Retractable petal collet backup for a subterranean seal

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8393388
  • Patent Number
    8,393,388
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 16, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 12, 2013
    12 years ago
Abstract
A high expansion plug has multiple sealing elements and an extrusion barrier system that uses overlapping petals in a stack of rings. When setting the plug, the petals are elastically moved toward a surrounding tubular wall in an elastic deformation between a housing that surrounds the mandrel and a tapered ring on the mandrel. That sandwich controls the amount of deformation and allows a potential energy force to be stored in the petals that allows them to return toward their initial position when the set of the plug is released and the seals are allowed to relax and extend axially as they shrink radially. The plug can then be removed without milling. Expansions in the order of 25% of the initial seal dimension are contemplated.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention is high expansion packers and more particularly those that can be retrieved while using overlapping petals to form backup rings.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

High expansion packers are used in through tubing applications where the packer or plug is then set in casing below the tubing through which it was delivered. Some designs provided cup shaped backup ring stacks that has staggered slots as between layers as an extrusion barrier in expansion ranges up to 25%. U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,150 is an illustration of one such design. Others are U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,145; US Publication 2004/0149429 and 2005/0115720. Other high expansion packer designs are U.S. Pat. No. Re 32,831; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,311,778; 6,318,461 and 6,164,375.


The high expansion designs have focused on the need to prevent extrusion as a result of the combination of high expansion and differential pressure. The stack of backup rings were deformed against the surrounding tubular in a way that made the high expansion plug of the prior design removable by milling it apart. What has been needed in high expansion applications is a retrievable design that performs as needed to prevent element extrusion under pressure differentials typically seen for such plugs.


The present invention addresses this issue by using an overlapping petal design for the backup rings but disposing the rings in a manner where the assembly has a low profile for run in and that guides the flexing of the petals toward the surrounding tubular when in the set position. Support is offered to the petals by a housing on one side and a tapered guide ring on another side. As a result the petals elastically deform to act as a backup to the sealing elements and when the plug is unset and the sealing elements are able to release from the surrounding tubular using the stored potential energy from the elastic deformation that occurred when the plug was set. Minor image orientations of sealing elements and backup rings address differential pressures in opposed directions. Those skilled in the art will better understand the invention from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while recognizing that the full scope of the invention is determined by the claims appended below.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A high expansion plug has multiple sealing elements and an extrusion barrier system that uses overlapping petals in a stack of rings. When setting the plug, the petals are elastically moved toward a surrounding tubular wall in an elastic deformation between a housing that surrounds the mandrel and a tapered ring on the mandrel. That sandwich controls the amount of deformation and allows a potential energy force to be stored in the petals that allows them to return toward their initial position when the set of the plug is released and the seals are allowed to relax and extend axially as they shrink radially. The plug can then be removed without milling. Expansions in the order of more than 25% of the initial seal dimension are contemplated.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1
a-1b show the plug in the run in position;



FIGS. 2
a-2b show the plug in the set position;



FIG. 3 is an enlarged view showing the petal assembly extending into its supporting housing.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT


FIG. 1
a is the upper end of the plug 10 while FIG. 1b is the mirror image lower end of the plug 10. A mandrel 12 extends into both parts of FIG. 1 and supports the sealing element 14.


A backup ring 20 that is preferably PTFE or Amadil® is adjacent to a ramp ring 22. Both rings are mounted over the mandrel 12 and are slidably mounted with respect to the mandrel 12. Ring 21 sits on the mandrel 12 and is preferably made of PEEK. It is there to resist extrusion of the element 14 along the mandrel 12 as shown in FIG. 2. Together they present a barrier for the rubber element 14 to prevent extrusion under and between the petal rings 30 and 32. As seen in FIG. 3 the petal rings or extendable backup rings 30 and 32 are formed from elongated flat steel members that in each ring overlap an adjacent petal. As between rings the spacing is circumferentially staggered so that the petals of one ring are not in alignment with petals of an adjacent ring. While two overlapping rings are shown, other numbers of rings can be used without departing from the invention. The rings of elongated petals are fixed at one end to a base 34 that is disposed inside an annular space 28 defined between a sleeve 26 and the mandrel 12. Sleeve 26 has a taper 27 that selectively contacts the stacked rings 30 and 32 in the FIG. 2 set position on the opposite side from ramp surface 24. The sleeve 26 has an opening 36 through which the mandrel 12 extends so that both the sleeve 26 and the base 34 and the elongated petal rings 30 and 32 that are supported with the base 34 can all be moved when the plug 10 is set by holding the mandrel 12 and using a setting sleeve that is schematically represented as arrow 38 in FIG. 1a. In essence, FIG. 1a is the minor image of FIG. 1b as between the seal 14 and the associated sleeve 40. With this arrangement the seal 14 can be retractably set with expansion ratio of over 25%.


In the set position of FIG. 2 the petal rings 30 and 32 are up against the casing or tubular 42 with the end 44 of the sleeve 40 against the stacked rings 30 and 32 on one side and the seal 14 on the other side. The same goes on at the opposite hand where the ring stacks 30 and 32 are up against the sleeve 26 on one side and the seal 14 on the other side. What has happened as a result of the relative motion created by the setting tool, schematically illustrated as 38 pushing all the parts against a travel stop schematically represented by arrow 18, is that the stacked rings that extend beyond the respective sleeves 26 or 40 have been elastically deflected to contact the surrounding tubular 42 to function as a backup to the adjacent respective seal while at the same time the rings 30 and 32 have been provided with sufficient support from opposing sides to keep them against the tubular 42 in the set position while still allowing the rings to retract if the plug 10 is unset. The reason this happens is that the portion of the overlapping rings 30 and 32 that extend from the respective sleeves is simply elastically bent so that springing back is still possible. The support provided from opposed ends to the petal rings gives them the strength to serve as extrusion barriers in the set position while still being retractable.



FIG. 3 shows two adjacent overlapping petals 46 and 48 from one ring and another petal 50 from an adjacent ring that is offset from both petals 46 and 48 to illustrate the juxtaposition of the adjacent rings of petals. The petals themselves are elongated preferably metallic structures that can have parallel sides or can flare toward the end extending from the adjacent sleeve. The sleeves can be secured for run in with shear pins or other breakable retainers. While mirror image configurations are preferred, other options are envisioned such as using only as single seal with the petal type backup to resist differential in a single direction rather than in the opposed directions as described above. Alternatively, there can be more than a single seal with the associated backup as described above that resists pressure differential in a given direction.


The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below.

Claims
  • 1. A high expansion retrievable plug for subterranean use, comprising: a mandrel supporting at least one sealing element set by compression to selectively seal against and release from a surrounding wall at a subterranean location;at least one extendable backup ring mounted to a support, said backup ring disposed between said sealing element and said support, whereupon compression of said sealing element said backup ring flexes to contact said wall and said sealing element;said support comprises a ramp on one side of said backup ring on which said backup ring slides and a ramped member on an opposite side of said backup ring from said ramp and initially axially spaced from said backup ring, whereupon axial compression of said sealing element said ramped member initially moves axially with respect to said sliding backup ring as said sliding backup ring slides on said ramp so that said ramped member then contacts said backup ring to retain said backup ring in contact with said wall and said sealing element.
  • 2. The plug of claim 1, wherein: said backup ring retracts from the wall when said compressive force acting on said sealing element is removed.
  • 3. The plug of claim 1, wherein: said support comprises an annular shape surrounding said mandrel to define an open annular space therebetween; anda taper disposed at an open end of said support.
  • 4. The plug of claim 3, wherein: said backup ring comprising a plurality of overlapping petals that extend beyond said taper and having a base within said annular space.
  • 5. The plug of claim 4, wherein: said at least one backup ring comprises a plurality of backup rings each having a plurality of overlapping petals with the petals of one ring circumferentially offset from the petals in an adjacent ring so that petal side surfaces are not in alignment.
  • 6. The plug of claim 5, wherein: said at least one sealing element comprises a plurality of sealing elements each with an associated backup ring, wherein at least two backup rings are oriented in minor image.
  • 7. The plug of claim 6, wherein: said sealing elements expand over 25% to contact the wall in the set position.
  • 8. The plug of claim 1, wherein: said backup ring comprising a plurality of overlapping petals that extend beyond said support.
  • 9. The plug of claim 8, wherein: said at least one backup ring comprises a plurality of backup rings each having a plurality of overlapping petals with the petals of one ring circumferentially offset from the petals in an adjacent ring so that petal side surfaces are not in alignment.
  • 10. The plug of claim 9, wherein: said petals comprise elongated flat metallic members with parallel or tapered side surfaces.
  • 11. The plug of claim 8, wherein: said petals are elastically deformed to contact the wall and supported when contacting said wall by a tapered member located between said petals and said sealing element on one side and said support on the opposite side of said petals.
  • 12. The plug of claim 11, wherein: said support is selectively movable with respect to said mandrel and has a leading taper to contact said petals.
  • 13. The plug of claim 12, wherein: said support comprises an annular shape surrounding said mandrel to define an open annular space therebetween; andsaid leading taper disposed at an open end of said support.
  • 14. The plug of claim 13, wherein: said overlapping petals extend beyond said leading taper and having a base within said annular space.
  • 15. The plug of claim 14, wherein: said petals move away from said wall when compression on said sealing element is released.
  • 16. The plug of claim 15, wherein: said sealing element expands over 25% to contact the wall in the set position.
US Referenced Citations (79)
Number Name Date Kind
3292938 Tamplen Dec 1966 A
3420307 Conrad Jan 1969 A
3450204 Brown et al. Jun 1969 A
3554280 Tucker Jan 1971 A
3666010 Harris May 1972 A
4281840 Harris Aug 1981 A
4611658 Salerni et al. Sep 1986 A
4745972 Bell et al. May 1988 A
4765404 Bailey et al. Aug 1988 A
RE32831 Shonrock et al. Jan 1989 E
5215145 Ross Jun 1993 A
5261492 Duell et al. Nov 1993 A
5271468 Streich et al. Dec 1993 A
5390737 Jacobi et al. Feb 1995 A
5511620 Baugh et al. Apr 1996 A
5613555 Sorem et al. Mar 1997 A
5678635 Dunlap et al. Oct 1997 A
5701954 Kilgore et al. Dec 1997 A
5829524 Flanders et al. Nov 1998 A
5857520 Mullen et al. Jan 1999 A
5941313 Arizmendi Aug 1999 A
5944102 Kilgore et al. Aug 1999 A
6112811 Kilgore et al. Sep 2000 A
6164375 Carisella Dec 2000 A
6311778 Carisella et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318460 Swor et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318461 Carisella Nov 2001 B1
6536532 Doane Mar 2003 B2
6666276 Yokley et al. Dec 2003 B1
6695051 Smith et al. Feb 2004 B2
6705615 Milberger et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712153 Turley et al. Mar 2004 B2
6715560 Doane et al. Apr 2004 B2
6769491 Zimmerman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779602 Van Bilderbeek et al. Aug 2004 B1
6796376 Frazier Sep 2004 B2
6827150 Luke Dec 2004 B2
6848505 Richard et al. Feb 2005 B2
6962206 Hirth et al. Nov 2005 B2
7004248 Hoffman et al. Feb 2006 B2
7128145 Mickey Oct 2006 B2
7373973 Smith et al. May 2008 B2
7392841 Murray et al. Jul 2008 B2
7475736 Lehr et al. Jan 2009 B2
7478679 Berzin et al. Jan 2009 B2
7510015 Corre et al. Mar 2009 B2
7552768 O'Brien Jun 2009 B2
7578353 Cook et al. Aug 2009 B2
7621322 Arnold et al. Nov 2009 B2
RE41118 Brezinski et al. Feb 2010 E
7717179 Rayssiguier et al. May 2010 B2
7743825 O'Malley et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743836 Cook et al. Jun 2010 B2
7789137 Turley et al. Sep 2010 B2
8037942 Vinson et al. Oct 2011 B2
8127978 Castillo et al. Mar 2012 B2
8151873 Lee et al. Apr 2012 B1
20030226659 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030226668 Zimmerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040036225 Ritter et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040069502 Luke Apr 2004 A1
20040149429 Dilber et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040216868 Owen, Sr. Nov 2004 A1
20050115720 MacKenzie et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060289173 Conaway et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070056725 Lucas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070102165 Slup et al. May 2007 A1
20070199693 Kunz Aug 2007 A1
20070199716 Ruttley et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070210525 Saltel Sep 2007 A1
20080060821 Smith et al. Mar 2008 A1
20090065191 Reid et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090145614 Cook et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090255690 Conner et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100258311 Craig et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100276137 Nutley et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110036561 Bishop et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110079383 Porter et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110315373 O'Connell Dec 2011 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Garfield, Garry, et al., “Recent Metal-to-Metal Sealing Technology for Zonal Isolation Applications Demonstrates Potential for Use in Hostile HP/HT Environments”, SPE/IADC 105854, Feb. 2007, 1-4.
Aldrige, Don, “Multi Zone Completions Design Considerations”, SPE 35229, Mar. 1996, 671-674.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120037355 A1 Feb 2012 US