Patent Application
20050282132
This invention pertains generally to the field of timing and pacing devices, and more specifically to a device for pacing an examinee through an examination, so that he or she (hereinafter “it”) is silently and unobtrusively reminded to monitor its progress throughout a standardized multiple choice test so as to complete the test on time and in a calm, consistent manner.
Education in developed countries has increasingly relied upon standardized testing as a way of defining and quantifying educational potential and achievement. Multiple choice testing has become the method of choice, providing a cost effective and efficient means to assess knowledge. Lives are molded by how students perform on tests such as the SAT, GRE and a rich variety of vocational exams, from civil service to professional exams such as legal or medical boards. Performance on standardized tests determines an individual's ability and opportunity to fulfill its dreams and provide for its families. Unfortunately, varying skill at test taking mechanics presents a confounder to assessing student ability.
Students in all walks of life have massive difficulty in pacing themselves while taking a test. Often they rush themselves, incorrectly overestimating how fast they should progress through the questions, making mistakes they would not have made if they had paced themselves better. Typically, they end the test with time remaining and then struggle to make changes which are generally unadvisable. Worse, other students underestimate their speed, being caught up in beginning questions only to find time has run out and they cannot finish the exam. This invention effectively stops these catastrophes.
In addition to the most common standardized tests and users, several specific situations offer particularly difficult testing challenges. This invention levels the field for persons who have the required knowledge and intelligence yet may have learning disabilities. Learning challenges such as Attention Deficit Disorder can make pacing particularly important, since consistent effort is especially difficult. For the deaf test taker, the device becomes especially useful, since the vibratory reminder becomes the best form of communication with the user. Advanced users, such as those facing a series of long essays over several hours in law school, for example, may easily lose track of the appropriate pace despite the relatively small number of questions they face. For this application, it is particularly practical to be able to, by pressing a single button, see how much time remains within a specific question's time interval in order to be on pace.
Various timing and countdown devices are well established in the prior art. There exist timing devices capable of signaling progressive elapses of countdown periods, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,451,158 (Selwyn et al). This discloses a countdown timer utilizing a voice synthesizer to announce the elapsed countdown. There exists dual function wristwatch and time calculating devices, such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,154 (Suga), which discloses a device which works as both a pulse frequency calculator and memory device for runners while running a given distance as well as a wristwatch. However, there is minimal prior art that is suitable as well as effective for use in the preeminent educational proving ground of our time, the standardized multiple choice test. Since most standardized tests have a plurality of questions of similar average difficulty and a predetermined amount of time allotted in which to answer them, successful examinees must pace themselves in order to appropriately spread their efforts during the test.
Two crucial aspects govern the success of a pacing device for standardized tests. Firstly and most obviously, the device must be permitted by the rules governing the taking of most standardized tests. Most standardized tests specifically prohibit the bringing of all personal belongings to a test, with the exception of identification, glasses, handicapped assistance devices and a wristwatch. Most standardized tests specifically prohibit the bringing of any calculating devices of any kind. Most standardized tests specifically prohibit the bringing of any device with noise making ability or audible alarms which are not shut off, so that other test takers sitting nearby are not disturbed.
The second critical aspect is that a test pacing device not just have the relatively simple computing ability to divide the time, but also the functional ability to prompt the user to use the device throughout the test. This is essential because examinations are tremendously stressful, for both children as well as adults. It is entirely impractical to rely on the already maximally stressed user to remember yet more things, namely to appropriately schedule checking their pacer watch. The users who need the device the most, whether they simply have trouble developing a consistent rhythm on a test or who have more significant difficulties such as Attention Deficit Disorder, are precisely the users who can least be relied upon to consistently check their pacer without prompting.
Pacing examinees during multiple choice tests has been addressed in the prior art by a number of U.S. Pat. Nos. , such as 5,140,564 (Rich, Aug. 18, 1992), 5,642,334 (Liberman, Jun. 24, 1997) and 5,796,681 (Aronzo, Aug. 18, 1998). However, these solutions entirely fail both of these two critical aspects that would allow for practical use during a standardized multiple choice examination.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,564 was granted to Rich and is currently expired. It described a square box to be used during a test for pacing. However, as an electronic item of personal property that is not a wristwatch, it would specifically be prohibited at most standardized multiple choice tests. Thus, this prior art would not even get through the door at an exam. Even if test proctors were inclined to bend the rules of an exam, their own common sense would tell them that advances in electronics and memory might allow a box with a plurality of switches and a display to be programmed with an enormous amount of information which might be useful and therefore might represent cheating on an exam.
Similarly prohibited, but of even more suspicious appearance, the dual finction of U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,334 (Liberman) is that of a pacing device and mechanical pencil. Its function necessitates an alphanumeric keyboard and display, allowing the possibility of enormous calculation and information storage capabilities. U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,681 (Aronzo) is a freestanding device that displays the examinee's question answering time, providing large statistical displays in most embodiments, large numbers of buttons in other embodiments, and in no embodiment having dual function as a wristwatch.
Of equal importance, the second critical issue of reminding the user to use the pacer during the test has not practically been solved until the device of the present invention. U.S. Pat. No. 5,1405,564 (Rich) provided users no reminder or alert for the user to remember, despite the stress of the exam, to use the device appropriately while taking the test. Users might either forget about the device completely, or until it was too late to repair their incorrect pace, or worse, might waste the precious time the device is supposed to help manage by continually checking the display.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,334 (Liberman) has flashing warning lights which, since light is free to travel about in an examination room, would be disturbing to adjacent test takers. Its efficiency at alerting the user would be similar to its efficiency at annoying nearby examinees. This might cause the device's confiscation, resulting in tremendous stress for the user, or worse, might cause the user to be disqualified on the grounds that personal electronic devices which are not wristwatches had been brought into the test. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,796,681 (Aronzo) describes the way to “. . . display a shortage of time is by flashing or changing color,” or with an audible signal. This likewise would not be allowed at a standardized exam.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,181 (Entner) describes a wearable alarm watch enabling a deaf person to enjoy the benefits of wearing an alarm watch. The device has no ability to input information useful in a test nor does it have any pacing ability of any kind. U.S. Pat. No. 5,878,004 (Miyauchi) further describes a wristwatch vibration alarm with a flat stator type bipolar stepping motor with a rotor of high durability which requires low power consumption. It does not describe any test taking usefulness.
Multi-mode electronic wrist watches are well-known in the art to perform functions in addition to basic timekeeping and date keeping, such as displaying alternate time zones, beeping alarm watches, and pace-setting for runners. These alternate capabilities, or modes, are selected by actuating manual switches on the watch in a prescribed sequence and observing the results on the watch display. Examples of multi-mode electronic wristwatches, all in the name of Tom Thinesen, are seen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,989,188 (temporarily viewing a mode other than the current mode), U.S. Pat. No. 5,050,141 (pacing a runner with periodic beeping sounds) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,257,244 (displaying instructional messages for mode navigation).
Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide a dual function wristwatch and test pacer that can be used to pace the examinee's progress and provide silent reminder alert points in standardized multiple choice tests or other types of timed examinations.
Another object of the invention is to provide a test pacing device with a vibration function that critically enhances the practical usefulness of the device by providing alert point reminders which in no way disturb others, yet are difficult for the user to accidentally ignore.
Another object of the invention is to provide an improved multi-mode wristwatch, particularly adapted as a test timing pacer and periodic reminder, but with no function, which might cause it to be barred from the examination room.
Briefly stated, the invention comprises an improvement in a multi-mode electronic timepiece especially adapted to assist a user to take a multiple question timed examination, the timepiece having an electrooptic display, a memory, a vibrator alarm device, several manually actuated actuators and a programmable integrated circuit programmed to keep time and to provide several timepiece operating modes including a test timer mode, the integrated circuit being further programmed to permit an operator to switch between modes in response to actuation of a selected actuator; the integrated circuit being further programmed to display information relating to the examination in response to actuation of a selected actuator; the integrated circuit being further programmed to display, to increment, to decrement, and to store displayed information in memory in response to actuation of a selected actuator, to perform calculations thereon and to display information and results of calculations on the display; the integrated circuit being further programmed to provide vibrations produced by said vibrator alarm device in response to information stored in memory.
The improvement of the present invention includes a test timer setting mode adapted to enable a user to select and store in memory 1) a selected examination time period, 2) a selected number of examination questions, and 3) a selected number of alert points, and a test timer mode adapted 1) to display time remaining in the examination and the question number corresponding to time remaining, and 2) to actuate said vibrator alarm device at each occurrence of an alert point. In a further improvement, a pre-selected message is displayed at pre-selected alert points after actuating the vibrator alarm device.
This invention, both as to organization and method of practice, together with further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to
Referring now to
Also shown in
Also shown in
Briefly, the different functional modes available in the watch are as follows:
Test timer mode is entered by pressing S3 (Mode/Select) from the normal time of day mode. Entry into test timer mode is signaled by the words “test mode” displayed in groups of segments 14 and 15. Pressing S2 (Set) or simply waiting approximately three seconds enters Test Timer Set mode. Pressing S4 (Light) will, as in most cases, throughout this description, illuminate the electroluminescent display.
This mode is used to set the exam parameters prior to beginning an exam. Initially the display shows (
After the examination time period has been thus input, the display shifts as shown in
The next parameters to be input are the time intervals to set the alert points at which a vibrating alarm will prompt the examinee to check the pace with which it is completing the exam. Thus, when the vibration occurs, the examinee will know to look at the device and compare the question number indicated on the lower display line with the question number that it is currently considering. By doing so, the examninee knows that if it has at least completed this question number it is on pace to complete the exam in the time allotted.
To commence the alert point setting sequence as shown in
Pressing S2 (Set) would provide the examinee with no additional vibration alerts other than the preset default vibration which occurs as a final alert point when ten minutes are remaining in the test. Note that if a test length of less than ten minutes is input, no vibration alert will occur.
The user may select a number of alert points at which the watch will vibrate to alert the examinee to check its progress. If instead of pressing S2 (Set) the user presses S1 (Advance) once, this changes the lower display line to indicate the fraction ½, represented by a 1, a backslash and a 2, followed by TME, representing the word “time” (
If instead of pressing S2 (Set), the user again presses S1 (Advance), the display line 15 changes to the fraction ¼, represented by a 1, a backslash and a 4. Pressing S2 (Set) provides the examinee with a vibration alert point at the completion of each quarter of the exam, in addition to the default alert which occurs when there are ten minutes remaining in the test.
In any of these cases in test timer signal mode, pressing S2 (Set) initiates the device to display the input test time and input number of questions. As example, this application will use a test length of one hour and forty five minutes, having 60 questions (
This mode is used during the test. After S1 (Advance) is pressed by the examinee when it is told to begin the test, the display reads “Good Luck.” (
If the test taker has selected “none” in the Test Timer Signal mode, the only vibration alert that he or she will receive will be the default one which occurs at ten minutes prior to the conclusion of the test. After this alert, as with all vibration alerts during Test Timer Run mode in the preferred embodiment, a relaxing or encouraging message (“Almost Done”) will be displayed for approximately three seconds (
If the test taker has selected “½” in the Test Timer Signal mode, in addition to the default vibration alert at ten minutes remaining, the test taker will receive an additional vibration alert when 1/2 of the exam time has elapsed. Thus, in the example above in the preferred embodiment, 52 minutes and 30 seconds after initiating the exam whose duration has been input as 1 hour 45 minutes (
Similarly, if the test taker has selected “¼” in the Test Timer Signal mode, the test taker will receive two additional vibration alerts. Thus, in total, they will receive vibration alerts at times corresponding to: 1) the time when ¼ of the exam allotted time has elapsed, 2) the time when 1/2 of the exam allotted times has elapsed, 3) the time when 3/4 of the exam allotted time has elapsed and 4) the default vibration alert at ten minutes remaining in the exam. In our example, these would occur in sequence after: 1) 26¼ minutes, 2) 52½ minutes, 3) 78¾ minutes, and 4) 1 hour and 35 minutes. The display sequences occurring at the half way point in the exam as well as with ten minutes remaining in the exam would occur identically to the last example, as if the test taker had selected “½” in the Test Timer Signal mode. The two additional alerts would occur with similar display sequences ending in new messages. When ¼ of the exam time allotted has elapsed, the displayed message sequence would be “Done ¼” for approximately three seconds followed by “Stay Sharp” for approximately three seconds (
At the finish of the input exam time, when the time remaining reaches zero, the display shows “Time is Up” (
The multimode electronic watch has the usual functions found in such a watch, such as a time-of-day mode and an alarm mode, as are well known in the prior art. Alarm mode is entered by successively pressing the mode/select switch S3 from the normal time of day mode as shown in
Other embodiments of the present invention would have additional choices for vibration alerts and messages. For example, rather than selecting the number of alert points and calculating the time intervals between alert points, the user would be able to set a time increment representing the time interval between successive vibration alerts and messages, such as every ten minutes, every five minutes or whatever number of minutes was selected until the completion of the exam. Another embodiment might create a pool of potential messages of encouragement and relaxation, which would be selected from at random by the device and displayed at whatever intervals are selected for vibration alert during the exam. Thus, in addition to the encouraging messages described above, additional messages might include: “Keep Calm,” “Stay Smooth,” “Shake Out,” “Keep Focus,” “You're Right,” “Stay Cool,” “Move Neck,” “Chill Out,” and “Stay Strong.” Another embodiment might have the ability for the examinee to select these messages to appear without an associated vibration alert, providing a calming influence without the vibration prompt. Other embodiments within the scope of the invention are pocket watch versions, necklace versions, as well as pager or keychain versions. All of these are carried on the person and capable of causing the examinee to feel the vibrator alarm device.
While there has been described what is considered to be the preferred embodiment of the invention, other modifications will occur to those skilled in the art, and it is desired to secure in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the true spirit, and the scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10360058 | Feb 2003 | US |
| Child | 11210981 | Aug 2005 | US |
