The present invention relates to a lithographic apparatus and a method for manufacturing a device.
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a substrate, usually onto a target portion of the substrate. A lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In that instance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern to be formed on an individual layer of the IC. This pattern can be transferred onto a target portion (e.g. comprising part of, one, or several dies) on a substrate (e.g. a silicon wafer). Transfer of the pattern is typically via imaging onto a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist) provided on the substrate. In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively patterned. Known lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at one time, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through a radiation beam in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. It is also possible to transfer the pattern from the patterning device to the substrate by imprinting the pattern onto the substrate.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in the lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill a space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features since the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system and also increasing the depth of focus.) Other immersion liquids have been proposed, including water with solid particles (e.g. quartz) suspended therein.
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate using a liquid confinement system (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application publication WO 99/49504. As illustrated in
A further immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system is shown in
Another immersion lithography solution with a localized liquid supply system solution which has been proposed is to provide the liquid supply system with a barrier member which extends along at least a part of a boundary of the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate table. Such a solution is illustrated in
The barrier member 12 at least partly contains liquid in the space 11 between a final element of the projection system PL and the substrate W. A contactless seal 16 to the substrate may be formed around the image field of the projection system so that liquid is confined within the space between the substrate surface and the final element of the projection system. The space is at least partly formed by the barrier member 12 positioned below and surrounding the final element of the projection system PL. Liquid is brought into the space below the projection system and within the barrier member 12 by liquid inlet 13 and may be removed by liquid outlet 13. The barrier member 12 may extend a little above the final element of the projection system and the liquid level rises above the final element so that a buffer of liquid is provided. The barrier member 12 has an inner periphery that at the upper end, in an embodiment, closely conforms to the shape of the projection system or the final element thereof and may, e.g., be round. At the bottom, the inner periphery closely conforms to the shape of the image field, e.g., rectangular though this need not be the case.
The liquid is contained in the space 11 by a gas seal 16 which, during use, is formed between the bottom of the barrier member 12 and the surface of the substrate W. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air or synthetic air but, in an embodiment, N2 or another inert gas, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between barrier member 12 and substrate and extracted via outlet 14. The overpressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level on the outlet 14 and geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwards that confines the liquid. Those inlets/outlets may be annular grooves which surround the space 11 and the flow of gas 16 is effective to contain the liquid in the space 11. Such a system is disclosed in United States patent application publication no. US 2004-0207824, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.
In European patent application publication no. EP 1420300 and United States patent application publication no. US 2004-0136494, each hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference, the idea of a twin or dual stage immersion lithography apparatus is disclosed. Such an apparatus is provided with two tables for supporting a substrate. Leveling measurements are carried out with a table at a first position, without immersion liquid, and exposure is carried out with a table at a second position, where immersion liquid is present. Alternatively, the apparatus has only one table.
A possible downside of immersion lithography is reduced throughput due to liquid handling issues.
It is desirable, for example, to provide a lithographic projection apparatus and device manufacturing method using immersion lithography in which one or more measures are taken to increase throughput.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a projection system;
a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system; and
a liquid supply system configured to provide a space between the projection system and the substrate with liquid, at least a part of the liquid supply system being moveable relative to and independent of the projection system and the substrate in at least one direction which is substantially parallel to a top surface of the substrate.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a projection system;
a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system; and
a liquid supply system comprising a barrier member, surrounding the projection system, configured to at least partly contain liquid in a volume including a space between the projection system and the substrate,
wherein the barrier member is configured to be moveable independently of the substrate in a first direction in a plane substantially parallel to a top surface of the substrate, and
wherein the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable in the first direction by at least a distance equal to a slit height of the lithographic apparatus.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising:
a projection system;
a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system;
a liquid supply system configured to provide a space between the projection system and the substrate with liquid; and
a force decoupling member, positioned around the projection system and, in use, in the liquid, to at least reduce transfer of forces from the liquid supply system to the projection system through the liquid.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method, comprising:
providing a liquid between a projection system and a substrate using a liquid supply system, part of which forms a seal between it and the substrate;
using the projection system to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate;
moving the substrate under the projection system; and
during moving of the substrate, moving the part of the liquid supply system in a direction and at a speed to reduce the relative velocity between the substrate and the part.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
The illumination system may include various types of optical components, such as refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic, electrostatic or other types of optical components, or any combination thereof, for directing, shaping, or controlling radiation.
The support structure supports, i.e. bears the weight of, the patterning device. It holds the patterning device in a manner that depends on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as for example whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support structure can use mechanical, vacuum, electrostatic or other clamping techniques to hold the patterning device. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required. The support structure may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a radiation beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the radiation beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate, for example if the pattern includes phase-shifting features or so called assist features. Generally, the pattern imparted to the radiation beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
The patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions. The tilted mirrors impart a pattern in a radiation beam which is reflected by the mirror matrix.
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion liquid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system”.
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g. employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above, or employing a reflective mask).
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposure.
Referring to
The illuminator IL may comprise an adjuster AD for adjusting the angular intensity distribution of the radiation beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL may comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator may be used to condition the radiation beam, to have a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
The radiation beam B is incident on the patterning device (e.g., mask) MA, which is held on the support structure (e.g., mask table) MT, and is patterned by the patterning device. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the radiation beam B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioner PW and position sensor IF (e.g. an interferometric device, linear encoder or capacitive sensor), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the radiation beam B. Similarly, the first positioner PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus could be used in at least one of the following modes:
1. In step mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C at one time (i.e. a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C (i.e. a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT may be determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PS. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the radiation beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations on the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
One or more embodiments of the present invention are applicable to all types of liquid supply system which have a speed at which the liquid may no longer be contained sufficiently. In particular those types which contain the liquid in a volume above the substrate and which at least partly rely on capillary forces and/or an underpressure and/or gas pressure and/or hydrodynamic forces and/or friction between the liquid and the substrate, etc. to help ensure that liquid does not escape that volume. Examples of such liquid supply systems are illustrated in
Various types of liquid supply system attempt to create a seal between a part of the liquid supply system and a substrate. Movement of the substrate relative to that part of the liquid supply system may lead to breakdown of the seal and thereby cause leaking of liquid. In an embodiment of the present invention, one or more measures are taken to reduce the relative velocity between that part of the liquid supply system and the substrate W during imaging. In this way the scanning speed of the substrate W at which the seal may break down is increased so as to allow faster movement of the substrate W under the projection system and thereby possibly increase throughput.
As illustrated in
A function of the barrier member 12 is to at least partly maintain or confine liquid in the space between the projection system PL and the substrate W so that the projection beam may pass through the liquid. The top level of liquid is simply contained by the presence of the barrier member and the level of liquid in the space is maintained such that the liquid does not overflow over the top of the barrier member 12. In an embodiment, a seal is provided between the bottom of the barrier member 12 and the substrate W. In
Radially outwardly of the outlet 60 is an extractor assembly 70 configured to extract liquid from between the barrier member 12 and the substrate W. The extractor 70 will be described in more detail below and is configured to form, in part, the contactless seal which is created between the barrier member 12 and the substrate W.
Radially outwardly of the extractor assembly is a recess 80 which is connected through an inlet 82 to the atmosphere and via an outlet 84 to a low pressure source. Radially outwardly of the recess 80 is a gas knife 90. An arrangement of the extractor, recess and gas knife is disclosed in detail in U.S. patent application 60/643,626, filed Jan. 14, 2005, incorporated herein its entirety by reference. However, in that application the arrangement of the extractor assembly is different.
The extractor assembly 70 is comprised of a liquid removal device or extractor or inlet 100 such as the one disclosed in United States patent application publication US 2006-0038968, incorporated herein its entirety by reference. Any type of liquid extractor may be used. In an embodiment, the liquid removal device 100 comprises an inlet which is covered in a porous material 110 which is used to separate liquid from gas to enable single-liquid phase liquid extraction. A chamber 120 downstream of the porous material 110 is maintained at a slight under pressure and is filled with liquid. The under pressure in the chamber 120 is such that the meniscuses formed in the holes of the porous material prevent ambient gas being drawn into the chamber 120 of the liquid removal device 100. However, when the porous surface 110 comes into contact with liquid there is no meniscus to restrict flow and the liquid can flow freely into the chamber 120 of the liquid removal device 100. The porous surface 110 extends radially inwardly along the barrier member 12 (as well as around the space) and its rate of extraction varies according to how much of the porous material 110 is covered by liquid.
