1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to estimating error in a WLAN-based positioning system and, more specifically, to determining the expected error of an estimated position of a WLAN-enabled mobile device using WLAN-based positioning system.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Estimation is the process of finding the most probable value for a target parameter(s) based on a set of observable samples, which are correlated with the target parameter(s). Accuracy of the estimation can vary based on the quality of the observed samples. Quantifying the quality of estimation is one of the main subjects in estimation theory, and in most of the cases, it is an even harder problem than estimating the target parameter. A satellite based positioning system is one of the early systems that was introduced for global positioning, and for the same reason it is called Global Positioning System (GPS). In the GPS network, accuracy of estimation is also determined and reported to end users. The estimation error in the GPS network is presented in different ways. The error estimation is determined by considering the entire network, and it is called Delusion Of Precision (DOP) for horizontal and vertical error. The DOP value is an indicator of error, and it can be translated to error in meters as well.
Metro wide WLAN-based positioning systems have been explored by a couple of research labs, but none of them provided an expected error of position estimation. The most important research efforts in this area have been conducted by PlaceLab (a project sponsored by Microsoft and Intel), University of California San Diego ActiveCampus project (ActiveCampus—Sustaining Educational Communities through Mobile Technology, technical report #CS2002-0714), and the MIT campus wide location system.
There have been a number of commercial offerings of WLAN location systems targeted at indoor positioning. (See, e.g., Kavitha Muthukrishnan, Maria Lijding, Paul Havinga, Towards Smart Surroundings: Enabling Techniques and Technologies for Localization, Proceedings of the International Workshop an Location and Context-Awareness (LoCA 2005) at Pervasive 2005, May 2005, and Hazas, M., Scott, J., Krumm, J.: Location-Aware Computing Comes of Age, IEEE Computer, 37(2):95-97, February 2004 005, Pa005, Pages 350-362.) These systems are designed to address asset and people tracking within a controlled environment like a corporate campus, a hospital facility or a shipping yard. The classic example is having a system that can monitor the exact location of the crash cart within the hospital so that when there is a cardiac arrest the hospital staff doesn't waste time locating the device. The accuracy requirements for these use cases are very demanding, typically calling for 1-3 meter accuracy. These systems use a variety of techniques to fine tune their accuracy including conducting detailed site surveys of every square foot of the campus to measure radio signal propagation. They also require a constant network connection so that the access point and the client radio can exchange synchronization information similar to how A-GPS works. While these systems are becoming more reliable for indoor use cases, they are ineffective in any wide-area deployment. It is impossible to conduct the kind of detailed site survey required across an entire city and there is no way to rely on a constant communication channel with 802.11 access points across an entire metropolitan area to the extent required by these systems. Most importantly, outdoor radio propagation is fundamentally different than indoor radio propagation, rendering these indoor positioning techniques almost useless in a wide-area scenario.
There are millions of commercial and private WLANs deployed so far and this number is growing everyday. Thus, WLAN access points are used to estimate the location of WLAN-enabled mobile devices.
In one aspect, the invention features a method of estimating an expected error of a position estimate for use in a WLAN positioning system that estimates the position of a WLAN-enabled device. The WLAN-enabled device receives signals transmitted by a WLAN access point in range of the WLAN-enabled device. The method estimates the position of the WLAN-enabled device based on the received signals from the WLAN access point in range of the WLAN enabled device. The method also estimates an expected error of the position estimate based on characteristics of the WLAN access point in range of the WLAN enabled device, wherein the expected error predicts a relative accuracy of the position estimate.
In another aspect of the invention, the position estimate of the WLAN-enabled device is based on signals from more than one WLAN access point in range of the WLAN-enabled device. In a further aspect, the expected error of the position estimate is based on characteristics from more than one WLAN access point in range of the WLAN-enabled device.
In yet another aspect, the expected error of the position estimate is based on the number of access points used to estimate the position of the WLAN enabled device.
In another aspect of the invention, each of the WLAN access points has an associated signal coverage area. The expected error of the position estimate is based on at least one of the signal coverage areas of the WLAN access points used to estimate the position of the WLAN-enabled device.
In a further aspect of the invention, the expected error of the position estimate is based on the smallest signal coverage area of the WLAN access points used to estimate the position of the WLAN-enabled device.
In yet a further aspect of the invention, the coverage area for each WLAN access point is estimated by determining geographic locations at which a WLAN-enabled device receives a signal from the WLAN access point, determining the standard deviation of the coverage area based on the determined geographic locations, and estimating the coverage area of the WLAN access point based on the standard deviation of the coverage area.
In one aspect of the invention, each of the WLAN access points has a geographic position, and the expected error of the position estimate is based on the spatial spread of the geographic positions of the access points used to estimate the position of the WLAN-enabled device. The spatial spread is based on a distance between the geographic positions of the WLAN access points used to estimate the position of the WLAN-enabled device.
In another aspect of the invention, a position estimate is used in conjunction with other position estimates to derive at least one of position, speed, and direction of travel of the WLAN-enabled device and the weight given to the position estimate is based on the expected error of the position estimate. In one aspect, the position estimate is used only if the expected error of the position estimate is lower than a predetermined threshold. In a further aspect, at least one of the other position estimates is based on received signals from WLAN access points in range of the WLAN enabled device. In other aspects, at least one of the other position estimates is provided by a GPS-based positioning system.
In yet a further aspect, the invention features a system for estimating an expected error of a position estimate for use in a WLAN positioning system that estimates the position of a WLAN-enabled device. The system includes: a WLAN-enabled device for receiving signals transmitted by a WLAN access point in range of the WLAN-enabled device, position estimating logic for estimating the position of the WLAN-enabled device based on the received signals from the WLAN access point in range of the WLAN enabled device, and error estimating logic for estimating an expected error of the position estimate based on characteristics of the WLAN access points in range of the WLAN enabled device, wherein the expected error predicts a relative accuracy of the position estimate.
In the drawings,
Preferred embodiments of the invention estimate the error associated with a derived position provided by a WLAN positioning system. The incorporated patent applications describe a WLAN-based positioning system that can derive and provide estimated positions for WLAN-enabled devices.
Preferred embodiments of the invention determine and update the expected error of position estimates of a WLAN-based positioning system that use public and private WLAN access points. (Note that 802.11, 802.11b, 802.11e, 802.11n, and WiFi are examples of WLAN standards.) The user's mobile device periodically scans and detects public and private WLAN access points and also logs signals characteristics of each of the WLAN access points, for example, Received Signal Strength (RSS), Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), or Time difference of Arrival (TOA) corresponding to each of the WLAN access points. In some embodiments, the mobile device itself determines the expected error of a position estimate. In other embodiments, the mobile device sends the results of scanning the surrounding WLAN access points to a central site where a central server determines the expected error.
The expected error of a WLAN position estimate may be used to quantify the quality of the position estimate. This may be useful when multiple position estimates are combined or when the WLAN-based position estimates are combined with other position estimation techniques, e.g., GPS position estimation. The expected error of each position estimate may be used as a weighting factor when a series of position estimates are combined. For example, in order to increase the accuracy of single position estimate, multiple position estimates may be a weighted average. In this case, the expect error of each position estimate is used as a weight in a weighted average calculation.
In addition, a series of position estimates may be combined to derive the mobile device's speed of travel or bearing. When such a series of position estimates are combined, the expected error of each estimate is used as a corresponding quality metric of the estimation, which enables the optimal combination of the series of position estimates based on their quality.
For example, in a series of ten position estimates, assume all but the seventh position estimate have a relatively low expected error of position estimation, while the seventh position estimate has a relatively high expected error. When the mobile device uses this series of position estimates to derive the speed of the mobile device, the mobile device may exclude the seventh position estimate in the speed determination because its relatively high expected error value indicates that that particular position estimate is of low quality and, thus, may be unreliable.
The expected error of a position estimates may also be used to determine the expected error after combining the position estimate results. For example, if the position estimate results are used to determine speed of travel, the expected errors of individual position estimates are combined to determine the estimation error of the speed of travel.
Certain embodiments of the invention build on techniques, systems and methods disclosed in earlier filed applications, including but not limited to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/261,848, entitled Location Beacon Database, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/261,898, entitled Server for Updating Location Beacon Database, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/261,987, entitled Method and System for Building a Location Beacon Database, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/261,988, entitled Location-Based Services that Choose Location Algorithms Based on Number of Detected Access Points Within Range of User Device, all filed on Oct. 28, 2005, and also including but not limited to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,224, entitled Calculation of Quality of WLAN Access Point Characterization for Use in a WLAN Positioning System, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,222, entitled Estimation of Position Using WLAN Access Point Radio Propagation Characteristics in a WLAN Positioning System, both filed on May 8, 2006, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. Those applications taught specific ways to gather high quality location data for WLAN access points so that such data may be used in location based services to determine the geographic position of a WLAN-enabled device utilizing such services and techniques of using
said location data to estimate the position of a system user. The present techniques, however, are not limited to systems and methods disclosed in the incorporated patent applications. Thus, while reference to such systems and applications may be helpful, it is not believed necessary to understand the present embodiments or inventions.
Preferred embodiments of the invention may be used in a WLAN-enabled device to determine and update expected error of position estimates. For example, techniques in accordance with embodiments of the invention may be incorporated in logic embedded in positioning software [103] of the WLAN-enabled device of
Under one embodiment of the invention, the expected error of a position estimate of a WLAN-enabled mobile device is estimated based on the coverage area of all of the access points used to locate the WLAN-enabled mobile device. In other words, if all the detected access points are considered, the signal foot prints (or the coverage areas) of the detected access points are used to determine the expected error of the position estimate. In one illustrative implementation, the expected error of the position estimate is bounded by the smallest coverage area of the access points that are used to estimate the location of a WLAN-enabled mobile device. Therefore, the method is based on finding the smallest coverage area among the access points that are used to estimate the location of an end user in a WLAN-based positioning system. The expected error is directly correlated with the smallest coverage of detected WLAN access points. If the expected error is denoted by e, and the smallest coverage is denoted by Cmin, the error can be written as a function of the smallest coverage as follows:
e∝f(Cmin)|
The notation ∝ means direct dependency. One example of the function is as follows:
e=KcCmin|
The parameter Kc is a constant number to scale the value of smallest coverage area to the actual error in meters. The parameter Kc translates the minimum coverage in m2 to error in meters. The parameter Kc is found empirically by considering enough samples in the entire coverage area and finding the actual error and the Cmin value. The actual error can be determined by comparing the estimated position provided by the WLAN positioning system with a known position.
The coverage area or the footprint of a WLAN access point is defined as the area in which a WLAN-enabled mobile device can detect the particular access point. The coverage area of an access point is found by systematically scanning a target geographical area containing many access points and recording Received Signal Strength (RSS) samples at known locations. When all the samples of a given access point are considered, the standard deviation of the location of the RSS samples is used as an indicator of the size of the coverage area of the access point. In some embodiments, all RSS samples are considered. In other implementations, some RSS samples are ignored if the RSS is below a given threshold. If the total number of RSS samples of an access point is denoted by M and the corresponding location of RSS sample i is denoted by (xi, yi), the standard deviation, a, of coverage area is calculated as follows:
σ=√{square root over (σx2+σy2)},
in which σx and σy are the standard deviation of xi and yi over all M samples, respectively.
The access points [202a-d] in range have different coverage sizes [203a-d]. The estimation error is bounded by the minimum coverage [204] of the detected access points [202a-d]. For example, if the radius of the coverage area [203a] of the access point [202a] is 100 meters, the maximum estimation error corresponding to the position of user [201] is 100 meters.
Under other embodiments of the invention, the expected error of a position estimation is estimated based on how the detected access points are spatially spread, i.e., the distance between the geographic location of the detected access points. An example of the impact of the spatial spread of the detected access points on the position estimation error is illustrated in
σs=√{square root over (σxy2+σxy2)}
The expected error directly correlates with the standard deviation of spatial spread. So,
e∝f(σy).
An example of the above function is as follows:
e=Kxσx2
The parameter Ks is a constant number to scale the output value to error in meters. The parameter Ks translates the square of the standard deviation in m2 to error in meters. The parameter Kc is found empirically by considering enough samples in the entire coverage area and finding the actual error and the standard deviation square value. Error in meters is calculated by using the technique described above.
Under other embodiments of the invention, the expected error of a WLAN-enabled mobile device in a WLAN positioning system is estimated based on the number of access points that are detected. As illustrated in
An example of the above function is as follows:
The parameter KN is a constant number to scale the output of the equation to error in meters. In terms of units, the parameter KN is in meters. The parameter KN is found empirically by considering enough samples in the entire coverage area and finding the actual error and the N value. Error in meters is calculated by using the technique described above.
Under other embodiments of the invention, the expected error of a WLAN-enabled mobile device in a WLAN positioning system is estimated based on combining multiple correlated parameters with error. The three parameters correlated with the expected error of a position estimate are as follows: (1) the smallest coverage of detected access points, Cmin, (2) one over square root of number of detected access points, 1/√N, (3) square of spatial spread of detected access points, σs2.
The above parameters are correlated with the expected error, but in terms of the absolute value they have different dynamic ranges. In order to be able to combine them, their absolute values have to be normalized first. Normalization of the parameters is achieved by dividing them by the standard deviation of their dynamic range. The dynamic range is the largest and smallest absolute values of all of the access points in a given coverage area.
The normalized parameters can be simply averaged or they can be weighted according to the accuracy with which each parameter predicts the expected error and then averaged, which is called the weighted average. Weighting each component of error according to its accuracy of error prediction is more desirable and it is the optimum combining method. The next step in the weighted average approach is defining a metric for each of the parameters that measures the accuracy of the error prediction.
The correlation of each parameter with the error measures the accuracy of the error prediction of the particular error estimation method. These correlation coefficients are used to weight each method in the weighted average calculation. A correlation coefficient is a statistical parameter, and it is determined globally for each parameter based on a sufficient number of samples for the targeted geographic area by finding the actual error of a position estimate and also finding the estimated value of the parameter and then determining the correlation coefficient. Therefore, the correlation coefficient shows the statistical correlation of an estimation parameter with estimation error, and it does not show exactly the quality of one sample of the parameter. For example, one instance of a position determination might have a very small estimation error, but the smallest coverage area of the detected access points might be relatively large. In this example, the smallest coverage area of the detected access points is not a good indicator of the error, but it is still weighted with the same correlation coefficient as other samples. Therefore, the expected error using weighted average of the error parameters is written as follows:
In the above equation, the standard deviation operator is shown with σ and the correlation coefficients for Cmin, N, and σs are shown with Cc, CN, and Cs, respectively. The correlation coefficients are unitless. The correlation coefficients are found empirically by considering enough samples in the entire coverage area and comparing the expected error with the actual error for each sample.
Under other embodiments of the invention, the expected error of a position estimate is found in meters from a parameter that is correlated with the expected error. Assuming that there is a parameter correlated with the expected error, the estimation error in meters is found by mapping the distribution of the error parameter into the actual distance error in meters as found during scanning the targeted geographic area. Therefore, if error in meters is denoted by de, it is found as the result of the mapping and can be calculated as follows:
Note that the average value of a random process is shown with a bar on the variable and the standard deviation operator is shown with σ. The average and the standard deviation of de and e are found empirically by considering the 1 distribution of these parameters over samples that are collected from the entire coverage area. An example of the standard deviation and the average value of the parameters are as follows:
Note that the standard deviation of spatial spread of detected access points is determined based on the latitude and longitude of access points.
An example of the correlation coefficients is as follows:
0.30≦Cc,CN,Cx≦0.37
It will be appreciated that the scope of the present invention is not limited to the above described embodiments, but rather is defined by the appended claims; and that these claims will encompass modifications of and improvements to what has been described.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/206,028, entitled System and Method For Estimating Positioning Error Within A WLAN-Based Positioning System, filed Aug. 9, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/966,001, entitled System and Method For Estimating Positioning Error Within A WLAN-Based Positioning System, filed Dec. 13, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,019,357, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/625,450, entitled System and Method For Estimating Positioning Error Within A WLAN-Based Positioning System, filed Jan. 22, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,856,234, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/864,716, filed on Nov. 7, 2006, entitled Estimating Positioning Error for a WLAN Based Positioning System, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. This application is related to the following U.S. patent applications, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/261,987, entitled Method and System for Building a Location Beacon Database, filed on Oct. 28, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,403,762;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,079, Estimation Of Speed and Direction of Travel In A WLAN Positioning System, filed on May 8, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,835,754;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,064, Estimation of Speed and Direction of Travel In A WLAN Positioning System Using Multiple Position Estimations, filed on May 8, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,551,929;U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,222, Estimation of Position Using WLAN Access Point Radio Propagation Characteristics In a WLAN Positioning System, filed on May 8, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,578; andU.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/430,224, Calculation of Quality of WLAN Access Point Characterization for Use In a WLAN Positioning System, filed on May 8, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,551,579.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4991176 | Dahbura et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
6052598 | Rudrapatna | Apr 2000 | A |
6184829 | Stilp | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249252 | Dupray | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272405 | Kubota | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6317604 | Kovach, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6377209 | Krasner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414635 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420999 | Vavanos | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421330 | Chunq et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6463290 | Stilp et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473038 | Patwari et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6674403 | Gray et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678611 | Khavakh | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684250 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725158 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748324 | Patwari et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6799047 | Bahl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801778 | Korrapaty et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816111 | Krasner | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845239 | Sato | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853847 | Shioda et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6873290 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888811 | Eaton | May 2005 | B2 |
6915128 | Oh | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6919842 | Cho | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6934626 | Tingly | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6968194 | Aljadeff et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978023 | Dacosta | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995708 | Schmidt | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7002943 | Bhagwat et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7019753 | Rappaport et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7053830 | Krumm et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7092943 | Roese et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110779 | Billhartz et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7116988 | Dietrich et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123928 | Moeglein | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130646 | Wang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133909 | Bahl | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138946 | Tamaki et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139225 | Farmer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167715 | Stanforth | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7167716 | Kim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171217 | Beuck | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187925 | Abishek et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206294 | Garahi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212828 | Hind et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7212830 | Tamaki et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7236799 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250907 | Krumm et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257411 | Gwen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271765 | Stilp et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295556 | Roese et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305245 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308276 | Goren et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313402 | Rahman | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313403 | Gong et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315281 | Dejanovic et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323991 | Eckert et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330726 | Vare et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359718 | Tao et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397424 | Houri | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400598 | Humphries et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7403762 | Morgan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412246 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7414988 | Jones et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417971 | Jeong et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433673 | Everson et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7433694 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7433696 | Dietrich et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437444 | Houri | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466986 | Halcrow et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471954 | Brachet et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474646 | Tamaki | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7474897 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7493127 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502620 | Moman et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503489 | Heffez et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509131 | Krumm et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511662 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515578 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519470 | Brasche et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522049 | Aljadeff et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7525484 | Dupray et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7551579 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551929 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7576694 | Anjum et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7603128 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7603710 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620404 | Chesnais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623871 | Sheynblat | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634266 | McDougall et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647055 | Gum et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7685279 | Miltonberger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706356 | Olshansky et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706975 | Farmer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7751828 | Kim et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7751829 | Masuoka et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764231 | Karr et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7768963 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769396 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818017 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835754 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853250 | Harvey et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856234 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7899006 | Boyd | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916661 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8026847 | Pon | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032156 | Khushu | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8060389 | Johnson | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077084 | Syrjarinne et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8099104 | Loushine | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8260322 | Allen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8289206 | Wigren et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8364148 | Dravida et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364746 | Annamalai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8909245 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010030625 | Doles et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020108371 | Rouse et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030054830 | Williams et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030118015 | Gunnarsson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125045 | Riley et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030188016 | Agarwalla et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218570 | Moore et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220116 | Sagefalk et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225893 | Roese et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019679 | E et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039520 | Khavakh et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049570 | Frank et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057408 | Gray | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040081133 | Smavatkul et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087317 | Caci | May 2004 | A1 |
20040166864 | Hill et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040203420 | Rick et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203880 | Riley | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203904 | Gwon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203910 | Hind et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203926 | Ruutu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205234 | Barrack et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040248589 | Gwon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003827 | Whelan | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020266 | Backes et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050037775 | Moeolein et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050073980 | Thomson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085257 | Laird et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090268 | Yamasaki et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050107953 | Sugla | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108306 | Martizano Catalasan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050181804 | Misikangas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186967 | Ozluturk | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192024 | Shevnblat | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208919 | Walker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215201 | Cao et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246334 | Tao et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050270236 | Krumm et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009235 | Shevnblat et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025153 | Inaba | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046709 | Krumm et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072502 | Crandall et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078122 | Dacosta | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089157 | Casey et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095348 | Jones et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095349 | Morqan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106850 | Morqan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060170591 | Houri | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197704 | Luzzatto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200843 | Moroan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217131 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221918 | Wang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227739 | Mahany et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229088 | Walter | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240840 | Morqan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240846 | Bhattacharaya et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271517 | Deloach, Jr. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002813 | Tenny et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070004428 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018891 | Golden et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070077968 | Kuzminskiy | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097511 | Das et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121560 | Edge | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126635 | Houri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070139269 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150516 | MorQan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167174 | Halcrow et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070202888 | Brachet et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210938 | Duerwaarder et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070232892 | Hirota | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249366 | Thomson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258408 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258409 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258420 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258421 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259624 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280152 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280182 | Wisherd et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080008117 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008118 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008119 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008120 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008121 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033646 | Moman et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039115 | Hauzli et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080108319 | Gallacher | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108371 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132170 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133762 | Edge et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139217 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080176583 | Brachet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080227465 | Wachter et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242305 | Kahlert et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248741 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248808 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090011779 | MacNaughtan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090075672 | Jones et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090149197 | Moman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154371 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175189 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213828 | Brundage et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252138 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090303112 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303113 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303114 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303115 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303119 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303120 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090303121 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310585 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312035 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312036 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100052983 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110012780 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012784 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021207 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035420 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110045840 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058495 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074626 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080317 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110080318 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110080841 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110164522 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110235532 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235623 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110298659 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298660 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298663 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298664 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306357 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306358 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306359 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306360 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306361 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120007775 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120115508 | Moeglein | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1612999 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1655619 | May 2006 | EP |
1850606 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2427004 | Mar 2012 | EP |
09-074585 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2002-057614 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003-329757 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-112482 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005-528620 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-536110 | Nov 2005 | JP |
WO-0217567 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-03102620 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2004016032 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2004036240 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2005088991 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2005121829 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006070211 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006110181 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006117587 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007109880 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007133967 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007133968 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008057737 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2011011201 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Algorithms, “Eulerian Cycle/Chinese Postman,” http://www.2.toki.or.id/bookl—AlgDesignManual/BOOKIBOOK4/NODE165.HTM, Jun. 2, 1997, pp. 1-4. |
Bahl, Paramvir et. al., “Enhancing the Security of Corporate Wi-Fi Networks Using DAIR”, MobiSys '06, Jun. 19-22, 2006, p. 1-14. |
Blackwell, Gary, “Using WiFilCellular in P2P Positioning”, http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/news/article.php/3572001, Dec. 19, 2005, p. 1-4. |
Battiti, Roberto et. al., “Optimal Wireless Access Point Placement for Location-Dependent Services”, Dept. of Information & Comm. Tech., University of Trento, Technical Report # DIT-03-052, Oct. 2003, p. 1-14. |
Bowen III, et. al., “Combining Position Estimates to Enhance User Localization,” WPMC, Sep. 17-20, 2006, p. 1-5. |
Chan, et al., “Collaborative Localization: Enhancing WiFi-Based Position Estimation with Neighborhood Links in Clusters,” May 2006, 18 pages. |
Charibai, Youssef, “Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks”, Master's Degree Project, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005, p. 1-73. |
Ciurana, Marc et. al., “Indoor Tracking in WLAN Location with TOA Measurements,” MobiWAC '06, Torremolinos, Malaga, Spain, Oct. 2, 2006, p. 1-5. |
“Delta Encoding”, Wikipedia, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta—encoding, Mar. 2006, pp. 1-5. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP07783288, dated Jun. 3, 2010, 70 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. 11190959 dated Jan. 23, 2012, 2 pages. |
Ganu, Sachin et. al., “Infrastructure-based location estimation in WLAN networks” Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2004. vol. 1, Mar. 21-25, 2004, p. 1-6. |
Griswold et al., “ActiveCampus—Sustaining Educational Communities through Mobile Technology,” UCSD CSE Technical Report #CS200-0714, 2002, 19 pages. |
Hazas, M., et al., “Location-Aware Computing Comes of Age,” IEEE, vol. 37, Feb. 2004. |
Hellerbrandt, M., et al., “Estimating Position and Velocity of Mobile in a Cellular adio Network,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 46, No. 1, Feb. 1997. |
Hightower, et al., Particle Filters for Location Estimation in Ubiquitous Computing: A Case Study, Sep. 2004, 18 pages. |
“Huffman Coding”, Wikipedia, retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffman—coding, Mar. 2006, pp. 1-10. |
Ibach, Peter et. al., “WLAN-based Asset Tracking for Warehouse Management,” IADIS International Conference e-Commerce. Porto, Portugal, Dec. 15-17, 2005, p. 1-8. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, for International Application No. PCT/US2007/068248, mailing date of Aug. 6, 2008, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, for International Application No. PCT/US2007/068251, mailing date of Aug. 25, 2008, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, for International Application No. PCT/US2010/041279, mailing date of Sep. 1, 2010, 7 pages. |
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/39208, mailed Jan. 29, 2008, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, International Patent Application No. PCT/US07/81929, mailed Apr. 16, 2008, 2 pages. |
Izquierdo, F. et. al., “Performance evaluation of a TOA-based trilateration method to locate terminals in WLAN,” Internation Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing, Jan. 16-18, 2006, p. 1-6. |
Kaemarungsi, Kamol and Prashant Krishnamurthy, “Properties of Indoor Received Signal Strength for WLAN Location Fingerprinting”, Telecommunications Program, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 2004, pp. 1-10. |
Kawabata, K., “Estimating Velocity Using Diversity Reception,” IEEE, Mar. 1994, pp. 371-374. |
Kim, M., et al., “Risks of using AP locations discovered through war driving,”; Pervasive Computing; May 19, 2006; pp. 67-81. |
Kirsner, S., “One more way to find yourself,” The Boston Globe, May 23, 2005, Retrieved from www.boston.com. |
Krumm, J., et al., “LOCADIO: Inferring Motion and Location from Wi-Fi Signal Strengths,” First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, Aug. 2004. |
Kwan, M., “Graphic Programming Using Odd or Even Points,” Chinese Math. 1, 1962, pp. 273-277. |
Ladd, Andrew et. al., “Use Wireless Ethernet for Localization,” Ladd et. al., IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'02), Lausanne, Switzerland, Oct. 2002, p. 1-6. |
Lamarca, A., et al., “Place Lab: Device Positioning Using Radio Beacons in the Wild,”; Pervasive Computing; Oct. 2004; pp. 116-133, 18 pages. |
Lee, Youngseok et. al., “Optimization of AP Placement and Channel Assignment in Wireless LANS,” 27th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Nov. 2002, p. 1-6. |
Lenihan, Nicola, “A Local Optimal User Position System for Indoor Wireless Devices”, Master's Thesis, University of Limerick, May 2004, p. 1-192. |
Li, Binghao, Yufei Wang, Hyung Keun Lee, Andrew Dempster, and Chris Rizos, “A New Method for Yielding a Database of Location Fingerprints in WLAN”. Communications, IEE Proceedings, vol. 152, Issue 5, Oct. 2005, p. 1-26. |
Li, Binghao et. al., “Indoor Positioning Techniques Based on Wireless LAN,” First IEEE International Conference on Wireless Broadband and Ultra Wideband Communications, 2006, p. 1-7. |
McNally, et. al., “TRACER: In-vehicle, GPS-based, Wireless Technology for Traffic Surveillance and Management,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, Jul. 1, 2003, p. 1-81. |
Muthukrishnan, K., et al., “Towards Smart Surroundings: Enabling Techniques and Technologies for Localization,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3479, May 2005, 11 pages. |
Niculescu, D. et al., “Ad hoc positioning system (APS) Using AOA”, INFOCOM 2003, vol. 3, Mar. 30-Apr. 3, 2003, p. 1-10. |
Pahlavan, Kaveh et. al., “Indoor Geolocation Science and Technology”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 2002, p. 1-7. |
Pahlavan, Kaveh et. al., “Wideband Radio Propagation Modeling for Indoor Geolocation Applications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Apr. 1998, p. 1-6. |
Pavon, Javier et. al., “Link Adaptation Strategy for IEEE 802.1 WLAN via Received Signal Strength Measurement,” IEEE International Conference on Communications 2003. Anchorage, AK, May 11-15, 2003, p. 1-6. |
Prasithangaree, P., Krishnamurthy and P.K. Chrysanthis, “On Indoor Position Location with Wireless LANS”, Telecommunications Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, Sep. 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Priyantha, Nissanka et. al., “The Cricket Location-Support System”, 6th ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. Boston, MA , Aug. 2000, p. 1-12. |
Pyo, Jong-Sun, et. al., “Development of a map matching method using the multiple hypothesis technique,” Pyo et. al., 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Proceedings, Oakland CA, Aug. 2001, p. 1-5. |
Rahem et. al., “The Horus WLAN Location Determination System,” In Communications Networks & Distributed Systems Modeling & Simulation Conference, Jun. 2005, p. 1-14. |
Rao, Sanjay, “An Intelligent Home Using Wireless Location Networks and Real Time Messaging for Patients with Heart Failure,” MIT Thesis, Dec. 20, 2002, published on Jul. 30, 2003, p. 1-76. |
Rehim, “Horus.: A WLAN-Based Indoor Location Determination System”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, 2004, p. 1-127. |
Rerrer, Ulf, “Location-awareness for a Service-oriented Architecture Using WLAN Positioning”, Department of Computer Science, Paderborn University, Germany, 2005, pp. 1-6. |
Roos, Teemu et. al., “A Probabilistic Approach to WLAN User Location Estimation,” Intl. J. of Wireless Information Networks, vol. 9, No. 3, Jul. 2002, p. 1-10. |
“Seattle's PlaceLab,” www.dailywireless.org/2003110117/Seattles-placelab/, Oct. 17, 2003, p. 1-5. |
Shih, Johnny, “Wireless LAN Location System”, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Nov. 2003, p. 1-136. |
Singh, Reetu et. al., “Location Determination Using WLAN in Conjunction with GPS Networks” Vehicular Technology Conference—Spring 2004, vol. 5, May 2004, p. 1-5. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against Google, Inc., filed by Skyhook Wireless, Inc. (with Exhibits A-M) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Mar. 29, 2013, pp. 1-291. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Answering Brief in Opposition re Motion for Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) filed by Google Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Dec. 14, 2012, pp. 1-5. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Answering Brief in Opposition re: Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts filed by Skyhook Wireless Inc. and filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 9, 2012, pp. 1-25. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Answer to Complaint, with Jury Demand by Google Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 13, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Answer to Counterclaim by Skyhook Wireless, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on May 8, 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Complaint filed with Jury Demand against Google Inc.—Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf.—filed by Skyhook Wireless Inc. (with 11 Exhibits) filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012- cv-01177-RGA, on Sep. 20, 2012, pp. 1-196. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Declaration of Edward James Morgan re: Answering Brief in Opposition, by Skyhook Wireless Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 9, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Declaration of James A. Milkey re: Answering Brief in Opposition, by Skyhook Wireless Inc. (with Exhibits 1-11) filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 9, 2012, pp. 1-98. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Declaration of Sanjeet K. Dutta re: Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Google Inc. (with Exhibits A&B and Exhibits C-J) filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Oct. 18, 2012, pp. 1-233. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Defendant Google Inc.'s Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim against Skyhook Wireless, Inc. by Google, Inc. (with Exhibit A) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1-62. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Disclosures by Google, Inc. (with Exhibits A-B) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1-389. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Memorandum of Decision filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Mar. 6, 2014, pp. 1-30. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Motion for Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)—filed by Skyhook Wireless Inc. (with 2 Attachments) filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 30, 2012, pp. 1-9. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Google's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 2 (with Exhibit A) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Sep. 12, 2013, pp. 1-4. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed by Google Inc. and filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Oct. 18, 2012, pp. 1-3. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Opening Brief in Support re: Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed by Google Inc., and filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Oct. 18, 2012, pp. 1-15. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Order Granting Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed by Google Inc., Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on Jan. 15, 2013, filed by Google Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1 :2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Jan. 15, 2013, p. 1. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Preliminary Invalidity Disclosures by Google, Inc. (with Exhibits A-I) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Jun. 14, 2013, pp. 1-1629. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Preliminary Invalidity and Non-Infringement Contentions by Google, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Jun. 14, 2013, pp. 1-50. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Reply Brief re: Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts filed by Google Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 19, 2012, pp. 1-15. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent-Trademark Nos. U.S. Pat. No. 7,856,234; U.S. Pat. No. 8,019,357; U.S. Pat. No. 8,022,877; U.S. Pat. No. 8,154,454; U.S. Pat. No. 8,223,074; U.S. Pat. No. 8,242,960; U.S. Pat. No. 8,229,455; U.S. Pat. No. 8,054,219; U.S. Pat. No. 7,471,954 filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Sep. 20, 2012, pp. 1. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Response by Skyhook Wireless, Inc. to Sealed document Google's Opening Claim Construction Brief filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Sep. 16, 2013, pp. 1-34. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Second Amended Invalidity Disclosures for the Skyhook II Patents by Google, Inc. (with Exhibits A-G) filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Apr. 30, 2014, pp. 1-1235. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Summons Returned Executed by Skyhook Wireless Inc., Google Inc. served on Sep. 20, 2012 and filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Sep. 21, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Supplemental Declaration of Sanjeet K. Dutta re: Reply Brief, by Google Inc. (with Exhibits K-V) filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Nov. 19, 2012, pp. 1-141. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Sur-Reply Brief re Motion to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed by Skyhook Wireless Inc. filed by Google Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Delaware, Case No. 1:2012-cv-01177-RGA, on Dec. 28, 2012, pp. 1-4. |
Stoleru, Radu et. al., “Probability Grid: A Location Estimation Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2004 IEEE Comm. Society Conference, Oct. 4-7, 2004, p. 1-10. |
Supplementary European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP07761894, dated Jun. 3, 2010, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report and Written Opinion for EP07868513, dated Jun. 7, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Terminal Equipment and Protocols for Telematic Services: Information Technology—Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous-Tome Still Images—Requirements and Guidelines,” International Telecommunication Union, Sep. 1992, pp. 1-186. |
“UbiComp 2003”, Ubicomp.org,<http://www.ubicomp.org/ubicomp2003/>,2003, last visited Apr. 19, 2013, pp. 1-2. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/734,631, filed Nov. 7, 2005 by Stephen Edge for Location Solutions Applicable to Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs), pp. 1-11. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/748,225, filed Dec. 6, 2005 by Stephen Edge for Location Solution Applicable to a Terminal Served by a Wireless LAN, pp. 1-32. |
Vandenussche, Katelijne, “Fine-grained Indoor Localisation Using Wireless Sensor Networks”, Master's Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Aug. 2005, p. 1-64. |
“Written Opinion,” Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, Application No. 201108077-7, Application Filing Date: Oct. 19, 2007, Applicant: Skyhook Wireless, Inc., Date of Mailing: Aug. 16, 2013, pp. 1-14. |
“Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” International Application No. PCT/US05/39208, Jan. 29, 2008, pp. 1-3. |
Yu, Ke et. al., “WLAN-Based, Indoor Medical Residents Positioning System”, Wireless and Optical Communications Network 2005, Mar. 6-8, 2005, p. 1-5. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Judge Rya W. Zobel: Final Revised Claim Construction order entered in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Jan. 23, 2015, pp. 1-11. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Judge Rya W. Zobel: Memorandum of Decision entered denying Motion for Summary Judgment entered in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Feb. 18, 2015, pp. 1-50. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Judge Rya W. Zobel: Order entered in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Mar. 5, 2015, p. 1. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Memorandum in Support regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness of the '454, '074 and '960 Patents by Google, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Nov. 8, 2014, pp. 1-82. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness of the '454, '074 and '960 Patents by Google, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Nov. 7, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Opposition regarding Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness of the '454, '074 and '960 Patents by Skyhook Wireless Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Dec. 5, 2014, pp. 1-23. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Reply to Response to Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness of the '454, '074 and '960 Patents by Google, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Dec. 15, 2014, pp. 1-8. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Trial Brief by Google, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Mar. 2, 2015, pp. 1-14. |
Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Trial Brief Corrected by Skyhook Wireless, Inc. filed in the United States District Court of Massachusetts, Case No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ, on Mar. 2, 2015, pp. 1-25. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150087336 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60864716 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13206028 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 14558320 | US | |
Parent | 12966001 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13206028 | US | |
Parent | 11625450 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12966001 | US |