The present invention relates to burner apparatuses and methods used in process heaters, boilers, incinerators, and other fired heating systems.
A need exists for a fuel-flexible burner for refineries, chemical plants, and other facilities which will enable the operation of fired heaters using fuels ranging from conventional gases to bio-gases and synthetic gases. The burner will preferably be effective for safely and efficiently burning a broad range of gaseous fuels in a cost-effective manner while also minimizing emissions of pollutants. In addition, the burner will preferably provide a flame stabilization mechanism which will allow the burner and the fired heating system to quickly and safely adapt to sudden and wide swings in the heating value of the fuel delivered to the burner.
In a petroleum refinery, the composition of the refinery fuel gas generated by the refinery operations will vary considerably, and can change suddenly, depending upon the refinery configuration and upon the operating status and characteristics of the numerous processing units within the refinery. For example, Flexicoker off-gas is a low-BTU gas which is produced and used in many refineries and which can significantly reduce the heating value of the fuel delivered to the burner if used separately or in combination with other gases.
Heretofore, when the heating value or supply of the refinery fuel gas has been low, natural gas has typically been blended with the refinery-generated gases to supply the balance of the plant's energy requirements. Alternatively, natural gas can serve as a dedicated fuel for a unit or an entire plant.
Additional gaseous fuels of interest for use in fired-heaters include biogas from organic matter digesters, including animal and agricultural wastes, waste water plants, and landfills; as well as syngases from the gasification of biomass, municipal solid wastes, construction wastes, or refinery residuals such as tar, pitch and petroleum coke. Unfortunately, however, these gases typically have very low heating values and can vary significantly in composition.
The degree of interchangeability of gaseous fuels for use in combustion applications can be evaluated by determining and comparing the Wobbe numbers of the fuels in question. The Wobbe number of a gaseous fuel is determined by dividing the higher heating value of the fuel by the square root of its specific gravity. For incompressible flow through a fixed fuel orifice with constant fuel supply pressure, the energy flow rate (i.e., firing rate) of a gas fuel will be proportional to its Wobbe number.
Typically, the Wobbe number values for the different types of gas fuels mentioned above are as follows: from 120 to 150 for syngas; from 500 to 600 for biogas; from 1300 to 1400 for natural gas; and from 1100 to 1500 for refinery fuel gas. Consequently, in order to be able to use all of these various types of fuels interchangeably in one combustion system, the combustion system would be required to accommodate over an order of magnitude of variation in the Wobbe number value of the fuel delivered to the burner.
Heretofore, the burners available in the art have not been able to adequately and effectively respond and adapt to heating value and Wobbe number value changes approaching this magnitude. In fact, most commercial burners currently in service are not capable of handling low heating value fuels such as biogas and syngas at all. The stability mechanisms of the burners currently available in the market are typically designed for fuels that burn much more readily. Moreover, rapidly changing from one fuel to another stresses the stability of the burner even further.
Consequently, biogases, syngases, and other such low heating value gases are commonly viewed as being essentially unusable and as being so difficult to burn in a stabilized manner that they are simply flared off, thus wasting the energy content of these gases and leading to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions.
The present invention provides a fuel-flexible burner apparatus, and a method of burner operation, which satisfy the needs and alleviate the problems discussed above. The inventive burner and method allow the interchangeable use of fuels having Wobbe number values ranging from 1800 or more (e.g., high heating value conventional gas fuels) to 100 or less (e.g., low heating value bio-gases and synthetic gases). The unique flame stabilization features provided by the inventive burner and method also allow the burner to safely accommodate sudden and wide swings in the heating value of the fuel delivered to the burner, without exhibiting noticeable changes in the stability of the burner flame.
In addition, the inventive fuel-flexible burner and method generate very low levels of NOx and CO emissions. Further, by allowing the beneficial use of bio-gases, syngas, and other minimal heating value gases which have typically heretofore simply been disposed of by flaring, the inventive fuel-flexible burner and method operate to: reduce greenhouse gas emissions; reduce plant energy costs; reduce NOx emissions; and mitigate, to some degree, increases in the price of natural gas.
In one aspect, there is provided a burner apparatus for a fired heating system. The burner apparatus preferably comprises: (a) a longitudinally extending burner wall, the burner wall having a forward end, a longitudinally extending exterior, a longitudinally extending air passageway which extends through and is substantially surrounded by the burner wall, and a discharge opening of the air passageway at the forward end of the burner wall; (b) an exterior notch which is provided in and extends substantially around the longitudinally extending exterior of the burner wall, wherein the exterior notch is positioned rearwardly of the forward end of the burner wall; (c) a plurality of primary air delivery channels which are formed in the burner wall and extend to the exterior notch; (d) a plurality of primary combustion product gas discharge channels which extend in the burner wall from the exterior notch to the forward end of said burner wall; and (e) a plurality of fuel ejection structures positioned outside of the burner wall wherein the fuel ejection structures have fuel ejection ports and at least some of the fuel ejection ports are oriented for delivering at least a portion of the gas fuel into the exterior notch.
In another aspect, there is provided a method of operating a burner comprising the steps of: (a) ejecting a gas fuel from a plurality of ejection structures positioned outside of a longitudinally extending burner wall such that a first portion of the gas fuel is received in an exterior notch which is provided in and extends around a longitudinally extending exterior of the burner wall, the exterior notch being positioned rearwardly of a forward end of the burner wall; (b) delivering a first amount of air into the exterior notch and combusting at least some of the first portion of the gas fuel in the exterior notch to produce a primary combustion product gas; (c) delivering at least a portion of the primary combustion product gas to the forward end of the burner wall via a plurality of primary combustion product discharge channels which extend in the burner wall from the exterior notch to the forward end of the burner wall; and (d) combusting a second portion of the gas fuel forwardly of the exterior notch with air delivered through an air passageway which extends longitudinally through and is surrounded by the burner wall.
Further objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the accompanying drawings and upon reading the following Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments.
In the inventive burner apparatus and method of operation, an initial (primary) combustion and flame stabilization zone is created by combusting a portion of the burner fuel in an annular exterior notch which is formed in and around, or at least substantially around, the exterior of the burner tile wall. The annular exterior notch is positioned rearwardly of the forward end of the burner and is preferably configured and sized to receive less than 20%, more preferably from about 2% to about 15% and most preferably from about 5% to about 10%, of the total fuel and air combusted by the burner. The hot combustion products produced in this primary zone are channeled to the forward end of the burner wall where they mix with and provide an ignition source for the main fuel and air streams in a secondary combustion and stabilization zone, thereby further enhancing the ignition and stabilization of the main flame of the burner at or near the forward end of the burner wall.
By way of example, an embodiment 10 of the inventive burner apparatus is illustrated in
The outlet end 22 of burner 10 is in communication with the interior of the fired heater, boiler, incinerator, or other fired heating system enclosure in which combustion takes place and which therefore contains combustion product gases (i.e., flue gas). Burner 10 is shown as installed through a furnace floor or other wall 32, typically formed of metal. Insulating material 30 will typically be secured to the interior of furnace wall 32.
Combustion air or other oxygen-containing gas 28 is received in housing 12 and directed thereby into the inlet end 23 of burner throat 26. The air 28 exits the burner at the outlet end 22 thereof. As will be understood, the quantity of combustion air entering housing 12 can be regulated, for example, by a combustion air inlet damper. The air 28 can be provided to housing 12 as necessary by forced circulation, induced draft, balanced draft, natural draft, or in any other manner employed in the art.
A burner pilot 72 will preferably be located within the central passageway 26 of the burner wall 20 for initiating combustion at the outer end 22 of the burner. As will be understood by those in the art, the burner assembly 10 can also include one or a plurality of auxiliary pilots 75. Alternatively or in addition, the annular exterior notch 35 (described below) of the inventive burner 10 can be used as a pilot by feeding natural gas to the notch 35 via one or more of the air delivery channels 40 (described below) of the inventive burner 10 and providing a spark or hot surface igniter to light off a segment of the annular exterior notch 35.
The burner wall 20 of inventive burner 10 can be circular, square, rectangular, or generally any other desired geometry. The burner wall 20 will preferably have a circular or substantially circular cross-sectional shape.
The burner wall 20 of the inventive burner apparatus 10 preferably comprises: an annular exterior notch 35 as mentioned above which is provided in, and surrounds or at least substantially surrounds, the longitudinally extending exterior 38 of the burner wall 20; a plurality of primary air delivery channels 40 which are formed within and extend longitudinally through the burner wall 20 from the base end 23 of the burner wall 20 to the annular exterior notch 35; and a plurality of primary combustion product gas discharge channels 41 which are formed within and extend longitudinally through the burner wall 20 from the annular exterior notch 35 to the outer (forward) end 22 of the burner wall 20.
In the inventive burner apparatus 10, a portion of the gas fuel (preferably less than 20% of the total gas fuel) is combusted in and typically also to some degree outside of, the annular exterior notch 35 to provide an initial (primary) combustion and flame stabilization zone 14. The main combustion zone 46 of the inventive burner 10, however, is located forwardly of the annular exterior notch 35 and preferably begins at or close to the forward end 22 of the burner wall 20.
The burner wall 20 can be formed of either a single piece of refractory tile or a plurality of assembled pieces. The burner wall 20 is preferably formed of two pieces which comprise: (a) a longitudinally extending base tile piece 43 having a groove 44 formed around its distal end 45 and (b) a forward tile end piece 47 which is attached to the distal end 45 of the base tile piece 43 using mortar or any other suitable material or attachment means. The attachment of the tile end piece 47 to the distal end 45 of the base piece 43 closes the forward end of distal groove 44 of the base piece 43 so that the distal groove 44 of the base piece 43 forms the annular exterior notch 35 in the assembled burner wall structure. In addition, this two piece embodiment allows the primary combustion product gas discharge channels 41 to be conveniently formed in the tile end piece 47 prior to assembly, and also allows the primary air delivery channels to be separately formed prior to assembly in the base piece 43.
A series 15 of primary ejection tips, nozzles, or other primary fuel gas ejector structures 25 preferably at least substantially surrounds, and most preferably entirely surrounds, the burner wall 20. The primary fuel ejectors 25 are preferably positioned longitudinally rearward of and laterally outward from the annular exterior notch 35.
In embodiment 10 of the inventive burner, each primary ejector 25 is depicted as comprising a primary fuel ejection tip 36 secured over the end of a fuel pipe 37. Each fuel pipe 37 is in communication with a primary fuel supply manifold 34 and can, for example, either (a) extend through a lower outer skirt portion of the burner tile 20, (b) be affixed within the insulating material 30 attached to furnace wall 32, or (c) extend through an insulation filler material (e.g., a soft, high temperature insulating blanket material 78) installed between the lower end of the burner tile 20 and the furnace wall insulating material 30. While the fuel pipes 37 are preferably connected to a primary fuel supply manifold 34, it will be understood that any other type of fuel supply system can alternatively be used in the present invention.
The flow nozzles of at least some of the ejectors 25 of the primary series of ejectors 15 are oriented for discharging at least a portion of the gas fuel in a free jet flow regime toward and into the annular exterior notch 35. Preferably, a first set of the ejectors 25 in the primary series 15 are oriented to deliver a portion of the gas fuel into the annual exterior notch 35 and a second set (i.e., the remainder) of the primary ejectors 25 are oriented to deliver a portion of the gas fuel forwardly of the annular exterior notch 35.
More preferably, the first set of primary ejectors 25 are oriented to deliver a portion of the gas fuel toward the outer edge 48 of the rearward lateral wall 49 of the exterior notch 35 and the second set of primary ejectors are oriented to deliver a portion of the gas fuel toward the outer edge 51 of the forward end 22 of the burner wall 20. In this scenario, the rearward outer edge 48 of the exterior notch 35 and the forward outer edge 51 at the end 22 of the burner wall 20 operate as impact structures which decrease the flow momentum and/or increase the turbulence of the gas fuel streams sufficiently to promote flue gas entrainment and mixing while still allowing the respective streams to flow on to the primary (initial) and secondary (main) combustion zones 14 and 46. The hot, low-pressure areas created by contacting the refractory edges 48 and 51 further contribute to the enhanced combustion and flame stability provided by the inventive burner 10.
In one preferred arrangement, the first set of ejectors 25 in the primary series 15 (i.e., the primary ejectors which are directed toward the exterior notch 35) are arranged in an alternating relationship with the remaining second set of primary ejectors 25 such that (a) a first primary ejector 25 will eject gas fuel into the exterior notch 35, (b) the next succeeding primary ejector 25 will eject gas fuel forwardly of the exterior notch 35, (c) the next succeeding primary ejector 25 will eject gas fuel into the exterior notch 35, (d) etc. In other words, in this embodiment, every other tip 25 in the primary series 15 is oriented to eject gas fuel into the annular exterior notch 35.
Given that preferably less than 20% (more preferably about 2% to about 15% and most preferably about 5% to about 10%) of the total gas fuel used in the burner 10 is delivered to the annular exterior notch 35 of the burner 10, the flow orifices of the first set of ejectors 25 in the primary series 15 are sized to collectively deliver this amount of gas fuel to the notch 35 at a free jet velocity. The orifices of all of the other ejectors used in the inventive burner apparatus 10, on the other hand, are preferably sized to collectively deliver the remainder of the gas fuel to one or more locations beyond the annular exterior notch 35.
Consequently, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, if the primary series 15 of ejectors 25 is the only series of ejectors included in the inventive burner 10 and the primary ejectors 25 are arranged in an alternating relationship so that roughly half of the primary ejectors were oriented to eject gas fuel into the exterior notch 35, then the flow orifices of the other half of the primary ejectors 25 will be size to collectively discharge at least 80%, more preferably from about 85% to about 98% and most preferably from about 90% to about 95%, of the total gas fuel.
The number and size of the primary air delivery channels 40 extending longitudinally inside the burner wall 20 to the annular exterior notch 35 will preferably be sufficient to deliver the amount of combustion air needed to obtain a desired air/fuel combustion ratio in the primary combustion zone 14. This amount of air will typically be less than 20%, more preferably from about 2% to about 15% and most preferably from about 5% to about 10%, of the total combustion air used in the burner 10.
The primary air delivery channels 40 will preferably be arranged in a continuous series within the burner wall 20. In addition, the number of primary air delivery channels 40 will preferably be the same as the number of ejectors 25 in the primary series 15 of ejectors surrounding the burner wall. More preferably, a primary air delivery channel 40 will be positioned adjacent to each of the primary ejectors 25 surrounding the burner wall 20. Further, the diameter or width of the primary air delivery channels 40 will preferably be less than 50%, more preferably less than 33%, of the lateral width of the annular external notch 35.
Similar to the air delivery channels 40, the primary combustion product gas discharge channels 41 will also preferably be arranged in a continuous series within the outer portion of the burner wall 20. The combustion product discharge channels 41 will preferably be sized to allow the combustion product gases produced in the annular exterior notch 35 to flow through the combustion product discharge channels 41 to the outlet end 22 of the burner wall 20. In order to provide enhanced stabilization for the main flame of the burner 10, the cross-sectional shape, orientation, and location of the primary combustion product discharge channels 41 will preferably be selected to increase the size and strength of the recirculation zones established at the discharge openings 52 of the channels 41 at the outlet end 22 of the burner wall 20.
The primary combustion product discharge channels 41 are preferably rectangular, but could be circular other desired shapes. In addition, the discharge openings 52 of the primary combustion product discharge channels 41 preferably surround or substantially surround the outer discharge opening of the central air passageway 26 of the burner wall 20 and also preferably provide a total combined open length or arc length which is from about 30% to about 70%, more preferably from about 40% to about 60% and most preferably about 50% of the total distance around (e.g., the circumference of, in the case of a round burner) the outer end 22 of the burner wall 20.
Although other cross-sectional shapes can alternatively be used, the annular exterior notch 35 provided around the burner wall 20 preferably has a square or other rectangular longitudinal cross-sectional shape which is bound by three refractory surfaces, i.e., the rearward lateral internal wall 49 of the of the exterior notch 35, a forward lateral internal wall 53, and longitudinal interior wall 64. Except for the air delivery and combustion product discharge channels 40 and 41, the only open area of the annular exterior notch 35 is its longitudinally extending outer face 54 which receives radiation from the furnace chamber. Consequently, the net heat loss from the primary combustion zone 14 is very low, thus further increasing the stability of the primary combustion zone 14. In addition, a portion of the hot combustion gas product produced in the exterior notch 35 can exit the notch 35 via its open outer face 54 to provide a further ignition source for the forward outer edge 51 of the burner wall 20.
Further, the geometry of the annular exterior notch 35, the manner of delivery of the fuel stream through the open outer face 54 of the notch 35, the internal location of the discharge openings 55 of the primary air delivery channels 40, and the internal location of the inlet openings 56 of the primary combustion gas discharge channels 41 operate together to create and drive a toroidal circulation zone within the annular exterior notch 35. The resulting circulation and mixture of the fuel, air, and hot combustion products within the toroid serve to ignite the incoming fuel and to provide sufficient residence time for combustion to occur, thus further increasing the stability of the primary combustion and stabilization zone 14.
In regard to the internal cross-sectional geometry of the annular exterior notch 35, the internal discharge openings 55 of the primary air delivery channels 40 are preferably positioned such that the longitudinally extending center lines of the air delivery channels 40 are laterally outside of the longitudinally extending centerline 58 of the annular exterior combustion notch 35. This positioning allows the air stream to drive the toroidal circulation in the desired direction. In addition, to further drive the circulation and to prevent the primary air streams from passing straight through the annular combustion notch 35, the series of internal inlet openings 56 of the primary combustion product gas discharge channels 41 is preferably offset laterally inward from the series of internal air delivery openings 55. In addition, the longitudinally extending centerlines of the primary combustion gas discharge channels 41 are preferably positioned laterally inside of the longitudinally extending centerline 58 of the annular exterior notch 35. Also, to further promote strong circulation within the annular exterior notch 35, the notch 35 will preferably have a cross-sectional aspect ratio (longitudinal width/lateral depth) of from about 0.9 to about 1.5.
To provide further flexibility for burning low heating value fuel and for responding to sudden rapid swings in the Wobbe number value of the incoming fuel, the inventive burner 10 preferably also includes a series 15′ of secondary ejection tips, nozzles, or other fuel ejectors 25′ which preferably at least substantially surrounds, and more preferably entirely surrounds, and is spaced radially outward from, the series 15 of primary ejectors 25. The secondary fuel ejectors 25′ are preferably positioned longitudinally rearward of and laterally outward from the forward end 22 of the burner wall 20.
Each secondary ejector 25′ preferably comprises a secondary fuel ejection tip 36′ secured over the end of a fuel supply pipe which is connected to a secondary fuel supply manifold 34′. Although secondary fuel pipes for the secondary ejector tips 36′ are preferably connected to a secondary fuel supply manifold 34′, it will be understood that any other type of fuel supply system could alternatively be used for the secondary ejectors 25′.
The series 15′ of secondary ejection tips, nozzles, or other secondary fuel ejection structures 25′ will preferably be spaced radially outward from the series 15 of primary fuel gas ejection structures 25 by a distance of at least about 0.5 inches. Although greater spacings can be used for larger burners, it will typically be preferred that the series 15′ of secondary fuel ejectors 25′ be spaced radially outward from the series 15 of primary fuel ejectors 25 by a distance in the range of from about 1.5 to about 7.5 inches, most preferably from about 2 to about 4.5 inches.
The inventive burner 10 illustrated in
Each ejector 25″ preferably comprises a fuel ejection tip 36″ secured over the end of a fuel supply pipe which is connected to a third fuel supply manifold 34″. Although the fuel pipes for the ejector tips 36″ are preferably connected to a third fuel supply manifold 34″, it will be understood that any other type of fuel supply system could alternatively be used for the ejectors 25″.
Although three series 15, 15′, and 15″ of ejection tips, nozzles, or other fuel gas ejection structures are illustrated in
The incorporation of one, two or more additional series 15′, 15″ of gas fuel ejector tips in the inventive burner apparatus 10 increases the port area available for low Wobbe number fuels. In addition, the larger number of fuel jets increases the rate of mixing of flue gas with the fuel, yielding lower NOx emissions. Moreover, by sequentially opening additional outer fuel manifolds as the Wobbe number value of the gas fuel decreases, the gas header pressure can be maintained within a range needed for effective jet mixing characteristics. Thus, a wider range of fuels can be fired while achieving robust flame stabilization, good flame shape, and low NOx emissions.
In addition, as the Wobbe number decreases and each additional outer series of ejectors is activated, proportionally less fuel is fired from the primary injection manifold series 15. Consequently, the equivalence ratio of the gas and air mixture within the primary combustion zone 14 provided by the notch 35 becomes leaner with decreasing Wobbe number. In other words, while a rich, yet flammable mixture is desirably created in the annular exterior notch 35 when firing high Wobbe number fuels, the mixture desirable becomes leaner (i.e., has a lower fuel to air ratio) when firing low Wobbe number fuels. In addition, the burner's overall NOx emissions are minimized by burning only a small quantity of fuel in the notch region.
In the method of the present invention, the sequential activation or deactivation of additional outer fuel manifolds is preferably automatically controlled by (a) monitoring at least one parameter which is effective for indicating a reduction or increase in the Wobbe number value of the gas fuel and (b) activating or deactivating a secondary series of fuel ejection structures (e.g., a secondary ejector manifold) when the parameter reaches a predetermined value. Consequently, for example, if the inventive burner 10 were operating using only its primary series 15 of ejectors 25, the secondary series 15′ of ejectors 25′ would be automatically activated if the monitored parameter(s) reached a predetermined value indicating a sufficient decline in the Wobbe number value of the fuel. Subsequently, if the Wobbe number value of the fuel continued to decline such that the monitored parameter(s) again reached a predetermined value, the third series 15″ of ejectors 25″ would also be automatically activated.
By way of example, but not by way of limitation, the monitored parameter could include or consist of the fuel gas pressure of the inner ejector ring(s) such that an additional outer ring of ejectors might be automatically activated as the maximum available pressure for the inner ring(s) is reached. Alternatively, examples of other parameters which could be monitored and used for control purposes include, but are not limited to, the composition and/or Wobbe number of the fuel.
Each of the fuel gas ejector tips 36, 36′, and 36″ in the primary, secondary and third series of ejector tips can have any desired number of ejection ports provided therein. Such ports can also be of any desired shape and can be arranged to provide generally any desired pattern or regime of fuel gas flow outside of burner wall 20. Examples of suitable ejection port shapes include but are not limited to circles, ellipses, squares, rectangles, and supersonic-type ejection orifices.
Each of the ejector tips 36, 36′, and 36″ employed in burner 10 will most preferably have only a single ejection port provided therein. The individual ejection port provided in each ejector tip 36, 36′, and 36″ can be of any shape capable of providing the free jet flow and degree of entrainment and mixing desired. Additionally, the individual ejection orifices of all of the ejector tips 36, 36′, and 36″ can be of the same shape or can be of any desired combination of differing acceptable shapes. Typically, the ejection ports of tips 36, 36′, and 36″ will be, or will have a size equivalent to, a circular port having a diameter in the range of from about 0.062 to about 0.50 inches.
Depending primarily upon the size of the burner and the capacity requirements of the particular application in question, generally any number and spacing of the ejectors 25, 25′, and 25″ in the primary, secondary, or third series 15, 15′, or 15″ can be used. The spacing between adjacent pairs of ejectors will typically be the same, but can be different. Adjacent pairs of ejectors 25′, 25′, or 25′ will preferably be spaced a sufficient distance apart such that neighboring ejectors will not interfere with each other in regard to the free jet entrainment of flue gas in the ejected streams. Each adjacent pair of ejectors will typically be spaced at least 0.25 inches (more typically at least 1.5 inches) apart. Each pair of adjacent primary ejectors 25 will more preferably be spaced from about 1.5 inches to about 2.2 inches apart.
Each of the primary, secondary and tertiary fuel ejector tips 36, 36′ and 36″ used in the inventive burner 10 will preferably be of a type as shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,661. U.S. Pat. No. 6,626,661 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A particularly preferred ejector tip structure 36, 36′, 36″ is shown in
These tip configurations reduce plugging and coking generally associated with most burner stability problems. They also have less mass and less exposed area which reduces temperature gain and thus reduces coking. In addition, the probability of plugging is further reduced since there is preferably only one port drilled in the tip. Further, the aerodynamic shapes of these tips additionally enhances the mixing of inert gases with the fuel gas ejected from the tips. The “air foil” type shape increases the flow of inert products of combustion around the tip for greater mixing which in turn reduces NOx emissions.
Further, the preferred use of only one (1) port drilled on the tip contributes to the significantly enhanced turndown ratio provided by the inventive burner assembly 10. In addition, since these tips do not require ignition ports and therefore allow the use of smaller fuel ports, more tips can be evenly positioned around the burner tile, thus enabling the burner to more evenly mix the fuel gas and combustion air together, which allows the burner to operate with lower excess air.
The following example is meant to illustrate, but in no way limit, the claimed invention.
Tests were performed using an inventive burner assembly 10 as depict in
In simulations of the burner assembly 10 performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling, the burner performed successfully on fuels ranging from syngas having a Wobbe number of only 117 to natural gas having a Wobbe number of 1346.
In actual testing, the inventive burner assembly 10 was vertically-mounted in a single-pass furnace having dimensions of 7 feet long by 5 feet wide by 45 feet tall. The furnace had six single-pass, water-tubes running from the top to the bottom of the heater to remove heat. The tubes were covered with 1 inch-thick ceramic fiber insulation from the floor to six feet above the floor. The remaining portions of the tubes were left bare.
The burner assembly was successfully fired using each of the gas fuels identified in the following Table 1. The gaseous fuels had Wobbe number values ranging from 116.5 to 1339.5. Emission samples were extracted at the base of the furnace stack below the stack damper. The firebox temperature was measured with a velocity thermocouple located about 14 feet above the furnace floor. The floor temperature was measured through the furnace door with a velocity thermocouple located about 1.5 feet above the furnace floor. Furnace draft was measured at the floor of the furnace.
After sufficient testing had been performed to ensure and confirm proper performance on the above-identified range of fuels, the burner was moved to, and horizontally mounted in, a second furnace for further testing for bio-derived fuels. The second furnace was a single-pass cabin style furnace that was about 37 feet long by 12 feet tall by 6.8 feet wide (inside of the tubes to inside of the tubes). The furnace had two sets of tube banks along the walls of the furnace. The west set (closest to the burner) had nine horizontal, single-pass water tubes (four on the south side and five on the north side) running from about 2 to 25 feet from the burner end of the heater. The tubes were left bare to maximize heat transfer. The east bank consisted of 24 horizontal, single-pass water tubes (12 on each side) running from about 26 to 36 feet from the west end of the heater. These tubes were also left bare to maximize heat transfer.
Flue gas samples for emissions were extracted at the base of the furnace stack below the stack damper. Firebox temperature was measured with a velocity thermocouple located 16 feet from the burner. Stack temperature was measured at the base of the stack below the stack damper. Furnace draft was measured at the wall of the mounted burner.
Test results for the inventive burner assembly 10 operating on natural gas and on the simulated bio-derived fuel are provided in the following Table 2. The bio-fuel represented one of the more challenging compositions with respect to flame stabilization, since the primary reactive species was methane and the level of dilution with carbon dioxide was high.
For operation with natural gas, essentially all of the fuel was injected through the inner ring 15 of tips 25 of the burner assembly 10. Due to the lower Wobbe number of the bio-fuel, both the inner ring 15 and middle ring 15′ of tips were utilized. For each fuel, flames were established within the annual exterior notch 35. Hot products exiting the notch 35 supported stabilization of the main flame on the tile's outer end surface 22.
Air pollutant emission levels when operating with about 15 percent excess air were low for each fuel. The carbon monoxide concentrations were below 1 ppm. The NOx concentration for operation with natural gas was about 20 ppm. For the simulated bio-gas this level dropped to about 10 ppm.
The visible flame envelopes for these fuels were similar. At the design firing rate of 5 MMBTU/hr, the flame length was about 8.5 ft. and the diameter was about 3.5 ft.
These tests demonstrated that the inventive fuel-flexible burner is able to utilize fuels having more than an order-of-magnitude variation in Wobbe number while maintaining stable flames and generating very low levels of NOx and CO emissions. Rapid and wide changes in fuel heating value were accommodated without noticeable changes in flame stability.
Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. Moreover, the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the preferred embodiments and steps described herein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such changes and modifications are encompassed within this invention as defined by the claims. In addition, the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
It will also be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that, unless otherwise specified, the inventive features, structures, and steps discussed herein can be advantageously employed using any number of exterior fuel ejection nozzles, each having one or any other number of flow ejection ports provided therein. In addition, the inventive burner described herein can be oriented upwardly, downwardly, horizontally, or at generally any other desired operating angle.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-EE0000069 awarded by the United States Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1234088 | Ralston | Jul 1917 | A |
2174663 | Keller | Oct 1939 | A |
2643916 | White et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
2671507 | Morck | Mar 1954 | A |
2808876 | Loof | Oct 1957 | A |
2851093 | Zink et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2918117 | Griffin | Dec 1959 | A |
3000435 | Bloom et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3033273 | Zink, Jr. et al. | May 1962 | A |
3180395 | Reed | Apr 1965 | A |
3198436 | Kurzinski et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3217779 | Reed et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3639095 | Zink et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3644076 | Bagge | Feb 1972 | A |
3672655 | Carter | Jun 1972 | A |
3737105 | Arnold et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3771944 | Hovis et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3798948 | Fangmeier et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3876362 | Hirose | Apr 1975 | A |
3915621 | Iverson | Oct 1975 | A |
3924574 | Ebeling | Dec 1975 | A |
3929511 | Solomon | Dec 1975 | A |
3954382 | Hirose | May 1976 | A |
4004875 | Zink et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4009989 | Bitterlich | Mar 1977 | A |
4014654 | Howell | Mar 1977 | A |
4162140 | Reed | Jul 1979 | A |
4231735 | Downs | Nov 1980 | A |
4237858 | Goodnight et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4257762 | Zink et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4257763 | Reed | Mar 1981 | A |
4277942 | Egnell et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4289474 | Honda et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4395223 | Okigami et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4412808 | Sheppard et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4428727 | Deussner et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4451230 | Bocci et al. | May 1984 | A |
4476791 | Cegielski, Jr. | Oct 1984 | A |
4483832 | Schirmer | Nov 1984 | A |
4496306 | Okigami et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4505666 | Martin et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4575332 | Oppenberg et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4702691 | Ogden | Oct 1987 | A |
4708638 | Brazier et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4756684 | Nishikawa et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4945841 | Nakamachi et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5044932 | Martin et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5073105 | Martin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5098282 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5118284 | Mutchler | Jun 1992 | A |
5138860 | Del Fabro et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154596 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5180300 | Hovis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5195884 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5238395 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5269678 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271729 | Gensler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284438 | McGill et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5302113 | Eichelberger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5344307 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5441404 | Christenson | Aug 1995 | A |
5458481 | Surbey et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5542840 | Surbey et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545031 | Joshi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554022 | Nabors, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562437 | Gauthier | Oct 1996 | A |
5575637 | Slavejkov et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5611682 | Slavejkov et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632614 | Consadori et al. | May 1997 | A |
5676010 | College et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680823 | LaRose | Oct 1997 | A |
5688115 | Johnson | Nov 1997 | A |
5709541 | Gensler et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5797738 | Wills | Aug 1998 | A |
5816466 | Seufer | Oct 1998 | A |
5957678 | Endoh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5975886 | Philippe | Nov 1999 | A |
5980243 | Surbey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007325 | Loftus et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6045353 | VonDrasek et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067835 | Pollock | May 2000 | A |
6499990 | Zink et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6536950 | Green et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6626661 | Zink | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6672858 | Benson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6695609 | Chung et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6875008 | Martin et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7383973 | Enyedy | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7441682 | Kerekes et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7670135 | Zink | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7777977 | Chase et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7907272 | Zelepouga et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8138927 | Diepenbroek et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8274560 | Galfrascoli et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20010018171 | Al-Halbouni | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010034001 | Poe et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030148236 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040050131 | Militaru et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050239005 | Lugnet et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266363 | Ganeshan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070266634 | Tsangaris et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070289216 | Tsangaris et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080096146 | Li | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080199554 | Manda et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080233523 | Diepenbroek et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20130122440 | Zink et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
600 16 106 | Dec 2005 | DE |
0967440 | Dec 1999 | EP |
2001030077 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001205335 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2003266149 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2008110359 | May 2008 | JP |
WO 9004740 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9850191 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO2014127306 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report; European Patent Office; Jul. 6, 2015; Europe. |
Boston Gear, “Printout re 700 Series Single Reduction Flanged Reducer Dimensions”, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in : US. |
Unknown, Advanced Rupture Disk Technology, Inc. “Gas Pilots”, Apr. 20, 2010, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in: US. |
Bellovich, et al., “Flare Pilot System Safety”, Mar. 2007, pp. 1014, vol. 26, No. 1, Publisher: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2006 Spring National Meeting, Orlando, FL, Published in: US. |
John Zink.com, “Pilot Monitoring Systems”, Apr. 20, 2010, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in: US. |
John Zink.com, “Retractable Systems”, Apr. 20, 2010, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in: US. |
John Zink.com, “Retractable Therocouples”, Apr. 20, 2010, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in: US. |
Zeeco, Inc., “Auxiliary Equipment Pilot Monitors”, Apr. 20, 2010, Publisher: Internet Printout, Published in: US. |
Jamaluddin, et al, “Development and Testing of a Fuel-Flexible Burner for Fired Heaters”; Published in: US. |
Jamaluddin, et al., “Development of a Fuel-Flexible Burner for Process Plants”; American Flame Research Committee Annual Meeting; Salt Lake City, Utah; Sep. 5-7, 2012. |
Vandermeer, Willy; “Flame Safeguard Controls in Multi-Burner Environments”; Apr. 1998; Published in: US. |
Borg, Stephen et al; “A Fiber-Optic Probe Design for Combustion Chamber Flame Detection Applications”; NASA/TM-2001-211233; Oct. 2001; Published in: US. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,004; “Apparatus and Method for Monitoring Flares and Flare Pilots”; First Named Inventor: Cody L. Little; filed Mar. 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/935,152; “Apparatus for Installing a Retractable Thermocouple”; First Named Inventor: Clayton A. Francis; filed Jul. 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/229,820; “Non-Symmetrical Low NOx Burner Apparatus and Method”; First Named Inventor: Darton J. Zink; filed Jun. 9, 2014. |