According to principles of the embodiments as disclosed herein, a sound dampening stud pair is provided which allows for sound separation through acoustically isolated framing members. Framing studs are provided which are preassembled as a pair of studs having a acoustic dampening material therebetween. The acoustic dampening dual-stud construction allows for structural reinforcement of the wall, maintaining sound transmission separation. Good sound isolation is provided between adjacent structural rooms and different building elements. Further, because the dual stud comes as a single unitary completed product, this provides the ability to build an acoustically separated wall in fewer phases and much more quickly. In addition, the prefabricated acoustic isolation dual stud greatly increases the useable square footage of the building while providing an equal or, in many instances, a better STC rating than was possible with conventional materials.
Further, providing the dual studs as completed products significantly decreases the overall construction time and schedule by eliminating steps during the construction process. The acoustically isolated studs can be prefabricated in large numbers at an assembly factory and then delivered as a completed product to the construction site for rapid construction of a single wall having dual studs with a high STC rating that dampens the sound transmitted between rooms.
In the embodiment shown in
In one preferred embodiment, the sound isolating member 20 has a thickness of approximately an inch. In other embodiments, the distance may be different, such as one-half inch or five-eighths inch, as may be desired depending on the thickness of the overall wall to be assembled. The thickness of the flat portion 18 may be in the range of one-half inch or, in some embodiments, one-quarter inch, which should be of sufficient thickness to have the strength to rigidly adhere to each of the metal studs 12, 14 and not break, rip, or tear during shipping to a construction site or when being assembled for construction into a wall.
If different types of material are used, then the acoustic dampening member 16 may have somewhat different dimensions. For example, if a very dense rubber is used, then the flat sheet portion may only be in the range of one-eighth inch and the acoustic isolation member one-half inch or less. On the other hand, if a foam material having large cells is used, which may have more compression, then it may be desired to have somewhat thicker material.
A yet further alternative embodiment is shown in
The embodiments of the type shown in
The embodiment of
As has been shown, the acoustic dampening member 16 can take various forms and be positioned at various locations in order to affix the studs 12, 14 to each other to achieve a unitary sound dampening dual-stud member that can be used in construction.
According to a preferred embodiment, the dual-stud sound-isolation structure 10 is assembled at a construction factory in a mass production assembly operation. The assembly plant for the sound-isolation studs 10 does not need to be near the construction site. The sound-isolation dual-stud members 10 are assembled as complete units at the remote manufacturing facility in the desired lengths, such as 8 feet, 10 feet, 12 feet, and the like. Then they are shipped to the construction location during the building phase and used as the wall studs to form walls between adjacent rooms. The workmen, when building the wall, will take the single unitary dual stud 10, that is composed of the two studs 12, 14, and the acoustic dampening member 16, since it is provided as a single unit, into the desired location in order to build the wall. The worker is, thus, able to place two studs at the same time in a single construction step. In addition, the two studs 12, 14 are acoustically isolated from each other and, therefore, provide a very high STC.
There are a number of types of material which would be acceptable for the acoustic dampening layer 26. This may include various types of rigid materials, rubber, plastic, PVC, foam, sponges, gels, or the like. One material which has been found to be acceptable is a type of material known as IV3, which is a foam cell polymer material.
The ceiling assembly 32 is also adhered to the ceiling by any acceptable technique (that also includes angled members 28 and the acoustic dampening layer 26). The preassembled sound-isolating dual-stud 10 is thereafter placed into the channel which is formed by the two angled members 28 and attached by any acceptable technique, such as sheet metal fastening screws, an adhesive material, or the like. In the example shown in
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. All of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the embodiments can be modified, if necessary to employ concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Technical Field This invention relates to a wall which provides dampening of sound and, in particular, a quick and economical method of constructing a double-stud wall providing significantly improved sound dampening characteristics, while being low in cost. Description of the Related Art At present, many environments desire to have effective sound dampening between adjacent rooms. In many commercial construction locations, such as hospitals, office buildings, and the like, it is desired to have low sound transmission between adjacent rooms. Presently, one method by which this is accomplished is to place thick layers of acoustic insulation in the wall between the rooms and to place studs on either side of the wall. This has the disadvantage of being expensive and time-consuming to construct. Other techniques include placing multiple layers of drywall on the studs of the wall, or specialty drywall products which have high acoustic dampening properties. The disadvantage of this approach is that it is expensive because of the cost of extra materials and labor to install said materials or the high cost of sound dampening specialty Drywall and, in addition, is also time-consuming, which raises labor cost. One measure of the sound dampening characteristics of a wall is called the sound transmission coefficient (STC). The STC of a particular wall provides an indication of the attenuation which the wall provides for acoustic waves and, thus, a good indication of the sound dampening that it provides between adjacent rooms. A standard sheet of drywall, which is a low gypsum board, may have an STC of approximately 26. Thicker drywall may have STCs in the range of 28 and 29. Two drywall panels placed abutting each other, if each is a standard gypsum board, will have an STC of 34. Generally, an STC in the range of 35 or lower indicates that a significant amount of sound will pass from one room to another and the wall provides little attenuation. In order to obtain attenuation in the range of 55-60, which is often desired, it is currently the practice to create two walls, each of which has a set of studs to support the drywall, and then place one or more layers of sound-attenuation material, such as an acoustic dampening insulation or other material, between them. While such a structure is sufficient to obtain an STC in the range of 55 or higher, it is expensive, time-consuming to construct, and also takes some skill to properly assemble. Past attempts to increase the STC of wall assemblies have focused on specialty products which, in many instances, are prohibitively expensive. Other techniques have been to add significant layers of conventional materials that increase the mass, which, while it will increase the STC rating, adds significant cost as well as additional time, and takes up more space. Other attempts have been to use multiple phases in the wall assembly in order to add layers of conventional construction material at the same surface to achieve a higher STC rating. However, this increases the time in which construction can be completed and also increases the cost. The schedule is affected negatively if multiple phases are used for the construction due to more materials having to be installed at the site, which, in turn, requires a longer duration for the phase of work, which impacts the construction schedule along with the additional time. Another downside of using multiple layers of materials or multiple phases is the reduction in floor area that happens if additional layers of materials are added to the wall assembly.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1951346 | Collins | Mar 1934 | A |
3949529 | Porter | Apr 1976 | A |
4107893 | Rensch | Aug 1978 | A |
6125608 | Charlson | Oct 2000 | A |
8516778 | Wilkens | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8720141 | Shembekar | May 2014 | B2 |
8826616 | Gosselin | Sep 2014 | B1 |
20070227095 | Hubbe | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080245603 | Tinianov | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110239573 | Lockhart | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130025966 | Nam | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150361659 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62010898 | Jun 2014 | US |