This disclosure generally relates to a fin for a heat exchanger assembly, and more particularly relates to a retention feature in the middle of the fin configured to engage with a tube to prevent fall-out of the fin prior to brazing of the heat exchanger.
Heat exchangers such as radiators, evaporators, and condensers are commonly formed by an arrangement of alternating tubes and corrugated fins. A known method of manufacturing such heat exchangers places the tubes and fins in a stacker that pressed the arrangement to a desired dimension, and then subjects the arrangement to a brazing process. If not adequately retained, a fin can undesirable drop below the bottom face of the heat exchanger during the brazing process.
In accordance with one embodiment, a fin characterized by a corrugated shape configured to be interposed between adjacent instances of tubes of a heat exchanger assembly is provided. The fin includes a plurality of planar portions, a radiused portion, and a retention feature. The plurality of planar portions is configured to extend between the adjacent instances of the tubes. The radiused portion is located between adjacent planar portions and is configured to be in thermal contact with a tube proximate thereto. The retention feature is located substantially mid-way between a leading edge and a trailing edge of the fin. The retention feature is configured to contact the tube in a manner effective to prevent fall-out of the fin prior to brazing of the heat exchanger assembly.
In another embodiment, a heat exchanger assembly is provided. The assembly includes a plurality of parallel spaced apart tubes, and a fin. The tubes are configured to convey coolant therethrough. The fin is characterized by a corrugated shape and is interposed between adjacent instances of the tubes. The fin defines a plurality of planar portions configured to extend between the adjacent instances of the tubes. Each planer portion is joined to an adjacent planer portion by a radiused portion that is in thermal contact with a tube proximate thereto. The radiused portion includes a retention feature located substantially mid-way between a leading edge and a trailing edge of the fin. The retention feature is configured to contact the tube in a manner effective to prevent fall-out of the fin prior to brazing of the heat exchanger assembly.
Further features and advantages will appear more clearly on a reading of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, which is given by way of non-limiting example only and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring again to
While the examples set forth herein show a single retention feature on each radiused portion, multiple retention features are contemplated. Furthermore, other shapes of retention features are contemplate such as a sharp edge provided by a ‘birds-mouth’ feature formed by piercing the radiused portion, or an S-shaped coil portion.
Advantages of the fin 32 described herein include: (1) reduces cosmetic damage on the outside face of the heat exchanger caused by the candy ribbon effect on the edges (leading or trailing) of the fin 32, (2) reduces the need to limit the height of the raised portion to within the elasticity limits of the material, (3) reduces the sensitivity of the relative position between the tube 28 and fin 32, and (4) the retention feature is controllably collapsible to create a secure fit between the tube and fin that holds its position during the cooling and heating cycles of the brazing process.
The retention feature 44 may be formed within a form roll station. The traditional stripper discs in the middle position of the form roll assembly may be replaced with a neutral form disc that will have a larger diameter than the adjacent discs next to it. As the form rolls are driven, the engagement of the neutral form disc at the larger diameter will pierce through the material as it rolls through its mating discs root diameter. The material as it is pierced will curl back thus protruding above the radiused portion 42. The collapsible raised middle margin created by a retention feature 44 on the top and bottom radiused portions creates the interference required with the tube during the stacking process to hold the fin in position during the brazing process.
When the assembly 20 is assembled, the fins and tubes are arranged in an alternating manner. Once completed, an operator activates the core assembly machine to “squeeze” the fin and tube arrangement to a final set dimension to allow the headers to be placed onto the heat exchanger assembly. When squeezed, the retention feature 44 collapses on itself to create interference between the tube and the fin effective to hold the fin in position during the brazing process.
The fin 32 described herein improves the present manufacturing process by: (1) eliminates the need to minimize the height of the raised margin as the retention feature if formed by piercing the material of the fin; (2) eliminates the candy ribbon cosmetic effect of the fin at the core face since any collapsing of the fin is internal to the heat exchanger assembly and visually unnoticeable; (3) eliminates the exact position requirements of the fin relative to the tube to eliminate the candy ribbon effect as the collapsible middle margin formed by the retention feature 44 can shift position on the tube internally to the core and not create cosmetic damage; and (4) the material collapsing on itself creates a solid interference between the tube and fin to allow it to hold its position during the brazing process.
Accordingly, a heat exchanger assembly (the assembly 20) and a fin 32 for the assembly 20 is provided. The retention feature 44 deforms or collapses during the stacking process to create a “material jam” between the fin and tube to hold the center in position during the braze process. Having retention feature 44 located about mid-way on the fin 32 is advantageous if the internal convolutions or louvers buckle during the stacking process it is unnoticeable on the face of the core as not to create a visual quality defect. The fin 32 being held in position by the retention feature 44 eliminates dropped fins in the brazing process. The tooling to create the retention feature 44 can be used with either flush face cores or offset cores. The retention feature 44 can be used with both welded and extruded tubes, and can be adapted to prevent damage to delicate tubes. Moving the anti-drop feature (e.g. the retention feature 44) from the outside edge of the fin (e.g. the raised lip 262) to the internal portion of the fin eliminates a source of visual quality defects.
While this invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiments thereof, it is not intended to be so limited, but rather only to the extent set forth in the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1950500 | Loprich | Mar 1934 | A |
3003749 | Morse | Oct 1961 | A |
3265127 | Nickol | Aug 1966 | A |
3266567 | Kinal | Aug 1966 | A |
3422777 | Plegat | Jan 1969 | A |
3537517 | Doyle | Nov 1970 | A |
4034453 | Tomita | Jul 1977 | A |
4067219 | Bianchi | Jan 1978 | A |
4086959 | Habdas | May 1978 | A |
4311193 | Verhaeghe | Jan 1982 | A |
4535839 | Sacca | Aug 1985 | A |
4538677 | Bodas | Sep 1985 | A |
4676304 | Koisuka | Jun 1987 | A |
5056586 | Bemisderfer | Oct 1991 | A |
5183629 | Canat | Feb 1993 | A |
5271458 | Yamamoto | Dec 1993 | A |
5386629 | Ouchi | Feb 1995 | A |
5390731 | Selm | Feb 1995 | A |
5505257 | Goetz, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5558155 | Ito | Sep 1996 | A |
5617737 | Christensen | Apr 1997 | A |
5669438 | Beales | Sep 1997 | A |
5738169 | Stoynoff | Apr 1998 | A |
5765634 | Martins | Jun 1998 | A |
5787972 | Beamer | Aug 1998 | A |
5867904 | Harris | Feb 1999 | A |
6247527 | Paulman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6397939 | Swiger | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6439300 | Falta | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494254 | Laveran | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6662615 | Hunt | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6799630 | Kato | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6874345 | Stoynoff, Jr. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7913750 | Huang et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8881797 | Melo | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020195235 | Falta | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20060175047 | Hattori | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080302131 | Higashiyama | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025916 | Meshenky | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090242180 | Gonzales | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20150034289 | Seo | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4026988 | Feb 1992 | DE |
19808202 | Sep 1999 | DE |
1 295 288 | Nov 1972 | GB |
Entry |
---|
English Translation of DE19808202. |
https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia Deformation (Engineering) Accessed: Mar. 27, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160061537 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |