The use of mobile nodes to form ad-hoc communication networks provides an efficient and effective method of exchanging messages between mobile nodes as well as between a mobile node and stationary or fixed stations. For example, an ad-hoc communication network of mobile nodes can be used to relay messages to a fixed station from an originating mobile node that is beyond the communication range of the fixed station. In this example, the message is passed from one mobile node to the next mobile node that is in the direction of the fixed station until a mobile node is within the communication range of the destination station. The message is then passed onto the destination station. The use of ad-hoc communication networks eliminates the need to install and maintain significant numbers of fixed stations so that at least one will be within radio range of every mobile node traveling through a coverage area. While, the use of a mobile node-to-mobile node relay system (ad-hoc communication network) will serve many mobile nodes, it is impossible to guarantee that every mobile node will be equipped to set up the ad-hoc communication network or that there will be a sufficient number of mobile nodes positioned within the radio range of each mobile node so that a route can be found for the message from the originating mobile node seamlessly to the destination station.
For the reasons stated above and for other reasons stated below which will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the present specification, there is a need in the art for an efficient and cost effective way to fill in gaps in routing options in an ad-hoc network.
The above-mentioned problems of current systems are addressed by embodiments of the present invention and will be understood by reading and studying the following specification. The following summary is made by way of example and not by way of limitation. It is merely provided to aid the reader in understanding some of the aspects of the invention.
In one embodiment, a method of communicating mobile node messages is provided. The method comprises forming an at-hoc communication network of mobile nodes. Communicating messages between the mobile nodes via the at-hoc communication network using mobile node-to-mobile node communication signals and supplementing communication gaps in the ad-hoc communication network with alternative communication signals.
The present invention can be more easily understood and further advantages and uses thereof more readily apparent, when considered in view of the detailed description and the following figures in which:
In accordance with common practice, the various described features are not drawn to scale but are drawn to emphasize specific features relevant to the present invention. Reference characters denote like elements throughout Figures and text.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the inventions may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the claims and equivalents thereof.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method of filling gaps in service coverage for an ad-hoc communication network of mobile node network. Although, the below mobile node-to-mobile node communication networks are described in relation to aircrafts, the invention can apply to any type of ad-hoc mobile node-to-mobile node network. For example, such mobile-mobile node networks could include, but are not limited to, ground traversing military vehicles and even soldier radio networks. Hence the present invention is not limited to ad-hoc air-to-air communication networks. In one embodiment, communication satellites are used to fill in service coverage for an ad-hoc mobile node-to-mobile node communication network. In aeronautical communication embodiments, the individual strengths between the two communication systems are complementary to each other. Ad-hoc air-to-air communication networks work well where the aircraft are relatively densely spaced. Some communication satellite services, however, have a limitation that they cannot service a large number of aircraft in a small geographical region due to bandwidth limitations and/or are more expensive to use, which makes them less desirable for aeronautical communications. However, the strengths and limitations of both the air-to-air network and the communication satellite network align in such a way to make a very cost effective aeronautical communication network with world wide coverage in both dense and sparse airspace when compared to prior art solutions.
Referring to
In contrast to the passing of the message to the ground station 106 via the air-to-air network of aircraft 104 (1-N), the message generated by aircraft 102 needs help in reaching the ground station 106 because of a gap in the coverage. Since, aircraft 102 is not within the air-to-air communication range (or mobile node-to-mobile node communication range) of another aircraft in the direction of the ground station 106 or the ground station itself, an alternative means of communicating the message is used. In this example, once aircraft 102 discovers it cannot pass the message on to the destination node or another aircraft of an air-to-air communication network, it uses a satellite communication means to pass the message on to the destination node. Referring to
In this embodiment, messages that are determined to not be urgent are held on to until a later time. However, if a message is determined to be urgent it is sent right away by the alternative communication means (or system). In particular, in this embodiment, if the message is determined as being urgent (314), the message is sent via the alternative communication means (316). The message is then communicated to the destination via the alternative system (318). If the message is determined not to be urgent (314), it then determines if a maximum wait time for the message was accrued (309). If a maximum wait time for the message has accrued (309), the message is sent via the alternate communication means (316). If a maximum wait time for the message has not accrued (312), a select amount of time is allowed to pass without attempting to resend the message (312). After the select amount of wait time, the process continues at (304) where it is again determined if the mobile node is within range of the destination node. Although, this embodiment only categorizes messages as urgent and not urgent it is contemplated that various level of urgency can be assigned to a message with each level warranting a different response (for example, providing different waiting periods before transmission based on the level of urgency). The period of time can be configured for all messages or for each message independently. In other embodiments, messages are held on to for a period time for other reasons such as quality of service reasons, cost of sending the signal, message type, message priority, required reliability, required security, acceptable transit delay and phase of the flight (or mobile node mission). Regarding the cost example, the messages may be held on to for a period of time due to costs associated with using the alternative communication means. Hence, a message in one embodiment is only sent to an alternative network if the available alternative network has an acceptable cost. The mobile node in the ad-hoc network may wait until another ad-hoc route in general direction of the destination becomes available or until a low cost alternative network becomes available. Moreover, in one embodiment, the message urgency is a function of the cost, phase of flight, and/or quality of service. Hence, the present invention is not limited to systems basing the transmission on acceptable delivery time, cost of delivery, quality of service or phase of flight but other factors can be used to determine how a message urgency should be handled during periods implementing the alternative communication system.
Referring back to
The methods and techniques used by the CMF as described above to communication messages in an ad-hoc communication network and supplement routing paths with alternative communication signals are implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or with a programmable processor (for example, a special-purpose processor or a general-purpose processor such as a computer) firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Apparatus embodying these techniques may include appropriate input and output devices, a programmable processor, and a storage medium tangibly embodying program instructions for execution by the programmable processor. A process embodying these techniques may be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform desired functions by operating on input data and generating appropriate output. The techniques may advantageously be implemented in one or more programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and DVD disks. Any of the foregoing may be supplemented by, or incorporated in, specially-designed application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs).
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, which is calculated to achieve the same purpose, may be substituted for the specific embodiment shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4414661 | Karlstrom | Nov 1983 | A |
4901307 | Gilhousen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5095480 | Fenner | Mar 1992 | A |
5530909 | Simon et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5710764 | Yoshimura et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5835059 | Nadel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5933477 | Wu | Aug 1999 | A |
6018659 | Ayyagari et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6047165 | Wright et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064335 | Eschenbach | May 2000 | A |
6084870 | Wooten | Jul 2000 | A |
6104712 | Robert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108539 | Ray et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115580 | Chuprun | Sep 2000 | A |
6147980 | Yee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148179 | Wright | Nov 2000 | A |
6154636 | Wright et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160998 | Wright et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163681 | Wright et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173230 | Camus et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181990 | Grabowsky et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195189 | Nishihata et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6259379 | Paterson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262659 | Korkosz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271768 | Frazier, Jr. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285878 | Lai | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308044 | Wright et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6353779 | Simon | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6438468 | Muxlow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477152 | Hiett | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6606055 | Halsema et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6643274 | D'Annunzio | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6677888 | Roy | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6744396 | Stone et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778825 | Parkman | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781513 | Korkosz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788935 | McKenna et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795408 | Hiett | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810527 | Conrad et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816728 | Igloi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819670 | Fenner | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6915189 | Igloi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925088 | Moreaux | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931248 | Borel | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940832 | Saadawi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965816 | Walker | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970444 | Chwieseni et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990319 | Wright et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7027812 | Dastrup et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072977 | Bernard et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085290 | Cain | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7085562 | Holder et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7116266 | Vesel et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7177295 | Sholander et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7177939 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181160 | Barrett | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187927 | Mitchell | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7343157 | Mitchell | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7398050 | Walker | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7454203 | Levitan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463890 | Herz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7519014 | Allen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522628 | Elliott | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7599314 | Wittenschlaeger | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7633873 | Kohler | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7643426 | Lee | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7729263 | True et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751815 | McKenna et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756508 | Usher et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7769028 | Boley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814322 | Gurevich et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7848278 | Chen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876736 | Inoue | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7894475 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7907893 | Karabinis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7924761 | Stevens | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7940669 | Vaswani et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8023936 | Hudson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8190147 | Kauffman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8284674 | True et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8570990 | Kauffman | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577369 | Achtari et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8811265 | Horvath | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8929830 | Ludwig et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
20020009993 | Dastrup et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020114346 | Lampe | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168971 | Parkman | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191573 | Whitehill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030003872 | Brinkley et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030581 | Roy | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053424 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071743 | Seah et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030072252 | Gurney | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030073406 | Benjamin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030158963 | Sturdy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030231574 | Okuda et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231584 | Zeitfuss | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008253 | Monroe | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028003 | Diener et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040132495 | Horton, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157557 | Barnett et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040235469 | Krug | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050026609 | Brinkley et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053026 | Mullan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054346 | Windham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064895 | Oesterling et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090201 | Lengies et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108374 | Pierzga et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143013 | Jha | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174950 | Ayyagari | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197748 | Holst et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220055 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050221814 | Fagan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050221818 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232185 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234788 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050281270 | Kossi | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286452 | Hardgrave et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023677 | Labrador et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031394 | Tazuma | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060080451 | Eckert | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098608 | Joshi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060167618 | Werback | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176842 | Tamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178141 | McGuffin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183474 | Ziarno et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205345 | Ishikawa | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060270447 | Everson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070026866 | Krishnamurthi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042773 | Alcorn | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042774 | Alcorn | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070072590 | Levitan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070150939 | Aaron | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070183435 | Kettering et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198142 | Werback | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200761 | Smith | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213009 | Higashida et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070284474 | Olson et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286097 | Davies | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297416 | Boley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080095134 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080117858 | Kauffman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080144617 | Molsberry et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150784 | Zhang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151811 | El-Damhougy et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186897 | Rune | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186907 | Yagyuu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205283 | McGuffin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240038 | Lynche et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240062 | Lynch et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274734 | Kostanic et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291843 | Sonnenberg et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005041 | Steinberg | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041041 | True et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090058682 | True | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077626 | Leclercq et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092074 | Jamalipour et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103452 | Horvath | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103473 | Foster | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090141669 | Kauffman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090197595 | Kauffman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090318137 | Kauffman et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318138 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100057899 | Henkel | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100157905 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100272012 | Knefelkamp | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
967815 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1793512 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1850543 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1926234 | May 2008 | EP |
03053013 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005069545 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2007022353 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007043827 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007054410 | May 2007 | WO |
2007059560 | May 2007 | WO |
2008007861 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mouza et al. , “Mobility Patterns”, “Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Database Management”, Jul. 23, 2004, Published in: Toronto, Canada. |
Samal, “Mobility Pattern Aware Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Network ”, May 2003, Publisher: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University , Published in: Blacksburg, Virginia. |
Vyas et al. , “Location and Mobility Pattern Based Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”, “http://www.scs.org/getDoc.cfm?id=2466”, 2003, Publisher: The Society for Modeling and Simulation International. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report”, Jun. 4, 2009, Published in: EP. |
Polajnar et al., “Simple and Efficient Protocols for Guaranteed Message Delivery in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks”, “Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications 2005”, Aug. 22, 2005, pp. 93-100, vol. 3, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: Piscataway, NJ. |
Sakhaee et al., “Aeronautical ad hoc Networks”, “Wireless Communications and Networking Conference”, Jan. 1, 2006, pp. 246-251, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: Piscataway, NJ. |
Zhou et al., “GeoLANMAR: Geo Assisted Landmark Routing for Scalable, Group Motion Wireless Ad Hoc Networks”, “Vehicular Technology Conference 2005”, May 30, 2005, pp. 2420-2424, vol. 4, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: Piscataway, NJ. |
“The ATN SARPs Third Edition”, “Manual of Technical Provisions for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network—ICAO DOC 9705/AN956”, , Publisher: ATN. |
Avionica, “Securelink”, , pp. 1-2, Publisher: AVIONICA. |
Carlos Jodar et al., “Wi-Fi Gatelink Trial Frankfurt and Muich, Germany White Paper”, Aug. 9, 2006, pp. 1-18, Publisher: ARINC Proprietary. |
Eklund et al., “IEEE Standard 802.16: A Technical Overview of the Wirelessman Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access”, “IEEE Communications Magazine”, Jun. 2002, pp. i-107, Publisher: IEEE. |
Hardy et al., “Aircraft Network and File Server—ARINC 763”, Oct. 16, 2002, pp. 1-12, Publisher: AEEC (Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee). |
“Technical Overview for Mark III Communications Management Unit (CMU)”, , pp. 1-59, Publisher: Honeywell Aerospace Electronic Systems. |
Hurlburt et al., “A Data Communications Concept for a SATS Scenario”, “4th Integrated CNS Technologies Conference and Workshop”, Apr. 2004, pp. 1-20. |
Ivancic, “Modular, Cost-Effective, Extensible Avionics Architecture for Secure Mobile Communications”, “2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference—Mar. 4-11, 2006 Big Sky, Montana”, 2006, pp. 1-9, Publisher: IEEE. |
Teledyne Technologies Inc., “Wireless Groundlink System (WGL)”, “www.teledyne-controls.com/productsolution.wirelessgroundlink.groundlink.asp”, 2007, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Teledyne Technologies Inc. |
Teledyne Technologies Inc., “New Release”, “www.teledyne-controls.com/newscenter/sco.asp”, 2007, pp. 1-2, Publisher: Teledyne Technologies Inc. |
Cordeiro et al., “IEEE 802.22: An Introduction to the First Wireless Standard Based on Congitive Radios”, “Journal of Communications”, Apr. 2006, pp. 38-47, vol. 1, No. 1, Publisher: Academy Publisher. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Sep. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Apr. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Dec. 9, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Oct. 2, 2009. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Nov. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Sep. 17, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Jun. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Mar. 17, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Apr. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Feb. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Dec. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, May 20, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Jun. 3, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Apr. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Feb. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Pre-Appeal Brief Decision”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Jun. 25, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Oct. 27, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Pre-Appeal Brief Decision”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Apr. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Apr. 12, 2012. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Apr. 10, 2012, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, May 3, 2012, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Sep. 13, 2012, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Aug. 16, 2012, pp. 1-16. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, May 3, 2012, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “European Search Report”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Apr. 5, 2012, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Apr. 5, 2011, pp. 1-21, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Sep. 29, 2009, p. 1, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, May 26, 2010, pp. 1-3, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Mar. 20, 2009, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Aug. 28, 2012, pp. 1-27. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,685”, Sep. 11, 2009, p. 1, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,685”, Jan. 23, 2012, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,685”, May 8, 2009, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Nov. 13, 2009, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Jun. 25, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Apr. 8, 2011, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
Drula et al., “Adaptive Energy Conserving Algorithms for Neighbor Discovery in Opportunistic Bluetooth Networks”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Jan. 2007, pp. 96-107, vol. 25, No. 1, Publisher: IEEE. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Dec. 26, 2013, pp. 1-43, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Sep. 19, 2013, pp. 1-7, Published in: US. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 09151372.1 mailed Feb. 3, 2014”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,685”, Feb. 3, 2014, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Apr. 15, 2014, pp. 1-16, Published in: US. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action from CA Application No. 2,669,062 mailed Nov. 3, 2015”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/143,369”, Nov. 3, 2015, pp. 1-4, Published in: CA. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Jul. 8, 2015, pp. 1-15, Published in: US. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action from CA Application No. 2,645,527 mailed Jun. 30, 2015”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,218”, Jun. 30, 2015, pp. 1-5, Published in: CA. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Oct. 8, 2015, pp. 1-9. |
U.S. Patent Office, “Decision on Appeal”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Apr. 23, 2015, pp. 1-9. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,641,083”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,660”, Apr. 15, 2015, pp. 1-3, Published in: CA. |
Canadian Patent Office, “Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,641,082”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662”, Apr. 15, 2015, pp. 1-3, Published in: CA. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action from CA Application No. 2,651,435 mailed May 20, 2015”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,685”, May 20, 2015, pp. 1-3, Published in: CA. |
Canadian Patent Office, Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,641,082, from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 11/875,662, filed Apr. 5, 2016, pp. 1-3, Published in: CA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090197595 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |