Patent Application
20100071708
This invention relates generally to a device and method of using said device for the protection of a user's hearing and also a secure means of retaining the device in an ear canal.
Noise-induced hearing loss (“NIHL”) is a debilitating condition that generally develops slowly and can severely affect an individual's ability to communicate. In some instances, however, hearing loss can be acute, especially when an individual is subjected to intense noises such as those occurring from the discharge of weaponry or concussive noises such as those from explosions. Additionally, the acute aftereffects of exposure to such noises can critically affect an individual's ability to function because of ear-ringing or other symptoms. For law-enforcement personnel or combat operatives, such affects can cause injury or the loss of life.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (“NIOSH”) suggests exposure to impulsive noises not exceed 140 dB SPL in one event per day. Because firearm discharges can range in intensity from about 140 dB to upwards of 170 dB, the likelihood of incurring NIHL for military or police personnel can be high. Some common means of preventing NIHL require a user to wear earmuffs, sometimes in addition to earplugs. While these devices can adequately protect a user's hearing, they also dampen critical sounds that would not result in NIHL. For example, a user would be protected from the NIHL resulting from a concussive round detonating nearby but would be unable to receive orders from another user because verbal sounds are attenuated as well. In addition, the Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) [Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Technical Manual, Washington, D.C.: U S Department of Labor, 2002] mandates hearing protection if the noise level is at or exceeds 90 dBA for eight hours. Hearing protection is usually instituted at noise levels of 85 dBA. Vocal conversation level is about 65 dBA.
Additionally, wind noise and other ambient sounds often affect the pleasure of listening to music via small transducers placed in the ear canals (earbuds) due to masking and distraction. The typical listener strategy is to increase the music volume, often at the risk of hearing loss to intense sound exposure. Additionally, the off-centre weight of earbuds eventually causes many to be dislodged from the ear canals, most frequently during vigorous exercise when the canal geometry changes in response to jaw movements.
As such, there is a need for a device which allows a user to hear critical noises such as speech but which also allows a user to be protected from noises that would cause NIHL. In addition, the device should function to retain its position in the ear canal under various conditions, including exercise.
A passive inexpensive level dependent hearing protection device (LDHPD) is described that suits military and police personnel's need for hearing protection with minimal interference with speech communication. The single-unit device is adapted to be simple to use and comfortable over hours of use. Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention, a passive level dependent hearing protection device for insertion into an ear canal is described comprising (a) a flexible bladder attached to a frame, said frame adapted to fit within the ear canal; (b) at least one one-way valve on said bladder adapted to release air; (c) at least one one-way valve on said frame adapted to help evacuate air from the ear canal; (d) a valve adapted to crack, to release air pressure, and/or to crack and release air pressure when a critical low air pressure condition in the ear canal is reached; and (e) a plug attached to said frame, said plug adapted to provide a seal when said plug is inserted into the ear canal. Further, various embodiments of the present invention also comprise a method of using the device. The device is used by (a) inserting said plug into the ear canal; (b) squeezing said bladder; (c) allowing said bladder to evacuate air from the ear canal by releasing the squeezing pressure on said bladder; and (d) removing said device when hearing protection is no longer needed. In another embodiment, the device may be inserted after the bladder has been squeezed but before the squeezing pressure has been removed. The device also incorporates a valve that releases the negative air-pressure when a set negative air-pressure is reached. The valve can accomplish this by “cracking”. Cracking is defined as encompassing the valve moving to an open state, the valve bursting, or any other movement which releases air into the vacuum created by the bladder. Finally, in an alternate embodiment, the device is adapted with a transducer and may or may not contain an aperture.
The present invention can best be understood in connection with the accompanying drawings. It is noted that the invention is not limited to the precise embodiments shown in drawings, in which:
50 Pump-Plug Hearing Protection Device; 100 Orifice; 102 Flexible Bladder; 104 Frame; 106 Closed Plug; 108 Silicone Valve; 110 One-Way Valve (Bladder); 112 One-Way Valve (To Ear-Canal); 114 Aperture; 200 Pinna; and 500 Transducer.
The current invention, in a preferred embodiment, provides protection from impact sounds by creating a negative pressure between the plug tip and the eardrum (preferably around −100 mm H2O or −1 k Pa). Squeezing the peripheral plug end, thereby evacuating a fixed amount of air from the canal, creates the negative pressure. A miniature one-way valve will maintain the pressure with an overpressure override for safety. In effect the “pump plug” will have a similar acoustical action on the eardrum as a normal stapedius muscle contraction, but without its limitations (too slow and fatigue) in the presence of impulse noise. The plug cannot be vented, as with the current U S Army plugs; however, because the venting attenuation reduction effect will be accomplished in addition to using a very compliant valve mechanism, passive transmission of mid and high frequency acoustics can occur through the presence of a small aperture passage. The dimensions of the device may be variable to allow for perfect fit in a variety of ear canals according to the dimensions of a specific user.
Again, the design principle is that a low negative pressure can be comfortably created in the canal which will produce the desired attenuation but which will also protect against low frequency steady state and impact noise. The valve system will act as a compliant window, much like a small air opening (venting). Further, a small aperture will connect the valve to ambient noise and pressure. The most effective aperture diameter, and thereby a preferred aperture diameter for optimal sound transmission, appears to be 0.010″. Other sizes may be employed. Thus the design will allow soft sounds, especially speech, to remain soft, but intense sounds will be attenuated. The LDHPD can be tunable in that more negative pressure can be applied depending on the bladder size of the plug. Wind noise is expected to be minimal due to the vacuum effect created by the bladder. Because the device is simple, only water cleaning is necessary to maintain the device.
The device can be best understood diagrammatically. Turning now to the figures,
With a negative pressure of −2 kPa the transmission loss is ˜20-25 dB. It is estimated that a negative pressure of −1 kPa (the preferred target for the proposed vacuum plug) would result in a transmission loss of about 15 dB. The vacuum effect is maximal in low frequencies for which noise from, e.g., low caliber arms fire will be reduced. The vacuum effect also maintains the earplug in the ear even with movement of the lower jaw, e.g., as in eating, etc. The vacuum also keeps the plug from moving as a result of sound exposure on the distal end. Without vacuum, earplugs loose their “seating” from the effects of sound pressure and become less effective, usually requiring re-insertion.
In an alternate embodiment, the ear assembly can be modified to include a transducer. In one sub-embodiment, the device functions to limit impact and other high intensity noises while also providing a transducer for audio signals. This would find application, for example, in battlefield communication applications, such as for transmitting a communication to a soldier in a high-noise environment. The transducer may be situated in a manner to retain the open-air aperture or, as in
In another sub-embodiment, the device can utilize a lower, i.e. closer to ambient, negative air-pressure, preferably around −1 kPa, to act as a securing means for the assembly into the ear. While impact noise would not be reduced to the same extent as at higher pressures, the device can be used for, e.g., recreational uses such as jogging or other activities in which the device might otherwise become dislodged without a securing means. The vacuum attenuates ambient noise (though to a lesser extent) and holds the earbud/plug in place, even during vigorous exercise. Squeezing the plug end, evacuating a fixed amount of air from the canal, will create the negative pressure.
In the foregoing description, certain terms and visual depictions are used to illustrate the preferred embodiment. However, no unnecessary limitations are to be construed by the terms used or illustrations depicted, beyond what is shown in the prior art, since the terms and illustrations are exemplary only, and are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention. It is further known that other modifications may be made to the present invention, without departing the scope of the invention, as noted in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 60/878,364 entitled “PUMPPLUG-NOVEL HEARING PROTECTION DEVICE AND METHOD” filed Jan. 4, 2007, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference. This application also claims the benefit of provisional patent application No. 60/878,368 entitled “SECURE EARBUD ASSEMBLY FOR LISTENING” filed Jan. 4, 2007, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US08/50243 | 1/4/2008 | WO | 00 | 7/3/2009 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60878364 | Jan 2007 | US | |
| 60878368 | Jan 2007 | US |