Control of the meniscus of liquid between the barrier member 12 and the substrate W is significant. During scanning of the substrate W (during which the substrate moves under the barrier member 12 and projection system PL) the meniscus may be drawn either towards or away from the optical axis by a drag force applied by the moving substrate W. This may lead to liquid loss which may result in evaporation of the liquid and thereby possible cooling of the substrate and consequent shrinkage and overlay errors. Additionally or alternatively, liquid stains may be left behind from interaction between the liquid droplets and resist photochemistry. Additionally or alternatively, inclusion of gas into the space between the projection system PL and the substrate W may be a problem which may lead to bubbles and deterioration in the quality of the projected image when the meniscus is dragged into the space.
In an embodiment, a plate 200 is provided between the liquid removal device 100 and the substrate W so that the function of liquid extraction and the function of meniscus control may be separated from one another and the barrier member 12 may be optimized for each.
The plate 200 is a divider or any other element which has the function of splitting the space between the liquid removal device 100 and the substrate W into two channels, an upper channel 220 and a lower channel 230 wherein the upper channel 220 is between the upper surface of the plate 200 and the liquid removal device 100 and the lower channel 230 is between the lower surface of the plate 200 and the substrate W. Each channel is open, at its radially innermost end, to the space. The thickness of the plate is not critical. Although as illustrated in
In an embodiment, the upper channel 220 between the liquid removal device 100 and the plate 200 is narrower than the lower channel 230 between the plate 200 and the substrate W. In an embodiment, the lower channel is between 250 mm and 50 μm high, or between 100 and 60 μm depending on design (viscous drag length from flow pattern), fluid parameters (viscosity, density, surface tension) and surface properties (contact angle resulting from binding energy surface/liquid and liquid surface tension). The upper channel 220 has a stronger capillary action, for instance by making it 2 to 3 times narrower than the lower channel 230. Alternatively or additionally, the upper channel 220 may be made with a surface which is more liquidphilic than the lower channel 230. The upper channel 220 may also be wider than the lower channel 230. If the upper channel 220 is too narrow, liquid may not flow in that channel because the frictional resistance is too large and the meniscus in that channel is fully loaded with hydrodynamic forces. Thus, if the upper channel 220 is made wider, for example in the region of 150 μm, than the lower channel 230 which could be perhaps 60 μm, these difficulties may be overcome. Above a channel width of 250 μm the capillary action is reduced. In order to promote capillary action, the upper channel 220 could be made liquidphilic or a height step close to the meniscus in the upper channel 220 may be made such that the channel radially inwardly is wider than radially outwardly.
An under pressure may be applied in the upper channel 220, rather than leaving it open to the atmosphere through breathing holes 250 e.g. through holes 250. In this way the upper channel 220 may be made wider.
In this way there are two meniscuses 310, 320. A first meniscus 310 is positioned above the plate 200 and extends between the porous surface 110 and the top surface of the plate 200 and a second meniscus 320 which is positioned underneath the plate 200 and which extends between the plate 200 and the substrate W. In this way the extractor assembly 70 may be optimized to control the first meniscus 310 for optimum extraction of liquid and to control the position of the second meniscus 320 such that the viscous drag length for the second meniscus 320 is reduced. In particular, characteristics, such as of the plate 200, may be optimized to make it energetically favorable for the second meniscus 320 to remain adhered to the plate 200 such that the scan speed of the substrate W beneath the barrier member 10 may be increased. Capillary forces acting on the second meniscus 320 are outwards and are balanced by an under pressure in the liquid adjacent the meniscus so that the meniscus stays still. Higher loading on the meniscus, for example by viscous drag and inertia, may result in a lowering of the contact angle of the meniscus with the surface.
In
In
An alternative or additional way of pinning the second meniscus 320 is to change the surface properties of the surface of the plate 200 to which the second meniscus 320 adheres. For example, a change from a liquidphilic to a liquidphobic surface in a radially outward direction on the plate 200 could also result in substantial pinning of the meniscus 320 at that change because the shape of the meniscus will need to invert for it to pass from the liquidphilic to the liquidphobic surface. Another or additional way to pin the meniscus is to change the surface of the plate 200 from a rough surface to a smooth surface. When fully wetted the rough surface can act as a meniscus trap. If the surface is not fully wetted and the liquid is only on the peaks of the roughness, a rough surface can act liquidphobic such as in the so called lotus effect. Additionally or alternatively, electro wetting could be used to locally trap the meniscus, which has an advantage in that it can be turned on and off.
Also illustrated in
Although not specifically illustrated in
In an embodiment, it is possible to regulate the supply of liquid into the space between the final element of the projection system PL and substrate W, for example, through outlet 20, depending on the relative direction of movement of the barrier member 12 relative to the projection system PL. Thus active control of the supply of liquid by the liquid supply system into the space is possible depending on the movement of the barrier member 12 relative to the projection system PL. Thus, for example, when the barrier member 12 is moving towards the projection system PL from a first side to a second side the active control of the liquid control system would provide more liquid from the side of the barrier member closer to the second side than from a part of the barrier member closer to the first side. The active control could be implemented by way of piezoelectric actuated inlet nozzles, or concentric rings moveable with respect to each other with a flow path between the inside edge of the outer ring and the outside edge of the inner ring, etc.
As illustrated in
With regard to movement in the step direction, it might be suitable to allow movement in that direction by at least a distance equal to the slit height or perhaps the slit width. A step is approximately 25 mm in width and acceleration of approximately 26 mm is typically used beforehand in order to stabilize the substrate table and deceleration of approximately 26 mm is typically used afterwards. Thus the amount of movement possible in the second (step) direction should be a reasonable fraction of that distance, for example 20%, 30%, 40% or 50% of the step travel distance.
The barrier member 12 may move either passively (for example against a spring force) or actively by use of an actuator 1000 for movement in one direction (scanning) and a second actuator 2000 for movement in the direction orthogonal to the scanning direction.
When the substrate W moves to the right hand side as illustrated in
In practice the barrier member may move at any speed or direction which reduces the relative velocity between the sealing surface of the plate 200 and the substrate W. During scanning in order to prevent cumulative movement in a certain direction the barrier member 12 is only moved during the fast movements of the substrate W and may then be brought back gradually to a centered position during slower movement or during periods where there is no movement. Thus, during Y scans the barrier member 12 may simply move up and down during the meandering and during X steps the barrier member 12 may move with the substrate. During the Y scans the barrier member 12 may move back to its original position to prevent accumulative movement in the X direction.
The movement of the barrier member 12 may be either active or passive. In the case of an active barrier member 12, a control system is provided which interacts with data from the overall controller of the lithographic apparatus to co-ordinate movements of the barrier member 12 with movements of the substrate W. The barrier member 12 may be actuated by, for example a piezo electric actuator, a linear motor, etc. In an embodiment in which the barrier member 12 is moved passively, the barrier member 12 may be attached to the base frame BF, reference frame RF or projection system PL by one or more springs positioning it in the X-Y direction. Friction through the liquid between the moveable plate 200 and the substrate W should provide enough force for the barrier member 12 to be moved in the same direction as the substrate W. By adding a Iiquidphobic coating at an edge of the plate 200, the force exerted on the plate by the substrate W through the liquid may be increased. The strength of the spring(s) is chosen such that the barrier member 12 moves only during step movements of high speed.
The barrier member is described as being rectangular in the description of the embodiment of
For small fields (e.g. 10 mm long), the speed in the scan direction may become smaller than in the step direction. The same applies for a required stroke, it depends upon the use to which the apparatus is being put.
In order to increase modularity, identical actuators may be used for movement of the barrier member 12 in the scanning and step directions and they may have the same stroke.
In an alternative embodiment the plate 200 is dispensed with i.e. one or more embodiments of the invention work just as well with different constructions of barrier member.
In all embodiments, the controller may also predict likely movements required by the sealing surface in the future because it has the data regarding the movement which the substrate will undergo during exposure. Thus, it may, during slow movement of the substrate relative to the projection system, move the barrier member close to an extreme position (or back to a central position) so as to increase or maximize the available movement of the barrier member for a future high speed movement of the substrate relative to the projection system.
In an embodiment, the plate 200 is translatable relative to the barrier member 12 in a plane substantially parallel to the substrate W. In this embodiment, the barrier member 12 itself is not substantially moved relative to the projection system PL during scanning of the substrate but it is the plate 200 which is moved (e.g. as described above in relation to
When the substrate moves to the right hand side as illustrated in
In practice the plate may move at any speed which reduces the relative velocity between the sealing surface of the plate 200 and the substrate W. During scanning in order to prevent cumulative movement in a certain direction the plate is only moved during the fast movements of the substrate W and may then be brought back gradually to a centered position during slower movement or during periods where there is no movement. Thus, during Y scans the plate may simply move up and down during the meandering and during X steps the plate may move with the substrate. During the Y scans the plate may move back to its original position to prevent accumulative movement in the X direction.
The movement of the plate may be either active or passive. In the case of an active plate a control system is provided which interacts with data from the overall controller of the lithographic apparatus to co-ordinate movements of the plate 200 with movements of the substrate W. The plate 200 may be actuated by, for example a piezo electric actuator, a linear motor, etc. In an embodiment in which the plate is moved passively, the plate may be attached to the barrier member 10 by a spring positioning it in the X-Y direction. Friction through the liquid between the moveable plate 200 and the substrate W will provide enough force for the plate 200 to be moved in the same direction as the substrate W. By adding a liquidphobic coating at an edge of the plate 200, the force exerted on the plate by the substrate W through the liquid may be increased. The strength of the spring may be chosen such that the plate moves only during step movements of high speed.
Thus, as can be seen, by moving a part of the liquid supply system relative to the projection system and independently of the substrate but in the same direction of the substrate during fast movement of the substrate, the speed of movement of the substrate may be increased before liquid leaks from the liquid supply system. In particular the part which is moved is the part to which one end of the meniscus 320, which extends from the substrate W and the liquid supply system, is attached. Thus, although an embodiment of the invention has been described in relation to moving the whole of the barrier member 12 or the plate 200 relative to the projection system PL there may be other designs of liquid supply system in which a different part or member of the liquid supply system may be moved relative to the projection system PL to achieve the same effect as described above. As described above, an embodiment of the invention has been described above in relation to two particular types of barrier member liquid supply systems. There are other liquid supply systems to which an embodiment of the present invention may also be applied e.g. barrier member solutions without a plate 200 and/or with a gas knife to contain the liquid.
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, flat-panel displays, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion”, respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist), a metrology tool and/or an inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
Although specific reference may have been made above to the use of embodiments of the invention in the context of optical lithography, it will be appreciated that the invention may be used in other applications, for example imprint lithography, and where the context allows, is not limited to optical lithography. In imprint lithography a topography in a patterning device defines the pattern created on a substrate. The topography of the patterning device may be pressed into a layer of resist supplied to the substrate whereupon the resist is cured by applying electromagnetic radiation, heat, pressure or a combination thereof. The patterning device is moved out of the resist leaving a pattern in it after the resist is cured.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g. having a wavelength of or about 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
The term “lens”, where the context allows, may refer to any one or combination of various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical components.
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising: a projection system; a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system; and a liquid supply system configured to provide a space between the projection system and the substrate with liquid, at least a part of the liquid supply system being moveable relative to and independent of the projection system and the substrate in at least one direction which is substantially parallel to a top surface of the substrate.
In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises an actuator configured to move the at least a part of the liquid supply system in the at least one direction. In an embodiment, in use, a boundary of the liquid extends between the substrate and the at least a part of the liquid supply system. In an embodiment, the boundary is a meniscus. In an embodiment, the liquid supply system comprises a gas knife configured to seal between the liquid supply system and substrate to at least partly contain liquid in the space. In an embodiment, the liquid supply system is configured to provide liquid to an area of the substrate which is, in plan, smaller than a top surface of the substrate. In an embodiment, in use, movement of the at least a part of the liquid supply system in the at least one direction is effective to move a volume, to which the at least a part of the liquid supply system provides liquid, in the at least one direction. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a substrate table configured to hold the substrate and move it relative to the projection system independent of movement of the at least a part of the liquid supply system. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a positional controller configured to control movement of the at least a part of the liquid supply system such that, during a portion of movement of the substrate relative to the projection system during imaging, the at least a part of the liquid supply system is moved to reduce relative velocity between the at least a part of the liquid supply system and the substrate, while maintaining the space between the projection system and the substrate substantially full of liquid. In an embodiment, the positional controller is configured to control movement of the at least a part of the liquid supply system, during a scanning of the substrate under the projection system in a scanning direction, with a major component in the scanning direction and a minor component in a direction substantially orthogonal to the scanning direction, such that the at least a part of the liquid supply system moves during the scan from a position to one side of the projection system to a position toward the other side of the projection system in a direction substantially orthogonal to the scanning direction. In an embodiment, the positional controller is configured to control movement of the at least a part of the liquid supply system, during a step motion of the substrate under the projection system in a step direction, in the step direction. In an embodiment, the at least a part of the liquid supply system is configured to form a contactless seal between the liquid supply system and the substrate. In an embodiment, the at least a part of the liquid supply system comprises a barrier member configured to surround the space and provide a physical barrier to liquid escaping radially outwardly from an optical axis of the apparatus from the space and wherein, in use, the contactless seal is provided between the barrier member and the substrate. In an embodiment, in use, the contactless seal at least partly relies on a meniscus force of the liquid. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a first actuator configured to move the at least a part of the liquid supply system in a second direction substantially orthogonal to the at least one direction. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a second actuator configured to move the at least a part of the liquid supply system in the at least one direction and wherein the stroke of the second actuator is at least 1½ times the stroke of the first actuator. In an embodiment, the at least a part of the liquid supply system comprises a plate. In an embodiment, the at least a part of the liquid supply system comprises a liquid supply part of the liquid supply system. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a force decoupling member, positioned around the projection system and, in use, in the liquid, to at least reduce transfer of forces from the part of the liquid supply system to the projection system through the liquid. In an embodiment, in use, the force decoupling member is dynamically decoupled from the projection system. In an embodiment, the force decoupling member is attached to a frame to which the projection system is attached or attached to a frame configured to support the substrate.
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising: a projection system; a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system; and a liquid supply system comprising a barrier member, surrounding the projection system, configured to at least partly contain liquid in a volume including a space between the projection system and the substrate, wherein the barrier member is configured to be moveable independently of the substrate in a first direction in a plane substantially parallel to a top surface of the substrate, and wherein the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable in the first direction by at least a distance equal to a slit height of the lithographic apparatus.
In an embodiment, the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable in a second direction substantially orthogonal to the first direction and in a plane substantially parallel to the top surface of the substrate by at least a distance equal to the slit height of the lithographic apparatus. In an embodiment, the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable by more distance in the first direction than it is moveable in a second direction. In an embodiment, the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable in the first direction by a distance of at least 20% of a maximum scan length of the lithographic apparatus. In an embodiment, the barrier member is sized and shaped such that it is moveable in a second direction by a distance of at least 20% of the slit width of the apparatus.
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic apparatus, comprising: a projection system; a table configured to hold a substrate to be imaged by the projection system; a liquid supply system configured to provide a space between the projection system and the substrate with liquid; and a force decoupling member, positioned around the projection system and, in use, in the liquid, to at least reduce transfer of forces from the liquid supply system to the projection system through the liquid. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a base frame configured to support the substrate and wherein the force decoupling member is attached to the base frame.
In an embodiment, there is provided a device manufacturing method, comprising: providing a liquid between a projection system and a substrate using a liquid supply system, part of which forms a seal between it and the substrate; using the projection system to project a patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate; moving the substrate under the projection system; and during moving of the substrate, moving the part of the liquid supply system in a direction and at a speed to reduce the relative velocity between the substrate and the part.
In an embodiment, during scanning movement of the substrate in a scanning direction, the part is moved with a major component in the scanning direction and a minor component in a direction substantially orthogonal to the scanning direction, such that the part moves during the scan from a position to one side of the projection system to a position toward the other side of the projection system in a direction substantially orthogonal to the scanning direction. In an embodiment, during a step motion of the substrate under the projection system in a step direction, the part is moved in the step direction.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. For example, the invention may take the form of a computer program containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or a data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such a computer program stored therein.
One or more embodiments of the invention may be applied to any immersion lithography apparatus, in particular, but not exclusively, those types mentioned above and whether the immersion liquid is provided in the form of a bath or only on a localized surface area of the substrate. A liquid supply system as contemplated herein should be broadly construed. In certain embodiments, it may be a mechanism or combination of structures that provides a liquid to a space between the projection system and the substrate and/or substrate table. It may comprise a combination of one or more structures, one or more liquid inlets, one or more gas inlets, one or more gas outlets, and/or one or more liquid outlets that provide liquid to the space. In an embodiment, a surface of the space may be a portion of the substrate and/or substrate table, or a surface of the space may completely cover a surface of the substrate and/or substrate table, or the space may envelop the substrate and/or substrate table. The liquid supply system may optionally further include one or more elements to control the position, quantity, quality, shape, flow rate or any other features of the liquid.
The immersion liquid used in the apparatus may have different compositions, according to the desired properties and the wavelength of exposure radiation used. For an exposure wavelength of 193 nm, ultra pure water or water-based compositions may be used and for this reason the immersion liquid is sometimes referred to as water and water-related terms such as hydrophilic, hydrophobic, humidity, etc. may be used.
The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the claims set out below.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/831,663, filed Aug. 20, 2015, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/331,003, filed Jul. 14, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,140,996, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/960,947, filed Dec. 6, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,786,823, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/404,091, filed Apr. 14, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,864,292, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/391,683, filed Mar. 29, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,804,577, and of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/274,888, filed Nov. 16, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,656,501, the entire contents of each application is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6809794 | Sewell | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7119881 | Bleeker | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7292313 | Poon et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7468779 | De Graaf et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7656501 | Ottens et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7804577 | Ottens et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7864292 | Leenders et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7936444 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8421996 | Leenders et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8786823 | Leenders et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9140996 | Leenders et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239954 | Bischoff | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030498 | Mulkens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050094125 | Arai | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122505 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050140948 | Tokita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146693 | Ohsaki | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151942 | Kawashima | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050200815 | Akamatsu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213065 | Kitaoka | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213066 | Sumiyoshi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219489 | Nei et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233081 | Tokita | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243292 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060038968 | Kemper et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060098177 | Nagasaka | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119807 | Baselmans et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158627 | Kemper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060290908 | De Graaf et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060290909 | Donders et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070110213 | Leenders et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070263188 | Hara | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101361024 | Feb 2009 | CN |
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224 448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242 880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 420 300 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 477 856 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 489 462 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 420 300 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1 489 462 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1 739 488 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 830 394 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 933 371 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2004-172621 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-343114 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-019864 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-303167 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-237291 | Sep 2006 | JP |
I413867 | Nov 2013 | TW |
9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004105106 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2004107048 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node”, 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography”, TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography”, SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects”, Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
S. Owa et al., “Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues”, SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003. |
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions”, May 15, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity”, Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm”, Future FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2 μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens”, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
G. Owen et al., “1/8 μm Optical Lithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash”, Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography”, NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools”, Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update”, SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts”, EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
International Search Report issued for International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2006/004275, dated Apr. 4, 2007. |
European Office Action for EP Application No. 06 808 564.6 dated Nov. 30, 2009. |
Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-310702 dated Feb. 23, 2010. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 15, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-163625. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2011 in corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 095142513. |
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2011 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-114261. |
Taiwanese Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2011 in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 095142513. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2012 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201110115693.5. |
Japanese Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-124242. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/872,842. |
English translation of PCT/JP2004/007415, filed May 24, 2004. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2014 in corresponding Taiwan Patent Application No. 100122979. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170212432 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14831663 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15483410 | US | |
Parent | 14331003 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 14831663 | US | |
Parent | 12960947 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 14331003 | US | |
Parent | 11404091 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 12960947 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11391683 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11404091 | US | |
Parent | 11274888 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11391683 | US |