Corylus plant named ‘OSU 541.147’

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • PP33561
  • Patent Number
    PP33,561
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 28, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 19, 2021
    2 years ago
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • PLT 216000
    • PLT 152000
  • International Classifications
    • A01H5/08
    • A01H6/00
Abstract
A new and distinct interspecific hybrid Corylus plant named ‘OSU 541.147’ characterized by a vigorous, upright growth habit, the production of nuts with round kernels that fall free of the husk at maturity, and resistance to eastern filbert blight caused by the fungus Anisogramma anomala (Peck) E. Müller.
Description

Botanical denomination: (Corylus americana x Corylus avellana) x Corylus avellana cultivar.


Variety designation: ‘OSU 541.147’.


PARTIES TO JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT

Oregon State University, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, and Arbor Day Foundation executed a Joint Research Agreement on or before the date subject matter disclosed and claimed by the present application was made, and such subject matter was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the Joint Research Agreement.


BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of hybrid Corylus plant, botanically known as (Corylus americana x Corylus avellana) x Corylus avellana, and hereinafter referred to by the name ‘OSU 541.147’.


The new Corylus plant resulted from a controlled cross of the female parent ‘NY 616’ (Corylus americana ‘Rush’ x Corylus avellana ‘Barcelona’) (unpatented) x male parent Corylus avellana ‘OSU 226.118’ (unpatented) made in February 1990 (FIG. 1). Hybrid seeds resulting from the cross were harvested in August 1990. They were provided a period of moist chilling, subsequently germinated, and the seedlings were grown in the greenhouse during the summer of 1991. From this cross, a total of 125 seedling trees were planted in a research field in Corvallis, Oreg., in October 1991. ‘OSU 541.147’ was discovered and selected as a single plant within that progeny of the stated cross-pollination. It was originally assigned the designation ‘OSU 541.147’, which indicates the row and tree location of the original seedling.


The female parent is a tree labeled ‘NY 616’ in row M and tree 1 (M01) in the variety plot in Corvallis, Oreg. It is an unpatented F1 Corylus americana x Corylus avellana selection developed in New York from a cross of Corylus americana ‘Rush’ x C. avellana ‘Barcelona’ (Slate, 1930). ‘Rush’ is a Corylus americana selection from southeastern Pennsylvania. ‘Barcelona’ is an old Corylus avellana cultivar from Spain that is widely distributed in Europe and was introduced in the U.S. in about 1885 (Mehlenbacher and Miller, 1989). ‘Barcelona’ is more than 200 years old and is known under several different names, including ‘Castanyera’ in Tarragona (Spain), ‘Grande’ in Asturias (Spain), ‘Grada de Viseu’ in Portugal, and ‘Fertile de Coutard’ in France. The female parent contributed incompatibility allele S23 to ‘OSU 541.147’ (Table 1). ‘Rush’ carries a dominant allele for eastern filbert blight resistance on linkage group 7 (Bhattarai et al., 2017; Coyne et al., 1998).









TABLE 1







Incompatibility alleles of the NY hybrid hazelnuts developed in Geneva,


New York, and the Corylus avellana parents. Also shown are the field


locations at the USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository. ‘NY


616’, the parent of ‘OSU 541.147’, carried S23.










Selection
S-alleles
Location
Listed Parentage





‘Buchanan’ (unpatented)

12
15

N02.53
‘Rush’ × ‘Barcelona’


‘Reed’ (unpatented)

12
15

N14.13
‘Rush’ × ‘Hall's Giant’


‘Potomac’ (unpatented)

 5
12

N01.53
‘Rush’ × ‘DuChilly’


‘NY 104’ (unpatented)

14 23

N05.42
‘Rush’ × ‘DuChilly’


‘NY 110’ (unpatented)

10
12

N02.42
‘Rush’ × ‘DuChilly’


‘NY 200’ (unpatented)

15 23

N02.44
‘Rush’ × ‘Hall's Giant’


‘NY 398’ (unpatented)

15 23

N04.22
‘Rush’ × ‘Red Lambert’


‘NY 485’ (unpatented)

12
14

N03.28
‘Rush’ × ‘DuChilly’


‘NY 529’ (unpatented)

 3 12

N04.28
‘Rush’ × ‘Daviana’


‘NY 588’ (unpatented)

15 23

N01.30
‘Rush’ × ‘Red Lambert’


‘NY 616’ (unpatented)

 1 23

N04.47
‘Rush’ × ‘Barcelona’


‘NY 1329’ (unpatented)

 3 23

N03.24
‘Rush’ × ‘Cosford’


‘NY 1408’ (unpatented)

11 23

N02.24
‘Rush’ × ‘Cosford’


‘NY 1464’ (unpatented)

11 23

N01.28
‘Rush’ × ‘Cosford’


‘NYF-20’ (unpatented)

14 25

N02.22
‘NY 157’ o.p.


‘NYF-45’ (unpatented)
12 ?
N05.47
‘Snyder’ × ‘NY 485’


‘Barcelona’ (unpatented)

 1 2


possibly was ‘Gustav's


‘Cosford’ (unpatented)

 3 11


Zeller’


‘DuChilly’ (unpatented)

10
14


syn. ‘Italian Red’


‘Hall's Giant’ (unpatented)

 5
15





‘Red Lambert’
unknown




(unpatented)





‘White Lambert’

 5
10





(unpatented)





‘Gustav's Zeller’

15
20





(unpatented)





‘Rush’ (unpatented)

12 23


by exam of progeny









The male parent ‘OSU 226.118’ is an unreleased selection.


‘OSU 541.147’ was asexually reproduced by rooted suckers in 1997 through 2006 in Corvallis, Oreg. The unique features of this new Corylus are stable and reproduced true-to-type in successive generations of asexual reproduction.


SUMMARY

The following traits have been observed and are determined to be the unique characteristics of ‘OSU 541.147’. These characteristics in combination distinguish ‘OSU 541.147’ as a distinct cultivar:

    • 1. Vigorous and upright plant habit.
    • 2. Green to dark-green color of developing and fully expanded leaves during the spring and summer.
    • 3. High level of resistance to eastern filbert blight (EFB) caused by the fungus Anisogramma anomala (Peck) E. Müller. The source of this resistance is from C. americana ‘Rush’ (unpatented; Bhattarai, et al., 2017), which differs from the single dominant allele conferred from ‘Gasaway’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al., 1991), which protects Corylus avellana ‘McDonald’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 28,200, Mehlenbacher et al., 2016), ‘Wepster’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 27,141, Mehlenbacher et al., 2014), ‘Dorris’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 25,022, Mehlenbacher et al., 2014), ‘Jefferson’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al., 2011a), ‘Yamhill’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al., 2009), and several other Corylus avellana cultivars and pollenizers.
    • 4. Expression of incompatibility alleles S8 and S23 in the styles.


Comparisons in several replicated plantings in Corvallis, Oreg., Cream Ridge, N.J., and East Brunswick, N.J., show that plants of ‘OSU 541.147’ differed from plants of the Corylus avellana cultivars ‘Barcelona’ (unpatented), ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ (unpatented), ‘Yamhill’, ‘Jefferson’, ‘McDonald’, ‘Wepster’ and other cultivars and selections of Corylus avellana known to the Inventors, primarily in their response to EFB present in New Jersey, a region where the pathogen is native and highly genetically diverse (Muehlbauer et al., 2019). They also differed in S-alleles, nut size, kernel percentage (ratio of kernel weight to nut weight), frequency of defects (blank nuts, moldy kernels, twin kernels, etc.), time of pollen shed, and length of the husk or involucre.


For example:


Eastern filbert blight response in New Jersey: In a multi-year trial in East Brunswick, N.J., ‘OSU 541.147’ showed no eastern filbert blight compared to the proportion of EFB-diseased wood across the canopy calculated to be 20.4% for ‘Yamhill’, 31.2% for ‘Jefferson’, 48.6% for ‘Gasaway’, and 67.0% for ‘Barcelona’.


Pollen shed: ‘OSU 541.147’ generally sheds pollen in East Brunswick, N.J., a week after ‘Ratoli’ (unpatented, minor cultivar from Tarragona, Spain), 2-3 days after ‘Yamhill’ and ‘Santiam’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al., 2007), and 2-3 days prior to ‘Jefferson’ and ‘Gasaway’. In Corvallis, Oreg., OSU 541.147 sheds pollen between ‘McDonald’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 28,200) and ‘PollyO’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 32,459). ‘OSU 541.147’=descriptor-5.


Husk Length: ‘OSU 541.147’ is 1.6 times nut length, slightly shorter than ‘Barcelona’, while ‘Wepster’ is 2.0 times nut length. Husks have glandular trichomes.


‘OSU 541.147’ produces small kernels that are suitable for the blanched kernel market for use in confections and baked goods. ‘OSU 541.147’ combines resistance to eastern filbert blight (evaluated against Anisogramma anomala present in New Jersey, Oregon, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and Minnesota [Molnar et al., 2010a]) with round nuts and kernels and moderately good kernel blanching. The tree is vigorous with an upright habit that produces a desirable orchard tree when pruned to a single stem.


Field observations in Corvallis, Oreg., Cream Ridge, N.J., and East Brunswick, N.J., and results from greenhouse-based inoculations performed in New Brunswick, N.J., indicate that ‘OSU 541.147’ expresses resistance to EFB caused by the fungus Anisogramma anomala. The resistance is conferred by the single dominant allele from Corylus americana ‘Rush’, found on hazelnut linkage group 7 (Bhattarai et al., 2017), which is unlike the cultivars currently grown in Oregon protected by the single dominant ‘Gasaway’ resistance allele found on linkage group 6 (Mehlenbacher et al., 2006). EFB is now present throughout the Willamette Valley of Oregon where 99% of the U.S. hazelnut crop is grown and is endemic to the eastern U.S. and southern Canada, where it has severely limited commercial production of European hazelnut. Fungicide applications and pruning to remove cankers are currently used to manage the disease in orchards of ‘Barcelona’ and other susceptible cultivars in the Pacific Northwestern U.S. ‘OSU 541.147’ was selected in the Willamette Valley of Oregon and subsequently evaluated in New Jersey and is adapted to the climate in both regions. ‘OSU 541.147’ is suitable for planting in areas with high EFB disease pressure. It has shown resistance in the eastern U.S. where the EFB fungus is native and genetically diverse (Muehlbauer et al., 2019).


The foregoing and other objects and features of the disclosure will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying color photographs illustrate the overall appearance of the new cultivar, showing the colors as true as it is reasonably possible to obtain in colored reproductions of this type. Foliage colors in the photographs may differ slightly from the color values cited in the detailed botanical description which accurately describe the colors of the new Corylus.



FIG. 1 shows the pedigree of new cultivar ‘OSU 541.147’.



FIG. 2 shows a tree of the new cultivar ‘OSU 541.147’ hazelnut in July of the seventh leaf pruned to a single trunk.



FIG. 3 shows immature nuts and husks of ‘Yamhill’, ‘OSU 541.147’ and ‘Barcelona’ in July of the seventh leaf.



FIG. 4 shows mature nuts and husks of ‘OSU 541.147’ growing in New Jersey.



FIG. 5 shows nuts, raw kernels, and blanched kernels of hazelnuts ‘Yamhill’, ‘OSU 541.147’ and ‘Barcelona’. Top row nuts, rows 2 and 3 raw kernels, rows 4 and 5 blanched kernels.



FIG. 6 shows the time of female receptivity (bottom, red), pollen shed (top, green), and vegetative budbreak of ‘OSU 541.147’ and other hazelnut cultivars in Corvallis, Oreg. (December 2018-March 2019).



FIG. 7 shows the time of female receptivity (bottom, red), pollen shed (top, green), and vegetative budbreak of ‘OSU 541.147’ and other hazelnut cultivars in East Brunswick, N.J. (December 2017 to March 2018).



FIG. 8 shows the time of female receptivity (bottom, red), pollen shed (top, green), and vegetative budbreak of ‘OSU 541.147’ and other hazelnut cultivars in East Brunswick, N.J. (December 2018 to March 2019).





SEQUENCE LISTING

The nucleic acid sequences listed in the accompanying sequence listing are shown using standard letter abbreviations for nucleotide bases as defined in 37 C.F.R. 1.822. Only one strand of each nucleic acid sequence is shown, but the complementary strand is understood as included by any reference to the displayed strand. In the accompanying sequence listing:


SEQ ID NOS: 1-40 are primer sequences that can be used for genetic fingerprinting.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The cultivar ‘OSU 541.147’ has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. The phenotype may vary somewhat with variations in environment such as temperature and light intensity, without, however, any variance in genotype. The aforementioned photographs and following observations and measurements describe plants grown in East Brunswick, N.J., under commercial practice outdoors in the field during the spring and summer. The plant used for the photographs and description were from a seven-year-old tree propagated by tie-off layerage and growing on its own roots. In the following description, color references are made to The Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, 1966 Edition, except where otherwise noted and where general terms of ordinary dictionary significance are used. The list of UPOV descriptors are from the Mar. 28, 1979 Hazelnut guidelines from UPOV.

  • Botanical classification: Corylus cultivar ‘OSU 541.147’.
  • Parentage: Female, or seed, parent is ‘NY 616’ (Corylus americana x Corylus avellana). It was selected from a cross of Corylus americana ‘Rush’ x Corylus avellana ‘Barcelona’ (Slate, 1930). ‘Rush’ is a Corylus americana selection from southeastern Pennsylvania. ‘Barcelona’ is an old Corylus avellana cultivar from Spain that is widely distributed in Europe and was introduced in the U.S. in about 1885 (Mehlenbacher and Miller, 1989). ‘Barcelona’ is more than 200 years old and is known under several different names, including ‘Castanyera’ in Tarragona (Spain), ‘Grande’ in Asturias (Spain), ‘Grada de Viseu’ in Portugal, and ‘Fertile de Coutard’ in France. ‘Rush’ has been shown to transmit a dominant allele for resistance to EFB, which has been mapped to a different linkage group than the allele from ‘Gasaway’. The ‘Rush’ allele that protects ‘OSU 541.147’ has been shown to provide resistance in the presence of multiple populations of the EFB fungus Anisogramma anomala (Molnar et al., 2010a, 2019; Bhattarai et al., 2017). Male, or pollen, parent is Corylus avellana ‘OSU 226.118’ (unpatented breeding selection). ‘OSU 226.118’ is the result of the cross of ‘Tombul Ghiaghli’ (unpatented, Greek origin) x OSU 42.103 (unpatented). ‘OSU 42.103’ is the result of a cross of ‘Montebello’ (unpatented) x ‘Compton’ (unpatented).
  • Incompatibility alleles: ‘OSU 541.147’ has incompatibility alleles S8 and S23. Hazelnuts are a wind-pollinated, monoecious species that exhibit a sporophytic self-incompatibility system controlled by a single locus designated as the S-locus with 33 alleles (Mehlenbacher, 2014). To develop ‘OSU 541.147’, branches of ‘NY 616’ were emasculated and covered to prevent foreign pollen contamination. Controlled pollinations used a mixture of pollens of three breeding selections whose S-alleles were known: ‘OSU 55.129’ (S2, S4), ‘OSU 167.002’ (S3, S10) and ‘OSU 226.118’ (S1, S8). Fluorescence microscopy identified the male parent of ‘OSU 541.147’ (S8, S23) as ‘OSU 226.118’ because of the common allele S8. For comparison, Corylus avellana ‘Sacajawea’ has the alleles S1 and S22. ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ has the alleles S2 and S23, ‘Tonda Pacifica’ (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 22,715, Mehlenbacher et al., 2011b) and ‘Wepster’ have alleles S1 and S2, and ‘McDonald’ has alleles S2 and S15. Corylus americana ‘Rush’ has alleles S12 and S23.
  • Propagation (type rooted suckers):
      • Time to initiate roots.—About 30 days at 20° C.
      • Time to produce a rooted young plant.—About six months at 22° C.
      • Root description.—Fine to thick; freely branching; creamy white in color.
  • Propagation (type whip grafting):
      • Time to budbreak on the scions.—About 14 days at 25° C.
      • Time to produce a grafted plant.—About six months at 25° C.
  • Plant description (descriptions are from plants grown in New Jersey unless otherwise noted):
      • General appearance.—Natural habit is perennial shrub, but in commercial orchards, is a single trunk tree. Upright plant habit. See FIG. 2.
      • Growth and branching habit.—Freely branching; about 15 lateral branches develop per plant. Pinching, that is, removal of the terminal apices, enhances branching with lateral branches potentially forming at every node.
      • Vigor.—Vigorous, upright growth habit.
      • Size.—Plant height is about 3.6 meters; plants grown in Oregon: plant diameter or spread is about 3.2 meters (in July, seventh leaf).
      • Trunk at 30 cm above the soil line.—In a trial planted in Corvallis, Oreg. in 2014, trunk diameter was 7.90 cm and cross-sectional area was 49 cm2 in December, 2019. This is slightly smaller than ‘Jefferson’ in the same trial.
      • Trunk color.—197B.
  • Lateral branch description:
      • Length.—About 20.4 cm. Ranges from 14.0 cm to 26.0 cm.
      • Diameter.—About 4.3 mm. Ranges from 3.0 mm to 5.0 mm.
      • Internode length (at base).—About 0.75 cm.
      • Internode length (at tip).—About 3.6 cm. Ranges from 2.5 cm to 5.0 cm.
      • Texture.—Smooth, pubescent.
      • Strength.—Strong.
      • Color, immature.—143C.
      • Color, mature.—146B.
      • Color of previous seasons branches.—199C.
  • Foliage description:
      • Arrangement.—Alternate, simple.
      • Length.—About 9.6 cm. Ranges from 7.5 cm to 11.5 cm.
      • Width.—About 7.1 cm. Ranges from 6.0 cm to 9.0 cm.
      • Shape.—Oblong to ovate.
      • Apex.—Obtuse to acute.
      • Base.—Cordate.
      • Margin.—Serrate.
      • Texture, upper and lower surfaces.—Slightly pubescent.
      • Venation pattern.—Pinnate.
      • Color.—Developing foliage — upper surface 144A, lower surfaces, 144B. Fully expanded foliage — upper surface: spring and summer, 137B; late summer and fall, 137B. Fully expanded foliage, lower surface: spring and summer, 137D; late summer and fall, 137D. Venation, upper surface: spring and summer, 145A; late summer and fall, 145A.
      • Venation, lower surface.—Spring and summer, 145A; late summer and fall, 145A.
  • Leaf bud description:
      • Shape.—Globular.
      • Time of leaf budbreak.—Medium, Descriptor-5. ‘OSU 541.147’ budbreak is about 8 days before ‘Jefferson’, four days after ‘Yamhill’, and concurrent with ‘Santiam’.
      • Color of leaf buds.—145B.
      • Leaf bud shape (winter).—Ovoid, Descriptor-2.
      • Leaf bud color (winter).—Reddish green, Descriptor-2.
  • Petiole description:
      • Length.—About 9.3 mm. Ranges from 8.0 cm to 15.0 mm.
      • Diameter.—About 1.8 mm. Ranges from 1.0 mm to 2.0 mm.
      • Texture, upper and lower surfaces.—Pubescent.
      • Color of petiole.—143C.
  • Flower description:
      • Male inflorescences.—Catkins
      • Color prior to elongation.—176D.
      • Catkin length.—31.7 mm.
      • Female inflorescence style color.—047B.
      • Time of female flowering.—Medium (January 20 to February 10), Descriptor-5.
      • Time of female flowering compared to male flowering.—Protogyny, Descriptor-1.
      • Involucre constriction.—The involucre is not constricted, Descriptor-1.
      • Involucre length.—1.6 times length of nut, Descriptor-7.
      • Size of husk indentation.—Medium, Descriptor-7 (similar to ‘Negret’), about 50% of husk length.
      • Strength of serration of indentation.—Medium, Descriptor-5.
      • Thickness of callus at base.—Thick, Descriptor-7, (similar to ‘Barcelona’) or about 2 mm.
      • Pubescence on husk.—Present, Descriptor-9.
      • Density of hairiness of involucre.—Strong, Descriptor-7.
      • Jointing of bracts.—On one side, Descriptor-2.
  • Nut description:
      • Length.—Average 17.4 mm.
      • Width.—Average 17.5 mm.
      • Depth.—Average 14.7 mm.
      • Nut shape.—Globular, Descriptor-2. See FIG. 5.
      • Nut shape index.—(Width+Depth)/2*Length=0.92.
      • Nut compression index.—(Width/Depth)=1.19.
      • Nut weight.—2.62 g (in Corvallis, Oreg.).
      • Kernel weight.—1.16 g (in Corvallis, Oreg.).
      • Kernel percentage (kernel weight/nut weight).—44.1% (in Corvallis, Oreg.).
      • Number of fruits per cluster.—Three to four. See FIGS. 3 and 4.
      • Nutshell coloration.—165A.
      • Number of stripes on shell.—Medium (about 20), Descriptor-5.
      • Shape of fruit apex.—Flat, Descriptor-1.
      • Prominence of fruit apex.—Slightly prominent, Descriptor-3.
      • Size of fruit pistil scar on shell.—Medium, Descriptor-5.
      • Hairiness of top of fruit.—Medium, Descriptor-5.
      • Curvature of nut basal scar.—Flat, Descriptor-3 (small) and similar to ‘Negret’. The raised part of the shell has dimensions 3.3×1.4 mm.
      • Size of basal scar.—Descriptor-5. Average measurements 14.3×13.4 mm.
      • Double kernels.—Absent.
      • Kernel shape.—Globular, Descriptor-2.
      • Shape of kernel in cross-section.—Circular, Descriptor-2.
      • Lateral groove in kernel.—Present.
      • Corkiness of pellicle of kernel.—Slightly corky, Descriptor-3.
      • Color of the fiber on the kernel.—165A (Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart Fifth Edition, 2007).
      • Color of the pellicle under the fiber.—165B (Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart Fifth Edition, 2007).
  • Disease/pest resistance: Plants of ‘OSU 541.147’ are resistant to EFB caused by the fungus Anisogramma anomala (Peck) E. Müller. Plants have not been challenged against all populations of Anisogramma anomala present in North America (Muehlbauer et al., 2019); however, ‘OSU 541.147’ has been challenged in field trials and/or greenhouse inoculations with populations from Oregon, New Jersey, Minnesota, Michigan, Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania, and no signs or symptoms of EFB have been observed (Capik and Molnar, 2012; Molnar et al., 2010a). Resistance is derived from its grandparent ‘Rush’. ‘OSU 541.147’ has been trialed in New Jersey since 2002 under high disease pressure with no signs or symptoms of EFB observed (Capik and Molnar, 2012; Molnar et al., 2010a, 2019). In Oregon, all trees of ‘OSU 541.147’ have remained free of EFB. Fungicide applications are not expected to be needed to control EFB. Susceptibility to bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. corylina has not been quantified, but no trees in the trials in Oregon and New Jersey were affected. Susceptibility to bud mite (Phytoptus avellanae Nal.) was rated in trials in Corvallis, Oreg., in mid-December on a scale of 1 (no blasted buds) to 5 (many blasted buds). The average rating for ‘OSU 541.147’ was 3.5, indicating moderate susceptibility comparable to ‘Clark’ and ‘Gamma’ (Table 2). With this rating, chemical control of mites will occasionally be needed. Buds blasted by bud mites have not been observed on ‘OSU 541.147’ in New Jersey.









TABLE 2





Performance of 17 genotypes in a replicated trial planted


in Corvallis in Spring, 2014. Four trees per selection


in a randomized complete block design.

















Sel

Yield (kg/tree)












No
Selection
2017
2018
2019
Total





1
‘OSU 541.147’
0.37
2.87
4.58
8.00


2
‘1250.057’
1.58
2.70
3.70
7.98


3
‘1252.068’
0.75
3.46
3.93
8.15


4
‘1253.064’
0.77
2.40
2.24
5.41


5
‘1292.065’
1.33
2.99
4.83
9.14


6
‘1300.073’
1.96
3.33
4.51
9.80


7
‘1304.039’
1.78
2.94
3.62
8.35


8
‘1307.003’
1.23
3.30
5.06
9.58


9
‘1307.055’
1.35
3.93
4.06
9.34


10
‘1308.087’
1.15
3.70
4.81
9.65


11
‘1310.022’
0.64
2.34
2.16
5.14


12
‘1339.074’
1.17
3.89
4.55
9.60


13
‘1340.018’
1.25
4.94
4.53
10.71


14
‘1341.037’
1.06
2.08
4.72
7.85


15
‘Jefferson’
2.39
4.77
4.60
11.75


16
‘McDonald’
0.78
3.90
5.86
10.53


17
‘Wepster’
2.16
4.59
5.33
12.08



LSD (0.05)
0.57
0.95
1.14
1.81















Sel

Trunk
Trunk




No
Selection
diameter
TCA
Yield efficiency
Bud mite rating





1
‘OSU 541.147’
7.89
49.03
0.164
3.50


2
‘1250.057’
8.39
55.29
0.143
1.70


3
‘1252.068’
8.42
55.74
0.146
1.80


4
‘1253.064’
6.76
35.97
0.151
1.40


5
‘1292.065’
7.79
47.80
0.192
3.10


6
‘1300.073’
9.24
67.11
0.146
1.00


7
‘1304.039’
6.82
36.56
0.229
1.10


8
‘1307.003’
8.90
62.34
0.152
1.10


9
‘1307.055’
7.71
46.73
0.200
3.10


10
‘1308.087’
9.20
66.61
0.144
2.30


11
‘1310.022’
7.97
49.99
0.104
1.00


12
‘1339.074’
9.04
64.61
0.149
1.10


13
‘1340.018’
9.48
70.74
0.151
1.10


14
‘1341.037’
11.26
99.64
0.079
2.80


15
‘Jefferson’
8.19
52.90
0.222
1.30


16
‘McDonald’
9.74
60.07
0.177
2.10


17
‘Wepster’
8.63
58.84
0.210
1.60



LSD (0.05)
0.65
8.78
0.033
1.14





Yield per tree in each year of evaluation and total of 3 years. There were very few nuts in 2016 and they were not harvested.


Trunk diameter in cm, 30 cm above the soil line, calculated from circumference.


TCA = Trunk cross-sectional area in cm2, calculated from circumference 30 cm above the soil line.


Yield efficiency is the ratio of total yield per tree divided by trunk cross-sectional area (units kg/cm2).


Bud mite susceptibility rated in mid-December on a scale of 1 (no blasted buds) to 5 (many blasted buds).






  • Temperature tolerance: ‘OSU 541.147’ was selected in Corvallis, Oreg., and further evaluated in Cream Ridge, N.J. and East Brunswick, N.J., and is targeted for production in USDA Plant Hardiness Zones 6a to 7b. Plants of the new Corylus avellana have been observed to tolerate temperatures from −21 to 38° C.



COMPARATIVE DATA

Disease resistance: ‘OSU 541.147’ differs from existing Corylus avellana cultivars based on its source and type of resistance to eastern filbert blight (EFB) caused by Anisogramma anomala. Commercial cultivars previously widely grown in Oregon including ‘Barcelona’ (unpatented), ‘Ennis’ (unpatented), ‘Daviana’ (unpatented), ‘Butler’ (unpatented), etc. are highly susceptible to EFB and cannot be grown in the eastern U.S. without copious applications of chemical fungicides and heavy pruning to remove infected wood. Tree death can occur in the eastern U.S. within five years of exposure to the fungus. The more recently developed cultivars ‘Santiam’ , ‘Yamhill’, ‘Jefferson’, ‘Dorris’, ‘Wepster’, and ‘McDonald’ and their associated pollenizers are protected from EFB by a single resistance gene conferred from Corylus avellana ‘Gasaway’. This gene provides a high level of resistance in Oregon and Washington where the diversity of the fungus is limited (Muehlbauer et al., 2019), but does not provide a similar level of protection from disease in the eastern U.S. where the pathogen is endemic and genetically diverse (Capik and Molnar, 2012; Molnar et al., 2010b; Muehlbauer et al., 2018). ‘OSU 541.147’ does not carry the single ‘Gasaway’ resistance allele. It carries the Corylus americana ‘Rush’ allele, which is a different gene on a different chromosome than ‘Gasaway’ (Bhattarai, et al., 2017). The allele from ‘Rush’ has been found to be very effective against the populations of Anisogramma anomala present in New Jersey and other locations (Molnar et al., 2010a, 2019).


In a multi-year trial in East Brunswick, N.J., completed in winter 2018 and spanning more than 8 years of exposure to EFB, the average proportion of diseased wood (total length of EFB-diseased stems per tree divided by total length of shoot growth) for ‘OSU 541.147’ was 0.0% (no EFB) compared to 20.4% for ‘Yamhill’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al 2009), 31.2% for ‘Jefferson’ (unpatented, Mehlenbacher et al. 2011a), and 48.6% for ‘Gasaway’ (unpatented). Previous studies in New Jersey showed the proportion of diseased wood of ‘Barcelona’ to be 67.0%, ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ 39%, and ‘Sacajawea’ 21% (Capik and Molnar, 2012).


Differences were also observed in the number of cankers and average canker length for ‘OSU 541.147’ in comparison to ‘Yamhill’, ‘Jefferson’, and ‘Gasaway’ in the study completed in 2018. ‘OSU 541.147’ expressed no cankers. In contrast, ‘Gasaway’ exhibited an average of 93.0 cankers per tree with an average length of 130.8 cm, ‘Jefferson’ exhibited an average of 36.9 cankers per tree with an average length of 72.3 cm, and ‘Yamhill’ exhibited an average of 40.5 cankers per tree with an average length of 37.9 cm. As reported in Capik and Molnar (2012), and as a further point of comparison in regard to EFB response, ‘Barcelona’ exhibited an average of 20.4 cankers per tree with an average length of 61.9 cm, ‘Tonda di Giffoni’ exhibited an average of 39.0 cankers per tree with an average length of 24.5 cm, and ‘Sacajawea’ exhibited an average of 7.7 cankers per tree with an average length of 21.5 cm (Capik and Molnar, 2012).


Nut and kernel characteristics. ‘OSU 541.147’ hazelnut is targeted for the blanched kernel market and specifically for nut production in the eastern United States in USDA Plant Hardiness Zones 6a to 7b where most existing cultivars of Corylus avellana cannot be grown due to the impacts of EFB.


As shown in FIG. 5, the nut shape is round to somewhat oblong. Kernels are round. The average single nut weight for ‘OSU 541.147’ over three years (2017-19) is 2.62 g, average single kernel weight is 1.16 g, with an average kernel percentage of 44.1% (FIG. 4, Table 3). Nut weight in the same trial was 3.77 g for ‘Jefferson’, 2.67 g for ‘McDonald’ and 2.49 g for ‘Wepster’. Kernel weights in the same trial were 1.70 g for ‘Jefferson’, 1.39 g for ‘McDonald’ and 1.17 g for ‘Wepster’. Kernel percentage in the same trial was 45.2% for ‘Jefferson’, 52.3% for ‘McDonald’ and 47.0% for ‘Wepster’. ‘OSU 541.147’ nuts and kernels are significantly smaller than those of ‘Barcelona’ and ‘Jefferson’, and intermediate between ‘McDonald’ and ‘Wepster’. In a previous trial (Mehlenbacher et al., 2008), ‘Barcelona’ had an average nut weight of 3.85 g, average single kernel weight of 1.66 g, and an average kernel percentage of 43.1%.


In the trial planted in 2014 in Corvallis, Oreg., ‘Barcelona’ had an average single nut weight of 3.77 g, an average single kernel weight of 1.70, and an average kernel percentage of 45.2%. The trees produced a few nuts in 2016, but were not harvested. Nuts were harvested for three years (2017-19), dried, weighed and evaluated. Total nut weight per tree (2017-19) was 8.0 kg for OSU 541.147, which is less than for the checks ‘Jefferson’, ‘McDonald’ and ‘Wepster’ (Table 2). Trunk cross-sectional area (TCA) was 49.03 cm2, or slightly smaller than ‘Jefferson’. Yield efficiency, the ratio of total yield to TCA, was a respectable 0.164 kg/cm2 and similar to ‘McDonald’ (0.177 kg/cm2). Trees have an upright growth habit, and vigor similar to C. avellana selections in the Corvallis trials.


Raw kernels of ‘OSU 541.147’ have a medium brown pellicle with a large amount of attached fiber (average rating was 4.0 on a scale of 1 [no fiber] to 4 [much fiber]; Table 3). Pellicle removal after roasting at 150° C. for 15 min and rubbing is rated on a scale of 1 (complete pellicle removal) to 7 (no pellicle removal). Slightly less than half of the pellicle on ‘OSU 541.147’ kernels is generally removed after roasting with an average rating of 4.5 (Table 3), a value similar to ‘Barcelona’ (4.2 out of 7.0 as described in Mehlenbacher et al., 2008) and ‘Yamhill’ (4.1 out of 7.0 as described in Mehlenbacher et al. 2011a). In the trial planted in 2014, pellicle removal after roasting was better for ‘McDonald’ (3.7 out of 7) and ‘Wepster’ (3.0 out of 7) (Table 3).


The average percentage of good kernels (kernels free of defects) was calculated for ‘OSU 541.147’ in the trial planted in 2014 and found to be 85.3% (Table 3). There was on average 9.3% blank nuts, 0.3% moldy kernels, 2.4% nuts with shriveled kernels, and 2.5% poorly filled. The percentage of good kernels for ‘OSU 541.147’ was considerably higher than that reported for ‘Barcelona’ in multiple reports from Oregon (60.9% good kernels reported in Mehlenbacher et al. [2008] and 69.4% in Mehlenbacher et al. [2013]). The average percentage of good kernels for ‘OSU 541.147’ grown in New Jersey is slightly lower than the range reported in Oregon for ‘Yamhill’, ‘Jefferson’, ‘Dorris’, and ‘McDonald’, however the percentage of moldy nuts was generally higher for these cultivars. The incidence of twin kernels and moldy kernels with black tips is less than 0.1% in both OR and NJ.









TABLE 3





Performance of 17 genotypes in a replicated trial planted


in Corvallis in Spring, 2014. Four trees per selection in a


randomized complete block design.





















Sel

10-nut
10-kernel
Percent




No
Selection
weight
weight
kernel
Fiber
Blanching





1
‘OSU
26.2
11.6
44.1
4.0
4.5



541.147’







2
‘1250.057’
36.9
16.4
44.5
3.4
4.2


3
‘1252.068’
25.7
12.4
48.3
2.6
2.8


4
‘1253.064’
28.4
13.0
45.9
1.9
3.0


5
‘1292.065’
28.2
13.1
46.6
3.5
4.3


6
‘1300.073’
25.2
12.9
51.1
2.6
4.2


7
‘1304.039’
27.5
12.4
45.1
2.2
3.0


8
‘1307.003’
23.7
11.9
50.2
1.0
3.0


9
‘1307.055’
25.7
12.9
50.4
2.2
4.8


10
‘1308.087’
30.2
13.3
44.1
2.9
4.9


11
‘1310.022’
28.8
14.0
48.7
3.5
4.9


12
‘1339.074’
30.5
14.6
47.9
2.0
5.8


13
‘1340.018’
27.9
13.9
49.7
3.1
3.3


14
‘1341.037’
30.4
13.5
44.3
2.3
2.1


15
‘Jefferson’
37.7
17.0
45.2
2.8
4.1


16
‘McDonald’
26.7
13.9
52.3
2.6
3.7


17
‘Wepster’
24.9
11.7
47.0
2.9
3.0



LSD (0.05)
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.2












Sel

Frequency (%)
















No
Selection
GD
BL
BS
MO
SF
PF
TW
BT





1
‘OSU
85.3
9.3
0.3
0.3
2.4
2.5
0.1
0.0



541.147’










2
‘1250.057’
85.4
4.8
0.3
2.0
1.1
6.0
0.5
0.1


3
‘1252.068’
83.7
5.9
1.5
2.1
0.8
4.3
0.5
1.6


4
‘1253.064’
84.4
6.6
1.8
3.4
1.8
3.3
0.6
1.0


5
‘1292.065’
83.1
9.8
0.1
1.8
0.3
4.9
0.3
0.2


6
‘1300.073’
83.6
3.5
1.8
3.5
1.6
3.9
0.2
2.3


7
‘1304.039’
84.5
4.8
0.8
2.5
1.4
5.4
0.3
0.5


8
‘1307.003’
86.5
7.9
0.3
2.2
1.5
2.1
0.0
0.3


9
‘1307.055’
73.6
8.2
0.2
2.6
1.1
13.0
1.3
0.7


10
‘1308.087’
76.7
6.8
0.0
1.8
5.5
5.7
0.1
0.3


11
‘1310.022’
86.9
3.4
0.1
0.5
0.5
1.7
6.0
1.9


12
‘1339.074’
81.7
4.9
0.7
1.4
1.2
10.3
0.3
0.2


13
‘1340.018’
73.0
4.8
0.3
2.1
3.4
16.3
0.1
0.2


14
‘1341.037’
88.2
2.6
1.0
2.6
1.8
3.1
0.5
0.5


15
‘Jefferson’
76.5
3.8
2.0
2.2
1.3
13.8
0.6
1.0


16
‘McDonald’
86.0
3.8
0.5
2.3
4.0
3.3
0.1
0.0


17
‘Wepster’
80.3
7.6
0.2
1.3
0.7
8.7
0.0
1.4



LSD (0.05)
3.0
1.9
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.7
0.6
0.8





Weight of ten well-filled nuts, and ten kernels in grams.


Percent kernel = (kernel weight/nut weight)‘100, based on well-filled nuts.


Fiber on the kernel pellicle is rated from 1 (none) to 4 (heavy fiber).


Blanching (pellicle removal) is rated from 1 (complete pellicle removal) to 7 (no pellicle removal) after roasting at 275° F. for 15-20 minutes and rubbing.


Frequency of good nuts and 7 types of defects is from two 50-nut samples per tree, averaged over four trees and three years of observation. GD = good kernels, BL = blanks, BS = brown stain, MO = moldy kernels, SH = shriveled kernels, PF = poorly filled nuts, TW = twins, and BT = kernels with black tips.






Nut maturity date. The nuts of ‘OSU 541.147’ are typically borne in clusters of 3-4 in husks about 60% longer than the nuts. The husks open as they dry at maturity. About 85% of the nuts fall free of the husk at maturity (range 75-90%). The other 15% of the nuts come out of the husks as they move through the harvester. When mature, the shells are medium brown in color (165A). Harvest date on average is a few days later than ‘Jefferson’ when grown in East Brunswick, N.J., and Corvallis, Oreg. (Table 4).


Incompatibility and pollinizers. The trees set a moderate to high number of catkins that shed pollen in early season 2-3 days after to ‘Yamhill’. Pollen has been collected and germinated on agar medium and both quantity and viability appear to be good. ‘OSU 541.147’ has incompatibility alleles S8 and S23 as determined by fluorescence microscopy. Both alleles are expressed in the female flowers but only S8 is expressed in the pollen due to dominance. By convention, alleles expressed in the pollen are underlined.









TABLE 4







Harvest dates (2018 and 2019) in the replicated trial planted in


Corvallis in 2014, and estimated percentage of nuts on


the ground (vs. in the tree) on that date. Also shown for the nuts on


the ground is an estimated percentage of nuts free of the husk.








2018 Harvest
2019 Harvest
















%
%


%
%


Selection
Date
down
free
Selection
Date
down
free





‘05U541.147’
10/5
76
80
‘541.147’
10/7
82
88


‘1252.068’
10/4
98
98
‘1252.068’
10/3
93
91


‘1341.037’
9/28
93
98
‘1341.037’
9/23
99
97


‘Barcelona’
10/8
97
96
‘Barcelona’
10/8
99
94


‘Jefferson’
10/5
90
83
‘Jefferson’
10/7
94
84


‘McDonald’
9/20
92
97
‘McDonald’
9/23
99
97


‘Wepster’
10/5
99
96
‘Wepster’
9/23
96
76









In Corvallis, Oreg., time of pollen shed and female receptivity were recorded weekly from early December 2018 to late March 2019 (FIG. 6). Climatic conditions vary each year and impact dates of bloom but not usually the order of progression of bloom among cultivars. In 2019, pollen shed (time of male flowering) of ‘OSU 541.147’ began on January 25 and ended on February 25, with peak pollen shed on February 10; those dates are between those for ‘Wepster’ and ‘PollyO’. The females reached the red dot stage on January 15 and remained receptive until February 15. Female receptivity spans a shorter time within the receptivity time of females of ‘Wepster’ and ‘PollyO’. In East Brunswick, N.J., time of pollen shed and female receptivity were recorded weekly from early December 2017 to late March 2018 (FIG. 7) and from early December 2018 to late March 2019 (FIG. 8). Pollen shed of ‘OSU 541.147’ was about one week later than ‘Jefferson’ and ten days later than ‘Yamhill’. Time of female receptivity overlapped the second half of ‘Yamhill’ and the first half of ‘Jefferson’. Females emerge in early season and are generally fully receptive around mid-February in New Jersey. Pollinizer cultivars that shed compatible pollen in midseason and late midseason are recommended, with hybrid hazelnut seedlings (Corylus americana x C. avellana) planted as pollenizers in eastern and northern regions where cold temperatures and fluctuating climatic conditions can affect pollen production of C. avellana. In New Jersey, date of leaf budbreak of ‘OSU 541.147’ was four days later than ‘Yamhill’ and seven days earlier than ‘Jefferson’. In Oregon, date of leaf budbreak of ‘OSU 541.147’ was with ‘PollyO’, one day before ‘McDonald’ and four days before ‘Wepster’.


Propagation. Layers of ‘OSU 541.147’ are vigorous and root well, similar to standard cultivars of Corylus avellana.


Additional comparative descriptors. Tables 5 and 6 provide additional descriptors distinguishing ‘OSU 541.147’ from various hazelnut varieties.









TABLE 5





Additional comparative descriptors distinguishing ‘OSU 541.147’ from


various hazelnut varieties, including measurements and RHS colors


(R.H.S. Colour chart, 1966 edition. Royal Horticultural Society


(Great Britain). British Colour Council, London).





















‘OSU




Character
Unit
541.147’
‘PollyO’
‘McDonald’





Lateral branch length
cm
20.4
45.6
33.5


(terminal shoot)






Lateral branch diameter
mm
4.3
4.4
5.0


(terminal shoot)






Internode length
cm
3.6
3.4
3.2


(above base)






Branch texture

smooth,
smooth.
smooth,




glabrous
glabrous
glabrous


Branch strength

strong
strong
strong


Branch color, immature
RHS
143C
139D
139D


Branch color, mature
RHS
146B
177D
177D


Leaf length
cm
9.6
13.3
10.4


Leaf width
cm
7.1
11.8
8.7


Leaf shape

oblong to
oblong to
oblong to




ovate
ovate
ovate


Leaf apex

obtuse to
obtuse to
obtuse to




acute
acute
acute


Leaf base

cordate
cordate
cordate


Leaf margin

serrate
senate
serrate


Leaf texture

slightly
slightly
slightly




pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


Leaf venation pattern

pinnate
pinnate
pinnate


Leaf color developing
RHS
144 A
141C
141C


leaf upper






Leaf color developing
RHS
144B
139C
139C


leaf lower






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
137B
146 A
139B


upper, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
137B
146 A
139B


upper, ea Fall






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
137D
146B
139C


lower, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
137D
146B
139C


lower, ea Fall






Leaf veins, upper.
RHS
145 A
146 A
139C


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, upper, ea Fall
RHS
145 A
146 A
139C


Leaf veins, lower.
RHS
145 A
146D
139D


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, lower, ea Fall
RHS
145 A
146D
139D


Petiole length
mm
9.3
16.3
27


Petiole diameter
mm
1.8
1.6
1.8


Petiole texture, upper &

pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


lower surfaces






Petiole color, upper.
RHS
143C
146C
139D


Spring Summer






Petiole color, upper, ea Fall
RHS
143C
146C
139D


Petiole color, lower,
RHS
143C
146D
139D


Spring Summer






Petiole color, lower, ea Fall
RHS
143C
146D
139D


Catkin color prior
RHS
ND
138B
176D


to elongation






Female flower style color
RHS
047B
047B
047B


Nut length
mm
19.9
19.5
18.4


Nut width
mm
18.8
19.8
18.9


Nut depth
mm
15.6
17.2
17.9


Nut shape

round
round
round


Nut shape index [(W + D)/2L]
ratio
0.86
0.95
1.00


Nut compression index (W/D)
ratio
1.21
1.15
1.05


Nut shell color
RHS
165A
164 A
164 A


Nut weight
g
2.62
2.88
2.51


Kernel weight
g
1.16
1.38
1.29


Kernel percentage (KW/NW)
%
44.1
47.9
51.5














Character
Unit
‘Wepster’
‘Felix’
‘York’





Lateral branch length
cm
40
43
38


(terminal shoot)






Lateral branch diameter
mm
5.4
6.0
6.0


(terminal shoot)






Internode length
cm
3.1
2.8
3.2


(above base)






Branch texture

smooth,
smooth,
smooth,




glabrous
glabrous
glabrous


Branch strength

strong
strong
strong


Branch color, immature
RHS
139D
152B
152B


Branch color, mature
RHS
177C
152B
199A?


Leaf length
cm
12.1
11
11


Leaf width
cm
10.9
10
10


Leaf shape

oblong to
oblong to
oblong to




ovate
ovate
ovate


Leaf apex

obtuse to
obtuse to
obtuse to




acute
acute
acute


Leaf base

cordate
cordate
cordate


Leaf margin

serrate
senate
serrate


Leaf texture

slightly
slightly
slightly




pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


Leaf venation pattern

pinnate
pinnate
pinnate


Leaf color developing
RHS
141C
144 A
146B


leaf upper






Leaf color developing
RHS
139C
145 A
146C


leaf lower






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
141B
143 A
146 A


upper, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
141A
143 A
146 A


upper, ea Fall






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
139C
139C
146C


lower, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
139C
139C
146C


lower, ea Fall






Leaf veins, upper.
RHS
139C
139C
146A


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, upper, ea Fall
RHS
139C
139C
146 A


Leaf veins, lower.
RHS
139D
139D
148D


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, lower, ea Fall
RHS
139D
139D
148D


Petiole length
mm
27
27
27


Petiole diameter
mm
1.8
1.8
1.8


Petiole texture, upper &

pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


lower surfaces






Petiole color, upper.
RHS
139D
139D
139D


Spring Summer






Petiole color, upper, ea Fall
RHS
139D
139D
139D


Petiole color, lower,
RHS
139D
139D
139D


Spring Summer






Petiole color, lower, ea Fall
RHS
139D
139D
139D


Catkin color prior
RHS
176C
194C shade,
194C


to elongation


176D sun



Female flower style color
RHS
047B
047B
047B


Nut length
mm
18.3
18.7
18.0


Nut width
mm
19.0
18.9
19.7


Nut depth
mm
16.6
16.7
17.0


Nut shape

round
round
round


Nut shape index [(W + D)/2L]
ratio
0.97
0.95
1.02


Nut compression index (W/D)
ratio
1.15
1.13
1.16


Nut shell color
RHS
164 A
167 A
164 A


Nut weight
g
2.39
2.65
2.73


Kernel weight
g
1.11
1.32
1.23


Kernel percentage (KW/NW)
%
43.9
50.1
46.3


















‘Bur-





‘Tonda
gundy


Character
Unit
‘Dorris’
Pacifica’
Lace’





Lateral branch length
cm
51
15
51


(terminal shoot)






Lateral branch diameter
mm
3.8
5.0
3.8


(terminal shoot)






Internode length
cm
3.3
1.3
3.3


(above base)






Branch texture

smooth,
smooth,
smooth,




glabrous
glabrous
glabrous


Branch strength

strong
strong
strong


Branch color, immature
RHS
152B
178 A
177D


Branch color, mature
RHS
152B
137 A
177C


Leaf length
cm
11
12
10.7


Leaf width
cm
10
10
7.8


Leaf shape

oblong to
oblong to
oblong to




ovate
ovate
ovate


Leaf apex

obtuse to
obtuse to
obtuse to




acute
acute
acute


Leaf base

cordate
cordate
cordate


Leaf margin

serrate
serrate
serrate


Leaf texture

slightly
slightly
slightly




pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


Leaf venation pattern

pinnate
pinnate
pinnate


Leaf color developing
RHS
144 A
187 A
187 A


leaf upper






Leaf color developing
RHS
145 A
187 A
183 A


leaf lower






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
143 A
183B
191A


upper, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
143 A
137 A
191B


upper, ea Fall






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
139C
178 A
191B


lower, Spr Sum






Leaf color fully expanded leaf
RHS
139C
137 A
139B


lower, ea Fall






Leaf veins, upper.
RHS
139C
183B
191A


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, upper, ea Fall
RHS
139C
137 A
139C


Leaf veins, lower.
RHS
139D
178 A
182B


Spring Summer






Leaf veins, lower, ea Fall
RHS
139D
138B
182D


Petiole length
mm
27
10
27


Petiole diameter
mm
1.8
2.5
1.8


Petiole texture, upper &

pubescent
pubescent
pubescent


lower surfaces






Petiole color, upper.
RHS
139D
183B
191A


Spring Summer






Petiole color, upper, ea Fall
RHS
139D
137 A
139C


Petiole color, lower,
RHS
139D
178 A
191A


Spring Summer






Petiole color, lower, ea Fall
RHS
139D
138B
139C


Catkin color prior
RHS
194C shade,
176B
177 A


to elongation

176D sun




Female flower style color
RHS
048B
183B
183B


Nut length
mm
19.1
19.0
15.8


Nut width
mm
20.7
18.0
15.6


Nut depth
mm
18.2
16.5
12.9


Nut shape

round
round
round


Nut shape index [(W + D)/2L]
ratio
1.02
0.91
0.85


Nut compression index (W/D)
ratio
1.14
1.09
1.21


Nut shell color
RHS
164B
164 A
166C


Nut weight
g
3.35
2.24
1.72


Kernel weight
g
1.40
1.06
0.76


Kernel percentage (KW/NW)
%
43
47
44
















TABLE 6





International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)


descriptors distinguishing ‘OSU 541.147’ from various hazelnut varieties.





















Character
‘OSU

‘Burgundy



No.
(UPOV Descriptor)
541.147’
‘PollyO’
Lace’
‘Dorris’





1
Plant vigor
5
7
5
4


2
Plant habit
1
5
5
7


3
Plant shoot density
5
5
5
5


4
Plant suckering
5
4
5
4


5
Shoot thickness
5
7
5
7


6
Shoot hairiness
7
3
3
5


7
Shoot lenticels
7
5
3
3


8
Leaf bud shape (winter)
Ovoid; 2
2
1
3


9
Leaf bud color (winter)
Reddish
143C,1
3
2




green; 2





10
Time of leaf budburst
6
6
6
6


11
Catkin length (mm)
20.1
20.1; 3
2
8



(winter)
mm; 3





12
Catkin color (winter)
138B; 1
138B.1
2
2


13
Stigma color
2
047B.1
3
2


14
Time of pollen shed
6
7
6
5


15
Time of female flowering
6
6
8
6


16
Dichogamy
2
2
3
2



(female vs. male)






17
Leaf blade shape
2
3
2
3


18
Leaf blade size
9.6 ×
13.3 ×
11.4 ×
7




7.1; 3
11.8;5
7.4; 1



19
Leaf blade hairiness
3
3

3



lower side






20
Petiole length
9.3
5
7
5




mm; 3





21
Petiole hairiness
7
3
3
5


22
Husk constriction
1
1
1
1


23
Husk length rcl. to nut
6
6
3
4



length






24
Husk indentation
7
5
5
7


25
Husk serration of
5
5
3
5



indentations






26
Husk thickness of
7
7
3
7



callus at base






27
Husk hairiness
9
9
1
9



(present, absent)






28
Husk hair density
8
3
3
3


29
Husk joining of bracts
1
1
1
2


30
Nuts per cluster
4
4
2
3


31
Nut size
3
4
2
5


32
Nut shape
3
1
3
1


33
Nut shape in cross-section
2
2
1
2


34
Nut shell color
3
2
3
2


35
Nut number of stripes
7
3
5
3



on shell






36
Nut shape of top
1
1
4
4


37
Nut apex prominence
7
3
3
3


38
Nut size of pistil scar
3
3
3
3


39
Nut hairiness of top
3
4
5
4


40
Nut size of basal scar
5
3
3
5


41
Nut curvature
3
2
3
2



of basal scar






42
Double kernels
1
1
1
1



(frequency)






43
Kernel size
3
5
2
6


44
Kernel shape
1
1
2
1


43
Kernel cross-section
2
2
1
2


46
Kernel shape of top
2
2
2
2


47
Kernel shape of base
3
3
2
3


48
Kernel lateral groove
1
1
1
1


49
Kernel fiber on skin
9
5
5
3


50
Kernel size of cavity
5
5
3
7


51
Nut ripening time
7
4
5
6


52
Nut adherence of
1
1
1
1



husk after drop






53
Nut percent kernel
3
6
3
3


54
Time of leaf fall
3
3
3
3



(November)
















Character


‘Wep-



No.
(UPOV Descriptor)
‘York’
‘Felix’
ster’
‘McDonald‘





1
Plant vigor
5
8
7
5


2
Plant habit
5
3
5
5


3
Plant shoot density
5
5
5
5


4
Plant suckering
4
5
3
6


5
Shoot thickness
7
7
5
5


6
Shoot hairiness
3
3
5
3


7
Shoot lenticels
5
3




8
Leaf bud shape (winter)
3
2




9
Leaf bud color (winter)
1
2




10
Time of leaf budburst
6
6
6
6


11
Catkin length (mm)
7
7
5
6



(winter)






12
Catkin color (winter)
2
2
1
1


13
Stigma color
1
1
1
1


14
Time of pollen shed
6
7
6
5


15
Time of female flowering
5
5
5
4


16
Dichogamy
2
1
1
1



(female vs. male)






17
Leaf blade shape
3
3
3
2


18
Leaf blade size
3
2
3
3


19
Leaf blade hairiness
3
3
3
3



lower side






20
Petiole length
5
5
5
5


21
Petiole hairiness
5
5
5
5


22
Husk constriction
1
3
1
1


23
Husk length rel. to
4
5
7
5



nut length






24
Husk indentation
7
5
7
7


25
Husk serration of
5
7
7
7



indentations






26
Husk thickness of
5
7
5
3



callus at base






27
Husk hairiness
9
9
9
9



(present, absent)






28
Husk hair density
3
3
3
3


29
Husk joining of bracts
2
2
2
2


30
Nuts per cluster
2
3
3
3


31
Nut size
4
4
3
4


32
Nut shape
1
1
1
1


33
Nut shape in cross-section
2
2
2
2


34
Nut shell color
2
3
2
2


35
Nut number of stripes
5
7
5
5



on shell






36
Nut shape of top
3
1
1
3


37
Nut apex prominence
3
5
3
5


38
Nut size of pistil scar
3
3
3
3


39
Nut hairiness of top
3
4
3
4


40
Nut size of basal scar
3
3
3
3


41
Nut curvature of basal scar
2
2
2
2


42
Double kernels (frequency)
1
I
1
1


43
Kernel size
5
5
3
5


44
Kernel shape
1
1
1
1


43
Kernel cross-section
2
2
2
2


46
Kernel shape of top
2
2
3
1


47
Kernel shape of base
3
3
3
3


48
Kernel lateral groove
1
1
1
1


49
Kernel fiber on skin
5
6
5
5


50
Kernel size of cavity
5
7
5
7


51
Nut ripening time
5
6
5
4


52
Nut adherence of husk
1
3
1
1



after drop






53
Nut percent kernel
4
5
4
6


54
Time of leaf fall
4
7
4
4



(November)









Microsatellite Marker Analysis: Twenty microsatellite (simple sequence repeat) markers were used. PCR products were multiplexed post-PCR and sized using capillary electrophoresis (Table 6, and see for example Bassil et al., Acta Horticulturae 686:105-110, 2005; Gökirmak et al., Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56:147-172, 2009; Gürcan and Mehlenbacher. Molecular Breeding 26:551-559, 2010; Gürcan et al.. Tree Genetics and Genomes 6:513-531, 2010).









TABLE 7







Primers and annealing temperatures for the microsatellite marker loci used for 


fingerprinting hazelnut cultivars.

























Primers 
















(5'-3') 













Lo-
Repeat
Allele
(SEQ ID 
(SEQ ID
Tm






Lo-
Refer-


Set
cus
Motif
sizes
NO:)
 NO:)
(° C.)
n
He
Ho
PIC
r
LG
cus
ence
























3
A613
(TC)132
149-
Ned-
R-
60
14
0.86
0.85
0.85
0.00
11R
A613
Gurcan 




(CA)1
177
CACACGCCT
CCCCTTTCA








et al., 






TGTCACTCT
CATGTTTGC 








2010






TT (1)
TT( 2)











2
A614
(TC)17
125-
Hex-
R-
60
14
0.85
0.85
0.84
0.00
6S,
A614
Gurcan 




(CA)10
156
TGGCAGAGC
GCAGTGGAG






6R

et al., 




NNN(CA)6

TTTGTCAGC
GATTGCTGA








2010






TT (3)
CT (4)











3
A616
(AC)11
136-
Fam-
R-
60
13
0.85
0.85
0.83
0.00
8R
A616
Gurcan 





162
CACTCATAC
ATGGCTTTT








et al., 






CGCAAACTC
GCTTCGTTT 








2010






CA (5)
TG (6)











1
A640
(CT)153
354-
F-
Fam-
67
11
0.80
0.73
0.77
0.04
10R
A640
Gurcan 




(CA)1
378
TGCCTCTGC
CGCCATATA








et al., 






AGTTAGTCA
ATTGGGATG








2010






TCAAATGTA
CTTGTTG 















GG (7)
(8)











3
B617
(GA)15
280-
Fam-
R-
60
9
0.80
0.78
0.78
0.01
8S,
B617
Gurcan 





298
TCCGTGTTG
TGTTTTTGG






8R

et al., 






AGTATGGAC
TGGAGCGAT 








2010






GA (9)
G (10)











2
B619
(TC)21
146-
Fam-
R-
60
14
0.88
0.88
0.87
0.00
3S,
B619
Gurcan 





180
AGTCGGCTC
GCGATCTGA






3R

et al., 






CCCTTTTCT
CCTCATTTT








2010






C(11)
TG (12)











4
B634
(AG)15
218-
Hex-
R-
60
9
0.76
0.76
0.73
0.00
4R
B634
Gurcan 





238
CCTGCATCC
GTGCAGAGG








et al., 






AGGACTCAT
TTGCACTCA








2010






TA (13)
AA (14)











4
B657
(AG)15
210-
Ned-
R-
60
8
0.84
0.98
0.82
−0.08
11S,
B657
Gurcan 





228
GAGAGTGCG
AGCCTCACC






11R

et al., 






TCTTCCTCT
TCCAACGAA 








2010






GG (15)
C (16)











3
B671
(AG)6NN
221-
Hex-
R-
60
13
0.86
0.88
0.84
−0.01
9S,
B671
Gurcan 




(GA)17
249
TTGCCAGTG
ACCAGCTCT






9R

et al., 






CATACTCTG
GGGCTTAAC








2010






ATG (17)
AC (18)











2
B709
(GA)21
219-
Ned-
R-
60
8
0.74
0.76
0.70
−0.01
5S,
B709
Gurcan 





233
CCAAGCACG
GCGGGTTCT






5R

et al., 






AATGAACTC
CGTTGTACA








2010






AA (19)
CT (20)











1
B733
(TC)15
161-
Ned-
R-
60
8
0.68
0.68
0.63
0.00
7S,
B733
Gurcan 





183
CACCCTCTT
CATCCCCTG






2R

et al., 






CACCACCTC
TTGGAGTTT








2010






AT (21)
TC (22)











2
B749
(TC)12
200-
Hex-
R-
60
6
0.60
0.64
0.51
−0.03
1R
B749
Gurcan 





210
GGCTGACAA
TCGGCTAGG








et al., 






CACAGCAGA
TGTAGGGTT








2010






AA (23)
TT (24)











4
B751
(GA)15
141-
Fam-
R-
60
7
0.80
0.78
0.77
0.01
7S,
B751
Gurcan 





153
AGCTGGTTC
AAACTCAAA






2R

et al., 






TTCGACATT
TAAAACCCC








2010






CC (25)
TGCTC(26)











1
B774
(AG)15
195-
Ned-
R-
60
8
0.80
0.80
0.77
0.00
5S,
B774
Gurcan 





213
GTTTTGCGA
TGTGTGTGG






5R

et al., 






GCTCATTGT
TCTGTAGGC








2010






CA (27)
ACT (28)











3
C115
(TAA)5
167-
Fam-
R-
60
10
0.84
0.90
0.82
0.035
4S,
C115
Bassil




(GAA)12
225
CATTTTCCG
GTTTCCAGA






4R

et al.,






CAGATAATA
TCTGCCTCC








2005b;






CAGG (29)
ATATAAT 








Gokirmak







(30)








et al.,
















2009


3
KG807
(TAAA)AA
226-
F-
Fam-
54
4
0.67
0.78
0.60
−0.07
11
KG807
Gurcan




(TAAA)2A
248
AAGCAAGAA
CTTACAGAT








and




(TAAA)2

AGGGATGGT
AAATGGCTC








Mehlen-






(31)
AAA (32)








bacher,
















2010


1
KG809
(AGG)6
333-
F-
Hex-
55
5
0.66
0.64
0.60
0.01
4
KG809
Gurcan





345
GGAAGGTGA
AGGCATCAG








and






GAGAAATCA
TTCATCCAA 








Mehlen-






AGT (33)
(34)








bacher,
















2010


2
KG811
(GA)17
240-
F-
Ned-
58
12
0.83
0.82
0.81
0.01
2
KG811
Gurcan





278
GAACAACTG
AAGGCGGCA








and






AAGACAGCA
CTCGCTCAC 








Mehlen-






AAG (35)
(36)








bacher,
















2010


4
KG827
(CT)13AA
264-
Fam-
R-
67
9
0.78
0.84
0.75
−0.04
9
KG827
Gurcan




(CA)7
282
AGAACTCCG
GAGGGAGCA








and






ACTAATAAT
AGTCAAAGT








Mehlen-






CCTAACCCT
TGAGAAGAA 








bacher,






TGC (37)
A( 38)








2010


2
KG830
(CT)14
279-
Ned-
R-
67
9
0.79
0.78
0.76
0.00
9
KG830
Gurcan




GTATT
311
TGGAGGAAG
AAAGCAACT








and




(CA)8

TTTTGAATG
CATAGCTGA








Mehlen-






GTAGTAGAG
AGTCCAATC 








bacher,






GA (39)
(40)A








2010





Set = Multiplex set, with samples mixed after PCR but before submission for sizing by capillary electrophoresis;


Allele size = range of sizes;


Primers, forward (F, listed first) and reverse (R, second) (Hex and Fam are dyes);


Tm = Annealing temperature;


n = Number of alleles;


He = expected heterozygosity;


Ho = observed heterozygosity;


PIC = Polymorphism information content;


r = frequency of null alleles;


LG = linkage group (S is susceptible female parent ‘OSU 252.146’; R is resistant parent ‘OSU 414.062’);


Reference is the journal article where additional details were published.






Table 8 shows allele sizes at 20 microsatellite markers for ‘OSU 541.147’, its female parent ‘NY 616’, and 13 additional cultivars and selections. ‘Rush’, ‘Barcelona’, ‘Montebello’ and ‘Tombul Ghiaghli’ are in the pedigree of ‘OSU 541.147’. Cultivars ‘OSU 541.147’, ‘NY 110’, ‘NY 616’, ‘Rush’, ‘Barcelona’ , ‘Montebello’, and ‘Tombul Ghiaghli’ were fingerprinted in 2020. The other cultivars were fingerprinted in 2018 for ‘PollyO’ (U.S. Plant Patent Publication No. US-2020-0008334-P1). ‘OSU 541.147’ is easily distinguished from all others shown in Table 8. ‘OSU 541.147’ shares an allele with its mother ‘NY 616’ at all SSR loci.









TABLE 8





Allele sizes at 20 microsatellite markers






















‘OSU
‘NY


‘Monte-
‘Tombul


Marker
541.147’
616’
‘Rush’
‘Barcelona’
bello’
Ghiaghli’





A613
161/161
161/163
153/163
153/161
151/153
153/169


A614
124/150
124/132
124/133
124/132
124/132
132/150


A616
144/150
144/150
140/150
144/152
152/160
152/160


A640
356/374
356/356
356/356
354/374
362/374
354/374


B617
289/289
281/289
281/285
285/289
285/293
293/295


B619
158/170
158/172
158/168
158/172
160/166
166/170


B634
228/228
228/240
230/240
228/228
232/236
228/232


B657
222/222
214/222
214/214
218/222
218/226
210/214


B671
225/249
225/231
231/231
225/229
225/243
229/249


B709
229/235
229/235
229/229
227/235
229/235
223/229


B733
173/175
173/175
175/175
173/175
175/185
173/175


B749
216/216
208/216
206/208
216/216
216/216
216/216


B751
148/150
144/150
150/150
144/154
154/154
148/154


B774
205/217
205/213
205/205
209/213
209/213
201/217


C115
182/215
174/215
215/215
174/194
174/197
174/182


KG807
252/252
242/252
238/242
238/252
238/242
230/253


KG809
339/342
339/339
339/339
339/339
339/348
339/342


KG811
263/267
263/267
255/263
261/267
251/267
245/267


KG827
278/282
270/282
270/272
282/284
282/282
278/284


KG830
291/295
291/307
307/307
291/295
291/295
289/295















Marker
‘NY 110’
‘Daviana’
‘Mortarella’
‘Negret’
‘Casina’





A613
153/163
167/179
151/153
153/159
151/153


A614
124/132
148/150
132/135
132/132
124/139


A616
140/150
150/152
150/158
152/160
144/152


A640
356/374
354/354
354/374
354/368
354/372


B617
285/293
289/295
293/295
285/291
285/295


B619
168/168
168/178
158/172
166/170
150/158


B634
232/240
228/236
228/236
228/234
228/232


B657
214/218
218/226
218/224
218/222
216/218


B671
229/231
239/249
225/243
229/237
229/249


B709
229/229
229/229
221/229
223/227
227/233


B733
163/175
173/181
175/175
167/175
175/175


B749
208/216
216/216
214/216
216/216
214/216


B751
144/150
144/152
144/154
152/154
152/154


B774
205/209
213/215
209/220
209/215
209/215


C115
174/215
174/194
182/215
182/215
174/197


KG807
242/242
238/252
230/234
238/252
238/252


KG809
339/339
339/342
342/342
339/342
339/339


KG811
255/263
255/261
261/267
259/267
251/267


KG827
272/284
272/272
282/282
272/284
272/284


KG830
295/295
289/295
291/307
295/303
295/303




















‘Tonda


Marker
‘Polly0’
‘McDonald’
‘Wepster’
‘Yamhill’
Pacifica’





A613
153/167
153/169
159/167
153/163
159/169


A614
124/158
135/158
135/158
132/158
135/150


A616
144/152
150/160
152/160
150/150
150/160


A640
354/354
362/368
368/374
354/368
368/374


B617
285/295
293/295
293/295
289/295
293/295


B619
158/166
158/172
166/172
158/172
166/172


B634
228/236
222/228
228/228
236/236
228/228


B657
218/218
210/218
226/226
218/228
210/226


B671
229/249
229/237
239/249
225/243
229/239


B709
223/227
229/229
229/235
229/229
229/235


B733
175/181
173/175
173/175
181/185
173/175


B749
216/216
214/216
214/216
216/216
214/216


B751
144/154
144/144
144/144
152/152
144/154


B774
209/209
209/220
209/213
209/217
209/213


C115
194/215
174/197
182/194
197/215
174/182


KG807
238/252
252/252
252/252
230/252
228/252


KG809
342/342
339/339
342/342
348/348
339/342


KG811
261/267
245/267
257/257
251/261
245/257


KG827
272/284
272/284
270/282
282/282
270/284


KG830
291/295
291/295
295/305
291/295
291/295









REFERENCES



  • Bhattarai, G., S. A. Mehlenbacher, and D. C. Smith. 2017. Eastern filbert blight disease resistance from Corylus americana ‘Rush’ and selection ‘Yoder #5’ maps to linkage group 7. Tree Genet. Genomes 13:45. DOI 10.1007/s11295-017-1129-9

  • Capik, J. M. and T. J. Molnar. 2012. Assessment of host (Corylus sp.) resistance to eastern filbert blight in New Jersey. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 137:157-172.

  • Capik, J. M. and T. J. Molnar. 2014. Flowering phenology of eastern filbert blight-resistant accessions in New Jersey. HortTechnology 24:196-208.

  • Coyne, C. J., S. A. Mehlenbacher, and D. C. Smith. 1998. Sources of resistance to eastern filbert blight. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 124:253-257.

  • Manzo, P. and G. Tamponi. 1982. Monografia di cultivar di nocciuolo. Istituto Sperimentale per la Frutticoltura, Roma.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A. 2014. Geographic distribution of incompatibility alleles in cultivars and selections of European hazelnut. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 139:191-212.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., M. M. Thompson, and H. R. Cameron. 1991a. Occurrence and inheritance of resistance to eastern filbert blight in ‘Gasaway’ hazelnut. HortScience 26:410-411.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., R. N. Brown, E. R. Nouhra, T. Gökirmak, N. V. Bassil, and T. L. Kubisiak. 2006. A genetic linkage map for hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) based on RAPD and SSR markers. Genome 49:122-133.

  • Mehlenbacher S. A. and A. N. Miller. 1989. ‘Barcelona’ hazelnut. Fruit Var. J. 43:90-95.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., A. N. Azarenko, D. C. Smith, and R. McCluskey. 2007. ‘Santiam’ hazelnut. HortScience 42:715-717.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2008. ‘Sacajawea’ hazelnut. HortScience 43:255 257.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2009. ‘Yamhill’ hazelnut. HortScience 44:845-847.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2011a. ‘Jefferson’ hazelnut. HortScience 46:662-664.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, R. L. McCluskey and M. M. Thompson. 2011b. ‘Tonda Pacifica’ hazelnut. HortScience 46:505-508.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2013. ‘Dorris’ hazelnut. HortScience 48:796-799.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2014. ‘Wepster’ hazelnut. HortScience 49:346-349.

  • Mehlenbacher, S. A., D. C. Smith, and R. L. McCluskey. 2016. ‘McDonald’ hazelnut. HortScience 51:757-760.

  • Molnar, T. J., J. C. Goffreda, and C. R. Funk. 2010a. Survey of Corylus resistance to Anisogramma anomala from different geographic regions. HortScience 45:832-836.

  • Molnar, T. J., J. M. Capik, S. Zhao, and N. Zhang. 2010b. First report of eastern filbert blight on Corylus avellana ‘Gasaway’ and ‘VR20-11’ caused by Anisogramma anomala in New Jersey. Plant Dis. 10:1265.

  • Molnar, T. J., S. A. Mehlenbacher, P. Engel, and J. M. Capik. 2019. Multiple sources of eastern filbert blight resistance provide breeding utility in New Jersey. J. Amer. Pomological Soc. 73: 178-192.

  • Muehlbauer, M. F., J. Tobia, J. A. Honig, N. Zhang, B. I. Hillman, K. Morey Gold, and T. J. Molnar. 2019. Population differentiation within Anisogramma anomala in North America. Phytopathology 109:1074-1082. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-18-0209-R.

  • Slate, G. L. 1952. Filbert varieties. Annu. Rep. Northern Nut Growers Assoc. 43:53-62.


Claims
  • 1. A new and distinct variety of Corylus plant named ‘OSU 541.147’ as illustrated and described.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under 2016-51181-25412 awarded by USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, under 58-5358-4-025 awarded by USDA-Agricultural Research Service, and under 18-13-202 awarded by USDA-Agricultural Marketing Service. The government has certain rights in the invention.

Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Molnar et al. 2010. Survey of Corylus Resistance to Anisogramma anomala from different geographic locations. HortScience 45(5) 832-836. (Year: 2010).
Molnar, Thomas J., “Genetic Resistance to Eastern Filbert Blight in Hazelnut (Corylus),” Dissertation, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2006 (121 pages).