The present disclosure pertains to utility resources and particularly to assessment and distribution of the resources. More particularly, the disclosure pertains to beneficial management of resources and their loads.
The disclosure reveals a system for using attributes to deploy demand response resources. A service provider may provide energy to customers. The provider may via interactions modify consumption of the energy by the customers. Customers that participate in these interactions may be regarded as demand response resources. Interactions may incorporate demand response signals sent to the resources at their respective facilities. Each resource may have a demand response client which has an association with a customer account in a demand response management system of the provider. The association may be regarded as a binding of the demand response client. The binding may involve inputting an attribute of the demand response client, which can be correlated to the customer account. The attribute may be, for example, a location of the demand response client. Such attribute may be used for the association of the demand response client with a proper customer account.
The interactions between a service provider 18 and its DR resources 19 may entail the service provider 18 using a demand response management system (DRMS) 13 to send a message (referred to as a “DR signal”) to a DR resource 19 at a customer facility 14. The DR signal may be delivered using a communications channel 17 such as the Internet, paging, and so forth. In order for the DR resource 19 to receive the DR signal, the DR resource 19 should have some sort of equipment (referred to as DR client 12) installed that is capable of communicating with the service provider's DRMS 13 using the communications channel 17.
One of the costly issues in deploying a DR client 12 may be the time and effort involved with associating the DR client 12 with a particular customer account within the service provider's DRMS 13. This association may be referred to as “binding” the DR client 12. Binding the DR client 12 may be important because binding allows the service provider 18 to send DR signals to a DR resource 19 that are specific to that DR resource 19.
Binding may entail inputting some attribute of the DR client 12 into the DRMS 13 that would allow sent DR signals to be routed to the DR client 12. A key is to find a set of one or more attributes which can be easily correlated to a customer account in the DRMS 13 in order to reduce manual data entry and thus save costs for time and effort. The present approach may use, for example, location attributes of DR client 12 to create the binding. The approach, with respect to a binding issue, may allow an easy-to-generate attribute of the DR client 12 (e.g., its location) to be used to associate the DR client 12 with the proper customer account in the DRMS 13.
When a DR client 12 is deployed in the field, it is possible to use a device that determines global positioning system (GPS) coordinates of the DR client 12. These coordinates may then be easily input and stored into the DR client 12 device itself in an automated fashion without a need for a manual data entry. The DR client 12 may then contact the DRMS 13 and send its location information, in addition to other information, to its network communications address. Customer accounts in the DRMS 13 may have attributes, such as an address and so on, that allow their customer locations to be known. Thus, when a DR client 12 contacts the DRMS 13 with its location, it may be automatically correlated to an existing customer account.
It is recognized that there may be some ambiguity between GPS location determined by an installer 11 and a customer's account. Therefore, an alternative to the procedure indicated herein may be to allow an installation technician (installer) 11 resolve those ambiguities by confirming the binding at the customer's site 14. This may be accomplished by presenting alternatives to the installer 11 to choose from or perhaps to allow some sort of browser-based internet application to be used. While the use of these techniques may add an extra burden on the installer 11, they might only be needed in a limited number of cases and may also insure that the correct binding is over a more manual data entry process.
The system as shown in
It may noted that in support of a use case where there are some ambiguities between the location of the installer 11 and the customer's account, the installation device 15 may contain a customer database (DB) that would allow the installer 11 to select a customer account from a limited set of customer accounts to bind to the DR client 12. Thus, the binding may be performed at the customer site 14 as opposed to at the DRMS 13.
The approach may also incorporate binding 27 a demand response client. The demand response resource may incorporate the demand response client. The binding 27 the demand response client may permit the service provider to send demand response signals to the demand response resource which are specifically routed to that demand response resource.
The approach may also incorporate generating 28 a location of the customer facility from a device that determines geographical coordinates of the customer facility, and inputting 29 the location incorporating the geographical coordinates into the demand response client. The approach may additionally incorporate automatically correlating 30 the location to a customer at the demand response management system.
An application which is relevant to the present application is U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/019,943, filed Feb. 02, 2011, and entitled “A Demand Response Management System”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Provisional Patent Application No. 61/301,123, filed Feb. 03, 2010, and entitled “Demand Response Management System”. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/019,943, filed Feb. 02, 2011, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. Patent Provisional Patent Application No. 61/301,123, filed Feb. 03, 2010, hereby incorporated by reference.
An application which is relevant to the present application is U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,841, filed Jul. 12, 2010, and entitled “A System for Providing Demand Response Services”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/271,084, filed Jul. 17, 2009. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,841, filed Jul. 12, 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/271,084, filed Jul. 17, 2009, is hereby incorporated by reference.
An application which is relevant to the present application is U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/245,560, filed Oct. 03, 2008, and entitled “Critical Resource Notification System and Interface Device”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/977,909, filed Oct. 5, 2007. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/245,560, filed Oct. 03, 2008, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/977,909, filed Oct. 5, 2007, is hereby incorporated by reference.
In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.
Although the present system and/or approach has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/153,251, filed Jun. 3, 2011, entitled “A System for Using Attributes to Deploy Demand Response Resources”, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/019,943, filed Feb. 02, 2011, and entitled “Demand Response Management System”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/301,123, filed Feb. 03, 2010, and entitled “Demand Response Management System”. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/153,251, filed Jun. 3, 2011, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/019,943, filed Feb. 02, 2011, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/301,123, filed Feb. 03, 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference. This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/153,251, filed Jun. 3, 2011, entitled “A System for Using Attributes to Deploy Demand Response Resources”, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,841, filed Jul. 12, 2010, and entitled “A System for Providing Demand Response Services”, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/271,084, filed Jul. 17, 2009. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,841, filed Jul. 12, 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/271,084, filed Jul. 17, 2009, is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4110827 | Shavit | Aug 1978 | A |
4130874 | Pai | Dec 1978 | A |
4153936 | Schmitz et al. | May 1979 | A |
4419667 | Gurr et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4850010 | Stanbury et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4937760 | Beitel et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5341142 | Reis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5500561 | Wilhelm | Mar 1996 | A |
5566084 | Cmar | Oct 1996 | A |
5572438 | Ehlers et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598349 | Elliason et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5719854 | Choudhury et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5822553 | Gifford et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
6026375 | Hall et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6195367 | Jakobik et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209018 | Ben-shachar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6252950 | Duty et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259723 | Miyashita | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278717 | Arsenault et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289384 | Whipple et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6366926 | Pohlmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446136 | Pohlmann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529723 | Bentley | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535817 | Krishnamurti et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566926 | Patterson | May 2003 | B1 |
6574581 | Bohrer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6832249 | Ciscon et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6857022 | Scanlan | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865685 | Hammond et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6985087 | Soliman | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010700 | Foss et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016784 | Allen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039532 | Hunter | May 2006 | B2 |
7069309 | Dodrill et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7260616 | Cook | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7333880 | Brewster et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337237 | Salahshoor et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346467 | Bohrer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7392115 | Schindler | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401086 | Chorafakis et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7528503 | Rognli et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565227 | Richard et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7650289 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7676657 | Lindholm et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702424 | Cannon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742953 | King et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775191 | Hou | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778738 | Taft | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797009 | Kiiskila et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806845 | Arm et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845576 | Siddaramanna et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865252 | Clayton | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873441 | Synesiou et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885718 | Yano et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7886166 | Shnekendorf et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925384 | Huizenga | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941528 | Hicks, III et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954726 | Siddaramanna et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958229 | Conway | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8023410 | O'Neill | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8073558 | Koch et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091794 | Siddaramanna et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8140658 | Gelvin et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8143811 | Shloush et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8163276 | Hedrick et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170774 | Forte et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183995 | Wang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8199773 | Aubin et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8232745 | Chemel et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234017 | Ahn | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234876 | Parsonnet et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260468 | Ippolito et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8260469 | Gregory et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8260650 | Miller | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291243 | Castelli et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295989 | Rettger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305380 | Gotwalt et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8327024 | Pattison et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8330762 | Grossman | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352094 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373547 | Benya et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386086 | Roux et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8406937 | Verfuerth et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412654 | Montalvo | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8417391 | Rombouts et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8621097 | Venkatakrishnan et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8868925 | Wyatt et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030016237 | Hickey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033230 | McCall | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030216969 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233064 | Arm et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040034484 | Solomita, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047354 | Slater et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040137897 | Teixeira | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040203649 | Cashiola | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027636 | Gilbert et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050152694 | Chown | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050172304 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194456 | Tessier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229220 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050262026 | Watkins | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060047369 | Brewster et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060145838 | Alvarez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070005195 | Pasquale et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070055999 | Radom et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070222295 | Wareham et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080011864 | Tessier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046715 | Balazs et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080167931 | Gerstemeier et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177678 | Di Martini et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080262848 | Shienbrood et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090046625 | Diener et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062970 | Forbes et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090187499 | Mulder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198384 | Ahn | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204977 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090249089 | Tremel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249090 | Schmitz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271255 | Utter et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281674 | Taft | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295594 | Yoon | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090297488 | Fraser et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313083 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319090 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100057480 | Arfin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076615 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076835 | Silverman | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106342 | Ko et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106543 | Marti | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114340 | Huizenga et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138363 | Batterberry et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168924 | Tessier et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100239090 | Oran | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100262297 | Shloush et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274377 | Kaufman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281257 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283606 | Tsypin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324962 | Nesler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016200 | Koch | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040550 | Graber et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040666 | Crabtree et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046805 | Bedros et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093493 | Nair et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113068 | Ouyang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125542 | Koch | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172836 | Boss et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172838 | Pai et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196539 | Nair et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196546 | Muller et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199209 | Siddaramanna et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212700 | Petite | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231320 | Irving | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110301774 | Koch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120066397 | Koch et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066686 | Koch | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084696 | Marti | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120093141 | Imes et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101653 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109399 | Tran | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136915 | Koch et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120173030 | Taft | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197456 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197457 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197458 | Walter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120245968 | Beaulieu et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271473 | Koch | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277920 | Koch | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130035992 | Silverman | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130047010 | Massey et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130079931 | Wanchoo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140081704 | Strelec et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140149973 | Walter et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140278687 | McConky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2005033964 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2008027455 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008027457 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2009006133 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2009020606 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009023230 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009027617 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2009085610 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 2011065007 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2013025565 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013055551 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Autogrid, “Austin Energy and AutoGrid Systems Collaborate on Standards-Based Automated Demand Response to Usher in a New Era of Retail Choice for the Demand Response Market,” 5 pages, Feb. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/939,935, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,043, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,066, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/940,090, filed Jul. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/056,902, filed Oct. 17, 2013. |
Santacana et al., “Getting Smart, With a Clearer Vision of Intelligent Grid, Control Emerges from Chaos,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, pp. 41-48, Mar./Apr. 2010. |
“Smart Demand Response: A Discussion Paper,” Energy Networks Association, energyuk, 44 pages, prior to Nov. 29, 2012. |
Abdullah et al., “Demand-Side Energy Management Performed Using Direct Feedback via Mobile Systems: Enables Utilities to Deploy Consumer Based Demand Response Programs,” 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 172-177, 2010. |
European Search Report for Related Application No. EP 12169650.4, Dated Nov. 22, 2012. |
International Search Report for PCT ApplicationSerial No. pct/us2012/058537, International Filing Date Oct. 3, 2012. |
Coughlin et al., “Estimating Demand Response Load Impacts: Evaluation of Baseline Load Models for Non-Residential Buildings in California,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63728, 33 pages, Jan. 2008. |
Cruz, “Tutorial on GPU Computing with an Introduction to CUDA,” 37 pages, prior to Nov. 17, 2011. |
Holmberg, “Facility Interface to the Smart Grid,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, 7 pages, printed 2012. |
Honeywell, “Automated Demand Response—Southern California Program,” 2 pages, printed Aug. 1, 2011. |
Honeywell, “The Perfect Response to Peak Events,” 4 pages, Nov. 2010. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demand—response, “Demand Response,” 10 pages, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
http://www.naesb.org/pdf3/dsmee012308213.doc, “Demand Response Measurement and Verification Literature Review,” 29 pages, created Jan. 14, 2008, modified Dec. 18, 2012. |
https://buildingsolutions.honeywell.com/Cultures/en-US/Markets/Utilities/DemandResponse/, 1page, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
Hunt, “Automated Demand Response System and Advanced End-Use Services Platform,” Optimal Technologies, 31, pages, Sep. 24, 2004. |
Kiliccote et al., “Findings from Seven Years of Field Performance Data for Automated Demand Response in Commercial Buildings,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-3643E, May 2010. |
Kiliccote et al., “Open Automated Demand Response Communications in Demand Response for Wholesale Ancillary Services,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2945E, 13 pages, Nov. 2009. |
Kiliccote et al., “Open Automated Demand Response for Small Commercial Buildings,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2195E, 104 pages, Jul. 2009. |
Koch et al., “Architecture Concepts and Technical Issues for an Open, Interoperable Automated Demand Response Infrastructure,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63664, 7 pages, Oct. 2007. |
Koch et al., “Direct Versus Facility Centric Load Control for Automated Demand Response,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-2905E, 11 pages, Nov. 2009. |
Koch et al., “Scenarios for Consuming Standardized Automated Demand Response Signals,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-1362E, 10 pages, Nov. 2008. |
Koch, “The Demand Response Automation Server (DRAS),” Building Performance, http://www.akuacom.com/assets/pdf/ASHRAE—2008—Ed—Koch.pdf, 18 pages, prior to Nov. 17, 2011. |
Olson, “New Approaches in Automating and Optimizing Demand Response to Solve Peak Load Management Problems,” Building IQ brochure, 8 pages, 2011. |
Piette et al., “Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: 2006 Pilot Program Description and Results,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-62218, 67 pages, Aug. 2007. |
Piette et al., “Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: Program Description and Results,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-59351, Apr. 2006. |
Piette et al., “Design and Implementation of an Open, Interoperable Automated Demand Response Infrastructure,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-63665, 6 pages, Oct. 2007. |
Piette et al., “Findings From the 2004 Fully Automated Demand Response Tests in Large Facilities,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-58178, 197 pages, Sep. 2005. |
Piette et al., “Linking Continuous Energy Management and Open Automated Demand Response,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-1361E, 9 pages, Nov. 2008. |
Piette et al., “Open Automated Demand Response Communications Specification,” Version 1.0, CEC-500-2009-063, 214 pages, Apr. 2009. |
Piette et al., “Participation through Automation: Fully Automated Critical Peak Pricing in Commercial Buildings,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-60614, 14 pages, Aug. 13-18, 2006. |
Schisler et al., “The Role of Demand Response in Ancillary Services Markets,” IEEE, 3 pages, 2008. |
Violette et al., “DRR Valuation and Market Analysis vol. II: Assessing the DRR Benefits and Costs,” Summit Blue Consulting, 112 pages, Jan. 6, 2006. |
Watson et al., “Machine to Machine (M2M) Technology in Demand Responsive Commercial Buildings,” Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-55087, 18 pages, Aug. 2004. |
Yin et al., “Auto-DR and Pre-Cooling of Buildings at Tri-City Corporate Center,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Report No. LBNL-3348, 140 pages, Nov. 2008. |
Zaidi et al., “Load Recognition for Automated Demand Response in Microgrids,” IEEE, pp. 2436-2439, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/526,193, filed Oct. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/224,744, filed Mar. 25, 2014. |
“Executive Summary,” 1 page, prior to Sep. 2007. |
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), “Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering,” 92 pages, Sep. 2007. |
http://www.akuacom.com/solutions/index.html, “Akuacom—Automated Demand Response,” 2 pages, printed Feb. 3, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140047013 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61301123 | Feb 2010 | US | |
61271084 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13153251 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 14056894 | US | |
Parent | 13153251 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 14056894 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13019943 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13153251 | US | |
Parent | 14056894 | US | |
Child | 13153251 | US | |
Parent | 12834841 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13153251 | US |