Method and system for programming, calibrating and driving a light emitting device display

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8816946
  • Patent Number
    8,816,946
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 7, 2014
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 26, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for programming, calibrating and driving a light emitting device display is provided. The system may include extracting a time dependent parameter of a pixel for calibration.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to display technologies, more specifically a method and system for programming, calibrating and driving a light emitting device display.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Recently active-matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED) displays with amorphous silicon (a-Si), poly-silicon, organic, or other driving backplane have become more attractive due to advantages over active matrix liquid crystal displays. For example, the advantages include: with a-Si besides its low temperature fabrication that broadens the use of different substrates and makes feasible flexible displays, its low cost fabrication, high resolution, and a wide viewing angle.


An AMOLED display includes an array of rows and columns of pixels, each having an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) and backplane electronics arranged in the array of rows and columns. Since the OLED is a current driven device, the pixel circuit of the AMOLED should be capable of providing an accurate and constant drive current.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,606 discloses a method and system for calibrating passive pixels. U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,606 measures data line voltage and uses the measurement for pre-charge. However, this technique does not provide the accuracy needed for active matrix, since the active matrix calibration should work for both backplane aging and OLED aging. Further, after pre-charge, current programming must be performed. Current-programming of current driven pixels is slow due to parasitic line capacitances and suffers from non-uniformity for large displays. The speed may be an issue when programming with small currents.


Other compensation techniques have been introduced. However, there is still a need to provide a method and system which is capable of providing constant brightness, achieving high accuracy and reducing the effect of the aging of the pixel circuit.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide e method and system that obviates or mitigates at least one of the disadvantages of existing systems.


In accordance with an aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of real-time calibration for a display array having a plurality of pixel circuits arranged in row and column, including the steps of generating a priority list of pixels, which is used to prioritize pixels for calibration based on display and previous calibration data, the priority list being used to select one or more (n) pixels which are programmed with currents higher than a threshold current for calibration; selecting n pixels in a selected column of the display array from the linked list; implementing programming to the pixels in the selected column, including: monitoring a pixel current for the n pixels and obtaining calibration data; updating a compensation memory based on the calibration data for calibration; sorting the priority list for the next programming.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for real-time calibration for a display array having a plurality of pixel circuits arranged in row and column, each pixel circuit having a light emitting device and a driving transistor, the system including: a calibration scheduler for controlling programming and calibration of the display array, including: a priority list for listing one or more pixels for calibration based on display data; module for enabling, during a programming cycle, calibration mode for one or more pixels in the selected column, which are selected from the priority list, and during a programming cycle, enabling normal operation mode for the rest of the pixels in the selected column; a monitor for monitoring a pixel current for the pixels in the calibration mode through the selected column; a generator for generating a calibration data based on the monitoring result; a memory for storing calibration data; and an adjuster for adjusting a programming data applied to the display array based on the calibration data when the pixel on the normal operation mode is programmed.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for a display array having a pixel circuit, the pixel circuit being programmed through a data line, the system including: a data source for providing a programming data into the pixel circuit; a current-controlled voltage source associated with the voltage source for converting a current on the data line to a voltage associated with the current to extract a time dependent parameter of the pixel circuit.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for a display array including a plurality of pixel circuits, each pixel circuit including a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the system including: a monitor for monitoring a current or voltage on the pixel circuit; a data process unit for controlling the operation of the display array, the data process unit extracting information on an aging of the pixel circuit, based on the monitored current or voltage and determining a state of the pixel circuit; a driver controlled by the data process unit and for providing programming and calibration data to the pixel circuit, based on the state of the pixel circuit.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of driving a display array, the display array including a plurality of pixel circuits, each pixel circuit including a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the method including the steps of: applying a current or voltage to the pixel circuit; monitoring a current or voltage flowing through the pixel circuit; extracting information on an aging of the pixel circuit, based on the monitored current or voltage and determining the state of the pixel circuit; providing operation voltage to the pixel circuit, including determining programming and calibration data for the pixel circuit based on the state of the pixel circuit.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of driving a display array, the display array including a plurality of pixel circuits, each pixel circuit including a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the method including the steps of applying a current or voltage to the light emitting device; monitoring a current or voltage flowing through the light emitting device; predicting a shift in the voltage of the light emitting device, based on the monitored current or voltage and determining the state of the pixel circuit; and providing, to the light emitting device, a bias associated with the shift in the voltage of the light emitting device.


In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for driving a display array, the display array including a plurality of pixel circuits, each pixel circuit including a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the system including: a monitor for monitoring a current or voltage on the pixel circuit; a data process unit for predicting a shift in the voltage of the light emitting device, based on the monitored current or voltage and determining the state of the pixel circuit; and a circuit for providing, to the light emitting device, a bias associated with the shift in the voltage of the light emitting device.


In accordance with an aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for a display array including a plurality of pixel circuits, each pixel circuit having a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the light emitting device being located at a programming path for programming the pixel circuit, the system including: a controller for controlling the operation of the display array; a driver for providing operation voltage to the pixel circuit based on the control of the controller; and the driver providing the operation voltage to the pixel circuit during a programming cycle such that the light emitting device being removed from the programming path.


This summary of the invention does not necessarily describe all features of the invention.


Other aspects and features of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a flow chart showing a process for calibration-scheduling in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a system structure for implementing the calibration-scheduling of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a system architecture for a voltage-extracting, programming and driving in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the extracting, programming and driving system of FIG. 3 and a pixel circuit;



FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a further example of the extracting, programming and driving system of FIG. 3 and a pixel circuit;



FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a further example of the extracting, programming and driving system of FIG. 3 and a pixel circuit;



FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a further example of the extracting, programming and driving system of FIG. 3 and a pixel circuit;



FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a pixel circuit to which a step-calibration driving in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is applied;



FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a driver and extraction block and the driving transistor of FIG. 8;



FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of an extraction algorithm implemented by a DPU block of FIG. 9;



FIG. 11 is a diagram showing a further example of the extraction algorithm implemented by the DPU block of FIG. 9;



FIG. 12 is a timing diagram showing an example of waveforms for the step-calibration driving;



FIG. 13 is a timing diagram showing a further example of waveforms for the step-calibration driving;



FIG. 14 is a diagram showing a pixel circuit to which the step-calibration driving is applicable;



FIG. 15 is a graph showing the results of simulation for the step-calibration driving;



FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an example of a system architecture for the step-calibration driving with a display array;



FIG. 17 is a timing diagram showing an example of waveforms applied to the system architecture of FIG. 16;



FIG. 18 is a timing diagram showing an example of waveforms for a voltage/current extraction;



FIG. 19 is a timing diagram showing a further example of waveforms for the voltage/current extraction;



FIG. 20 is a diagram showing a pixel circuit to which the voltage/current extraction of FIG. 19 is applicable;



FIG. 21 is a timing diagram showing a further example of waveforms for the voltage/current extraction;



FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a pixel circuit to which the voltage/current extraction of FIG. 21 is applicable;



FIG. 23 is a diagram showing a mirror based pixel circuit to which OLED removing in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is applied;



FIG. 24 is a diagram showing a programming path of FIG. 23 when applying the OLED removing;



FIG. 25 is a diagram showing an example of a system architecture for the OLED removing; and



FIG. 26 is a graph showing the simulation result for the voltage on IDATA line for different threshold voltage.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention are described using a pixel including a light emitting device and a plurality of transistors. The light emitting device may be an organic light emitting diode (OLED). It is noted that “pixel” and “pixel circuit” may be used interchangeably.


Real-time calibration-scheduling for a display array having a plurality of pixels is described in detail. FIG. 1 illustrates a process for a calibration-scheduling in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. According to this technique, the pixels are calibrated based on their aging and/or usage during the normal operation of the display array.


A linked list of pixels is generated in step S2. The linked list contains an identification of a pixel with high brightness for calibration. The linked list is used to schedule the priority in calibration.


In step S4, “n” is chosen based on the display size and expected instability with time (e.g. shift in characteristics of transistors and light emitting device). “n” represents the number of pixels that are calibrated in each programming cycle. “n” may be one or more than one.


Then programming cycle starts at step S6. The step S6 includes steps S8-S16. The steps S8-S16 are implemented on a selected column of the display array.


In step S8, “n” pixels in the selected column are selected from the beginning of the linked list, hereinafter referred to as “Selected Pixels”.


In step S10, “Calibration Mode” is enabled for the Selected Pixels, and “Normal Operation Mode” is enabled for the rest of the pixels in the selected column of the display array.


In step S12, all pixels in the selected column are programmed by a voltage source driver (e.g. 28 of FIG. 2) which is connected to a data line of the pixel.


For the Selected Pixels, current flowing through the data line is monitored during the programming cycle. For the pixels other than the Selected Pixels in the selected column, the corresponding programming voltage is boosted using data stored in a memory (e.g. 34 of FIG. 2), hereinafter referred to as “ΔV compensation memory”.


In step S14, the monitored current is compared with the expected current that must flow through the data line. Then, a calibration data curve for the Selected Pixels is generated. The ΔV compensation memory is updated based on the calibration data curve.


The calibration data curve stored in the ΔV compensation memory for a pixel will be used to boost programming voltage for that pixel in the next programming cycles when that pixel is in the Normal Operation Mode.


In step S16, the identifications of the Selected Pixels are sent to the end of the linked list. The Selected Pixels have the lowest priority in the linked list for calibration.


During display operation (S6-S16), the linked list will provide a sorted priority list of pixels that must be calibrated. It is noted that in the description, the term “linked list” and the term “priority list” may be used interchangeably.


The operation goes back (S18) to the step S8. The next programming cycle starts. A new column in the display array is activated (selected), and, new “n” pixels in the new activated column are selected from the top of the linked list. The ΔV compensation memory is updated using the calibration data obtained for the new Selected Pixels.


The number of the Selected Pixels, “n”, is now described in detail. As described above, the number “n” is determined based on the display size and expected instability in device characteristics with time. It is assumed that the total number of pixels N is N=3×m1×m2, where m1 and m2 are the number of rows and columns in the display, respectively.


The highest rate in characteristics shift is K (=ΔI/Δt.I). Each programming cycle takes t=1/f.m2. The maximum expected shift in characteristics after the entire display is calibrated is ΔI/I=K.t.N/n<e, where e is the allowed error. After this the calibration can be redone from the beginning, and the error is eliminated. This shows that n>K.t.N/e or n>3.K.m1/f.e. For instance, if K=1%/hr, m1=1024, f=60 Hz, and e=0.1%, then n>0.14, which implies that it is needed to calibrate once in 5 programming cycles. This is achievable with one calibration unit, which operates only one time in 5 programming cycles. Each calibration unit enables calibration of one pixel at a programming cycle. If e=0.01%, n>1.4. This means that two calibration units calibrating two pixels in each programming cycle are required. This shows that it is feasible to implement this calibration system with very low cost.


The frequency of calibration can be reduced automatically as the display ages, since shifts in characteristics will become slower as the time progresses. In addition, the pixels that are selected for calibration can be programmed with different currents depending on display data. The only condition is that their programming current is larger than a reference current. Therefore, the calibration can be performed at multiple brightness levels for one pixel to achieve higher accuracy.


The linked list is described in detail. In the linked list, the pixels with high brightness for calibration are listed. The display data is used to determine the pixels with high brightness for calibration. Calibration at low currents is slow and often not accurate. In addition, maximum shift in characteristics occurs for pixels with high current. Thus, in order to improve the accuracy and speed of calibration, the pixels, which must be programmed with currents higher than a threshold current ITH, are selected and stored in the linked list.


ITH is a variable and may be “0”. For ITH=0, all pixels are listed in the linked list, and the calibration is performed for all pixels irrespective of their programming current.


The calibration-scheduling technique described above is applicable to any current programmed pixels, for example, but not limited to, a current mirror based pixel.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a system structure for implementing the calibration-scheduling of FIG. 1. A system 30 of FIG. 2 for implementing calibration-scheduling algorithm is provided to a display array 10 having a plurality of pixel circuits 12. The pixel circuit 12 is a current programmed pixel circuit, such as, but not limited to a current mirror based pixel. The pixel circuits 12 are arranged in row and column.


The pixel circuit 12 may include an OLED and a plurality of transistors (e.g. TFTs). The transistor may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET). The display array 10 may be an AMOLED display array.


The pixel circuit 12 is operated by a gate line 14 connected to a gate driver 20, a data line 16 connected to a voltage data driver 28, and a power line connected to a power supply 24. In FIG. 2, two data lines, two gate lines and two power lines are shown as an example. It is apparent that more than two data lines, two gate lines and two power lines may be provided to the display array 10.


The system 30 includes a calibration scheduler and memory block 32 for controlling programming and calibration of the display array 10, and a ΔV compensation memory 34 for storing ΔV compensation voltage (value). In each programming cycle, a column of the display array 10 is selected. The calibration scheduler and memory block 32 enables Normal Operation Mode or Calibration Mode for the selected column (i.e., data line) during that programming cycle.


The system 30 further includes a monitoring system for monitoring and measuring a pixel current. The monitoring system includes switches 36 and 38 and a voltage sensor 40 with an accurate resistor 42. In FIG. 2, the switches 36 and 38 are provided for each data line as an example.


The system 30 further includes a generator for generating ΔV compensation voltage based on the monitoring result. The generator includes an analog/digital converter (A/D) 44, a comparator 46, and a translator 48. The A/D 44 converts the analog output of the voltage sensor 40 into a digital output. The comparator 46 compares the digital output to an output from the translator 48. The translator 48 implements function f(V) on a digital data input 52. The translator 48 converts the current data input 52 to the voltage data input through f(v). The result of the comparison by the comparator 46 is stored in the ΔV compensation memory 34.


The system 30 further includes an adder 50 for adding the digital data input 52 and the ΔV compensation voltage stored in the ΔV compensation memory 34. The voltage data driver 28 drives a data line based on the output of the adder 50. The programming data for the data line is adjusted by adding the ΔV compensation voltage.


When the calibration scheduler and memory block 32 enables the Normal Operation Mode for a selected data line, the switch 36 is activated. The voltage output from the voltage data driver 28 is directly applied to the pixel on that data line.


When the calibration scheduler and memory block 32 enables the Calibration Mode for that data line, the switch 38 is activated. The voltage is applied to the pixel on that data line through the accurate resistor 42. The voltage drop across the resistor 42 at the final stages of the programming time (i.e. when initial transients are finished) is measured by the voltage sensor 40. The voltage drop monitored by the voltage sensor 40 is converted to digital data by the A/D 44. The resulting value of the voltage drop is proportional to the current flowing through the pixel if the pixel is a current programmed pixel circuit. This value is compared by the comparator 46 to the expected value obtained by the translator 48.


The difference between the expected value and the measured value is stored in the ΔV compensation memory 34, and will be used for a subsequent programming cycle. The difference will be used to adjust the data voltage for programming of that pixel in future.


The calibration scheduler and memory block 32 may include the linked list described above. In the beginning, the linked list is generated automatically. It may be just a list of pixels. However, during the operation it is modified.


The calibration of the pixel circuits with high brightness guarantees the high speed and accurate calibration that is needed in large or small area displays.


Since the display array 10 is driven using a voltage programming technique, it is fast and can be used for high-resolution and large area displays.


Due to speed, accuracy, and ease of implementation, the applications of the calibration-scheduling technique ranges from electroluminescent devices used for cellphones, personal organizers, monitors, TVs, to large area display boards.


The system 30 monitors and measures voltage drop which depends on time dependent parameters of the pixel, and generates a desirable programming data. However, the time dependent parameters of the pixel may be extracted by any mechanisms other than that of FIG. 2.


A further technique for programming, extracting time dependent parameters of a pixel and driving the pixel is described in detail with reference to FIGS. 3-7. This technique includes voltage-extracting for calibration. Programming data is calibrated with the extracted information, resulting in a stable pixel current over time. Using this technique, the aging of the pixel is extracted.



FIG. 3 illustrates a system architecture for implementing a voltage-extracting, programming and driving in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The system of FIG. 3 implements the voltage-extracting and programming to a current mode pixel circuit 60. The pixel circuit 60 includes a light emitting device and a plurality of transistors having a driving transistor (not shown). The transistors may be TFTs.


The pixel circuit 60 is selected by a select line SEL and is driven by DATA on a data line 61. A voltage source 62 is provided to write a programming voltage VP into the pixel circuit 60. A current-controlled voltage source (CCVS) 63 having a positive node and a negative node is provided to convert the current on the data line 61 to a voltage Vext. A display controller and scheduler 64 operates the pixel circuit 60. The display controller and scheduler 64 monitors an extracted voltage Vext output from the CCVS 63 and then controls the voltage source 62.


The resistance of CCVS 63 is negligible. Thus the current on the data line 61 is written as:

ILine=Ipixel=β(VP−VT)2  (1)

where ILine represents the current on the data line 61, Ipixel represents a pixel current, VT represents the threshold voltage of the driving transistor included in the pixel circuit 60, and β represents the gain parameter in the TFT characteristics.


As the threshold voltage of the driving TFT increases during the time, the current on the data line 61 decreases. By monitoring the extracted voltage Vext, the display controller and scheduler 64 determines the amount of shift in the threshold voltage.


The threshold voltage VT of the driving transistor can be calculate as:

VT=VP−(ILine/β)0.5  (2)


The programming voltage VP is modified with the extracted information. The extraction procedure can be implemented for one or several pixels during each frame time.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a system for the voltage-extracting, programming and driving of FIG. 3, which is employed with a top-emission current-cell pixel circuit 70. The pixel circuit 70 includes an OLED 71, a storage capacitor 72, a driving transistor 73 and switch transistors 74 and 75.


The transistors 73, 74 and 75 may be n-type TFTs. However, these transistors 73, 74 and 75 may be p-type transistors. The voltage-extracting and programming technique applied to the pixel circuit 70 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors.


The driving transistor 73 is connected to a data line 76 through the switch transistor 75, and is connected to the OLED 71, and also is connected to the storage capacitor 72 through the switch transistor 74. The gate terminal of the driving transistor 73 is connected to the storage capacitor 72. The gate terminals of the switch transistors 74 and 75 are connected to a select line SEL. The OLED 71 is connected to a voltage supply electrode or line VDD. The pixel circuit 70 is selected by the select line SEL and is driven by DATA on the data line 76.


A current conveyor (CC) 77 has X, Y and Z terminals, and is used to extract a current on the data line 76 without loading it. A voltage source 78 applies programming voltage to the Y terminal of the CC 77. In the CC 77, the X terminal is forced by feedback to have the same voltage as that of the Y terminal. Also, the current on the X terminal is duplicated into the Z terminal of the CC 77. A current-controlled voltage source (CCVS) 79 has a positive node and a negative node. The CCVS 79 converts the current on the Z terminal of the CC 77 into a voltage Vext.


Vext is provided to the display controller and scheduler 64 of FIG. 3, where the threshold voltage of the driving transistor 73 is extracted. The display controller and scheduler 64 controls the voltage source 78 based on the extracted threshold voltage.



FIG. 5 illustrates a further example of a system for the voltage-extracting, programming, and driving of FIG. 3, which is employed with a bottom-emission current-cell pixel circuit 80. The pixel circuit 80 includes an OLED 81, a storage capacitor 82, a driving transistor 83, and switch transistors 84 and 85. The transistors 83, 84 and 85 may be n-type TFTs. However, these transistors 83, 84 and 85 may be p-type transistors.


The driving transistor 83 is connected to a data line 86 through the switch transistor 85, and is connected to the OLED 81, and also is connected to the storage capacitor 82. The gate terminal of the driving transistor 83 is connected to a voltage supply line VDD through the switch transistor 84. The gate terminals of the switch transistors 84 and 85 are connected to a select line SEL. The pixel circuit 80 is selected by the select line SEL and is driven by DATA on the data line 86.


A current conveyor (CC) 87 has X, Y and Z terminals, and is used to extract a current on the data line 86 without loading it. A voltage source 88 applies a negative programming voltage at the Y terminal of the CC 87. In the CC 87, the X terminal is forced by feedback to have the same voltage as that of the Y terminal. Also, the current on the X terminal is duplicated into the Z terminal of the CC 87. A current-controlled voltage source (CCVS) 89 has a positive node and a negative node. The CCVS 89 converts the current of the Z terminal of the CC 87 into a voltage Vext.


Vext is provided to the display controller and scheduler 64 of FIG. 3, where the threshold voltage of the driving transistor 83 is extracted. The display controller and scheduler 64 controls the voltage source 88 based on the extracted threshold voltage.



FIG. 6 illustrates a further example of a system for the voltage-extracting, programming and driving of FIG. 3, which is employed with a top-emission current-mirror pixel circuit 90. The pixel circuit 90 includes an OLED 91, a storage capacitor 92, mirror transistors 93 and 94, and switch transistors 95 and 96. The transistors 93, 94, 95 and 96 may be n-type TFTs. However, these transistors 93, 94, 95 and 96 may be p-type transistors.


The mirror transistor 93 is connected to a data line 97 through the switch transistor 95, and is connected to the storage capacitor 92 through the switch transistor 96. The gate terminals of the mirror transistors 93 and 94 are connected to the storage capacitor 92 and the switch transistor 96. The mirror transistor 94 is connected to a voltage supply electrode or line VDD through the OLED 91. The gate terminals of the switch transistors 85 and 86 are connected to a select line SEL. The pixel circuit 90 is selected by the select line SEL and is driven by DATA on the data line 97.


A current conveyor (CC) 98 has X, Y and Z terminals, and is used to extract the current of the data line 97 without loading it. A voltage source 99 applies a positive programming voltage at the Y terminal of the CC 98. In the CC 98, the X terminal is forced by feedback to have the same voltage as the voltage of the Y terminal. Also, the current on the X terminal is duplicated into the Z terminal of the CC 98. A current-controlled voltage source (CCVS) 100 has a positive node and a negative node. The CCVS 100 converts a current on the Z terminal of the CC 98 into a voltage Vext.


Vext is provided to the display controller and scheduler 64 of FIG. 3, where the threshold voltage of the driving transistor 93 is extracted. The display controller and scheduler 64 controls the voltage source 99 based on the extracted threshold voltage.



FIG. 7 illustrates a further example of a system for the voltage-extracting, programming and driving of FIG. 3, which is employed with a bottom-emission current-mirror pixel circuit 110. The pixel circuit 110 includes an OLED 111, a storage capacitor 112, mirror transistors 113 and 116, and switch transistors 114 and 115. The transistors 113, 114, 115 and 116 may be n-type TFTs. However, these transistors 113, 114, 115 and 116 may be p-type transistors.


The mirror transistor 113 is connected to a data line 117 through the switch transistor 114, and is connected to the storage capacitor 112 through the switch transistor 115. The gate terminals of the mirror transistors 113 and 116 are connected to the storage capacitor 112 and the switch transistor 115. The mirror transistor 116 is connected to a voltage supply line VDD. The mirror transistors 113, 116 and the storage capacitor 112 are connected to the OLED 111. The gate terminals of the switch transistors 114 and 115 are connected to a select line SEL. The pixel circuit 110 is selected by the select line SEL and is driven by DATA on the data line 117.


A current conveyor (CC) 118 has X, Y and Z terminals, and is used to extract the current of the data line 117 without loading it. A voltage source 119 applies a positive programming voltage at the Y terminal of the CC 118. In the CC 118, the X terminal is forced by feedback to have the same voltage as the voltage of the Y terminal of the CC 118. Also, the current on the X terminal is duplicated into the Z terminal of the CC 118. A current-controlled voltage source (CCVS) 120 has a positive node and a negative node. The 120 converts the current on the Z terminal of the CC 118 into a voltage Vext.


Vext is provided to the display controller and scheduler 64 of FIG. 3, where the threshold voltage of the driving transistor 113 is extracted. The display controller and scheduler 64 controls the voltage source 119 based on the extracted threshold voltage.


Referring to FIGS. 3-7, using the voltage-extracting technique, time dependent parameters of a pixel (e.g. threshold shift) can be extracted. Thus, the programming voltage can be calibrated with the extracted information, resulting in a stable pixel current over time. Since the voltage of the OLED (i.e. 71 of FIG. 4, 81 of FIG. 5, 91 of FIG. 6, 111 of FIG. 7) affects the current directly, the voltage-extracting driving technique described above can also be used to extract OLED degradation as well as the threshold shift.


The voltage-extracting technique described above can be used with any current-mode pixel circuit, including current-mirror and current-cell pixel circuit architectures, and are applicable to the display array 10 of FIG. 2. A stable current independent of pixel aging under prolonged display operation can be provided using the extracted information. Thus, the display operating lifetime is efficiently improved.


It is noted that the transistors in the pixel circuits of FIGS. 3-7 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET). The pixel circuits of FIGS. 3-7 may form AMOLED display arrays.


A further technique for programming, extracting time dependent parameters of a pixel and driving the pixel is described in detail with reference to FIGS. 8-17. The technique includes a step-calibration driving technique. In the step-calibration driving technique, information on the aging of a pixel (e.g. threshold shift) is extracted. The extracted information will be used to generate a stable pixel current/luminance. Despite using the one-bit extraction technique, the resolution of the extracted aging is defined by display drivers. Also, the dynamic effects are compensated since the pixel aging is extracted under operating condition, which is similar to the driving cycle.



FIG. 8 illustrates a pixel circuit 160 to which a step-calibration driving in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is applied. The pixel circuit 160 includes an OLED 161, a storage capacitor 162, and a driving transistor 163 and switch transistors 164 and 165. The pixel circuit 160 is a current-programmed, 3-TFT pixel circuit. A plurality of the pixel circuits 160 may form an AMOLED display.


The transistors 163, 164 and 165 are n-type TFTs. However, the transistors 163, 164 and 165 may be p-type TFTs. The step-calibration driving technique applied to the pixel circuit 160 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors. The transistors 163, 164 and 165 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET).


The gate terminal of the driving transistor 163 is connected to a signal line VDATA through the switch transistor 164, and also connected to the storage capacitor 162. The source terminal of the driving transistor 163 is connected to a common ground. The drain terminal of the driving transistor 163 is connected to a monitor line MONITOR through the switch transistor 165, and also is connected to the cathode electrode of the OLED 161.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 164 is connected to a select line SEL1. The source terminal of the switch transistor 164 is connected to the gate terminal of the driving transistor 163, and is connected to the storage capacitor 162. The drain terminal of the switch transistor 164 is connected to VDATA.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 165 is connected to a select line SEL2. The source terminal of the switch transistor 165 is connected to MONITOR. The drain terminal of the switch transistor 165 is connected to the drain terminal of the driving transistor 163 and the cathode electrode of the OLED 161. The anode electrode of the OLED 161 is connected to a voltage supply electrode or line VDD.


The transistors 163 and 164 and the storage capacitor 162 are connected at node A3. The transistors 163 and 165 and the OLED 161 are connected at node B3.



FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a driver and extraction block 170 along with the driving transistor 163 of FIG. 8. In FIG. 9, each of Rs 171a and Rs 171b represents the ON resistance of the switch transistors (e.g. 164, 165 of FIG. 8). Cs represents the storage capacitor of the pixel, COLED represents the OLED capacitance, and CP represents the line parasitic capacitance. In FIG. 9, the OLED is presented as a capacitance.


A block 173 is used to extract the threshold voltage of the driving transistor, during the extraction cycle. The block 173 may be a current sense amplifier (SA) or a current comparator. In the description, the block 173 is referred to as “SA block 173”.


If the current of the MONITOR line is higher than a reference current (IREF), the output of the SA block 173 (i.e. Triggers of FIG. 10, 11) becomes one. If the current of the MONITOR line is less than the reference current (IREF), the output of the SA block 173 becomes zero.


It is noted that the SA block 173 can be shared between few columns result in less overhead. Also, the calibration of the pixel circuit can be done one at a time, so the extraction circuits can be shared between the all columns.


A data process unit (DPU) block 172 is provided to control the programming cycle, contrast, and brightness, to perform the calibration procedure and to control the driving cycle. The DPU block 172 implements extraction algorithm to extract (estimate) the threshold voltage of the driving transistor based on the output from the SA block 173, and controls a driver 174 which is connected to the driving transistor 163.



FIG. 10 illustrates an example of the extraction algorithm implemented by the DPU block 172 of FIG. 9. The algorithm of FIG. 10 is in a part of the DPU block 172. In FIG. 10, VT(i, j) represents the extracted threshold voltage for the pixel (i, j) at the previous extraction cycle, VS represents the resolution of the driver 174, “i” represents a row of a pixel array and “j” represents a column of a pixel array. Trigger conveys the comparison results of the SA block 173 of FIG. 9. Less_state 180 determines the situation in which the actual VT of the pixel is less than the predicted VT (VTM), Equal_state 181 determines the situation in which the predicted VT (VTM) and the actual VT of the pixel are equal, and Great state 182 determines the situation in which the actual VT of the pixel is greater than the predicted VT (VTM).


The DPU block 172 of FIG. 9 determines an intermediate threshold voltage VTM as follows:


(A1) When s(i, j)=Less_state (180), the actual threshold voltage is less than VT(i, j), VTM is set to (VT (i, j)−VS).


(A2) When s(i, j)=Equal_state (181), the actual threshold voltage is equal to VT(i, j), VTM is set to VT (i, j).


(A3) When s(i, j)=Greater_state (182), the actual threshold voltage is greater than VT(i, j), VTM is set to (VT(i, j)+VS).


where s(i, j) represents the previous state of the pixel (i, j) stored in a calibration memory (e.g. 208 of FIG. 16).



FIG. 11 illustrates a further example of the extraction algorithm implemented by the DPU block 172 of FIG. 9. The algorithm of FIG. 11 is in a part of the DPU block 172 of FIG. 9. In FIG. 11, VT(i, j) represents the extracted threshold voltage for the pixel (i, j) at the previous extraction cycle, VS represents the resolution of the driver 174, “i” represents a row of a pixel array and “j” represents a column of a pixel array. Trigger conveys the comparison results of the SA block 173.


Further, in FIG. 11, Vres represents the step that will be added/subtracted to the predicted VT (VTM) in order achieve the actual VT of the pixel, A represents the reduction gain of a prediction step, and K represents the increase gain of the prediction step.


The operation of FIG. 11 is the same as that of FIG. 10, except that it has gain extra states L2 and G2 for rapid extraction of abrupt changes. In the gain states, the step size is increased to follow the changes more rapidly. L1 and G1 are the transition states which define the VT change is abrupt or normal.



FIG. 12 illustrates an example of waveforms applied to the pixel circuit 160 of FIG. 8. In FIG. 12, VCall=VB+VTM, and VDR=VP+VT(i, j)+VREF, where VB represents the bias voltage during the extraction cycle, VTM is defined based on the algorithm shown in FIG. 10 or 11, VP represents a programming voltage, VT (i, j) represents the extracted threshold voltage at the previous extraction cycle, VREF represents the source voltage of the driving transistor during the programming cycle.


Referring to FIGS. 8-12, the operation of the pixel circuit 160 includes operating cycles X51, X52, X53, and X54. In FIG. 12, an extraction cycle is separated from a programming cycle. The extraction cycle includes X51 and X52, and the programming cycle includes X53. X54 is a driving cycle. At the end of the programming cycle, node A3 is charged to (VP+VT) where VP is a programming voltage and VT is the threshold voltage of the driving transistor 163.


In the first operating cycle X51: SEL1 and SEL 2 are high. Node A3 is charged to Vcal, and node B3 is charged to VREF. Vcal is VB+VTM in which VB is a bias voltage, and VTM the predicted VT, and VREF should be larger than VDD−VOLED0 where VOLED0 is the ON voltage of the OLED 161.


In the second operating cycle X52: SEL1 goes to zero. The gate-source voltage of the driving transistor 163 is given by:

VGS=VB+VTM+ΔVB+ΔVTM−ΔVT2−ΔVH

where VGS represents the gate-source voltage of the driving transistor 163, ΔVB, ΔVTM, ΔVT2 and ΔVH are the dynamic effects depending on VB, VTM, VT2 and VH, respectively. VT2 represents the threshold voltage of the switch transistor 164, and VH represents the change in the voltage of SEL1 at the beginning of second operating cycle X52 when it goes to zero.


The SA block 173 is tuned to sense the current larger than β(VB)2, so that the gate-source voltage of the driving transistor 163 is larger than (VB+VT), where β is the gain parameter in the I-V characteristic of the driving transistor 163.


As a result, after few iterations, VTM and the extracted threshold voltage VT(i, j) for the pixel (i, j) converge to:

VTM=VT−γ·(VB+VT+VT2−VH)






γ
=



C

g





2


/

(

2
·

C
S


)



1
+


C

g





2


/

(

2
·

C
S


)









where Cg2 represents the gate capacitance of the switch transistor 164.


In the third operating cycle X53: SEL1 is high. VDATA goes to VDR. Node A3 is charged to [VP+VT(i, j)−γ(VP−VB)].


In the fourth operating cycle X54: SEL1 and SEL2 go to zero. Considering the dynamic effects, the gate-source voltage of the driving transistor 163 can be written as:

VGS=VP−VT


Therefore, the pixel current becomes independent of the static and dynamic effects of the threshold voltage shift.


In FIG. 12, the extraction cycle and the programming cycle are shown as separated cycles. However, the extraction cycle and the programming cycle may be merged as shown in FIG. 13. FIG. 13 illustrates a further example of waveforms applied to the pixel circuit 160 of FIG. 8.


Referring to FIGS. 8-11 and 13, the operation of the pixel circuit 160 includes operating cycles X61, X62 and X63. Programming and extraction cycles are merged into the operating cycles X61 and X62. The operating cycle X63 is a driving cycle.


During the programming cycle, the pixel current is compared with the desired current, and the threshold voltage of the driving transistor is extracted with the algorithm of FIG. 10 or 11. The pixel circuit 160 is programmed with VDR=VP+VT (i, j)+VREF during the operating cycle X61. Then the pixel current is monitored through the MONITOR line, and is compared with the desired current. Based on the comparison result and using the extraction algorithm of FIG. 10 or 11, the threshold voltage VT (i, j) is updated.


In FIG. 8, two select lines SEL1 and SEL2 are shown. However, a signal select line (e.g. SEL1) can be used as a common select line to operate the switch transistors 164 and 165. When using the common select line, SEL1 of FIG. 12 stays at high in the second operating cycle X52, and the VGS remains at (VB−VTM). Therefore, the dynamic effects are not detected.


The step-calibration driving technique described above is applicable to the pixel circuit 190 of FIG. 14. The pixel circuit 190 includes an OLED 191, a storage capacitor 192, and a driving transistor 193 and switch transistors 194 and 195. The pixel circuit 190 is a current-programmed, 3-TFT pixel circuit. A plurality of the pixel circuits 190 may form an AMOLED display.


The transistors 193, 194 and 195 are n-type TFTs. However, the transistors 193, 194 and 195 may be p-type TFTs. The step-calibration driving technique applied to the pixel circuit 190 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors. The transistors 193, 194 and 195 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET).


The gate terminal of the driving transistor 193 is connected to a signal line VDATA through the switch transistor 194, and also connected to the storage capacitor 192. The source terminal of the driving transistor 193 is connected to the anode electrode of the OLED 191, and is connected to a monitor line MONITOR through the switch transistor 195. The drain terminal of the driving transistor 193 is connected to a voltage supply line VDD. The gate terminals of the transistors 194 and 195 are connected to select lines SEL1 and SEL2, respectively.


The transistors 193 and 194 and the storage capacitor 192 are connected at node A4. The transistor 195, the OLED 191 and the storage capacitor 192 are connected at node B4.


The structure of the pixel circuit 190 is similar to that of FIG. 8, except that the OLED 191 is at the source terminal of the driving transistor 193. The operation of the pixel circuit 190 is the same as that of FIG. 12 or 13.


Since the source terminal of the drive TFT 193 is forced to VREF during the extraction cycle (X51 and X52 or X62), the extracted data is independent of the ground bouncing. Also, during the programming cycle (X53 or X61), the source terminal of the drive TFT is forced to VREF, the gate-source voltage of the drive TFT becomes independent of the ground bouncing. As a result of these conditions, the pixel current is independent of ground bouncing.



FIG. 15 illustrates the results of simulation for the step-calibration driving technique. In FIG. 15, “Case I” represents an operation of FIG. 8 where SEL1 goes to zero in the second operating cycle (X52 of FIG. 12); “Case II” represents an operation of FIG. 8 where SEL1 stays at high in the second operating cycle.


In FIG. 15, ΔVTR is the minimum detectable shift in the threshold voltage of the driving transistor (e.g. 163 of FIG. 8), ΔVT2R is the minimum detectable shift in the threshold voltage of the switch transistor (e.g. 164 of FIG. 8), and IPL is the pixel current of the pixel during the driving cycle.


The pixel current of Case II is smaller than that of Case I for a given programming voltage due to the dynamic effects of the threshold voltage shift. Also, the pixel current of Case II increases as the threshold voltage of the driving transistor increases (a), and decreases as the threshold voltage of the switch transistor decreases (b). However, the pixel current of Case I is stable. The maximum error induced in the pixel current is less than %0.5 for any shift in the threshold voltage of the driving and switch TFTs. It is obvious that ΔVT2R is larger than ΔVTR because the effect of a shift in VT on the pixel current is dominant. These two parameters are controlled by the resolution (VS) of the driver (e.g. 174 of FIG. 9), and the SNR of the SA block (e.g. 193 of FIG. 9). Since a shift smaller than ΔVTR cannot be detected, and also the time constant of threshold-shift is large, the extraction cycles (e.g. X51, X52 of FIG. 12) can be done after a long time interval consisting of several frames, leading to lower power consumption. Also, the major operating cycles become the other programming cycle (e.g. X53 of FIG. 12) and the driving cycle (e.g. X54 of FIG. 12). As a result, the programming time reduces significantly, providing for high-resolution, large-area AMOLED displays where a high-speed programming is prerequisite.



FIG. 16 illustrates an example of a system architecture for the step-calibration driving with a display array 200. The display array 200 includes a plurality of the pixel circuits (e.g. 160 of FIG. 8 or 190 of FIG. 14).


A gate driver 202 for selecting the pixel circuits, a drivers/SAs block 204, and a data process and calibration unit block 206 are provided to the display array 200. The drivers/SAs block 204 includes the driver 174 and the SA block 173 of FIG. 9. The data process and calibration unit block 206 includes the DPU block 172 of FIG. 9. “Calibration” in FIG. 16 includes the calibration data from a calibration memory 208, and may include some user defined constants for setting up calibration data processing. The contrast and the brightness inputs are used to adjust the contrast and the brightness of the panel by the user. Also, gamma-correction data is defined based on the OLED characteristic and human eye. The gamma-correction input is used to adjust the pixel luminance for human eyes.


The calibration memory 208 stores the extracted threshold voltage VT(i, j) and the state s(i, j) of each pixel. A memory 210 stores the other required data for the normal operation of a display including gamma correction, resolution, contrast, and etc. The DPU block performs the normal tasks assigned to a controller and scheduler in a display. Besides, the algorithm of FIG. 10 or 11 is added to it to perform the calibration.



FIG. 17 illustrates an example of waveforms applied to the system architecture of FIG. 16. In FIG. 17, each of ROW[1], ROW[2], and ROW[3] represents a row of the display array 200, “E” represents an extraction operation, “P” represents a programming operation and “D” represents a driving operation. It is noted that the extraction cycles (E) are not required to be done for all the frame cycle. Therefore, after a long time interval (extraction interval), the extraction is repeated for a pixel.


As shown in FIG. 17, only one extraction procedure occurs during a frame time. Also, the VT extraction of the pixel circuits at the same row is preformed at the same time.


Therefore, the maximum time required to refresh a frame is:

τF=n·τPE

where τF represents the frame time, τP represents the time required to write the pixel data into the storage capacitor (e.g. 162 of FIG. 8), τE represents the extraction time, and n represents the number of row in the display array (e.g. 200 of FIG. 16).


Assuming τE=m·τP, the frame time τF can be written as:

τF=(n+m)·τP

where m represents the timing required for the extraction cycles in the scale of programming cycle timing (τP).


For example, for a Quarter Video Graphics Array (QVGA) display (240×320) with frame rate of 60 Hz, if m=10, the programming time of each row is 66 μs, and the extraction time is 0.66 ms.


It is noted that the step-calibration driving technique described above is applicable to any current-programmed pixel circuit other than those of FIGS. 8 and 14.


Using the step-calibration driving technique, the time dependent parameter(s) of a pixel, such as threshold shift, is extracted. Then, the programming-voltage is calibrated with the extracted information, resulting in a stable pixel current over time. Further, a stable current independent of the pixel aging under prolonged display operation can be is provided to the pixel circuit, which efficiently improves the display operating lifetime.


A technique for programming, extracting time dependent parameters of a pixel and driving the pixel in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention is described in detail. The technique includes extracting information on the aging of a pixel (e.g. OLED luminance) by monitoring OLED voltage or OLED current, and generating luminance. The programming voltage is calibrated with the extracted information, resulting in stable brightness over time.


Since the OLED voltage/current has been reported to be correlated with the brightness degradation in the OLED (e.g. 161 of FIG. 8, 191 of FIG. 14), the programming voltage can be modified by the OLED voltage/current to provide a constant brightness.


For example, during the driving cycle, the voltage/current of the OLED (161 of FIG. 8 or 191 of FIG. 14) is extracted while SEL2 is high. Since the OLED voltage or current has been reported to be correlated with the brightness degradation in the OLED, the programming voltage can be modified by the OLED voltage to provide a constant brightness.



FIG. 18 illustrates an example of waveforms for the voltage/current extraction. The waveforms of FIG. 18 are applicable to the pixel circuit 160 of FIG. 8 and the pixel circuit 190 of FIG. 14 to extract OLED voltage/current. The operation of FIG. 18 includes operating cycles X71, X72 and X73. The operating cycles X71 and X72 are an OLED extraction cycle. The operating cycle X73 is one of the operating cycles shown in FIGS. 12 and 13.


During the first operating cycle X71, SEL1 and SEL2 are high, and VDATA is zero. The gate-source voltage of the driving transistor (e.g. 163 of FIG. 8) becomes zero. A current or voltage is applied to the OLED (161 of FIG. 8) through the MONITOR line.


During the second operating cycle X72, SEL2 is high and SEL1 is low. The OLED voltage or current is extracted through the MONITOR line using the algorithm presented in FIG. 10 or 11. This waveform can be combined with any other driving waveform.


In the above description, the algorithm of FIGS. 10 and 11 is used to predict the aging data, i.e. VT shift, based on the comparison results (current with current or voltage with voltage). However, the algorithm of FIGS. 10 and 11 is applicable to predict the shift in the OLED voltage VOLED by replacing VT with the VOLED and the comparison result of OLED current/voltage with a reference current/voltage. In the description above, the system architecture shown in FIG. 9 is used to compensate for the threshold shift. However, it is understood that the OLED data is also extracted when the architecture of FIG. 9, i.e. DPU 172, block 173, driver 174, is used. This data can be used to compensate for the OLED shift.


The operating cycle X73 can be any operating cycle including the programming cycle. This depends on the status of the panel after OLED extraction. If it is during the operation, then X73 is the programming cycle of the waveforms in FIGS. 12 and 13. The OLED voltage can be extracted during the driving cycle X55/X63 of FIG. 12/13. During the driving cycle X55/X63, the SEL2 of FIG. 8 or 14 goes to a high voltage, and so the voltage of the OLED can be read back through the MONITOR for a specific pixel current.



FIG. 19 illustrates a further example of waveforms for the voltage/current extraction. FIG. 20 illustrates a pixel circuit 220 to which the voltage/current extraction of FIG. 19 is applied.


Referring to FIG. 20, the pixel circuit 220 includes an OLED 221, a storage capacitor 222, and a driving transistor 223 and switch transistors 224 and 225. A plurality of the pixel circuits 220 may form an AMOLED display.


The transistors 223, 224 and 225 are n-type TFTs. However, the transistors 223, 224 and 225 may be p-type TFTs. The voltage/current extraction technique applied to the pixel circuit 220 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors. The transistors 223, 224 and 225 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET).


The gate terminal of the driving transistor 223 is connected to the source terminal of the switch transistor 224, and also connected to the storage capacitor 222. The one terminal of the driving transistor 223 is connected to a common ground. The other terminal of the driving transistor 223 is connected to a monitor and data line MONITOR/DATA through the switch transistor 235, and is also connected to the cathode electrode of the OLED 221.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 224 is connected to a select line SEL1. The one terminal of the switch transistor 224 is connected to the gate terminal of the driving transistor 223, and is connected to the storage capacitor 222. The other terminal of the switch transistor 224 is connected to the cathode electrode of the OLED 221.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 225 is connected to a select line SEL2. The one terminal of the switch transistor 225 is connected to MONITOR/DATA. The other terminal of the switch transistor 225 is connected to the driving transistor 223 and the cathode electrode of the OLED 221. The anode electrode of the OLED 221 is connected to a voltage supply electrode or line VDD.


The transistors 223 and 224 and the storage capacitor 222 are connected at node A5. The transistors 223 and 225 and the OLED 221 are connected at node B5.


The pixel circuit 220 is similar to the pixel circuit 160 of FIG. 8. However, in the pixel circuit 220, the MONITOR/DATA line is used for monitoring and programming purpose.


Referring to FIGS. 19-20, the operation of the pixel circuit 220 includes operating cycles X81, X82 and X83.


During the first operating cycle X81, SEL1 and SEL2 are high and MONITOR/DATA is zero. The gate-source voltage of the driving transistor (223 of FIG. 20) becomes zero.


During the second operating cycle X82, a current or voltage is applied to the OLED through the MONITOR/DATA line, and its voltage or current is extracted. As described above, the shift in the OLED voltage is extracted using the algorithm presented in FIG. 10 or 11 based on the monitored voltage or current. This waveform can be combined with any driving waveform.


The operating cycle X83 can be any operating cycle including the programming cycle. This depends on the status of the panel after OLED extraction.


The OLED voltage/current can be extracted during the driving cycle of the pixel circuit 220 of FIG. 20 after it is programmed for a constant current using any driving technique. During the driving cycle the SEL2 goes to a high voltage, and so the voltage of the OLED can be read back through the MONITOR/DATA line for a specific pixel current.



FIG. 21 illustrates a further example of waveforms for the voltage/current extraction technique. FIG. 22 illustrates a pixel circuit 230 to which the voltage/current extraction of FIG. 21 is applied. The waveforms of FIG. 21 is also applicable to the pixel circuit 160 of FIG. 8 to extract OLED voltage/current.


Referring to FIG. 22, the pixel circuit 230 includes an OLED 231, a storage capacitor 232, and a driving transistor 233 and switch transistors 234 and 235. A plurality of the pixel circuits 230 may form an AMOLED display.


The transistors 233, 234 and 235 are n-type TFTs. However, the transistors 233, 234 and 235 may be p-type TFTs. The voltage/current extraction technique applied to the pixel circuit 230 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors. The transistors 233, 234 and 235 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET).


The gate terminal of the driving transistor 233 is connected to the source terminal of the switch transistor 234, and also connected to the storage capacitor 232. The one terminal of the driving transistor 233 is connected to a voltage supply line VDD. The other terminal of the driving transistor 233 is connected to a monitor and data line MONITOR/DATA through the switch transistor 235, and is also connected to the anode electrode of the OLED 231.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 234 is connected to a select line SEL1. The one terminal of the switch transistor 234 is connected to the gate terminal of the driving transistor 233, and is connected to the storage capacitor 232. The other terminal of the switch transistor 234 is connected to VDD.


The gate terminal of the switch transistor 225 is connected to a select line SEL2. The one terminal of the switch transistor 235 is connected to MONITOR/DATA. The other terminal of the switch transistor 235 is connected to the driving transistor 233 and the anode electrode of the OLED 231. The anode electrode of the OLED 231 is connected to VDD.


The transistors 233 and 234 and the storage capacitor 232 are connected at node A6. The transistors 233 and 235 and the OLED 231 are connected at node B5.


The pixel circuit 230 is similar to the pixel circuit 190 of FIG. 14. However, in the pixel circuit 230, the MONITOR/DATA line is used for monitoring and programming purpose.


Referring to FIGS. 21-22, the operation of FIG. 22 includes operating cycles X91, X92 and X93.


During the first operating cycle X91, SEL1 and SEL2 are high and VDD goes to zero. The gate-source voltage of the driving transistor (e.g. 233 of FIG. 21) becomes zero.


During the second operating cycle X92, a current (voltage) is applied to the OLED (e.g. 231 of FIG. 21) through the MONITOR/DATA line, and its voltage (current) is extracted. As described above, the shift in the OLED voltage is extracted using the algorithm presented in FIG. 10 or 11 based on the monitored voltage or current. This waveform can be combined with any other driving waveform.


The operating cycle X93 can be any operating cycle including the programming cycle. This depends on the status of the panel after OLED extraction.


The OLED voltage can be extracted during the driving cycle of the pixel circuit 230 of FIG. 21 after it is programmed for a constant current using any driving technique. During the driving cycle the SEL2 goes to a high voltage, and so the voltage of the OLED can be read back through the MONITOR/DATA line for a specific pixel current.


As reported, the OLED characteristics improve under negative bias stress. As a result, a negative bias related to the stress history of the pixel, extracted from the OLED voltage/current, can be applied to the OLED during the time in which the display is not operating. This method can be used for any pixel circuit presented herein.


Using the OLED voltage/current extraction technique, a pixel circuit can provide stable brightness that is independent of pixel aging under prolonged display operation, to efficiently improve the display operating lifetime.


A technique for reducing the unwanted emission in a display array having a light emitting device in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention is described in detail. This technique includes removing OLED from a programming path during a programming cycle. This technique can be adopted in hybrid driving technique to extract information on the precise again of a pixel, e.g. the actual threshold voltage shift/mismatch of the driving transistor. The light emitting device is turned off during the programming/calibration cycle so that it prevents the unwanted emission and effect of the light emitting device on the pixel aging. This technique can be applied to any current mirror pixel circuit fabricated in any technology including poly silicon, amorphous silicon, crystalline silicon, and organic materials.



FIG. 23 illustrates a mirror based pixel circuit 250 to which a technique for removing OLED from a programming path during a programming cycle is applied. The pixel circuit 250 includes an OLED 251, a storage capacitor 252, a programming transistor 253, a driving transistor 254, and switch transistors 255 and 256. The gate terminals of the transistors 253 and 254 are connected to IDATA through the switch transistors 255 and 256.


The transistors 253, 254, 255 and 256 are n-type TFTs. However, the transistors 253, 254, 255 and 256 may be p-type TFTs. The OLED removing technique applied to the pixel circuit 250 is also applicable to a pixel circuit having p-type transistors. The transistors 253, 254, 255 and 256 may be fabricated using amorphous silicon, nano/micro crystalline silicon, poly silicon, organic semiconductors technologies (e.g. organic TFT), NMOS/PMOS technology or CMOS technology (e.g. MOSFET).


The transistors 253, 254 and 256 and the storage capacitor 252 are connected at node A10. The transistors 253 and 254, the OLED 251 and the storage capacitor 252 are connected at node B10.


In the conventional current programming, SEL goes high, and a programming current (IP) is applied to IDATA. Considering that the width of the mirror transistor 253 is “m” times larger than the width of the mirror transistor 254, the current flowing through the OLED 251 during the programming cycle is (m+1)IP. When “m” is large to gain significant speed improvement, the unwanted emission may become considerable.


By contrast, according to the OLED removing technique, VDD is brought into a lower voltage. This ensures the OLED 251 to be removed from a programming path as shown in FIG. 24.


During a programming cycle, SEL is high and VDD goes to a reference voltage (Vref) in which the OLED 251 is reversely biased. Therefore, the OLED 251 is removed from the current path during the programming cycle.


During the programming cycle, the pixel circuit 250 may be programmed with scaled current through IDATA without experiencing unwanted emission.


During the programming cycle, the pixel circuit 250 may be programmed with current and using one of the techniques describe above. The voltage of the IDATA line is read back to extract the threshold voltage of the mirror transistor 253 which is the same as threshold voltage of the driving transistor 254.


Also, during the programming cycle, the pixel circuit 250 may be programmed with voltage through the IDATA line, using one of the techniques describe above. The current of the IDATA line is read back to extract the threshold voltage of the mirror transistor 253 which is the same as threshold voltage of the driving transistor 254.


The reference voltage Vref is chosen so that the voltage at node B10 becomes smaller than the ON voltage of the OLED 251. As a result, the OLED 251 turns off and the unwanted emission is zero. The voltage of the IDATA line includes

VP+VT+ΔVT  (3)

where VP includes the drain-source voltage of the driving transistor 254 and the gate-source voltage of the transistor 253, VT is the threshold voltage of the transistor 253 (254), and ΔVT is the VT shift/mismatch.


At the end of the programming cycle, VDD goes to its original value, and so voltage at node B10 goes to the OLED voltage VOLED. At the driving cycle, SEL is low. The gate voltage of the transistor 254/253 is fixed and stored in the storage capacitor 252, since the switch transistors 255 and 256 are off. Therefore, the pixel current during the driving cycle becomes independent of the threshold voltage VT.


The OLED removing technique can be adopted in hybrid driving technique to extract the VT-shift or VT-mismatch. From (3), if the pixel is programmed with the current, the only variant parameter in the voltage of the IDATA line is the VT shift/mismatch (ΔNT). Therefore, ΔVT can be extracted and the programming data can be calibrated with ΔVT.



FIG. 25 illustrates an example of a system architecture for implementing the OLED removing technique. A display array 260 includes a plurality of pixel circuits, e.g. pixel circuit 250 of FIG. 26. A display controller and scheduler 262 controls and schedules the operation of the display array 260. A driver 264 provides operation voltages to the pixel circuit. The driver provides the operation voltage(s) to the pixel circuit based on instructions/commands from the display controller and scheduler 262 such that the OLED is removed from a programming path of the pixel circuit, as described above.


The controller and scheduler 262 may include functionality of the display controller and scheduler 64 of FIG. 3, or may include functionality of the data process and calibration unit 206 of FIG. 16. The system of FIG. 25 may have any of these functionalities, the calibration-scheduling described above, the voltage/current extraction described above, or combinations thereof.


The simulation result for the voltage on IDATA line for different VT is illustrated in FIG. 26. Referring to FIGS. 23-26, the voltage of the DATA line includes the shift in the threshold voltage of the transistors 253 and 254. The programming current is 1 μA.


The unwanted emission is reduced significantly resulting in a higher resolution. Also, individual extraction of circuit aging and light emitting device aging become possible, leading in a more accurate calibration.


It is noted that each of the transistors shown in FIGS. 4-8,14, 20, 21, 23 and 24 can be replaced with a p-type transistor using the concept of complementary circuits.


All citations are hereby incorporated by reference.


The present invention has been described with regard to one or more embodiments. However, it will be apparent to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of real-time calibration for a display array having a plurality of pixel circuits arranged in rows and columns, the method comprising: generating a priority list of pixels;associating calibration priorities with a plurality of pixel circuits from the pixel circuits of the display array;selecting one or more pixels (n) from the priority list, the n selected pixels having the highest calibration priorities of a set of pixels in the priority list;programming each of the n selected pixels with a respective driving voltage;determining calibration information for each of the n selected pixels based on their respective driving voltages;updating a compensation voltage of the n selected pixels stored in a memory based on the determined calibration information; andresponsive to updating the compensation voltage, updating the priority list.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: enabling a calibration mode for each of the n selected pixels; andenabling normal operation mode for others of the pixels in the display array being programmed.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising programming the pixels in the normal operation mode based on the calibration information stored in the memory and programming data representing the driving voltage.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the corresponding driving voltage of each of the pixels is based on a programming voltage of the corresponding pixel and the compensation voltage of the corresponding pixel stored in the memory.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the priority list is an ordered list with the highest calibration priority pixel at the top, and wherein the updating the priority list includes moving at least one of the n selected pixels to the bottom of the priority list.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the calibration information includes comparing the pixel current of each of the n selected pixels with an expected current for each of the n selected pixels.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the display array is an AMOLED array and wherein the pixel circuit includes an organic light emitting diode and at least one n-type or p-type thin film transistor.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the n selected pixels from the priority list have a programming current above a threshold current (Ith).
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the generating the priority list includes associating the calibration priorities with the plurality of pixel circuits from the pixel circuits of the display array, the plurality of pixel circuits having a programming current above a threshold current (Ith).
  • 10. A system for a display array having a pixel circuit, the pixel circuit being programmed through a data line, the system comprising: a data source providing a programming data into the pixel circuit;a current-controlled voltage source converting a current on a data line to a voltage associated with the current to extract a time-dependent parameter of the pixel circuit;a data process and calibration unit controlling a driver to drive the pixel circuit according to at least the programming data, the data process and calibration unit receiving the time-dependent parameter extracted from the pixel circuit; anda calibration memory storing a calibration value for the pixel circuit to compensate for the time-dependent parameter and calibrate the programming data based on the time-dependent parameter.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the pixel circuit includes a driving transistor connected in series with a light emitting device, and wherein the extracted time-dependent parameter includes a threshold voltage of the driving transistor.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the extracted time dependent parameter of the pixel circuit also includes a turn on voltage of the light emitting device.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the programming data provided to the pixel circuit via the data source is modified according to the extracted time dependent parameter.
  • 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the pixel circuit is programmed via a voltage modified according to the extracted time dependent parameter.
  • 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the pixel circuit includes a driving transistor connected in series with a light emitting device, a storage capacitor connected to a gate terminal of the driving transistor, and wherein the pixel circuit is programmed by applying the programming voltage on the data line, via the current conveyor, the programming voltage corresponding to the programming data, and wherein the pixel circuit is configured such that the current on the data line, conveyed to the current-controlled voltage source via the current conveyor, is the current through the driving transistor while the programming voltage is applied.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the extracted time dependent parameter is a threshold voltage of the driving transistor and is determined according to a function including the voltage associated with the current provided by the current-controlled voltage source and the programming voltage.
  • 17. The system of claim 10, wherein the data source is operated to calibrate a subsequent programming voltage according to the extracted time dependent parameter.
  • 18. The system of claim 10, wherein the system implements, to pixel circuits in each row of the display array, an extraction operation for extracting the time-dependent parameter of the pixel circuits during a frame time.
  • 19. The system of claim 10, wherein the pixel circuit includes: a first switch transistor connected to the data line conveying the programming and calibration data from the data source; anda second switch transistor connected to a monitor line conveying the current or voltage to the data process and calibration unit.
  • 20. The system of claim 10, wherein the data source is incorporated in the data process and calibration unit.
  • 21. The system of claim 10, wherein the display array is an AMOLED display.
  • 22. A system for a display array including a plurality of pixel circuits arranged in a plurality of rows, each pixel circuit including a driving transistor, at least one switch transistor, a storage capacitor and a light emitting device, the system comprising: a monitor for monitoring a current or voltage associated with each of the plurality of pixel circuits;a driver for providing respective programming data and calibration data to each of the plurality of pixel circuits; anda data process unit for controlling the driver to operate the display array, the data process unit extracting a time dependent parameter of each of at least some of the plurality of pixel circuits, based on the monitored current or voltage, andwherein the system implements, to pixel circuits in each row of the display array:an extraction operation for extracting the time dependent parameter of each of the pixel circuits in the row, the calibration data being based on the extracted time dependent parameter,a programming operation for programming each of the pixel circuits in the row according to at least the programming data, anda driving operation for driving each of the pixel circuits in the row based on at least the programming data and the calibration data.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the time dependent parameter is (a) a shift in a characteristic of the driving transistor or the light emitting device or (b) a degradation of the light emitting device.
  • 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the characteristic is a threshold voltage of the driving transistor or a current or voltage of the light emitting device.
  • 25. The system of claim 23, wherein the degradation of the light emitting device is determined by measuring a voltage or current of the light emitting device.
  • 26. The system of claim 22, wherein the time dependent parameter is an aging of the driving transistor or the light emitting device.
  • 27. The system of claim 22, wherein the extraction operation is carried out by determining a voltage or current of the light emitting device to extract aging information of the pixel circuit.
  • 28. The system of claim 22, wherein the extraction operation is carried out during the programming operation or during the driving operation.
  • 29. The system of claim 28, wherein the extraction operation is carried out using the same line that the programming operation uses to program each of the pixel circuits in the row or using a separate line from that used by the programming cycle to program each of the pixel circuits in the row.
  • 30. The system of claim 22, wherein the system implements the extraction operation, the programming operation, and the driving operation sequentially.
Priority Claims (4)
Number Date Country Kind
2490860 Dec 2004 CA national
2503237 Apr 2005 CA national
2509201 Jun 2005 CA national
2521986 Oct 2005 CA national
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/157,031, filed Jan. 16, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/568,784, filed Aug. 7, 2012, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/571,968, filed Oct. 1, 2009, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,259,044, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/304,162, filed Dec. 15, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,619,597, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119 to (1) Canadian Patent No. 2,490,860, filed Dec. 15, 2004, and to (2) Canadian Patent No. 2,503,237, filed Apr. 8, 2005, and to (3) Canadian Patent No. 2,509,201, filed Jun. 8, 2005, and to (4) Canadian Patent No. 2,521,986, filed Oct. 17, 2005, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their respective entireties.

US Referenced Citations (424)
Number Name Date Kind
3506851 Polkinghorn et al. Apr 1970 A
3774055 Bapat et al. Nov 1973 A
4090096 Nagami May 1978 A
4160934 Kirsch Jul 1979 A
4354162 Wright Oct 1982 A
4943956 Noro Jul 1990 A
4996523 Bell et al. Feb 1991 A
5153420 Hack et al. Oct 1992 A
5198803 Shie et al. Mar 1993 A
5204661 Hack et al. Apr 1993 A
5266515 Robb et al. Nov 1993 A
5489918 Mosier Feb 1996 A
5498880 Lee et al. Mar 1996 A
5572444 Lentz et al. Nov 1996 A
5589847 Lewis Dec 1996 A
5619033 Weisfield Apr 1997 A
5648276 Hara et al. Jul 1997 A
5670973 Bassetti et al. Sep 1997 A
5691783 Numao et al. Nov 1997 A
5714968 Ikeda Feb 1998 A
5723950 Wei et al. Mar 1998 A
5744824 Kousai et al. Apr 1998 A
5745660 Kolpatzik et al. Apr 1998 A
5748160 Shieh et al. May 1998 A
5815303 Berlin Sep 1998 A
5870071 Kawahata Feb 1999 A
5874803 Garbuzov et al. Feb 1999 A
5880582 Sawada Mar 1999 A
5903248 Irwin May 1999 A
5917280 Burrows et al. Jun 1999 A
5923794 McGrath et al. Jul 1999 A
5945972 Okumura et al. Aug 1999 A
5949398 Kim Sep 1999 A
5952789 Stewart et al. Sep 1999 A
5952991 Akiyama Sep 1999 A
5982104 Sasaki et al. Nov 1999 A
5990629 Yamada et al. Nov 1999 A
6023259 Howard et al. Feb 2000 A
6069365 Chow et al. May 2000 A
6091203 Kawashima et al. Jul 2000 A
6097360 Holloman Aug 2000 A
6144222 Ho Nov 2000 A
6177915 Beeteson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6229506 Dawson et al. May 2001 B1
6229508 Kane May 2001 B1
6246180 Nishigaki Jun 2001 B1
6252248 Sano et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259424 Kurogane Jul 2001 B1
6262589 Tamukai Jul 2001 B1
6271825 Greene et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288696 Holloman Sep 2001 B1
6304039 Appelberg et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307322 Dawson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310962 Chung et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320325 Cok et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323631 Juang Nov 2001 B1
6356029 Hunter Mar 2002 B1
6373454 Knapp et al. Apr 2002 B1
6392617 Gleason May 2002 B1
6414661 Shen et al. Jul 2002 B1
6417825 Stewart et al. Jul 2002 B1
6433488 Bu Aug 2002 B1
6437106 Stoner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445369 Yang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475845 Kimura Nov 2002 B2
6501098 Yamazaki Dec 2002 B2
6501466 Yamagishi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522315 Ozawa et al. Feb 2003 B2
6525683 Gu Feb 2003 B1
6531827 Kawashima Mar 2003 B2
6542138 Shannon et al. Apr 2003 B1
6580408 Bae et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580657 Sanford et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583398 Harkin Jun 2003 B2
6583775 Sekiya et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594606 Everitt Jul 2003 B2
6618030 Kane et al. Sep 2003 B2
6639244 Yamazaki et al. Oct 2003 B1
6668645 Gilmour et al. Dec 2003 B1
6677713 Sung Jan 2004 B1
6680580 Sung Jan 2004 B1
6687266 Ma et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690000 Muramatsu et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690344 Takeuchi et al. Feb 2004 B1
6693388 Oomura Feb 2004 B2
6693610 Shannon et al. Feb 2004 B2
6697057 Koyama et al. Feb 2004 B2
6720942 Lee et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724151 Yoo Apr 2004 B2
6734636 Sanford et al. May 2004 B2
6738034 Kaneko et al. May 2004 B2
6738035 Fan May 2004 B1
6753655 Shih et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753834 Mikami et al. Jun 2004 B2
6756741 Li Jun 2004 B2
6756952 Decaux et al. Jun 2004 B1
6756958 Furuhashi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6771028 Winters Aug 2004 B1
6777712 Sanford et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777888 Kondo Aug 2004 B2
6781567 Kimura Aug 2004 B2
6806497 Jo Oct 2004 B2
6806638 Lin et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806857 Sempel et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809706 Shimoda Oct 2004 B2
6815975 Nara et al. Nov 2004 B2
6828950 Koyama Dec 2004 B2
6853371 Miyajima et al. Feb 2005 B2
6859193 Yumoto Feb 2005 B1
6873117 Ishizuka Mar 2005 B2
6876346 Anzai et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885356 Hashimoto Apr 2005 B2
6900485 Lee May 2005 B2
6903734 Eu Jun 2005 B2
6909243 Inukai Jun 2005 B2
6909419 Zavracky et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911960 Yokoyama Jun 2005 B1
6911964 Lee et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914448 Jinno Jul 2005 B2
6919871 Kwon Jul 2005 B2
6924602 Komiya Aug 2005 B2
6937215 Lo Aug 2005 B2
6937220 Kitaura et al. Aug 2005 B2
6940214 Komiya et al. Sep 2005 B1
6943500 LeChevalier Sep 2005 B2
6947022 McCartney Sep 2005 B2
6954194 Matsumoto et al. Oct 2005 B2
6956547 Bae et al. Oct 2005 B2
6975142 Azami et al. Dec 2005 B2
6975332 Arnold et al. Dec 2005 B2
6995510 Murakami et al. Feb 2006 B2
6995519 Arnold et al. Feb 2006 B2
7023408 Chen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027015 Booth, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027078 Reihl Apr 2006 B2
7034793 Sekiya et al. Apr 2006 B2
7038392 Libsch et al. May 2006 B2
7057359 Hung et al. Jun 2006 B2
7061451 Kimura Jun 2006 B2
7064733 Cok et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071932 Libsch et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088051 Cok Aug 2006 B1
7088052 Kimura Aug 2006 B2
7102378 Kuo et al. Sep 2006 B2
7106285 Naugler Sep 2006 B2
7112820 Change et al. Sep 2006 B2
7116058 Lo et al. Oct 2006 B2
7119493 Fryer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7122835 Ikeda et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127380 Iverson et al. Oct 2006 B1
7129914 Knapp et al. Oct 2006 B2
7164417 Cok Jan 2007 B2
7193589 Yoshida et al. Mar 2007 B2
7224332 Cok May 2007 B2
7227519 Kawase et al. Jun 2007 B1
7245277 Ishizuka Jul 2007 B2
7248236 Nathan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7262753 Tanghe et al. Aug 2007 B2
7274363 Ishizuka et al. Sep 2007 B2
7310092 Imamura Dec 2007 B2
7315295 Kimura Jan 2008 B2
7321348 Cok et al. Jan 2008 B2
7339560 Sun Mar 2008 B2
7355574 Leon et al. Apr 2008 B1
7358941 Ono et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368868 Sakamoto May 2008 B2
7411571 Huh Aug 2008 B2
7414600 Nathan et al. Aug 2008 B2
7423617 Giraldo et al. Sep 2008 B2
7474285 Kimura Jan 2009 B2
7502000 Yuki et al. Mar 2009 B2
7528812 Tsuge et al. May 2009 B2
7535449 Miyazawa May 2009 B2
7554512 Steer Jun 2009 B2
7569849 Nathan et al. Aug 2009 B2
7576718 Miyazawa Aug 2009 B2
7580012 Kim et al. Aug 2009 B2
7589707 Chou Sep 2009 B2
7609239 Chang Oct 2009 B2
7619594 Hu Nov 2009 B2
7619597 Nathan et al. Nov 2009 B2
7633470 Kane Dec 2009 B2
7656370 Schneider et al. Feb 2010 B2
7800558 Routley et al. Sep 2010 B2
7847764 Cok et al. Dec 2010 B2
7859492 Kohno Dec 2010 B2
7868859 Tomida et al. Jan 2011 B2
7876294 Sasaki et al. Jan 2011 B2
7924249 Nathan et al. Apr 2011 B2
7932883 Klompenhouwer et al. Apr 2011 B2
7969390 Yoshida Jun 2011 B2
7978187 Nathan et al. Jul 2011 B2
7994712 Sung et al. Aug 2011 B2
8026876 Nathan et al. Sep 2011 B2
8049420 Tamura et al. Nov 2011 B2
8077123 Naugler, Jr. Dec 2011 B2
8115707 Nathan et al. Feb 2012 B2
8223177 Nathan et al. Jul 2012 B2
8232939 Nathan et al. Jul 2012 B2
8259044 Nathan et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264431 Bulovic et al. Sep 2012 B2
8279143 Nathan et al. Oct 2012 B2
8339386 Leon et al. Dec 2012 B2
20010002703 Koyama Jun 2001 A1
20010009283 Arao et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010024181 Kubota Sep 2001 A1
20010024186 Kane et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010026257 Kimura Oct 2001 A1
20010030323 Ikeda Oct 2001 A1
20010040541 Yoneda et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010043173 Troutman Nov 2001 A1
20010045929 Prache Nov 2001 A1
20010052606 Sempel et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010052940 Hagihara et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020000576 Inukai Jan 2002 A1
20020011796 Koyama Jan 2002 A1
20020011799 Kimura Jan 2002 A1
20020012057 Kimura Jan 2002 A1
20020014851 Tai et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020018034 Ohki et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020030190 Ohtani et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020047565 Nara et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052086 Maeda May 2002 A1
20020067134 Kawashima Jun 2002 A1
20020084463 Sanford et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020101172 Bu Aug 2002 A1
20020105279 Kimura Aug 2002 A1
20020117722 Osada et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122308 Ikeda Sep 2002 A1
20020158587 Komiya Oct 2002 A1
20020158666 Azami et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020158823 Zavracky et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020167474 Everitt Nov 2002 A1
20020180369 Koyama Dec 2002 A1
20020180721 Kimura et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020186214 Siwinski Dec 2002 A1
20020190924 Asano et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020190971 Nakamura et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020195967 Kim et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020195968 Sanford et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030020413 Oomura Jan 2003 A1
20030030603 Shimoda Feb 2003 A1
20030043088 Booth et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030057895 Kimura Mar 2003 A1
20030058226 Bertram et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030062524 Kimura Apr 2003 A1
20030063081 Kimura et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030071821 Sundahl et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076048 Rutherford Apr 2003 A1
20030090447 Kimura May 2003 A1
20030090481 Kimura May 2003 A1
20030107560 Yumoto et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111966 Mikami et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030122745 Miyazawa Jul 2003 A1
20030122813 Ishizuki et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142088 LeChevalier Jul 2003 A1
20030151569 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156101 Le Chevalier Aug 2003 A1
20030174152 Noguchi Sep 2003 A1
20030179626 Sanford et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030197663 Lee et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210256 Mori et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030230141 Gilmour et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030230980 Forrest et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030231148 Lin et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040032382 Cok et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040066357 Kawasaki Apr 2004 A1
20040070557 Asano et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040070565 Nayar et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040090186 Kanauchi et al. May 2004 A1
20040090400 Yoo May 2004 A1
20040095297 Libsch et al. May 2004 A1
20040100427 Miyazawa May 2004 A1
20040108518 Jo Jun 2004 A1
20040135749 Kondakov et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145547 Oh Jul 2004 A1
20040150592 Mizukoshi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040150594 Koyama et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040150595 Kasai Aug 2004 A1
20040155841 Kasai Aug 2004 A1
20040174347 Sun et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174354 Ono et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040178743 Miller et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040183759 Stevenson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040196275 Hattori Oct 2004 A1
20040207615 Yumoto Oct 2004 A1
20040239596 Ono et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040252089 Ono et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257313 Kawashima et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257353 Imamura et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257355 Naugler Dec 2004 A1
20040263437 Hattori Dec 2004 A1
20040263444 Kimura Dec 2004 A1
20040263445 Inukai et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263541 Takeuchi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050007355 Miura Jan 2005 A1
20050007357 Yamashita et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050017650 Fryer et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024081 Kuo et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050024393 Kondo et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050030267 Tanghe et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050057484 Diefenbaugh et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057580 Yamano et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050067970 Libsch et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050067971 Kane Mar 2005 A1
20050068270 Awakura Mar 2005 A1
20050068275 Kane Mar 2005 A1
20050073264 Matsumoto Apr 2005 A1
20050083323 Suzuki et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050088103 Kageyama et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050110420 Arnold et al. May 2005 A1
20050110807 Chang May 2005 A1
20050140598 Kim et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050140610 Smith et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050145891 Abe Jul 2005 A1
20050156831 Yamazaki et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168416 Hashimoto et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050179626 Yuki et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050179628 Kimura Aug 2005 A1
20050185200 Tobol Aug 2005 A1
20050200575 Kim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050206590 Sasaki et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050219184 Zehner et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050248515 Naugler et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050269959 Uchino et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050269960 Ono et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280615 Cok et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050280766 Johnson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050285822 Reddy et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050285825 Eom et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060001613 Routley et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060007072 Choi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012310 Chen et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060012311 Ogawa Jan 2006 A1
20060027807 Nathan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060030084 Young Feb 2006 A1
20060038758 Routley et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060038762 Chou Feb 2006 A1
20060066533 Sato et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060077135 Cok et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060082523 Guo et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060092185 Jo et al. May 2006 A1
20060097628 Suh et al. May 2006 A1
20060097631 Lee May 2006 A1
20060103611 Choi May 2006 A1
20060149493 Sambandan et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060170623 Naugler, Jr. et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060176250 Nathan et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060208961 Nathan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060232522 Roy et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060244697 Lee et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060261841 Fish Nov 2006 A1
20060273997 Nathan et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060284801 Yoon et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060284895 Marcu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060290618 Goto Dec 2006 A1
20070001937 Park et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070001939 Hashimoto et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070008268 Park et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070008297 Bassetti Jan 2007 A1
20070057873 Uchino et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070069998 Naugler et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070075727 Nakano et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070076226 Klompenhouwer et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070080905 Takahara Apr 2007 A1
20070080906 Tanabe Apr 2007 A1
20070080908 Nathan et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070097038 Yamazaki et al. May 2007 A1
20070097041 Park et al. May 2007 A1
20070103419 Uchino et al. May 2007 A1
20070115221 Buchhauser et al. May 2007 A1
20070182671 Nathan et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070236517 Kimpe Oct 2007 A1
20070241999 Lin Oct 2007 A1
20070273294 Nagayama Nov 2007 A1
20070285359 Ono Dec 2007 A1
20070290958 Cok Dec 2007 A1
20070296672 Kim et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080001525 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080001544 Murakami et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080036708 Shirasaki Feb 2008 A1
20080042942 Takahashi Feb 2008 A1
20080042948 Yamashita et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080048951 Naugler, Jr. et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055209 Cok Mar 2008 A1
20080074413 Ogura Mar 2008 A1
20080088549 Nathan et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080088648 Nathan et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080117144 Nakano et al. May 2008 A1
20080150847 Kim et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080158115 Cordes et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231558 Naugler Sep 2008 A1
20080231562 Kwon Sep 2008 A1
20080252571 Hente et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080290805 Yamada et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080297055 Miyake et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090058772 Lee Mar 2009 A1
20090160743 Tomida et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090174628 Wang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090184901 Kwon Jul 2009 A1
20090195483 Naugler, Jr. et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090201281 Routley et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090213046 Nam Aug 2009 A1
20100004891 Ahlers et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026725 Smith Feb 2010 A1
20100039422 Seto Feb 2010 A1
20100060911 Marcu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100165002 Ahn Jul 2010 A1
20100194670 Cok Aug 2010 A1
20100207960 Kimpe et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100277400 Jeong Nov 2010 A1
20100315319 Cok et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110069051 Nakamura et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110069089 Kopf et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110074750 Leon et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110149166 Botzas et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110227964 Chaji et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110273399 Lee Nov 2011 A1
20110293480 Mueller Dec 2011 A1
20120056558 Toshiya et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062565 Fuchs et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120299978 Chaji Nov 2012 A1
20130027381 Nathan et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130057595 Nathan et al. Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (108)
Number Date Country
1 294 034 Jan 1992 CA
2 109 951 Nov 1992 CA
2 249 592 Jul 1998 CA
2 368 386 Sep 1999 CA
2 242 720 Jan 2000 CA
2 354 018 Jun 2000 CA
2 432 530 Jul 2002 CA
2 436 451 Aug 2002 CA
2 438 577 Aug 2002 CA
2 463 653 Jan 2004 CA
2 498 136 Mar 2004 CA
2 522 396 Nov 2004 CA
2 443 206 Mar 2005 CA
2 472 671 Dec 2005 CA
2 567 076 Jan 2006 CA
2 526 782 Apr 2006 CA
2 550 102 Apr 2008 CA
1381032 Nov 2002 CN
1448908 Oct 2003 CN
1760945 Apr 2006 CN
0 158 366 Oct 1985 EP
1 028 471 Aug 2000 EP
1 111 577 Jun 2001 EP
1 130 565 Sep 2001 EP
1 194 013 Apr 2002 EP
1 335 430 Aug 2003 EP
1 372 136 Dec 2003 EP
1 381 019 Jan 2004 EP
1 418 566 May 2004 EP
1 429 312 Jun 2004 EP
1 465 143 Oct 2004 EP
1 469 448 Oct 2004 EP
1 521 203 Apr 2005 EP
1 594 347 Nov 2005 EP
1 784 055 May 2007 EP
1854338 Nov 2007 EP
1 879 169 Jan 2008 EP
1 879 172 Jan 2008 EP
2 389 951 Dec 2003 GB
1272298 Oct 1989 JP
4-042619 Feb 1992 JP
6-314977 Nov 1994 JP
8-340243 Dec 1996 JP
09-090405 Apr 1997 JP
10-254410 Sep 1998 JP
11-202295 Jul 1999 JP
11-219146 Aug 1999 JP
11 231805 Aug 1999 JP
11-282419 Oct 1999 JP
2000-056847 Feb 2000 JP
2000-81607 Mar 2000 JP
2001-134217 May 2001 JP
2001-195014 Jul 2001 JP
2002-055654 Feb 2002 JP
2002-91376 Mar 2002 JP
2002-514320 May 2002 JP
2002-278513 Sep 2002 JP
2002-333862 Nov 2002 JP
2003-076331 Mar 2003 JP
2003-124519 Apr 2003 JP
2003-177709 Jun 2003 JP
2003-271095 Sep 2003 JP
2003-308046 Oct 2003 JP
2003-317944 Nov 2003 JP
2004-145197 May 2004 JP
2004-287345 Oct 2004 JP
2005-057217 Mar 2005 JP
4-158570 Oct 2008 JP
2004-0100887 Dec 2004 KR
342486 Oct 1998 TW
473622 Jan 2002 TW
485337 May 2002 TW
502233 Sep 2002 TW
538650 Jun 2003 TW
1221268 Sep 2004 TW
1223092 Nov 2004 TW
200727247 Jul 2007 TW
WO 9848403 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9948079 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0106484 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0127910 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0163587 Aug 2001 WO
WO 02067327 Aug 2002 WO
WO 03001496 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03034389 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03058594 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03-063124 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03077231 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004003877 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004025615 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004034364 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004047058 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004104975 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005022498 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005022500 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029455 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029456 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005055185 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2006000101 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006053424 May 2006 WO
WO 2006063448 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006084360 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007003877 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007079572 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007120849 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2009055920 May 2009 WO
WO 2010023270 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2011041224 Apr 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (116)
Entry
Ahnood et al.: “Effect of threshold voltage instability on field effect mobility in thin film transistors deduced from constant current measurements”; dated Aug. 2009.
Alexander et al.: “Pixel circuits and drive schemes for glass and elastic AMOLED displays”; dated Jul. 2005 (9 pages).
Alexander et al.: “Unique Electrical Measurement Technology for Compensation, Inspection, and Process Diagnostics of AMOLED HDTV”; dated May 2010 (4 pages).
Ashtiani et al.: “AMOLED Pixel Circuit With Electronic Compensation of Luminance Degradation”; dated Mar. 2007 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Current-Mode Comparator for Digital Calibration of Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Displays”; dated Jul. 2008 (5 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A fast settling current driver based on the CCII for AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2009 (6 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Low-Cost Stable Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Display with Full V˜T- and V˜O˜L˜E˜D Shift Compensation”; dated May 2007 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A low-power driving scheme for a-Si:H active-matrix organic light-emitting diode displays”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A low-power high-performance digital circuit for deep submicron technologies”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A novel a-Si:H AMOLED pixel circuit based on short-term stress stability of a-Si:H TFTs”; dated Oct. 2005 (3 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Novel Driving Scheme and Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Novel Driving Scheme for High Resolution Large-area a-SI:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (3 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Stable Voltage-Programmed Pixel Circuit for a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Dec. 2006 (12 pages).
Chaji et al.: “A Sub-μA fast-settling current-programmed pixel circuit for AMOLED displays”; dated Sep. 2007.
Chaji et al.: “An Enhanced and Simplified Optical Feedback Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2006.
Chaji et al.: “Compensation technique for DC and transient instability of thin film transistor circuits for large-area devices”; dated Aug. 2008.
Chaji et al.: “Driving scheme for stable operation of 2-TFT a-Si AMOLED pixel”; dated Apr. 2005 (2 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Dynamic-effect compensating technique for stable a-Si:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Electrical Compensation of OLED Luminance Degradation”; dated Dec. 2007 (3 pages).
Chaji et al.: “eUTDSP: a design study of a new VLIW-based DSP architecture”; dated My 2003 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Fast and Offset-Leakage Insensitive Current-Mode Line Driver for Active Matrix Displays and Sensors”; dated Feb. 2009 (8 pages).
Chaji et al.: “High Speed Low Power Adder Design With a New Logic Style: Pseudo Dynamic Logic (SDL)”; dated Oct. 2001 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “High-precision, fast current source for large-area current-programmed a-Si flat panels”; dated Sep. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Low-Cost AMOLED Television with IGNIS Compensating Technology”; dated May 2008 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Low-Cost Stable a-Si:H AMOLED Display for Portable Applications”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Low-Power Low-Cost Voltage-Programmed a-Si:H AMOLED Display”; dated Jun. 2008 (5 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Merged phototransistor pixel with enhanced near infrared response and flicker noise reduction for biomolecular imaging”; dated Nov. 2008 (3 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Parallel Addressing Scheme for Voltage-Programmed Active-Matrix OLED Displays”; dated May 2007 (6 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Pseudo dynamic logic (SDL): a high-speed and low-power dynamic logic family”; dated 2002 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Stable a-Si:H circuits based on short-term stress stability of amorphous silicon thin film transistors”; dated May 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Stable Pixel Circuit for Small-Area High-Resolution a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2008 (6 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Stable RGBW AMOLED display with OLED degradation compensation using electrical feedback”; dated Feb. 2010 (2 pages).
Chaji et al.: “Thin-Film Transistor Integration for Biomedical Imaging and AMOLED Displays”; dated 2008 (177 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 01 11 22313 dated Sep. 14, 2005 (4 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6661 dated Mar. 9, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 75 9141 dated Oct. 30, 2009 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 81 9617 dated Jan. 30, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 70 5133 dated Jul. 18, 2008.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 72 1798 dated Nov. 12, 2009 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 0608.6 dated Mar. 19, 2010 (7 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 9579 dated May 20, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 81 5784 dated Jul. 20, 2010 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 16 6143, dated Sep. 3, 2010 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 83 4294.0/1903, dated Apr. 8, 2013, (9 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 73 9485.8-1904 dated Aug. 6, 2013, (14 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2006/000177 dated Jun. 2, 2006.
European Supplementary Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6662 dated Jan. 19, 2007 (2 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11 73 9485.8 mailed Aug. 6, 2013(14 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 09 73 3076.5, mailed Apr. 27, (13 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 16 8677.0, mailed Nov. 29, 2012, (13 page).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7 mailed Jul. 11, 2012 (14 pages).
Fossum, Eric R.. “Active Pixel Sensors: Are CCD's Dinosaurs?” SPIE: Symposium on Electronic Imaging. Feb. 1, 1993 (13 pages).
Goh et al., “A New a-Si:H Thin-Film Transistor Pixel Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diodes”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2003, pp. 583-585.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 16, 2006, 4 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001741 dated Feb. 21, 2005.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742, Canadian Patent Office, dated Feb. 21, 2005 (2 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 18, 2005.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897, mailed Mar. 21, 2006 (2 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2007/000652 dated Jul. 25, 2007.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501, mailed Jul. 30, 2009 (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/001769, dated Apr. 8, 2010 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486, Dated Apr. 19, 2011, 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541 filed Dec. 1, 2010, dated May 26, 2011; 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502, dated Jun. 27, 2011 (6 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103, dated Jul. 8, 2011, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135, Canadian Patent Office, dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372, mailed Sep. 12, 2012 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Sep. 11, 2013; (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/JP02/09668, mailed Dec. 3, 2002, (4 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742, Canadian Patent Office, dated Feb. 21, 2005 (5 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897, mailed Mar. 21, 2006 (4 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501 mailed Jul. 30, 2009 (6 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486, Dated Apr. 19, 2011, 8 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541, dated May 26, 2011; 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502, dated Jun. 27, 2011 (7 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103, dated Jul. 8, 2011, 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135, Canadian Patent Office, dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372, mailed Sep. 12, 2012 (6 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Sep. 11, 2013; (5 pages).
Jafarabadiashtiani et al.: “A New Driving Method for a-Si AMOLED Displays Based on Voltage Feedback”; dated 2005 (4 pages).
Kanicki, J., et al. “Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Transistors Based Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays.” Asia Display: International Display Workshops, Sep. 2001 (pp. 315-318).
Karim, K. S., et al. “Amorphous Silicon Active Pixel Sensor Readout Circuit for Digital Imaging.” IEEE: Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 50, No. 1, Jan. 2003 (pp. 200-208).
Lee et al.: “Ambipolar Thin-Film Transistors Fabricated by PECVD Nanocrystalline Silicon”; dated 2006.
Lee, Wonbok: “Thermal Management in Microprocessor Chips and Dynamic Backlight Control in Liquid Crystal Displays”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California (124 pages).
Ma E Y et al.: “organic light emitting diode/thin film transistor integration for foldable displays” dated Sep. 15, 1997(4 pages).
Matsueda y et al.: “35.1: 2.5-in. AMOLED with Integrated 6-bit Gamma Compensated Digital Data Driver”; dated May 2004.
Mendes E., et al. “A High Resolution Switch-Current Memory Base Cell.” IEEE: Circuits and Systems. vol. 2, Aug. 1999 (pp. 718-721).
Nathan A. et al., “Thin Film imaging technology on glass and plastic” ICM 2000, proceedings of the 12 international conference on microelectronics, dated Oct. 31, 2001 (4 pages).
Nathan et al., “Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Transistor Circuit Integration for Organic LED Displays on Glass and Plastic”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1477-1486.
Nathan et al.: “Backplane Requirements for active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode Displays,”; dated 2006 (16 pages).
Nathan et al.: “Call for papers second international workshop on compact thin-film transistor (TFT) modeling for circuit simulation”; dated Sep. 2009 (1 page).
Nathan et al.: “Driving schemes for a-Si and LTPS AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2005 (11 pages).
Nathan et al.: “Invited Paper: a-Si for AMOLED—Meeting the Performance and Cost Demands of Display Applications (Cell Phone to HDTV)”, dated 2006 (4 pages).
Office Action in Japanese patent application No. JP2006-527247 dated Mar. 15, 2010. (8 pages).
Office Action in Japanese patent application No. JP2007-545796 dated Sep. 5, 2011. (8 pages).
Partial European Search Report for Application No. Ep 11 168 677.0, mailed Sep. 22, 2011 (5 pages).
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7, mailed Mar. 20, 2012 (8 pages).
Philipp: “Charge transfer sensing” Sensor Review, vol. 19, No. 2, Dec. 31, 1999, 10 pages.
Rafati et al.: “Comparison of a 17 b multiplier in Dual-rail domino and in Dual-rail D L (D L) logic styles”; dated 2002 (4 pages).
Safavian et al.: “3-TFT active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real-time medical x-ray imaging”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Safavian et al.: “A novel current scaling active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real time medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2007 (7 pages).
Safavian et al.: “A novel hybrid active-passive pixel with correlated double sampling CMOS readout circuit for medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2008 (4 pages).
Safavian et al.: “Self-compensated a-Si:H detector with current-mode readout circuit for digital X-ray fluoroscopy”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages).
Safavian et al.: “TFT active image sensor with current-mode readout circuit for digital x-ray fluoroscopy [5969D-82]”; dated Sep. 2005 (9 pages).
Safavian et al.: “Three-TFT image sensor for real-time digital X-ray imaging”; dated Feb. 2, 2006 (2 pages).
Search Report for Taiwan Invention Patent Application No. 093128894 dated May 1, 2012. (1 page).
Search Report for Taiwan Invention Patent Application No. 94144535 dated Nov. 1, 2012. (1 page).
Singh, et al., “Current Conveyor: Novel Universal Active Block”, Samriddhi, S-JPSET vol. I, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 41-48 (12EPPT).
Spindler et al., System Considerations for RGBW OLED Displays, Journal of the SID 14/1, 2006, pp. 37-48.
Stewart M. et al., “polysilicon TFT technology for active matrix oled displays” IEEE transactions on electron devices, vol. 48, No. 5, dated May 2001 (7 pages).
Vygranenko et al.: “Stability of indium-oxide thin-film transistors by reactive ion beam assisted deposition”; dated 2009.
Wang et al.: “Indium oxides by reactive ion beam assisted evaporation: From material study to device application”; dated Mar. 2009 (6 pages).
Yi He et al., “Current-Source a-Si:H Thin Film Transistor Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 590-592.
Yu, Jennifer: “Improve OLED Technology for Display”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sep. 2008 (151 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140168203 A1 Jun 2014 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 14157031 Jan 2014 US
Child 14175493 US
Parent 13568784 Aug 2012 US
Child 14157031 US
Parent 12571968 Oct 2009 US
Child 13568784 US
Parent 11304162 Dec 2005 US
Child 12571968 US