1. Need for Pinch-Point Protection
Operators of resistance (spot) welding machines are often exposed to potentially serious injury due to the pinch point area between the welding electrodes. A typical resistance welder operates with electrode forces of 113.4 kg (250 lbs) to 2.268 metric tons (5000 lbs.) and higher. Because the force is concentrated on a very small contact surface of the electrode, the force density is extremely high and can easily cause permanent finger injury or total amputation.
For example, on a welder with 272.4 kg (600 lbs.) of electrode force and a 25.4 mm (¼″) contact surface, the force density at the pinch point is 5.547 metric tons/25.4 mm2 (12,229 lb/in). Because a common application of a resistance welding machine requires the operator to load parts between the electrodes as well as keep their hands on these parts during the welding sequence, the possibility for serious injury is present on a daily basis. This invention eliminates serious pinch-point injury by reducing the force between electrodes to a very low level when the operator's finger or other body part is between the electrodes.
2. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a monitoring system having voltage pickup wires or contacts connected to the resistance-welding machine's transformer secondary pads or primary input lines. This connection creates a signal which is conditioned and then compared to a voltage reference signal. The output of this sensor system connects to a permissive input on the welding control and through fail-safe logic therein prevents energizing of solenoid valves or other systems that would apply high force between the welder's electrodes until metal has been detected between the these electrodes. Methods are also claimed that will reduce welder ram dead weight to an acceptable level prior to application of high electrode force.
3. Prior Art
A typical prior art arrangement will be described with reference to
A second form of the prior art arrangement is used on rocker arm type welders and shown in
A third form of the prior art arrangement, as shown in
This prior art allows automatic setting of the correct spacing between electrodes 6. However, in this third prior art arrangement, proper setting of the cam is mechanical and subject to mechanical adjustment errors. Additionally, as with the first two forms, if the electrodes 6 spacing is changed during normal production or subsequent electrode replacement or adjustment, and the operator does not remember to reset the finger the safety of the system is compromised.
A fourth form of the prior art arrangement, as shown in
However, in this fourth prior art arrangement if the welder operator or setup person does not adjust the sensing arm 11 properly, high force can be applied between the welding electrodes 6 even though the operator's finger or other body part is between the electrodes. Further, just bending this sensing arm 11 out of the proper sensing zone renders this system totally useless.
The present invention is intended to solve the problems of the prior art pinch point protection for resistance-welding machines. This sensing system measures continuity between the welding electrodes after the welding machine has been initiated and prevents application of high electrode force between the electrodes if the continuity measured is below a reference level. The result is a fully passive system that prevents serious high electrode force that would cause serious pinch-point injury to the operator of the welder.
It is the object of the invention to provide a pinch point sensing device of the character described.
Another object of the present invention to provide a passive sensing system that will only allow high electrode force to be applied between welding electrodes if continuity between the electrodes has been detected, whereby the electrodes will clamp only on any low-resistance material, but will not clamp on a high-resistance material such as an operator's finger or other body part.
Another object is to provide internal sensing of continuity between the welding electrodes whereby no operator adjustments can be made in either the continuity sensing system or the internal control logic, and, additionally, since the continuity sensing is independent of electrode position, the sensing system will protect the pinch point area even if spacing between the electrodes is changed.
Another object is to provide switching from low to high electrode force which permits limiting electrode force prior to continuity detection and still provides pinch point protection.
Another object is to provide a method to reduce force between electrodes when the welder ram is closed under the force of gravity.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
A resistance-welding machine according to a preferred embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to
This voltage is transmitted inductively to the welding transformer's secondary 17 and to the welding electrodes 18. A pair of wires 19 or contacts are connected across the welding transformer's secondary 17, ideally at the points closest to the transformer's output keep the sensor wires out of the mechanical area of the welder, and to the input of the continuity sensor 20.
During a welding sequence, the welding controller 25 energizes low-pressure solenoid valve, 27. The welding electrodes 18 are now brought together under low force by the welding controller. If these welding electrodes 18 contact low-resistance metal to be welded, impedance of the welder secondary 17 is lowered.
Since the available current from the R/C element 14 is very low, the lowered impedance of the secondary 17 greatly reduces voltage from this R/C element on the transformer primary 16 to inductively reduce voltage on the transformer secondary 17. This lowered voltage at the secondary 17 is transmitted through wires 19 to the input of the continuity sensor, 20. The first stage of the continuity sensor 20 conditions this input voltage. The conditioned voltage is fed into a comparator 22. If this conditioned input voltage level goes below the comparator's reference voltage relay 23 is energized. Normally open contacts 24 on this relay are closed to signal the welding controller 25 that continuity has been detected between the electrodes 18.
Adjustment of the internal reference voltage will match electrical response of the welder to closed and open electrode conditions for different types of welders. At this time, logic in the welding controller 25 energizes a solenoid valve 26 to put full welding force between welding electrodes 18. However, if this conditioned reference voltage fails to go below the reference voltage of the comparator 22 within a time limit, the controller 25 releases low-pressure solenoid valve 27, and the electrodes 18 open without ever reaching full force. At the same time, a diagnostic can be displayed on the welding controller 25.
Alternately, as shown in
During a welding sequence, the welding controller 25, energizes low-pressure solenoid valve 27. If welding electrodes 18 contact low-resistance metal 21 being welded, impedence of the welding transformer's secondary is greatly lowered. Since the available current from the R/C element 14 is very low, the lowered impedance of the transformer's secondary reduces voltage from this R/C element on the transformer primary 16. This lowered and isolated voltage is transmitted through wires 29 through a step-down transformer 28 and to input of the continuity sensor 20. The first stage of the continuity sensor 20, conditions this input voltage. The conditioned voltage is fed into a comparator 22. If this conditioned input voltage level goes below the reference voltage of the comparator 22, relay 23 is energized. Normally open contacts 24 on this relay 23 are closed to signal the welding controller 25 that continuity has been detected between the electrodes 18.
Adjustment of the internal reference voltage will match electrical response of the welder to close and open electrode conditions for different types of welders. At this time, logic in the welding controller energizes a high pressure solenoid valve 26 to put full welding force between welding electrodes 18. However, if this conditioned reference voltage fails to go below the reference voltage of the comparator 22 within a time limit, the controller 25 releases low-pressure solenoid valve 27, and the electrodes 18 open without ever reaching full force. At the same time, a diagnostic can be displayed on the welding controller 25.
Sequences of Operation (
Sequence 1: Continuity sensor input is not closed at start: The control turns on the low-pressure solenoid valve 27 to bring the electrodes closed under low force. The control continues to monitor the continuity sensor input.
Sequence 1a: If the continuity sensor input is not closed within the selected maximum set detect time, the low-force solenoid valve 27 is turned off to open the electrodes, a display fault is shown on the control, and the system locks out until the initiation switch has been opened.
Sequence 1b: If the continuity sensor input closes before the selected detect time has elapsed, the This arrangement is typically used for welding of parts that are not flat at the beginning of the welding sequence, or where a redundant sensor is desired.
The limit switch, like that shown in
The logic chart shown in
Sequences of Operation (
Sequence 1: Neither continuity sensor nor limit switch contact closure is detected at start: The control turns on the low-pressure solenoid valve to bring the electrodes closed under low force. The control continues to monitor both input signals.
Sequence 1a: If contact closure from both the continuity sensor and the limit switch are not detected within the predetermined selected detect time, the low-force solenoid valve is turned off to open the electrodes, a display fault is shown on the control, and the system locks out until the initiation switch has been opened.
Sequence 1b: If contact closure from both the continuity detector and the limit switch is detected before the detect time has elapsed, the high-force solenoid valve is energized to put full force on the electrodes. The control then goes through the weld sequence and finally turns off both solenoid valves to release the electrodes.
Sequence 2: Contact closure from either one or both inputs is detected at the start. Because this indicates a continuity circuit failure or faulty setting of the reference voltage, a short in the detector wires, or an improperly set or permanently closed limit switch, the control does not energize even the low-force solenoid valve and locks out waiting for the initiation switch to be opened before allowing the next attempted cycle.
Mechanical Methods for Attaining Low Approach Force.
Methods of mechanical operation to provide both low and high force between the electrodes are required to utilize the logic of the present invention. Different mechanical arrangements of pneumatic and other components are required to operate different types of resistance welding machines. This section covers the most common welding systems. However the use of the present invention is not limited to this machinery group.
Welders with Significant Ram Weight:
Force between electrodes produced by gravity closure (weight of the ram) alone on this type of welder is high enough to cause significant pinch point injury.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention, a system is installed to partially counterbalance the gravity dead weight of the ram during the initial stages of each cycle and until continuity between the electrodes has been established.
A preferred arrangement for a pneumatically operated cylinder to operate a press welder is shown in
The sequence of events during a typical welding cycle is shown in
Lowering of air pressure on the underside of piston 46 causes the cylinder piston to drop under the force of gravity. As this happens, downward movement of the welder cylinder piston 46 pushes air out of lower port 44. Because this airflow is restricted by flow control valve 42 air in the lower portion of this cylinder is partially compressed to impose a backpressure on the underside of piston 46. This back pressure imposes an upward force on piston 46 to partially reduce the gravity-produced weight of the welder's ram. sequence, force in pounds between the welding electrodes 50 is represented by the formula:
F=RW−(ps 25.4 mm (in)×A)
At this time, the control energizes solenoid valve 39 while still keeping solenoid valve 41 energized. This puts higher-pressure air, as supplied from regulator 50, on the top of the welder cylinder at port 45, and exhausts air from the bottom of the welder cylinder 44 through shuttle 43, through pressure regulator 49, and out the exhaust of solenoid 39.
When the sequence has been completed, the air on the top of the welding cylinder piston 46 will be at the level of pressure regulator 50, and the air on the bottom of the welding cylinder piston will be zero. The welding electrodes will now be at full force for welding.
At this stage of the sequence, force in pounds between the welding electrodes 50 is represented by the formula:
F=ps 25.4 mm (in)×A
These welder types require a different pneumatic scheme for operation.
Rocker Arm:
The typical mechanical design of one type, a rocker arm welder, is shown in
Unless the beam is very long and made of very heavy material, force between electrodes on this type of rocker arm welder is normally zero or very low when air is exhausted from the welding cylinder. In most cases, the electrodes will not even close when air is removed from the cylinder.
Low Ram Weight Press Welders:
A second type, as shown in
The sequence of events during a typical welding cycle starts as shown in
F=ps 25.4 mm (in)×A
Force, in 0.4536 kg (pounds), between the electrodes at this stage of the sequence for a press welder is represented by the formula
F=ps 25.4 mm (in)×A
Force, in 0.4536 kg (pounds), between the electrodes at this stage of the sequence for a rocker arm welder, is represented by the formula
F=CB×(ps 25.4 mm (in)×A)
After the weld sequence has been completed, the welding control will de-energize both solenoid valves 55, and 59 to return the welder cylinder piston 57 to the retraced position of
If the input is not closed from the continuity sensor (or both continuity sensor and limit switch if so installed) to the welding control within the maximum customer-set sensor time, solenoid valve 59 will not be energized, and solenoid valve 55 will be de-energized to return the welder cylinder piston 57 to the retraced position of
Welders without Significant Weight but that Close Under Gravity:
This type of welder can use a much more simple arrangement to utilize the features of this invention. The mechanical arrangement for a press welder, as shown in
A preferred arrangement for a pneumatically operated cylinder is shown in
F=psi×A
This type of welder utilizes a motor-driven mechanism to close the electrodes. The system embodying this invention communicates with the servo control circuitry to provide low torque prior to electrode continuity detection. If continuity is not detected prior to the maximum detection time has expired, the low-force signal to the servo control circuitry will be turned off to force the servo system to return the electrode to the fully open position.
While embodiments of the invention have been shown in considerable detail, it is not intended that the inventions should be limited to the exact construction described and many changes and modifications of the structure and methods can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
This application is a National Stage application of International Application No. PCT/US2006/049131, filed Dec. 21, 2006, titled “Resistance Welding Machine Pinch Point Safety Sensor,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/755,434, filed Dec. 30, 2005.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/049131 | 12/21/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/24/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/079041 | 7/12/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2435577 | Dawson | Feb 1948 | A |
2617913 | Oestreicher | Nov 1952 | A |
2874960 | Vernon Durbin et al. | Feb 1959 | A |
3041437 | Carissimi | Jun 1962 | A |
3191441 | Erickson | Jun 1965 | A |
3404251 | Hubbard | Oct 1968 | A |
3404252 | Michael | Oct 1968 | A |
3414808 | Thomas | Dec 1968 | A |
3449544 | Needham | Jun 1969 | A |
3627975 | Goto | Dec 1971 | A |
3670138 | Schmiege et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3686891 | Wills | Aug 1972 | A |
3708648 | Croucher et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3731149 | Sherman et al. | May 1973 | A |
3737751 | Lima | Jun 1973 | A |
3770989 | Shaw | Nov 1973 | A |
3786329 | Whited | Jan 1974 | A |
3813021 | Kramer | May 1974 | A |
3838244 | Petrides et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3854076 | Lambert | Dec 1974 | A |
3864612 | Whited | Feb 1975 | A |
3876920 | Meissen et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3965329 | Petrides et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3995208 | Parr | Nov 1976 | A |
4039928 | Noftsker et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4041272 | Burton et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4079226 | Boyd et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4092509 | Mitchell | May 1978 | A |
4095077 | Schneider et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4151396 | Veal | Apr 1979 | A |
4275341 | Huber et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4289948 | Jurek et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4301351 | Mathews | Nov 1981 | A |
4302653 | Denning et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4329561 | Schafer et al. | May 1982 | A |
4386299 | Pham | May 1983 | A |
4388569 | Shipaev et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396877 | Egri et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4423363 | Clark et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4442337 | Nakata et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4447698 | Van Sikle et al. | May 1984 | A |
4447699 | Gold et al. | May 1984 | A |
4447700 | Cohen | May 1984 | A |
4450340 | Corrigall et al. | May 1984 | A |
4456809 | Jones et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4459459 | Overman | Jul 1984 | A |
4503312 | Nakata et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4517439 | Colley | May 1985 | A |
4529919 | Melocik et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4555652 | Brulard | Nov 1985 | A |
4568864 | Gisske | Feb 1986 | A |
4570050 | Veal et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4596917 | Nied et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4631383 | Haggett | Dec 1986 | A |
4644138 | Walsh | Feb 1987 | A |
4672277 | Makinen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4680441 | McKendrick | Jul 1987 | A |
4694135 | Nagel et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4733042 | Nishiwaki et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4792734 | Watanabe | Dec 1988 | A |
4816726 | Novis et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4922161 | Gilliland et al. | May 1990 | A |
4990837 | Ishitobi | Feb 1991 | A |
5187348 | Cuba et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5245546 | Iceland | Sep 1993 | A |
5252802 | Raycher | Oct 1993 | A |
5254828 | Stiebel | Oct 1993 | A |
5361022 | Brown | Nov 1994 | A |
5406044 | Killian et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5436427 | Bourque | Jul 1995 | A |
5449992 | Geiger et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5484976 | Sbalchiero et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484986 | Fantazian et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498944 | Nakata | Mar 1996 | A |
5517093 | Augustyniak et al. | May 1996 | A |
5558785 | Killian et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5645738 | Cecil | Jul 1997 | A |
5652488 | Rennau | Jul 1997 | A |
5760361 | Dew et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818184 | Kim | Oct 1998 | A |
5821491 | Dew et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5898285 | Nagasawa et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936495 | LeCourt | Aug 1999 | A |
5945011 | Takano et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5969303 | Piserchia et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988486 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018729 | Zacharia et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028290 | Yasuhara et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6131429 | Ward | Oct 2000 | A |
6172884 | Lanni | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6236177 | Zick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
RE37607 | Cecil | Mar 2002 | E |
6359249 | Brown et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404155 | Funayama et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6483268 | Cummins | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515251 | Wind | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6650515 | Schmalz | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7012392 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034476 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7308352 | Wang et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20030048006 | Shelter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040074884 | Butler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050024907 | Lanni | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050194923 | Huang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080302766 | Hirsch | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Hirsch, Roger, “Keeping Spot Welder Operators Safe,” [retrieved on Aug. 12, 2016], retrieved from the internet <URL: http://www.unitrol-electronics.com (Internet Archive, Way Back machine)> Nov. 4, 2005, entire document (5 pages). |
Written Opinion and International Search Report for corresponding Application No. PCT/US06/49131 mailed Mar. 11, 2008. |
Canadian Office Action for corresponding Application No. 2,640,891 mailed Nov. 6, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080302766 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60755434 | Dec 2005 | US |