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020058368 Tseng May 2002 A1
20020096776 Chow Jul 2002 A1
20020173131 Clark, Jr. et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030057476 Morita et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030127709 Lippmann Jul 2003 A1
20030173622 Porter et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030205816 Janke Nov 2003 A1
20040051137 Kitamura Mar 2004 A1
20040061186 Chow et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040075147 Ueda et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040099912 Chow et al. May 2004 A1
20040144998 Chow et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040164361 Baukus et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040211990 Asano et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050082625 Kim Apr 2005 A1
20050230787 Chow et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060049449 Iino et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071278 Takao Apr 2006 A1
20060105489 Rhodes May 2006 A1
20060157803 Chow et al. Jul 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
0 186 855 Jul 1986 EP
0 364 769 Apr 1990 EP
0 463 373 Jan 1992 EP
0 528 302 Feb 1993 EP
0 585 601 Mar 1994 EP
0 764 985 Mar 1997 EP
0 883 184 Dec 1998 EP
0 920 057 Jun 1999 EP
1 193 758 Apr 2002 EP
1 202 353 May 2002 EP
2 486 717 Jan 1982 FR
S58-016565 Jul 1982 JP
58-190064 Nov 1983 JP
S59-035465 Feb 1984 JP
61-147551 Jul 1986 JP
61-201472 Sep 1986 JP
63-129647 Jun 1988 JP
H01-213350 Aug 1989 JP
02-046762 Feb 1990 JP
H02-062118 Mar 1990 JP
02-188944 Jul 1990 JP
02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
H02-237038 Sep 1990 JP
04-028092 Jan 1992 JP
H04-267553 Sep 1992 JP
05-218849 Aug 1993 JP
H05-218849 Aug 1993 JP
H08-274041 Oct 1996 JP
10-256398 Sep 1998 JP
2000-040809 Feb 2000 JP
2000-040810 Feb 2000 JP
9821734 May 1998 WO
9857373 Dec 1998 WO
0044012 Jul 2000 WO
0055889 Sep 2000 WO
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11375846 Mar 2006 US
Child 12949657 US