The following disclosure relates to a fire protection system for rack storage, and in particular, to an in-rack sprinkler system capable of protecting exposed, expanded and unexpanded, plastics.
Rack storage is a conventional storage arrangement used in various industries and facilities. As provided in Section 3.9.3.7 of the U.S. National Fire Protection Association Standard 13 (NFPA 13) (2007 Ed.), a “rack” is “[a]ny combination of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal members that supports stored materials. Shelving in some racks can be solid, slatted, or open. Racks can also be fixed, portable, or movable. Loading commodities can be either manual—using lift trucks, stacker cranes, or hand placement—or automatic—using machine-controlled storage and retrieval systems.” Conventionally, a commodity 102 to be protected is placed on a pallet 104 and the commodity 102 and the pallet 104 are stored together on a shelf 106 in a rack 108, as shown in
Racks can be single row, double row, or multiple row, with or without solid shelving. The terms “single row”, “double row”, and “multiple row” refer to the depth of the rack configuration in terms of the number of pallets that can be stored back to back. For example, a double row rack 108 has a depth that can accommodate two pallets back to back, as shown in the end elevation view of the schematic shown in
Fire protection sprinklers are conventionally connected to a conduit to receive pressurized fire-extinguishing fluid, such as water. A typical fire protection sprinkler has a base with a threaded portion for connection to the conduit, and an output orifice to output the fire-extinguishing fluid to provide fire control and/or fire suppression. The output orifice is sealed by a seal cap that is held in place by a release mechanism. The release mechanism is designed to release the seal cap under predetermined conditions, thereby initiating the flow of the fire-extinguishing fluid. A typical release mechanism includes a thermally-responsive element, e.g., a frangible bulb or fusible link, and may also include a latching mechanism.
Certain conventional fire protection sprinklers have a pair of arms that extend from the base portion and meet at a hub portion to form a frame. The hub portion is spaced apart from the output orifice of the base portion and is aligned with a longitudinal axis of the base portion. The hub portion may have a set-screw configured to apply a pre-tension force to the release mechanism. A deflector may be mounted on the hub, transverse to the output orifice, to provide dispersion of the output fire-extinguishing fluid.
Fire protection sprinklers may be mounted on a fluid conduit running along a ceiling and may either extend downward from the conduit, referred to as a “pendent” configuration, or may extend upward from the conduit, referred to as an “upright” configuration. Alternatively, fire protection sprinklers may be mounted on a wall, a certain distance below the ceiling, referred to as a “horizontal sidewall” configuration. An output orifice of a horizontal sidewall sprinkler is oriented so that the fire-extinguishing fluid is output horizontally and sprays onto an area to be protected in front of the sprinkler.
An “extended coverage storage sprinkler (specific application),” as described in Section 55.1 of the Standard for Automatic Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service, published by Underwriters' Laboratories, 11th Ed., Nov. 4, 2005 (UL199) is a sprinkler that is intended to be installed using the extended coverage area up to 196 square feet (e.g., 14 ft by 14 ft) (18.21 square meters) (e.g., 4.27 meters by 4.27 meters), and using specific application criteria specified in NFPA 13. These extended coverage storage sprinklers (specific application) incorporate a heat responsive element and release mechanism that has a response time equal to or less than that of a standard response sprinkler used on sprinklers designed for standard spacings up to 100 square feet (e.g., 10 ft by 10 ft) (9.29 square meters) (3.05 meters by 3.05 meters). Extended coverage sprinklers are installed in accordance with Section 8.8.2 of NFPA 13.
NFPA 13 defines a number of different types of storage sprinkler configurations and protection criteria. Fire protection systems that provide fire protection for commodities stored in storage racks conventionally s include sprinklers that are arranged within the storage racks, i.e., in-rack sprinklers, that may be disposed directly above the commodity stored on a shelf of the storage rack. Section 8.13 of NFPA 13 specifies installation requirements for in-rack sprinklers and section 8.13.2.2 of NFPA 13 requires that in-rack sprinklers be ordinary-temperature, standard response or quick response sprinklers and have a nominal K-factor of 5.6 or 8.0 gpm/(psi)1/2.
Chapter 13 of NFPA 13 describes in-rack sprinkler configurations for various classifications of commodities for storage heights up to 12 feet (3.66 meters). According to section 13.3.2 of NFPA (2007 Edition), in-rack sprinklers shall have a K-factor of 5.6 gpm/(psi)1/2 or greater, and shall operate at a minimum of 15 psi (1 bar). Table 13.2.1 and FIG. 13.2.1 of NFPA 13, Chapter 13 specify the maximum ceiling height, maximum storage height, area of sprinkler operation, and discharge density for various hazard classes and storage types for in-rack sprinkler installations for storage up to 12 feet (3.66 meters) in height. Section 16.2 of NFPA 13 provides “Protection Criteria for Rack Storage of Class I Through Class IV Commodities Stored Up to and Including 25 ft in Height,” Section 16.3 provides “Protection Criteria for Rack Storage of Class I Through Class IV Commodities Stored Over 25 ft in Height,” and Chapter 17 provides “Protection of Plastic and Rubber Commodities That are Stored on Racks.”
Fire protection of rack storage configurations poses a number of challenges. Fire sprinkler systems are usually required to be installed in warehouses and other similar article storage areas. Conventional sprinkler systems are generally installed in the ceiling of the building and the sprinklers spray water in the area of the fire to either control and/or to extinguish the fire. In storage areas including racks, however, a fire that starts on a lower rack is shielded from the spray emanating from a sprinkler positioned above the rack, either by shelving above the rack or by commodities stored above the rack. This factor is significantly aggravated as the number of shelves is increased. Moreover, in cases in which sprinklers are located in the ceiling above a given rack, a fire in lower shelves of the rack may not actuate the heating-actuated sensing elements of the sprinklers in a sufficiently short amount of time to provide effective control of the fire. And, as noted, even when the sprinklers of the fire sprinkler system are actuated, the fire on the lower shelves is protected from the spray by upper shelves, and thus, the fire can spread upwardly.
In particular, early suppression-fast response (ESFR) sprinklers and control mode special application (CMSA) sprinklers have been used as ceiling level sprinklers in place of in-rack sprinklers. Conventional ESFR and CMSA sprinklers must operate at a relatively high pressure and discharge relatively large volumes of water in order to provide the same level of fire protection as the in-rack sprinklers they replace. The increased water demand and higher operating pressure required by ESFR and CMSA sprinklers, however, are generally undesirable consequences. Moreover, ESFR and CMSA sprinklers are not approved for the protection of all storage commodities and commodity storage configurations. Furthermore, ESFR and CMSA sprinklers are limited for use based on building heights.
Overhead or roof sprinkler systems supplemented by intermediate levels of sprinklers have been suggested, including, for example, sprinklers mounted within the storage racks, and also within aisles between racks (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 3,732,930 (D'Anneo)). This arrangement was not generally satisfactory because consistent, timely, and dependable detection and sprinkler actuation was not achievable. Consequently, greater damage to stored material, and greater risk to the stored commodity and the building structure, prevented widespread use of this arrangement in high storage facilities. Moreover, installing sprinklers within storage racks increases the cost and complexity of the sprinkler system, and reduces the flexibility of locating and relocating storage racks due to the fixed positions of the sprinkler plumbing. Also, because commodities may be routinely moved in and out of the storage racks, there is an increased risk of damage to the in-rack sprinklers from such handling of the commodities.
Also, fire protection systems using foam have been suggested for use in high-rise storage facilities. Generally, such a system has a foam generator coupled with a suitable sensing system that is capable of filling an entire building volume with a light foam. Single generators capable of producing as much as 2,000 cubic feet per minute (56.63 cubic meters per minute) of foam are available. The time required for filling the building varies, but generally ranges from two to eight minutes. Such systems are not completely satisfactory because the foam may damage goods (i.e., commodities) stored within the facility. Also, when the fire occurs at a high elevation, the foam may not reach the height where the fire is located for some time, permitting the fire to spread to the roof or ceiling and become out-of-control. Further, the foam system mentioned in the D'Anneo patent is relatively expensive, requires great quantities of water, and requires a good deal of maintenance, and the generators, which are heavy and are normally mounted on the roof, may result in structural damage if insufficient reinforcement is provided. In addition, removal of the foam from the warehouse after the fire is extinguished is a problem.
A fire protection system is provided that addresses the deficiencies of conventional in-rack and ceiling fire protection systems, and combinations of the two. In one aspect, the invention provides a fire protection system that uses rack-level sprinklers for fire protection for commodities stored in racks. A fire protection sprinkler system is provided for the protection of commodities including Class I-IV hazards, Group A cartoned and exposed plastics (expanded and unexpanded), flammable liquids, tires, roll paper, and aerosols, stored in a plurality of adjoining racks having a longitudinal flue space between the racks. The system includes a fluid supply conduit that receives a fire protection fluid from a fire protection fluid source, one or more solid horizontal barriers covering (i) a rack, of the plurality of adjoining racks, and (ii) the vertical flue space, the one or more solid horizontal barriers being provided at a predetermined height, and having a width that is at least equal to a width of the rack, of the plurality of adjoining racks, and a depth that is at least equal to a sum of a depth of the rack and a depth of the vertical flue space, and one or more rack-level fire protection sprinklers that are connected to the fluid supply conduit, the one or more rack-level sprinklers being disposed in the vertical flue space above or below a solid horizontal barrier, of the one or more solid horizontal barriers, and each of the one or more rack-level sprinklers being vertically spaced from the commodities stored on a rack, of the plurality of adjoining racks, that is covered by the solid horizontal barrier.
Reference numerals that are the same, but that appear in different figures, represent the same elements, even if those elements are not described with respect to each figure.
As used in this detailed description, the term “rack-level” denotes a position within the longitudinal flue space between rows of adjoining racks between a floor and a top of the racks, but not disposed in a rack. Moreover, as used in this detailed description, the term “ceiling-level” denotes a position between the top of the racks and a ceiling of a building.
A fire protection system for single, double, and multiple row rack storage and racks for automatic rack systems is provided that includes at least one rack-level sprinkler fluidly coupled to a fluid supply conduit. In one embodiment, the rack-level sprinkler is constructed as an extended coverage storage sprinkler. For example, the extended coverage storage sprinkler used as the rack-level sprinkler is a model N252 EC fire sprinkler, manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. (Liberty, S.C.). The N252 EC fire sprinkler has a relatively wide water distribution pattern of up to 196 square feet, and produces a large droplet size. The N252 EC fire sprinkler is capable of pre-wetting areas (surrounding a fire) that have not yet combusted, so as to contain the spread of the fire to adjacent areas. In at least one embodiment in which extended coverage storage sprinklers are employed as rack-level sprinklers, it is possible to eliminate using fire sprinklers in the transverse flue space and to reduce the overall number of rack-level sprinklers.
As shown in
Palletized commodities 102 are stacked in each level of the racks 108. The commodities 102 stored in the racks 108 may include one or more of Class I-IV hazards, Group A cartoned and exposed plastics (expanded and unexpanded), flammable liquids, tires, roll paper, and aerosols, as defined in NFPA 13. In the example shown in
The solid horizontal barrier 142 may extend horizontally across the racks 108 and may extend fully or partially into the vertical flue space 114 above the rack-level sprinklers 144 in between the rear faces 150 of both racks 108, as shown in
As a substitute for solid horizontal barriers 142, either in the racks 108 and/or in the vertical flue spaces 114, horizontal barriers having one or more openings may be employed. For example, the horizontal barriers may be constructed as sheets with one or more apertures.
Also, in at least one embodiment, a separate horizontal barrier (not shown) may be positioned over each rack-level sprinkler 144 in the vertical flue space 114 to collect heat around a thermally responsive element that activates each rack-level sprinkler 144. The separate horizontal barrier can be constructed of a solid material, such as one or more pieces of metal, wood, or non-combustible materials, as defined in NFPA 13. The separate horizontal barrier may be a continuous piece that extends to cover a plurality of rack-level sprinklers 144 that are connected along the length of the supply conduit 116. The separate horizontal barrier may be constructed with or without openings between the horizontally adjacent rack-level sprinklers 144. Alternatively, each rack-level sprinkler 144 may be covered separately by a corresponding horizontal barrier (not shown) that covers a single rack-level sprinkler 144. Such a single-sprinkler horizontal barrier may be smaller to cover individual rack-level sprinklers 144 so that there are horizontal spaces between adjacent horizontal barriers. For structural support and positioning, the horizontal barriers may be attached to the rack-level sprinklers 144, to supporting supply conduit piping 116, or to the racks 108.
Vertical barriers may also be used to control the spread of heat and fire horizontally within and between the racks 108, and to facilitate the transmission of heat vertically toward the rack-level sprinklers 144. Such vertical barriers can compartmentalize the storage areas occupied by the commodities 102 into fire zones that are protected by rack-level sprinklers 144 associated with that fire zone. The vertical barriers may be formed of solid materials, such as metal and wood, or non-combustible materials as defined in NFPA 13. The vertical barriers may be used with or without solid horizontal barriers 142.
In one embodiment, horizontal and vertical barriers are not employed. When such barriers are not employed, the rack-level sprinklers 144 used are selected to have a sufficient thermal sensitivity and release timing so that the rack-level sprinklers 144 are activated.
As shown in
In
The arrangement of rack-level sprinklers 144 used concurrently with ceiling-level sprinklers 146, in accordance with the invention described herein, permits such an arrangement to be used to protect Class I-IV hazards, Group A cartoned and exposed plastics (expanded and unexpanded), flammable liquids, tires, roll paper, and aerosols stored in racks in occupancies having ceilings 147 of any height, including those having ceiling heights above 45 feet (13.72 meters).
The ceiling-level sprinklers 146 may be any storage sprinkler having a K-factor of about 11.2 gpm/(psi)1/2 or greater. The ceiling-level sprinklers 146 may also be an extended coverage control mode special application (EC CMSA), a special application, an extended coverage (EC), a storage, an extended coverage storage, or an early suppression fast response (ESFR) sprinkler. Also, in at least one embodiment, the ceiling-level sprinklers 146 can be the same type of sprinkler as the rack-level sprinklers 144. For example, in one embodiment of a sprinkler system, the ceiling-level sprinklers 146 and the rack-level sprinklers 144 are all model N252 EC sprinklers, manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. of Liberty, S.C. The ceiling-level sprinklers 146 are spaced from each other on a ceiling-level branch line conduit 154 at a spacing of about 8 to 20 feet (2.44 to 6.10 meters). The clearance between the ceiling-level sprinklers 146 and the racks 108, and the clearance between the ceiling-level sprinklers 146 and the commodities 102 stored in the racks 106 below the ceiling-level sprinklers 146, are determined based on the relevant agency approval listing for those ceiling-level sprinklers 146. Since rack-level sprinklers 144 below the solid horizontal barriers 142 (or the rack-level sprinklers 144 in cases when solid horizontal barriers are not used) are expected to operate in the event of a fire condition occurring below the solid horizontal barriers 142 (or rack-level sprinklers 144), the total hydraulic demands of the system may be reduced.
The rack-level sprinklers 144 have a K-factor that is between about 11.2 and 30 gpm/(psi)1/2. In one embodiment, all of the rack-level sprinklers 144 have the same K-factor. In another embodiment, however, not all of the rack-level sprinklers 144 have the same K-factor. For example, in one embodiment, the K-factor of the rack-level sprinklers 144 may depend on the vertical position of the rack-level sprinkler 144 in the racks 108, such that rack-level sprinklers 144 located at higher positions in the racks 108 have a greater K-factor than rack-level sprinklers 144 located at lower positions in the racks 108, or vice versa. Alternatively, rack-level sprinklers 144 having a higher K-factor may be positioned in the rack 108 closer to fire zones in which more severe hazards are stored. In the case of a rack-level sprinkler 144 constructed as an N252 EC sprinkler, the rack-level sprinklers 144 operate at a minimum pressure of about 7 psig (48.26 kPa) and discharge water at a rate of at least about 67 gpm (253.62 liters per minute). For rack-level sprinklers 144 having a lesser or greater K-factor, the sprinklers 144 will operate at a pressure of at least 7 psig (48.26 kPa). The minimum pressure is based on the commodity 102 being protected and the vertical spacing between the solid horizontal barriers 142, or, in a case in which the solid horizontal barriers 142 are not used, the minimum pressure may be based on the vertical spacing between vertically adjacent rack-level sprinklers 144.
As shown in
The rack-level sprinklers 144 can be of the pendent, upright, horizontal sidewall, vertical sidewall, and conventional types (can be oriented in either a pendent or upright position). In addition, the rack-level sprinklers 144 can be constructed having ordinary, intermediate, or high thermal sensitivity (i.e., response time index, or RTI). The rack-level sprinklers 144 may be arranged with a water shield, constructed like the water shields used with model F1 and F1FR intermediate level sprinklers manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. of Liberty, S.C. Also, the rack-level sprinklers 144 may be arranged with a guard, such as sprinkler guards for Model C sprinklers manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. of Liberty, S.C. The rack-level sprinklers 144 may also be constructed with a thermal release element (i.e., a thermally responsive element) that is a bulb or a solder element. In at least one alternate arrangement, the rack-level sprinklers 144 are not arranged in an upright orientation and/or are not constructed as upright sprinklers.
The volume between the solid horizontal barriers (floor 145, 142 and 149), or between vertically adjacent rack-level sprinklers 144 in arrangements without the solid horizontal barriers, can be considered compartments. Such compartments may be further subdivided into a plurality of fire areas associated with each rack-level sprinkler 144. The hydraulic demand for the racks 108 and 109 is determined by the most demanding fire area or the most demanding ceiling-level sprinkler 146. Thus, as a result of the arrangement of fire areas within the racks 108 and 109 and separate ceiling-level sprinkler 146 arrangement, the hydraulic demand of the rack-level sprinklers 144 may or may not be added to the hydraulic demand of the ceiling-level sprinklers 146.
The arrangement of rack-level sprinklers 144 and ceiling-level sprinklers 146, as described herein, provides a number of advantages over approaches to protection for rack storage described in the prior art. For example, the plurality of fire areas protected by rack-level sprinklers 144 eliminates the conventional requirements for ceiling-level sprinklers 146 to penetrate a deeply-rooted, floor-level fire. Instead, as described in accordance with an aspect of the invention, fire protection rack-level sprinklers 144 and ceiling-level sprinklers 146 are positioned closer to the origin of a fire to contain the spread of fire. Moreover, sprinklers are not required to be placed in transverse flue spaces 112 or at the faces 150 of racks 108 and 109, thereby improving access to the storage locations and reducing the chance of damaging the sprinklers during movement of commodities in and out of the racks. Instead, as described in accordance with an aspect of the invention, sprinklers that have a relatively large K-factor and are capable of producing large droplet sizes, can be positioned in the vertical flue space 114 closer to the potential fire locations, which can reduce the number of sprinkler heads opened during a fire and, therefore, reduce the amount of water typically required as compared with the ceiling-based sprinkler systems.
Fire testing has been conducted for a fire protection system 800 arranged in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
The racks 808 and 809 are double-row racks in which exposed, expanded Group A plastic placed on 2-way entry, hardwood stringer pallets 804 are stored.
The ceiling-level sprinklers 846 are fluidly connected to a conduit 854, so that the deflectors of the ceiling-level sprinklers 846 are spaced about 14 inches (355.6 millimeters) from the ceiling 847. The horizontal spacing between the ceiling-level sprinklers 846 is about 10 feet (3.05 meters) along the width of the main array 801. The ceiling-level sprinklers 846 are spaced about 10 feet (3.05 meters) on either side of the midpoint of the width of the main array 801, as shown in
The rack-level sprinklers 844 are fluidly coupled to a 3-inch (76.2 millimeters), schedule 40 branch line conduit 816 that is hydraulically separate from the conduit 854 serving the ceiling-level sprinklers 846. The rack-level sprinklers 844 are extended coverage (EC) type sprinklers oriented in a pendent configuration and having a K-factor of 25.2 gpm/(psi)1/2. The deflectors of the rack-level sprinklers 844 are spaced about 9.5 inches (241.3 millimeters) from the top of the commodity 802 directly below the rack-level sprinklers 844. The response type of the rack-level sprinklers 844 is a quick response (QR) and the thermal release element is a fusible solder link type. The nominal discharge pressure is 30 psig (206.84 kPa) and the nominal discharge flow rate is 138 gpm (522.39 liters per minute).
Conventional in-rack sprinkler systems are designed such that, in the event of a fire, up to eight sprinkler heads may operate. The sprinkler system described in accordance with the invention is constructed to reduce the number of opened sprinkler heads to five or fewer, which reduces the hydraulic demand on the system in the event of a fire. While the system described herein can be constructed for a new rack storage installation, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system can be implemented to retrofit existing sprinkler systems for rack storage by incorporating rack-level sprinklers into an existing rack storage sprinkler system.
Fire testing has been conducted for a fire protection system 900 arranged in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The details of the testing and the arrangement of the system are summarized in Table 2, below.
As distinguished from system 800, system 900 employs extended coverage fire sprinklers for the ceiling-level sprinklers. The ceiling-level sprinklers used in the system 900 have a nominal K-factor of 25.2 and are constructed as Model N252 EC sprinklers manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc., of Liberty, S.C. The rack-level sprinklers used in the system 900 are the same as the ceiling-level sprinklers. The results of the test of the system 900 are noted in Table 2.
Fire testing has been conducted for a fire protection system 1000 arranged in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The details of the testing and the arrangement of the system are summarized in Table 3, below.
As distinguished from the testing of the system 800 and the system 900, the system 1000 was tested in a main array and two other arrays having two solid horizontal barriers, a lower barrier at a 20 foot (6.10 meter) elevation, and an upper barrier at a 40 foot (12.19 meter) elevation. Also, distinguished from testing of the system 800 and the system 900, in the test arrangement of the system 1000, the aisle width between the main array and the other two arrays was four feet (1.22 meters) instead of eight feet (2.44 meters), as in the test arrangement of the systems 800 and 900. The test arrangement used to test the system 1000 employs extended coverage fire sprinklers for the ceiling-level and rack-level sprinklers. The ceiling-level and rack-level sprinklers used in the system 1000 have a nominal K-factor of 25.2 gpm/(psi)1/2 and are constructed as Model N252 EC sprinklers manufactured by The Reliable Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc., of Liberty, S.C. The results of the test of system the 1000 are noted in Table 3.
While the present disclosure has been described with respect to what are, at present, considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/054213 | 8/8/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/026049 | 2/13/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3520345 | Lillibridge et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3539108 | Lillibridge | Nov 1970 | A |
3732930 | D'Anneo | May 1973 | A |
3738429 | Heller et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3802574 | Weider | Apr 1974 | A |
4178994 | Ito et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4418757 | Merkel | Dec 1983 | A |
5368174 | Clark et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5386917 | Clark et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5915479 | Ponte | Jun 1999 | A |
7165624 | Fischer | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7793736 | Golinveaux et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7798239 | Golinveaux et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8408321 | Golinveaux et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
RE44404 | Golinveaux et al. | Aug 2013 | E |
8733461 | Pigeon | May 2014 | B2 |
9050481 | Fenton et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9498787 | Fenton et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20100132962 | Silva, Jr. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110017476 | Fuchs | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036598 | Pahila | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20150352385 | Fenton et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101553285 | Oct 2009 | CN |
101951993 | Jan 2011 | CN |
200920441 | May 2009 | TW |
WO 2008145809 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2011116012 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Taiwan Official Action dated Jun. 28, 2017, issued in corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 102128646, with an English translation. |
Office Action and Search report dated May 22, 2018, issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 102128646. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150027739 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61681999 | Aug 2012 | US | |
61709714 | Oct 2012 | US |