Invariant referencing in digital works

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9116657
  • Patent Number
    9,116,657
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 18, 2010
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 25, 2015
    10 years ago
  • CPC
  • Field of Search
    • US
    • 715 232000
    • 715 233000
    • 715 238000
    • 715 206000
    • CPC
    • G06F3/147
    • G06F17/30286
  • International Classifications
    • G06F3/147
    • Term Extension
      1133
Abstract
A method of presenting a digital work includes displaying a portion of the digital work on a display screen under a set of display conditions, and providing one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the portion of the digital work on the display screen. The invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work, and each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed.
Description
BACKGROUND

Electronic distribution of information has gained importance with the proliferation of personal computers and wide area networks such as the Internet. With the widespread use of the Internet, it has become possible to distribute large, coherent units of information, such as books, using electronic technologies. Books distributed using electronic technologies are commonly referred to as electronic books (“eBooks”). Various entities make eBooks available for download over ordinary Internet connections, such as broadband and dialup connections.


Typically, digital works are structured as virtual frames presented on a display device, and a user may turn or change from one virtual frame or “page” of electronic content to another. The term “page” as used herein refers to a collection of content that is presented at one time on a display. Thus, “pages” as described herein are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in display conditions, such as screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, or the like.


EBooks may be displayed and read on a variety of different display devices, such as computer monitors, portable digital assistants (PDAs), pocket personal computers (PCs), and specialized eBook reader devices, for example. The screen size of the various display options may vary greatly from one display device to another. For example, a computer monitor may have a screen size of twenty-one inches (measured diagonally) or more, while a pocket PC may have a screen size as small as a few inches. Simply by virtue of the larger screen size, more content can be displayed on the computer monitor at one time than on the pocket PC. Thus, content that appears on a certain page (e.g., page 10) of an eBook when displayed on a computer monitor may appear on a much later page (i.e., page 50) when displayed on a pocket PC or some other display device having a smaller screen size.


Font type also affects how much textual content can displayed on a display screen. Different fonts may have a different number of characters per inch and may have uniform or variable character widths. Perhaps more significantly, the size of the font also affects the amount of content displayed on a display screen. Generally, the smaller the font size, the more text that will fit on the display screen, and vice versa.


These and other display conditions (e.g., screen resolution, margins, line spacing, etc.) affect the amount of content that can be displayed on a given display screen. Accordingly, it may be difficult or impossible for a user reading an eBook on one display device to meaningfully communicate a page cite to a reader of the same eBook on another display device, because one or more of the foregoing display conditions may be different. For example, when a reader cites a meaningful quotation on page 27, line 3, this citation is likely to not be accurate for most other readers.


Another problem may arise when a user is in the middle of reading an eBook and decides to change the font type, font size, margins, or some other display condition. In that case, the user probably knows what page he or she was reading prior to the change in display condition. However, after the change, the content the user was previously reading will likely be found on a different page of the eBook, and the user may not be able to easily locate the place where he or she left off.


Thus, there remains a need to improve a method of identifying or referencing material within electronic content to improve a reader's ability to navigate within an eBook and to better identify a location within the eBook content.


SUMMARY

In view of the above, this disclosure describes ways of invariantly referencing locations within an electronic book, electronic content, or other digital work regardless of screen size, font size, or other variations in display of the digital work. In one aspect, a method of presenting a digital work includes displaying a portion of the digital work on a display screen under a set of display conditions, and providing one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the portion of the digital work on the display screen. The invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work, and each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed.


In another aspect, a method of indexing a digital work includes partitioning the digital work into a plurality of segments, generating a plurality of location reference identifiers, and sequentially assigning each segment of the digital work a unique location reference identifier. Each location reference identifier is uniquely assigned with a corresponding segment of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the digital work is displayed.


In still another aspect, a data structure of a digital work is stored on one or more computer-readable media. The data structure includes a first data field containing a header identifying content of the data structure, a second data field comprising data representing a digital work including text, and a third data field comprising invariant location reference identifiers. Each invariant location reference identifier is associated with a location in the digital work, such that when the data structure is read by a computer, each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the associated portion of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed by the computer.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.



FIG. 1 illustrates an implementation in which two display devices are displaying content of the same electronic book (“eBook”), along with a conventional page number on which the displayed content appears.



FIG. 2 illustrates another implementation in which two display devices are displaying content of the same eBook, along with a conventional page number on which the displayed content appears.



FIG. 3 illustrates another implementation in which two exemplary display devices are displaying content of the same eBook, along with a location reference identifier identifying a location in the eBook at which the displayed content appears.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary eBook reader device according to one implementation.



FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method of processing an eBook or other digital work to assign location reference identifiers prior to distribution to a consumer.



FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method of processing an eBook or other digital work to assign location reference identifiers after distribution to a consumer.



FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing several exemplary methods of partitioning an eBook or other digital work.



FIG. 8 shows how an eBook or other digital work might be displayed on the eBook reader device of FIG. 4, according to one exemplary display method.



FIG. 9 shows how an eBook or other digital work might be displayed on a portable digital assistant (PDA), according to another exemplary display method.



FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary method of providing location reference identifiers for an eBook or other digital work, based on a byte-count or other unit of data.



FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method of displaying an eBook or other digital work.



FIG. 12 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary data structure of an eBook or other digital work.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview


As mentioned above, a problem arises when attempting to identify and communicate a page or position within a digital work, due to the variable screen size, font type or size, margins, line spacing, resolution, and other variable display conditions of the display devices. This problem arises because the virtual frames or “pages” displayed on the display device are not fixed permanently, and may be redefined or repaginated based on variances in the display conditions. This disclosure is directed to invariant referencing of locations within a digital work, which allows a user to accurately reference a location within a digital work, regardless of screen size, font type, font size, or other variations in display conditions of the digital work.


In exemplary implementations described herein, the invariant location referencing is described in the context of an electronic book (“eBook”). The terms “eBook” and “digital work” are used synonymously and, as used herein, may include electronic or digital representations of printed works, as well as original electronic or digital content that may include text, multimedia, hypertext and/or hypermedia. Examples of eBooks and/or digital works include, but are not limited to, books, magazines, newspapers, periodicals, journals, reference materials, telephone books, textbooks, anthologies, instruction manuals, proceedings of meetings, forms, directories, maps, etc. Also, while various aspects and features are described herein as applied to an eBook reader, the concepts may be implemented in other electronic devices or electronic readers besides eBook reader devices including, for example, personal computers, portable computers (e.g., laptops or pocket PCs), personal digital assistants (PDAs), portable gaming devices, wireless phones, and the like.



FIG. 1 illustrates the problems arising from variable display conditions of display devices. FIG. 1 shows two display devices displaying a portion of a Romeo and Juliet eBook. One display device is a nineteen-inch computer monitor 100 displaying the eBook in twelve point font. The second display device is a PDA 102 with a two-inch by three-inch screen, displaying the eBook in eight point font. As shown in FIG. 1, both display devices 100 and 102 are displaying content from the same location in the eBook. However, the computer monitor 100 indicates that the displayed content can be found on virtual frame or page twenty-nine of the eBook, while the PDA 102 indicates that the displayed content is on virtual page one hundred eight of the eBook. This difference in page number is due to the different display conditions of the two display devices, and makes it difficult for a user of the eBook to refer another user to specific content in the eBook. For example, a user reading Romeo and Juliet on the nineteen inch monitor 100, would be unable to easily tell a user reading Romeo and Juliet on the PDA 102 where to go to read Romeo's metaphor: “Juliet is the sun!”



FIG. 2 illustrates a similar problem that arises if the user of one of the display devices decides to change the font size of the eBook, which would affect the virtual pagination of the eBook. For example, suppose that after putting on his reading glasses, the user reading Romeo and Juliet on the PDA 102 decides to change the font size to six point so that he does not have to turn the virtual page as frequently. In that case, Romeo's metaphor “Juliet is the Sun!” would appear on an earlier virtual page of the eBook, such as page sixty-eight for example, since more text would fit on each displayed page. The user may then have difficulty locating the point where he left off reading prior to the change in display conditions.



FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary invariant location referencing scheme that remedies the forgoing problems related to variations in display conditions. As shown in FIG. 3, a Romeo and Juliet eBook is again displayed by two different display devices 100 and 102 having different display conditions. However, in this case, rather than displaying a virtual page number, which could change with changes in display conditions, the display devices display an invariant location reference identifier 300 corresponding to at least a portion of the displayed content 302 (shown in a text box for clarity). The invariant location reference identifier 300 is a unique identifier that corresponds to a specific location or segment of content 302 in the eBook, which is not affected by changes in screen size, font type or size, resolution, or other display conditions. Thus, the invariant location reference identifier 300 provides a reference to the assigned text 302 regardless of display conditions of the display device. This allows users to easily convey a location of specific eBook content to other users reading the same eBook on other display devices and/or under different display conditions. In addition, the invariant location referencing scheme allows the display device to identify a location where a reader left off reading, even after a change in font type or size, margins, line spacing, and/or some other display condition. Consequently, a user is readily able to find a place where he or she left off reading, regardless of any changes in the display conditions.


In the implementation shown in FIG. 3, the invariant location reference identifier 300 is provided along with a total number of location references in the eBook (in this case 201 is the invariant location reference identifier and 2500 is the total number of location references in the eBook). This allows a user to know approximately where in the eBook the displayed content is found (in this case a little less than a tenth of the way through the eBook). However, the total number of location reference identifiers need not be provided, and the invariant location reference identifier 300 may be displayed alone or in combination with one or more other types of information, such as chapter, section, eBook title, author, reading time, or the like. In other embodiments, the invariant location reference identifier 300 may be within a chapter, section or the like (e.g., “Chapter 7, 201/900” to indicate location 201 of a total of 900 location references within Chapter 7).


Also, the invariant location reference identifier 300 is shown in a navigation bar 302 along the bottom of the display screen. However, in other implementations, the invariant location reference identifier 300 may be displayed in other locations on the screen and may be displayed continuously, periodically, and/or upon request of the user. For example, the invariant location reference identifier 300 could be displayed along the top of the display screen, along a side of the display screen, overlaid over content of the eBook, in a drop-down menu, or in any other known user interface or display technique. In another example, invariant location reference identifiers may be displayed upon a user selecting or pointing to a portion of the eBook or a location in the eBook corresponding to the given invariant location reference identifier.


Before discussing these and other invariant location referencing implementations in detail, an exemplary display device will be briefly described to provide context for the invariant location referencing techniques.


Exemplary eBook Reader Device


FIG. 4 illustrates one suitable display device 400 capable of employing invariant referencing techniques. However, virtually any other type of display device may be used to implement the invariant referencing described herein. In the illustrated implementation, the device 400 is embodied as a handheld eBook reader device. Various features of the display device 400 are described briefly below. However, a fuller description of this exemplary display device may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/277,893, filed Mar. 29, 2006, and entitled “Handheld Electronic Book Reader Device Having Dual Displays,” which is incorporated herein by reference.


As shown in FIG. 4, the eBook reader device 400 has a body or housing 402, a keyboard 404, and a dual display system comprised of a first display 406 and a second display 408. The device keyboard 404 includes a plurality of alphabetic, numeric, and/or function keys for entry of user input.


The first display 406 in the dual display system presents content in a human-readable format to the user. The content presented in the first display 406 may be digital works, such as electronic books, newspapers, or other readable or viewable materials. For example, the display 406 provides the text of the electronic books and also depicts any illustrations, tables, or graphic elements that might be contained in the electronic books.


The second display 408 of the dual display system is a narrow screen located adjacent to the content display 406. The narrow display 408 is illustrated as being positioned to the right of the content display 406, although it may be located elsewhere in the housing 402 in other implementations. The narrow display screen 408 may be responsive to user input registered via, for example, a finger, a stylus, or other similar pointing device. Additionally, the narrow display screen 408 may enable presentation of graphic elements that correspond to content displayed in the content display 406.


The eBook reader device 400 may also include a variety of user inputs 410 to navigate through and among eBooks and digital works. Examples of user inputs that may be present include buttons, scroll wheels, thumb wheels, thumb sticks, sensors that detect and register movement of a user's thumb or finger, tactile sensors, or any other conventional user input mechanism.


The eBook reader device 400 also has various internal components, which are referred to generally as eBook reader subsystems 412. In one implementation, the subsystems 412 include system storage 414 and a processing unit 416. The processing unit 416 interacts with the system storage 414 to facilitate operation of the eBook reader device 400. The system storage 414 may be used to store a plurality of eBooks 418 and other content, as well as software programs or other executable modules 420 that may be executed by the processing unit. Examples of such programs or modules might include indexing modules indexing eBooks with invariant location reference identifiers, reader programs, control modules (e.g., power management), network connection software, operating models, display drivers, sensor algorithms, page turn detectors, and the like.


The system storage 414 may include volatile memory (such as RAM), nonvolatile memory, removable memory, and/or non-removable memory, implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. Also, the processing unit 416 may include onboard memory in addition to or instead of the system storage 414. Some examples of storage media that may be included in the system storage 414 and/or processing unit 416 include, but are not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the eBook reader device 400. Any such computer storage media may be part of the eBook reader device 400.


Various instructions, methods and techniques described herein may be considered in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. for performing particular tasks or implementing particular abstract data types. These program modules and the like may be executed as native code or may be downloaded and executed, such as in a virtual machine or other just-in-time compilation execution environment. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments. An implementation of these modules and techniques may be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer-readable media.


Overview of Invariant Location Referencing


Invariant location referencing makes it possible to meaningfully identify and communicate a specific location or segment of content in an eBook, regardless of screen size, font type or size, resolution, or other display conditions of the display device. Generally, this is accomplished by assigning unique reference identifiers at locations throughout the content of a digital work, or to individual segments of the digital work. These reference identifiers are not dependent on display conditions of a display device on which the digital work is displayed. In that sense, the reference characters are invariant. The invariant location reference identifiers may be provided in addition to any dividing indicia in the digital work itself (e.g., page numbers, chapter numbers, book numbers, section numbers, etc.) and any virtual (variable) page numbering, or may be provided instead of such dividing indicia and/or virtual page numbering. The invariant location reference identifiers provide a reliable means by which a user can determine a location of content in the digital work and approximately where the content is relative to the beginning and end of the digital work. Invariant location reference identifiers may also be used as a means of identifying a source of a quotation or excerpt from an eBook, or when one eBook references a passage from another eBook (e.g., See Shakespeare, “Romeo and Juliet”, location 2105).


There are numerous ways of providing invariant location reference identifiers in, or in association with, content of a digital work. For example, invariant location reference identifiers may be embedded in, or appended to, a digital work after creation, but prior to distribution to a consumer. This approach is referred to herein as preprocessing. Alternatively, invariant location reference identifiers may be generated and associated with content of a digital work by a display device subsequent to distribution to a consumer and upon loading the digital work. This approach is referred to herein as post-processing. In still other implementations, a byte-count or address of data corresponding to content of the digital work may be used as the invariant location reference identifiers, in which case invariant location reference identifiers need not be specially generated. FIGS. 5-7 describe several exemplary methods of providing invariant location reference identifiers in, or in association with, content of a digital work.


Exemplary Preprocessing Method of Indexing a Digital Work


FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method 500 of indexing a digital work with invariant location reference identifiers prior to distribution to a consumer (“preprocessing”). The method 500 may apply to any digital work comprising at least some text. The method 500 begins, at 502, when a digital work is first captured (e.g., by scanning) from a printed document or film, or is created as an original digital work.


At 504, the digital work is partitioned into a plurality of segments. The digital work may be partitioned in numerous different ways. For example, in various implementations, each segment may correspond to an individual character, word, string of words, sentence, paragraph, or any other unit of textual content. Alternatively, each segment may correspond to a predetermined multiple of characters, words, sentences, or paragraphs (e.g., every tenth character, every other word, every fifth sentence, etc.). In still other implementations, the digital work may be partitioned into horizontal and/or vertical bands corresponding to predetermined areas of the original printed work (e.g., each segment may correspond to characters present in a one inch horizontal band of the original printed work). Each of these partitioning techniques will be described in more detail below with reference to FIG. 7.


A plurality of sequential, unique location reference identifiers is generated at 506, and, at 508, each segment of the digital work is sequentially assigned a unique location reference identifier. Thus, each location reference identifier is uniquely assigned to a corresponding segment of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the digital work is displayed. In other words, the location reference identifiers are invariant with respect to display conditions.


At 510, the invariant location reference identifiers are embedded, appended, or otherwise associated with locations or segments of the digital work. However, the location reference identifiers remain separate from the digital work in so far as the location reference identifiers are not characters of the digital work itself, but are separate identifiers that are associated with locations or segments of the digital work. Thus, the content of the digital work is unaltered by the provision of the location reference identifiers. Examples of ways in which the location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital work include attaching the location reference identifiers as meta data to the digital work, appending an index file of location reference identifiers to the digital work data file, and maintaining a location reference identifier index file apart from the digital work data file. However, location reference identifiers may also be associated with the digital work in any other known manner.


The digital work itself may or may not include some sort of indexing or dividing indicia of the content, such as page identifiers, chapter identifiers, section identifiers, figure identifiers, table identifiers, or the like. The invariant location references can be, but generally are not, based on any chapters, pages, or other dividing indicia in the body of the digital work. Thus, the location reference identifiers are generally generated independently of any location indicia in the digital work. Nevertheless, in some implementations, the location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital content based at least in part on location indicia in the digital work. In that case, at 512, the digital work may be searched for any dividing indicia in the digital work, and any such dividing indicia found may be replaced or overlaid with a corresponding invariant location reference identifier or a hyperlink to the same. Additionally, at 514, a table of contents may be generated, which references content of the digital work with hyperlinks to location reference identifiers corresponding to locations of the referenced content in the digital work.


Subsequently, at 516, the digital work is distributed to consumers along with the associated invariant location reference identifiers, and, at 518, the digital work may be loaded and displayed on a display device.


It should be understood that certain acts in method 500 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, the act 512 of searching for dividing indicia in the digital work and replacing or overlaying the dividing indicia with invariant location reference identifier and the act 514 of generating a table of contents can be omitted. Also, the order in which the acts of partitioning the digital work 504 and generating invariant location reference identifiers 506 are performed is not important and those acts may be reversed as desired.


Exemplary Post-Processing Method of Indexing a Digital Work


FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method 600 of indexing a digital work with invariant location reference identifiers subsequent to distribution to a consumer (“post-processing”). The method 600 is similar to that described above with respect to FIG. 5, except for the order and location at which invariant location reference identifiers are associated with a digital work. In this implementation, the invariant location reference identifiers are generated and associated with a digital work by the eBook reader or other display device, subsequent to distribution of the digital work to the consumer.


In method 600, the digital work is created or captured at 602, the digital work is distributed to consumers at 604, and loaded in memory of a display device at 606. At 608, the digital work is partitioned into segments by a program module in memory of the display device. Partitioning is performed in the same manner as discussed for method 500 above and explained further below with reference to FIG. 7. The program module of the display device also generates invariant location reference identifiers at 610, and, at 612, associates each invariant location reference identifier with a different location or segment of the partitioned digital work.


In some implementations, at 614, the program module of the display device may search the digital work for any dividing indicia in the digital work, and any such dividing indicia found may be replaced or overlaid with a corresponding invariant location reference identifier. Additionally, at 616, the program module of the display device may generate a table of contents, which references content of the digital work with hyperlinks to location reference identifiers corresponding to locations of the referenced content in the digital work. One or more of acts 608-616 may be performed automatically upon loading the digital work for display at 606.


At 618, the digital work is displayed on the display device along with the invariant location reference identifiers.


It should be understood that certain acts in method 600 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, the act 614 of searching for dividing indicia in the digital work and replacing or overlaying the dividing indicia with invariant location reference identifier and the act 616 of generating a table of contents can be omitted. Also, the order in which the acts of partitioning the digital work 608 and generating invariant location reference identifiers 610 are performed is not important and those acts may be reversed as desired.


Exemplary Partitioning Methods


FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating some exemplary methods of partitioning a digital work, which may, but need not necessarily, be used to partition the digital work in the methods 500 and 600 described above. FIG. 7 shows five different partitioning approaches: character-based partitioning 702, word-based partitioning 704, sentence-based partitioning 706, paragraph-based partitioning 708, and band-based partitioning 710. In some implementations, each of these approaches may be applied such that each segment into which the digital work is partitioned contains approximately the same amount of textual content. This uniformity of segments makes navigation within a digital work more intuitive, because a user can equate each invariant location reference identifier with a generally uniform amount of textual content. However, in other implementations, the segments may contain different amounts of textual content.


In the character-based approach 702, the digital work is partitioned such that each character of the digital work is a separate segment. Thus, in the implementation shown, the phrase “But, soft!” is partitioned into ten segments. This approach provides the highest resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires the most processing resources and generates the largest index file of location references.


In the word-based approach 704, the digital work is partitioned such that each word of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, each set of successively arranged characters separated by a space before and a space after will be treated as a word. Thus, in the implementation shown, the phrase “But, soft! What light through yonder window breaks!” is partitioned into eight segments. This approach provides somewhat lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the character-based approach.


In the sentence-based approach 706, the digital work is partitioned such that each sentence of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, any string of characters beginning with the first character of the digital work, the first character following a period, or the first character following a hard return, and ending with a period, question mark, or exclamation point will be treated as a sentence. Thus, the passage shown in this implementation has been partitioned into three segments. This approach provides still lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the word-based approach.


In the paragraph-based approach 708, the digital work is partitioned such that each paragraph of the digital work is a separate segment. For the purposes of this approach, any string of characters beginning with the first character of the digital work, the first character following a hard return, and the first character following a tab indention, and ending with a hard return will be treated as a paragraph. Thus, the passage shown in this implementation has been partitioned into three segments. This approach provides still lower resolution of referencing within the digital work, but also requires proportionately less processing resources and generates a proportionately smaller index file than the sentence-based approach.


In each of the foregoing character-, word-, sentence-, and paragraph-based approaches, images (e.g., tables, figures, charts, and other non-text subject matter) in a digital work may be treated as a predetermined number of one or more segments, and assigned one or more invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to the assigned segments. That is, every image, regardless of display size, resolution, file size, or other display conditions, may be assigned a predetermined number of one or more invariant location reference identifiers. For example, every image in a digital work may be assigned a single invariant location reference identifier, which may be the next sequential invariant location reference identifier following the invariant location reference identifier assigned to text preceding the image. Alternatively, each image may be assigned any other predetermined number of invariant location reference identifiers.


In other implementations, images may be proportionately assigned invariant location reference identifiers, based on the size of data corresponding to the image. That is, an image might be assigned one invariant location reference identifier for each byte (or multiple bytes) of data of the image. In other implementations, images may be treated as if they were one or more words (e.g., all images are treated as one word, or small images are treated as ten words while large images are treated as fifty words). In still other implementations, an image may be assigned a number of invariant location reference identifiers corresponding to an amount of text occupying approximately the same amount of data as the image (e.g., if an image is represented by about the same amount of data as thirty characters, the image will be assigned the same number of invariant location reference identifiers as would thirty characters of text).


The band-based approach 710 may be applied if the digital work is scanned or otherwise captured from a printed document or film. In the band based approach 710, the digital work is partitioned into segments of text corresponding to predetermined areas of the printed document. The bands may be horizontal and/or vertical. In the example shown in FIG. 7, the digital work is partitioned into horizontal bands for every one inch of the printed document (or approximately one inch, to include an entire line of text or image). Each segment consists of the characters or images falling within the corresponding horizontal band. For the purposes of this approach, all the characters beginning with the first character in the band and ending with the last character in the band will be considered part of the segment corresponding to that band. Thus, the passage shown in this implementation has been partitioned into two segments.


In some implementations, the size of the bands may be based at least in part on the font size, line spacing, or other formatting of the original printed copy of the work. For example, it may be desirable to size the bands such that each band contains a predetermined number of lines of text. This approach tends to standardize the amount of textual content between successive invariant location reference identifiers by standardizing the number of lines of text corresponding to each invariant location reference identifier regardless of font size, line spacing, or other formatting. In an implementation in which the bands are sized to fit a predetermined number of lines, the band size will be larger for printed works having larger font size and/or line spacing. For example, four lines of double spaced text in fourteen point font will occupy a band size of about 1.5 inches, whereas four lines of single spaced text in ten point font will occupy a band size of about 0.75 inches.


The band-based approach 710 is well suited to partitioning digital works that include images, figures, charts, or other non-text objects, since the objects can be partitioned into bands in the same manner as text. In the character-, word-, sentence-, and paragraph-based approaches, such objects are generally treated as a predetermined number of one or more segments (e.g., an object corresponds to one segment, five segments, etc.), regardless of the size or shape of the object.


Each of the foregoing approaches may be done on an individual character-, word-, sentence-, paragraph-, or band-basis as shown in FIG. 7, or may be performed for a predetermined multiple of characters, words, sentences, paragraphs, or bands. For example, a digital work may be segmented every N characters, words, sentences, paragraphs, or bands, where N is any number greater than one.


Some implementations may employ a hybrid or combination of the foregoing partitioning approaches. In that case, the various partitioning approaches may be performed before distribution to consumers (preprocessing), after distribution to consumers (post-processing), or both. For example, in one exemplary implementation, a digital work may be coarsely partitioned using the band-based approach 710 during preprocessing, and then subsequently more finely partitioned (e.g., by a consumer's display device) using the character-based approach 702 or word-based approach 704.


Once a digital work has been indexed (and in some cases even without indexing), the digital work can be presented on a display device along with invariant location reference identifiers.


Exemplary Displays of Digital Works with Invariant Location Referencing


FIGS. 8-10 illustrate display devices displaying digital works along with invariant location reference identifiers according to several exemplary implementations.



FIG. 8 shows an eBook reader 800 having a display screen 802, on which are displayed a header pane 804, a reading pane 806, and a navigation pane 808. The header pane 804 displays a title, author, date, time, or any other pertinent data to a user. The reading pane 806 displays content of an eBook or digital work for consumption by a user. The navigation pane 808 includes various interfaces that allow a user to easily navigate within and among eBooks and other content stored in memory or system storage of the eBook reader 800.


In the implementation shown, the navigation pane 808 includes a location field 810, showing a current invariant location reference identifier (in this case 2105) relative to the total number of location reference identifiers in the eBook (in this case 9000). The invariant location reference identifier displayed in the location field 810 may be the invariant location reference identifier corresponding to the first content displayed on the display screen (in this case “B,” “But,” “But, Soft,” etc. depending on the how the eBook was partitioned), the last content on the display screen (in this case “r,” “her,” etc.), or some selected content 814 on the display screen (in this case the word “east” is selected). This allows a user to know and communicate precisely where he or she is currently reading in the eBook and where the current location is relative to the beginning and end of the eBook content.


A search field 812 is also provided in the navigation bar 808. A user may enter an invariant location reference identifier in the search field 812 to skip to the corresponding portion of the eBook content.



FIG. 9 illustrates a PDA device 900 having a display screen 902, on which are displayed a header pane 904, a reading pane 906, and a navigation pane 908 in a manner similar in most respects to that of FIG. 8 described above. However, in this implementation, instead of being displayed in the navigation bar, a location field 910 displaying the current invariant location reference identifier is overlaid over a portion of the reading pane 906 adjacent to a selected portion of the digital work. The location field 910 may be displayed upon user selection or pointing to a specific character, word, sentence, paragraph, or other portion of the digital work. In the implementation shown, a user has selected the word “east” and in response the location field 910 has been displayed in a callout window adjacent the word east indicating the current invariant location reference identifier (in this case 2105). Location field 910 may be displayed upon request from the reader or upon other triggering type events or commands (e.g., save ending location, re-opening of file to last place left off, etc.).



FIG. 10 shows an exemplary way in which a digital work may be displayed with invariant location reference identifiers without the need to index the digital work. In this implementation, a location within the digital work is determined based on a byte-count or some other unit of data of the underlying digital work.


Each character in a digital work is represented by units of data. Each unit of data corresponds to some portion of the digital work. For example, each byte of data generally corresponds to about one character of the digital work. Accordingly, to determine a location of content within a digital work, it is possible to map the content to a byte of data corresponding to that content and determine the address or byte-count for that byte of data. The address or byte-count can then serve as an invariant location reference identifier for the digital work without any additional indexing. The current address or byte-count can then be provided relative to the total number of bytes in the file underlying the digital work to provide an indication of the current location relative to the beginning and end of the digital work.


In the implementation shown in FIG. 10, the user has selected or pointed to the word “east” in the displayed content. The first letter of the word “east” corresponds to byte number 2105 out of 9000 total bytes of data in an eBook data file 1002 residing in memory or system storage of the eBook reader. Accordingly, location field 1004 of the eBook reader 1000 displays the location 2105/9000. While this implementation is described in terms of byte-count, any other unit of data can alternatively be used as invariant location reference identifiers.


In some cases, such as where the digital work includes images in-line with text content, the byte-count may appear to jump at the point where the image is located, since the image may correspond to a significant amount of data. For example, as small image might consume 20,000 bytes or more. To counteract this jumping appearance, the images may be stored at the beginning or end of the text content, and then the images may be referred to from within the text via image pointers of fixed or heuristically chosen byte sizes.


Exemplary Method of Presenting a Digital Work


FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing an exemplary method 1100 of presenting a digital work along with invariant location referencing which may be implemented using the eBook reader, a computer monitor, a PDA, or any other suitable display device. For simplicity, the method 1100 is described as being implemented on the eBook reader of FIG. 4. For the purposes of describing the method of FIG. 11, it is assumed that one or more eBooks or other digital works are already stored in memory of the eBook reader.


Referring to again to FIG. 11, method 1100 includes, at 1102, displaying a portion of an eBook or digital work on a display screen under a set of display conditions (e.g., type of display device, screen size, font size, etc.). At 1104, a determination is made as to whether the digital work has any associated data comprising invariant location reference identifiers. If data comprising invariant location reference identifiers are determined to be present, the invariant location reference identifiers will be provided on the display screen based on the associated data. If associated data comprising invariant location reference identifiers are determined to be absent, the invariant location reference identifiers will be provided based on a byte count or other unit of data representing the displayed portion of the digital work.


At 1106, one or more invariant location reference identifiers are displayed which correspond to the portion of the digital work on the display screen. The invariant location reference identifiers are separate from the digital work in the sense that the location reference identifiers are not characters of the digital work itself, but are separate identifiers that are associated with locations or segments of the digital work. Thus, the content of the digital work is unaltered by the provision of the location reference identifiers. The location reference identifiers may be associated with the digital work by attaching the location reference identifiers as meta data to the digital work, appending an index file of location reference identifiers to the digital work data file, maintaining a location reference identifier index file apart from the digital work data file, or in any other known manner. In this manner, each invariant location reference identifier is provided along with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed.


In some implementations, at 1108, display and reading panes are displayed on the display screen. In that case, the displayed portion of the digital work is displayed in the reading pane and the invariant location reference identifiers are provided in the navigation pane. Additionally or alternatively, at 1110, invariant location reference identifiers may be overlaid on the parts of the digital work with which the invariant location reference identifiers are respectively associated. Also additionally or alternatively, the invariant location reference identifiers are provided in response to user selection of or pointing to a part (e.g., a character, word, sentence, paragraph, object, or other content) of the digital work displayed on the display screen.


In various implementations, the invariant location reference identifiers may correspond to one or more characters, words, sentences, paragraphs, images, figures, bands, or objects of the digital work. The invariant location reference identifiers may include any combination of letters, numbers, punctuation, symbols, or other characters. For ease of use, it may be desirable that the invariant location reference identifiers are numerals and/or include an easily manageable number of characters (e.g., at most four characters). Also, the invariant location reference identifiers may, but need not, include a decimal point, comma, colon, or other punctuation (e.g., 210.5 or 2,105 or 2:1:05) to assist a user in navigating the digital work.


However, invariant location reference identifiers having any number of digits and/or characters may be used. For example, more digits or characters may be desirable in cases using a partitioning approach to partition a work into having more than 9999 segments (e.g., a work partitioned using the character-based approach and having more than 9999 characters, or a work partitioned using the byte-based approach and having more than 9999 bytes). Additionally or alternatively, works having more segments could be scaled down to a desired number of digits (e.g., by truncating the actual number of invariant location reference identifiers—123,456 truncated to 1,234, dividing by a predetermined factor determined factor, dividing by a factor heuristically determined on a per-title basis to optimize display, etc.).


It may be desirable in some instances to assign each invariant location reference identifier to a substantially uniform amount of content. Thus, in some implementations, shorter works may have fewer invariant location reference identifiers than longer works. However, in other implementations, digital works may have a standard number of invariant location reference identifiers (e.g., 9999). Regardless of the nature and length of the invariant location reference identifiers displayed, it may be possible in some implementations to allow for more specific or precise referencing within the digital work. For example, referring back to FIG. 8, even though the invariant location reference identifier is displayed as a four digit number (i.e., 2105), a user may enter a more specific invariant location reference identifier (e.g., 2105.25) in the search field and will be taken to the location of the more specific invariant location reference identifier in the digital work. This precision may be accomplished by, for example, partitioning the digital work into more segments than the displayed number of invariant location reference identifiers (“hidden precision”), or by interpolating a location within each segment as a percentage of the segment (“interpolation”).


In the hidden precision approach, the digital work is partitioned into a larger number of segments than are displayed (e.g., work is partitioned into 999,999 segments, but the work is displayed as having 9,999 invariant location reference identifiers). Thus, a user is able to search within the additional two decimal places that are hidden and not displayed. In the interpolation approach, the work is partitioned into the same number of segments as displayed invariant location reference identifiers (e.g., 9,999), and the approximate location within the segment is determined as a percentage of the additional places of precision (e.g., 2105.25 is 25% of the way between segments 2105 and 2106). Thus, applying the interpolation approach to the example of FIG. 8, invariant location reference identifiers 2105.0-2105.24 correspond to the letter “E”, 2105.25-2105.49 correspond to the letter “A”, 2105.50-2105.74 correspond to the letter “S”, and 2105.75-2105.99 correspond to the letter “T”. The interpolation approach may also be implemented using the band-based partitioning approach, but partitioning each segment into a number of vertical bands equal to the inverse of the additional places of precision (e.g., 1/0.25=4 vertical bands), rounded up or down as necessary.


In some implementations, the method 1100 may further include, at 1112, presenting a search field for entry of an invariant location reference identifier and, in response to user entry of the invariant location reference identifier in the search field, updating the display screen to display a portion of the digital work corresponding to the entered invariant location reference identifier. Also in some implementations, the method 1100 may include, at 1114, providing a table of contents referencing content of the digital work based on corresponding invariant location reference identifiers.


It should be understood that certain acts in method 1100 need not be performed in the order described, may be modified and/or may be omitted entirely, depending on the circumstances. For example, any one or more of acts 1106-1114 may be omitted.


Moreover, any of the acts of any of the methods described herein may be implemented by a processor or other computing device based on instructions stored on one or more computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a preprocessing system, display device, and/or digital work, as appropriate. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by the preprocessing system, display device, and/or digital work. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.


Data Structure of eBook



FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary eBook data structure 1200 including a header field 1202, a content field 1204 comprising data representing an eBook or digital work, a location reference field 1206 including an index of invariant location reference identifiers and an indication of the portions of the content to which they correspond, and an end data field 1208 designating an end of the data structure 1200. In this implementation, the invariant location reference identifiers are configured as a separate data field from the content of the digital work, but are part of the same data structure. The data structure 1200 may be in any desired programming language, and may include various other data fields as necessary or desired.


The location reference field 1206 may include a variety of other information regarding the invariant location reference identifiers and how they are indexed with respect to the digital work, such as, for example, a table of contents, a list of hyperlinks or pointers to various locations within the digital work, a list of byte-counts or addresses in the underlying file of the digital work, and/or any other information about how the digital work is indexed.


CONCLUSION

Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claims. For example, the methodological acts need not be performed in the order or combinations described herein, and may be performed in any combination of one or more acts.

Claims
  • 1. A method of presenting eBook content on an eBook reader device, the method comprising: displaying a portion of the eBook content on a display screen of the eBook reader device under a set of display conditions; anddisplaying on the display screen of the eBook reader device an invariant location reference identifier based at least in part upon a non-repeating sequential byte-number corresponding to the portion of the eBook content displayed on the display screen, wherein a plurality of the non-repeating sequential byte numbers are associated with the eBook content, such that the eBook content is unaltered by provision of the non-repeating sequential byte numbers.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying the invariant location reference identifier concurrently with the corresponding portion of the eBook content, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the eBook content is displayed, wherein display conditions include at least one of a screen size of the eBook reader, a font type of the eBook content, a font size of the eBook content, a display margin of the eBook content, a line spacing of the eBook content or a screen resolution of the eBook reader.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising displaying a reading pane and a navigation pane on the display screen of the eBook reader device, the portion of the eBook content being displayed in the reading pane and the invariant location reference identifier being displayed in the navigation pane.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the non-repeating sequential byte number corresponds to at least one of: a text character, a word or string of words, a sentence, a paragraph, a figure, an image, a chart, a table, or a non-text object of the eBook content.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising presenting a search field for entry of another invariant location reference identifier.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, further comprising at least partly in response to user entry of the other invariant location reference identifier in the search field, updating the display screen to display a portion of the eBook content corresponding to the other invariant location reference identifier.
  • 7. A method comprising: displaying a portion of a digital work on a display; andproviding on the display an invariant location reference identifier corresponding to the portion of the digital work on the display, the invariant location reference identifier being separate from content of the digital work, wherein at least one of an image, figure, table, chart, or non-text object of the digital work is associated with the invariant location reference identifier.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining the invariant location reference identifier based at least in part upon an associated sequential byte number.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, further comprising displaying the invariant location reference identifier concurrently with the corresponding portion of the digital work, regardless of display conditions under which the portion of the digital work is displayed, wherein display conditions include at least one of a screen size of the display, a font type of the digital work, a font size of the digital work, a display margin of the digital work, a line spacing of the digital work or a screen resolution of the display.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, further comprising displaying a reading pane and a navigation pane on the display, the portion of the digital work being displayed in the reading pane and the invariant location reference identifier being displayed in the navigation pane.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining the invariant location reference identifier as a numeric identifier.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising truncating the numeric identifier to comprise four or fewer digits.
  • 13. The method of claim 7, wherein the number of invariant location reference identifiers is standard amongst a plurality of electronic content items.
  • 14. A method of presenting electronic content on an electronic reader device, the method comprising: displaying a reading pane and a navigation pane on a display screen of the electronic reader device;displaying a portion of the electronic content in the reading pane displayed on the display screen of the electronic reader device under a set of display conditions; anddisplaying, in the navigation pane on the display screen of the electronic reader device, an invariant location reference identifier, wherein the invariant location reference identifier is associated with a sequential byte number associated with the displayed portion of the electronic content.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising determining the invariant location reference identifier based at least in part upon a byte number corresponding to the portion of the electronic content displayed in the reading pane on the display screen, the invariant location reference identifier being separate from the electronic content, such that the electronic content is unaltered by provision of the location reference identifier.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, further comprising displaying the invariant location reference identifier concurrently with the portion of the electronic content, regardless of the display conditions under which the portion of the electronic content is displayed, wherein display conditions include at least one of a screen size of the electronic reader device, a font type of the electronic content, a font size of the electronic content, a display margin of the electronic content, a line spacing of the electronic content or a screen resolution of the electronic reader device.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the invariant location reference identifier corresponds to at least one of: a text character, a word or string of words, a sentence, a paragraph, a figure, an image, a chart, a table, or a non-text object of the electronic content.
  • 18. The method of claim 14, further comprising: determining that the electronic content has associated data comprising a plurality of invariant location reference identifiers; andproviding the invariant location reference identifiers based at least in part on the associated data comprising invariant location reference identifiers.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the associated data includes at least one of metadata or an index file.
  • 20. The method of claim 14, further comprising: determining that metadata associated with the electronic content does not contain a plurality of invariant location reference identifiers; andproviding the invariant location reference identifiers based at least in part on byte data representing the displayed portion of the electronic content.
PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/693,677 filed Mar. 29, 2007 and titled “Invariant Referencing in Digital Works” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional application 60/882,870 filed Dec. 29, 2006, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (503)
Number Name Date Kind
2684955 Knowles Sep 1954 A
4622627 Rodriguez et al. Nov 1986 A
4985697 Boulton Jan 1991 A
5418549 Anderson et al. May 1995 A
5495268 Pearson et al. Feb 1996 A
5499359 Vijaykumar Mar 1996 A
5517407 Weiner May 1996 A
5544305 Ohmaye et al. Aug 1996 A
5566098 Lucente et al. Oct 1996 A
5600775 King et al. Feb 1997 A
5623260 Jones Apr 1997 A
5630159 Zancho May 1997 A
5640553 Schultz Jun 1997 A
5659742 Beattie et al. Aug 1997 A
5661635 Huffman et al. Aug 1997 A
5663748 Huffman et al. Sep 1997 A
5696982 Tanigawa et al. Dec 1997 A
5710922 Alley et al. Jan 1998 A
5711922 O'Brien et al. Jan 1998 A
5742905 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5761485 Munyan Jun 1998 A
5765168 Burrows Jun 1998 A
5774109 Winksy et al. Jun 1998 A
5813017 Morris Sep 1998 A
5845278 Kirsch et al. Dec 1998 A
5845301 Rivette et al. Dec 1998 A
5847698 Reavey et al. Dec 1998 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5923861 Bertram et al. Jul 1999 A
5930026 Jacobson et al. Jul 1999 A
5940846 Akiyama Aug 1999 A
5956048 Gaston Sep 1999 A
5960411 Hartman et al. Sep 1999 A
5973681 Tanigawa et al. Oct 1999 A
5991439 Tanaka et al. Nov 1999 A
6018575 Gross et al. Jan 2000 A
6034839 Hamming Mar 2000 A
6037954 McMahon Mar 2000 A
6041335 Merritt et al. Mar 2000 A
6047189 Yun et al. Apr 2000 A
6049334 Bates et al. Apr 2000 A
6049796 Siitonen et al. Apr 2000 A
6064980 Jacobi et al. May 2000 A
6073148 Rowe et al. Jun 2000 A
6113394 Edgar Sep 2000 A
6148340 Bittinger et al. Nov 2000 A
6154757 Krause et al. Nov 2000 A
6164974 Carlile et al. Dec 2000 A
6195698 Lillibridge et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201771 Otsuka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6226642 Beranek et al. May 2001 B1
6233318 Picard et al. May 2001 B1
6272461 Meredith et al. Aug 2001 B1
6300947 Kanevsky Oct 2001 B1
6308320 Burch Oct 2001 B1
6313828 Chombo Nov 2001 B1
6331866 Eisenberg Dec 2001 B1
6331867 Eberhard et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335678 Heutschi Jan 2002 B1
6351750 Duga et al. Feb 2002 B1
6385596 Wiser et al. May 2002 B1
6401086 Bruckner Jun 2002 B1
6401239 Miron Jun 2002 B1
6442651 Crow et al. Aug 2002 B2
6449627 Baer et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457030 Adams et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466951 Birkler et al. Oct 2002 B1
6484212 Markowitz et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487669 Waring Nov 2002 B1
6493734 Sachs et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496803 Seet et al. Dec 2002 B1
6529920 Arons et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535857 Clarke, III et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542874 Walker et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559882 Kerchner May 2003 B1
6560699 Konkle May 2003 B1
6574658 Gabber et al. Jun 2003 B1
6629138 Lambert et al. Sep 2003 B1
6631495 Kato et al. Oct 2003 B2
6642947 Feierbach Nov 2003 B2
6658623 Schilit et al. Dec 2003 B1
6685482 Hopp et al. Feb 2004 B2
6687878 Eintracht et al. Feb 2004 B1
6704733 Clark et al. Mar 2004 B2
6721869 Senthil Apr 2004 B1
6724403 Santoro et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725227 Li Apr 2004 B1
6726487 Dalstrom Apr 2004 B1
6735583 Bjarnestam et al. May 2004 B1
6744891 Allen Jun 2004 B1
6744967 Kaminski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6801751 Wood et al. Oct 2004 B1
6803930 Simonson Oct 2004 B1
6804489 Stuppy et al. Oct 2004 B2
6829594 Kitamura Dec 2004 B1
6847966 Sommer et al. Jan 2005 B1
6904449 Quinones Jun 2005 B1
6912398 Domnitz Jun 2005 B1
6933928 Lilienthal Aug 2005 B1
6938076 Meyer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6947922 Glance Sep 2005 B1
6948135 Ruthfield et al. Sep 2005 B1
6953343 Townshend Oct 2005 B2
6966029 Ahern Nov 2005 B1
6980652 Braitberg et al. Dec 2005 B1
6985932 Glaser et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992687 Baird et al. Jan 2006 B1
6999565 Delaney et al. Feb 2006 B1
7007015 Nayak Feb 2006 B1
7009596 Seet et al. Mar 2006 B2
7010500 Aarnio Mar 2006 B2
7010751 Shneiderman Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7020663 Hay et al. Mar 2006 B2
7054914 Suzuki et al. May 2006 B2
7057591 Hautanen et al. Jun 2006 B1
7062707 Knauft et al. Jun 2006 B1
7071930 Kondo et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089292 Roderick et al. Aug 2006 B1
7092116 Calaway Aug 2006 B2
7103848 Barsness et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107533 Duncan et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111250 Hayward et al. Sep 2006 B1
7130841 Goel et al. Oct 2006 B1
7133506 Smith Nov 2006 B1
7135932 Quadir et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149776 Roy et al. Dec 2006 B1
7165217 Kondo Jan 2007 B1
7181502 Incertis Feb 2007 B2
7188085 Pelletier Mar 2007 B2
7191346 Abe et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209888 Frid-Nielsen et al. Apr 2007 B2
7216116 Nilsson et al. May 2007 B1
7237123 LeVine et al. Jun 2007 B2
7246118 Chastain et al. Jul 2007 B2
7249046 Katsurabayashi et al. Jul 2007 B1
7249060 Ling Jul 2007 B2
7249324 Nakamura et al. Jul 2007 B2
7257577 Fagin et al. Aug 2007 B2
7287068 Eriksson et al. Oct 2007 B1
7290285 McCurdy et al. Oct 2007 B2
7298851 Hendricks et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304635 Seet et al. Dec 2007 B2
7310629 Mendelson et al. Dec 2007 B1
7313759 Sinisi Dec 2007 B2
7350704 Barsness et al. Apr 2008 B2
7355591 Sugimoto Apr 2008 B2
7375649 Gueziec May 2008 B2
7383505 Shimizu et al. Jun 2008 B2
7386480 Sarig Jun 2008 B2
7386804 Ho et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398244 Keith Jul 2008 B1
7401286 Hendricks et al. Jul 2008 B1
7454238 Vinayak et al. Nov 2008 B2
7461406 Pelly et al. Dec 2008 B2
7496767 Evans Feb 2009 B2
7506246 Hollander et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506356 Gupta et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509270 Hendricks et al. Mar 2009 B1
7519278 Ikeda et al. Apr 2009 B2
7533152 Stark et al. May 2009 B2
7539478 Herley et al. May 2009 B2
7562032 Abbosh et al. Jul 2009 B2
7562038 Brumfield et al. Jul 2009 B1
7574653 Croney et al. Aug 2009 B2
7631013 Parsons et al. Dec 2009 B2
7634429 Narin et al. Dec 2009 B2
7656127 Shutt et al. Feb 2010 B1
7657459 Anderson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7657831 Donahue Feb 2010 B2
7680849 Heller et al. Mar 2010 B2
7716224 Reztlaff, II et al. May 2010 B2
7720892 Healey et al. May 2010 B1
7747949 Incertis Carro Jun 2010 B2
7760986 Beuque Jul 2010 B2
7788369 McAllen et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792756 Plastina et al. Sep 2010 B2
7835989 Hendricks et al. Nov 2010 B1
7849393 Hendricks et al. Dec 2010 B1
7865405 Hendricks et al. Jan 2011 B2
7865567 Hendricks et al. Jan 2011 B1
7865817 Ryan et al. Jan 2011 B2
7870022 Bous et al. Jan 2011 B2
7890848 Bodin et al. Feb 2011 B2
7900133 Cragun et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908628 Swart et al. Mar 2011 B2
7920112 Kurihara et al. Apr 2011 B2
7920320 Watson et al. Apr 2011 B2
8018431 Zehr et al. Sep 2011 B1
8117128 Ishibashi Feb 2012 B2
8131647 Siegel et al. Mar 2012 B2
8161198 Kikuchi Apr 2012 B2
8165998 Semerdzhiev Apr 2012 B2
8175925 Rouaix May 2012 B1
8209623 Barletta et al. Jun 2012 B2
8260915 Ashear Sep 2012 B1
8312096 Cohen et al. Nov 2012 B2
8341210 Lattyak et al. Dec 2012 B1
8370196 Choi et al. Feb 2013 B2
8417772 Lin et al. Apr 2013 B2
8429028 Hendricks et al. Apr 2013 B2
8452797 Paleja et al. May 2013 B1
8510247 Kane, Jr. et al. Aug 2013 B1
8601084 Carlander Dec 2013 B2
8725565 Ryan May 2014 B1
8793575 Lattyak et al. Jul 2014 B1
20010007980 Ishibashi et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010025302 Suzuki et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010026287 Watanabe Oct 2001 A1
20010027450 Shinoda et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010027478 Meier et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010036822 Mead et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037328 Pustejovsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039493 Pustejovsky et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010049623 Aggarwal et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010050658 Adams Dec 2001 A1
20010053975 Kurihara Dec 2001 A1
20020002540 DeMello et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010707 Chang et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010759 Hitson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012134 Calaway Jan 2002 A1
20020026443 Chang et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020035697 McCurdy et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020046261 Iwata et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049717 Routtenberg et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020054059 Schneiderman May 2002 A1
20020057286 Markel et al. May 2002 A1
20020059415 Chang et al. May 2002 A1
20020069222 McNeely Jun 2002 A1
20020069312 Jones Jun 2002 A1
20020087532 Barritz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020090934 Mitchelmore Jul 2002 A1
20020091584 Clark et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092031 Dudkiewicz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020095468 Sakata Jul 2002 A1
20020101447 Carro Aug 2002 A1
20020103809 Starzl et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120635 Joao Aug 2002 A1
20020123336 Kamada Sep 2002 A1
20020126140 Gorbet et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129012 Green Sep 2002 A1
20020138291 Vaidyanathan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138649 Cartmell et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143822 Brid et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020147724 Fries et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165707 Call Nov 2002 A1
20020184319 Willner et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020194474 Natsuno et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030005002 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030009459 Chastain et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012216 Novaes Jan 2003 A1
20030018720 Chang et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030025731 Chastain et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030028395 Rodgers et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040970 Miller Feb 2003 A1
20030046233 Ara et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030052928 Williams Mar 2003 A1
20030058265 Robinson et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065642 Zee Apr 2003 A1
20030069812 Yuen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076513 Sugimoto et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030090572 Belz et al. May 2003 A1
20030093312 Ukita et al. May 2003 A1
20030093382 Himeno et al. May 2003 A1
20030097354 Finlay et al. May 2003 A1
20030097361 Huang et al. May 2003 A1
20030105679 Krishnan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110503 Perkes Jun 2003 A1
20030126123 Kodama Jul 2003 A1
20030129963 Nurcahya Jul 2003 A1
20030135495 Vagnozzi Jul 2003 A1
20030152894 Townshend Aug 2003 A1
20030163399 Harper et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164844 Kravitz et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030182551 Frantz et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030190145 Copperman et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191737 Steele et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204496 Ray et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030212613 Sarig Nov 2003 A1
20040002943 Merrill et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003344 Lai et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003398 Donian et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015467 Fano Jan 2004 A1
20040023191 Brown et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030686 Cardno et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044723 Bell et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049743 Bogward Mar 2004 A1
20040054499 Starzyk et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040068471 Kato Apr 2004 A1
20040078273 Loeb et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078757 Golovchinsky et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098350 Labrou et al. May 2004 A1
20040117189 Bennett Jun 2004 A1
20040120280 Western Jun 2004 A1
20040128359 Horvitz et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040128539 Shureih Jul 2004 A1
20040139400 Allam et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040167822 Chasen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040201633 Barsness et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205457 Bent et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210561 Shen Oct 2004 A1
20040212941 Haas et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040229194 Yang Nov 2004 A1
20040237033 Woolf et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239703 Angelica Dec 2004 A1
20040243613 Pourheidari Dec 2004 A1
20040252692 Shim et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254013 Quraishi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040254917 Brill et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267552 Gilliam et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268253 DeMello et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021464 Lindauer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050022113 Hanlon Jan 2005 A1
20050044148 Son et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050044224 Jun et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050066219 Hoffman et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069225 Schneider et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069849 McKinney et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050076012 Manber et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088410 Chaudhri Apr 2005 A1
20050091604 Davis Apr 2005 A1
20050097007 Alger et al. May 2005 A1
20050102618 Naito May 2005 A1
20050125222 Brown et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132281 Pan et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138007 Amitay Jun 2005 A1
20050138428 McAllen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144221 Shin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144895 Grimes et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050154601 Halpern et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050176438 Li Aug 2005 A1
20050177562 Raciborski Aug 2005 A1
20050177567 Hughes et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193330 Peters Sep 2005 A1
20050195975 Kawakita Sep 2005 A1
20050198070 Lowry Sep 2005 A1
20050222977 Zhou et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223315 Shimizu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050228836 Bacastow et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050250439 Leslie Nov 2005 A1
20050256822 Hollingsworth Nov 2005 A1
20050257261 Shraim et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262258 Kohno et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050289394 Arrouye et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004840 Senda Jan 2006 A1
20060020469 Rast Jan 2006 A1
20060031316 Forstadius Feb 2006 A1
20060045470 Poslinski et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047830 Nair et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060047844 Deng Mar 2006 A1
20060048184 Poslinski et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060053045 Danielson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057960 Tran Mar 2006 A1
20060061595 Goede et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060069697 Shraim et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071754 Tofts et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075205 Martin et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060075444 Dillen Apr 2006 A1
20060077897 Kotzin Apr 2006 A1
20060080261 Christal Apr 2006 A1
20060095404 Adelman et al. May 2006 A1
20060098900 King et al. May 2006 A1
20060101328 Albornoz et al. May 2006 A1
20060109242 Simpkins May 2006 A1
20060123053 Scannell, Jr. Jun 2006 A1
20060129618 Maier Jun 2006 A1
20060129924 Nelson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143558 Albornoz et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060145950 Tanaka Jul 2006 A1
20060156222 Chi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161578 Siegel et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161635 Lamkin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060175983 Crouse et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060179137 Jennings, III et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190489 Vohariwatt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190568 Patterson Aug 2006 A1
20060195431 Holzgrafe et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060209175 Cohen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060236240 Lebow Oct 2006 A1
20060240799 Kim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250994 Sasaki et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253441 Nelson Nov 2006 A1
20060253458 Dixon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060253461 de Bonet Nov 2006 A1
20060256083 Rosenberg Nov 2006 A1
20060265518 Owens et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271629 MacDowell Nov 2006 A1
20060281058 Mangoaela Dec 2006 A1
20060282797 Barsness et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005616 Hay et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005757 Finger et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070014404 Cha Jan 2007 A1
20070016555 Ito et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025704 Tsukazaki et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039023 Kataoka Feb 2007 A1
20070050346 Goel et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055926 Christiansen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061335 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061337 Saito et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061803 Barrett Mar 2007 A1
20070073596 Alexander et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078273 Hirota Apr 2007 A1
20070079236 Schrier et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070079383 Gopalakrishnan Apr 2007 A1
20070094285 Agichtein et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070094351 Kalish et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070105536 Tingo, Jr. May 2007 A1
20070112817 Danninger May 2007 A1
20070118533 Ramer et al. May 2007 A1
20070130109 King et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136660 Gurcan et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136679 Yang Jun 2007 A1
20070142934 Boercsoek et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150456 Lian et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070162961 Tarrance et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070174545 Okada et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185865 Budzik et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189719 Furumachi et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219983 Fish Sep 2007 A1
20070233562 Lidwell et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070233692 Lisa et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070234209 Williams Oct 2007 A1
20070238077 Strachar Oct 2007 A1
20070240187 Beach et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070242225 Bragg et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070250573 Rothschild Oct 2007 A1
20070282809 Hoeber et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070283173 Webb et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288853 Neil Dec 2007 A1
20080005097 Kleewein et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005203 Bots et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080005664 Chandra Jan 2008 A1
20080016064 Sareday et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016164 Chandra Jan 2008 A1
20080027933 Hussam Jan 2008 A1
20080031595 Cho Feb 2008 A1
20080040233 Wildman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080059702 Lu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066155 Abraham Mar 2008 A1
20080082518 Loftesness Apr 2008 A1
20080082911 Sorotokin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089665 Thambiratnam et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080113614 Rosenblatt May 2008 A1
20080115224 Jogand-Coulomb et al. May 2008 A1
20080120101 Johnson et al. May 2008 A1
20080120280 Iijima et al. May 2008 A1
20080133479 Zelevinsky et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154908 Datar et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163039 Ryan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080164304 Narasimhan et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165141 Christie Jul 2008 A1
20080168073 Siegel et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080208833 Basmov Aug 2008 A1
20080222552 Batarseh et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235351 Banga et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080243788 Reztlaff et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243814 Gurcan et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243828 Reztlaff et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080259057 Brons Oct 2008 A1
20080270930 Slosar Oct 2008 A1
20080281058 Araki Nov 2008 A1
20080293450 Ryan et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294674 Reztlaff, II et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080295039 Nguyen et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080298083 Watson et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080301820 Stevens Dec 2008 A1
20090094528 Gray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094540 Gray et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090181649 Bull et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228774 Matheny et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090231233 Liberatore Sep 2009 A1
20090241054 Hendricks Sep 2009 A1
20090263777 Kohn Oct 2009 A1
20090267909 Chen et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090296331 Choy Dec 2009 A1
20090319482 Norlander et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100023259 Krumm et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100081120 Nanjiani et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095340 Ei et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100125876 Craner et al. May 2010 A1
20100131385 Harrang et al. May 2010 A1
20100164888 Okumura et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100188327 Frid et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100284036 Ahn et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100328223 Mockarram-Dorri et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110050591 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110050594 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110057884 Gormish et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110069073 Unger Mar 2011 A1
20110112671 Weinstein May 2011 A1
20110191710 Jang et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110267333 Sakamoto et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110295926 Battiston et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001923 Weinzimmer et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120016774 Dicke et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120036431 Ito et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041941 King et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120079372 Kandekar et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120197998 Kessel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120227001 Gupta et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130219320 Seet et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130246157 Puppin et al. Sep 2013 A1
20140218286 Kim Aug 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (48)
Number Date Country
1362682 Aug 2002 CN
1841373 Oct 2006 CN
101120358 Feb 2008 CN
101120358 Feb 2008 CN
1197902 Apr 2002 EP
1842150 Oct 2007 EP
6274493 Sep 1994 JP
07078139 Mar 1995 JP
09179870 Jul 1997 JP
10091640 Apr 1998 JP
11074882 Mar 1999 JP
2000501214 Feb 2000 JP
2001052016 Feb 2001 JP
2001052025 Feb 2001 JP
2001100702 Apr 2001 JP
2001195412 Jul 2001 JP
2001236358 Aug 2001 JP
2002099739 Apr 2002 JP
2002197079 Jul 2002 JP
2002259718 Sep 2002 JP
2002536736 Oct 2002 JP
2003016104 Jan 2003 JP
2003122969 Apr 2003 JP
2003513384 Apr 2003 JP
2003516585 May 2003 JP
2003517158 May 2003 JP
2003186910 Jul 2003 JP
2005056041 Mar 2005 JP
2006011694 Jan 2006 JP
2006107496 Apr 2006 JP
2006129323 May 2006 JP
2006129327 May 2006 JP
2006190114 Jul 2006 JP
2008071334 Mar 2008 JP
2008516297 May 2008 JP
2008527580 Jul 2008 JP
2008197634 Aug 2008 JP
1020020020262 Mar 2002 KR
WO9720274 Jun 1997 WO
WO9720274 Jun 1997 WO
WO0045588 Aug 2000 WO
WO0045588 Aug 2000 WO
WO0056055 Sep 2000 WO
WO0075840 Dec 2000 WO
WO0142978 Jun 2001 WO
WO0239206 May 2002 WO
WO2004055647 Jul 2004 WO
WO2006078728 Jul 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (255)
Entry
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 24, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 5 pages.
The Japanese Office mailed Oct. 12, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 18, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 4 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374 mailed on Oct. 16, 2012, Ryan et al, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Oct. 5, 2012, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 29 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Nov. 23, 2012, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 15 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 13, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 7 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Dec. 14, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 8 pages.
Beigbeder et al., “An Information Retrieval Model Using the Fuzzy Proximity Degree of Term Occurences”, 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1018-pp. 1022.
Biskup, J., et al, “Towards a Credential-Based Implementation of Compound Access Control Policies” SACMAT '04, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, Jun. 4, 2004, NY, retrieved from the internet: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=990036.990042 (retrieved Nov. 9, 2010.
Breu, M. et al., “The Medoc Distrubuted Electronic Library: Accounting and Security Aspects”, Electronic Publishing, New Models and Opportunities, Proceedings of an ICCC/IFIP Conference, Apr. 14, 1997, pp. 237-249.
Gladney, H. M.: “Access Control for Large Collections”, NY, vol. 15, No. 2, Apr. 1, 1997, pp. 154-194.
Henke, H. “Survey on Electronic Book Features”, Open eBook Forum, online, Mar. 20, 2002, pp. 1-14, retrieved from the Internet: <http://www.openebook.org/doc—library/surveys/IDPF—eBook—Features—2002.pdf> retrieved Nov. 8, 2010.
Navarro, et al., “Modern Information Retrieval, Chapter 8: Indexing and Searching”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, pp. 191-228.
Ziviani, N ED, Baeza-Yates R. et at: “Modern Information Retrieval, Text Operations”, Jan. 1, 1999, Modern Information Retrieval, ACM Press, NY, pp. 163-190.
Zobel, J. et al., “Inverted Files for Text Search Engines” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, No. 2, Jul. 1, 2006, pp. 1-56, NY, NY.
Card et al., “3Book: A 3D Electronic Smart Book”, AVI'04 May 25-28, 2004, Hallipoli, Italy, ACM 2004, pp. 303-pp. 307.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645, 3 pages.
Mercier et al., “Sphere of influence Model in Information retrieval”, IEEE 2005 International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 120-pp. 125.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Jan. 24, 2012, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 22 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 41 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Nov. 25, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items,” 8 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357 , mailed on Dec. 21, 2011, Reztlaff et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Dec. 23, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II et al., “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Dec. 29, 2011, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, dated Dec. 8, 2011, John Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 23 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Feb. 13, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, mailed on Feb. 16, 2012, John Lattyak et al., “Incremental Updates of Items”, 24 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jan. 6, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jan. 28, 2014, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Feb. 10, 2014, Amit D. Agarwal, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 40 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 14, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Feb. 14, 2014, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 14 pages.
“Trilogy Definition”, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1999, 2 pages.
US Pat. Pub. No. 2004081300 dated Apr. 29, 2004, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2002-259718, 14 pages.
US Patent No. 7,340,436 dated Mar. 4, 2008, corresponds to Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-513384, 7 pages.
The Chinese Office Aciton mailed Feb. 1, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 19 pages.
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Jan. 4, 2012, 16 pgs.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Feb. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System ”, 47 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Feb. 21, 2013, Inventor #1, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 76 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Feb. 28, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 17 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 5, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Apr. 8, 2013, Bajaj et al, “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages.
Oki et al., “The Infomation Bus—An Architecture for Extensive Distributed Systems”, ACM, 1993, 11 pages.
Palm Reader Handbook, Palm Inc., 2000, 56 pages.
“Annotation Engine,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <http://cyber.law .harvard. edulproj ects| annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
“Annotator Instructions,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/annotate/instructions.html>>, also found at <<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cite/instructions.html>>, [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
“Annotator Wishlist,” Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School r <http://cyber.law.harvard.edulcite/annotate.cgi ?action=print&markup ;center=; view=http%3A%2F%2Fcy . . . > [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
Roscheisen, M., et al., “Beyond Browsing: Shared Comments, SOAPs, Trails, and On-Line Communities,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27:739-749, 1995.
Canadian Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2009 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 9, 2008 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
The Chinese Second Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
The Chinese Third Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2009 for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680002606.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
Carter, S., et al., “Digital Graffiti: Public Annotation of Multimedia Content,” Proceedings o/the CHI2004, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 24-29, 2004, pp. 1207-1210.
Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 22, 2009, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. EP 06 71 8773.2, filed Jan. 18, 2006.
The European Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
The European Search report mailed Dec. 22, 2009 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed Feb. 23, 2010, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Apr. 5, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-552235, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US/08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page.
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US07/89105, filed Dec. 28, 2007, 2 pages.
International Search Report mailed Aug. 15, 2008, in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US08/57829, filed Mar. 21, 2008, 1 page.
International Search Report mailed Jul. 7, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/57848, filed Mar. 31, 2008, 2 pages.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US 08/64389, mailed on Jan. 28, 2009, 7 pgs.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2006/001752, mailed on Jul. 27, 2006, 8 pgs.
“Say NO to Third Voice,” Worldzone.net, 1999-2004, <http://worldzone.netiinternetipixelsnttv/index.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
“The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School: Annotation Engine,” Harvard.Edu, 1999-2004, <http://cyber.iaw.harvard.eduJprojects/annotate.html> [Retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
Marshall, C.C., “The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World,” Proceedings o/the 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, 11, Mar. 22-24, 1998, pp. 1-19.
Kumar, A., “Third Voice Trails off . . . ,” Wired News, 2004, <http://www.wired.com|news/printIO. 1294,42803 ,00.html> [retrieved Jan. 30, 2004].
The Chinese Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5 , a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 13 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,131,647, 7 pages.
Homer, et al., “Instant HTML”, Wrox Press, 1997, pp. 76-79.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Mar. 10, 2014, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 42 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 14, 2014, Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 13 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Mar. 24, 2014, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 26 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on Mar. 27, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 14 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Apr. 25, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on May 2, 2014, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, Tom Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Mar. 30, 2012, Scott Dixon et al., “Bundled Digital Content”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Apr. 23, 2012, Siegel et al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Apr. 26, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on May 4, 2012, Hilliard B. Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 20 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed May 9, 2012, Thomas Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages.
Goodreads.com, “About goodreads”, 2006, 2 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Feb. 14, 2013, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 47 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Apr. 22, 2013, Ryan et al., “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on May 14, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 24 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on May 2, 2013,Ryan et al., “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Jun. 4, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 26 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Jun. 6, 2013, Reztlaff, II et al., “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 27 pages.
International Search Report mailed Sep. 9, 2008, in International Application No. PCT/US08/64387, filed May 21, 2008, 1 page.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013 for Chinese patent application No 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 8 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2013 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 6 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed May 24, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501124, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-509529, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 5 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Jul. 3, 2013, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 14 pages.
Canadian Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012 for Canadian patent application No. 2594573, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. 8,131,647, 5 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 17, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 5 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed May 21, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
Final Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Mar. 16, 2010, 16 pgs.
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Jan. 19, 2010, 31 pgs.
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 15, 2009, 31 pgs.
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, mailed on Aug. 6, 2010, 17 pgs.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 7 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Jun. 27, 2012, Ryan et al., “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System ”, 47 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jun. 6, 2012, James. R. Retzlaff II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369 mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 20 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2012 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 17 pages.
BarnesandNoble.com, “Barnes and Noble Homepage”, retrieved on Aug. 2, 2011 http://web.archive.org/web/19981202183957/http://www.barnesandnoble.com/, Dec. 2, 1998.
Cavanaugh, “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 35, No. 2, Copyright 2002 CEC, 6 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 14, 2011 for Japanese patent application No. 20078004873.9, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 6 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880024964.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, mailed on Oct. 5, 2011, Killalea et al., “Aggregation of Highlights”, 75 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Aug. 4, 2011, Agarwal et al., “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 39 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 19, 2011, Thomas A. Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages.
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, mailed on Aug. 26, 2011, James R. Rezlaff II, “Search Results Generation and Sorting”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, mailed on Sep. 12, 2011, James R. Retzlaff II, “Managing Status of Search Index Generation”, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, mailed on Sep. 26, 2011, Michael Rykov, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples”, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Sep. 27, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 17 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, mailed on Oct. 30, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 14 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
“Mastering to Become a True Manager, Well-selected commands for an efficient event log management, Part 1,” Windows Server World, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86-96, IDG Japan, Japan, Feb. 1, 2004.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Dec. 17, 2013, James R. Retzlaff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 25 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on Dec. 24, 2013, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 16 pages.
The European Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 20010 for European Patent Application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/039,645.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, mailed on May 26, 2011, Reztlaff, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Jun. 13, 2011, Craig S. Griffin, “Display Dependent Markup Language”.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Jun. 9, 2011, Hilliard B. Siegel, “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, Zagorie et al., “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices”, 22 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017259.X, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 7 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880017589.9, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 9 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2011 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, mailed on Oct. 14, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 38 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, mailed on Oct. 24, 2011, Bajaj et al., “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/759,828, mailed on Nov. 10, 2011, James R. Retzalff II, “Search and Indexing on a User Device”, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Nov. 8, 2011, Thomas Ryan, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System”, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/277,894, filed Mar. 29, 2006, Jateen P. Parekh, Gregg E. Zehr, and Subram Narasimhan,“Reader Device Content Indexing”.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, filed Sep. 29, 2006, Thomas Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, filed Sep. 29, 2006, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item based on a Catalog Presentation of Items.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, filed Mar. 29, 2007, John Lattyak; John Kim; Steven Moy; Laurent An Minh Nguyen, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Craig Griffin; Steven Weiss, “Display Dependent Markup Language.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,339, filed Jun. 14, 2007, David Isbister; Marshall Willilams; Nicholas Vaccaro, “Power Management Techniques for a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,357, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; John Lattyak, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,363, filed Jun. 14, 2007, James Reztlaff II; Thomas Ryan, “Search Results Generation and Sorting.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,375, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak, Girish Bansil Bajaj, Kevin R. Cheung, Thomas Fruchterman, Robert L. Goodwin, Kenneth P. Kiraly, Richard Moore, Subram Narasimhan, Thomas A. Ryan, Michael V. Rykov, Jon Saxton, James C. Slezak, Beryl Tomay, Aviram Zagorie, Gregg Elliott Zehr, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Kenneth Kiraly; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; Xiaotian Guo, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,381, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Selecting and Providing Items in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,390, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Girish Bansilal Bajaj; Michael Rykov; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin “Providing User-Supplied Items to a User Device.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,392, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Subram Narasimhan; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System .”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,393, filed Jun. 14, 2007, John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin “Incremental Updates of Items .”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, filed Jun. 14, 2007, Thomas Ryan; Gregg Zehr; Kenneth Kiraly; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov; Girish Bansilal Bajaj; James Slezak; Aviram Zagorie; Richard Moore; Kevin Cheung; Thomas Fruchterman; Robert Goodwin; James Reztlaff II, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System.”
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,618, filed Dec. 21, 2007, Michael Rykov; Laurent An Minh Nguyen; Steven Moy, “Dissemination of Periodical Samples.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/333,215, filed Dec. 11, 2008, Aviram Zagorie; Craig Griffin; John Lattyak; Michael Rykov, “Device-Specific Presentation Control for Electronic Book Reader Devices.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,629, filed Jan. 9, 2009, John Johnston; Weiping Dou; Steven Chase, “Antenna Placement on Portable Device .”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,663, filed Jan. 9, 2009, Chris Li; Steven Chase, “Surface Mount Clip for Routing and Grounding Cables.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,089, filed Jan. 26, 2009, Thomas Dimson, Janna Hamaker, Eugene Kalenkovich, Tom Killalea, “Aggregation of Highlights.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Rajiv Kotesh Ghanta; Marcos Frid; Joseph J. Hebenstreit; John T. Kim, “Electronic Device With Haptic Feedback.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, filed Feb. 6, 2009, Scott Dixon; Eriel Thomas, “Bundled Digital Content.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, filed Mar. 31, 2009, Amit Agarwal; Zaur Kambarov; Tom Killalea, “Questions on Highlighted Passages.”
U.S. Appl. No. 29/331,528, filed Jan. 27, 2009, Chris Green, “User Interface Cluster.”
“A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.iett.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf.
Bellwood, et al., “UDDI Version 2.04 API Specification UDDI Committee Specification, Jul. 19, 2002”, Oasis, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20050314033213/www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/tcspecs.htm.
Bradley, “Plastic Shape Shifter”, retreived on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.reactivereports.com/61/61—3.html>>, Chemistry WebMagazine, Issue No. 61, Dec. 2006, 2 pgs.
Cafesoft.com, “Security Glossary”, dated Oct. 13, 2003, retrieved from the Wayback Machine on Jul. 2, 2009 at <<http://web.archive.org/web/20031013022218/http://cafesoft.com/support/security-glossary.html>>.
Cavanaugh “EBooks and Accommodations”, Teaching Expectional Children vol. 35 No. 2 p. 56-61 Copyright 2002 CEC.
Chi et al. “eBooks with Indexes that Reorganize Conceptually”, CHI2004, Apr. 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria ACM 1-58113-703-6/04/0004.
Cleveland, Jr. et al., “Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 56, Fourth Edition, Aug. 1999, 38 pages.
Cleveland, Jr., et al, “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields” OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, Aug. 1997, 84 pages.
Davison et al. “The Use of eBooks and Interactive Multimedia, as Alternative Forms of Technical Documentation” SIGDOC'05, Sep. 21-23, 2005, Conventry, United Kingdom, Copyright 2005 ACM 1-59593-175-9/05/0009.
Desmoulins et al., “Pattern-Based Annotations on E-books: From Personal to Shared Didactic Content”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless adn Mobile Techniques in Education, 2002, 4 pages.
Elspass, et al., “Portable Haptic Interface with Active Functional Design”, In Proceedings SPIE Conference on Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, Newport Beach, California, vol. 3668, Mar. 1999, 926-932.
“Haptic History—Machine Haptics (Expansion)” retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://hapticshistory.chc61.uci.cu/haptic/site/pages/Machine-Haptics-Became—5.php.>> from Google's cache, text-only version as webpage appeared on Apr. 16, 2009, 8 pgs.
Jones, et al., “Development of a Tactile Vest”, IEEE Computer Society, in the Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Mar. 27-28, 2004, pp. 82-89.
Leach et al, “A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace”, Jul. 2005, IETF, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 at http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc4122.pdf, 32 pgs.
Leutwyler, “Shape-shifting Polymer Gels”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shape-shifting-polymer-ge&print=true>>, Scientific American, Nov. 9, 2000, 1 pg.
Means, et al., “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields”, OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01, Jun. 2001, 57 pages.
Nakatani, et al., “3D Form Display with Shape Memory Alloy”, In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Reality and Teleexistence (ICAT), 2003, pp. 179-184.
OQO “A full PC That Fits in Your Pocket” Retrieved on Sep. 22, 2008 at <<http://www.oqo.com/support/documentation.html>>.
PCT Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US10/22060, mailed Mar. 8, 2010 (7 pages).
“Shape Memory Polymer”, retrieved on May 7, 2009 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape—Memory—Polymer>>, Wikipedia, 8 pgs.
Sohn et al. “Development of a Standard Format for eBooks”, SAC2002, Madrid, Spain, 2002 ACM 1-58113-445-2/02/0.
“Universal Unique Identifier”, dated Dec. 16, 2002. The Open Group, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/20021216070918/http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9629399/apdxa.htm.
“Web Services Architecture: W3C Working Group Note Feb. 11, 2004”, W3C, all pages. Retrieved on Apr. 21, 2010 via Wayback Machine at http://web.archive.org/web/2004040205185/http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/.
Wellman, et al., “Mechanical Design and Control of a High-Bandwidth Shape Memory Alloy Tactile Display”, Springer-Verlag, In the Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 1997, pp. 56-66, 12 pgs.
Yoshikawa, et al., “Vertical Drive Micro Actuator for Haptic Display Using Shape Memory Alloy Thin Film”, IEE Japan, Papers of Technical Meeting on Micromachine and Sensor System, Journal Code L2898B, vol. MSS-05, No. 21-44, 2005, pp. 103-108.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, mailed on Aug. 15, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”, 24 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2013 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 7,865,817, 4 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,386, mailed on Oct. 16, 2013, Ryan et al., “Handling of Subscription-Related Issues in a Media Consumption System”,18 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Oct. 8, 2013, “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,376, mailed on Aug. 19, 2013, Kiraly et al., “Notification of a User Device to Perform an Action ”, 16 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,484, mailed on Aug. 27, 2013, Ryan, “Expedited Acquisition of a Digital Item Following a Sample Presentation of the Item”, 13 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,914, mailed on Sep. 13, 2013, Agarwal et al, “Questions on Highlighted Passages”, 35 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, mailed on Sep. 16, 2013, James R. Reztlaff II et al., “Search of Multiple Content Sources on a User Device”, 23 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,803, mailed on Sep. 24, 2013, John Lattyak, “Progress Indication for a Digital Work”, 27 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Sep. 5, 2013, Lattyak et al., “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 6 pages.
Canadian Office Action mailed May 29, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684580, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 3 pages.
Canadian Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2684955, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, 3 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 16, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 200880025056.5, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 18 pages.
The Chinese Office Action mailed Jun. 5, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080006308.7, a counterpart foreign application of US patent No. 8,378,979, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, mailed on May 14, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Consumption of Items via a User Device”, 21 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Jun. 2, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 24 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Jun. 24, 2014, Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 19 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/943,211, mailed on Jul. 2, 2014, Retzlaff, II et al., “Obtaining and Verifying Search Indices”, 9 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,314, mailed on Aug. 28, 2014, Griffin et al., “Display Dependent Markup Language”, 52 pages.
European Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. 08732668.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages.
Malloy, et al. “Google Search”, retrieved on Sep. 17, 2014 at <<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Google—Search&oldid=118323867>>, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Mar. 27, 2007, 6 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2011-548210, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/360,744, 4 pages.
The Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,961, mailed on Oct. 10, 2014, John Lattyak, “Delivery of Items for Consumption by a User Device”, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,446, mailed on Oct. 31, 2014, Linsey R. Hansen, “Indicators for Navigating Digital Works”, 17 pages.
Office Action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Oct. 6, 2014, Lattyak et al., “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device ”, 16 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,682, mailed on Oct. 7, 2014, Siegelet al., “Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 12 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,445, mailed on Sep. 24, 2014, Siegel et al., “Method and System for Providing Annotations of a Digital Work”, 31 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Sep. 4, 2014, Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 10 pages.
Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024279, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 6 pages.
Barnes & Noble, “Nook User Guide”, retrieved from the internet Feb. 5, 2013, 120 pgs.
Canadian Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2014 for Canadian patent application No. 2681754, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 5 pages.
Mintues of the Oral Proceedings mailed on Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 13 pages.
European Office Action mailed Nov. 27, 2014 for European patent application No. 06718773.2, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,647, 31 pages.
Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 16, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2009-544304, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,677, 2 pages.
Kindle Community, Discussions—Screen Saver, retrieved from the internet on Nov. 6, 2009 at <<http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum?cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=Tx28QGUBE29L22J>>, 4 pages.
“Kobo Wireless eReader & Desktop Application User Guide”, Feb. 2011, 170 pgs.
Korean Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2014 for Korean patent application No. 10-2009-7024280, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,374, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/366,941, mailed on Jan. 6, 2015, Scott Dixon, “Bundled Digital Content”, 15 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Jan. 9, 2015, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”, 13 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Jan. 15, 2015, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 45 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,378, mailed on Feb. 5, 2015, John Lattyak, “Transfer of Instructions to a User Device”, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Nov. 6, 2014, Thomas A. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 29 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,395, Thomas Ryan, “Providing Supplemental Information Based on Hints in a Media Consumption System ”, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/179,380, mailed on Dec. 19, 2014, Girish Bansilal Bajaj, “Providing User Supplied Items to a User Device”, 11 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Feb. 21, 2014, Gilles Jean Roger Belin, “Cover Display”, 36 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Feb. 25, 2014, Sailesh Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Mar. 15, 2013, Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readern”, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/537,518, mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, John Lattyak, “Acquisition of an Item Based on a Catalog Presentation of Items”.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Jul. 25, 2013, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/693,685, John Lattyak, “Relative Progress and Event Indicators”.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/070,328, mailed on Aug. 12, 2014, Rachabathuni, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Readers”, 6 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on 8/13/14, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 40 pages.
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/886,877, mailed on Sep. 11, 2013, Belin et al., “Cover Display”, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/567,984, mailed on Sep. 27, 2012, John T. Kim, “Last Screen Rendering for Electronic Book Reader”, 9 pages.
Canadian Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2688002, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,358, 5 pages.
Japanese Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2010-501125, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,369, 19 pages.
Canadian Office Action mailed Feb. 11, 2015 for Canadian patent application No. 2681755, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,349, 4 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/959,589, mailed on Feb. 26, 2015, Thomas a. Ryan, “Administrative Tasks in a Media Consumption System”, 45 pages.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60882870 Dec 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11693677 Mar 2007 US
Child 12949115 US