This application claims priority of German application No. 10 2006 011 233.4 filed Mar. 10, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a method and a device for optimizing the image display on imaging apparatuses. The method and the device are particularly suited to use in diagnostic or interventional operations.
During a diagnostic or interventional operation, the relevant operation site is recorded by a camera and displayed on a monitor. The monitors in a cardiological or angiographical suite (x-ray method) are usually attached above the table, upon which the patient lies, opposite the cardiologist or radiologist. The monitors are suspended from the ceiling of the operating room for instance.
During the diagnostic or interventional operation, the operating room must be brightly illuminated so that the physician has an optimum view of the patient during the operation and also during preparatory activities, such as preparing a new catheter for instance. However, the bright lighting of the room impairs the perceptibility on the monitor.
An optimum image quality during diagnostic imaging methods is influenced by a wide variety of components and/or parameters. Among these components and/or parameters are the registration and sensor technology (e.g. flat panel detector based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon during cardiology or angiography x-rays), the image processing and also image observation. While a great deal of know-how is invested in the sensor technology and image processing, the image display on the monitor is frequently neglected.
The object of the present invention is to provide a method and a device for optimizing the image display on imaging apparatuses, which optimize the image display on the imaging apparatus in a suitable manner.
This object is achieved by the method and the device having the features of the independent claims. Advantageous developments are defined in the subclaims.
With the method according to the invention for optimizing the image display on imaging apparatuses, a gradual dimming of the room lighting is preferably advantageously achieved according to a first variant in that the operator and/or the eye of the operator is registered/monitored by means of a camera in order to determine whether or not the operator is looking at the imaging apparatus. In particular, the operator's eye movements and thus his/her gaze into the camera can be detected. As soon as the operator views the monitor during a diagnostic or interventional examination, the room lighting is preferably dimmed slightly. Said dimming indirectly improves the contrast on the monitor. An eye and/or pupil detection software is preferably able to detect at any time whether the operator is looking at the monitor. The room lighting and/or the light which particularly influences the contrast of the monitor is dimmed by means of this information for instance.
Advantageously the operating room is not constantly illuminated brightly during the diagnostic or interventional operation, but rather as a function of whether the operator is observing the monitor, e.g. while x-raying, or is on the other hand occupied with other activities such as preparing a new catheter for instance.
The image quality improves by dimming the room lighting, i.e. it increases the perceptive contrast on the monitor (or monitors), while the operator observes the monitor. By dimming the room lighting, the eye of the operator adapts and the observed contrast on the monitor appears increased.
According to a second variant, the contrast of the imaging apparatus can also be directly increased to optimize the image display, if the operator is looking at the imaging apparatus. The stronger contrast advantageously significantly increases the perceptibility on the monitor. This occurs by reducing the so-called window (or contrast). The advantage of this method lies in the improvement in the perceptibility of objects on the monitor image and thus an improvement in the image quality. In general, this positively influences the diagnosis and intervention.
Alternatively to the camera registering the eye, a photo sensor registers whether the operator is looking at the imaging apparatus. In this way, a light source can be attached to the head of the operator, said light source preferably emitting a wedge-shaped infrared light beam and a light receiver can be arranged in the vicinity of the imaging apparatus. As soon as the light receiver receives the light beam, it sends a signal to a control device, which then triggers the optimization of the image display.
The imaging apparatus is preferably a monitor or a video projector. The video projector is advantageous in that the display is represented on a large screen, the position of which can be changed in a simple fashion.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described from now on with reference to the appended drawings, in which;
The exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the drawings.
Furthermore, the degree of dimming can also be modulated as a function of the type of scene displayed or as a function of the individual image. The dimming is controlled according to the diagnostic content of the images.
The at least one camera 2 is preferably installed on a monitor gantry (not shown), since the visual field from the operator 3 to the monitor gantry is free. Other expedient positions can however also be selected, such as for instance the ceiling of the operating room.
The present invention is not restricted to the embodiments shown, but instead likewise comprises changes from the scope of the invention, this being defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 011 233 | Mar 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4973149 | Hutchinson | Nov 1990 | A |
5091926 | Horton et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
6033072 | Ono et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6401050 | Cooke et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6483485 | Huang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
20040034534 | Sander et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050132408 | Dahley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050206583 | Lemelson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10226539 | Jan 2004 | DE |
04052225 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2006087689 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070230666 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |