This invention relates to diverters of flowing fluid and more particularly, although not exclusively, to rigid assemblies configured to entrain ambient fluid into a fluid jet and to divert fluid without need for flexible components or attachments.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0011521 of Collins discloses an example of a deflector of water exiting a sweep tail hose of an automatic swimming pool cleaner. The deflector is “a relatively flexible structure in comparison with the sweep tail hose,” see Collins, p. 1, ¶ 0008, and includes a mounting collar and multiple “elongated and highly flexible fingers projecting in a downstream direction.” See id., p. 3, ¶ 0029 (numerals omitted). As noted in the Collins application:
Described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,906 to Cooper is another deflector likewise designed to exploit principles of gravity. Detailed as being a “hole filled cover,” see Cooper, Abstract, 1.3, the flexible device of the Cooper patent moves, under force of gravity, to intercept a flowing water stream when a sweep tail hose exits a pool. Preferred devices are tubular bags of flexible woven metal material that supposedly allow water to pass through unaffected when the sweep tail is underwater. See id., col. 4, 11.31-45.
Water exits sweep tail hoses of at least some automatic swimming pool cleaners under significant pressure. Indeed, such pressure often may be sufficient to separate the flexible fingers of the deflector of the Collins application when the hoses break the surfaces of pool water. If this separation occurs, no deflection of flow will occur thereafter, and the stream of exiting water will continue unabated. Additionally, the tubular bags of the Cooper patent likely produce back pressure when the sweep tail hoses are underwater, reducing the effectiveness of the hoses and the associated cleaners. Accordingly, need exists for deflectors that function satisfactorily when sweep tail hoses are both underneath and above pool water surfaces.
The present invention provides such deflectors as alternatives to those of the Collins application and the Cooper patent. The deflectors do not operate principally based on gravitational forces. Consequently, they need not necessarily employ flexible components or attachments such as the fingers of the Collins application or the hole-filled bags of the Cooper patent.
Instead, rigid deflectors of the present invention continually position a fixed obstacle in a central portion of a fluid stream. Perforations in a rigid wall, moreover, draw fluid into the deflectors, creating a greater volume of exiting stream when an associated pool cleaner is underwater. This greater volume substantially offsets the power lost by the underwater stream contacting the fixed obstacle, avoiding much of the underwater performance degradation otherwise occurring through addition of a deflector. Hence, pool cleaners and their sweep tail hoses continue to operate well underwater notwithstanding attachment of deflectors of the present invention.
It thus is an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide deflectors of flowing fluid.
It is another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide fluid flow deflectors for use with sweep tail hoses of automatic swimming pool cleaners.
It is also an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide fluid flow deflectors omitting functional flexible components or attachments.
It is a further optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide fluid flow deflectors not predominantly dependent on gravitational forces to divert flowing fluid.
It is, moreover, an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide rigid deflectors with centrally-positioned, fixed obstacles at which flowing fluid is directed.
It is an additional optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide fluid flow deflectors entraining ambient pool water into an exiting stream when the deflectors are underwater.
Other objects, features, and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in appropriate fields with reference to the remaining text and the drawings of this application.
Illustrated in
Optimal underwater performance of sweep tail hose 18 occurs when the pressurized water travels through it generally unobstructed. Hence, any fluid obstruction attached to exit 30 of sweep tail hose 18 will degrade performance of the hose 18 underwater. Conversely, any obstruction attached to exit 30 conceivably could “improve” performance of sweep tail hose 18 above the waterline, at least in the sense of inhibiting water jetted from the hose 18 from spraying over any significant distance or area of a surrounding pool deck region, as noted in the Collins application.
Deflector assembly 34 (
The illustrated version of deflector 38 shows it as generally cylindrical in shape, albeit with differing cross-sectional diameters along portions of its length. This represents a presently-preferred configuration of deflector 38, although other shapes may be permissible. Likewise, although as illustrated deflector 38 is molded of plastic material as an integral unit, it may be constructed or assembled differently than shown or formed of different material.
Defined by deflector 38 may be first, second, and third sections 46A-C, respectively. First section 46A preferably is a fitting allowing attachment of deflector 38 to exit 30. To facilitate attachment, first section 46A may comprise multiple circumferential flanges 50, four of which are shown in
Second section 46B forms an entrainment region of deflector 38. It comprises generally cylindrical wall 58 of diameter D1 in which one or more openings 62 is present. Nine such openings 62 (arranged in three sets of three rows) are illustrated in
Whereas pressurized fluid from exit 30 enters deflector 38 through first section 46A (and flows from left to right in
Third section 46C may comprise generally cylindrical wall 70 of diameter D2. Diameter D2 preferably is less than diameter D1, as no further fluid entrainment is necessarily needed. Instead, openings 74 of wall 70, together with exit end 78, function principally as exits for fluid travelling within deflector 58. Although openings 74—like openings 62—are depicted as sets of elongated ovals, other shapes, sets, and arrangements may be employed instead.
Diametrically centrally located in third section 46C adjacent end 78 is obstruction 82. Obstruction 82 preferably is fixed in this position as, for example, by rigid beams 86 molded with or otherwise connected to wall 70. As shown especially in
Some fluid travelling through third section 46C will exit deflector 38 via end 78. Other fluid travelling through third section 46C is directed toward and thus will encounter contact surface 90 of obstruction 82. Such contact deflects fluid (radially outward) toward openings 74, with the deflected fluid interacting with other flowing fluid as it moves laterally toward and out of openings 74. Thus resulting is, generally, a laterally-oriented spray of fluid out of openings 74 and a longitudinally-oriented stream of fluid out of end 78.
When deflector 38 is underwater, water spray from openings 74 and concurrent diminution of velocity of the stream exiting end 78 tend to diminish the sweeping action of sweep tail hose 18, hence tending to degrade its performance. However, the entrained water entering via openings 62 creates a larger volume of flowing water than otherwise would be present, helping to offset the power lost by the underwater stream contacting obstruction 82.
When deflector 38 is above water, diminishment of the stream velocity exiting end 78 is beneficial, as it reduces the distance the stream may travel over the surrounding pool deck. Combined with the fact that much of the spray out of openings 74 is likely to return to the pool, the stream diminishment decreases both the quantity and forcefulness with which water will exit a pool. Accordingly, deflector 38 solves the problems identified in the Collins application and Cooper patent while maintaining useful functioning of sweep tail hose 18 underwater.
Such is true as well for alternate deflector 138 of the present invention. Deflector 138 may be similar to deflector 38 in many respects and comprise, for example, first, second, and third sections 146A-C, respectively. First section 146A, like corresponding first section 46A, preferably is a fitting permitting deflector 138 to be attached to exit 30. It thus may, if desired, include circumferential flanges 150 terminating in ramps 154 to facilitate snap-fitting deflector 138 onto exit 30.
Entrainment of ambient fluid likewise may occur via second section 146B. This second section 146B may comprise generally cylindrical wall 158 in which openings 162 are present. Unlike the nine openings 62 depicted in
Third section 146C may comprise generally cylindrical wall 170, preferably (although not necessarily) of diameter less than the diameter of wall 158. Openings 174 may be similar to openings 74 of deflector 38, and end 178 and obstacle 182 may be similar to respective end 78 and obstacle 82. Wall 170 may, however, optionally include additional structure to reduce the possibility of any attached scrubber 42 being detached from deflector 138 in use. The structure may include “grippers” in the forms of either or both of laterally-oriented, circumferentially-spaced protrusions 194 and longitudinally-oriented, circumferentially-spaced ribs 198. In addition to inhibiting rotation of scrubber 42 about wall 170, ribs 198 also may function to strength the wall 170. Other gripping and strengthening means may be included as well if desired.
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Additionally, the terms “pool” and “pools” as referenced herein need not be limited to swimming pools, but rather may include spas, hot tubs, and other bodies of water or fluid. Finally, contents of the Collins application and Cooper patent are incorporated herein in their entireties by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2515600 | Hayes | Jul 1950 | A |
2569683 | Lindsay | Oct 1951 | A |
2766026 | Boyd | Oct 1956 | A |
3776464 | Proffit | Dec 1973 | A |
4356582 | Stephenson | Nov 1982 | A |
4834423 | Deland | May 1989 | A |
5238585 | Reed, Sr. | Aug 1993 | A |
5931510 | Mathew et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5992451 | Chang | Nov 1999 | A |
5996906 | Cooper | Dec 1999 | A |
6199916 | Klinger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7478840 | Youssefifar | Jan 2009 | B2 |
D602128 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D615165 | Mcalpine et al. | May 2010 | S |
D639398 | Wilhelm | Jun 2011 | S |
D642244 | Wilhelm | Jul 2011 | S |
D654988 | Bloink et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
D654989 | Bloink et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
D657027 | Bloink et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
20080073911 | Wells et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100011521 | Collins | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2012 in related Application No. PCT/US2012/024040. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 17, 2013 in related Application No. PCT/US2012/024040. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120255579 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |