The invention relates to liquid compositions of bone morphogenetic proteins for improved stability during handling and prolonged storage at reduced temperatures. More specifically, the invention relates to biocompatible liquid compositions comprising GDF-5 in an acidic solution having a pH of from about 3.0 to about 3.6, having improved protein stability during handling and prolonged storage at reduced temperatures.
GDF-5 is a member of the Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP), which is a subclass of the TGF-β superfamily of proteins. GDF-5 includes several variants and mutants, including mGDF-5 first isolated from the mouse by Lee (U.S. Pat. No. 5,801,014). Other variants include MP52, which is the patented name (WO 95/04819) for the human form of GDF-5, which is also known as hGDF-5 and also as LAP-4 (Triantfilou, et al. Nature Immunology 2, 338-345 (2001)); also CDMP-1, an allelic protein variant of hGDF-5 (WO 96/14335); also rhGDF-5, the recombinant human form manufactured in bacteria (EP 0955313); also rhGDF-5-Ala83, a monomeric variant of rhGDF-5; also BMP-14, a collective term for hGDF-5/CDMP-1 like proteins; also Radotermin, the international non-proprietary name designated by the World Health Organization; also HMW MP52's, high molecular weight protein variants of MP52; also C465A, a monomeric version wherein the cysteine residue responsible for the intermolecular cross-link is substituted with alanine; also other active monomers and single amino acid substitution mutants including N445T, L441P, R438L, and R438K. For the purposes of this application the term “GDF-5” is meant to include all variants and mutants of the GDF-5 protein, wherein rhGDF-5 is the exemplary member having 119 amino acids.
All members of the BMP family share common structural features including a carboxy terminal active domain and share a highly conserved pattern of cysteine residues that create three intramolecular disulfide bonds and one intermolecular disulfide bond. The active form can be either a disulfide-bonded homodimer of a single family member or a heterodimer of two different members (see Massague, et al. Annual Review of Cell Biology 6:957 (1990); Sampath, et al. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:13198 (1990); Celeste et al. PNAS 87:9843-47 (1990); U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,691, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,683). The proper folding of the GDF-5 protein and formation of these disulfide bonds are essential to biological functioning, and misfolding leads to inactive aggregates and cleaved fragments.
The production of BMP's from genetically modified bacteria, and of GDF-5 in particular, utilizes plasmid vectors to transform E. coli to produce monomer GDF-5 protein in high yield (see for example Hotten U.S. Pat. No. 6,764,994 and Makishima U.S. Pat. No. 7,235,527). The monomer is obtained from inclusion bodies, purified, and refolded into homodimers of GDF-5 protein to produce the biologically active dimer of the GDF-5 protein. The steps leading to the dimer utilize various pharmaceutically unacceptable materials to modify the solubility in order to enable the separation and purification of the GDF-5 protein.
The degradation of proteins in general has been well described in the literature, but the storage and solubility of bone morphogenetic proteins, particularly GDF-5 has not been well described. BMP-2 is readily soluble at concentrations greater than 1 mg/ml when the pH is below 6, and above pH 6 the solubility can be increased by the addition of 1 M NaCl, 30% isopropanol, or 0.1 mM heparin (Ruppert, et al. Eur J Biochem 237, 295-302 (1996). GDF-5 is nearly insoluble in physiological pH ranges and buffers and is only soluble in water at extreme pH (Honda, et al. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 89(6), 582-589 (2000)). GDF-5 is soluble at an alkaline pH of about 9.5 to 12.0, however proteins degrade quickly under these conditions and thus acidic conditions are used for the preparation of GDF-5 protein.
Biocompatible compositions of the GDF-5 protein present great challenges to obtain reasonable solubility and concurrent stability of the protein. The current method of storage for GDF-5 protein utilizes 10 mM HCl at pH 2 and −80° C. for long-term storage, but even these conditions provide for some degradation of the protein, particularly with repeated freeze-thaw cycles. We performed a trypsin digestion of late eluting species of the GDF-5 protein and found non-tryptic peptide fragments using MALDI-TOF (matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) analysis, indicating acid-catalyzed cleavage of the protein during storage and subsequent aggregation of the fragments. We also separately performed sequential freeze-thaw cycles and prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures of GDF-5 protein solutions. Both of these tests showed degradation of the protein in the current 10 mM HCl storage solvent. Thus there is a need for improved compositions for the handling and storage of GDF-5 protein solutions.
The present invention provides compositions for the handling and long-term storage of GDF-5 solutions at reduced temperatures that provide for improved stability of the GDF-5 protein. By increasing the pH of the storage solution from 2 to about 3, a significant improvement in the stability of the GDF-5 protein is realized, without adversely affecting the solubility of the protein. Suitable solvent systems include, but are not limited to hydrochloric acid (HCl), acetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and phosphoric acid, in amounts to provide a pH of from about 3.0 to about 3.6.
a shows the DSC spectra of GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl.
b shows the DSC spectra of GDF-5 in 1 mM HCl.
c shows the DSC spectra of GDF-5 in 0.01% (v/v) TFA.
d shows the DSC spectra of GDF-5 in 0.01% (v/v) phosphoric acid.
e shows the DSC spectra of GDF-5 in 0.01% (v/v) acetic acid.
a shows an rp-HPLC chromatogram of a GDF-5 reference standard in 10 mM HCl.
b shows an rp-HPLC chromatogram of GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl after 5 freeze-thaw cycles.
c shows an rp-HPLC chromatogram of GDF-5 in 50 mM acetic acid after 5 freeze-thaw cycles.
d shows an rp-HPLC chromatogram of GDF-5 in 0.01% (v/v) TFA after 5 freeze-thaw cycles.
e shows an rp-HPLC chromatogram of GDF-5 in 1 mM HCl after 5 freeze-thaw cycles.
We investigated the use of a number of different solvent systems in order to improve the stability of GDF-5 protein solutions during handling and storage, and herein describe useful compositions for working with this protein. Since it's discovery and the subsequent development of recombinant human forms, GDF-5 has been stored in a 10 mM HCl solvent system at −80° C. to preserve the protein structure. Partly because of its lack of glycosylation, GDF-5 is less soluble than other BMP's, including BMP-2, for which the bulk of the scientific literature is directed to. There are few reports, if any, available on the solubility and stability of GDF-5. The preparation and isolation of the GDF-5 monomer from plasmid transformed bacteria and the subsequent refolding into dimer presents a different set of issues and problems than the handling and storage of the bioactive dimer. On the other hand, working with the mature dimer GDF-5 protein in biocompatible compositions presents a different set of problems, and the literature yields very little physicochemical information regarding the solubility and stability of the GDF-5 protein.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a composition of GDF-5 protein in a solvent system that provides for improved protein stability during handling and storage. It is another object of the present invention to provide a biocompatible solution of GDF-5 protein that is stable during prolonged storage at reduced temperatures. It is another object of the present invention to provide a biocompatible solution of GDF-5 protein that is stable during handling at room temperature. It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of preserving a solution of GDF-5 protein by providing a solvent system having a pH of from about 3.0 to about 3.6, wherein the GDF-5 protein is stabilized and has reduced susceptibility to acid catalyzed cleavage while still maintaining a useful solubility.
For the purposes of this application definitions of the following terms will be useful. The term “GDF-5” is meant to include all synonyms, variants and mutations of the GDF-5 protein molecule, including, but not limited to GDF-5, mGDF-5, hGDF-5, MP-52, LAP-4, radotermin, CDMP-1, C465A, and rhGDF-5, wherein rhGDF-5 is the exemplary member of the group. The term “GDF-5” is also understood to include monomeric GDF-5 proteins, which have also been shown to be biologically active. The term “room temperature”, herein abbreviated as “RT” or “R.T.”, is understood to mean the ambient temperature of an ordinary office or laboratory, being from about 18 to about 25° C. The term “bulk”, as used herein when referring to “bulk protein” or “bulk solution” is understood to mean a solution of GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl and stored at −80° C. after isolation and purification from the production process, and is equivalent with the terms “stock”, “stock protein”, and “stock solution”.
We undertook several studies of bulk GDF-5 solution to determine the extent of protein degradation and the need for improved solvent systems and conditions for the handling and storage of the GDF-5 protein. We performed MALDI-TOF analysis after performing a trypsin digestion of the late eluting peak (aggregates) from extracts of GDF-5 protein isolated from HEALOS™ mineralized collagen sponges, which were loaded with the GDF-5 protein 10 mM HCl solution and subsequently lyophilized. We observed non-tryptic fragments, indicative of acid-catalyzed cleavage of the GDF-5 protein.
In efforts to discover improved compositions for the handling and storage of GDF-5 we examined the physicochemical properties of the protein in five different solvent environments: 10 mM HCl (the current solvent system for bulk protein), 1 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) acetic acid, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 0.01% (v/v) phosphoric acid. MALDI-TOF analysis of the GDF-5 protein was done at the Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Mass. Samples were mixed with sinapinic acid, spotted and allowed to dry on a stainless steel plate, and then analyzed on a Voyager DE-STR mass spectrometer in linear mode (manufactured by Applied Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.). The percentage aggregate estimated by peak height analysis was found to be about 23.5% in 10 mM HCl as opposed to 8-12% in the remaining four solvents. In this estimation, we assumed any mass greater than 27 kDa to be an aggregate. It should be noted that MALDI is not a quantitative technique, so the absolute percentage of aggregates in each solvent is only an approximation. Nevertheless, the data clearly indicated that there was a greater proportion of aggregates in 10 mM HCl than in the other four solvents.
We performed SDS-PAGE analysis of GDF-5 in the same set of solvent systems.
We also performed far UV circular dichroism (CD) of GDF-5 protein in the same five solvent environments (10 mM HCl, 1 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, 0.01% (v/v) acetic acid, and 0.01% (v/v) phosphoric acid). The results are shown in
We performed Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) on GDF-5 protein in the same five solvent environments (10 mM HCl, 1 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) acetic acid, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 0.01% (v/v) phosphoric acid).
In another set of experiments we have shown that even as few as two freeze-thaw cycles of GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl can lead to a substantial increase in fragments and degradation products, as shown by rp-HPLC.
In another group of experiments we investigated the potential of various solvent systems to provide improved stability to liquid GDF-5 protein solutions at temperatures of 2-8° C. and at room temperature (RT, approximately 25° C.). In these experiments the stability of GDF-5 protein was evaluated by rp-HPLC in the following solvent systems: 1.3 mM HCl, 5 mM HCl, 12 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 50 mM acetic acid. Samples of the GDF-5 protein solutions were prepared by dialysis with the selected solvents at 2-8° C. overnight and transferred as aliquots into small vials at about 1 mL/vial and placed accordingly at 2-8° C. or at room temperature. At each designated time point, one vial from each set was removed and stored at −80° C. until the analysis was performed. The results show that GDF-5 was stable in both 50 mM acetic acid (pH 3.3) and 0.01% (v/v) TFA (pH 3.3) solutions at room temperature after three days and in 1.3 mM HCl (pH 3.3) after 2 days, while it was not stable at room temperature in either 5 mM HCl (pH 2.5) or 12 mM HCl (pH 2.1) after 2 days (see
At 2-8° C., the GDF-5 protein was stable for at least 30 days in 50 mM acetic acid or 0.01% (v/v) TFA solution, and stable for at least 6 days in 1.3 mM HCl. In contrast, the GDF-5 protein was degraded in 5 mM HCl and 12 mM HCl solutions at 2-8° C., and formed degradation species after 2 days as evidenced by rp-HPLC (see
The following examples are meant only to be illustrative in nature of the present invention, and not to be limiting in scope. One skilled in the art would easily conceive of other embodiments that would be considered within the scope of the present invention.
Four different solvent systems, 1 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) acetic acid, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 0.01% (v/v) phosphoric acid, were tested for their ability to provide improved GDF-5 protein stability over the standard 10 mM HCl solvent system currently used. Approximately 1-2 ml of bulk GDF-5 protein (3.8 mg/ml) in 10 mM HCl was taken from a freshly thawed sample and dialyzed for 24 hours at 2-8° C. with 3 changes each of 1 liter of test solution to produce a GDF-5 protein solution in each of the four different solvent systems. The concentration of the dialysates was determined from the absorbance value at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 1.16 for a 1 mg/ml solution and a pathlength of 1 cm. The GDF-5 protein solutions were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, Circular Dichroism (CD), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), and MALDI-TOF.
SDS-PAGE
The GDF-5 protein samples were diluted in Bio-Rad 8-16% gradient gel appropriate sample buffer (provided by the manufacturer) either with (reduced) or without (non-reduced) 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The samples were denatured by heating at 90° C. for 5 min and then centrifuged briefly at 5000 rpm. Electrophoresis was carried out at 200 volts constant for 1 hour on an 8-16% Bio-Rad criterion gel with 1× tris-glycine-SDS running buffer. Gels were incubated in 100 mL 10% methanol, 7% acetic acid (Ruby fix/destain solution) for 1 hour on an orbital shaker at 45 rpm. The fix solution was decanted and 80 mL Sypro-Ruby (Bio-Rad) was added. Gels were incubated overnight in the dark on an orbital shaker at 45 rpm. The Sypro-Ruby was decanted and 100 mL destain solution was added. Gels were incubated for 3 hours on an orbital shaker at 45 rpm. Finally, gels were imaged on a Bio-Rad Gel Doc imager.
In the non-reduced gels, a small amount of aggregate was observed, while in the reduced gels there was clear indication of the presence of low molecular weight species, probably resulting from acid cleavage. No significant difference was noted between the migration profiles of GDF-5 reconstituted in the five different solvent environments.
Circular Dichroism
Circular Dichroism was carried out on an AVIV Model 60DS Circular Dichroism Spectropolarimeter. For each sample, scans were taken between 190 and 250 nm. For each scan, data were collected at 1 nm intervals for 2 sec at each interval. The scan temperature was 23° C. The final protein concentration was 0.2 mg/mL. Data represented the average of three scans. A buffer blank was also recorded under identical conditions and the CD spectrum of the buffer blank was subtracted from that of the sample. All runs were made using 0.01% TFA as a blank. Cuvettes had a path length of 1 mm. The scans were normalized using Mean residue weight (a value of 115) and inserting it into the equation:
[θ]=[0.1×Residue]/[conc. (mg/mol)×light path].
The value of [θ] was calculated at each wavelength to give mean residue ellipticities. Finally, an estimate of secondary structure was determined using the program PROSEC v.2.1 (copyright 1987 by AVIV Associates).
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
a through 4e show DSC thermal data for the GDF-5 protein in the five different solvent environments, after instrument baseline and solvent subtraction and concentration normalization. The samples were stored at −80° C.; thawed and degassed under vacuum with stirring for 8 minutes at room temperature prior to loading in the DSC cell and scanned in duplicate at 60° C./hr from 5-100° C. on a MicroCal VP-DSC. The protein concentration was 0.51 mg/mL for all samples. Bulk GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl shows a weak thermal transition with Tm<30° C. and a broad weak transition near 65° C. The heat transfer was significantly poor. In contrast, protein dialyzed against 1 mM HCl, 0.01% TFA and 0.01% phosphoric acid showed a large transition near 40° C. and a smaller endothermic transition near 85° C. In 0.01% acetic acid, the results showed a significant increase in both transitions: TM1˜60° C. and TM2˜94° C. The thermodynamic parameters, namely ΔH and ΔS values were also significantly higher in the 0.01% acetic acid sample. This result suggests that the protein's thermal stability is much greater in an acetic acid environment or at a higher pH. We noted in an earlier study that the C465A monomer, which cannot form an intermolecular disulfide bridge, did not exhibit the first endotherm near 40° C., suggesting that this transition represents disulfide interaction between the two monomer units.
MALDI-TOF:
MALDI-TOF analysis of intact protein in five different solvent environments was done at the Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Mass. Samples were mixed with sinapinic acid, spotted and allowed to dry on a stainless steel plate, and then analyzed on a Voyager DE-STR mass spectrometer in linear mode (manufactured by Applied Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.). No significant difference was noted in the weight average molecular weight of the major dimer as well as the other higher oligomer species in any of these solvents. All five spectra had their 27 kDa peak normalized to 100% relative intensity. The percentage aggregate estimated by peak height analysis was found to be about 23.5% in 10 mM HCl as opposed to 8-12% in the remaining four solvents. In this estimation, we assumed any mass>27 kDa to be an aggregate. It should be noted that MALDI is not a quantitative technique, so the absolute percentage of aggregates in each solvent is only an approximation. Nevertheless, the data clearly indicate that there is a greater proportion of aggregates in 10 mM HCl than in the other four solvents.
Overall, the combined results showed that in each of the four different solvent systems tested GDF-5 protein had good linearity in serial dilution and exhibited improved stability over the 10 mM HCl composition.
An attempt was made to assess solubility of GDF-5 in 20 mM acetic acid. Stock GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl (3.8 mg/mL) was dialyzed against 20 mM acetic acid with a 3,500 MW cut off membrane, then lyophilized, and finally, the dried mass was reconstituted in 20 mM acetic acid. The OD at 280 nm was determined. It was noted that a clear solution was readily obtained with 6.5 mg/mL GDF-5 in 20 mM acetic acid. In a separate attempt the GDF-5 protein in 20 mM acetic acid was lyophilized and then reconstituted in 1 mM HCl. Again, the OD at 280 nm was determined and the results indicated that a clear solution could be readily obtained with a GDF-5 protein concentration of 6.5 mg/mL.
The stability of GDF-5 protein was evaluated through five freeze/thaw cycles in different storage solvents, including 1 mM HCl, 10 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 50 mM acetic acid. Bulk GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl was removed from −80° C. and thawed at 2-8° C. The GDF-5 protein solution was then dialyzed with the selected solvents at 2-8° C. overnight (dialysis cassettes: Pierce, Cat #66380, 10000 MWCO). The dialyzed samples were transferred into small vials at about 1 mL/vial and placed at −80° C. In each freeze/thaw cycle, the test samples were frozen at −80° C. for at least 19 hours and thawed at room temperature for at least 5 hours. At the end of each cycle one vial of each solvent sample was removed and stored at −80° C. prior to analysis so that all the samples were analyzed at same time for visual appearance, rp-HPLC, UV spectroscopy, and pH.
The test samples in glass vials were checked for clarity and particles. The sample vials were inspected using a vertical light against a black background. The clarity of the test samples was compared with a pure water sample. All samples appeared clear and transparent; the GDF-5 protein was still soluble at the concentration of 3.6 mg/mL after the five-freeze/thaw cycles.
A non-reduced rp-HPLC method was used to monitor GDF-5 protein contents and degradation species. Briefly, the test samples were diluted with 1 mM HCl to 0.1 mg GDF-5/mL and the diluted sample (50 μl) was directly injected onto the HPLC column (Vydac 218TP52, C18 column) which was eluted with 0.15% (v/v) TFA in water and 0.15% (v/v) TFA in acetonitrile as the mobile phase. The eluted peaks were monitored at 214 nm. The peak areas were compared to reference standard areas to determine the GDF-5 protein content. The percentage of each peak area was calculated to monitor the changes of the main peak and minor peaks (degradation peaks).
Representative chromatograms are shown in
The protein content was also determined by UV spectroscopy. The test samples were diluted with an appropriate solvent prior to analysis. The concentration of GDF-5 was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 1.16 mL/mg*cm at 280 nm. UV results indicate that there was no significant change in protein concentration in all samples during the course of study. The protein concentrations as determined by UV spectroscopy and HPLC were similar. The pH of the samples was measured directly using a calibrated pH meter without dilution. The pH of all samples was stable and the storage conditions did not shift the pH.
The results show that GDF-5 was stable after 5 freeze/thaw cycles in 1 mM HCl, 50 mM acetic acid, and 0.01% (v/v) TFA solutions. In contrast, GDF-5 was less stable in 10 mM HCl solution and degradation species started forming after the second freeze/thaw cycle.
In this example the stability of GDF-5 protein was evaluated in various acidic solvents including 1.3 mM HCl, 5 mM HCl, 12 mM HCl, 0.01% (v/v) TFA, and 50 mM acetic acid for prolonged exposure to temperatures of 2-8° C. and also at room temperature (approximately 25° C.). Bulk GDF-5 in 10 mM HCl was removed from −80° C. and thawed at 2-8° C. The GDF-5 protein solution was then dialyzed with the selected solvents at 2-8° C. overnight (dialysis cassettes: Pierce, Cat #66380, 10000 MWCO). The dialyzed samples were transferred as aliquots into small vials at about 1 mL/vial and placed accordingly at 2-8° C. or room temperature. At each designated time point, one vial from each set was removed and stored at −80° C. until the analysis was performed using rp-HPLC, UV spectroscopy, and pH meter.
The results show that GDF-5 was stable in both 50 mM acetic acid (pH 3.3) and 0.01% (v/v) TFA (pH 3.3) solutions at room temperature for three days and in 1.3 mM HCl (pH 3.3) for 2 days, while it was not stable at room temperature in either 5 mM HCl (pH 2.5) or 12 mM HCl (pH 2.1). At 2-8° C., GDF-5 protein was stable for at least 30 days in 50 mM acetic acid or 0.01% (v/v) TFA solution, and stable for at least 6 days in 1.3 mM HCl. In contrast, GDF-5 was rapidly degraded in 5 mM HCl as well as in 12 mM HCl solutions at 2-8° C., forming degradation species within 6 days as evidenced on HPLC (see
Although this invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, variations and modifications of the methods and means for increasing the pH of a solution of GDF-5 protein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Such variations and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority from a provisional filing, U.S. App. Pat. No. 60/954,413 entitled “GDF-5 PROTEIN STORAGE,” which was filed on, Aug. 7, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2931802 | Touey | Apr 1960 | A |
4120810 | Palmer | Oct 1978 | A |
4891319 | Roser | Jan 1990 | A |
5011691 | Oppermann | Apr 1991 | A |
5013649 | Wang | May 1991 | A |
5202311 | Folkman | Apr 1993 | A |
5231169 | Constantz | Jul 1993 | A |
5266683 | Oppermann | Nov 1993 | A |
5318898 | Israel | Jun 1994 | A |
5385887 | Yim | Jan 1995 | A |
5411941 | Grinna | May 1995 | A |
5455231 | Constantz | Oct 1995 | A |
5516654 | Israel | May 1996 | A |
5658882 | Celeste | Aug 1997 | A |
5747058 | Tipton | May 1998 | A |
5770700 | Webb | Jun 1998 | A |
5776193 | Kwan | Jul 1998 | A |
5801014 | Lee | Sep 1998 | A |
5804557 | Cleland | Sep 1998 | A |
5866165 | Liu | Feb 1999 | A |
5955448 | Colaco | Sep 1999 | A |
5968542 | Tipton | Oct 1999 | A |
5972385 | Liu | Oct 1999 | A |
5985320 | Edwards | Nov 1999 | A |
6051558 | Burns | Apr 2000 | A |
6071428 | Franks | Jun 2000 | A |
6165981 | Flaa | Dec 2000 | A |
6171584 | Hotten et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171586 | Lam | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187742 | Wozney | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6207718 | Papadimitriou | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6281195 | Rueger | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284872 | Celeste | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288043 | Spiro | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6340369 | Ferree | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344058 | Ferree | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352557 | Ferree | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6407060 | Charette | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419702 | Ferree | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454804 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6551801 | Andou | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6645247 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648918 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648919 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648920 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6656492 | Kajiyama | Dec 2003 | B2 |
RE38385 | Franks et al. | Jan 2004 | E |
6685695 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6719968 | Celeste | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723170 | Ohashi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755863 | Ferree | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764994 | Hötten | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6780324 | Le Garrec | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6911411 | Cox | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6936582 | Charette | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6991790 | Lam | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992065 | Okumu | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7060268 | Andya | Jun 2006 | B2 |
RE39497 | Kono et al. | Feb 2007 | E |
7235527 | Makishima | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7318840 | McKay | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323445 | Zhang | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7375077 | Mao | May 2008 | B2 |
7435260 | Ferree | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7572440 | Vukicevic | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7678764 | Garigapati | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20010024823 | Vukicevic | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020032155 | Ferree | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128718 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165542 | Ferree | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173770 | Flory | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030026788 | Ferree | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030185812 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192554 | Ferree | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040022771 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024471 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028733 | Tracy | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040132653 | Ichikawa | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040146923 | Celeste | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040197324 | Liu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050069571 | Slivka | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050119754 | Trieu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050191248 | Hunter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060024346 | Brody | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060088565 | Kohnert | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121113 | Bartholomaeus | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060223120 | Kim | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286171 | Zhou | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286289 | Prajapati | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287676 | Prajapati | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070053871 | Li | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070098756 | Behnam | May 2007 | A1 |
20070172479 | Warne | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178159 | Chen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080098614 | Tchessalov | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147077 | Garigapati | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234727 | Garigapati | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080311078 | Gokarn | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090004048 | Elliott | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030483 | Risi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043078 | Daniel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048412 | Soula | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060976 | Rueger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099089 | Zhang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090259023 | Su | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286764 | Kipp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291062 | Fraunhofer | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015230 | Ron | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100041870 | Tchessalov | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100130730 | Garigapati | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144631 | Ron | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100255100 | Margolin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
955313 | Nov 1999 | EP |
957943 | May 2003 | EP |
1350525 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1448246 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1462126 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1274459 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1604693 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1604963 | Dec 2005 | EP |
955313 | May 2006 | EP |
1915986 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1932519 | Jun 2008 | EP |
957943 | Nov 2008 | EP |
WO 8800205 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9011366 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9118098 | Nov 1991 | WO |
WO 9200382 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9309229 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9316099 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO 9410203 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9415949 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9415965 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9415966 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9421681 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9426892 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9426893 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9501801 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO9504819 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9510539 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9510802 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9516035 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9533830 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9601316 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9601845 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO9614335 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9636710 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO0178683 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 03000282 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03030923 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03043673 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03043673 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03066120 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2004037265 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052336 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005060989 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005100399 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005107765 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005115438 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006138099 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2006138099 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2006138181 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007025441 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2008009419 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008045498 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008049588 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008079672 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008082563 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008099190 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008099198 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008143867 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009006097 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009006301 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009015736 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009016131 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009016333 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009020744 | Feb 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090043078 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60954413 | Aug 2007 | US |