Post-production preparation of an unprotected installation image for downloading as a protected software product

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8671060
  • Patent Number
    8,671,060
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 7, 2011
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 11, 2014
    11 years ago
Abstract
An installation image for installing an unprotected software product is used to install a protected version of the same product. A protected version of the executable file is embedded in a new installation image with the original installation image, in which the unprotected version of the executable file is damaged so as to be unusable and unreadable. The new installation image causes the original installation image to operate, installing the damaged installation file and other data files. The new installation image then replaces the damaged installation file with the protected installation file.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for protecting software from unauthorized copying and reverse-engineering.


2. Description of Related Art


Many different methods of installing software and protecting installed software exist in the art. As used herein, software protection includes adding copy control and anti reverse engineering functionality to an existing application, either before or after it is compiled. Such software protection operates to prevent unauthorized copying or reverse engineering of the software that is being protected. As such, software protection does not provide core functionality to the end user or drive distribution of software products, and may require programming expertise different from what is needed for the core software to develop. Therefore, protection may often be added to a software product after the product's core functionality has been designed, implemented, and tested. It is often desired to add software protection after a software product has completed testing and has been implemented as an application installation image configured for installation on client computers. The original installation image, which does not include the desired software protection features, must therefore be altered to include them.


As used herein, an “installation image” refers to all executable and non-executable data making up a software product application and all of its supporting data or applications, configured for encoding on a computer-readable medium or for transmission to a client for storage on or in a computer-readable medium. As used herein, “executable data,” “executable code,” “software executable,” or generally, “executable” means that the executable data, code or software is capable of being executed by a computer processor after being installed in the computer system. Prior to being installed, the data, code or software may, or may not, be in executable form. Executable software that becomes executable after being installed may nonetheless not be executable until installation on is completed. For example, the software executable may need to be first decrypted, assembled or decoded during an installation process. The installation image makes up the encoded data package that computer users obtain, for example, when they purchase a software product encoded on an optical disc, or download a software application. In each case the installation image includes all of the encoded information required to install the software product on a client computer.


To provide software protection for an existing software product having a completed installation image, developers of software protection often rebuild the installation image of an application to include protected versions of the main software components that make up the software product to be protected. This process requires a complete rebuild of the target product installation image, and the additional testing, quality assurance and time that this entails. Thus, software protection costs may be exacerbated by the practice of adding software protection after the application has been compiled, tested and placed into production. In addition, in such cases the original software developers, testers and quality assurance personnel may have become unavailable, causing delay in adding the software protection capabilities to the target product. For example, addition or software protection may be delayed until the release of the next version of the product, resulting in considerable exposure of the unprotected version of the software to the risk of copyright piracy or unauthorized reverse engineering.


It is desirable, therefore, to provide a method or system for adding software protection to an existing application installation image, that overcomes the limitations of the prior art as exemplified above.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present technology enables addition of a protected edition of target software after the tested installation image of the unprotected software has been installed on a computer client, without requiring rebuilding of the installation image for the protected product.


An installation image for a software product comprises executable files and non-executable data used by the one or more executable files during operation. One of the executable files operates as an installer application for installing the remainder of the executable files and data contained in the installation image. In the alternative, or in addition, one or more applications that are not included in the installation image may participate in some part of the installation process. For example, the computer system may include a generic installer application that operates to install some or all files and data included in the installation image. Installation may include decompressing compressed data or executable files, copying decompressed data or executable files to a computer memory for storage (such as to a hard drive, for example), writing information to specific system locations, such as uninstall files or shortcuts, updating system registry files, and other operations required to install the application within the client computer system as known in the art. It may be desired to provide software protection to one or more of the executable files included within the installation image. These executable files are sometimes referred to herein as “target files” or in the singular as a “target file.”


Software protection techniques as known in the art may be applied to the target files to produce a corresponding number of protected executable files. The protected executable files should operate in the same way as the target files with respect to use of input data, user interface, and interacting with other executable files within the installation image. However, the protected executable files may include ancillary features that prevent unauthorized copying or reverse engineering, without interfering with functionality of the target files. These ancillary features are not present in the original target files.


To provide a protected installation image, the present technology embeds or adds an existing installation image, including the target files, inside a master installation image that also includes the protected executable files. The master installation image contains master executable code for controlling and managing the installation process as well as a protected version of at least one target software executable. These two components work with the components of the original installation image to facilitate the installation of a protected version of the target software product.


Before the addition of the original installation image to the master installation image, one or more unprotected target software executables (normally all of the target software executables for which a protected executable file has been developed) are damaged so as to become inoperable. For example, some non-zero number of bits in the files may be flipped, set to zero, or set to one, such that the binary code will not operate and cannot be reverse engineered. This may be done to ensure that an unprotected version of the target software executable (or target software executables) is never installed in the event that the installation process of the master installation image is intentionally or unintentionally interrupted. Conversely, failing to damage the target files in the master installation image may create a risk of unauthorized access to a fully working unprotected version of the product, such as may occur if the master installation process is interrupted.


The master installation image may be configured with an installation executable that operates as follows. As used herein, “installation executable” refers to an executable application, software, or code configured to perform an installation process for other software and/or data. During installation of the master installation image for the protected version of the software product, the master installation image may invoke the embedded original installation executable, which, in turn, installs a complete copy of the damaged target software executable or executables. In the alternative, or in addition, the master installation executable may invoke an installation executable not included in the installation image, for example an installation utility application include in the computer's operating system, to install the complete copy of the damaged target software executable. Therefore, a damaged version of the original target software executable is first installed. After the original installation executable has completed execution, the master installation executable code replaces the damaged version of the original target software executable with the protected version of the target software executable, thereby completing the installation of a protected version of the software product, installed on the client computer and ready for use by the end user of the software.


A more complete understanding of the system and method for installing a protected software product will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by a consideration of the following detailed description. Reference will be made to the appended sheets of drawings which will first be described briefly.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows an exemplary computer system in which various aspects of the present technology may be implemented.



FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing exemplary elements of an installation image and related elements prior to being embedded inside a master installation image.



FIG. 2B is a block diagram showing exemplary elements of a master installation image with the embedded original installation image shown in FIG. 1A.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing an exemplary process flow implemented by operation of a master installation image on a client computer.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing an exemplary method for preparing a master installation image.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The novel technical solution disclosed herein overcomes the limitation of the prior art to regarding installation of newly protected software products. In the detailed description that follows, like element numerals are used to indicate like elements appearing in one or more of the figures.



FIG. 1 shows an exemplary client-server system 100 in which various aspects of the present technology may be implemented. A client computer 102 may include processor, memory, I/O, and other components as known in the art, and one or more devices for reading and/or writing to a computer-readable medium 104. For example, the client 102 may comprise an internal magnetic media hard drive, a DVD or CD-ROM optical drive, and a USB port for connecting to a flash memory drive. The client may also include processor memory 106 used for operating one or more software applications as described herein. In general, software applications are designed to receive some form of input from an external device or process, and process the input to provide some tangible output to an output device or to another process. For example, an application may be designed to receive keyboard input from a keyboard 108, process the input, and provide output to a display device 110, such as a computer monitor. Optionally, the client 102 may be adapted to connect to a wide area network 112 or other computer network for communicating with one or more other computers, for example a server 114. Server 114 may comprise a computer with components as known in the art, including, for example, a device for reading and/or writing to a computer-readable medium 118, processor memory 116 for operating one or more applications, at least one input device 120 and a display device 122. In application of the present technology, a server such as server 114 may be used to prepare a master installation image, which may be transmitted to one or more clients such as client 102 via a wide area network or other communications network, or physically transported to the client on a tangible computer-readable medium.


An exemplary configuration and operation of a master installation image is shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3. FIGS. 2A-2B show exemplary components of a protected software installation image. An original compiled installer component may be produced in the form of an installation image file 200, sometimes referred to herein as an original installation image, that contains at least one target software executable 206 and a combination of additional files and data 208. The target software executable 206 may be in the form of a binary-coded file or file portion configured to be loaded into a processor memory and thereby cause a client computer to carry out the processes for any desired application, as known in the art. Data, in contrast, is not executable and may be used as input for an application-driven computer process, and/or may represent output from the computer process. Some additional executable code 210 may placed in the installation image so as to load prior to loading the target software executable 206 to control and manage an installation process. In the alternative, or in addition, the installation image may be configured for installation by a pre-existing installer application on the target computer, which may obviate the need for an installation executable in the installation image itself. An installation process may include, for example, decompressing compressed data or executable files from the installation image 200, copying decompressed data or executable files to a computer memory for storage, writing information to specific system locations, such as uninstall files or shortcuts, updating system registry files, and other operations required to install the application within the client computer system, as known in the art. The installation executable 210 and target software executable may comprise two or more separate files, or in the alternative, may be integrated into a single file or portion of the installation image 200. After installation, the target software executable 206 may comprise one or more separate files within a file system of the target computer.


The target software executable 206 included in the original installation image may lack certain desired software protection features, and therefore it is desired to update it with a more thoroughly protected version. The original executable 206 may have some protection features; it need not be entirely devoid of such features.


To update the installation image 200 with improved protection features present in a protected version 215 of the target software executable, a new master installation executable 202 may be created. The protected software executable 215 should not include any changes that will affect operation of the executable in relation to the data 208 or installation configuration implemented by the installer 210, or in the alternative, by an external installation utility, if used. If such changes are necessary, the technical solution described herein may have unpredictable results, and is not recommended. The present solution addresses circumstances wherein the addition of desired protection features does not change operational features of the target software executable with respect to the original installation image configuration.


The new master installation image 202 may be assembled by embedding or integrating the original compiled installation image 200 that includes all the components of the compiled installer in their compiled state for installation in addition to a protected version of the target software executable 215, which may operate in the same way as the target software executable 206 with the addition of protection capabilities. The master installation file 202 may also comprise additional master installation executable code 214 configured to load and execute with the highest priority within the master installation image 202, to initiate, control and manage the installation process as explained in more detail below in connection with FIG. 3. Initially, the master installation executable code 214 may be configured to trigger the original compiled executable file 200 which, in turn, controls and manages its own installation process.


Before the original compiled installation image 200 is integrated with the master installation image 202, the target software executable 206 contained in the installation executable 200 may be damaged to transform it into a damaged executable file 213. This may be done to ensure that after installation, the target software executable in its damaged state 213 will not run and cannot be decompiled, in case the installation process carried out by the master installation image 202 is somehow interrupted. Damage may be done in a random, irreversible manner so that the original file cannot be restored by someone who possesses or guesses the algorithm used to damage the target software executable. For example, a damage algorithm may randomly select and flip the value of bits within the target software executable, thereby corrupting it, rendering it inoperable and impossible to decompile. As such, damaging the file, which irreversible corrupts the executable file, is distinct from encryption, which places the file in a temporarily inoperable state that may be reversed by anyone possessing a decryption key. Of course, instead of damaging the target software executable 206 to produce a damaged executable 213, the target software executable may be left undamaged or merely encrypted. These alternatives, however, may entail increased risk of unauthorized use. The master installation image may be used to delete or overwrite the damaged executable 213, so there should be no reason to preserve its operability.


After being assembled, the master installation image 202 may comprise one or more files made up of component parts, as follows. The installation image 202 may comprise a master installation executable file or file portion, which is configured to initiate and control the master installation process. The installation image 202 may further comprise the protected version 215 of the target software executable, the original installation executable 210, the damaged original (unprotected) target software executable 213, and the original data 208.



FIG. 3 shows exemplary steps of an installation method 300 such as may be implemented by a master installation image operating on a client computer. Method 300 may be initiated by running the master installation image, which may be configured to operate first when after the master installation image is copied to the client computer and selected for installation by a computer user, or automatically run. Upon initializing, the master installer application may execute the original installer executable at 304 or external installation application if applicable, and also initiate a wait process 310 that waits for the original installer application to complete execution. At 306, the original installer application may install all files from the original installation image, which may include a damaged version of the target application main executable, or in the alternative, an undamaged or encrypted version. When the original installer application completes execution at 308, the master installer monitoring process 310 may trigger a replacement process 312, that replaces the damaged version of the target software executable (or in the alternative, the undamaged or encrypted original target software executable) with the protected version of the original target software executable. For example, the replacement process may overwrite the damaged target software executable with the protected version of the target software executable having an identical file name in the client file system, or may delete the original target software executable from the file system and then write the protected version of the target software executable, having a filename identical to the deleted file, to the client file system. The target software executable may comprise more than one file, in which case each file may be replaced by a protected version of the file under the same file name. Subsequently the master installer application completes execution 314 and terminates. The result of method 300 should be that the protected application version is installed on the client system with all necessary data, registry entries, DLL files, and other system files necessary to facilitate proper operation of the application on the client, and the original target software executable no longer exists in the client computer system as an operable file. It may still exist on the client as part of the master installation image, if the master installation image is not deleted. However, if damaged as disclosed herein, it cannot be extracted for unauthorized use.



FIG. 4 shows exemplary steps 400 for preparing a master installation image, in accordance with the foregoing. The master installation image may be prepared, for example, using a server for distribution to multiple target clients. At 402, the server may receive a copy of the original installation image. This may be the original image as prepared for distribution by the original software developers. A protected version of the target software executable may be received by the server at 404. This should possess the attributes described above, and may be prepared as known in the art of software protection. Methods for coding software protection features are not the concern of the present disclosure, and are known in the art. At 406, a master installation executable for the master installation image may be prepared and received for use by the server. The master installation executable should be programmed to incorporate the essential features diagrammed in FIG. 3 and otherwise disclosed herein. At 408, the original target software executable included in the original installation image may be disabled, that is, damage as described above. For example, randomly selected bits in the executable may be flipped. An algorithm may be employed to randomly select and flip the bits in a pattern sufficiently complex and massive so as to make repair of the target software executable virtually impossible. For example, if the target software executable comprises 108 bits of data, the algorithm may flip 10 bits at each of, for example, 1000 randomly selected locations. At 410, the server may be used to assemble the master installation image as diagrammed in FIG. 2B. The finished master installation image may be output 412, for example, by transmitting to a target client or by encoding on a computer-readable medium. In general, the server may transmit multiple copies of the master installation image to a corresponding number of target clients via a network connection. In the alternative, or in addition, duplicate copies of the master installation image may be encoded on optical discs or in flash memory devices for physical distribution to target clients.


Having thus described exemplary embodiments for installing a protected software product using an unprotected installation image, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that certain advantages of the within system have been achieved. It should also be appreciated that various modifications, adaptations, and alternative embodiments thereof may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present technology. For example, methods and systems for installing a single target software executable have been illustrated, but it should be apparent that the novel concepts described above may be applied by one of ordinary skill to multiple executables within an installation image to thereby realize the benefits described herein. The following claims define the scope of what is claimed.

Claims
  • 1. A method for altering an unprotected software installation image to install a protected version of an unprotected executable file included in the installation image, instead of installing the unprotected executable file, the method involving assembling a master installation image at a server, the master installation image for download from a server to a target computer, wherein the master installation image is assembled by: receiving, by the server, a first executable file comprising the unprotected software installation image configured for installing the unprotected executable file in the target computer;receiving, a second executable file comprising the protected version of the unprotected executable file that is identical in function to the unprotected executable file except for incorporating additional code configured to protect the unprotected executable file from unauthorized use;receiving a third executable file configured with instructions for replacing the unprotected executable file with the protected version of the unprotected executable file in a computer-readable medium, in response to completion of installation of the unprotected executable file in the computer-readable medium; andintegrating, at the server, the unprotected installation image, the protected version of the unprotected executable file, and the third executable file to produce the master installation image configured for installing the protected version of the unprotected executable file instead of the unprotected executable file.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a fourth executable file configured for initiating operation of the unprotected installation image on the target computer.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising integrating the fourth executable file into the master installation image.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising disabling the unprotected executable file included in the master installation image to render the unprotected executable file inoperable.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising irreversibly altering information in the unprotected executable file to disable the unprotected executable file.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, further comprising randomly altering information in the unprotected executable file to disable the unprotected executable file.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting the master installation image to the target computer.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising writing the master installation image to a computer-readable medium.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the third executable file is further configured with instructions to deliberately and irreversibly corrupt the unprotected executable file so that it will not run and cannot be decompiled.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
08831302 Sep 2007 EP regional
PCT/US2008/077245 Sep 2007 WO international
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional application for U.S. non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/235,243, filed Sep. 22, 2008, which claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/973,781, filed Sep. 20, 2007, which application is specifically incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.

US Referenced Citations (104)
Number Name Date Kind
4351982 Miller et al. Sep 1982 A
4658093 Hellman Apr 1987 A
4704610 Smith et al. Nov 1987 A
4796220 Wolfe Jan 1989 A
5155847 Kirouac et al. Oct 1992 A
5210795 Lipner et al. May 1993 A
5260999 Wyman Nov 1993 A
5291598 Grundy Mar 1994 A
5414269 Takahashi May 1995 A
5418854 Kaufman et al. May 1995 A
5440635 Bellovin et al. Aug 1995 A
5490216 Richardson, III Feb 1996 A
5666415 Kaufman Sep 1997 A
5745879 Wyman Apr 1998 A
5754763 Bereiter May 1998 A
5790664 Coley et al. Aug 1998 A
5893910 Martineau et al. Apr 1999 A
5925127 Ahmad Jul 1999 A
5974150 Kaish et al. Oct 1999 A
6006328 Drake Dec 1999 A
6009401 Horstmann Dec 1999 A
6009525 Horstmann Dec 1999 A
6044471 Colvin Mar 2000 A
6158005 Bharathan et al. Dec 2000 A
6169976 Colosso Jan 2001 B1
6230199 Revashetti et al. May 2001 B1
6233567 Cohen May 2001 B1
6243468 Pearce et al. Jun 2001 B1
6243469 Kataoka et al. Jun 2001 B1
6294793 Brunfeld et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330670 England et al. Dec 2001 B1
6449645 Nash Sep 2002 B1
6484182 Dunphy et al. Nov 2002 B1
6536005 Augarten Mar 2003 B1
6785825 Colvin Aug 2004 B2
6804257 Benayoun et al. Oct 2004 B1
6859793 Lambiase Feb 2005 B1
6920567 Doherty et al. Jul 2005 B1
6976009 Tadayon et al. Dec 2005 B2
7032110 Su et al. Apr 2006 B1
7051211 Matyas, Jr. et al. May 2006 B1
7069440 Aull Jun 2006 B2
7069595 Cognigni et al. Jun 2006 B2
7085741 Lao et al. Aug 2006 B2
7188241 Cronce et al. Mar 2007 B2
7203966 Abburi et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206765 Gilliam et al. Apr 2007 B2
7263606 Elteto Aug 2007 B2
7272728 Pierson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7287166 Chang et al. Oct 2007 B1
7319987 Hoffman et al. Jan 2008 B1
7327280 Bachelder et al. Feb 2008 B2
7328453 Merkle et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337147 Chen et al. Feb 2008 B2
7343297 Bergler et al. Mar 2008 B2
7430670 Horning et al. Sep 2008 B1
7457951 Proudler et al. Nov 2008 B1
7463945 Kiesel et al. Dec 2008 B2
7653899 Lindahl et al. Jan 2010 B1
20010034712 Colvin Oct 2001 A1
20010034846 Beery Oct 2001 A1
20010044782 Hughes et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020019814 Ganesan Feb 2002 A1
20020082997 Kobata et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020161718 Coley et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030065918 Wiley Apr 2003 A1
20030172035 Cronce et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030191938 Woods et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040024860 Sato et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040030912 Merkle et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040059929 Rodgers et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040059938 Hughes et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040066417 Anabuki et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083469 Chen et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040143746 Ligeti et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040187018 Owen et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040215661 Zhang et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050108173 Stefik et al. May 2005 A1
20050138155 Lewis Jun 2005 A1
20050172280 Ziegler et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060026442 Ittogi Feb 2006 A1
20060064756 Ebert Mar 2006 A1
20060072444 Engel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095454 Shankar et al. May 2006 A1
20060161914 Morrison et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060265337 Wesinger, Jr. Nov 2006 A1
20060265758 Khandelwal et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282511 Takano et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070168288 Bozeman Jul 2007 A1
20070198422 Prahlad et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203846 Kavuri et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070219917 Liu et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070220500 Saunier Sep 2007 A1
20070255947 Choudhury et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282615 Hamilton et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080065552 Elezar et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080086423 Waites Apr 2008 A1
20080147556 Smith et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080168564 Lerouge et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080228578 Mashinsky Sep 2008 A1
20080320607 Richardson Dec 2008 A1
20090077390 Cobelo et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090083730 Richardson Mar 2009 A1
20090204661 Endo et al. Aug 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
678985 Jun 1997 AU
1 637 958 Mar 2006 EP
1 637 961 Mar 2006 EP
1 670 188 Jun 2006 EP
1978454 Apr 2011 EP
WO 9220022 Nov 1992 WO
WO 9301550 Jan 1993 WO
WO 9535533 Dec 1995 WO
WO 9842098 Sep 1998 WO
WO 0067095 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0155876 Aug 2001 WO
WO 2005104686 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2007060516 May 2007 WO
WO 2008013504 Jan 2008 WO
WO 2008034900 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2008157639 Dec 2008 WO
WO 2010104928 Sep 2010 WO
WO 2013048418 Apr 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Technical Details on Microsoft Product Activation Fort Windows XP. Aug. 13, 2001.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued on Mar. 24, 2010 for PCT Application No. PCT/US08/077245.
“Technical Details on Microsoft Product Activation for Windows XP,” Internet Citation, XP002398930, Aug. 13, 2001.
Angha et al.; “Securing Transportation Network Infrastructure with Patented Technology of Device Locking—Developed by Uniloc USA”, http://www.dkassociates.com/admin/paperfile/ITS%20World%20Paper%20Submission—Uniloc%20—2—.pdf; Oct. 24, 2006.
Econolite; Econolite and Uniloc Partner to Bring Unmatched Infrastructure Security to Advanced Traffic Control Networks with Launch to StrongPoint; http://www.econolite.com/docs/press/20080304—Econolite—StronPoint.pdf; Mar. 4, 2008.
Wikipedia: “Software Extension,” May 28, 2009, Internet Article retrieved on Oct. 11, 2010. XP002604710.
H. Williams, et al., “Web Database Applications with PHP & MySQL”, Chapter 1, “Database Applications and the Web”, ISBN 0-596-00041-3, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., Mar. 2002, avail. at: http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/webprog/webdb/ch01—01.htm. XP002603488.
Williams, R., “A Painless Guide to CRC Error Detection Algorithms,” Aug. 13, 1993, 33 pages, www.ross.net/crc/download/crc—v3.txt.
Jeges et al., “Watermarking Software to Signal Copy Protection,” Computer Network Security: Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2007, vol. 1, Part 7, Part 12, pp. 408-413.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120030668 A1 Feb 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60973781 Sep 2007 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12235243 Sep 2008 US
Child 13269415 US