The invention relates to a device for connecting two points in an electric circuit, that comprises: [a] a first miniaturized relay, where the first miniaturized relay comprises: [a1] an intermediate hollow space that defines a first end and a second end, which is opposite the first end, [a.2] a conducting element housed inside the intermediate space and which is a loose part that can move between the first end and the second end of the intermediate space, [a.3] a first condenser plate and a second condenser plate arranged next to the first end, [a.4] a third condenser plate and a fourth condenser plate arranged next to the second end and opposite the first condenser plate and the second condenser plate, where the conducting element moves between the first end and the second end according to electrical signals applied to the condenser plates, [a.5] two contact points, where the conducting element is suitable for contacting with both contact points, joining them electrically, [b] a control circuit, where the control circuit acts upon the first miniaturized relay by applying to at least one of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the first miniaturized relay a first control signal and by applying to at least another of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plate of the first miniaturized relay a second control signal, where the second control signal is smaller than the first control signal.
Devices are known like those indicated above. In fact, usually, the device is made up of a single relay that performs the function of connecting and disconnecting two points in an external circuit. The above-mentioned relays are described, for example, in PCT application WO2004046019, published on 3 Jun. 2004, and in the name of the same applicant. These miniaturized relays are made using specific methods for making micromechanisms, known as MEMS (micro electro-mechanical systems), Microsystems y/o Micromachines. PCT application WO2004046019 describes in detail the operation of these relays and also describes multiple designs with various improvements. In particular, pages 3 and 4 describe the relay, its operation and the advantages thereof over other relays, page 6, line 16 to page 8 line 15 describes in detail a relay with 4 or more condenser plates, page 10 line 24-30 describes a relay that acts simultaneously on two external circuits in a complementary form (opening one when the other closes, and vice versa), page 19 line 7 to page 22 line 2 (together with FIGS. 1-3) details the operation, and page 22 line 4 to page 23 line 3 (together with FIGS. 4 and 5) details the geometry of a miniaturized relay (MEMS relay).
However, since these miniaturized relays have a conducting element responsible for opening and closing an external circuit that is a loose part and is moved thanks to electrostatic forces, they suffer from some drawbacks. For example, in certain working conditions, it cannot be guaranteed that the relay opens or closes the external electrical circuit.
Therefore there is the need to develop a new device for connecting two points in an electrical circuit which, comprising a miniaturized relay like the one indicated, has a more versatile operation.
Hereinafter, in this specification and claims, whenever reference is made to a relay, it will refer to a miniaturized relay like those indicated above (in other words, like those described in PCT application WO2004046019) unless expressly indicated otherwise. Both the analyzed problem and the proposed solutions are specific for this type of relays.
This object of this invention is a device for connecting two points in an electrical circuit of the type indicated at the beginning, characterized in that [1] it comprises, in addition, [c] a second miniaturized relay, where the second miniaturized relay comprises: [c1] an intermediate hollow space defining a first end and a second end, which is opposite the first end, [c.2] a conducting element housed inside the intermediate space and which is a loose part that can move between the first end and the second end of the intermediate space, [c.3] a first condenser plate and a second condenser plate arranged next to the first end, [c.4] a third condenser plate and a fourth condenser plate arranged next to the second end and opposite the first condenser plate and the second condenser plate, where the conducting element moves between the first end and the second end according to electrical signals applied to the condenser plates, [c.5] two contact points, where the conducting element is suitable for contacting with both contact points joining them electrically,
and in that
[2] either the second relay has one of its contact points connected to one of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the first miniaturized relay, whereby when the second miniaturized relay is open, the condenser plate of the first miniaturized relay that is electrically connected to one of the contact points of the second miniaturized relay remains in a state of high impedance;
[2′] or the second miniaturized relay has at least one of its contact points connected to one of the contact points of the first miniaturized relay, and [3′] the control circuit acts on the second miniaturized relay by applying to at least one of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the second miniaturized relay a third control signal and by applying to at least another of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the second relay a fourth control signal, where the fourth control signal is larger than the third control signal, whereby the second relay is activated with its polarity inverted with respect to the first miniaturized relay, where none of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of none of the first and second miniaturized relays remain in a state of high impedance;
[2″] or the second miniaturized relay has at least one of its contact points connected to one of the contact points of the first miniaturized relay, and [3″] the control circuit acts upon the second miniaturized relay by applying to at least one of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the second miniaturized relay a third control signal and by applying to at least another of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of the second relay a fourth control signal, where the fourth control signal is smaller than the third control signal, whereby the second relay is activated with the same polarity as the first relay, where at least one of the third and fourth control signals is different from the first control signal and the second control signal, where none of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates of none of the first and second miniaturized relays remains in a state of high impedance.
The third signal is equivalent to the first signal and the fourth signal is equivalent to the second signal, so that if the third signal is larger than the fourth signal the second relay has its polarity in the same direction as the first relay, whereas if the third signal is smaller than the fourth signal then the second relay is polarized in reverse direction with respect to the first relay. Below the concept of a relay with inverted polarity is explained.
The device according to the invention acts, from the point of view of the user, as if it was a single relay, in other words, it is a device that is used to open or close an external circuit. However, inside the device there are two or more relays whose function is not to open and close other external circuits but to extend the working range (the operational range) of the device.
Other advantages and characteristics of the invention are appreciated from the following description, in which, with a non-limiting character, describes preferred embodiments of the invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings. The figures show:
The applicant has analyzed the various working conditions of the above-mentioned miniaturized relays, and has analyzed in what conditions the opening or closing of the external electrical circuit can fail, and has reached the following conclusions:
The miniaturized relay according to the invention works thanks to the fact that between the condenser plates and the conducting element electrostatic forces are produced that can move the conducting element in the desired direction. However, when the conducting element is in contact with the external electrical circuit, the conducting element is subjected to a voltage that is obliged by the external electrical circuit. This voltage can be known, for example in the event that the external electrical circuit is at the unit's supply voltage, V0, or in the event that the external electrical circuit is directly connected to mass or ground. However, in other cases, the voltage Vs which the conducting element will have is a voltage that cannot always be known when designing the relay. But this voltage Vs affects the electrostatic force that the conducting element experiences, whereby the relay will only be able to open and close for certain Vs values, in other words, the relay will have a limited operational range. In order to be able to offer a device that can guarantee connection and disconnection within an operational range that is greater than the relay's operational range, suitable means must be included in the device to guarantee opening and closing the external electrical circuit according to a wider range of voltages than the voltage range of the loose relay.
Generally, a miniaturized relay like the ones used for the connection device according to the invention has a structure like the one reflected diagrammatically in
In the following formulae, the references Aa, Ab, Ac y Ad have been used to designate the corresponding areas of the condenser plates, and, similarly, Af represents the area of the mobile conducting element. The two contact points to the left are the ones that the conducting element will link electrically, and the two stoppers to the right are the ones preventing the conducting element from coming into contact with the condenser plates.
The electrostatic force Fe action upon the conducting element when this is moving without touching any contact point, is shown by the following equation:
where the values of the area coefficients CA2 and CA3 are shown by
CA1 is shown by
x0 is the distance between the condenser plates,
(1-α0-α0)x0 is the distance between the contact points and the stoppers, in other words, it is the distance that the conducting element can cover along the intermediate space,
x is the position of the conducting element, where the origin is on the condenser plates to the right, and the direction of the positive x values is to the left,
α0x0 is the distance between the contact points and the condenser plates to the left,
α1x0 is the distance between the stoppers and the condenser plates to the right,
A is the total area of the relay, which is approximately the area of the conducting element,
CAR is a coefficient between 0 and 1 that indicates the relationship between the total area of relay (A) and the total area of the condenser plates (max(Aa+Ac, Ab+Ad))
and the values A1, A2 and A3, are defined in Table 1, wherein Va, Vb, Vc and Vd are the voltages applied to condenser plates Aa, Ab, Ac and Ad, respectively, and Z indicates a high impedance state.
Using any of the combinations shown in Table 1, the conducting element will move in the direction of the negative x values, in other words, to the right in
In the same way, equivalent area coefficient values C′i can be defined.
In both Tables it has been indicated that the possible voltages to be applied are V0 (supply voltage, usually 5V) or 0V (ground or mass). However, it must be understood that, generally the same result is obtained using any two voltages, providing that the voltage substituting V0 is greater than the voltage substituting 0. To facilitate matters, hereinafter, “V0” should be interpreted as any voltage (the “control signal” mentioned above) and “0” should be interpreted as any other voltage smaller than the one above (the “second control signal” mentioned above), unless otherwise specified.
This way, both Tables 1 and 2 indicate the conditions in which the miniaturized relay must work so that it moves in both directions. Generally, there are two big groups of relay working conditions. On the one hand, one of the alternatives ones can be chosen in which one of the condenser plates must be in a state of high impedance (any of the lines 1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 in Tables 1 and 2). Hereinafter we will call them all alternative 1 as they will be analyzed together. On the other hand the alternative in line 3 in Tables 1 and 2 can be chosen, in which none of the condenser plates is in a state of high impedance, and which hereinafter we will call alternative 2.
So that the miniaturized relay (and, therefore, the connection device) can guarantee opening and closing the external circuit irrespective of the voltage to which the conducting element is subjected, the device must have suitable means (the “means suitable for guaranteeing the opening and closing of the external electrical circuit according to any voltage to which the conducting element is subjected” mentioned above), which guarantee certain working conditions, which are detailed below.
In the event that alternative 1 is chosen it is important to guarantee that the corresponding condenser plate is really in a state of high impedance. It must be taken into account that the condenser plates will really be in a particular physical environment, and they will be connected to their corresponding control circuits in a certain way. Using conventional solid state technologies, it is not possible for the condenser plate to be in a state of high impedance (infinite impedance), whereby it will have finite impedance. According to the invention, one way that the condenser plate can really be in a state of high impedance, is by controlling the condenser plate in question using a second miniaturized relay. This second miniaturized relay does not need to be able to work with the conducting element at any voltage, whereby its conducting element will only work at a certain, predetermined voltage (V0 or 0) since its function will be to connect the condenser plate of the first relay to V0 or 0. Therefore, it can be designed directly so that it guarantees the opening and closing of “its” external circuit. Therefore, the condenser plate of the first relay which is being controlled by the second relay will have its state of high impedance provoked by the second relay in open position, which means a very efficient high impedance value. At the end of this description obtaining a state of high impedance in the plates of the first relay is analyzed in greater detail.
In the event that alternative 2 is chosen, the following relationships must be fulfilled:
The analysis is detailed below considering that it is a SPST relay (Single Pole Single Throw, relay with a single conducting element (pole) and that it switches a single external circuit (throw)). A SPST relay is one that only has contact points of an external circuit at one end of the intermediate hollow space. Said SPST relay only acts upon a single external circuit. For their part, the SPDT relays (single pole double throw) have contact points on both sides of the intermediate hollow space (in other words, instead of the stoppers shown in
In the following explanations it is going to be considered that the contact points are to the left of the conducting element, whereby the conducting element has to move to the left (towards the positive X values) to come into contact and electrically link the contact points, and it will have to move to the right (towards the negative X values) to separate the contact points, thus leaving the corresponding circuit open. However, logically, the conclusions drawn are independent of this geometrical consideration.
In order to guarantee that the miniaturized relay works correctly, it must be guaranteed that four different conditions are fulfilled:
In the last two cases, the conducting element will be subject to a voltage that will be determined by the external circuit corresponding to the two contact points. In order to guarantee these four conditions, for an infinite range of conducting element voltages, in other words VSε(−∞, +∞), the following must be fulfilled:
Where α0′ indicates the maximum distance that the free plate can separate from the electrical contact point still maintaining the contact and therefore the voltage of the external circuit, basically due to the plate bending, or curving if it is flexible, etc. Obviously the following will always be fulfilled:
α0′>α0
It can be proved that these equations cannot be satisfied together with the equations
shown above.
The problem focuses on the relay opening and closing conditions. The relay opening will be analyzed in greater detail below. The relay closing condition can be analyzed in an equivalent manner.
For the relay opening condition the following inequation must be satisfied:
This formula takes into account the fact that
F
e
=F
2
−F
1
−F
3
in other words, the total electrostatic force is the sum of the force produced by each area A1, A2 and A3, as defined in Table 1, and each one is expressed as follows:
It can be proved that when the conducting element is not in contact with the contact points of the external circuit, the equivalent electrical circuit is the one shown in
The following formula can be obtained for voltage VS:
The inequation
cited above, defines a parabolic function in which the voltage of the conducting element, Vs, is the independent variable, in other words, Fe(VS). By analyzing this function it can be seen that three situations can occur, which will depend on area coefficient values CAi and the value of α0.
C
A2
<C
A3(α0−1−1)−2
VSε(−∞,+∞)
The voltage range VS1 in case 1 includes voltage ranges VS2 and VS3 in cases 2 and 3, and the case 2 range includes the case 3 range, in other words
VS3⊂VS2⊂VS1
where
R
0
=C
A2(α0−1)2−CA3
It is not possible to design a miniaturized SPST relay that works with alternative 2, in other words without any condenser plate in a state of high impedance, having simultaneously both the relay opening condition and the relay closing condition controlled by case 1. Therefore, in the case of alternative 2, it is not possible to guarantee that the miniaturized relay can open and close for any voltage Vs to which the conducting element is subjected.
It is necessary to combine the other options. In particular there are only two possibilities of real interest: making the two conditions (relay opening and closing) correspond to case 2, or making one of the conditions corresponds to case 1 and the other one to case 3. We will call these two possibilities, possibility 1 and possibility 2, respectively. Although there are other possibilities (where one of the conditions corresponds to case 2 and the other one to case 3, or where the two conditions correspond to case 3), they do not appear to have any practical interest.
In possibility 1, the two conditions correspond to case 2, whereby one of the following two voltage range intervals is obtained.
This solution can only be useful in particular cases, owing to the limitations that must be imposed with respect to VS. In fact, the following must be fulfilled:
α0′=α0
which means a considerable practical limitation.
In possibility 2 one of the relay opening and closing conditions corresponds to case 1, which means that it is fulfilled for any VS, but the other condition must correspond to case 3. Therefore the relay will be able to work with a VS range that will be either smaller than
or larger than
as shown in
Since the relay must guarantee that both conditions (opening and closing of the external circuit) are fulfilled simultaneously, the ranges in
The solution proponed by this invention for solving the problem of alternative 2 is to combine two miniaturized relays, each one of them working under different conditions, so that each of them has a range of permissible voltages VS at least partially different. This allows the creation of a device that includes the combination of both miniaturized relays and has a range of permissible voltages VS that is the combination of the voltage ranges of each relay. As it can be seen below, the two miniaturized relays could be combined by joining them serially or in parallel, depending on the desired result (really, depending on whether the relay in working in case 1 1 for the “open relay” condition or for the “close relay” condition). As will be mentioned below, the concept can be extended to more relays (serially connecting a plurality of relays, one plurality of relays in parallel and even one plurality of relays serially and in parallel) so that the device has a range that is the combination of all the relay ranges.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is obtained when the second relay has at least one of its contact points connected to one of the contact points of the first relay (in other words, it is connected serially or in parallel to the first relay), and the control circuit acts upon the second relay by applying to at least one of the first, second, third and fourth condenser plates a third control signal and by applying to at least another of its first, second, third and fourth condenser plates a fourth control signal, where the fourth control signal is larger than the third control signal, whereby the second relay is activated with inverted polarity with respect to the first relay. None of the condenser plates of the relays remains in a state of high impedance.
The relay has a very clear polarity definition when it is not activated in high impedance. On one side the two condenser plates are connected to one and the same voltage, and on the other side they are connected to different voltages. This means that in the end the layout is equivalent to the one shown in
Another preferred embodiment of the invention is obtained when the second relay has at least one of its contact points connected to one of the contact points of the first relay, and the control circuit acts upon the second relay by applying to at least one of its first, second, third and fourth condenser plates a third control signal and by applying to at least another of its first, second, third and fourth condenser plates a fourth control signal, where the fourth control signal is smaller than the third control signal whereby the second relay is activated with the same polarity as the first relay, where at least one of the third and fourth control signals is different from the first and second control signal. None of the condenser plates of the relays remains in a state of high impedance. In this case, the second relay is made to work with other voltages, so that the operational range is different for both relays, although their polarity is not inverted.
Effectively, if miniaturized relays are used that guarantee the opening action for an infinite range of values VS and the closing action for a finite range of values VS, and if both relays are connected in parallel, the resulting device will have a range of operational values VS that will be the combination of both ranges. If on the other hand, the miniaturized relays guarantee the closing action for an infinite range of values VS and the opening action for a finite range of values VS, its serial connection allows a device to be obtained having a range of operational values VS that is the combination of both ranges. As stated above, this can be applied generally to combinations of a plurality of relays connected serially or in parallel. Generally, it can be said that the various ranges of values VS for each miniaturized relay are obtained by making each of the miniaturized relays work under different conditions, in other words, by modifying their “V0” and “0” values which, as stated above, do not only mean the supply and mass voltage but also “any voltage” and “any other voltage smaller than the preceding voltage”.
Preferably, in the case of alternative 2.1, the third control signal is equal to the second control signal and the fourth control signal is equal to the first control signal. Effectively, in this case there are two relays working in similar conditions but with inverted polarity. This solution allows the device to have a greater operational range than that of individual relays, although the range cannot include the average value between the first control signal and the third control signal. It is particularly advantageous that the second and third control signals are ground (0V) and that the first and fourth control signals are the supply voltage (V0), since these two signals are always directly available in any circuit.
Another advantageous option, also in the case of alternative 2.1, is available when the second control signal is an intermediate signal between the first control signal and the third control signal, and the fourth control signal is an intermediate signal (generally different from the second control signal) between the first control signal and the third control signal. This way, it is possible to obtain an operational range that includes any value between 0V and the supply voltage, particularly the average value between the first and third control signals. The second relay is inverted with respect to the first relay and both relays are supplied by different voltage sources. It is particularly advantageous that the second control signal and the fourth control signal are equal to one another and, preferably, that they are the average value between the first control signal and the fourth control signal. This way only one intermediate voltage source is needed, since it supplies the second and fourth control signal simultaneously. Specifically, it is advantageous that the first control signal is the supply voltage (V0), that the second and fourth control signals are equal to one another (and preferably are equal to V0/2) and that the third control signal is the ground (0V).
Generally, using a second relay having inverted polarity with respect to the first relay allows a device to be provided having a operational Vs range between ground (0V) and the supply voltage (V0) without any of the relays having to be activated with voltages lower than 0V or higher than V0.
Some particular cases are described in detail below.
As already seen, generally it is desirable to have a device with an operational range that is greater than the operational range of each one of the relays making up said device. It is particularly advantageous that the range of permissible VS includes from 0 to the value of the supply voltage (V0 interpreted in its literal sense).
As also seen above, it is not possible to design a relay having a voltage range including V0/2 by only using ground (0V) and V0 as control voltages (in other words the voltages are applied to the relay condenser plates). One way of solving this problem is to use a double voltage source. A first relay can be controlled with voltages V0 and V0/2 and a second relay with voltages V0/2 and ground. This way a device can be obtained having an operational range of 0V (ground) to V0, including in particular V0/2.
In this case, the voltage ranges VS1 and VS2 of the first and second relay are
where it can be proved that
and a design can be produced that fulfills
This way, the following is obtained
Vmin1<Vmin2<Vmax1<Vmax2
Therefore
VS=(Vmin1,Vmax2)
The values of the voltages applied are shown in Table 3. It can be seen that the second relay has its polarity inverted with respect to the first relay.
Therefore, this is a way of obtaining a device that can guarantee working correctly (in other words, opening and closing the external circuit) for a VS range that includes V0/2. Also, with an appropriate relay design, the operational range can be made to include from 0 (understood as ground) to V0 (understood as supply voltage).
The same strategy can be used as in the case above and apply it to the case in which two miniaturized relays are serially connected. In this case, the relays used would be designed to guarantee closing the external circuit under any VS voltage applied to the conducting element and which have a finite operational range for opening the external circuit. In other words it is a question of combining case 1 and case 3 mentioned above, but with reference to the circuit closing condition.
By serially connecting both relays, the device assembly will have a voltage range VS with which it will be able to guarantee opening the external circuit which range will be the combination of ranges VS1 and VS2 of the corresponding relays.
By using ground and V0 as control voltages, it will not be possible to obtain a range of voltages VS that includes V0/2. One way of solving this problem is again by swing a double voltage source. The first relay is controlled with V0 and V0/2 and the second relay is controlled with V0/2 and ground. This way a global operational range is obtained again that includes V0/2. The graphical representation in
and a design can be produced that fulfils
Therefore the following is obtained
Vmin1<Vmin2<Vmax1<Vmax2
and
VS=(Vmin1,Vmax2)
Table 4 shows the control voltages that must be applied to each condenser plate in order to open and close the device.
Another preferred embodiment of the invention is obtained when the device has at least a third miniaturized relay, where the third relay is serially connected to the second relay if the second relay is serially connected to the first relay, or the third relay is connected in parallel to the second relay if the second relay is connected in parallel to the first relay. Effectively, in the event that it is not possible to cover the whole range 0V-V0 with two relays (or it is not of interest, as it is easier to design relays with a smaller as opposed to a large range), then it is necessary to add more relays (all connected in the same way, in other words all serially connected or in parallel) so as to be able to cover the desired range. However, as stated above, often, when designing a relay, it is not always possible to know what the needed range will be. Therefore it may be of interest to have a device that has a plurality of relays which cover a particular range (preferably the whole range 0V-V0) so that the device user can activate more or fewer relays according to particular needs.
Another preferred embodiment of the invention is obtained when the device relays are SPDT relays, in other words, relays that act upon two external circuits simultaneously. As stated above, these relays have two pairs of electrical contacts, one on each side of the intermediate space, so that the relay opens one circuit when closing the other and vice versa. This way a device can be obtained that can also act upon two external electrical circuits simultaneously, opening one when closing the other. To do this, however, the following has to be taken into account: if the relays are working according to case 1 to open the first circuit (and, therefore, must be connected in parallel), then they will be working according to case 1 to close the second circuit, since when the first is opened the second one closes. Consequently, if they must be connected in parallel for one circuit, they must be serially connected for the other circuit. An example of this device is shown in
Generally, in the layouts in the Figures, in which the relay has been illustrated as a rectangle, the external circuit connections have been shown in thick dotted lines, and the supply or control connections have been illustrated with a fine dotted line. Also, the two ends of one and the same external circuit are always drawn on opposite sides of the rectangle representing the relay.
As stated above, a preferred embodiment of the invention is obtained when the state of high impedance of certain condenser plates of the first miniaturized relay is guaranteed. To do this each of the condenser plates in question has been connected to a second relay (so that there are as many second relays as there are condenser plates for the first relay (for example, 4)), which will be responsible for connecting the plate to a previously determined voltage (V0 or 0). Then the effectiveness of this embodiment will be proved. This analysis will be divided into two different cases: when conducting element Af of the first relay is closing the external circuit of the first relay and, therefore, is subjected to a voltage Vf obliged by the external circuit of the first relay, or when the conducting element of the first relay is moving freely along the space inside the first relay, in which case its voltage Vf is determined by the voltage of the four condenser plates of the first relay. In order to simplify the nomenclature, it will be considered that the first relay has 4 condenser plates (A1, A2, A3, and A4) with four capacities (C1, C2, C3, and C4) and that the condenser plate that has to obtain the state of high impedance is plate A2. Logically these results can be applied generally to any condenser plate.
Plate A2 is controlled by a control circuit, or voltage source, that is suitable for supplying voltage VD to the plate. The voltage source has an output impedance ZD. The external circuit of the first relay is represented as a voltage source having value VS and impedance ZS on one side of the conducting element and impedance ZE to ground on the other side. CT is the capacity of the connection track.
ZS<<ZCi
Taking into account this condition, the simplified electrical circuit corresponds to the one shown in
The high impedance condition means that there is practically no voltage drop in C2, in other words that V2 is virtually 0. This has to be reached irrespective of the values ZS and VS. In particular this has to be satisfied when ZS=0. However, given that V2 is the voltage in terminals with one capacity, said voltage has infinite impedance and, therefore, the voltage divider made with C2 and ZD∥CT will make all the voltage drop via C2, unless impedance ZD is made with a capacitive component CD. Therefore this is a necessary requirement for being able to reach a state of high impedance. In this case the circuit is simplified even further, and corresponds to the one shown in
In the circuit in
since VS cannot be controlled, the following sufficient condition must be obliged
C
D
<<C
2
+C
T
C
D
+C
T
<<C
2
the first inequation is equivalent to
C
2
>>C
D
+C
T−2CT
which is satisfied in any event if the second inequation is fulfilled. Therefore the second inequation is a sufficient condition for both, and can be expressed in the following way:
C
2
>>C
D
+C
T
If ZS is different from 0, this is a sufficient condition. And since the value VS cannot be controlled, this condition is also necessary. In other words the condition that must be fulfilled to reach a state of high impedance is that the output capacity of the voltage source plus the capacity of the track has to be less than the capacity of plate A2.
In the event that the external circuit is open, there is no external voltage VS connected to the conducting element of the first relay. In this case the corresponding electrical layout is the one shown in
It is observed that the sufficient condition
C
2
>>C
D
+C
T
Indicated above is also a sufficient condition for the circuit in
In sections a) and b) above the spray currents from the condensers owing to their parallel parasitic resistances have not been taken into account. These resistances go from one end of each condenser to ground (in other words the substrate of the integrated circuit in which the device is located). These resistances have very high values, and therefore usually they can be rejected, but since the device is operating with pure capacitive impedances, these resistances must be taken into account. Generally, in short periods of time the capacitive impedances will dominate, but in longer periods of time (depending on the corresponding time constant) these parallel resistances will become dominant, as they are in parallel with infinite impedances. In the particular case of the device according to the invention, the fact should not be ignored that the first relay may be required to remain in a particular state (open or closed) during a long, a priori determined, period of time. Therefore it is advisable to guarantee that the device can operate under these conditions.
R
2
<<R
D
∥R
T
or, equivalently
R2<<RD
R2<<RT
In other words, R2 has to be much smaller than RD and RT.
It is important to take into account that the substrate resistance R1 will only exist when the conducting element is touching some of the fixed parts of the device, since while the conducting element is in the air (supposing that it does not reach the air breakdown voltage) there is no leakage current. In other words, when the conducting element is moving, R2 is infinite. In this condition the following are not fulfilled
R2<<RD
R2<<RT
Therefore it must be guaranteed that during the switching time ts condensers CD and CT dominate over their corresponding substrate resistances RD and RT, in other words,
RDCD>>ts
RTCT>>ts
Therefore, in order to satisfy these conditions and, at the same time conditions
R2<<RD
R2<<RT
very high values are needed for RD and RT.
One way of ensuring that this relationship is obtained
C
2
>>C
D
+C
T
is as follows. The second relay has two contact points that, really, will be surfaces on which the conducting element will be supported for closing the external circuit (which is the circuit controlling the voltage that is applied to the condenser plate of the first relay which it is desirable to be able to leave in a state of high impedance, that is, plate A2). Since it must be fulfilled that the output capacity of the voltage source (that is, of the second relay in open state) plus the capacity of the connection track has to be less than the capacity of plate A2, and taking into account that usually the first relay and the second relay will be in one and the same chip and have been manufactured using the same technology and have similar thicknesses, it must be fulfilled that area AS of the contact points of the second relay (of all of them) must be less than A2 of the condenser plate of the first relay which we want to be able to leave in a state of high impedance.
AS<<Ai
Usually the contact points will be a minimum size, whereby this condition could easily be satisfied.
e) Optimized Design of a Device Having a First Relay with Four Condenser Plates and Two Second Relays
Generally, a second relay is needed for each condenser plate in the first relay that we want to put in a state of high impedance. In other words, if we suppose that the first relay has four condenser plates (although it could have more plates) then four second relays are needed. This means increasing the integrated circuit area needed for the complete device. Below it is shown how, in certain cases, a first relay can be controlled with four condenser plates using just two second relays.
For example, if we suppose that a first relay has four condenser plates and a symmetrical design having CA2=0 y CA3=1, then the conditions that must be imposed on the condenser plates so as to be able to activate the relay are shown in Table 5
This combination of voltages can be supplied to the condenser plates of the first relay using just two second relays, if the two second relays are of the SPDT type, in other words, relays that act on two external circuits simultaneously, as stated above. The first of the second SPDT relays has its first external circuit connected to condenser plate A1 (in other words the one at voltage V1) and its second external circuit connected to condenser plate A2 (in other words the one at voltage V2). At the opposite end both circuits are connected to V0. This way, when the first of the second SPDT relays closes the external circuit corresponding to A1, V1 is V0 and the external circuit corresponding to A2 remains open, whereby it remains in a state of high impedance. Similarly the second of the second SPDT relays, has its first external circuit connected to condenser plate A3 (in other words the one at voltage V3) and its second external circuit connected to condenser plate A4 (in other words the one at voltage V4). At the opposite end both external circuits are connected to ground (GND). When the second of the second SPDT relays closes the external circuit corresponding to A3, V3 is GND and A4 remains in a state of high impedance, and when the external circuit corresponding to A4, V4 is GND and A3 remains in a state of high impedance.
For its part, the firing voltages of these two second SPDT relays are shown in Table 6.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200502916 | Nov 2005 | ES | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/011234 | 11/23/2006 | WO | 00 | 5/23/2008 |