The present invention is explained in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The exemplary embodiments which are explained in more detail below constitute preferred embodiments of the present invention.
The speed control system according to the invention which is shown in
It is clear here that the lower value portion evlo corresponds approximately to that signal level which is caused by the interference variable rx. With the higher value portion the procedure adopted is as in the prior art according to
The signal output of the adder Sum1 is split into two signal paths. A limiter B is arranged in one of the signal paths. Said limiter limits the signal amplitude corresponding to a desired saturation function, for example
with a positive constant Q. The resulting signal evlo comprises only the lower value portions of the original signal ev. In an adder Sum5, the signal portion evlo is subtracted from the original signal ev, resulting in the higher value signal portion evhi. The higher value signal portion, which originates, for example, from a load change of the motor and thus corresponds to an actual change in the speed v, is fed in an unprocessed form to an adder Sum6. The lower value signal portions evlo are, on the other hand, filtered in a filter F before they are fed to the adder Sum6. The two signal portions are added again to form a common signal in the adder Sum6, and are fed to the controller R or its amplifier G1.
The limiter B ensures that the amplitude of the lower value portion evlo corresponds approximately to the signal portion which is brought about in the actual speed signal vist by the interference signal rx. For example the low pass filter TP from
Basically, it is also possible for the signal of the speed difference ev to be divided into more than two portions and for the nonlinear control in these portions to be carried out individually. Furthermore, it is also possible, as has already been mentioned above, to use an acceleration sensor in parallel with the position sensor in order to suppress noise or interference portions. In addition the signal transmitter G can also permit oversampling.
The nonlinear control step can also be carried out between the signal transmitter evaluation A and the adder Sum1 for the actual speed signal visit instead of before the control process R. Although this alternative is less advantageous, it is appropriate in existing control circuits in which, for example, only the actual speed signal vist is accessible.
The control mechanism according to the invention can also be used for position control. Said control can be built up in a customary way without conversion into speed signals. However, alternatively it can also be implemented by utilizing the speed control system from
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 016 733.8 | Apr 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/51221 | 3/16/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/7/2007 |