Oil-resistant rubber composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 4421884
  • Patent Number
    4,421,884
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 4, 1982
    42 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 20, 1983
    41 years ago
Abstract
An oil-resistant rubber composition comprising 98 to 50 parts by weight of (1) a partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber in which at least 50% of units derived from the conjugated diene are hydrogenated, and 2 to 50 parts by weight of (2) a liquid copolymer having a number average molecular weight of 500 to 10,000 obtained by copolymerizing 10 to 80% by weight of a conjugated diene, 10 to 70% by weight of an unsaturated nitrile and 0 to 20% by weight of a vinyl monomer copolymerizable with these monomers, the total amount of the components (1) and (2) being 100 parts by weight.
Description

This invention relates to an oil-resistant rubber composition having excellent solvent crack resistance comprising a partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber and a liquid unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer.
Generally, a phenomenon in which a polymeric substance develops cracks on contact with a solvent and the cracks then grow is known as solvent crack. It is often observed that when a vulcanized rubber comes into contact with solvent, it undergoes breakage within a short period of time even at such a low stretch which in the air would not easily break it. The occurrence of this phenomenon is a particularly serious problem with rubber component parts of automobiles, especially fuel hoses used in contact with gasoline, from the viewpoint of safety.
With a social demand for lead-free gasoline in recent years, the proportion of aromatic components in gasoline has been increased to increase its octane number. Rubber materials composed mainly of an acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubber are liable to undergo solvent crack upon contact with such gasoline, and this has created a problem in practical applications. In an attempt to solve this problem, various rubber compositions having improved solvent crack resistance have been suggested. A typical example is an oil-resistant rubber composition comprising a liquid copolymer obtained by copolymerizing acrylonitrile, butadiene (and/or isoprene) and an .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated carboxylic acid and an acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubber in (U.S. Pat. No. 3,790,646), which exhibits a particularly marked effect and is in commercial use.
There has been a worldwide movement toward obtaining energy from a multiplicity of resources by saving petroleum consumption and utilizing other natural resources. As one means of achieving this purpose, the use of a mixture of gasoline with an alcohol such as methanol or ethanol has been investigated in many countries of the world for use as automobile fuel, and it has already been put to practical use in America and Brazil. A typical new fuel is a mixture of gasoline and ethanol, which is called gasohol.
Our experimental work has shown that the rubber composition of the above-cited U.S. Patent comprising the acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymer and the liquid copolymer does not exhibit solvent crack resistance and is useless when used in contact with gasohol.
It is an object of this invention therefore to provide an oil-resistant rubber composition having excellent solvent crack resistance when used in contact with gasoline, particularly gasohol and various solvents such as aromatic solvents and alcohols.
According to this invention, there is provided as an oil-resistant rubber composition meeting this object, a composition comprising 98 to 50 parts by weight of (1) a partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber in which at least 50% of units derived from the conjugated diene are hydrogenated, and 2 to 50 parts by weight of (2) a liquid copolymer having a number average molecular weight of 500 to 10,000 obtained by copolymerizing 10 to 80% by weight of a conjugated diene, 10 to 70% by weight of an unsaturated nitrile and 0 to 20% by weight of a vinyl monomer copolymerizable with these monomers, the total amount of the components (1) and (2) being 100 parts by weight.
Since the composition of this invention also has excellent heat aging resistance in addition to its excellent solvent resistance, it also fully exhibits oil resistance and heat resistance under severe conditions, the properties which have been strongly required in recent years.
The partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber (1) used in this invention can be obtained by hydrogenating the conjugated diene units of an unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber produced by emulsion polymerization, solution polymerization, etc., by an ordinary hydrogenating method (for example, the methods described in British Pat. Nos. 1,198,195 and 1,558,491).
The copolymer rubber to be hydrogenated includes, for example, a copolymer rubber prepared from at least one unsaturated nitrile such as acrylonitrile or methacrylonitrile and at least one conjugated diene such as 1,3-butadiene, isoprene and 1,3-pentadiene; and a copolymer rubber prepared from an unsaturated nitrile, a conjugated diene and an unsaturated carboxylic acid ester (e.g., a methyl-, butyl- or 2-ethylhexyl-ester of acrylic, methacrylic, fumaric or itaconic acid) or an N-methylol alkylamide (such as N-methylol acrylamide). Specific examples are an acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubber, an acrylonitrile/isoprene copolymer rubber, an acrylonitrile/butadiene/isoprene copolymer rubber, and an acrylonitrile/butadiene/methyl acrylate copolymer rubber. The acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubber is especially preferred.
There is no particular restriction on the amount of the bound unsaturated nitrile in the copolymer rubber. Usually, it is 10 to 60% by weight, and can be determined depending upon the end use of the final composition or its state of use (in other words, depending upon the solvent with which it is to be contacted).
The degree of hydrogenation of the conjugated diene units in the copolymer rubber is at least 50%, preferably at least 70%. If it is less than 50%, only a slight improvement can be achieved in solvent crack resistance and heat resistance. If it exceeds 98%, however, vulcanization of the resulting composition with sulfur becomes so slow that it is not practical. When, however, the cross-liking is carried out by using an organic peroxide, the conjugated diene units may be hydrogenated to a degree of 100%.
In order that the liquid copolymer (2) has good compatibility with the copolymer rubber (1) and the final composition of this invention exhibits excellent solvent crack resistance and strength properties, the liquid copolymer (2) used in this invention should be one obtained by copolymerizing 10 to 70% by weight, preferably 20 to 50% by weight, of an unsaturated nitrile, 20 to 80% by weight, preferably 25 to 75% by weight, of a conjugated diene and 0 to 20% by weight, preferably 0.1 to 15% by weight, of a vinyl monomer copolymerizable with these monomers.
Examples of the unsaturated nitrile and the conjugated diene are the same as those given above with regard to the partially hydrogenated copolymer rubber. Acrylonitrile is especially preferred as the unsaturated nitrile, and butadiene and isoprene are especially preferred as the conjugated diene. Examples of the vinyl monomer copolymerizable with the unsaturated nitrile and the conjugated diene include unsaturated carboxylic acids or their esters, such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, itaconic acid, methyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate; vinylpyridine monomers such as 2-vinylpyridine; and N-methylol (C.sub.1-4 alkyl)amides such as N-methylol acrylamide. Acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are especially preferred.
The liquid copolymer (2) has a number average molecular weight of 500 to 10,000. If it is less than 500, the copolymer readily undergoes extraction with solvents, and improved solvent crack resistance cannot be obtained. It is exceeds 10,000, the solvent crack resistance of the resulting rubber composition is reduced. The preferred number average molecular weight is 1,000 to 5,000.
the liquid copolymer (2) can be easily obtained, for example, by using a large amount of a mercaptan such as t-dodecylmercaptan as a molecular weight modifier in a usual emulsion-polymerization process.
The rubber composition of this invention is obtained by mixing 98 to 50 parts by weight of the copolymer rubber (1) with 2 to 50 parts by weight of the liquid copolymer (2) so that the total amount of the polymers (1) and (2) is 100 parts by weight. If the amount of the liquid copolymer (2) is less than 2 parts by weight, no improvement in solvent crack resistance can be obtained. If it exceeds 50 parts by weight, the Mooney viscosity of the resulting composition is decreased and adversely affects such properties as compression set. These two components may be mixed in the state of latex, or in a solvent, or by means of a mixer such as a roll or Banbury mixer.
The rubber composition of this invention so prepared is vulcanized by usual methods such as sulfur cure or peroxide cure. Compounding ingredients usually employed in the rubber industry, such as reinforcing agents, fillers, softeners and antioxidants, may be added to the rubber composition of this invention in addition to a vulcanizer.
The rubber composition of this invention is very suitable for use in fuel hoses, steelmaking rolls, etc. which require solvent resistance and heat resistance, printing rolls, spinning rolls, papermaking rolls, dyeing rolls, etc. which require solvent resistance, and also as sealing materials such as oil seals, O-rings, diaphragms, and gaskets.





The following non-limitative examples illustrate the present invention specifically.
The degree of hydrogenation in each of the following examples was determined by an iodine value method.
REFERENTIAL EXAMPLE 1
Production of a partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber (1):
A 10-liter autoclave was charged with 1 kg of an acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubber (to be abbreviated NBR) having a bound acrylonitrile content of 45% and a Mooney viscosity (ML.sub.1+4, 100.degree. C.) of 50 and 4 kg of acetone to dissolve the rubber. Then, 20 g of a catalyst containing 3 to 5% by weight of Pd supported on activated carbon (average particle diameter 3.mu.) was added. The inside of the autoclave was purged with nitrogen, and the copolymer was subjected to hydrogenation at a reaction temperature of 50.degree. C. and a hydrogen pressure of 50 kg/cm.sup.2 for a reaction period of 1 to 4 hours. In this manner, three samples of partially hydrogenated NBR having a degree of hydrogenation of 45%, 70% and 90% were prepared.
REFERENTIAL EXAMPLE 2
Production of a liquid copolymer (2):
In accordance with the polymerization recipe shown in Table 1, the monomers were reacted at 35.degree. C. in a 10-liter autoclave until the conversion of the monomers reached at least 85%. After the reaction, a phenolic antioxidant was added to the resulting latex. The latex was coagulated with an aqueous sulfuric acid solution containing aluminum sulfate, washed with water, and dried in a vacuum dryer to give a liquid copolymer. The amount (% by weight) of bound acrylonitrile of the resulting copolymer was measured by the Kjeldahl's method, and its number average molecular weight, by ebulliometry. The properties of the resulting polymers are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 1______________________________________Polymerization recipe______________________________________Monomers (see Table 2) 100 (parts by weight)Water 250Sodium dibutylnaphthalenesulfonate 3.0Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate 1.0Sodium sulfate 0.2Sulfuric acid 0.1Potassium persulate 0.5t-Dodecylmercaptan variable (see Table 2)______________________________________
TABLE 2______________________________________ Properties of thePolymerization conditions liquid copolymerAmounts of t- Numbermonomers charged (parts) Dodecyl- Bound average Meth- mercap- acrylo- molec-Sam- Acrylo- Buta- acrylic tane nitrile ularple nitrile diene acid charged (wt. %) weight______________________________________A 42 54 4 10.0 40.6 2040B 45 55 0 12.0 43.3 1930C 45 52 3 11.0 43.5 1890D 42 54 4 20.0 40.8 870E 42 43 15 10.0 40.2 1910F 33 54 3 3.5 31.0 5800G 33 53* 4 9.0 31.2 1870H 33 52 5** 9.0 31.3 2070______________________________________ *Isoprene was used instead of butadiene. **Acrylic acid was used instead of methacrylic acid.
EXAMPLE 1
Each of the three samples of partially hydrogenated NBR having a bound acrylonitrile content of 45% and a degree of hydrogenation at the butadiene units of 45%, 70% and 90% respectively obtained in Referential Example 1 was mixed with the liquid copolymer A obtained in Referential Example 2 on a cold roll in the proportions (parts by weight) described in Table 4. Then, in accordance with the compounding recipe in Table 3, various compounding ingredients were added and mixed to form a rubber compound stock. It was heated under pressure at 160.degree. C. for 20 minutes to obtain a vulcanizate.
A vulcanizate was obtained in the same way as above except that NBR with a hydrogenation degree of 0% was used instead of the above partially hydrogenated NBR.
TABLE 3______________________________________Rubber (indicated in Table 2) 100 (parts by weight)Stearic acid 1Zinc oxide #3 5Sulfur 0.5SRF carbon black 80Plasticizer [Di-(butoxyethoxy- 20ethyl) adipate]Tetramethylthiuram disulfide 22-Mercaptobenzothiazole 0.5N--phenyl-N'--isopropyl 1p-phenylenediamineOctylated diphenylamine 1______________________________________
The properties of the vulcanizates were measured in accordance with JIS K-6301.
The solvent crack resistance was measured by the following method.
Two indicator lines were drawn at an interval of 20 mm at a central part of a rectangular test specimen having a width of 10 mm, a length of 100 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. Midway between the indicator lines, a cut with a width of 2 mm was provided parallel to the indicator lines and extending to the back of the specimen. This test specimen was secured to a jig capable of stretching the specimen to a desired length. Then, the specimen was stretched at a stretch ratio of 100%. The stretched specimen was dipped in a test solvent at 40.degree. C. and the time which elapsed until the test specimen broke was measured.
The results are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4______________________________________ Run No. Comparison InventionTest item 1 2 3 4 5 6______________________________________Degree of 0% 100 -- 80 -- -- --hydrogenation 45% -- -- -- 80 -- --of NBR 70% -- -- -- -- 80 -- 90% -- 100 -- -- -- 80Liquid copolymer A 0 0 20 20 20 20Properties of thevulcanizateTensile strength 147 168 126 123 117 125(kg/cm.sup.2)Elongation (%) 530 460 640 650 650 710300% Tensile stress 105 132 77 77 75 73(kg/cm.sup.2)Hardness (JIS) 62 70 57 59 62 65Resistance to heat aging(by the test tube method,125.degree. C. .times. 168 hrs.)Percent change of -8 -5 -9 +2 +6 -6tensile strength (%)Percent change of -48 -35 -47 -47 -44 -35elongation (%)Change of hardness +9 +4 +10 +9 +6 +4(point)Solvent crack resistance(seconds)isooctane/toluene (50/50 28 30 144 590 9,700 12,600by volume)isooctane/toluene/ 8 7 17 45 270 305methanol(40/40/20 by volume)isooctane/toluene/ 8 15 43 86 490 485ethanol(40/40/20 by volume)toluene 17 52 70 156 1,950 2,000acetone 5 11 20 26 204 220ethyl acetate 14 49 50 79 1,550 1,650trichloroethylene 11 24 39 48 460 470methanol 88 500 400 870 Did not break even after 70,000______________________________________
The results given in Table 4 show that the compositions of this invention comprising the partially hydrogenated NBR and the unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene liquid copolymer give oil-resistant vulcanized compositions which have markedly improved solvent crack resistance over those given by conventional compositions comprising NBR and unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene liquid copolymers.
EXAMPLE 2
Each of two samples of partially hydrogenated NBR having a hydrogenation degree in the butadiene units of 90% by weight and containing 41% by weight and 50% by weight, respectively, of bound acrylonitrile was mixed with the liquid copolymer (A) prepared in Referential Example 2 on a cold roll to form a mixture (80:20 by weight). The various compounding ingredients according to the compounding recipe shown in Table 3 were mixed with the above mixture on a cold roll to form a rubber compound stock. The compound stock was heated under pressure at 160.degree. C. for 20 minutes to form a vulcanizate.
Separately, a vulvanizate was obtained by operating in the same way as above except that NBR having a hydrogenation degree of 0% was used instead of the partially hydrogenated NBR.
These vulcanizates were tested in the same way as in Example 1. The results are shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5______________________________________ Run No. Comparison InventionTest item 7 8 9 10 11 12______________________________________NBR (BA 41; DH 0)* 100 80NBR (BA 41; DH 90) 100 80NBR (BA 50; DH 0) 80NBR (BA 50; DH 90) 80Liquid copolymer A 0 0 20 20 20 20Properties of thevulcanizateTensile strength 145 157 122 128 123 129Elongation (%) 550 460 650 590 690 660300% tensile stress 100 125 76 90 73 89(kg/cm.sup.2)Hardness (JIS) 62 70 56 57 64 65Solvent crackresistance(seconds)isooctane/toluene 21 28 90 93 13,100 13,600(50/50 by volumeisooctane/toluene/ 10 7 18 17 316 330methanol(40/40/20 by volume)isooctane/toluene/ 9 8 14 34 370 484ethanol(40/40/20 by volumetoluene 15 30 63 90 2,050 2,200acetone 4 10 20 23 225 237ethyl acetate 12 37 48 50 1,600 1,670trichloroethylene 11 23 35 40 470 500methanol 87 460 460 490 Did not break even after 70,000.______________________________________ *BA stands for bound acrylonitrile, and DH stands for the degree of hydrogenation.
EXAMPLE 3
The partially hydrogenated NBR prepared in Referential Example 1 which contained 45% by weight of bound acrylonitrile and had a hydrogenation degree at the butadiene units of 90% was mixed with each of the liquid copolymers (B-H) prepared in Referential Example 2 on a cold roll in the proportions (parts by weight) shown in Table 6. The mixture was blended with the various compounding ingredients according to the compounding recipe shown in Table 3. Each of the resulting rubber compounds was heated under pressure at 160.degree. C. for 20 minutes to form a vulcanizate.
Separately, a vulcanizate was obtained by operating in the same way as above except that NBR having a hydrogenation degree of 0% was used instead of the above partially hydrogenated NBR.
The solvent crack resistances of these vulcanizates were tested in the same way as in Example 1.
The results are shown in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________ Run No. Comparison InventionTest item 13 14 15 16 17______________________________________NBR (degree of 80 80hydrogenation 0%)NBR (degree of 80 80 90hydrogenation 90%)Liquid copolymer (B) (C) (D) (B) (C) 20 20 20 20 10Properties of the vulcanizateTensile strength (kg/cm.sup.2) 128 130 127 135 160Elongation (%) 580 630 670 690 700300% tensile stress 76 77 72 74 85(kg/cm.sup.2)Hardness (JIS) 59 58 62 63 66Heat aging test (test tubemethod, 125.degree. C. .times. 168 hrs)Percent change of -9 -10 -5 -1 +5tensile strength (%)Percent change of -49 -48 -39 -35 -26elongation (%)Change of hardness (point) +9 +10 +6 +5 +5Solvent crack resistance(seconds)isooctane/toluene 51 125 4,530 5,380 10,800(50/50 by volume)isooctane/toluene/methanol 11 16 238 167 264(40/40/20 by volume)isooctane/toluene/ethanol 21 39 442 288 450(40/40/20 by volume)toluene 18 65 940 1,100 1,850acetone 6 18 135 158 203ethyl acetate 20 46 1,140 1,320 1,540trichloroprene 14 35 386 423 461methanol 196 365 Did not break even after 70,000______________________________________ Run No. InventionTest item 18 19 20 21 22______________________________________NBR (degree ofhydrogenation 0%)NBR (degree of 70 60 70 70 70hydrogenation 90%)Liquid copolymer (C) (E) (F) (G) (H) 30 40 30 30 30Properties of thevulcanizateTensile strength 122 117 123 122 129(kg/cm.sup.2)Elongation (%) 700 770 680 650 710300% tensile stress 70 68 72 74 72(kg/cm.sup.2)Hardness (JIS) 61 56 62 60 59Heat aging test (test tubemethod,125.degree. C. .times. 168 hrs)Percent change of -6 -6 +1 -3 -4tensile strength (%)Percent change of -39 -41 -37 -38 -35elongation (%)Change of hardness +6 +7 +5 +6 +7(point)Solvent crack resistance(seconds)isooctane/toluene (50/50 12,700 12,700 10,700 9,600 12,700by volume)isooctane/toluene/ 296 287 295 260 286methanol(40/40/20 by volume)isooctane/toluene/ 491 485 470 435 475ethanol(40/40/20 by volume)toluene 2,000 2,050 1,950 1,850 2,100acetone 230 236 212 206 220ethyl acetate 1,650 1,700 1,650 1,620 1,660trichloroprene 478 482 472 459 493methanol Did not break even after 70,000______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. An oil-resistant rubber composition comprising 98 to 50 parts by weight of (1) a partially hydrogenated unsaturated nitrile/conjugated diene copolymer rubber in which at least 50% of units derived from the conjugated diene are hydrogenated, and 2 to 50 parts by weight of (2) a liquid copolymer having a number average molecular weight of 500 to 10,000 obtained by copolymerizing 10 to 80% by weight of a conjugated diene, 10 to 70% by weight of an unsaturated nitrile and 0 to 20% by weight of a vinyl monomer copolymerizable with these monomers, the total amount of the components (1) and (2) being 100 parts by weight.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the amount of bound nitrile in the copolymer rubber (1) is 10 to 60% by weight.
  • 3. The composition of claim 1 or 2 wherein the degree of hydrogenation of the copolymer rubber (1) is at least 70%.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1 wherein the liquid copolymer (2) has a number average molecular weight of 1,000 to 5,000.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
56-125681 Aug 1981 JPX
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
4136077 Williams et al. Jan 1979
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
50-94063 Jul 1975 JPX