This disclosure generally relates to a gas turbine engine, and more particularly to rotor blades that improve gas turbine engine performance.
Gas turbine engines, such as turbofan gas turbine engines, typically include a fan section, a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section. During operation, air is pressurized in the compressor section and mixed with fuel in the combustor section for generating hot combustion gases. The hot combustion gases flow through the turbine section which extracts energy from the hot combustion gases to power the compressor section and drive the fan section.
Many gas turbine engines include axial-flow type compressor sections in which the flow of compressed air is parallel to the engine centerline axis. Axial-flow compressors utilize multiple stages to obtain the pressure levels needed to achieve desired thermodynamic cycle goals. A typical compressor stage consists of a row of moving airfoils (called rotor blades) and a row of stationary airfoils (called stator vanes). The flow path of the axial-flow compressor section decreases in cross-sectional area in the direction of flow to reduce the volume of air as compression progresses through the compressor section. That is, each subsequent stage of the axial flow compressor decreases in size to maximize the performance of the compressor section.
One design feature of an axial-flow compressor section that may affect compressor performance is tip clearance flow. A small gap extends between the tip of each rotor blade and a surrounding shroud in each compressor stage. Tip clearance flow is defined as the amount of airflow that escapes between the tip of the rotor blade and the adjacent shroud. Tip clearance flow reduces the ability of the compressor section to sustain pressure rise and may have a negative impact on stall margin (i.e., the point at which the compressor section can no longer sustain an increase in pressure such that the gas turbine engine stalls).
Airflow escaping through the gaps between the rotor blades and the shroud can create gas turbine engine performance losses. In the middle and rear stages of the compressor section, blade performance and operability of the gas turbine engine are highly sensitive to the lower spans (i.e., decreased size) of the rotor blades and the corresponding high clearance to span ratios. Disadvantageously, prior rotor blade airfoil designs have not adequately alleviated the negative effects caused by tip clearance flow.
A rotor blade for a gas turbine engine includes an airfoil that extends in span between a root and a tip. A leading edge and a trailing edge of the airfoil section extend between a chord line. A sweep angle is defined at the leading edge of the airfoil section, and a dihedral angle is defined relative to the chord line of the airfoil section. The amount of sweep and dihedral are applied locally at the tip region of the airfoil section. In one example, the rotor blade is positioned within a compressor section of a gas turbine engine that includes a compressor section, a combustor section and a turbine section.
A method of designing an airfoil for a compressor of a gas turbine engine includes localizing a sweep angle at a leading edge of a tip region of the airfoil, and localizing a dihedral angle at the tip region of the airfoil. The dihedral angle is applied by translating the airfoil in direction normal to a chord of the airfoil.
The various features and advantages of this disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The airfoil 40 of the rotor blade 30 also includes a suction surface 54 and an opposite pressure surface 56. The suction surface 54 is a generally convex surface and the pressure surface 56 is a generally concave surface. The suction surface 54 and the pressure surface 56 are designed conventionally to pressurize the airflow as airflow F is communicated from an upstream direction U to a downstream direction DN. The airflow F flows in an axial direction X that is parallel to the longitudinal centerline axis A of the gas turbine engine A. The rotor blade 30 rotates in a rotational direction (circumferential) Y about the engine centerline axis A. The span 48 of the airfoil 40 is positioned along a radial axis Z of the rotor blade 30.
The example rotor blade 30 includes a sweep angle S (See
Referring to
As illustrated in
The amount of sweep S and dihedral D included on the rotor blade 30 is defined at the tip region 38 of the rotor blade 30 and merged back to a baseline geometry (see
Providing localized sweep S and dihedral D at the tip region 38 of the rotor blade 30 results in airflow being pulled toward the tip region 38 relative to a conventional rotor blade without the sweep and dihedral described above. This reduces the diffusion rate of local flow, which tends to have a lower axial component and is prone to flow reversal. Simulation using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis demonstrates that an airfoil with local sweep and dihedral reduces the entropy generated by the tip clearance flow. At the same time, tip clearance flow through the gaps 36 is reduced. Therefore, the radial distributions of blade exit velocity and stagnation pressure are improved, thus maintaining higher momentum in the region of the tip region 38. The negative effects of stall margin are minimized and gas turbine engine performance and efficiency are improved.
The foregoing description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in any limiting sense. A person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that certain modifications would come within the scope of this disclosure. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4880355 | Vuillet et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4979698 | Lederman | Dec 1990 | A |
5137427 | Shenoy | Aug 1992 | A |
5199851 | Perry et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5332362 | Toulmay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5393199 | Alizadeh | Feb 1995 | A |
5685696 | Zangeneh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5730583 | Alizadeh | Mar 1998 | A |
5992793 | Perry et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6368061 | Capdevila | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6899526 | Doloresco et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901873 | Lang et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6976829 | Kovalsky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7207526 | McCarthy | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7246998 | Kovalsky et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252479 | Bagai et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264200 | Bussom et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7967571 | Wood et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100150729 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |