Electronic distribution of information has gained importance with the proliferation of personal computers and wide area networks such as the Internet. With the widespread use of the Internet, it has become possible to distribute large, coherent units of information, such as books, using electronic technologies. Books distributed using electronic technologies are commonly referred to as electronic books (“eBooks”). Various entities make eBooks available for download over ordinary Internet connections, such as broadband and dialup connections.
Typically, digital works are structured as virtual frames presented on a display device, and a user may turn or change from one virtual frame or “page” of electronic content to another. The term “page” as used herein refers to a collection of content that is presented at one time on a display. Thus, “pages” as described herein are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in display conditions, such as screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, or the like.
EBooks may be displayed and read on a variety of different display devices, such as computer monitors, portable digital assistants (PDAs), pocket personal computers (PCs), and specialized eBook reader devices, for example. The screen size of the various display options may vary greatly from one display device to another. For example, a computer monitor may have a screen size of twenty-one inches (measured diagonally) or more, while a pocket PC may have a screen size as small as a few inches. Simply by virtue of the larger screen size, more content can be displayed on the computer monitor at one time than on the pocket PC. Thus, content that appears on a certain page (e.g., page 10) of an eBook when displayed on a computer monitor may appear on a much later page (i.e., page 50) when displayed on a pocket PC or some other display device having a smaller screen size.
Font type also affects how much textual content can displayed on a display screen. Different fonts may have a different number of characters per inch and may have uniform or variable character widths. Perhaps more significantly, the size of the font also affects the amount of content displayed on a display screen. Generally, the smaller the font size, the more text that will fit on the display screen, and vice versa.
These and other display conditions (e.g., screen resolution, margins, line spacing, etc.) affect the amount of content that can be displayed on a given display screen. Accordingly, it may be difficult or impossible for a user reading an eBook on one display device to meaningfully communicate a page cite to a reader of the same eBook on another display device, because one or more of the foregoing display conditions may be different. For example, when a reader cites a meaningful quotation on page 27, line 3, this citation is likely to not be accurate for most other readers.
Another problem may arise when a user is in the middle of reading an eBook and decides to change the font type, font size, margins, or some other display condition. In that case, the user probably knows what page he or she was reading prior to the change in display condition. However, after the change, the content the user was previously reading will likely be found on a different page of the eBook, and the user may not be able to easily locate the place where he or she left off.
Thus, there remains a need to improve a method of identifying or referencing material within electronic content to improve a reader's ability to navigate within an eBook and to better identify a location within the eBook content.
In view of the above, this disclosure describes ways of invariantly referencing locations within an electronic book, electronic content, or other digital work regardless of screen size, font size, or other variations in display of the digital work. In one aspect, a method of presenting a digital work includes displaying a portion of the digital work on a display screen under a set of display conditions, and providing one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the portion of the digital work on the display screen. The invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work, and each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed.
In another aspect, a method of indexing a digital work includes partitioning the digital work into a plurality of segments, generating a plurality of location reference identifiers, and sequentially assigning each segment of the digital work a unique location reference identifier. Each location reference identifier is uniquely assigned with a corresponding segment of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the digital work is displayed.
In still another aspect, a data structure of a digital work is stored on one or more computer-readable media. The data structure includes a first data field containing a header identifying content of the data structure, a second data field comprising data representing a digital work including text, and a third data field comprising invariant location reference identifiers. Each invariant location reference identifier is associated with a location in the digital work, such that when the data structure is read by a computer, each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the associated portion of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed by the computer.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
Overview
As mentioned above, a problem arises when attempting to identify and communicate a page or position within a digital work, due to the variable screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, and other variable display conditions of the display devices. This problem arises because the virtual frames or “pages” displayed on the display device are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in the display conditions. This disclosure is directed to invariant referencing of locations within a digital work, which allows a user to accurately reference a location within a digital work, regardless of screen size, font type, font size, or other variations in display conditions of the digital work.
In exemplary implementations described herein, the invariant location referencing is described in the context of an electronic book (“eBook”). The terms “eBook” and “digital work” are used synonymously and, as used herein, may include electronic or digital representations of printed works, as well as original electronic or digital content that may include text, multimedia, hypertext and/or hypermedia. Examples of eBooks and/or digital works include, but are not limited to, books, magazines, newspapers, periodicals, journals, reference materials, telephone books, textbooks, anthologies, instruction manuals, proceedings of meetings, forms, directories, maps, etc. Also, while various aspects and features are described herein as applied to an eBook reader, the concepts may be implemented in other electronic devices or electronic readers besides eBook reader devices including, for example, personal computers, portable computers (e.g., laptops or pocket PCs), personal digital assistants (PDAs), portable gaming devices, wireless phones, and the like.
In the implementation shown in
Also, the invariant location reference identifier 300 is shown in a navigation bar 302 along the bottom of the display screen. However, in other implementations, the invariant location reference identifier 300 may be displayed in other locations on the screen and may be displayed continuously, periodically, and/or upon request of the user. For example, the invariant location reference identifier 300 could be displayed along the top of the display screen, along a side of the display screen, overlaid over content of the eBook, in a drop-down menu, or in any other known user interface or display technique. In another example, invariant location reference identifiers may be displayed upon a user selecting or pointing to a portion of the eBook or a location in the eBook corresponding to the given invariant location reference identifier.
Before discussing these and other invariant location referencing implementations in detail, an exemplary display device will be briefly described to provide context for the invariant location referencing techniques.
As shown in
The first display 406 in the dual display system presents content in a human-readable format to the user. The content presented in the first display 406 may be digital works, such as electronic books, newspapers, or other readable or viewable materials. For example, the display 406 provides the text of the electronic books and also depicts any illustrations, tables, or graphic elements that might be contained in the electronic books.
The second display 408 of the dual display system is a narrow screen located adjacent to the content display 406. The narrow display 408 is illustrated as being positioned to the right of the content display 406, although it may be located elsewhere in the housing 402 in other implementations. The narrow display screen 408 may be responsive to user input registered via, for example, a finger, a stylus, or other similar pointing device. Additionally, the narrow display screen 408 may enable presentation of graphic elements that correspond to content displayed in the content display 406.
The eBook reader device 400 may also include a variety of user inputs 410 to navigate through and among eBooks and digital works. Examples of user inputs that may be present include buttons, scroll wheels, thumb wheels, thumb sticks, sensors that detect and register movement of a user's thumb or finger, tactile sensors, or any other conventional user input mechanism.
The eBook reader device 400 also has various internal components, which are referred to generally as eBook reader subsystems 412. In one implementation, the subsystems 412 include system storage 414 and a processing unit 416. The processing unit 416 interacts with the system storage 414 to facilitate operation of the eBook reader device 400. The system storage 414 may be used to store a plurality of eBooks 418 and other content, as well as software programs or other executable modules 420 that may be executed by the processing unit. Examples of such programs or modules might include indexing modules indexing eBooks with invariant location reference identifiers, reader programs, control modules (e.g., power management), network connection software, operating models, display drivers, sensor algorithms, page turn detectors, and the like.
The system storage 414 may include volatile memory (such as RAM), nonvolatile memory, removable memory, and/or non-removable memory, implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Also, the processing unit 416 may include onboard memory in addition to or instead of the system storage 414. Some examples of storage media that may be included in the system storage 414 and/or processing unit 416 include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the eBook reader device 400. Any such computer storage media may be part of the eBook reader device 400.
Various instructions, methods and techniques described herein may be considered in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. for performing particular tasks or implementing particular abstract data types. These program modules and the like may be executed as native code or may be downloaded and executed, such as in a virtual machine or other just-in-time compilation execution environment. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments. An implementation of these modules and techniques may be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer-readable media.
Overview of Invariant Location Referencing
Invariant location referencing makes it possible to meaningfully identify and communicate a specific location or segment of content in an eBook, regardless of screen size, font type or size, resolution, or other display conditions of the display device. Generally, this is accomplished by assigning unique reference identifiers at locations throughout the content of a digital work, or to individual segments of the digital work. These reference identifiers are not dependent on display conditions of a display device on which the digital work is displayed. In that sense, the reference characters are invariant. The invariant location reference identifiers may be provided in addition to any dividing indicia in the digital work itself (e.g., page numbers, chapter numbers, book numbers, section numbers, etc.) and any virtual (variable) page numbering, or may be provided instead of such dividing indicia and/or virtual page numbering. The invariant location reference identifiers provide a reliable means by which a user can determine a location of content in the digital work and approximately where the content is relative to the beginning and end of the digital work. Invariant location reference identifiers may also be used as a means of identifying a source of a quotation or excerpt from an eBook, or when one eBook references a passage from another eBook (e.g., See Shakespeare, “Romeo and Juliet”, location 2105).
There are numerous ways of providing invariant location reference identifiers in, or in association with, content of a digital work. For example, invariant location reference identifiers may be embedded in, or appended to, a digital work after creation, but prior to distribution to a consumer. This approach is referred to herein as preprocessing. Alternatively, invariant location reference identifiers may be generated and associated with content of a digital work by a display device subsequent to distribution to a consumer and upon loading the digital work. This approach is referred to herein as post-processing. In still other implementations, a byte-count or address of data corresponding to content of the digital work may be used as the invariant location reference identifiers, in which case invariant location reference identifiers need not be specially generated.
At 504, the digital work is partitioned into a plurality of segments. The digital work may be partitioned in numerous different ways. For example, in various implementations, each segment may correspond to an individual character, word, string of words, sentence, paragraph, or any other unit of textual content. Alternatively, each segment may correspond to a predetermined multiple of characters, words, sentences, or paragraphs (e.g., every tenth character, every other word, every fifth sentence, etc.). In still other implementations, the digital work may be partitioned into horizontal and/or vertical bands corresponding to predetermined areas of the original printed work (e.g., each segment may correspond to characters present in a one inch horizontal band of the original printed work). Each of these partitioning techniques will be described in more detail below with reference to
A plurality of sequential, unique location reference identifiers is generated at 506, and, at 508, each segment of the digital work is sequentially assigned a unique location reference identifier. Thus, each location reference identifier is uniquely assigned to a corresponding segment of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the digital work is displayed. In other words, the location reference identifiers are invariant with respect to display conditions.
At 510, the invariant location reference identifiers are embedded, appended, or otherwise associated with locations or segments of the digital work. However, the location reference identifiers remain separate from the digital work in so far as the location reference identifiers are not characters of the digital work itself, but are separate identifiers that are associated with locations or segments of the digital work. Thus, the content of the digital work is unaltered by the provision of the location reference identifiers. Examples of ways in which the location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital work include attaching the location reference identifiers as meta data to the digital work, appending an index file of location reference identifiers to the digital work data file, and maintaining a location reference identifier index file apart from the digital work data file. However, location reference identifiers may also be associated with the digital work in any other known manner.
The digital work itself may or may not include some sort of indexing or dividing indicia of the content, such as page identifiers, chapter identifiers, section identifiers, figure identifiers, table identifiers, or the like. The invariant location references can be, but generally are not, based on any chapters, pages, or other dividing indicia in the body of the digital work. Thus, the location reference identifiers are generally generated independently of any location indicia in the digital work. Nevertheless, in some implementations, the location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital content based at least in part on location indicia in the digital work. In that case, at 512, the digital work may be searched for any dividing indicia in the digital work, and any such dividing indicia found may be replaced or overlaid with a corresponding invariant location reference identifier or a hyperlink to the same. Additionally, at 514, a table of contents may be generated, which references content of the digital work with hyperlinks to location reference identifiers corresponding to locations of the referenced content in the digital work.
Subsequently, at 516, the digital work is distributed to consumers along with the associated invariant location reference identifiers, and, at 518, the digital work may be loaded and displayed on a display device.
It should be understood that certain acts in method 500 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, the act 512 of searching for dividing indicia in the digital work and replacing or overlaying the dividing indicia with invariant location reference identifier and the act 514 of generating a table of contents can be omitted. Also, the order in which the acts of partitioning the digital work 504 and generating invariant location reference identifiers 506 are performed is not important and those acts may be reversed as desired.
In method 600, the digital work is created or captured at 602, the digital work is distributed to consumers at 604, and loaded in memory of a display device at 606. At 608, the digital work is partitioned into segments by a program module in memory of the display device. Partitioning is performed in the same manner as discussed for method 500 above and explained further below with reference to
In some implementations, at 614, the program module of the display device may search the digital work for any dividing indicia in the digital work, and any such dividing indicia found may be replaced or overlaid with a corresponding invariant location reference identifier. Additionally, at 616, the program module of the display device may generate a table of contents, which references content of the digital work with hyperlinks to location reference identifiers corresponding to locations of the referenced content in the digital work. One or more of acts 608-616 may be performed automatically upon loading the digital work for display at 606.
At 618, the digital work is displayed on the display device along with the invariant location reference identifiers.
It should be understood that certain acts in method 600 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, the act 614 of searching for dividing indicia in the digital work and replacing or overlaying the dividing indicia with invariant location reference identifier and the act 616 of generating a table of contents can be omitted. Also, the order in which the acts of partitioning the digital work 608 and generating invariant location reference identifiers 610 are performed is not important and those acts may be reversed as desired.
In the character-based approach 702, the digital work is partitioned such that each character of the digital work is a separate segment. Thus, in the implementation shown, the phrase “But, soft!” is partitioned into ten segments. This approach provides the highest resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires the most processing resources and generates the largest index file of location references.
In the word-based approach 704, the digital work is partitioned such that each word of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, each set of successively arranged characters separated by a space before and a space after will be treated as a word. Thus, in the implementation shown, the phrase “But, soft! What light through yonder window breaks!” is partitioned into eight segments. This approach provides somewhat lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the character-based approach.
In the sentence-based approach 706, the digital work is partitioned such that each sentence of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, any string of characters beginning with the first character of the digital work, the first character following a period, or the first character following a hard return, and ending with a period, question mark, or exclamation point will be treated as a sentence. Thus, the passage shown in this implementation has been partitioned into three segments. This approach provides still lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the word-based approach.
In the paragraph-based approach 708, the digital work is partitioned such that each paragraph of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, any string of characters beginning with the first character of the digital work, the first character following a hard return, and the first character following a tab indention, and ending with a hard return will be treated as a paragraph. Thus, the passage shown in this implementation has been partitioned into three segments. This approach provides still lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the sentence-based approach.
In each of the foregoing character-, word-, sentence-, and paragraph-based approaches, images (e.g., tables, figures, charts, and other non-text subject matter) in a digital work may be treated as a predetermined number of one or more segments, and assigned one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the assigned segments. That is, every image, regardless of display size, resolution, file size, or other display conditions, may be assigned a predetermined number of one or more invariant location reference identifiers. For example, every image in a digital work may be assigned a single invariant location reference identifier, which may be the next sequential invariant location reference identifier following the invariant location reference identifier assigned to text preceding the image. Alternatively, each image may be assigned any other predetermined number of invariant location reference identifiers.
In other implementations, images may be proportionately assigned invariant location reference identifiers, based on the size of data corresponding to the image. That is, an image might be assigned one invariant location reference identifier for each byte (or multiple bytes) of data of the image. In other implementations, images may be treated as if they were one or more words (e.g., all images are treated as one word, or small images are treated as ten words while large images are treated as fifty words). In still other implementations, an image may be assigned a number of invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to an amount of text occupying approximately the same amount of data as the image (e.g., if an image is represented by about the same amount of data as thirty characters, the image will be assigned the same number of invariant location reference identifiers as would thirty characters of text).
The band-based approach 710 may be applied if the digital work is scanned or otherwise captured from a printed document or film. In the band based approach 710, the digital work is partitioned into segments of text corresponding to predetermined areas of the printed document. The bands may be horizontal and/or vertical. In the example shown in
In some implementations, the size of the bands may be based at least in part on the font size, line spacing, or other formatting of the original printed copy of the work. For example, it may be desirable to size the bands such that each band contains a predetermined number of lines of text. This approach tends to standardize the amount of textual content between successive invariant location reference identifiers by standardizing the number of lines of text corresponding to each invariant location reference identifier regardless of font size, line spacing, or other formatting. In an implementation in which the bands are sized to fit a predetermined number of lines, the band size will be larger for printed works having larger font size and/or line spacing. For example, four lines of double spaced text in fourteen point font will occupy a band size of about 1.5 inches, whereas four lines of single spaced text in ten point font will occupy a band size of about 0.75 inches.
The band-based approach 710 is well suited to partitioning digital works that include images, figures, charts, or other non-text objects, since the objects can be partitioned into bands in the same manner as text. In the character-, word-, sentence-, and paragraph-based approaches, such objects are generally treated as a predetermined number of one or more segments (e.g., an object corresponds to one segment, five segments, etc.), regardless of the size or shape of the object.
Each of the foregoing approaches may be done on an individual character-, word-, sentence-, paragraph-, or band-basis as shown in
Some implementations may employ a hybrid or combination of the foregoing partitioning approaches. In that case, the various partitioning approaches may be performed before distribution to consumers (preprocessing), after distribution to consumers (post-processing), or both. For example, in one exemplary implementation, a digital work may be coarsely partitioned using the band-based approach 710 during preprocessing, and then subsequently more finely partitioned (e.g., by a consumer's display device) using the character-based approach 702 or word-based approach 704.
Once a digital work has been indexed (and in some cases even without indexing), the digital work can be presented on a display device along with invariant location reference identifiers.
In the implementation shown, the navigation pane 808 includes a location field 810, showing a current invariant location reference identifier (in this case 2105) relative to the total number of location reference identifiers in the eBook (in this case 9000). The invariant location reference identifier displayed in the location field 810 may be the invariant location reference identifier corresponding to the first content displayed on the display screen (in this case “B,” “But,” “But, Soft,” etc. depending on the how the eBook was partitioned), the last content on the display screen (in this case “r,” “her,” etc.), or some selected content 814 on the display screen (in this case the word “east” is selected). This allows a user to know and communicate precisely where he or she is currently reading in the eBook and where the current location is relative to the beginning and end of the eBook content.
A search field 812 is also provided in the navigation bar 808. A user may enter an invariant location reference identifier in the search field 812 to skip to the corresponding portion of the eBook content.
Each character in a digital work is represented by units of data. Each unit of data corresponds to some portion of the digital work. For example, each byte of data generally corresponds to about one character of the digital work. Accordingly, to determine a location of content within a digital work, it is possible to map the content to a byte of data corresponding to that content and determine the address or byte-count for that byte of data. The address or byte-count can then serve as an invariant location reference identifier for the digital work without any additional indexing. The current address or byte-count can then be provided relative to the total number of bytes in the file underlying the digital work to provide an indication of the current location relative to the beginning and end of the digital work.
In the implementation shown in
In some cases, such as where the digital work includes images in-line with text content, the byte-count may appear to jump at the point where the image is located, since the image may correspond to a significant amount of data. For example, as small image might consume 20,000 bytes or more. To counteract this jumping appearance, the images may be stored at the beginning or end of the text content, and then the images may be referred to from within the text via image pointers of fixed or heuristically chosen byte sizes.
Referring to again to
At 1106, one or more invariant location reference identifiers are displayed which correspond to the portion of the digital work on the display screen. The invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work in the sense that the location reference identifiers are not characters of the digital work itself, but are separate identifiers that are associated with locations or segments of the digital work. Thus, the content of the digital work is unaltered by the provision of the location reference identifiers. The location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital work by attaching the location reference identifiers as meta data to the digital work, appending an index file of location reference identifiers to the digital work data file, maintaining a location reference identifier index file apart from the digital work data file, or in any other known manner. In this manner, each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed.
In some implementations, at 1108, display and reading panes are displayed on the display screen. In that case, the displayed portion of the digital work is displayed in the reading pane and the invariant location reference identifiers are provided in the navigation pane. Additionally or alternatively, at 1110, invariant location reference identifiers may be overlaid on the parts of the digital work with which the invariant location reference identifiers are respectively associated. Also additionally or alternatively, the invariant location reference identifiers are provided in response to user selection of or pointing to a part (e.g., a character, word, sentence, paragraph, object, or other content) of the digital work displayed on the display screen.
In various implementations, the invariant location reference identifiers may correspond to one or more characters, words, sentences, paragraphs, images, figures, bands, or objects of the digital work. The invariant location reference identifiers may include any combination of letters, numbers, punctuation, symbols, or other characters. For ease of use, it may be desirable that the invariant location reference identifiers are numerals and/or include an easily manageable number of characters (e.g., at most four characters). Also, the invariant location reference identifiers may, but need not, include a decimal point, comma, colon, or other punctuation (e.g., 210.5 or 2,105 or 2:1:05) to assist a user in navigating the digital work.
However, invariant location reference identifiers having any number of digits and/or characters may be used. For example, more digits or characters may be desirable in cases using a partitioning approach to partition a work into having more than 9999 segments (e.g., a work partitioned using the character-based approach and having more than 9999 characters, or a work partitioned using the byte-based approach and having more than 9999 bytes). Additionally or alternatively, works having more segments could be scaled down to a desired number of digits (e.g., by truncating the actual number of invariant location reference identifiers—123,456 truncated to 1,234, dividing by a predetermined factor determined factor, dividing by a factor heuristically determined on a per-title basis to optimize display, etc.).
It may be desirable in some instances to assign each invariant location reference identifier to a substantially uniform amount of content. Thus, in some implementations, shorter works may have fewer invariant location reference identifiers than longer works. However, in other implementations, digital works may have a standard number of invariant location reference identifiers (e.g., 9999). Regardless of the nature and length of the invariant location reference identifiers displayed, it may be possible in some implementations to allow for more specific or precise referencing within the digital work. For example, referring back to
In the hidden precision approach, the digital work is partitioned into a larger number of segments than are displayed (e.g., work is partitioned into 999,999 segments, but the work is displayed as having 9,999 invariant location reference identifiers). Thus, a user is able to search within the additional two decimal places that are hidden and not displayed. In the interpolation approach, the work is partitioned into the same number of segments as displayed invariant location reference identifiers (e.g., 9,999), and the approximate location within the segment is determined as a percentage of the additional places of precision (e.g., 2105.25 is 25% of the way between segments 2105 and 2106). Thus, applying the interpolation approach to the example of
In some implementations, the method 1100 may further include, at 1112, presenting a search field for entry of an invariant location reference identifier and, in response to user entry of the invariant location reference identifier in the search field, updating the display screen to display a portion of the digital work corresponding to the entered invariant location reference identifier. Also in some implementations, the method 1100 may include, at 1114, providing a table of contents referencing content of the digital work based on corresponding invariant location reference identifiers.
It should be understood that certain acts in method 1100 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, any one or more of acts 1106-1114 may be omitted.
Moreover, any of the acts of any of the methods described herein may be implemented by a processor or other computing device based on instructions stored on one or more computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a preprocessing system, display device, and/or digital work, as appropriate. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by the preprocessing system, display device, and/or digital work. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
Data Structure of eBook
The location reference field 1206 may include a variety of other information regarding the invariant location reference identifiers and how they are indexed with respect to the digital work, such as, for example, a table of contents, a list of hyperlinks or pointers to various locations within the digital work, a list of byte-counts or addresses in the underlying file of the digital work, and/or any other information about how the digital work is indexed.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claims. For example, the methodological acts need not be performed in the order or combinations described herein, and may be performed in any combination of one or more acts.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/693,677 filed Mar. 29, 2007 and titled “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional application 60/882,870 filed Dec. 29, 2006, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2684955 | Knowles | Sep 1954 | A |
| 4622627 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4985697 | Boulton | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5418549 | Anderson et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5495268 | Pearson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5499359 | Vijaykumar | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5517407 | Weiner | May 1996 | A |
| 5544305 | Ohmaye et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5566098 | Lucente et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5600775 | King et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5623260 | Jones | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5630159 | Zancho | May 1997 | A |
| 5640553 | Schultz | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5659742 | Beattie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5661635 | Huffman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663748 | Huffman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5696982 | Tanigawa et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5710922 | Alley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711922 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5742905 | Pepe et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5761485 | Munyan | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5765168 | Burrows | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774109 | Winksy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5845278 | Kirsch et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5845301 | Rivette et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5847698 | Reavey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5923861 | Bertram et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5940846 | Akiyama | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956048 | Gaston | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5973681 | Tanigawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5991439 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6018575 | Gross et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6034839 | Hamming | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6037954 | McMahon | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041335 | Merritt et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047189 | Yun et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049796 | Siitonen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6064980 | Jacobi et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6073148 | Rowe et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6113394 | Edgar | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6148340 | Bittinger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154757 | Krause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6164974 | Carlile et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6195698 | Lillibridge et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201771 | Otsuka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6226642 | Beranek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233318 | Picard et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6272461 | Meredith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6300947 | Kanevsky | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308320 | Burch | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6313828 | Chombo | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6331866 | Eisenberg | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6331867 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335678 | Heutschi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6351750 | Duga et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6385596 | Wiser et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6401086 | Bruckner | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6401239 | Miron | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6442651 | Crow et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6449627 | Baer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6457030 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6466951 | Birkler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6484212 | Markowitz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487669 | Waring | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493734 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6496803 | Seet et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6529920 | Arons et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535857 | Clarke, III et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542874 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559882 | Kerchner | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6560699 | Konkle | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574658 | Gabber et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6629138 | Lambert et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631495 | Kato et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6642947 | Feierbach | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6685482 | Hopp et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6687878 | Eintracht et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704733 | Clark et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721869 | Senthil | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6724403 | Santoro et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6725227 | Li | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6726487 | Dalstrom | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6735583 | Bjarnestam et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6744891 | Allen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6744967 | Kaminski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6801751 | Wood et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6803930 | Simonson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6804489 | Stuppy et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6829594 | Kitamura | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6847966 | Sommer et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6904449 | Quinones | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6912398 | Domnitz | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6933928 | Lilienthal | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6938076 | Meyer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6947922 | Glance | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6948135 | Ruthfield et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6953343 | Townshend | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6966029 | Ahern | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6980652 | Braitberg et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6985932 | Glaser et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6992687 | Baird et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6999565 | Delaney et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7007015 | Nayak | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7009596 | Seet et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7010500 | Aarnio | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7010751 | Shneiderman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020654 | Najmi | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7020663 | Hay et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7054914 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057591 | Hautanen et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7062707 | Knauft et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7071930 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089292 | Roderick et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7092116 | Calaway | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103848 | Barsness et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107533 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7111250 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7130841 | Goel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7133506 | Smith | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7135932 | Quadir et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7149776 | Roy et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7165217 | Kondo | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7181502 | Incertis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188085 | Pelletier | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191346 | Abe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7209888 | Frid-Nielsen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7237123 | LeVine et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7246118 | Chastain et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249046 | Katsurabayashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7249060 | Ling | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7249324 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7257577 | Fagin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7287068 | Eriksson et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7290285 | McCurdy et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7298851 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7304635 | Seet et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310629 | Mendelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7313759 | Sinisi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7350704 | Barsness et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7355591 | Sugimoto | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7375649 | Gueziec | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7383505 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386480 | Sarig | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7386804 | Ho et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7398244 | Keith | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7401286 | Hendricks et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7454238 | Vinayak et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7461406 | Pelly et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7496767 | Evans | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7506246 | Hollander et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506356 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7509270 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7519278 | Ikeda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7533152 | Stark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7539478 | Herley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7562032 | Abbosh et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7562038 | Brumfield et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7574653 | Croney et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7631013 | Parsons et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634429 | Narin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7656127 | Shutt et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
| 7657459 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657831 | Donahue | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7680849 | Heller et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7716224 | Reztlaff, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720892 | Healey et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7747949 | Incertis Carro | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7760986 | Beuque | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7788369 | McAllen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7792756 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7835989 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7849393 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7865405 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7865567 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
| 7865817 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7870022 | Bous et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7890848 | Bodin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7900133 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908628 | Swart et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920112 | Kurihara et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7920320 | Watson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8018431 | Zehr et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8117128 | Ishibashi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8131647 | Siegel et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8161198 | Kikuchi | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8165998 | Semerdzhiev | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8175925 | Rouaix | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8209623 | Barletta et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8260915 | Ashear | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8312096 | Cohen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8341210 | Lattyak et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8370196 | Choi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8417772 | Lin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8429028 | Hendricks et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8452797 | Paleja et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8510247 | Kane, Jr. et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
| 8601084 | Carlander | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8725565 | Ryan | May 2014 | B1 |
| 8793575 | Lattyak et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 20010007980 | Ishibashi et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025302 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026287 | Watanabe | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027450 | Shinoda et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027478 | Meier et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036822 | Mead et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037328 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039493 | Pustejovsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049623 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010050658 | Adams | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053975 | Kurihara | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002540 | DeMello et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010707 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012134 | Calaway | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026443 | Chang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035697 | McCurdy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046261 | Iwata et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049717 | Routtenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054059 | Schneiderman | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020057286 | Markel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059415 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069222 | McNeely | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069312 | Jones | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087532 | Barritz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020090934 | Mitchelmore | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091584 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020092031 | Dudkiewicz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095468 | Sakata | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020101447 | Carro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103809 | Starzl et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120635 | Joao | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123336 | Kamada | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126140 | Gorbet et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129012 | Green | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138291 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138649 | Cartmell et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143822 | Brid et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147724 | Fries et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165707 | Call | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184319 | Willner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194474 | Natsuno et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005002 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009459 | Chastain et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012216 | Novaes | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018720 | Chang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025731 | Chastain et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028395 | Rodgers et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040970 | Miller | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046233 | Ara et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030052928 | Williams | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058265 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065642 | Zee | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069812 | Yuen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076513 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090572 | Belz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093312 | Ukita et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093382 | Himeno et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097354 | Finlay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097361 | Huang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105679 | Krishnan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110503 | Perkes | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126123 | Kodama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129963 | Nurcahya | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135495 | Vagnozzi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152894 | Townshend | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163399 | Harper et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164844 | Kravitz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182551 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190145 | Copperman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191737 | Steele et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204496 | Ray et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212613 | Sarig | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002943 | Merrill et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003344 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040015467 | Fano | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023191 | Brown et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030686 | Cardno et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044723 | Bell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049743 | Bogward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054499 | Starzyk et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068471 | Kato | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078273 | Loeb et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078757 | Golovchinsky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098350 | Labrou et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117189 | Bennett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040120280 | Western | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128359 | Horvitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128539 | Shureih | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139400 | Allam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167822 | Chasen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201633 | Barsness et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205457 | Bent et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210561 | Shen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212941 | Haas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229194 | Yang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237033 | Woolf et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239703 | Angelica | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243613 | Pourheidari | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040252692 | Shim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254013 | Quraishi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254917 | Brill et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267552 | Gilliam et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040268253 | DeMello et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021464 | Lindauer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022113 | Hanlon | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044148 | Son et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044224 | Jun et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050066219 | Hoffman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069225 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050069849 | McKinney et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076012 | Manber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091604 | Davis | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097007 | Alger et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102618 | Naito | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125222 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050132281 | Pan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138007 | Amitay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138428 | McAllen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144221 | Shin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144895 | Grimes et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154601 | Halpern et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050176438 | Li | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177562 | Raciborski | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177567 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193330 | Peters | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195975 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050198070 | Lowry | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222977 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223315 | Shimizu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228836 | Bacastow et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250439 | Leslie | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256822 | Hollingsworth | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257261 | Shraim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262258 | Kohno et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289394 | Arrouye et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004840 | Senda | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020469 | Rast | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031316 | Forstadius | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060045470 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047830 | Nair et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047844 | Deng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048184 | Poslinski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053045 | Danielson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057960 | Tran | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061595 | Goede et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069697 | Shraim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060071754 | Tofts et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075205 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075444 | Dillen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077897 | Kotzin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080261 | Christal | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095404 | Adelman et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098900 | King et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060101328 | Albornoz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060109242 | Simpkins | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123053 | Scannell, Jr. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129618 | Maier | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129924 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060143558 | Albornoz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060145950 | Tanaka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060156222 | Chi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161578 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060175983 | Crouse et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179137 | Jennings, III et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190489 | Vohariwatt et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060190568 | Patterson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195431 | Holzgrafe et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209175 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236240 | Lebow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240799 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250994 | Sasaki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253441 | Nelson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253458 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060253461 | de Bonet | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256083 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265518 | Owens et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060271629 | MacDowell | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281058 | Mangoaela | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282797 | Barsness et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070005616 | Hay et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005757 | Finger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070014404 | Cha | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070016555 | Ito et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025704 | Tsukazaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070039023 | Kataoka | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050346 | Goel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055926 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061335 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061337 | Saito et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061803 | Barrett | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073596 | Alexander et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078273 | Hirota | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079236 | Schrier et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079383 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094285 | Agichtein et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094351 | Kalish et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112817 | Danninger | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118533 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070130109 | King et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136660 | Gurcan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136679 | Yang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142934 | Boercsoek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150456 | Lian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162961 | Tarrance et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174545 | Okada et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185865 | Budzik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070189719 | Furumachi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219983 | Fish | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233562 | Lidwell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233692 | Lisa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234209 | Williams | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238077 | Strachar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240187 | Beach et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070242225 | Bragg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250573 | Rothschild | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282809 | Hoeber et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070283173 | Webb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288853 | Neil | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005097 | Kleewein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005203 | Bots et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080005664 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016064 | Sareday et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016164 | Chandra | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027933 | Hussam | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080031595 | Cho | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080040233 | Wildman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059702 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066155 | Abraham | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082518 | Loftesness | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082911 | Sorotokin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080089665 | Thambiratnam et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113614 | Rosenblatt | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115224 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120101 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120280 | Iijima et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133479 | Zelevinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154908 | Datar et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080163039 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080164304 | Narasimhan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165141 | Christie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080168073 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208833 | Basmov | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222552 | Batarseh et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235351 | Banga et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243788 | Reztlaff et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243814 | Gurcan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080243828 | Reztlaff et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259057 | Brons | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080270930 | Slosar | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281058 | Araki | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080293450 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294674 | Reztlaff, II et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080295039 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080298083 | Watson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301820 | Stevens | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090094528 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090094540 | Gray et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181649 | Bull et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090228774 | Matheny et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090231233 | Liberatore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241054 | Hendricks | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263777 | Kohn | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090267909 | Chen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296331 | Choy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319482 | Norlander et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100023259 | Krumm et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100081120 | Nanjiani et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095340 | Ei et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125876 | Craner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131385 | Harrang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100164888 | Okumura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100188327 | Frid et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100284036 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100328223 | Mockarram-Dorri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110050591 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110050594 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110057884 | Gormish et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110069073 | Unger | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112671 | Weinstein | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191710 | Jang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267333 | Sakamoto et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110295926 | Battiston et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120001923 | Weinzimmer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120016774 | Dicke et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036431 | Ito et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041941 | King et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079372 | Kandekar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197998 | Kessel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120227001 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130219320 | Seet et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246157 | Puppin et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140218286 | Kim | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1362682 | Aug 2002 | CN |
| 1841373 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
| 101120358 | Feb 2008 | CN |
| 1197902 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1842150 | Oct 2007 | EP |
| 6274493 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| 07078139 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 09179870 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 10091640 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 11074882 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 2000501214 | Feb 2000 | JP |
| 2001052016 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2001052025 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2001100702 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001195412 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001236358 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2002099739 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002197079 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002259718 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002536736 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003016104 | Jan 2003 | JP |
| 2003122969 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003513384 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003516585 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003517158 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003186910 | Jul 2003 | JP |
| 2005056041 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2006011694 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006107496 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2006129323 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2006129327 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2006190114 | Jul 2006 | JP |
| 2008071334 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008516297 | May 2008 | JP |
| 2008527580 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008197634 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 1020020020262 | Mar 2002 | KR |
| WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO9720274 | Jun 1997 | WO |
| WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0045588 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0056055 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO0075840 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO0142978 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0239206 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO2004055647 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO2006078728 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages. |
| The Japanese Office mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 4 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Nov. 23, 2012, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 15 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages. |
| Beigbeder et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-pp. 1022. |
| Biskup, J., et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042 (retrieved Nov. 9, 2010. |
| Breu, M. et al., “The Medoc Distrubuted Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249. |
| Gladney, H. M.: “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194. |
| Henke, H. “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, pp. 1-14, retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.openebook.org/doc—library/surveys/IDPF—eBook—Features—2002.pdf> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010. |
| Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228. |
| Ziviani, N ED, Baeza-Yates R. et at: “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190. |
| Zobel, J. et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 1-56, NY, NY. |
| Card et al., “3Book: A 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-pp. 307. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages. |
| Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-pp. 125. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, mailed on Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages. |
| “Trilogy Definition”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages. |
| US Pat. Pub. No. 2004081300 dated Apr. 29, 2004, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-259718, 14 pages. |
| US Patent No. 7,340,436 dated Mar. 4, 2008, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-513384, 7 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Aciton mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages. |
| Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System ”, 47 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 5, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
| Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus—An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages. |
| Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages. |
| “Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ects| annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| “Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| “Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School r <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy . . . > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| The Chinese Second Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| The Chinese Third Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210. |
| Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006. |
| The European Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| The European Search report mailed Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Apr. 5, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
| International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages. |
| International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page. |
| International Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages. |
| PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, mailed on Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs. |
| PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, mailed on Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs. |
| “Say NO to Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| “The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19. |
| Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.com|news/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004]. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages. |
| The European Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 7 pages. |
| Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Mar. 24, 2014, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 26 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Apr. 25, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 4 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
| Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Jun. 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages. |
| International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages. |
| The European Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jul. 3, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 8,131,647, 5 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 5 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Mar. 16, 2010, 16 pgs. |
| Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Jan. 19, 2010, 31 pgs. |
| Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 15, 2009, 31 pgs. |
| Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Aug. 6, 2010, 17 pgs. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System ”, 47 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages. |
| BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998. |
| Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Oct. 5, 2011, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 75 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages. |
| Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
| Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
| “Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages. |
| The European Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 20010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 38 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, filed Mar. 29, 2007, John Lattyak; John Kim; Steven Moy; Laurent An Minh Nguyen, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System .” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin “Incremental Updates of Items .” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device .” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, filed Jan. 26, 2009, Thomas Dimson, Janna Hamaker, Eugene Kalenkovich, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.” |
| U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.” |
| “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.iett.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf. |
| Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm. |
| Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retreived on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61—3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs. |
| Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>. |
| Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC. |
| Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004. |
| Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages. |
| Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages. |
| Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/05/0009. |
| Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless adn Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages. |
| Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932. |
| “Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became—5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs. |
| Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, in the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89. |
| Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs. |
| Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg. |
| Means, et al., “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages. |
| Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184. |
| OQO “A full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>. |
| PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, mailed Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages). |
| “Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—Memory—Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs. |
| Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0. |
| “Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm. |
| “Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, W3C, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/. |
| Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs. |
| Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, mailed on Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action ”, 16 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 6 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages. |
| The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 9 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 pages. |
| European Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
| Malloy, et al. “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google—Search&oldid=118323867>>, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 pages. |
| The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 pages. |
| Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device ”, 16 pgs. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Sep. 4, 2014, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 pages. |
| Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024279, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages. |
| Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the internet Feb. 5, 2013, 120 pgs. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages. |
| Mintues of the Oral Proceedings mailed on Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 13 pages. |
| European Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 31 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 pages. |
| Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the internet on Nov. 6, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 pages. |
| “Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb. 2011, 170 pgs. |
| Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Feb. 5, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 21 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System ”, 10 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, mailed on Dec. 19, 2014, Girish Bansilal Bajaj, “Providing User Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Jul. 25, 2013, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on 8/13/14, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 pages. |
| Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2688002, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 5 pages. |
| Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 19 pages. |
| Canadian Office Action mailed Feb. 11, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2681755, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,349, 4 pages. |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Feb. 26, 2015, Thomas a. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 45 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60882870 | Dec 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11693677 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Child | 12949115 | US |