This application claims priority of Canadian patent application 2,380,215 filed Apr. 4, 2002.
General field of this invention is a method and apparatus for manufacturing dual-component fibers from thermoplastic materials, such as glass or some other mineral or polymer materials, by using a rotary fiber forming process. More particularly this invention belongs to a category of devices for centrifuging dual-component curly glass fibers, where the fibre curl is the result of distinct differences in some physical properties or parameters of the two separate glasses. A most common approach is to utilize two unique glass formulations with a significant difference in their coefficients of thermal expansion.
Typical glass fibre thermal or acoustical insulation product is made of rather short, single glass and basically straight glass fibers. Common method of manufacturing these glass wool type fibers is a rotary fiberizing process, where a single molten glass composition is forced by a high speed rotation through the orifices in the peripheral wall of a centrifuge, usually referred to as a spinner, and is further subjected to the combined action of a high temperature flame and low temperature/high velocity compressed air blasts.
It has been recognized some forty years ago that curly or non-straight glass fibre geometry should in principle offer many insulation product advantages. Some of these highly desired product attributes include: substantially higher allowable product compression ratio, offering substantial cost savings in product storage and transportation (distribution), also in packaging materials; better volume filling ability; lower dust level; less itch; potential for much lower organic binder level required to assure product integrity, lower binder cost; reduced organic emissions. One can also reasonably expect a slightly higher product thermal resistance, meaning possibility of increased earnings due to consequential density reductions. All of these expectations, to a varying degree, have turned out to be true.
The very first attempts to make curly glass fibre were made by Owens-Corning in the 60's. Slayter et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 2,927,621 discloses the production of curly glass fibers by passing a continuous single glass composition fibre through opposed contoured skirts. However, this thick and long fibre is unsuitable for insulating products. Tiede in U.S. Pat. No. 3,073,005 discloses a non-rotary fiberizing process for making bicomponent curly glass fibre; two glasses with differing thermal expansion coefficients are put into side by side contact. This bicomponent curly fibre was not meant to be used for insulation products. Some other patents disclosing methods of making curly or kinky glass fibers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,236,616 and 4,145,199, but still these methods are not that practical for making insulation product.
It is generally accepted that a non-rotary fiber forming process can not effectively compete with the rotary one for the economic manufacture of a typical glass fibre insulating product, because of a substantially lower throughput capacity and too coarse fibre to make a good glass wool. As a consequence, some methods of imparting kink by pulling fibre from a textile bushing and mechanically crimping it by passing fibre, while still in a hot state, through a series of opposed intermeshing gears are not a viable option.
Stalego in U.S. Pat. No. 2,998,620 discloses a rotary method for making bicomponent curly glass fibers, where two glass compositions differ in thermal expansion coefficients. There is no mention of using these curly fibers for insulation products.
In 1995, Owens-Corning obtained patents for a new technology of manufacturing bicomponent curly fibre by a rotary fiberizing technique. The clear objective was to use this fibre for thermal insulation products. The scope of patenting is wide, including process, apparatus and product. Some other major manufacturers of fibre glass insulation (Isover Saint Gobain and Johns-Manville) were also granted some patents in this field.
A typical approach to manufacture curly bicomponent glass fibre by a rotary fiberizing, is to use two glass formulations with widely different coefficients of thermal expansion; and then feed these two glasses as separate glass streams, in a radially displaced configuration, into some sort of integrated glass distributor inside a spinner assembly; force first and second glasses into alternate vertical compartments circumferentially spaced around the interior of the spinner peripheral wall, and finally centrifuge these two glasses through orifices drilled in the spinner peripheral wall along the adjacent compartments dividing line such that the two glasses join each other in side to side contact before emerging from a single orifice as a bicomponent fibre.
Clearly, there is a need for increasing throughput capacity of these dual-glass spinners; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,468,275, 5,474,590 and 5,595,766 disclose some possible ways of addressing the capacity issue by using elongated orifices, slanted rather than vertical glass compartments and multiple exits for each inlet, respectively.
Some other areas of concern in the development process of highly effective and practical dual-glass spinner designs include some aspects of strengthening spinner structure by using some more specialized alloys and spinner forming methods (U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,157). Modified spinner geometries are adapted for radial balancing during the centrifuging operation, and as such less prone to thermally induced spinner geometry deformations (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,582,841 and 6,167,729 B1), and simplified fiberizing orifice configurations, i.e., replacing a typical Y- or V-shaped hole configurations with radially drilled ones. These are less expensive to drill, offering reduced hole wear and extended dual-glass spinner service life (U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,928).
The object of the present invention is to provide a dual-glass spinner for manufacturing quality bicomponent curly glass fibre at high production rates, i.e., at a throughput capacity in principle comparable with that for a standard single-component spinner of the same diameter.
The present invention approach to deal with the dual-glass spinner fiberizing throughput issue is to use horizontal rather than a vertical arrangement of glass compartments on the inside of the spinner peripheral wall, and combine it with a unique hole drilling concept, so the resulting dual-glass hole pattern, as seen on the spinner face from the outside, is basically the same staggered, dense and uniform hole pattern as for a single-glass spinner; both in general appearance (excluding the exit orifice somewhat oval shape) and the total number of holes per spinner (spinner hole count).
Horizontal flanges or baffles serve also as effective stiffeners or stiffening ribs, adding some mechanical integrity and extra strength to the dual-glass spinner structure, particularly against spinner face deformation.
Clearly, in the present invention, there are numerous possibilities. Generally speaking two major paths emerge, namely: use bicomponent curly fibre alone, or in a combination with some other fibre(s), not necessarily glass fibre.
Owens-Corning manufactures attic and crawlspace thermal insulation. This is a binderless, plastic sleeve enclosed product, entirely made of bicomponent curly Miraflex(*) glass fibre. There are also U.S. patents disclosing thermal insulation products being a blend of straight single-glass and curly dual-glass fibers, cf. U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,645.
A mixture of single-glass straight fibre with a dual-glass curly fibre can be made off-line, particularly for a loose-fill type insulation. Certainly making it during the fibre manufacturing process is the preferred way of doing it. On a typical multi-spinner line, a mixed single-glass/dual-glass thermal insulation product can be made by a proper sequencing of standard single-glass and dual-glass spinners.
Thermal insulation material made as a mixture of single-glass straight and dual-glass curly fibers is expected to allow for substantially higher compression ratios during the product packaging stage, since a curly fiber component certainly can offer some extra springiness to the product, and this results in a better thickness recovery after compression release. It is likely that less binder will be needed to assure a required level of product integrity. Curly fibre has a better volume filling ability than a so called straight one, and naturally allows for some degree of fibre interlocking, mutual entanglement and self-cohesion. Slightly reduced thermal conductivity and therefore potential for some density reduction, is possible. Skin irritation and product dustiness, which are factors particularly important to product end-users or installers, should in principle be less pronounced as well.
The object of the present invention is to provide a dual-glass spinner for manufacturing bi-component curly glass fibers at a production rate in principle comparable with the single-glass spinner operation. A mixed dual-glass/single-glass fibre insulation product can be made with a substantially improved allowable compression ratio, as determined by the minimum required thickness recovery after unpacking, much reduced binder content, and somewhat improved thermal insulation value.
The inventors have produced a spinner for use in producing a bi-component fibreglass insulation product, including an interior slinger cup; said slinger cup being circumferentially secured in a fixed manner to a bottom of said spinner inwardly of said spinner periphery; said slinger cup having a bottom portion extending inwardly and being adapted to receive a first molten glass A which, through centrifugal movement, forces said glass A in an outward direction; said slinger cup further comprising a vertically extending circumferential wall and an upper horizontally extending flange adapted to receive a second stream of molten glass B with a different coefficient of thermal expansion than said first glass A; said glass B being forced outwardly through centrifugal movement; said spinner having a plurality of vertical baffles creating vertical chambers inwardly of a spinner peripheral wall; said slinger cup having a plurality of openings on an outwardly facing wall, such that glass A emerges into first of said vertical chambers and glass B emerges above said slinger cup horizontal flange into second alternative vertical chambers; said chambers being greater than 2 in number and lesser than 32 in number; said spinner further comprising a plurality of horizontal baffles disposed between said vertical chambers such that glass A and glass B enter separately from said vertical chambers between said baffles; said baffles creating alternate vertically disposed horizontal chambers; said spinner on its inner periphery wall having a plurality of apertures adapted to receive glass A from one horizontal chamber and glass B from an alternative upper or lower horizontal chamber; said apertures opening into either glass A or glass B channels; whereupon in operation each one of glass A channels and each one of glass B channels connects to a single common orifice through the spinner exterior peripheral wall; said spinner wall having a large number of orderly placed, single common orifices, thereby creating a bi-component primary glass fibre, which, after further attenuation by a combined action of a rotating spinner, external main burner and compressed air blower create curly irregularly shaped glass fibers, due to glass A and B having different coefficients of thermal expansion.
The invention will be more clearly described in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
On examination of
As can be seen in
Before proceeding with the essence of the invention, i.e. the peripheral hole formation, one must understand in
Separating the slotted bottom radiation shield 25 from the spinner 1 is a slotted spacer ring 23. Spinner 1 is also equipped with a number of spinner elevation adjustment spacers for adjusting the spinner in relation to the mounting hub 26. Between the slotted bottom radiation shield 25 and the spinner bottom are a number of bottom radiation shield exit slots 28. Mounting cap 27 mounts the spinner 1 to the mounting hub 26 by means of bolts.
In
As glass A progresses outwardly through cylindrical cavities 14a, it enters an inlet hole 17 on the inside of the outer peripheral spinner wall 16. Similarly, as glass B progresses outwardly through cylindrical cavities 14b, it also enters an inlet hole 17. From common inlet holes 17, in a preferred embodiment, a plurality of channels emerge, some lead outwards radially and some are angularly slanted and lead outwards.
In a preferred embodiment there are four such channels generally labeled, as is shown in
Drawings 8A, 8B, 8C and 9A, 9B and 9C show various configurations through different views, wherein glass A and glass B are lead through inlet holes 17 and the unique configuration of slanted and radially drilled channels which result in a uniform surface density, staggered and high hole count pattern of exit holes 19a and 19b on spinner surface, highly resembling or even matching a typical drilled hole configuration for the conventional single-glass spinners.
In
In
In
The essence of the invention is a multiple, horizontal and alternate layering of glasses A and B along the height of inner surface of the spinner peripheral wall, combined with extruding them through the unique geometry of channels 18a, 18b, 18c and 18d, drilled in spinner peripheral wall in such a way that the exit hole pattern for a dual-glass spinner is virtually the same as, or largely resembles the one used for a standard single-glass spinner of the same diameter. Although a preferred embodiment of the invention has been discussed, it is to be understood that the essence of the invention is to create a dual glass fibre or a bi-component fibre of a twisted or curly nature in high capacity output through the manipulation of vertical and horizontal flanges and a plurality of outgoing channels from glasses A and B which come together side by side through outlet hole type 19a and outlet hole type 19b.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2380215 | Apr 2002 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2927621 | Slayter et al. | Mar 1960 | A |
2998620 | Stalego | Sep 1961 | A |
3073005 | Tiede | Jan 1963 | A |
3236616 | Stalego et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3304164 | Charpentier et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
4145199 | Russell | Mar 1979 | A |
4203745 | Battigelli et al. | May 1980 | A |
4203746 | Battigelli et al. | May 1980 | A |
4203748 | Battigelli et al. | May 1980 | A |
4203774 | Battigelli et al. | May 1980 | A |
4636234 | Huey et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4689061 | Britts, II et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5118332 | Hinze | Jun 1992 | A |
5468275 | Lin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474590 | Lin | Dec 1995 | A |
5482527 | Czastkiewicz | Jan 1996 | A |
5509953 | Gavin | Apr 1996 | A |
5514199 | Houpt | May 1996 | A |
5529596 | Loftus et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536550 | Houpt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5582841 | Watton et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591459 | Snyder | Jan 1997 | A |
5595766 | Houpt et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5618328 | Lin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629089 | Berdan, II et al. | May 1997 | A |
5647883 | Houpt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5672429 | Berdan II et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702658 | Pellegrin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5723216 | Houpt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743157 | Hinze | Apr 1998 | A |
5743932 | Houpt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5770309 | Houpt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779760 | Watton et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785996 | Snyder | Jul 1998 | A |
5786082 | Evans et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5968645 | Caccini et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987928 | Bernard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6128929 | Peterson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167729 | Watton et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6245282 | Baker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
20040112093 | Beaufils et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040144706 | Beaufils et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030188557 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |