The invention relates to a microscope device with two-color detection capabilities.
Typically, camera detectors used in microscopy are monochrome.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,427,646 B2 relates to a microscope device having dual emission capability, wherein detrimental effects of image aberrations and image distortions are reduced by reflecting the first beam of the first spectral range in a manner so as to invert its handedness and reflecting the second beam of the second spectral range in a manner so as to preserve its handedness, thereby obtaining a fully symmetrical configuration, so that corresponding image points in both spectral channels all experience the same field dependent operations. This allows to image the two spectrally different images adjacent to each other onto the same chip of a given detector camera.
It is an object of the invention to provide for a microscope device capable of producing sample images with relatively high contrast.
According to the invention, this object is achieved by a microscope device as defined in claim 1.
The sample is illuminated with transmitted light of two different spectral ranges, which are directed to separate area-detectors. Congruent images on the two detectors are achieved by using a common tube lens for both spectral ranges, with the light of the two spectral ranges being separated by a dichroic beam splitter in the image beam paths between the tube lens and the detectors. The congruent images can be combined to generate a total sample image with enhanced contrast. By using a common tube lens for both beam paths, i.e. by separating the image beam path into two spectral arms in the finite optical space after the last lens system, the optical effects compromising congruence of the two image beam paths are greatly diminished compared to a configuration with separate tube lenses for each spectral arm. Such a configuration with separate tube lenses cannot result in congruent images, since lenses in practice are never exactly identical. Their focal lengths—and hence magnification will always differ, and optical imperfections lead to different distortions of two images.
Using a joint tube lens for both spectral arms reduces optical asymmetry, but cannot fully avoid it. A planar optical element (the dichroic beam splitter), passed at an angle greater 0° (as done by one of the two spectral arms), causes image distortions to that beam which increase with increasing angle and with substrate thickness. In order to separate incoming and reflected beam, the angle α between the incoming beam and the reflected beam should assume a finite value of at least 30° (the angle at which the beam splitter is passed by the incoming beam is half of the angle α between the incoming beam and the reflected beam, i.e. it is α/2). Reducing the substrate thickness, on the other hand, also works only to a certain degree, since the reflective coating tends to spoil the planarity of a given substrate, and the effect becomes more pronounced with decreasing substrate thickness. Thus, while reducing the substrate thickness would reduce the detrimental effect on the transmitted beam, it may result in an increased bending the substrate through the reflecting surface layer and hence compromise the reflected beam. A substrate-thickness of 1-2 mm at an angle α/2 of the dichroic beam splitter with regard to the incident (common) image beam of 12 to 18° is a good compromise, as illustrated in
Further preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
Hereinafter, examples of the invention will be illustrated by reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
In
The beam splitter 24 may be implemented as a long-pass filter (in this case the first spectral range would be at shorter wavelengths than the second spectral range), or it may be implemented as a short-pass (in this case the first spectral range would be at longer wavelengths than the second spectral range).
A blocking filter 36 (shown in
In order to minimize the remaining optical asymmetry between the transmitted image beam path 30 and the reflected image beam path 28, the beam splitter 24 should have a relatively low thickness of less than 2 mm, and preferably at least 1 mm, and should be inclined with respect to the common image beam path 26 at as flat an angle as separation of incoming and reflected beam permits. The latter requirement may be fulfilled by selecting the angle of the beam splitter 24 with regard to the incident beam 26 such that the angle α between the common incident beam 26 and the reflected image beam 28 lies between 24 and 36 degrees.
The blocking filter 36 should be inclined at about the same angle, for example, within ±3% with regard to the reflected image beam 28 as is the beam splitter 24 with regard to the common incident beam 26; further, the blocking filter 36 should have the same thickness as the beam splitter 24. Thereby the optical asymmetry between the reflected image beam 28 and the transmitted image beam 30 is further minimized, since in this case the reflected image beam 28 passes through a transmitting optical element (namely the blocking filter 36) which is very similar to the beam splitter 24 through which the transmitted image beam 30 is transmitted, so that the reflected image beam 28 is affected by such transmission in a manner very similar to the manner the transmitted image beam 30 is affected by the transmission through the beam splitter 24, Thereby, the resulting optical distortion is very similar for both the transmitted image beam 30 and the reflected image beam 28, so that the resulting images on the first detector 32 and the second detector 34, respectively, have a very similar point spread function (“PSF”), so that the resulting images will be congruent. In other words, the optical distortion resulting from transmission of the convergent beam through the beam splitter 24 on the one hand and the blocking filter 36 on the other hand will affect both spectral channels in the same manner.
In the example of
The first image obtained by the first camera 32, resulting from illumination of the sample 16 by light from the first light source 18, and the second image recorded by the second detector 34, obtained by illumination of the sample 16 with light from the second light source 20, are combined by an analyzer unit 44 in a manner so as to increase the contrast compared to the case of a single oblique transmission illumination (i.e., illumination of the sample 16 only either with the first light source 18 or the second light source 20). One way to combine the first and second image would be to simply add the first and second image. However, a better contrast enhancement can be obtained by dividing the difference between the first image and the second image by the sum of the first image and the second image.
The dual color system illustrated above can also be used in an epi-illumination fluorescence microscope, which includes an epi-illumination light source 40 for illuminating the sample 16 via the microscope objective 12 so as to achieve fluorescence excitation (for example, a beam splitter 42 may be used for directing the epi-illumination light onto the microscope objective 12) wherein the fluorescence emission light from the sample 16 is collected by the microscope objective 12 and is focused by the tube lens 22 for being directed to at least one of the first detector 32 and the second detector 34 by using the dichroic beam splitter 24.
It is to be understood that the light sources 18, 20 and 40 may be integrated within a single light source or may by implements by different spectral ranges obtained from a multiband light source.
Thus, microscope devices like that shown in
It is noted that spectral splitting using two detectors also may be used for simultaneous imaging of two fluorophores or to separate two dyes in a transmitted light image, for example for a specimen dyed simultaneously with hematoxylin and eosin.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18189765 | Aug 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/071581 | 8/12/2019 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/038752 | 2/27/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11053540 | Chen | Jul 2021 | B1 |
20090103801 | Messier | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110081110 | Sullivan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130215261 | Rahmani | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150160451 | Staker | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20180210197 | Dave | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190269333 | Bodenschatz | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200264405 | Putman | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210165198 | Mueller-Rentz | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20170000647 | Jan 2017 | KR |
WO-0006980 | Feb 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sygene, UV Epi-illumination versus Transiliumnation, Application Note 05, p. 1 of 1 (Year: 2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210173203 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |