Subterranean treatment fluids comprising a degradable bridging agent and methods of treating subterranean formations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7829507
  • Patent Number
    7,829,507
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 17, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 9, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to bridging agents for use in subterranean formations, to well drill-in and servicing fluids comprising such bridging agents, and to methods of using such bridging agents and well drill-in and servicing fluids in subterranean drilling operations. An example of a well drill-in and servicing fluid of the present invention comprises a viscosified fluid, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to bridging agents for use in subterranean formations, to well drill-in and servicing fluids comprising such bridging agents, and to methods of using such bridging agents and well drill-in and servicing fluids in subterranean drilling operations.


2. Description of Related Art


Often, once drilling of a well bore in a subterranean formation has been initiated, an operator will employ a fluid referred to as a “well drill-in and servicing fluid.” As referred to herein, the term “well drill-in and servicing fluid” will be understood to mean a fluid placed in a subterranean formation from which production has been, is being, or may be cultivated. For example, an operator may begin drilling a subterranean borehole using a drilling fluid, cease drilling at a depth just above that of a productive formation, circulate a sufficient quantity of a well drill-in and servicing fluid through the bore hole to completely flush out the drilling fluid, then proceed to drill into the desired formation using the well drill-in and servicing fluid. Well drill-in and servicing fluids are often utilized, inter alia, to minimize damage to the permeability of such formations.


Well drill-in and servicing fluids may also include “fluid loss control fluids.” As referred to herein, the term “fluid loss control fluid” will be understood to mean a fluid designed to form a filter cake onto a screen or gravel pack, or in some cases, directly onto the formation. For example, a fluid loss control fluid may comprise a comparatively small volume of fluid designed to form a filter cake so as to plug off a “thief zone” (a formation, most commonly encountered during drilling operations, into which the drilling fluid may be lost). Generally, well drill-in and servicing fluids are designed to form a fast and efficient filter cake on the walls of the well bores within the producing formations to minimize leak-off and damage. The filter cake is removed before hydrocarbons from the formation are produced. Conventionally, removal has been by contacting the filter cake with one or more subsequent fluids.


Other conventional methods of removing the filter cake include formulating the well drill-in and servicing fluid so as to include an acid-soluble particulate solid bridging agent. The resultant filter cake formed by such well drill-in and servicing fluid is then contacted with a strong acid to ultimately dissolve the bridging agent. This method is problematic, however, because the strong acid often corrodes metallic surfaces and completion equipment such as sand control screens, thereby causing such equipment to prematurely fail. Further, the acid may damage the producing formation. Additionally, the acid may cause the bridging agent to dissolve too quickly, resulting in the acid being lost into the formation, rather than completely covering the filter cake.


Another method has been to use a water-soluble particulate solid bridging agent in the well drill-in and servicing fluid, which is later contacted with an aqueous salt solution that is undersaturated with respect to such bridging agents. This method is problematic, however, because such bridging agents may require a relatively long period of time to dissolve in the solutions, due to, inter alia, the presence of various gelling agents in the well drill-in and servicing fluids. Such gelling agents shield the water-soluble bridging agents. A further problem is that the aqueous salt solution has a limited range of possible densities.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to bridging agents for use in subterranean formations, to well drill-in and servicing fluids comprising such bridging agents, and to methods of using such bridging agents and well drill-in and servicing fluids in subterranean drilling operations.


An example of a method of the present invention comprises the steps of: placing a well drill-in and servicing fluid in a subterranean formation, the well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosifier, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material; and forming a self-degrading filter cake comprising the bridging agent upon a surface within the formation whereby fluid loss to the formation through the self-degrading filter cake is reduced.


Another example of a method of the present invention comprises a method of degrading a filter cake in a subterranean formation, the filter cake having been deposited therein by a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a bridging agent, comprising the step of utilizing a bridging agent comprising a degradable material.


Another example of a method of the present invention comprises a method of drilling an open hole in a subterranean formation, comprising the steps of: circulating through a drill pipe and drill bit a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosified fluid, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material; forming a filter cake comprising the bridging agent upon a surface within the formation; and permitting the filter cake to degrade.


An example of a composition of the present invention is a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosified fluid; a fluid loss control additive; and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material.


The features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of the preferred embodiments, which follows.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a graphical representation of the results of a dynamic filtration test performed on seven exemplary embodiments of filter cakes formed from well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention.



FIG. 2 depicts a graphical representation of the results of a break test performed on seven exemplary embodiments of filter cakes formed from well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention relates to bridging agents for use in subterranean formations, to well drill-in and servicing fluids comprising such bridging agents, and to methods of using such bridging agents and well drill-in and servicing fluids in subterranean drilling operations.


The well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention generally comprise a viscosified fluid comprising a viscosifier, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation downhole. The term “irreversible” as used herein means that the degradable material once degraded should not recrystallize or reconsolidate while downhole, e.g., the degradable material should degrade in situ but should not recrystallize or reconsolidate in situ. The terms “degradation” or “degradable” refer to both the two relatively extreme cases of hydrolytic degradation that the degradable material may undergo, i.e., heterogeneous (or bulk erosion) and homogeneous (or surface erosion), and any stage of degradation in between these two. This degradation can be a result of, inter alia, a chemical or thermal reaction or a reaction induced by radiation.


A variety of viscosified fluids may be included in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention. These are fluids whose viscosities have been enhanced by the use of a viscosifier. In certain embodiments, the viscosified fluid may comprise a base fluid such as water, oil, or mixtures thereof. The viscosified fluid is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 68% to about 99% by weight. In certain preferred embodiments, the viscosified fluid is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 90% to about 97% by weight.


The viscosified fluids comprise a viscosifier. A variety of viscosifiers may be included in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention. Examples of suitable viscosifiers include, inter alia, biopolymers such as xanthan and succinoglycan, cellulose derivatives such as hydroxyethylcellulose and guar and its derivatives such as hydroxypropyl guar. In certain preferred embodiments, the viscosifier is xanthan. The viscosifier is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention in an amount sufficient to suspend the bridging agent and drill cuttings in the well drill-in and servicing fluid. More particularly, the viscosifier is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention in an amount in the range of from about 0.01% to about 0.6% by weight. In certain preferred embodiments, the viscosifier is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 0.13% to about 0.30% by weight.


The well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention further comprise a fluid loss control additive. A variety of fluid loss control additives can be included in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention, including, inter alia, starch, starch ether derivatives, hydroxyethylcellulose, cross-linked hydroxyethylcellulose, and mixtures thereof. In certain preferred embodiments, the fluid loss control additive is starch. The fluid loss control additive is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention in an amount sufficient to provide a desired degree of fluid loss control. More particularly, the fluid loss control additive is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 0.01% to about 3% by weight. In certain preferred embodiments, the fluid loss control additive is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 1% to about 2% by weight.


The well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention further comprise a bridging agent comprising a degradable material. The bridging agent becomes suspended in the well drill-in and servicing fluid and, as the well drill-in and servicing fluid begins to form a filter cake within the subterranean formation, the bridging agent becomes distributed throughout the resulting filter cake, most preferably uniformly. In certain preferred embodiments, the filter cake forms upon the face of the formation itself, upon a sand screen, or upon a gravel pack. After the requisite time period dictated by the characteristics of the particular degradable material utilized, the degradable material undergoes an irreversible degradation. This degradation, in effect, causes the degradable material to substantially be removed from the filter cake. As a result, voids are created in the filter cake. Removal of the degradable material from the filter cake allows produced fluids to flow more freely.


Generally, the bridging agent comprising the degradable material is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount sufficient to create an efficient filter cake. As referred to herein, the term “efficient filter cake” will be understood to mean a filter cake comprising no material beyond that required to provide a desired level of fluid loss control. In certain embodiments, the bridging agent comprising the degradable material is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount ranging from about 0.1% to about 32% by weight. In certain preferred embodiments, the bridging agent comprising the degradable material is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in the range of from about 3% and about 10% by weight. In certain preferred embodiments, the bridging agent is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluids in an amount sufficient to provide a fluid loss of less than about 15 mL in tests conducted according to the procedures set forth by API Recommended Practice (RP) 13. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize an optimum concentration of degradable material that provides desirable values in terms of enhanced ease of removal of the filter cake at the desired time without undermining the stability of the filter cake during its period of intended use.


Nonlimiting examples of suitable degradable materials that may be used in conjunction with the present invention include but are not limited to degradable polymers, dehydrated compounds, and/or mixtures of the two. In choosing the appropriate degradable material, one should consider the degradation products that will result. Also, these degradation products should not adversely affect other operations or components. For example, a boric acid derivative may not be included as a degradable material in the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention where such fluids utilize xanthan as the viscosifier, because boric acid and xanthan are generally incompatible. One of ordinary skill in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, will be able to recognize when potential components of the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention would be incompatible or would produce degradation products that would adversely affect other operations or components.


As for degradable polymers, a polymer is considered to be “degradable” herein if the degradation is due to, inter alia, chemical and/or radical process such as hydrolysis, oxidation, enzymatic degradation, or UV radiation. The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbone structure. For instance, the presence of hydrolyzable and/or oxidizable linkages in the backbone often yields a material that will degrade as described herein. The rates at which such polymers degrade are dependent on the type of repetitive unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, surface area, and additives. Also, the environment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how the polymer degrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like.


Suitable examples of degradable polymers that may be used in accordance with the present invention include but are not limited to those described in the publication of Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 157 entitled “Degradable Aliphatic Polyesters” edited by A. C. Albertsson. Specific examples include homopolymers, random, block, graft, and star- and hyper-branched aliphatic polyesters. Such suitable polymers may be prepared by polycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radical polymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations, and coordinative ring-opening polymerization for, e.g., lactones, and any other suitable process. Specific examples of suitable polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran or cellulose; chitin; chitosan; proteins; orthoesters; aliphatic polyesters; poly(lactide); poly(glycolide); poly(ε-caprolactone); poly(hydroxybutyrate); poly(anhydrides); aliphatic polycarbonates; poly(orthoesters); poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxide); and polyphosphazenes. Of these suitable polymers, aliphatic polyesters and polyanhydrides are preferred.


Aliphatic polyesters degrade chemically, inter alia, by hydrolytic cleavage. Hydrolysis can be catalyzed by either acids or bases. Generally, during the hydrolysis, carboxylic end groups are formed during chain scission, and this may enhance the rate of further hydrolysis. This mechanism is known in the art as “autocatalysis,” and is thought to make polymer matrices more bulk eroding.


Suitable aliphatic polyesters have the general formula of repeating units shown below:




embedded image



where n is an integer between 75 and 10,000 and R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, acetyl, heteroatoms, and mixtures thereof. Of the suitable aliphatic polyesters, poly(lactide) is preferred. Poly(lactide) is synthesized either from lactic acid by a condensation reaction or more commonly by ring-opening polymerization of cyclic lactide monomer. Since both lactic acid and lactide can achieve the same repeating unit, the general term poly(lactic acid) as used herein refers to writ of formula I without any limitation as to how the polymer was made such as from lactides, lactic acid, or oligomers, and without reference to the degree of polymerization or level of plasticization.


The lactide monomer exists generally in three different forms: two stereoisomers L- and D-lactide and racemic D,L-lactide (meso-lactide). The oligomers of lactic acid, and oligomers of lactide are defined by the formula:




embedded image



where m is an integer: 2≦m≦75. Preferably m is an integer: 2≦m≦10. These limits correspond to number average molecular weights below about 5,400 and below about 720, respectively. The chirality of the lactide units provides a means to adjust, inter alia, degradation rates, as well as physical and mechanical properties. Poly(L-lactide), for instance, is a semicrystalline polymer with a relatively slow hydrolysis rate. This could be desirable in applications of the present invention where a slower degradation of the degradable material is desired. Poly(D,L-lactide) may be a more amorphous polymer with a resultant faster hydrolysis rate. This may be suitable for other applications where a more rapid degradation may be appropriate. The stereoisomers of lactic acid may be used individually or combined in accordance with the present invention. Additionally, they may be copolymerized with, for example, glycolide or other monomers like ε-caprolactone, 1,5-dioxepan-2-one, trimethylene carbonate, or other suitable monomers to obtain polymers with different properties or degradation times. Additionally, the lactic acid stereoisomers can be modified by blending high and low molecular weight polylactide or by blending polylactide with other polyesters.


Plasticizers may be present in the polymeric degradable materials of the present invention. The plasticizers may be present in an amount sufficient to provide the desired characteristics, for example, (a) more effective compatibilization of the melt blend components, (b) improved processing characteristics during the blending and processing steps, and (c) control and regulation of the sensitivity and degradation of the polymer by moisture. Suitable plasticizers include but are not limited to derivatives of oligomeric lactic acid, selected from the group defined by the formula:




embedded image



where R is a hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, acetyl, heteroatom, or a mixture thereof and R is saturated, where R′ is a hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, acetyl, heteroatom, or a mixture thereof and R′ is saturated, where R and R′cannot both be hydrogen, where q is an integer: 2≦q≦75; and mixtures thereof. Preferably q is an integer; 2≦q≦10. As used herein the term “derivatives of oligomeric lactic acid” includes derivatives of oligomeric lactide.


Aliphatic polyesters useful in the present invention may be prepared by substantially any of the conventionally known manufacturing methods such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,323,307; 5,216,050; 4,387,769; 3,912,692; and 2,703,316, the relevant disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the other qualities above, the plasticizers may enhance the degradation rate of the degradable polymeric materials.


Polyanhydrides are another type of particularly suitable degradable polymer useful in the present invention. Polyanhydride hydrolysis proceeds, inter alia, via free carboxylic acid chain-ends to yield carboxylic acids as final degradation products. The erosion time can be varied over a broad range of changes in the polymer backbone. Examples of suitable polyanhydrides include poly(adipic anhydride), poly(suberic anhydride), poly(sebacic anhydride), and poly(dodecanedioic anhydride). Other suitable examples include but are not limited to poly(maleic anhydride) and poly(benzoic anhydride).


The physical properties of degradable polymers depend on several factors such as the composition of the repeat units, flexibility of the chain, presence of polar groups, molecular mass, degree of branching, crystallinity, orientation, etc. For example, short chain branches reduce the degree of crystallinity of polymers while long chain branches lower the melt viscosity and impart, inter alia, elongational viscosity with tension-stiffening behavior. The properties of the material utilized can be further tailored by blending, and copolymerizing it with another polymer, or by changing the macromolecular architecture (e.g., hyper-branched polymers, star-shaped, or dendrimers, etc.). The properties of any such suitable degradable polymers (e.g., hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, rate of degradation, etc.) can be tailored by introducing select functional groups along the polymer chains. For example, poly(phenyllactide) will degrade at about ⅕th of the rate of racemic poly(lactide) at a pH of 7.4 at 55° C. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will be able to determine the appropriate functional groups to introduce to the polymer chains to achieve the desired physical properties of the degradable polymers.


Dehydrated compounds may be used in accordance with the present invention as a degradable material. A dehydrated compound is suitable for use in the present invention if it will degrade over time as it is rehydrated. For example, a particulate solid anhydrous borate material that degrades over time may be suitable. Specific examples of particulate solid anhydrous borate materials that may be used include but are not limited to anhydrous sodium tetraborate (also known as anhydrous borax), and anhydrous boric acid. These anhydrous borate materials are only slightly soluble in water. However, with time and heat in a subterranean environment, the anhydrous borate materials react with the surrounding aqueous fluid and are hydrated. The resulting hydrated borate materials are substantially soluble in water as compared to anhydrous borate materials and as a result degrade in the aqueous fluid. In some instances, the total time required for the anhydrous borate materials to degrade in an aqueous fluid is in the range of from about 8 hours to about 72 hours depending upon the temperature of the subterranean zone in which they are placed.


Blends of certain degradable materials may also be suitable. One example of a suitable blend of materials is a mixture of poly(lactic acid) and sodium borate where the mixing of an acid and base could result in a neutral solution where this is desirable. Another example would include a blend of poly(lactic acid) and boric oxide, a blend of calcium carbonate and poly(lactic) acid, a blend of magnesium oxide and poly(lactic) acid, and the like. In certain preferred embodiments, the degradable material is calcium carbonate plus poly(lactic) acid. Where a mixture including poly(lactic) acid is used, in certain preferred embodiments the poly(lactic) acid is present in the mixture in a stoichiometric amount, e.g., where a mixture of calcium carbonate and poly(lactic) acid is used, the mixture comprises two poly(lactic) acid units for each calcium carbonate unit. Other blends that undergo an irreversible degradation may also be suitable, if the products of the degradation do not undesirably interfere with either the conductivity of the filter cake or with the production of any of the fluids from the subterranean formation.


The choice of degradable material can depend, at least in part, on the conditions of the well, e.g., well bore temperature. For instance, lactides have been found to be suitable for lower temperature wells, including those within the range of about 60° F. to about 150° F., and polylactides have been found to be suitable for well bore temperatures above this range. Dehydrated salts may also be suitable for higher temperature wells.


Also, we have found that a preferable result is achieved if the degradable material degrades slowly over time as opposed to instantaneously. The slow degradation of the degradable material helps, inter alia, to maintain the stability of the filter cake.


The specific features of the degradable material may be modified so as to maintain the filter cake's filtering capability when the filter cake is intact while easing the removal of the filter cake when such removal becomes desirable. In certain embodiments, the degradable material has a particle size distribution in the range of from about 0.1 micron to about 1.0 millimeters. Whichever degradable material is utilized, the bridging agents may have any shape, including but not limited to particles having the physical shape of platelets, shavings, flakes, ribbons, rods, strips, spheroids, toroids, pellets, tablets, or any other physical shape. One of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize the specific degradable material and the preferred size and shape for a given application.


The filter cake formed by the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention is removed after a desired amount of time by being contacted with a degrading agent. In certain embodiments, the degrading agent comprises water. The source of the degrading agent may be, inter alia, a well drill-in and servicing fluid, such as a gravel pack fluid or a completion brine, for instance. In certain embodiments, the source of the degrading agent may be the bridging agent itself. For example, the bridging agent may comprise a water-containing compound. Any compound containing releasable water may be used as the water-containing compound. As referred to herein, the term “releasable water” will be understood to mean water that may be released under desired downhole conditions, including, inter alia, temperature. In certain embodiments, the water-containing compound may be sodium acetate trihydrate, sodium borate decahydrate, sodium carbonate decahydrate, or the like. In certain preferred embodiments, the water-containing compound is sodium acetate trihydrate.


The filter cake formed by the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention is a “self-degrading” filter cake. As referred to herein, the term “self-degrading filter cake” will be understood to mean a filter cake that may be removed without the need to circulate a separate “clean up” solution or “breaker” through the well bore, such clean up solution or breaker having no purpose other than to degrade the filter cake. Though the filter cakes formed by the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention constitute “self-degrading” filter cakes, an operator may nevertheless occasionally elect to circulate a separate clean up solution through the well bore under certain circumstances, such as when the operator desires to hasten the rate of degradation of the filter cake. In certain embodiments, the bridging agents of the present invention are sufficiently acid-degradable as to be removed by such treatment.


An example of a method of the present invention comprises the steps of: placing a well drill-in and servicing fluid in a subterranean formation, the well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosifier, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material; and forming a self-degrading filter cake comprising the bridging agent upon a surface within the formation whereby fluid loss to the formation through the self-degrading filter cake is reduced. Another example of a method of the present invention comprises a method of degrading a filter cake in a subterranean formation, the filter cake having been deposited therein by a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a bridging agent, comprising the step of utilizing a bridging agent comprising a degradable material.


Another example of a method of the present invention comprises a method of drilling an open hole in a subterranean formation, comprising the steps of: circulating through a drill pipe and drill bit a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosified fluid, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material; forming a filter cake comprising the bridging agent upon a surface within the formation; and permitting the filter cake to degrade.


An example of a well drill-in and servicing fluid of the present invention comprises a viscosified fluid, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent comprising a degradable material.


To facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, the following examples of exemplary embodiments are given. In no way should such examples be read to limit the scope of the invention.


Example 1

A dynamic filtration test was conducted, in a Fann Model 90B dynamic filtration tester, in which seven embodiments of filter cakes of the present invention were constructed. For each of the seven embodiments, a sample composition was formulated comprising 336 mL of a 10% aqueous solution of sodium chloride by weight, to which 0.85 grams of clarified liquid xanthan biopolymer, 7.4 grams of a non-ionic starch derivative, 20 grams of powdered polylactic acid, and 30 grams of calcium carbonate were added. This sample composition was then hot rolled for 16 hours at 150° F.


The dynamic filtration test comprised constructing filter cakes on the inner diameter of a synthetic core comprising “ALOXIT™” having a 35 micron pore throat size. The filter cakes were constructed by continuously shearing each sample composition inside the core for an hour while applying a differential pressure of 500 psid, during which time the filter cake formed on the core's inner diameter. The porous nature of the core provides the potential for fluid to leak outward in a radial direction, with the filtrate rate and volume being dependent on the integrity of the filter cake deposited on the core. The volume of filtrate for a particular sample composition was collected and recorded with time. The test concluded after 60 minutes. The results are depicted in Table 1 below, and in FIG. 1.











TABLE 1









Total Filtrate Volume (mL)















Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Time
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition


(minutes)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

















0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


10
5.64
6.20
6.14
5.33
5.42
5.68
6.33


20
6.92
7.45
7.45
6.62
6.74
6.86
7.66


30
7.84
8.48
8.53
7.72
7.79
7.88
8.83


40
8.70
9.32
9.44
8.65
8.76
8.76
9.76


50
9.56
10.11
10.24
9.55
9.62
9.58
10.63


60
10.26
10.8
11.03
10.34
10.35
10.36
11.44









The above example demonstrates, inter alia, that the well drill-in and servicing fluids of the present invention may be used to provide filter cakes having acceptable filtration leak off, as well as that the integrity of such filter cakes is generally repeatable over a series of tests.


Example 2

The seven sample filter cakes prepared in Example 1 were then each subjected to a break test, in which a 10% aqueous solution of sodium chloride by weight was injected into the core at 50 psi differential pressure. Break tests for Sample Compositions 1, 2, 4, and 6 were conducted at 200° F., while break tests for Sample Compositions 3, 5 and 7 were performed at 180° F. As the sodium chloride solution began to break down each filter cake, the amount of filtrate (e.g., the amount of broken filter cake) was collected and measured. The break test continued until such time as the maximum filtrate volume (50 mL) of a particular sample was collected in the Model 90B dynamic filtration tester. The results are illustrated in Table 2 below and in FIG. 2.











TABLE 2









Time (hrs)














Total
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample


Filtrate
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition


Volume (mL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

















0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


5
1.71
2.25
2.25
2.07
1.45
1.51
1.59


10
3.59
5.06
5.28
4.11
3.49
2.66
3.07


15
5.39
7.64
7.13
5.82
5.43
3.53
4.52


20
6.73
9.97
8.90
6.41
7.36
4.65
5.29


25
7.06
11.48
10.7
7.1
9.0
4.84
5.63


30
7.30
12.30
12.27
7.57
9.61
4.9
5.87


35
7.65
12.84
13.47
7.75
10.03
4.97
6.08


40
7.93
13.31
14.38
7.89
10.36
5.03
6.13









The above example illustrates, inter alia, that exemplary embodiments of filter cakes formed from the well drill-in and treatment fluids of the present invention are degradable.


Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of drilling an open hole in a subterranean formation, comprising the steps of: circulating through the drill pipe and drill bit a well drill-in and servicing fluid comprising a viscosified fluid, a fluid loss control additive, and a bridging agent that is a degradable material that comprises an orthoester or a poly(orthoester);forming a self-degrading filter cake comprising the bridging agent within the formation; andpermitting the filter cake to self-degrade.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of forming a self-degrading filter cake comprises forming the filter cake upon the face of the formation itself, upon a sand screen, or upon a gravel pack.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of permitting the filter cake to self-degrade comprises contacting the filter cake with a degrading agent for a period of time such that the bridging agent is dissolved thereby.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein the well drill-in and servicing fluid comprises the degrading agent.
  • 5. The method of claim 3 wherein the degrading agent comprises water.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the degradable material further comprises a degradable polymer or a dehydrated compound.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the degradable polymer comprises at least one degradable polymer selected from the group consisting of a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an orthoester, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(glycolide), a poly(lactide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a polyanhydride, an aliphatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), and a polyphosphazene.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the degradable material further comprises a plasticizer.
  • 9. The method of claim 6 wherein the dehydrated compound comprises anhydrous sodium tetraborate or anhydrous boric acid.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the degradable material comprises a stereoisomer of a poly(lactide).
  • 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the degradable material comprises poly(lactic acid) and a compound chosen from the group consisting of sodium borate, boric oxide, calcium carbonate, and magnesium oxide.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the poly(lactic acid) is present in a stoichiometric amount.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the degradable material has a particle size distribution in the range of from about 0.1 micron to about 1.0 millimeter.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the bridging agent is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount sufficient to create an efficient filter cake.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the bridging agent is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 0.1% to about 30% by weight.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the viscosified fluid comprises a viscosifier; wherein the viscosifier is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 0.13% to about 0.16% by weight; wherein the viscosifier is xanthan; wherein the fluid loss control additive is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount in the range of from about 1% to about 1.3% by weight; wherein the fluid loss control additive is starch; wherein the bridging agent comprising the degradable material is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in the range of from about 1% to about 5% by weight; and wherein the degradable material comprises poly(lactic acid) and either calcium carbonate or magnesium oxide.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the bridging agent is present in the well drill-in and servicing fluid in an amount sufficient to provide a fluid loss of less than about 15 mL per API Recommended Practice 13.
US Referenced Citations (347)
Number Name Date Kind
2238671 Woodhouse Apr 1941 A
2703316 Palmer Mar 1955 A
3173484 Huitt et al. Mar 1965 A
3195635 Fast Jul 1965 A
3272650 MacVittie Sep 1966 A
3302719 Fischer Feb 1967 A
3364995 Atkins et al. Jan 1968 A
3366178 Malone et al. Jan 1968 A
3455390 Gallus Jul 1969 A
3784585 Schmitt et al. Jan 1974 A
3819525 Hattenbrun Jun 1974 A
3828854 Templeton et al. Aug 1974 A
3836465 Rhudy et al. Sep 1974 A
3868998 Lybarger et al. Mar 1975 A
3912692 Casey et al. Oct 1975 A
3948672 Harnsberger Apr 1976 A
3955993 Curtice May 1976 A
3960736 Free et al. Jun 1976 A
3968840 Tate Jul 1976 A
3986355 Klaeger Oct 1976 A
3998272 Maly Dec 1976 A
3998744 Arnold et al. Dec 1976 A
4010071 Colegrove Mar 1977 A
4068718 Cooke, Jr. et al. Jan 1978 A
4169798 DeMartino Oct 1979 A
4172066 Zweigle et al. Oct 1979 A
4261421 Watanabe Apr 1981 A
4265673 Pace et al. May 1981 A
4299825 Lee Nov 1981 A
4387769 Erbstoesser et al. Jun 1983 A
4460052 Gockel Jul 1984 A
4470915 Conway Sep 1984 A
4498995 Gockel Feb 1985 A
4502540 Byham Mar 1985 A
4506734 Nolte Mar 1985 A
4521316 Sikorski Jun 1985 A
4526695 Erbstoesser et al. Jul 1985 A
4632876 Laird et al. Dec 1986 A
4694905 Armbruster Sep 1987 A
4715967 Bellis Dec 1987 A
4716964 Erbstoesser et al. Jan 1988 A
4767706 Levesque Aug 1988 A
4772346 Anderson et al. Sep 1988 A
4785884 Armbruster Nov 1988 A
4793416 Mitchell Dec 1988 A
4797262 Dewitz Jan 1989 A
4809783 Hollenbeck et al. Mar 1989 A
4817721 Pober Apr 1989 A
4822500 Dobson et al. Apr 1989 A
4829100 Murphey et al. May 1989 A
4836940 Alexander Jun 1989 A
4843118 Lai et al. Jun 1989 A
4848467 Cantu et al. Jul 1989 A
4863980 Cowan et al. Sep 1989 A
4886354 Welch et al. Dec 1989 A
4894231 Moreau et al. Jan 1990 A
4957165 Cantu et al. Sep 1990 A
4961466 Himes et al. Oct 1990 A
4986353 Clark et al. Jan 1991 A
4986354 Cantu et al. Jan 1991 A
4986355 Casad et al. Jan 1991 A
5034139 Reid et al. Jul 1991 A
5082056 Tackett, Jr. Jan 1992 A
5142023 Gruber et al. Aug 1992 A
5152781 Tang et al. Oct 1992 A
5161615 Hutchins et al. Nov 1992 A
5203834 Hutchins et al. Apr 1993 A
5213446 Dovan May 1993 A
5216050 Sinclair Jun 1993 A
5247059 Gruber et al. Sep 1993 A
5249628 Surjaatmadja Oct 1993 A
5251697 Shuler Oct 1993 A
5295542 Cole et al. Mar 1994 A
5304620 Holtmyer et al. Apr 1994 A
5314031 Hale et al. May 1994 A
5325923 Surjaatmadja et al. Jul 1994 A
5330005 Card et al. Jul 1994 A
5359026 Gruber Oct 1994 A
5360068 Sprunt et al. Nov 1994 A
5363916 Himes et al. Nov 1994 A
5373901 Norman et al. Dec 1994 A
5386874 Laramay et al. Feb 1995 A
5396957 Surjaatmadja et al. Mar 1995 A
5402846 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1995 A
5439055 Card et al. Aug 1995 A
5460226 Lawson et al. Oct 1995 A
5464060 Hale et al. Nov 1995 A
5475080 Gruber et al. Dec 1995 A
5484881 Gruber et al. Jan 1996 A
5487897 Polson et al. Jan 1996 A
5492177 Yeh et al. Feb 1996 A
5496557 Feijen et al. Mar 1996 A
5497830 Boles et al. Mar 1996 A
5499678 Surjaatmadja et al. Mar 1996 A
5501276 Weaver et al. Mar 1996 A
5505787 Yamaguchi Apr 1996 A
5512071 Yam et al. Apr 1996 A
5536807 Gruber et al. Jul 1996 A
5555936 Pirri et al. Sep 1996 A
5591700 Harris et al. Jan 1997 A
5594095 Gruber et al. Jan 1997 A
5602083 Gabrysch et al. Feb 1997 A
5604186 Hunt et al. Feb 1997 A
5607905 Dobson, Jr. et al. Mar 1997 A
5613558 Dillenbeck Mar 1997 A
5670473 Scepanski Sep 1997 A
5697440 Weaver et al. Dec 1997 A
5698322 Tsai et al. Dec 1997 A
5723416 Liao Mar 1998 A
5765642 Surjaatmadja Jun 1998 A
5783527 Dobson et al. Jul 1998 A
5791415 Nguyen et al. Aug 1998 A
5799734 Norman et al. Sep 1998 A
5833000 Weaver et al. Nov 1998 A
5849401 El-Afandi et al. Dec 1998 A
5853048 Weaver et al. Dec 1998 A
5888944 Patel Mar 1999 A
5893416 Read Apr 1999 A
5908073 Nguyen et al. Jun 1999 A
5916849 House Jun 1999 A
5924488 Nguyen et al. Jul 1999 A
5964291 Bourne et al. Oct 1999 A
5977030 House Nov 1999 A
5979557 Card et al. Nov 1999 A
5981447 Chang et al. Nov 1999 A
5996693 Heathman Dec 1999 A
6004400 Bishop et al. Dec 1999 A
6024170 McCabe et al. Feb 2000 A
6028113 Scepanski Feb 2000 A
6047772 Weaver et al. Apr 2000 A
6110875 Tjon-Joe-Pin et al. Aug 2000 A
6114410 Betzold Sep 2000 A
6123159 Brookey et al. Sep 2000 A
6123965 Jacob et al. Sep 2000 A
6131661 Conner et al. Oct 2000 A
6135987 Tsai et al. Oct 2000 A
6143698 Murphey et al. Nov 2000 A
6148917 Brookey et al. Nov 2000 A
6162766 Muir et al. Dec 2000 A
6169058 Le et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172011 Card et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189615 Sydansk Feb 2001 B1
6202751 Chatterji et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209643 Nguyen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6209646 Reddy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214773 Harris et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242390 Mitchell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258755 House et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260622 Blok et al. Jul 2001 B1
6291013 Gibson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6300286 Dobson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6302209 Thompson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308788 Patel et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311773 Todd et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323307 Bigg et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326458 Gruber et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328105 Betzold Dec 2001 B1
6330917 Chatterji et al. Dec 2001 B2
6357527 Norman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364945 Chatterji et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380138 Ischy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387986 Moradi-Araghi et al. May 2002 B1
6390195 Nguyen et al. May 2002 B1
6394185 Constien May 2002 B1
6422314 Todd et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422326 Brookey et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432155 Swazey et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454003 Chang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6485947 Rajgarhia et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488763 Brothers et al. Dec 2002 B2
6494263 Todd Dec 2002 B2
6508305 Brannon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509301 Vollmer et al. Jan 2003 B1
6527051 Reddy et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554071 Reddy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6566310 Chan May 2003 B2
6569814 Brady et al. May 2003 B1
6578630 Simpson et al. Jun 2003 B2
6586372 Bradbury et al. Jul 2003 B1
6599863 Palmer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6667279 Hessert et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669771 Tokiwa et al. Dec 2003 B2
6681856 Chatterji et al. Jan 2004 B1
6686328 Binder Feb 2004 B1
6691780 Nguyen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6702023 Harris et al. Mar 2004 B1
6702044 Reddy et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710019 Sawdon et al. Mar 2004 B1
6716797 Brookey Apr 2004 B2
6737385 Todd et al. May 2004 B2
6761218 Nguyen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6763888 Harris et al. Jul 2004 B1
6764981 Eoff et al. Jul 2004 B1
6793018 Dawson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6793730 Reddy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6806235 Mueller et al. Oct 2004 B1
6817414 Lee Nov 2004 B2
6818594 Freeman et al. Nov 2004 B1
6837309 Boney et al. Jan 2005 B2
6883608 Parlar et al. Apr 2005 B2
6896058 Munoz, Jr. et al. May 2005 B2
6904971 Brothers et al. Jun 2005 B2
6949491 Cooke, Jr. Sep 2005 B2
6959767 Horton et al. Nov 2005 B2
6978838 Parlar et al. Dec 2005 B2
6981552 Reddy et al. Jan 2006 B2
6983798 Todd Jan 2006 B2
6987083 Phillippi et al. Jan 2006 B2
6997259 Nguyen Feb 2006 B2
7021377 Todd et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032663 Nguyen Apr 2006 B2
7033976 Guzman Apr 2006 B2
7036586 Roddy et al. May 2006 B2
7036587 Munoz, Jr. et al. May 2006 B2
7044220 Nguyen et al. May 2006 B2
7044224 Nguyen May 2006 B2
7063151 Nguyen et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066258 Justus et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069994 Cooke, Jr. Jul 2006 B2
7080688 Todd et al. Jul 2006 B2
7093664 Todd et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096947 Todd et al. Aug 2006 B2
7131491 Blauch et al. Nov 2006 B2
7140438 Frost et al. Nov 2006 B2
7151077 Prud'homme et al. Dec 2006 B2
7156174 Roddy et al. Jan 2007 B2
7165617 Lord et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168489 Frost et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172022 Reddy et al. Feb 2007 B2
7178596 Blauch et al. Feb 2007 B2
7195068 Todd Mar 2007 B2
7204312 Roddy et al. Apr 2007 B2
7219731 Sullivan May 2007 B2
7228904 Todd et al. Jun 2007 B2
7261156 Nguyen et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264051 Nguyen et al. Sep 2007 B2
7267170 Mang et al. Sep 2007 B2
7299876 Lord et al. Nov 2007 B2
7306037 Nguyen et al. Dec 2007 B2
7353876 Savery et al. Apr 2008 B2
7353879 Todd et al. Apr 2008 B2
7413017 Nguyen et al. Aug 2008 B2
7448450 Luke et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455112 Moorehead et al. Nov 2008 B2
7461697 Todd et al. Dec 2008 B2
7475728 Pauls et al. Jan 2009 B2
7484564 Welton et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497258 Savery et al. Mar 2009 B2
7497278 Schriener et al. Mar 2009 B2
7506689 Surjaatmadja et al. Mar 2009 B2
7547665 Welton et al. Jun 2009 B2
7553800 Munoz, Jr. Jun 2009 B2
7595280 Welton et al. Sep 2009 B2
7598208 Todd Oct 2009 B2
7608566 Saini et al. Oct 2009 B2
7608567 Saini Oct 2009 B2
7648946 Munoz, Jr. Jan 2010 B2
20010016562 Muir et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020036088 Todd Mar 2002 A1
20020119169 Angel et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125012 Dawson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030054962 England et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060374 Cooke, Jr. Mar 2003 A1
20030114314 Ballard et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130133 Vallmer Jul 2003 A1
20030147965 Bassett et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030188766 Banerjee et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030230407 Vijn et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030234103 Lee et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040014606 Parlar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014607 Sinclair et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040706 Hossaini et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055747 Lee Mar 2004 A1
20040070093 Mathiowitz et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040094300 Sullivan et al. May 2004 A1
20040099416 Vijn et al. May 2004 A1
20040106525 Willbert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138068 Rimmer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152601 Still et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040152602 Boles Aug 2004 A1
20040162386 Altes et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040170836 Bond et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040214724 Todd et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216876 Lee Nov 2004 A1
20040231845 Cooke, Jr. Nov 2004 A1
20040261993 Nguyen Dec 2004 A1
20040261995 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261996 Munoz, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261999 Nguyen Dec 2004 A1
20050006095 Justus et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028976 Nguyen Feb 2005 A1
20050034861 Saini et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050034865 Todd et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050059556 Munoz, Jr. et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059557 Todd et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059558 Blauch et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050103496 Todd et al. May 2005 A1
20050126785 Todd Jun 2005 A1
20050130848 Todd et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050183741 Surjaatmadja et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050205266 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050252659 Sullivan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272613 Cooke, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
20050277554 Blauch et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060016596 Pauls et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060032633 Nguyen Feb 2006 A1
20060046938 Harris et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060048938 Kalman Mar 2006 A1
20060065397 Nguyen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060105917 Munoz, Jr. May 2006 A1
20060105918 Munoz, Jr. et al. May 2006 A1
20060169182 Todd et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060169448 Savery et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060169450 Mang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060169452 Savery et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060169453 Savery et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172893 Todd et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172894 Mang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060172895 Mang et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060185847 Saini et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060185848 Surjaatmadja et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060205608 Todd Sep 2006 A1
20060243449 Welton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060247135 Welton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060254774 Saini et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258543 Saini Nov 2006 A1
20060258544 Saini Nov 2006 A1
20060276345 Todd et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060283597 Schriener et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070042912 Welton et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049501 Saini et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066492 Funkhouser et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070066493 Funkhouser et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078063 Munoz, Jr. Apr 2007 A1
20070078064 Munoz et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070235190 Lord et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238623 Saini et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070281868 Pauls et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080026955 Munoz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080026959 Munoz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080026960 Munoz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027157 Munoz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080070810 Mang Mar 2008 A1
20080139415 Todd et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080169102 Carbajal et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090062157 Munoz et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090258798 Munoz Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
0 510 762 Apr 1992 EP
0 879 935 Nov 1998 EP
0 879 935 Oct 1999 EP
1 413 710 Apr 2004 EP
2004181820 Jul 2004 JP
WO 9315127 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9315127 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9407949 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9407949 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408078 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408078 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408090 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408090 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9509879 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9509879 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9711845 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9711845 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9927229 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0057022 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0102698 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0187797 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0194744 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0255843 Jan 2002 WO
WO 0212674 Feb 2002 WO
WO 03027431 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03027431 Apr 2003 WO
WO 2004007905 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004037946 May 2004 WO
WO 2004038176 May 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050059557 A1 Mar 2005 US