The present application is the national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2011/068298, filed on Oct. 20, 2011, which claims priority to Application No. DE 10 2010 062 677.5, filed in the Federal Republic of Germany on Dec. 9, 2010.
The present invention relates to a generator device for the voltage supply of a motor vehicle.
Alternating current bridges (rectifiers) are used for rectification in three-phase or alternating current generators (alternators) of motor vehicles. Semiconductor diodes having a p-n junction made of silicon are used in most cases as rectifying elements. Six semiconductor diodes are, for example, interconnected in a three-phase generator to form a B6 bridge. Occasionally, diodes are also connected in parallel, for example, twelve diodes are used instead of six diodes. In alternating current generators having a different number of phases, accordingly adapted diode bridges are used. The diodes are configured for operation at high currents having current densities of more than 500 A/cm2 and at high temperatures having a maximum junction temperature Tj of approximately 225° C. The voltage drop in the forward direction, forward voltage UF, is typically approximately 1 volt for the high currents used. In the case of operation in the reverse direction, only a very low reverse current IR up to a breakdown voltage UZ generally flows. Starting from this voltage, the reverse current increases very strongly. Another voltage rise is thus prevented.
In most cases, Zener diodes (Z diodes) having reverse voltages of approximately 20 volts to 40 volts are used in this context, depending on the electrical system voltage of the motor vehicle. At breakdown, Z diodes may briefly be subjected even to very high currents. They are therefore used for delimiting the overshooting generator voltage in the event of load changes (load dumps). Such diodes are usually packaged in robust press-in diode housings, as described in German Application No. DE 195 49 202 B4, for example.
One disadvantage of such a device is that the forward voltage of the p-n diodes results in conducting-state power losses and thus in an efficiency deterioration of the generator. Since two diodes are on average connected in series during a power output of the generator, the averaged conducting-state power losses in a 100-A generator are approximately 200 W. The associated heating of diodes and rectifiers must be reduced by complex cooling measures, e.g., by using heat sinks or fans.
German Application No. DE 10 2004 056 663 A1 proposes to use so-called high-efficiency diodes (HEDs) instead of the p-n diodes to reduce the conducting-state power losses. High-efficiency diodes (HEDs) are Schottky diodes which, in contrast to conventional Schottky diodes, do not have the barrier lowering effect (BL) caused by the reverse voltage and thus have low reverse currents. High-efficiency Schottky diodes (HEDs) include a combination—monolithically integrated on a semiconductor chip—of a conventional Schottky barrier diode (SBD) together with other elements such as magnetoresistors, p-n junctions, or different barrier metals. They are often implemented in trench technology.
With the aid of high-efficiency Schottky diodes (HED), essentially lower forward voltages UF may be implemented which are in the range of 0.5 V to 0.6 V. The low conducting-state power losses of the diodes increase the efficiency and the output power of the particular generator. Since Schottky diodes, as majority carrier components, switch very quickly, the radio interference suppression of the generator additionally improves in certain frequency ranges by up to 10 dB.
Due to the lower reverse power losses, the complexity for cooling the diodes may be additionally reduced compared to the use of p-n diodes.
A production of high-efficiency Schottky diodes (HEDs) is, however, complex and technically very sophisticated. In addition to the very fine trench structures, which have mesa widths in the range below 500 nm and must be etched into the silicon, a cost-effective production of suitable and stable Schottky contacts represents a challenge, in particular. Nickel silicides or other suitable silicides are preferably used as Schottky contacts. In modern semiconductor plants, in which power MOSFETs are produced, these silicide processes are usually not available.
According to the present invention, it is proposed to use in rectifiers for motor vehicle generators specially produced n-channel MOSFETs in which the gate, the body area, and the source area are electrically fixedly connected to one another and in which the drain area is used as a cathode. Similarly to the HEDs, low forward voltages, which are lower than the forward voltage of a p-n diode, maybe achieved with the aid of these special rectifying elements, which are also referred to as Pseudo-Schottky diodes (PSD). Such a rectifying element preferably has a conducting-state voltage which is lower than 0.7 V when a current flows through it at 500 A/cm2. Preferably, this conducting-state voltage is between 0.5 V and 0.7 V. Such rectifying elements do not include any Schottky contacts and therefore do not need special silicide processes either. They may be produced in both planar and trench technology using slightly modified standard processes for MOSFETs. Being majority carrier components, they again switch very quickly.
One exemplary embodiment of a generator device according to the present invention is illustrated in
If, in contrast to anode A, a positive voltage is applied to cathode connection K, the MOSFET locks, since its gate is on source potential. The current flow is stopped except for a minor reverse current. In this configuration, the MOSFET may even be used as a Z diode. This makes it possible to delimit overvoltages in the case of error, e.g., when the voltage rises due to a sudden load dump. If the voltage exceeds breakdown voltage UZ of the body diode, the diode breaks (avalanche breakdown) and thus prevents a further voltage rise.
If the voltage polarity is reversed, the transistor is operated in the 3rd quadrant. After overcoming a threshold voltage, the current flows since the integrated diode, the so-called body diode, is polarized in the forward direction. Forward voltage UF drops at the diode. In contrast to a system in which the gate is interconnected with the drain connection of the MOSFET, the gate is now electrically connected to the source contact. In this case, conducting-state voltage UON is slightly lower than forward voltage UF. In customary MOSFETs, the difference between these two voltages is, however, very minor. In a 60-V power MOSFET having a threshold voltage UTH of approximately 1.8 V, the difference is in the range of 20 mV, measured in the mA range. In Pseudo-Schottky diodes, additional component-specific properties of the MOSFETs must therefore be changed in a suitable manner compared to conventional transistors.
In principle, the configuration of a Pseudo-Schottky diode (PSD) is largely identical to the configuration of a conventional power MOSFET, as described in the textbook Halbleiter-Leistungsbauelemente by J. Lutz, Springer Verlag 2006. In contrast to a conventional MOSFET, the gate connection is, however, usually not separate, but is directly connected to the source area. However, other changes remain to be carried out on the MOSFET, which is used as the PSD, so that a low conducting-state voltage UON occurs.
This is explained in the following:
One functionality when operating in the 3rd quadrant of the MOSFET, the forward direction of the PSD, may also be seen as operating a MOSFET in the 1st quadrant with source and drain connections S and D being reversed. In this case, source area S becomes drain connection D′ and drain area D becomes source connection S′. This change of names makes an operation in the 3rd quadrant an operation in the 1st quadrant using the usual identification. P-doped body area B, highly n-doped drain area D′ (former source area S), and gate G are then on drain potential UD′. In this case, the voltage between D′ and S′ cannot, however, exceed diode forward voltage UF. Based on these observations, it is detected that due to UD′S′=UGS′, the transistor is always operated at saturation, and due to UD′S′=UBS′>0, the p-doped body area is positively biased with regard to S′. A positive voltage at the body area, however, reduces threshold voltage UTH of a MOSFET. The space charge reduced at the body area due to the positive potential is offset by a higher inversion charge.
To obtain a conducting-state voltage UON comparable to an HED, a MOSFET which is suitable as a PSD must have a very low threshold voltage UTH as well as a noteworthy reduction due to the body effect. These two requirements are basically contradictory. For achieving a great body effect, it is thus favorable to select the gate oxide thickness and the body doping to be as high as possible. The body doping is, however, already determined by the selected reverse voltage. This, in turn, is contradictory to the requirement for a low threshold voltage UTH. For this reason, the threshold voltage must be adjusted independently of the body effect with the aid of an additional measure. This may take place with the aid of a threshold implant using donors, for example. In this way, the p-doping on the surface of the body area is reduced and therefore so is threshold voltage UTH. With the aid of these measures, Pseudo-Schottky diodes are obtained which have HED comparable forward voltages and additionally act as Z diodes.
The structure therefore corresponds to a conventional planar DMOS structure.
In contrast to a conventional planar DMOS structure, the gate electrode is, in this case, not electrically insulated from source and body areas 4 and 3, but is electrically connected to them. Above polysilicon layer 6 and source and body areas 4 and 3, which are not covered by same, there is a metal layer 7 which electrically connects the three areas to one another. Source area 4 is in addition also directly connected to area 6. This is, however, not absolutely necessary since the connection is also present through metal layer 7. Metal layer 7 is preferably made of AlSiCu or AlCu, or copper. Above metal layer 7 and below substrate 1, there are metal layer systems 8 and 9 which ensure the ohmic connection of substrate 1 and in addition form a solderable front side 8 and a back side 9. The metal layer system may, for example, be Ti/NiV/Ag. The component has only two connections: anode connection A (area 8) and cathode connection K (area 9). To reduce the threshold voltage, p-doped body areas 3 of a PSD are doped less highly on their surfaces, at least in the channel area. This area is not indicated in
Another exemplary embodiment for the present invention is now explained again based on
If in the “load dump case” the voltage limitation by the PSDs is not sufficient in itself, conventional Z diodes may also be switched in parallel to the PSDs in the rectifier. In this case, the breakdown voltage of the PSD must be selected to be greater than that of the Z diodes. The PSDs in the forward direction then take over the current, while the breakdown takes place exclusively in the additional Z diodes.
Furthermore, structures may be used in the PSDs which additionally have another integrated p-n junction, for example, which determines the breakdown voltage.
Furthermore, circuits may be used in which only the plus diodes or alternatively thereto only the minus diodes are replaced by PSDs in each case.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 062 677 | Dec 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/068298 | 10/20/2011 | WO | 00 | 8/26/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/076231 | 6/14/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5508534 | Nakamura | Apr 1996 | A |
5744994 | Williams | Apr 1998 | A |
5818084 | Williams | Oct 1998 | A |
6252381 | Schenk | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6549439 | Yu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6979861 | Rodov et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7142015 | Kuang | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7221127 | Masson | May 2007 | B2 |
8531226 | Montalbo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20030222290 | Rodov et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080158926 | Umeda et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100034000 | Battista | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078707 | Haeberlen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100135053 | Morimoto | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20130313948 | Zucker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101065848 | Oct 2007 | CN |
101897112 | Nov 2010 | CN |
195 49 202 | Jul 1997 | DE |
100 42 526 | Aug 2001 | DE |
10042526 | Aug 2001 | DE |
10 2004 056 663 | Jan 2006 | DE |
0807979 | Nov 1997 | EP |
2000512805 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2004153887 | May 2004 | JP |
2007072226 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Jun. 6, 2012, issued in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/EP2011/068298. |
XP011203330, Rodov et al., “Super Barrier Rectifier—A New Generation of Power Diode”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 44, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2008, pp. 234-237. |
Kolar, et al. “Vienna Rectifier II—A Novel Single-Stage High-Frequency Isolated Three-Phase PWM Rectifier System”, 1998 IEEE, Technical Univ. Vienna, pp. 23-33. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130329476 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |