1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to cathode assemblies for use in Hall-Heroult aluminum reduction cells, more particularly, to cathode assemblies having a plurality of interlocking wettable ceramic tiles covering the cathode blocks.
2. Prior Art
Aluminum is commonly manufactured by a smelting process in an electrolytic cell of the established Hall-Heroult design. A conventional Hall-Heroult electrolytic cell includes a cell defining a chamber housing carbonaceous anodes. The anodes are suspended in a bath of electrolytic fluid containing alumina and other materials. Electric current is supplied to the anodes to provide a source of electrons for reducing alumina to aluminum that accumulates as a molten aluminum pad. The molten aluminum pad forms a liquid metal cathode. A cathode assembly is positioned in the bottom of the chamber and completes the cathodic portion of the cell. The cathode assembly includes cathode blocks having an upper surface, which supports the molten aluminum pad. Collector bars are received within a lower portion of the cathode blocks and are connected via a bus bar to a current supply in a conventional manner to complete the circuit.
These electrolytic cells are typically operated at high temperatures (about 940 to 980° C.) which, when combined with the corrosive nature of electrolytes creates a harsh environment. Cathode blocks have historically been formed from a mixture of anthrocite and pitch binder and exhibit relatively high electrical resistivity, high sodium swelling, low thermal shock resistance, and high abrasion resistance. As aluminum producers seek to increase productivity, the operating amperages for such cells have been increased. Hence the need for reduced power losses in the smelting process has increased. One limitation in the operation of an electrolytic cell is the distance between the lower surface of the anode and the upper surface of the liquid metal cathode. Conventionally, this distance has been about 4 to about 5 centimeters. It is well-established that substantial savings in the electrical energy required for the operation of the cell could be achieved by reducing the distance between the anode and the cathode. Reduction of the anode to cathode distance in conventional electrolytic reduction cells has been limited by the strong magnetic forces in the horizontal plane as a result of the interaction of horizontal current components in the molten metal with strong magnetic fields existing within the cell. The magnetic forces acting on the molten metal lead to an intermittent shorting between the anodes and the molten metal cathode when the anode to cathode distance is reduced below the conventional 4 to 5 cm.
More recently, it has been recognized that these difficulties may be obviated by covering the cathode block with individual packing elements with a surface which is resistant to attack but yet is wettable by the molten metal, but not wettable by the molten electrolyte thereby using the interfacial tension forces of the molten metal/electrolyte interface to restrain entry of the molten electrolyte into the bed of packing elements. Such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,443,313, incorporated herein by reference, which discloses a tightly packed monolayer of loose elements formed from materials, such as TiB2, in various geometric shapes. A significant drawback to the system disclosed therein is the moveability of the packing elements, particularly in the vertical direction.
Accordingly, a need remains for an electrolytic cell which may be operated with a reduced anode/cathode distance by including a surface on the cathode block which is wettable by the molten metal yet is not subject to shifting during operation of the cell.
This need is met by the interlocking cathode tiles of the present invention. The interlocking cathode tiles of the present invention are positioned on the cathode block and include vertical restraining members. The vertical restraining member includes an upper tab extending from a body of one tile and a lower tab extending from a body of another tile such that the lower tab is restrained from vertical movement by the upper tab of an adjoining tile. Each tile may comprise an upper tab and a lower tab on different locations of the tile. The tile may be polygonal, such as hexagonal, with upper tabs extending from a plurality of sides of the main body and lower tiles extending from other sides of the main body. The tile may be manufactured from a ceramic material, such as TiB2—C, which may contain about 95 wt. % TiB2 and about 5 wt. % C.
In use in an electrolytic cell, the main bodies are spaced apart by about {fraction (1/16)} to about =b {fraction (3/16)} inch. This system allows for the cathode block to be spaced about 1 inch from the anode. The upper surface of the interlocking tiles may be horizontal or up to about 5° from horizontal.
The electrolytic cell may further define a sump for receiving molten aluminum. The sump is positioned adjacent to an edge of the surface of interlocking tiles. A plurality of retaining tiles may be positioned between the edge of the layer of interlocking tiles and the sump to retain the interlocking tiles in position. The retaining tiles each may be a planar tile positioned substantially vertically with one end fixed within the cathode block. Alternatively, the retaining tiles may be L-shaped with a pair of legs, one leg fixed into the cathode block with the other leg extending towards the sump.
A complete understanding of the invention will be obtained from the following description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawing figures wherein like reference characters identify like parts throughout.
For purposes of the description hereinafter, the terms “upper”, “lower”, “right”, “left”, “vertical”, “horizontal”, “top”, “bottom” and derivatives thereof shall relate to the invention as it is oriented in the drawing figures. However, it is to be understood that the invention may assume various alternative variations and step sequences, except where expressly specified to the contrary. It is also to be understood that the specific devices and processes illustrated in the attached drawings, and described in the following specification, are simply exemplary embodiments of the invention. Hence, specific dimensions and other physical characteristics related to the embodiments disclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting.
The tiles are formed from a wettable ceramic material, such as TiB2—C, and may include about 95 wt. % TiB2 and about 5 wt. % C. The layer 14 of interlocking tiles 16 shown in
In order to prevent movement of the interlocking tiles 16 towards the sump 28, particularly when the layer 4 is at an angle from horizontal, the cell 2 may include a plurality of retaining tiles 30 as shown in
It has been found that a pilot scale 23 kA Hall-Heroult cell operated for a period of sixty days has a high current efficiency (93%) at a cell voltage of 4.1 to 4.3 with an anode to cathode distance of about 1 inch when using the tiles 16 of the present invention. The energy consumption has been shown to be reduced from the conventional consumption of comparable Hall-Heroult cell by about 10%, to 6.25 kWh/lb of aluminum. It is expected that similar energy savings are obtainable in a 70 kA cell.
It will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the concepts disclosed in the foregoing description. Such modifications are to be considered as included within the following claims unless the claims, by their language, expressly state otherwise. Accordingly, the particular embodiments described in detail herein are illustrative only and are not limiting to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.
The subject matter of this application was made with United States Government support under Contract No. DE-FC07-97ID13567 awarded by the Department of Energy. The United States Government has certain rights to this invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3400061 | Lewis et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
| 4073318 | Close et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4093524 | Payne | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4231853 | Rahn | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4243502 | Kugler | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4439382 | Joó et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4443313 | Gesing et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4544524 | Mizrah et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4592820 | McGeer | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4650552 | de Nora et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4722280 | Sanai | Feb 1988 | A |
| 5028301 | Townsend | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5320717 | Sekhar | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5470140 | Schagunn | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5630304 | Austin | May 1997 | A |
| 5743059 | Fifield | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746895 | Sekhar | May 1998 | A |
| 5876584 | Cortellini | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5938914 | Dawless et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6103091 | Sekhar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-27615 | Oct 2000 | AU |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040016639 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |