This invention relates to a protective panel and a landing gear module comprising same. It is intended to reduce the weight of a protective panel and to improve the resistance to impacts, in particular to tire impacts on a boat panel. It thus applies, in particular, to the aeronautical field.
For airplanes of known type, the boat panel, positioned at the back of a landing gear and protecting the fuselage from debris and pebbles stirred up by the rolling of the tires during takeoff or landing, is made of aluminum and therefore has a coefficient of elongation to breaking, that is to say the rate of maximum elongation before breaking, of 9%. Because of the presence of frames with return at the aluminum skin, which are very rigid, when there is an impact between two frames, only the skin over a distance between the frames involved is acted upon and therefore the elongation over the panel is maximized, since the frames do not provide any latitude in radial deformation.
This metal panel is heavy, however, and therefore does not meet present-day needs to make airplanes lighter.
This invention is intended to remedy these drawbacks. To this end, this invention applies to a protective panel for a vehicle, characterized in that its outer surface comprises at least one composite material and in that the said protective panel is mounted, by means of deformable parts, on a support linked to the structure of the vehicle, the rate of deformation of the said deformable parts being adapted to the coefficient of breaking elongation of the outer surface so that several said deformable parts become deformed before the outer surface breaks.
By virtue of these provisions, an advantage is gained from the lightness of the composite material. In the event of impact, the deformation of the deformable parts allows, in comparison with the rigid supports of the aluminum panels of the prior art, an extension of the deformation of the outside surface over a large expanse which, despite the low coefficient of elongation to breaking (typically less than 2%), improves the resistance to impacts. In this way, the low coefficient of elongation to breaking is compensated by the incorporation of deformable parts. The deformable parts thus make up “fusible” parts during impact.
According to specific characteristics, the said deformable parts take the form of clips.
According to specific characteristics, the said composite material is made of CFRP (acronym for “carbon fiber reinforced plastic” for plastic reinforced with carbon fibers).
According to specific characteristics, the said support is rigid.
According to specific characteristics, the deformable parts are attached to several stiffening parts of the support. These stiffening parts are called “stringers” or “frames.”
According to specific characteristics, the deformable parts are perpendicular to the outer surface of the panel and adapted for buckling under the effect of impacts.
In fact, the increase in height allows making the deformable parts clearly less resistant to compression loads perpendicular to the fuselage and therefore buckle under impact. That then makes it possible to act on the outer surface of the panel, or “skin” bending out of plane, for example over three intervals between the stiffening elements, instead of only one in the prior art.
According to a second aspect, this invention applies to a landing gear module characterized in that it comprises a landing gear and a protective panel that is the object of this invention, as briefly set forth above.
According to a third aspect, this invention applies to an aircraft, characterized in that it comprises at least one landing gear module such as briefly set forth above.
Since the specific advantages, purposes and characteristics of this module are similar to those of the panel that is the object of this invention, such as briefly set forth above, they are not repeated here.
Other specific advantages, purposes and characteristics of this invention will become apparent from the description that is going to follow, in an explanatory and no way limitative intent, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
A landing gear module 105 comprising a landing gear 110 and a protective panel 115, also called “boat panel,” are seen on
In accordance with this invention and as illustrated on
Deformable parts 125 are perpendicular to outer surface 140 of protective panel 115 and are adapted for buckling under the effect of impacts.
The deformable parts have a deformation rate (in length of deformation per unit of force applied) adapted to the coefficient of breaking elongation of the outer surface, so that several deformable parts become deformed before the outer surface breaks. In other words, the breaking force of the outer surface corresponds to a multiple of the force that suffices for the deformation of a deformable part, the multiple considered being all the higher as the coefficient of breaking elongation is lower. For example, when the coefficient of breaking elongation is divided by two, this multiple is doubled.
In this way deformable parts 125 allow an extension of the zone of the panel that is deformable in the event of impact, in comparison with the rigid structures of the metal boat panels of known type. In order that these deformable parts 125 may become deformed in the thickness of protective panel 115, the latter is thicker than the usual boat panels made of aluminum.
In this way, the low elongation to breaking of the composite material of the skin, less than 2% in the case of CFRP, is compensated by a significant thickening of protective panel 115 allowing the deformation of deformable parts 125.
It is seen that, for the same breaking-through of the skin:
Clips 125, attached to several stiffening parts (frames 145 or stringers) of panel 115, form fusible parts during impact. Clips 125 are poorly resistant to compression loads perpendicular to outer surface 140 and therefore buckle under impact. As set forth with reference to
On
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 55310 | Jul 2008 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/000966 | 7/31/2009 | WO | 00 | 1/28/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/012913 | 2/4/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1894582 | De Bell | Jan 1933 | A |
3670996 | Jenny | Jun 1972 | A |
4252355 | Goupy et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4408736 | Kirschbaum et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4460205 | Glance | Jul 1984 | A |
4479621 | Bergholz | Oct 1984 | A |
5058827 | Dansereau et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085382 | Finkenbeiner | Feb 1992 | A |
5126190 | Sakatani et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5542626 | Beuck et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5843558 | Yoshizaki et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6199937 | Zetouna et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6702911 | Toi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719865 | Kasahara et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6845943 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7080805 | Prichard et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7946531 | Jackson | May 2011 | B2 |
7997529 | Koch et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7997534 | Eberth | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20010010345 | Clifford | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20050281987 | Starke | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070029443 | Manz | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080210824 | Eberth | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257671 | Jacob et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090314891 | Haack | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 354 403 | Feb 1990 | EP |
1 464 915 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 607 272 | Dec 2005 | EP |
2 871 725 | Dec 2005 | FR |
2 022 212 | Dec 1979 | GB |
2 346 117 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2005 100152 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2008 015360 | Feb 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report Issued Nov. 19, 2009 in PCT/FR09/000966 filed Jul. 31, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110174923 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |