The present invention relates to an image pick-up lens system which projects an image of an object onto an image pick-up surface, the image pick-up lens system being suitable for use in products such as camera modules.
In recent years, camera modules for taking photos have begun to be incorporated in mobile terminals such as mobile phones and lap-top computers. Downsizing the camera modules is a prerequisite for enhancing the portability of these apparatuses. The camera module operates with an image pickup device such as a CCD (Charged Coupled Device) or a CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor). Recently, a pixel having the size of approximately a few micrometers has become commercially feasible, and an image pickup device with high resolution and a compact size can now be mass manufactured and marketed. This is accelerating the demand for downsizing of image pick-up lens systems so that they are able to be suitably used with miniaturized image pickup devices. It is also increasing expectations of cost reductions in image pick-up lens systems, commensurate with the lower costs enjoyed by modern image pickup devices. All in all, an image pick-up lens system needs to satisfy the oft-conflicting requirements of compactness, low cost, and excellent optical performance.
Compactness means in particular that a length from a lens edge of the lens system to an image pick-up surface should be as short as possible.
Low cost means in particular that the lens system should include as few lenses as possible; and that the lenses should be able to be formed from a resin or a plastic and be easily assembled.
Excellent optical performance can be classified into the following two main requirements:
First, a high brightness requirement, which means that the lens system should have a small F number (FNo.). Generally, the FNo. should be 2.8 or less.
Second, a high resolution requirement, which means that the lens system should appropriately correct fundamental aberrations such as spherical aberration, coma aberration, field curvature, astigmatism, distortion, and chromatic aberration.
In a lens system which satisfies the low cost requirement, a single lens made from a resin or a plastic is desired. However, it is difficult for the single lens system to correct chromatic aberration and achieve excellent optical performance.
For appropriately correct chromatic aberration, it is desired to employ two or even more lenses. Generally, in order to correct chromatic aberration, the two lenses of the system must be made from different materials, with the lenses having a relatively large difference being their respective Abbe constants. Because there are only a few varieties of plastic and resin materials which can be suitably used to make lenses, even if the two lenses are made from a different plastic or resin material, the range of variation of optical properties of the two lenses is limited. This makes it difficult to effectively correct chromatic aberration. Therefore, in most two-lens systems which have excellent optical performance, at least one of the lenses is made from optical glass. As a result, such systems generally yield limited cost efficiency, and tend to be unduly heavy.
Another important consideration is that plastic and resin materials are prone to absorb water. For example, the water absorbency of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is 1.5%, and the water absorbency of polycarbonate (PC) is 0.4%. Among the plastic or resin materials which can be suitably used to make lenses, only zeonex materials (polyolefin resins or cyclo-olefin polymers) have relatively low water absorbency. The water absorbencies are less than 0.01%. Zeonex materials are available from the Japanese Zeon Corporation. Therefore unless a non-glass lens is made from a zeonex material, it is liable to absorb water and deform. As a result, the optical performance of the lens system is diminished. All in all, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
An image pick-up lens system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes an aperture stop, and a meniscus-shaped lens having a concave first surface on an object side and a convex second surface on an image side. The first surface of the lens is aspheric. The second surface of the lens has a diffraction grating provided thereon. The aperture stop and the meniscus-shaped lens are aligned in that order from the object side to an image side. Preferably, the first and second surfaces of the lens are aspheric.
According to a first aspect, the following condition is satisfied:
0.1<R2/R1<0.5, (1)
wherein, R1 is an absolute value of a radius of curvature of a vertex of the first surface of the lens on the object side, and R2 is an absolute value of a radius of curvature of a vertex of the second surface of the lens on the image side.
According to a second aspect, to limit a thickness of the lens, the following condition is satisfied:
0.5<d2/R2<1.5, (2)
According to a third aspect, to correct chromatic aberration, the following condition is satisfied:
200<−C2×f<450, (3)
Further, to limit total length from the aperture stop to an image pick-up surface and make the lens system easy to manufacture, the following condition is satisfied:
d1/T<0.15 (4)
Further still, the same lens is made from a plastic or a resin material. Preferably, the lens is made from a zeonex material or an equivalent material having low water absorbency.
The lens system according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention can guarantee that the diffraction grating has a relatively large critical dimension. Thus, the diffraction grating is relatively easy to manufacture. In particular, the diffraction grating can be mass manufactured by molding technology at a reduced cost. In addition, the diffraction grating helps the lens system to appropriately correct foundational aberrations. Further, because the lens is made from a plastic or a resin, the manufacture cost is reduced. Moreover, because the zeonex material is employed to make the lenses, reduction of the optical performance of the lens system due to deformation of the lenses caused by water absorbency is prevented.
Other advantages and novel features will become more apparent from the following detailed description of embodiments when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The aperture stop 10 is arranged closest to the object in order to narrow down an incident angle of chief rays being projected onto the image pick-up surface 40 located at the image side. In addition, this arrangement of the aperture stop 10 helps shorten a total length of the lens system. For further cost reduction, the aperture stop 10 is preferably formed directly on the first surface (not labeled) of the lens 20 on the object side. In practice, a portion of the first surface of the lens 20 through which light rays are not transmitted is coated with a black material, which functions as the aperture stop 10.
The lens system satisfies the following condition:
0.1<R2/R1<0.5, (1)
wherein, R1 is an absolute value of a radius of curvature of a vertex of the first surface of the lens 20, and R2 is an absolute value of a radius of curvature of a vertex of the second surface of the lens 20. Condition (1) governs a distribution of refracting power for the lens 20, in order to correct monochromatic aberrations. When the ratio R2/R1 is above the upper limit of 0.5, R2 is too large and the refracting power of the second surface of the lens 20 is reduced. In order that the lens 20 has a proper refracting power, a thickness of the lens 20 is generally increased. Thus, zones of the diffraction grating of the lens 20 are increased, and the critical dimension of the diffraction grating is apt to be too small. In such case, the diffraction grating cannot be readily manufactured. When the ratio R2/R1 is below the lower limit of 0.1, R2 is too small. Thus, monochromatic aberration of the lens system, especially field curvature, is increased. It is difficult to appropriately correct the monochromatic aberration.
Preferably, in order to provide low cost and excellent optical performance, the lens system satisfies the following condition:
0.5<d2/R2<1.5, (2)
wherein, d2 is a thickness of the lens 20; that is, a distance from the vertex of the first surface to the vertex of the second surface of the lens 20. Condition (2) is for limiting the thickness of the lens 20. When the ratio d2/R2 is above the upper limit of 1.5, zones of the diffraction grating of the lens 20 are increased, and the critical dimension of the diffraction grating is apt to be too small. In such case, the diffraction grating cannot be readily manufactured. When the ratio d2/R2 is below the lower limit of 0.5, curvature of the lens 20 is generally increased, in order that the lens 20 has a certain refracting power. In such case, it is difficult to appropriately correct monochromatic aberration of the lens system.
Preferably, the lens system satisfies the following condition:
(3) 200<−C2×f<450,
wherein, C2 is the power phase coefficient of the phase function of the diffraction grating formed on the second surface of the lens 20, and f is the focal length of the lens system. Condition (3) is for limiting the share of refracting power of the diffraction grating on the second surface of the lens 20. In one aspect, when the ratio −C2×f is above the lower limit of 200, the diffraction grating has a relatively large critical dimension and is thus relatively easy to manufacture. In another aspect, when the ratio −C2×f is below the upper limit of 450, the diffraction grating has proper refracting power and can appropriately correct chromatic aberration of the lens system.
Further, the lens system satisfies the following condition:
d1/T<0.15, (4)
wherein, d1 is a length from the aperture stop 10 to the first surface of the lens 20, and T is a total length from the aperture stop 10 to the image pick-up surface 40. Condition (4) is for limiting a position of the aperture stop 10. When the lens system satisfies the condition, the aperture stop 10 is positioned adjacent the lens 20. Thus, the lens system is favorable to correcting astigmatism and distortion of the lens system. In addition, the lens system is favorable to shortening a total length thereof. Furthermore, the lens system is favorable to lessening projection heights of chief rays being projected at the first surface of the lens 20. Thus, zones of the diffraction grating are decreased, and the critical dimension of the diffraction grating is relatively large. This makes the diffraction grating relatively easy to manufacture.
Also, in order to simplify the required manufacturing technology and reduce manufacturing costs, the lens 20 is made from an optical plastic or an optical resin. Preferably, the lens 20 is made from a zeonex material or an equivalent material having low water absorbency, for preventing the lens from deforming due to water absorption. Accordingly, the optical performance of the lens system can be preserved.
The above explanations outline fundamental constituent features of the present invention. Examples of the lens system will be described below with reference to
In each example, at least one surface of the lens 20 is aspheric. The lens 20 is made from the 480R type of zeonex material, which is available from the Japanese Zeon Corporation. The 480R type of zeonex material has a refractive index of 1.531170 and an Abbe constant of 56.0. Alternatively, the lens 20 is made from another material having characteristics similar to those of the 480R type of zeonex material. The shape of each aspheric surface is provided by expression 1 below. Expression 1 is based on a Cartesian coordinate system, with the vertex of the surface being the origin, and the optical axis extending from the vertex being the x-axis.
wherein, x is a height from a plane which is tangent with the vertex of the surface to the surface, h is a height from the optical axis to the surface, c is a vertex curvature, k is a conic constant, and A2i are 2i-th order correction coefficients of the aspheric surface.
The diffraction grating is formed on the second surface of the lens 20, and the diffraction grating profile is provided by the phase modulation expression 2 below.
wherein, φ(r) is equal to an integer multiple of 2πr, is the height from the optical axis of the lens 20 to the surface of the diffraction grating profile, and C2i is the 2i-th power phase coefficient of the phase function of the diffraction grating.
Tables 1, 2 and 3 show lens data of a lens system of a first exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 4, 5 and 6 show lens data of a lens system of a second exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 7, 8 and 9 show lens data of a lens system of a third exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 10, 11 and 12 show lens data of a lens system of a fourth exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 13, 14 and 15 show lens data of a lens system of a fifth exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 16, 17 and 18 show lens data of a lens system of a sixth exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Tables 19, 20 and 21 show lens data of a lens system of a seventh exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Table 22 compares focal lengths and other parameters across Examples 1 through 7.
It is believed that the present embodiments and their advantages will be understood from the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the examples hereinbefore described merely being preferred or exemplary embodiments of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004 1 0051451 | Sep 2004 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6055105 | Boku et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
20020041451 | Harada | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030016454 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030117723 | Shinohara | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030193605 | Yamaguchi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040012861 | Yamaguchi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060050410 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |