Patent Grant
10568891
This application is directed to pharmaceutical compositions, methods, and devices related to hormone replacement therapy.
Postmenopausal women frequently suffer from atrophic vaginitis or vulvar and vaginal atrophy (hereinafter “vulvovaginal atrophy” or “VVA”) with symptoms including, for example, vaginal dryness, vaginal odor, vaginal or vulvar irritation or itching, dysuria (pain, burning, or stinging when urinating), dyspareunia (vaginal pain associated with sexual activity), or vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity. Other symptoms include soreness; with urinary frequency and urgency; urinary discomfort and incontinence also occurring (“estrogen-deficient urinary state(s)”). One symptom of vaginal atrophy is an increased vaginal pH, which creates an environment more susceptible to infections. The mucosal epithelium of the VVA patients also reported to show signs of severe atrophy and upon cytological examination accompanied by an increased number of the parabasal cells and a reduced number of superficial cells.
Each of these VVA-related states manifest symptoms associated with decreased estrogenization of the vulvovaginal tissue, and can even occur in women treated with oral administration of an estrogen-based pharmaceutical drug product. Although VVA is most common with menopausal women, it can occur at any time in a woman's life cycle. VVA symptoms also interfere with sexual activity and satisfaction. Women with female sexual dysfunction (FSD) are almost 4 times more likely to have VVA than those without FSD.
Estrogen treatment has proven to be very successful in controlling menopausal symptoms, including VVA and FSD. Several studies have shown that the symptoms connected with vaginal atrophy are often relieved by estrogen treatment given either systemically or topically. The existing treatments have numerous problems, for example compliance issues with patients not completing or continuing treatment due to the problems associated with the form of treatment.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for treatments for VVA and FSD that overcome these limitations.
Disclosed herein is, among other things, a new soft gel vaginal pharmaceutical composition and dosage form containing solubilized estradiol for the treatment of VVA. The soft gel vaginal pharmaceutical composition has been designed to mitigate common limitations found with other vaginal forms of estradiol. The soft gel vaginal pharmaceutical composition eases vaginal administration, provides improved safety of insertion, minimizes vaginal discharge following administration, and provides a more effective dosage form having improved efficacy, safety and patient compliance.
According to various aspects and embodiments of this disclosure, a soft gel vaginal pharmaceutical composition as a treatment for post-menopausal women suffering with moderate to severe symptoms of VVA is provided.
Provided herein is a suppository comprising: a) a therapeutically effective amount of estradiol; and b) a solubilizing agent comprising a medium chain oil.
In some embodiments, the suppository includes about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol. For example, the suppository can include about 1 μg to about 10 μg of estradiol; and about 10 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the estradiol is solubilized.
In some embodiments, the medium chain oil includes at least one C6-C12 fatty acid or a glycol, monoglyceride, diglyceride, or triglyceride ester thereof.
In some embodiments, the solubilizing agent includes at least one ester selected from the group consisting of: an ester of caproic fatty acid, an ester of caprylic fatty acid, an ester of capric fatty acid, and combinations thereof. For example, the solubilizing agent can include a caprylic/capric triglyceride.
In some embodiments, the suppository further includes a capsule. For example, the capsule can be a soft gelatin capsule.
Also provided herein is a suppository comprising: a) a therapeutically effective amount of estradiol; b) a caprylic/capric triglyceride; c) a non-ionic surfactant comprising PEG-6 stearate and ethylene glycol palmitostearate; and d) a soft gelatin capsule.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 25 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 19 pg/mL to about 29 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 75 pg*hr/mL to about 112 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 25 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 9 pg/mL to about 14 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 43 pg*hr/mL to about 65 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 25 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 416 pg/mL to about 613 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate of about 3598 pg*hr/mL to about 5291 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 10 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 12 pg/mL to about 18 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 42 pg*hr/mL to about 63 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estradiol of about 1 hrs to about 3 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 10 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 4 pg/mL to about 7 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 20 pg*hr/mL to about 31 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone of about 4 hrs to about 8 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 10 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 10 pg/mL to about 16 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate of about 56 pg*hr/mL to about 84 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone sulfate of about 4 hrs to about 7 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 4 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 4 pg/mL to about 8 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 16 pg*hr/mL to about 26 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estradiol of about 0.25 hrs to about 2 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 4 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 1 pg/mL to about 3 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 8 pg*hr/mL to about 13 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone of about 1 hrs to about 4 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository provided herein includes about 4 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 4 pg/mL to about 7 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate of about 22 pg*hr/mL to about 34 pg*hr/mL. In some embodiments, the suppository further provides a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone sulfate of about 1 hrs to about 3 hrs.
Also provided herein is a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol that is less than about 30 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol that is less than about 18 pg/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol is provided, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol that is less than about 112 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol that is less than about 63 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol is provided, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone that is less than about 14 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone that is less than about 7 pg/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol is provided, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone that is less than about 65 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone that is less than about 31 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol is provided, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate that is less than about 613 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate that is less than about 16 pg/mL.
In some embodiments, a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol is provided, wherein administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate that is less than about 5291 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate that is less than about 84 pg*hr/mL.
Further provided herein is a suppository comprising about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol, wherein administration of the suppository to the proximal region of the vagina of a patient provides a therapeutically effective concentration of estradiol over 24 hours in the proximal region of the vagina.
This disclosure also provides a method of treating an estrogen-deficient state, the method comprising administering to a patient in need thereof, a suppository as provided herein. In some embodiments, a method of treating vulvovaginal atrophy is provided, the method comprising administering to a patient in need thereof, a suppository as provided herein.
In some embodiments of the methods provided herein, treatment includes reducing the severity of one or more symptoms selected from the group consisting of: vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, vaginal or vulvar irritation, vaginal or vulvar burning, vaginal or vulvar itching, dysuria, and vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity.
In some embodiments of the methods provided herein treatment includes reducing the vaginal pH of the patient. For example, treatment includes reducing the vaginal pH of the patient to a pH of less than about 5.0.
In some embodiments of the methods provided herein treatment includes a change in cell composition of the patient. For example, the change in cell composition includes reducing the number of parabasal vaginal cells or increasing the number of superficial vaginal cells. In some embodiments, the number of parabasal vaginal cells in the patient are reduced by at least about 35% (e.g., at least about 50%). In some embodiments, the number of superficial vaginal cells are increased by at least about 5% (e.g., at least about 35%).
Further provided herein is a method for reducing vaginal discharge following administration of a suppository, the method comprising administering to a patient in need thereof, a suppository provided herein, wherein the vaginal discharge following administration of the suppository is compared to the vaginal discharge following administration of a reference drug.
Also provided herein is a method for treating female sexual dysfunction in a female subject in need thereof. The method includes administering to the subject a vaginal suppository as described herein. In some embodiments, the method includes administering to the subject a vaginal suppository comprising: (a) a pharmaceutical composition comprising: a therapeutically effective amount of estradiol; a caprylic/capric triglyceride; a non-ionic surfactant comprising PEG-6 stearate and ethylene glycol palmitostearate; and (b) a soft gelatin capsule; wherein the vaginal suppository includes from about 1 microgram to about 25 micrograms of estradiol; wherein estradiol is the only active hormone in the vaginal suppository. In some embodiments, the vaginal suppository does not include a hydrophilic gel-forming bioadhesive agent in the solubilizing agent. In some embodiments, treating female sexual dysfunction includes increasing the subject's desire, arousal, lubrication, satisfaction, and or/orgasms.
The above-mentioned features and objects of the this disclosure will become more apparent with reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and in which:
In the following detailed description of embodiments of this disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which this disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice this disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the this disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of this disclosure is defined only by the appended claims. As used in this disclosure, the term “or” shall be understood to be defined as a logical disjunction (i.e., and/or) and shall not indicate an exclusive disjunction unless expressly indicated as such with the terms “either,” “unless,” “alternatively,” and words of similar effect.
The term “active pharmaceutical ingredient” (“API”) as used herein, means the active compound(s) used in formulating a drug product.
The term “co-administered” as used herein, means that two or more drug products are administered simultaneously or sequentially on the same or different days.
The term “drug product” as used herein means at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient in combination with at least one excipient and provided in unit dosage form.
The term “area under the curve” (“AUC”) refers to the area under the curve defined by changes in the blood concentration of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, over time following the administration of a dose of the active pharmaceutical ingredient. “AUC0-∞” is the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity following the administration of a dose. “AUC0-t” is the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t following the administration of a dose, wherein t is the last time point with a measurable concentration.
The term “Cmax” refers to the maximum value of blood concentration shown on the curve that represents changes in blood concentrations of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., progesterone or estradiol), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, over time.
The term “Tmax” refers to the time that it takes for the blood concentration an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone), or a metabolite of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, to reach the maximum value.
The term “bioavailability,” which has the meaning defined in 21 C.F.R. § 320.1(a), refers to the rate and extent to which an API or active ingredient or active moiety is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action. For example, bioavailability can be measured as the amount of API in the blood (serum or plasma) as a function of time. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters such as AUC, Cmax, or Tmax may be used to measure and assess bioavailability. For drug products that are not intended to be absorbed into the bloodstream, bioavailability may be assessed by measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which the API or active ingredient or active moiety becomes available at the site of action.
The term “bioequivalent,” which has the meaning defined in 21 C.F.R. § 320.1(e), refers to the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which the API or active ingredient or active moiety in pharmaceutical equivalents or pharmaceutical alternatives becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions in an appropriately designed study. Where there is an intentional difference in rate (e.g., in certain extended release dosage forms), certain pharmaceutical equivalents or alternatives may be considered bioequivalent if there is no significant difference in the extent to which the active ingredient or moiety from each product becomes available at the site of drug action. This applies only if the difference in the rate at which the active ingredient or moiety becomes available at the site of drug action is intentional and is reflected in the proposed labeling, is not essential to the attainment of effective body drug concentrations on chronic use, and is considered medically insignificant for the drug. In practice, two products are considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval of the AUC, Cmax, or optionally Tmax is within 80.00% to 125.00%.
The term “bio-identical,” “body-identical,” or “natural” used in conjunction with the hormones disclosed herein, means hormones that match the chemical structure and effect of those that occur naturally or endogenously in the human body. An exemplary natural estrogen is estradiol.
The term “bio-identical hormone” or “body-identical hormone” refers to an active pharmaceutical ingredient that is structurally identical to a hormone naturally or endogenously found in the human body (e.g., estradiol and progesterone).
The term “estradiol” refers to (17β)-estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol. Estradiol is also interchangeably called 17β-estradiol, oestradiol, or E2, and is found endogenously in the human body. As used herein, estradiol refers to the bio-identical or body-identical form of estradiol found in the human body having the structure:
Estradiol is supplied in an anhydrous or hemi-hydrate form. For the purposes of this disclosure, the anhydrous form or the hemihydrate form can be substituted for the other by accounting for the water or lack of water according to well-known and understood techniques.
The term “solubilized estradiol” means that the estradiol or a portion thereof is solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent(s) or the formulations disclosed herein. Solubilized estradiol may include estradiol that is about 80% solubilized, about 85% solubilized, about 90% solubilized, about 95% solubilized, about 96% solubilized, about 97% solubilized, about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. In some embodiments, the estradiol is “fully solubilized” with all or substantially all of the estradiol being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent. Fully solubilized estradiol may include estradiol that is about 97% solubilized, about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. Solubility can be expressed as a mass fraction (% w/w, which is also referred to as wt %).
The term “progesterone” refers to pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione. Progesterone is also interchangeably called P4 and is found endogenously in the human body. As used herein, progesterone refers to the bio-identical or body-identical form of progesterone found in the human body having the structure:
The term “solubilized progesterone” means that the progesterone or a portion thereof is solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent(s) or the formulations disclosed herein. In some embodiments, the progesterone is “partially solubilized” with a portion of the progesterone being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent and a portion of the progesterone being suspended in the solubilizing agent. Partially solubilized progesterone may include progesterone that is about 1% solubilized, about 5% solubilized, about 10% solubilized, about 15% solubilized, about 20% solubilized, about 30% solubilized, about 40% solubilized, about 50% solubilized, about 60% solubilized, about 70% solubilized, about 80% solubilized, about 85% solubilized, about 90% solubilized or about 95% solubilized. In other embodiments, the progesterone is “fully solubilized” with all or substantially all of the progesterone being solubilized or dissolved in the solubilizing agent. Fully solubilized progesterone may include progesterone that is about 97% solubilized, about 98% solubilized, about 99% solubilized or about 100% solubilized. Solubility can be expressed as a mass fraction (% w/w, which is also referred to as wt %).
The terms “micronized progesterone” and “micronized estradiol,” as used herein, include micronized progesterone and micronized estradiol having an X50 particle size value below about 15 microns or having an X90 particle size value below about 25 microns. The term “X50” means that one-half of the particles in a sample are smaller in diameter than a given number. For example, micronized progesterone having an X50 of 5 microns means that, for a given sample of micronized progesterone, one-half of the particles have a diameter of less than 5 microns. Similarly, the term “X90” means that ninety percent (90%) of the particles in a sample are smaller in diameter than a given number.
The term “glyceride” is an ester of glycerol (1,2,3-propanetriol) with acyl radicals of fatty acids and is also known as an acylglycerol. If only one position of the glycerol molecule is esterified with a fatty acid, a “monoglyceride” or “monoacylglycerol” is produced; if two positions are esterified, a “diglyceride” or “diacylglycerol” is produced; and if all three positions of the glycerol are esterified with fatty acids, a “triglyceride” or “triacylglycerol” is produced. A glyceride is “simple” if all esterified positions contain the same fatty acid; whereas a glyceride is “mixed” if the esterified positions contained different fatty acids. The carbons of the glycerol backbone are designated sn-1, sn-2 and sn-3, with sn-2 being in the middle carbon and sn-1 and sn-3 being the end carbons of the glycerol backbone.
The term “solubilizing agent” refers to an agent or combination of agents that solubilize an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., estradiol or progesterone). For example and without limitation, suitable solubilizing agents include medium chain oils and other solvents and co-solvents that solubilize or dissolve an active pharmaceutical ingredient to a desirable extent. Solubilizing agents suitable for use in the formulations disclosed herein are pharmaceutical grade solubilizing agents (e.g., pharmaceutical grade medium chain oils). It will be understood by those of skill in the art that other excipients or components can be added to or mixed with the solubilizing agent to enhance the properties or performance of the solubilizing agent or resulting formulation. Examples of such excipients include, but are not limited to, surfactants, emulsifiers, thickeners, colorants, flavoring agents, etc. In some embodiments, the solubilizing agent is a medium chain oil and, in some other embodiments, the medium chain oil is combined with a co-solvent(s) or other excipient(s).
The term “medium chain” is used to describe the aliphatic chain length of fatty acid containing molecules. “Medium chain” specifically refers to fatty acids, fatty acid esters, or fatty acid derivatives that contain fatty acid aliphatic tails or carbon chains that contain 6 (C6) to 14 (C14) carbon atoms, 8 (C8) to 12 (C12) carbon atoms, or 8 (C8) to 10 (C10) carbon atoms.
The terms “medium chain fatty acid” and “medium chain fatty acid derivative” are used to describe fatty acids or fatty acid derivatives with aliphatic tails (i.e., carbon chains) having 6 to 14 carbon atoms. Fatty acids consist of an unbranched or branched aliphatic tail attached to a carboxylic acid functional group. Fatty acid derivatives include, for example, fatty acid esters and fatty acid containing molecules, including, without limitation, mono-, di- and triglycerides that include components derived from fatty acids. Fatty acid derivatives also include fatty acid esters of ethylene or propylene glycol. The aliphatic tails can be saturated or unsaturated (i.e., having one or more double bonds between carbon atoms). In some embodiments, the aliphatic tails are saturated (i.e., no double bonds between carbon atoms). Medium chain fatty acids or medium chain fatty acid derivatives include those with aliphatic tails having 6-14 carbons, including those that are C6-C14, C6-C12, C8-C14, C8-C12, C6-C10, C8-C10, or others. Examples of medium chain fatty acids include, without limitation, caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, myristic acid, and derivatives thereof.
The term “oil,” as used herein, refers to any pharmaceutically acceptable oil, especially medium chain oils, and specifically excluding peanut oil, that can suspend or solubilize bioidentical progesterone or estradiol, including starting materials or precursors thereof, including micronized progesterone or micronized estradiol as described herein.
The term “medium chain oil” refers to an oil wherein the composition of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is substantially medium chain (i.e., C6 to C14) fatty acids, i.e., the composition profile of fatty acids in the oil is substantially medium chain. As used herein, “substantially” means that between 20% and 100% (inclusive of the upper and lower limits) of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is made up of medium chain fatty acids, i.e., fatty acids with aliphatic tails (i.e., carbon chains) having 6 to 14 carbons. In some embodiments, about 25%, about 30%, about 35%, about 40%, about 45%, about 50%, about 55%, about 60%, about 65%, about 70%, about 75%, about 85%, about 90% or about 95% of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is made up of medium chain fatty acids. As used herein, “predominantly” means that greater than or equal to 50% of the fatty acid fraction of the oil is made up of medium-chain fatty acids, i.e., fatty acids with aliphatic carbon chains having 6 to 14 carbon atoms. Those of skill in the art that will readily appreciate that the terms “alkyl content” or “alkyl distribution” of an oil can be used in place of the term “fatty acid fraction” of an oil in characterizing a given oil or solubilizing agent, and these terms are used interchangeable herein. As such, medium chain oils suitable for use in the formulations disclosed herein include medium chain oils wherein the fatty acid fraction of the oil is substantially medium chain fatty acids, or medium chain oils wherein the alkyl content or alkyl distribution of the oil is substantially medium chain alkyls (C6-C12 alkyls). It will be understood by those of skill in the art that the medium chain oils suitable for use in the formulations disclosed herein are pharmaceutical grade (e.g., pharmaceutical grade medium chain oils). Examples of medium chain oils include, for example and without limitation, medium chain fatty acids, medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerol (e.g., for example, mono-, di-, and triglycerides), medium chain fatty acid esters of propylene glycol, medium chain fatty acid derivatives of polyethylene glycol, and combinations thereof.
The term “ECN” or “equivalent carbon number” means the sum of the number of carbon atoms in the fatty acid chains of an oil, and can be used to characterize an oil as, for example, a medium chain oil or a long-chain oil. For example, tripalmitin (tripalmitic glycerol), which is a simple triglyceride containing three fatty acid chains of 16 carbon atoms, has an ECN of 3×16=48. Conversely, a triglyceride with an ECN=40 may have “mixed” fatty acid chain lengths of 8, 16 and 16; 10, 14 and 16; 8, 14 and 18; etc. Naturally occurring oils are frequently “mixed” with respect to specific fatty acids, but tend not to contain both long chain fatty acids and medium chain fatty acids in the same glycerol backbone. Thus, triglycerides with ECN's of 21-42 typically contain predominantly medium chain fatty acids; while triglycerides with ECN's of greater than 43 typically contain predominantly long chain fatty acids. For example, the ECN of corn oil triglyceride in the USP would be in the range of 51-54. Medium chain diglycerides with ECN's of 12-28 will often contain predominanty medium chain fatty chains, while diglycerides with ECN's of 32 or greater will typically contain predominanty long chain fatty acid tails. Monoglycerides will have an ECN that matches the chain length of the sole fatty acid chain. Thus, monoglyceride ECN's in the range of 6-14 contain mainly medium chain fatty acids, and monoglycerides with ECN's 16 or greater will contain mainly long chain fatty acids.
The average ECN of a medium chain triglyceride oil is typically 21-42. For example, as listed in the US Pharmacopeia (USP), medium chain triglycerides have the following composition as the exemplary oil set forth in the table below:
and would have an average ECN of 3*[(6*0.02)+(8*0.70)+(10*0.25)+(12*0.02)+(14*0.01)]=25.8. The ECN of the exemplary medium chain triglycerides oil can also be expressed as a range (per the ranges set forth in the USP) of 24.9-27.0. For oils that have mixed mono-, di-, and triglycerides, or single and double fatty acid glycols, the ECN of the entire oil can be determined by calculating the ECN of each individual component (e.g., C8 monoglycerides, C8 diglycerides, C10 monoglycerides, and C10 monoglycerides) and taking the sum of the relative percentage of the component multiplied by the ECN normalized to a monoglyceride for each component. For example, the oil having C8 and C10 mono- and diglycerides shown in the table below has an ECN of 8.3, and is thus a medium chain oil.
Expressed differently, ECN can be calculated as each chain length in the composition multiplied by its relative percentage in the oil: (8*0.85)+(10*0.15)=8.3.
The term “excipients,” as used herein, refers to non-API ingredients such as solubilizing agents, anti-oxidants, oils, lubricants, and others used in formulating pharmaceutical products.
The term “patient” or “subject” refers to an individual to whom the pharmaceutical composition is administered.
The term “pharmaceutical composition” refers to a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least a solubilizing agent and estradiol. As used herein, pharmaceutical compositions are delivered, for example via suppository (i.e., vaginal suppository), or absorbed vaginally.
The term “progestin” means any natural or man-made substance that has pharmacological properties similar to progesterone.
The terms “treat,” “treating,” and “treatment” refer to any indicia of success in the treatment or amelioration of an injury, disease, or condition, including any objective or subjective parameter such as abatement; remission; diminishing of symptoms or making the injury, disease, or condition more tolerable to the patient; slowing in the rate of degeneration or decline; or improving a patient's physical or mental well-being. The treatment or amelioration of symptoms can be based on objective or subject parameters, including the results of a physical examination, neuropsychiatric examinations, or psychiatric evaluation.
The terms “atrophic vaginitis,” “vulvovaginal atrophy,” “vaginal atrophy,” and “VVA” are used herein interchangeably. The molecular morphology of VVA is well known in the medical field.
As used herein, “sexual dysfunction” refers to a condition having one or more symptoms of difficulty during any one or more stages. The dysfunction can prevent an individual from enjoying sexual activity. Non-limiting examples of symptoms of sexual dysfunction include: reduced sexual desire, reduced sexual pleasure, reduced sexual arousal and excitement, aversion to and avoidance of genital sexual contact, inability to attain or maintain arousal, and persistent or recurrent delay of, or absence of orgasm. Sexual dysfunction may be lifelong (no effective performance ever) or acquired (after a period of normal function); generalized or limited to certain situations or certain partners; and total or partial.
As used herein, “sexual desire” refers to the frequency of wanting to engage in sexual activity and/or the frequency of engaging in sexual activity as perceived by the individual. Sexual desire can be expressed, for example, in one or more cognitive activities, including the frequency of sexual thoughts, the extent of enjoyment of movies, books, music, etc. having sexual content and/or the extent of enjoyment or pleasure of thinking and fantasizing about sex as perceived by the individual.
As used herein, “sexual arousal” refers to the frequency of becoming sexually aroused, how readily sexual arousal occurs and/or if arousal is maintained, as perceived by the individual. Psychologically, arousal can include factors such as increased desire for sexual activity and excitement related to sexual activity. Physiologically, arousal can include increased blood flow to the genitals, causing clitoral engorgement, as well as vaginal lubrication.
As used herein, “lubrication” refers to wetness in and around the vagina before, during, or after sexual activity. Increasing lubrication can include increasing the frequency of lubrication; decreasing the difficulty of becoming lubricated; and/or decreasing the difficulty in maintaining lubrication.
As used herein, “satisfaction” refers to one or more positive emotions (e.g., contentment, fulfillment, gratification, and the like) related to a sexual activity or sexual relationship. Satisfaction can include, for example, satisfaction with occurrence of sexual arousal or orgasm, satisfaction with the amount of closeness with a partner, and satisfaction with overall sex life.
As used herein, “orgasm” refers to the highest point of sexual excitement characterized by a subjective experience of intense pleasure marked normally by vaginal contractions in females. Increasing orgasm can include increasing the frequency, duration, and/or intensity of orgasms in a subject. Increasing orgasm can also include decreasing the difficulty of reaching orgasm.
Provided herein are pharmaceutical compositions comprising solubilized estradiol designed to be absorbed vaginally. The pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are designed to be absorbed and have their therapeutic effect locally, e.g., in vaginal or surrounding tissue. Further disclosed herein are data demonstrating efficacy of the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed, as well as methods relating to the pharmaceutical compositions. Generally, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are useful in VVA, dyspareunia, and other indications caused by decrease or lack of estrogen.
Additional aspects and embodiments of this disclosure include: providing increased patient ease of use while potentially minimizing certain side effects from inappropriate insertion, minimizing incidence of vulvovaginal mycotic infection compared to incidence of vulvovaginal mycotic infection due to usage of other vaginally applied estradiol products; and, improved side effect profile (e.g., pruritus) compared to, for example, VAGIFEM® (estradiol vaginal tablets, Novo Nordisk; Princeton, N.J.).
Functionality
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are alcohol-free or substantially alcohol-free. The pharmaceutical compositions offer provide for improved patient compliance because of improvements over the prior offering. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are encapsulated in soft gelatin capsules, which improve comfort during use. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions are substantially liquid, which are more readily absorbed in the vaginal tissue, and also are dispersed over a larger surface area of the vaginal tissue.
Estradiol
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are for vaginal insertion in a single or multiple unit dosage form. According to embodiments, the estradiol in the pharmaceutical compositions is at least about: 75%, 76%, 77%, 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% solubilized. According to embodiments and where the estradiol is not 100% solubilized, the remaining estradiol is present in a micronized (crystalline) form that is absorbable by the body and retains biological functionality, either in its micronized form or in another form which the micronized form is converted to after administration.
According to embodiments, all or some of the estradiol is solubilized in a solubilizing agent during manufacturing process. According to embodiments, all or some of the estradiol is solubilized following administration (e.g., the micronized portion where the estradiol is not 100% solubilized is solubilized in a body fluid after administration). According to embodiments, because the estradiol is solubilized, the solubilizing agents taught herein, with or without additional excipients other than the solubilizing agents, are liquid or semi-solid. To the extent the estradiol is not fully solubilized at the time of administration/insertion, the estradiol should be substantially solubilized at a body temperature (average of 37° C.) and, generally, at the pH of the vagina (ranges from 3.8 to 4.5 in healthy patients; or 4.6 to 6.5 in VVA patients).
According to embodiments, the estradiol can be added to the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein as estradiol, estradiol hemihydrate, or other grade estradiol forms used in pharmaceutical compositions or formulations.
According to embodiments, estradiol dosage strengths vary. Estradiol (or estradiol hemihydrate, for example, to the extent the water content of the estradiol hemihydrate is accounted for) dosage strength of is from at least about 1 microgram (μg or μg) to at least about 50 μg. Specific dosage embodiments contain at least about: 1 μg, 2 μg, 3 μg, 4 μg, 5 μg, 6 μg, 7 μg, 8 μg, 9 μg, 10 μg, 11 μg, 12 μg, 13 μg, 14 μg, 15 μg, 16 μg, 17 μg, 18 μg, 19 μg, 20 μg, 21 μg, 22 μg, 23 μg, 24 μg, 25 μg, 26 μg, 27 μg, 28 μg, 29 μg, 30 μg, 31 μg, 32 μg, 33 μg, 34 μg, 35 μg, 36 μg, 37 μg, 38 μg, 39 μg, 40 μg, 41 μg, 42 μg, 43 μg, 44 μg, 45 μg, 46 μg, 47 μg, 48 μg, 49 μg, or 50 μg estradiol. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain at least about 2.5 μg; 4 μg 6.25 μg, 7.5 μg, 12.5 μg, 18.75 μg of estradiol. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions contain from about 1 μg to about 10 μg, from 3 μg to 7 μg, from about 7.5 μg to 12.5 μg, from about 10 μg to about 25 μg, about 1 μg, about 2.5 μg, from about 23.5 μg to 27.5 μg, from about 7.5 μg to 22.5 μg, from 10 μg to 25 μg of estradiol. The lowest clinically effective dose of estradiol is used for treatment of VVA and other indications set forth herein. In some embodiments, the estradiol dosage is about 4 μg. In one embodiment, the estradiol dosage is about 10 μg. In another embodiment, the estradiol dosage is about 25 μg.
Solvent System
According to embodiments, the solvent system that solubilizes the estradiol are medium chain fatty acid based solvents, together with other excipients. According to embodiments, the solvent system includes non-toxic, pharmaceutically acceptable solvents, co-solvents, surfactants, and other excipients suitable for vaginal delivery or absorption.
According to embodiments, oils having medium chain fatty acids as a majority component are used as solubilizing agents to solubilize estradiol. According to embodiments, the solubilizing agents comprise medium chain fatty acid esters (e.g., esters of glycerol, ethylene glycol, or propylene glycol) or mixtures thereof. According to embodiments, the medium chain fatty acids comprise chain lengths from C6 to C14. According to embodiments the medium chain fatty acids comprise chain lengths from C6 to C12. According to embodiments the medium chain fatty acids substantially comprise chain lengths from C8-C10. ECN's for medium chain oils will be in the range of 21-42 for triglycerides, 12-28 for diglycerides, and 6-14 for monoglycerides.
According to embodiments, the medium chain fatty acids are saturated. According to embodiments, the medium chain fatty acids are predominantly saturated, i.e., greater than about 60% or greater than about 75% saturated.
According to embodiments, estradiol is soluble in the solubilizing agent at room temperature, although it may be desirable to warm certain solubilizing agents during manufacture to improve viscosity. According to embodiments, the solubilizing agent is liquid at between room temperature and about 50° C., at or below 50° C., at or below 40° C., or at or below 30° C.
According to embodiments, the solubility of estradiol in the medium chain oil, medium chain fatty acid, or solubilizing agent (or oil/surfactant) is at least about 0.01 wt %, 0.02 wt %, 0.05 wt %, 0.06 wt %, 0.08 wt %, 0.1 wt %, 0.2 wt %, 0.3 wt %, 0.4 wt %, 0.5 wt %, 0.6 wt %, 0.7 wt %, 0.8 wt %, 0.9 wt %, 1.0 wt %, or higher.
According to embodiments, medium chain solubilizing agents include, for example and without limitation saturated medium chain fatty acids: caproic acid (C6), enanthic acid (C7), caprylic acid (C8), pelargonic acid (C9), capric acid (C10), undecylic acid (C11), lauric acid (C12), tridecylic acid (C13), or myristic acid (C14). According to embodiments, the solubilizing agent includes oils made of these free medium chain fatty acids, oils of medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerin, propylene glycol, or ethylene glycol, or combinations thereof. These examples comprise predominantly saturated medium chain fatty acids (i.e., greater than 50% of the fatty acids are medium chain saturated fatty acids). According to embodiments, predominantly C6 to C12 saturated fatty acids are contemplated. According to embodiments, the solubilizing agent is selected from at least one of a solvent or co-solvent.
According to embodiments, glycerin based solubilizing agents include: mono-, di-, or triglycerides and combinations and derivatives thereof. Exemplary glycerin based solubilizing agents include MIGLYOLs®, which are caprylic/capric triglycerides (SASOL Germany GMBH, Hamburg). MIGLYOLs includes MIGLYOL 810 (caprylic/capric triglyceride), MIGLYOL 812 (caprylic/capric triglyceride), MIGLYOL 816 (caprylic/capric triglyceride), and MIGLYOL 829 (caprylic/capric/succinic triglyceride). Other caprylic/capric triglyceride solubilizing agents are likewise contemplated, including, for example: caproic/caprylic/capric/lauric triglycerides; caprylic/capric/linoleic triglycerides; caprylic/capric/succinic triglycerides. According to embodiments, CAPMUL MCM, medium chain mono- and di-glycerides, is the solubilizing agent. Other and triglycerides of fractionated vegetable fatty acids, and combinations or derivatives thereof can be the solubilizing agent, according to embodiments. For example, the solubilizing agent can be 1,2,3-propanetriol (glycerol, glycerin, glycerine) esters of saturated coconut and palm kernel oil and derivatives thereof.
Ethylene and propylene glycols (which include polyethylene and polypropylene glycols) solubilizing agents include: glyceryl mono- and di-caprylates; propylene glycol monocaprylate (e.g., CAPMUL® PG-8 (the CAPMUL brands are owned by ABITEC, Columbus, Ohio)); propylene glycol monocaprate (e.g., CAPMUL PG-10); propylene glycol mono- and dicaprylates; propylene glycol mono- and dicaprate; diethylene glycol mono ester (e.g., TRANSCUTOL®, 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)ethanol, GATTEFOSSE SAS); and diethylene glycol monoethyl ether. Other combinations of mono- and di-esters of propylene glycol or ethylene glycol are expressly contemplated are the solubilizing agent.
According to embodiments, the solubilizing agent includes combinations of mono- and di-propylene and ethylene glycols and mono-, di-, and triglyceride combinations. According to embodiments, polyethylene glycol glyceride (GELUCIRE®, GATTEFOSSE SAS, Saint-Priest, France) can be used herein as the solubilizing agent or as a surfactant. For example, GELUCIRE 44/14 (PEG-32 glyceryl laurate EP), a medium chain fatty acid esters of polyethylene glycol, is a polyethylene glycol glyceride composed of mono-, di- and triglycerides and mono- and diesters of polyethylene glycol.
According to embodiments, commercially available fatty acid glycerol and glycol ester solubilizing agents are often prepared from natural oils and therefore may comprise components in addition to the fatty acid esters that predominantly comprise and characterize the solubilizing agent. Such other components may be, e.g., other fatty acid mono-, di-, and triglycerides; fatty acid mono- and diester ethylene or propylene glycols, free glycerols or glycols, or free fatty acids, for example. In some embodiments, when an oil/solubilizing agent is described herein as a saturated C8 fatty acid mono- or diester of glycerol, the predominant component of the oil, i.e., >50 wt % (e.g., >75 wt %, >85 wt % or >90 wt %) is caprylic monoglycerides and caprylic diglycerides. For example, the Technical Data Sheet by ABITEC for CAPMUL MCM C8 describes CAPMUL MCM C8 as being composed of mono and diglycerides of medium chain fatty acids (mainly caprylic) and describes the alkyl content as ≤1% C6, ≥95% C8, ≤5% C10, and ≤1.5% C12 and higher.
For example, MIGLYOL 812 is a solubilizing agent that is generally described as a C8-C10 triglyceride because the fatty acid composition is at least about 80% triglyceride esters of caprylic acid (C8) and capric acid (C10). However, it also includes small amounts of other fatty acids, e.g., less than about 5% of caproic acid (C6), lauric acid (C12), and myristic acid (C14). The product information sheet for various MIGLYOLs illustrate the various fatty acid components as follows:
According to embodiments, anionic or non-ionic surfactants may be used in pharmaceutical compositions containing solubilized estradiol. Ratios of solubilizing agent(s) to surfactant(s) vary depending upon the respective solubilizing agent(s) and the respective surfactant(s) and the desired physical characteristics of the resultant pharmaceutical composition. For example and without limitation, CAPMUL MCM and a non-ionic surfactant may be used at ratios including 65:35, 70:30, 75:25, 80:20, 85:15 and 90:10. Other non-limiting examples include: CAPMUL MCM and GELUCIRE 39/01 used in ratios including, for example and without limitation, 6:4, 7:3, and 8:2; CAPMUL MCM and GELUCIRE 43/01 used in ratios including, for example and without limitation, 7:3, and 8:2; CAPMUL MCM and GELUCIRE 50/13 used in ratios including, for example and without limitation, 7:3, and 8:2, and 9:1.
Other Excipients
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further includes a surfactant. The surfactant can be a nonionic surfactant, cationic surfactant, anionic surfactant, or mixtures thereof. Suitable surfactants include, for example, water-insoluble surfactants having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value less than 12 and water-soluble surfactants having a HLB value greater than 12. Surfactants that have a high HLB and hydrophilicity, aid the formation of oil-water droplets. The surfactants are amphiphilic in nature and are capable of dissolving or solubilizing relatively high amounts of hydrophobic drug compounds.
Non-limiting examples, include, Tween, Dimethylacetamide (DMA), Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Ethanol, Glycerin, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), PEG 300, PEG 400, Poloxamer 407, Propylene glycol, Phospholipids, Hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine (HSPC), Di stearoylphosphatidylglycerol (DSPG), L-α-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), L-α-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), Polyoxyl 35 castor oil (CREMOPHOR EL, CREMOPHOR ELP), Polyoxyl 40 hydrogenated castor oil (Cremophor RH 40), Polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil (CREMOPHOR RH 60), Polysorbate 20 (TWEEN 20), Polysorbate 80 (TWEEN 80), d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS), Solutol HS-15, Sorbitan monooleate (SPAN 20), PEG 300 caprylic/capric glycerides (SOFTIGEN 767), PEG 400 caprylic/capric glycerides (LABRASOL), PEG 300 oleic glycerides (LABRAFIL M-1944CS), Polyoxyl 35 Castor oil (ETOCAS 35), Glyceryl Caprylate (Mono- and Diglycerides) (IMWITOR), PEG 300 linoleic glycerides (LABRAFIL M-2125CS), Polyoxyl 8 stearate (PEG 400 monosterate), Polyoxyl 40 stearate (PEG 1750 monosterate), and combinations thereof. Additionally, suitable surfactants include, for example, polyoxyethylene derivative of sorbitan monolaurate such as polysorbate, caprylcaproyl macrogol glycerides, polyglycolyzed glycerides, and the like.
According to embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant is selected from one or more of glycerol and polyethylene glycol esters of long chain fatty acids, for example, lauroyl macrogol-32 glycerides or lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides, commercially available as GELUCIRE, including, for example, GELUCIRE 39/01 (glycerol esters of saturated C12-C18 fatty acids), GELUCIRE 43/01 (hard fat NF/JPE) and GELUCIRE 50/13 (stearoyl macrogol-32 glycerides EP, stearoyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides NF, stearoyl polyoxylglycerides (USA FDA IIG)). These surfactants may be used at concentrations greater than about 0.01%, and typically in various amounts of about 0.01%-10.0%, 10.1%-20%, and 20.1%-30%. In some embodiments, surfactants may be used at concentrations of about 1% to about 10% (e.g., about 1% to about 5%, about 2% to about 4%, about 3% to about 8%).
According to embodiments, non-ionic surfactants include, for example and without limitation: one or more of oleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid. According to embodiments, non-ionic surfactants comprise polyethylene sorbitol esters, including polysorbate 80, which is commercially available under the trademark TWEEN® 80 (polysorbate 80) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.). Polysorbate 80 includes approximately 60%-70% oleic acid with the remainder comprising primarily linoleic acids, palmitic acids, and stearic acids. Polysorbate 80 may be used in amounts ranging from about 5 to 50%, and according to embodiments, about 30% of the pharmaceutical composition total mass.
According to embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant includes PEG-6 stearate and ethylene glycol palmitostearate, which are available commercially as TEFOSE® 63 (GATTEFOSSE SAS, Saint-Priest, France), which can be used with, for example, CAPMUL MCM having ratios of MCM to TEFOSE 63 of, for example, 8:2 or 9:1. According to embodiments, other solubilizing agents/non-ionic surfactants combinations include, for example, MIGLYOL 812:GELUCIRE 50/13 or MIGLYOL 812:TEFOSE 63.
According to embodiments, the surfactant can be an anionic surfactant, for example: ammonium lauryl sulfate, dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate, perfluoro-octane sulfonic acid, potassium lauryl sulfate, or sodium stearate. Cationic surfactants are also contemplated.
According to embodiments, non-ionic or anionic surfactants can be used alone with at least one solubilizing agent or can be used in combination with other surfactants. Accordingly, such surfactants, or any other excipient as set forth herein, may be used to solubilize estradiol. The combination of solubilizing agent, surfactant, and other excipients should be designed whereby the estradiol is absorbed into the vaginal tissue. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition will result in minimal vaginal discharge.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further includes at least one thickening agent. Generally, a thickening agent is added when the viscosity of the pharmaceutical composition results less than desirable absorption. According to embodiments, the surfactant(s) disclosed herein may also provide thickening of the pharmaceutical composition that, upon release, will aid the estradiol in being absorbed by the vaginal mucosa while minimizing vaginal discharge. Examples of thickening agents include: hard fats; propylene glycol; a mixture of hard fat EP/NF/JPE, glyceryl ricinoleate, ethoxylated fatty alcohols (ceteth-20, steareth-20) EP/NF (available as OVUCIRE® 3460, GATTEFOSSE, Saint-Priest, France); a mixture of hard fat EP/NF/JPE, glycerol monooleate (type 40) EP/NF (OVUCIRE WL 3264; a mixture of hard fat EP/NF/JPE, glyceryl monooleate (type 40) EP/NF (OVUCIRE WL 2944); a non-ionic surfactant comprising PEG-6 stearate, ethylene glycol palmitostearate, and PEG-32 stearate; TEFOSE 63 or a similar product; and a mixture of various hard fats (WITEPSOL®, Sasol Germany GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Other thickening agents such as the alginates, certain gums such as xanthan gums, agar-agar, iota carrageenans, kappa carrageenans, etc. Several other compounds can act as thickening agents like gelatin, and polymers like HPMC, PVC, and CMCmax According to embodiments, the viscosity of pharmaceutical compositions in accordance with various embodiments may comprise from about 50 cps to about 1000 cps at 25° C. A person of ordinary skill in the art will readily understand and select from suitable thickening agents.
According to embodiments, the thickening agent is a non-ionic surfactant. For example, polyethylene glycol saturated or unsaturated fatty acid ester or diester is the non-ionic surfactant thickening agent. In embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant includes a polyethylene glycol long chain (C16-C20) fatty acid ester and further includes an ethylene glycol long chain fatty acid ester, such as PEG-fatty acid esters or diesters of saturated or unsaturated C16-C18 fatty acids, e.g., oleic, lauric, palmitic, and stearic acids. In embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant includes a polyethylene glycol long chain saturated fatty acid ester and further includes an ethylene glycol long chain saturated fatty acid ester, such as PEG- and ethylene glycol-fatty acid esters of saturated C16-C18 fatty acids, e.g., palmitic and stearic acids. Such non-ionic surfactant can comprise PEG-6 stearate, ethylene glycol palmitostearate, and PEG-32 stearate, such as but not limited to TEFOSE 63.
According to embodiments, TEFOSE 63 is used to provide additional viscosity and/or spreadability in the vagina so as to retard flow of the composition out of the vagina. While the pharmaceutical composition remains liquid, the viscosity of such a pharmaceutical composition causes the liquid to remain in the API absorption area whereby the pharmaceutical composition is substantially absorbed by the tissue. Suprisingly, the addition of an excipient to increase the viscosity and/or spreadability of the pharmaceutical compositions herein allows the administration of a pharmaceutical composition that is liquid at body temperature but does not excessively discharge from the vagina when the patient is standing, which allows the patients to be ambulatory after administration of the pharmaceutical compositions.
According to embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant used as a thickening agent is not hydrophilic and has good emulsion properties. An illustrative example of such surfactant is TEFOSE 63, which has a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of about 9-10.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further includes one or more mucoadherent agents to improve vaginal absorption of the estradiol by, for example, increasing the viscosity of of the pharmaceutical composition whereby flow out of the vagina is retarded. According to other embodiments, alone or in addition to changes in viscosity, the mucoadhesive agent causes the pharmaceutical composition to adhere to the vaginal tissue chemically or mechanically. For example, a mucoadherent agent can be present to aid the pharmaceutical composition with adherence to the mucosa upon activation with water. According to embodiments, polycarbophil is the mucoadherent agent. According to embodiments, other mucoadherent agents include, for example and without limitation: poly (ethylene oxide) polymers having a molecular weight of from about 100,000 to about 900,000; chitosans; carbopols including polymers of acrylic acid crosslinked with allyl sucrose or allyl pentaerythritol; polymers of acrylic acid and C10-C30 alkyl acrylate crosslinked with allyl pentaerythritol; carbomer homopolymer or copolymer that contains a block copolymer of polyethylene glycol and a long chain alkyl acid ester; and the like. According to embodiments, various hydrophilic polymers and hydrogels may be used as the mucoadherent agent. According to certain embodiments, the polymers or hydrogels can swell in response to contact with vaginal tissue or secretions, enhancing moisturizing and mucoadherent effects. The selection and amount of hydrophilic polymer may be based on the selection and amount of solubilizing agent. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes a hydrophilic polymer but optionally excludes a gelling agent. In embodiments having a hydrogel, from about 5% to about 10% of the total mass may comprise the hydrophilic polymer. In further embodiments, hydrogels may be employed. A hydrogel may comprise chitosan, which swell in response to contact with water. In various embodiments, a cream pharmaceutical composition may comprise PEG-90M. In some embodiments, a mucoadherent agent is present in the pharmaceutical formulation, in the soft gel capsule, or both.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions include one or more thermoreversible gels, typically of the hydrophilic nature including for example and without limitation, hydrophilic sucrose and other saccharide-based monomers (U.S. Pat. No. 6,018,033, which is incorporated by reference).
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further includes a lubricant. In some embodiments, a lubricant can be present to aid in formulation of a dosage form. For example, a lubricant may be added to ensure that capsules or tablets do not stick to one another during processing or upon storage. Any suitable lubricant may be used. For example, lecithin, which is a mixture of phospholipids, is the lubricant.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further includes an antioxidant. Any suitable anti-oxidant may be used. For example, butylated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, and Vitamin E TPGS.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes about 20% to about 80% solubilizing agent by weight, about 0.1% to about 5% lubricant by weight, and about 0.01% to about 0.1% antioxidant by weight.
The choice of excipient will depend on factors such as, for example, the effect of the excipient on solubility and stability. Additional excipients used in various embodiments may include colorants and preservatives. Examples of colorants include FD&C colors (e.g., blue No. 1 and Red No. 40), D&C colors (e.g., Yellow No. 10), and opacifiers (e.g., Titanium dioxide). According to embodiments, colorants, comprise about 0.1% to about 2% of the pharmaceutical composition by weight. According to embodiments, preservatives in the pharmaceutical composition comprise methyl and propyl paraben, in a ratio of about 10:1, and at a proportion of about 0.005% and 0.05% by weight.
Generally, the solubilizing agents, excipients, other additives used in the pharmaceutical compositions described herein, are non-toxic, pharmaceutically acceptable, compatible with each other, and maintain stability of the pharmaceutical composition and the various components with respect to each other. Additionally, the combination of various components that comprise the pharmaceutical compositions will maintain will result in the desired therapeutic effect when administered to a subject.
Solubility of Estradiol
According to embodiments, solubilizing agents comprising mixtures of medium chain fatty acid glycerides, e.g., C6-C12, C8-C12, or C8-C10 fatty acid mono- and diglycerides or mono-, di-, and triglycerides dissolve estradiol. As illustrated in the Examples, good results were obtained with solubilizing agents that are predominantly a mixture of C8-C10 saturated fatty acid mono- and diglycerides, or medium chain triglycerides (e.g., MIGLYOL 810 or 812). Longer chain glycerides appear to be not as well suited for dissolution of estradiol.
A solubilizing agent comprising propylene glycol monocaprylate (e.g., CAPRYOL) and 2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethanol (e.g., TRANSCUTOL) solubilized estradiol well.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is prepared via blending estradiol with a pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agent, including for example and without limitation, at least one medium chain fatty acid such as medium chain fatty acids consisting of at least one mono-, di-, or triglyceride, or derivatives thereof, or combinations thereof. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition also includes at least one glycol or derivatives thereof or combinations thereof or combinations of at least one glyceride and glycol. The glycol(s) may be used as solubilizing agents or to adjust viscosity and, thus, may be considered thickening agents, as discussed further herein. Optionally added are other excipients including, for example and without limitation, anti-oxidants, lubricants, and the like. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes sufficient solubilizing agent to fully solubilize the estradiol. It is expressly understood, however, the other volumes of solubilizing agent can be used depending on the level of estradiol solubilization desired. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will know and understand how to determine the volume of solubilizing agent and other excipients depending on the desired percent of estradiol to be solubilized in the pharmaceutical composition.
In illustrative embodiments, GELUCIRE 44/14 (lauroyl macrogol-32 glycerides EP, lauroyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides NF, lauroyl polyoxylglycerides (USA FDA IIG)) is heated to about 65° C. and CAPMUL MCM is heated to about 40° C. to facilitate mixing of the oil and non-ionic surfactant, although such heating is not necessary to dissolve the estradiol.
Specific Examples disclosed herein provide additional principles and embodiments illustrating the manufactures of the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein.
Generally, the pharmaceutical compositions described herein delivered intravaginally inside of a delivery vehicle, for example a capsule. According to embodiments, the capsules are soft capsules made of materials well known in the pharmaceutical arts, for example, gelatin. However, according to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is integral with the pharmaceutical composition (i.e., the pharmaceutical composition is the delivery vehicle). In such embodiments the pharmaceutical compositions is a gel, cream, ointment, tablet, or other preparation that is directly applied and absorbed vaginally.
According to embodiments, the capsules do not contain one or more of the following: a hydrophilic gel-forming bioadhesive agent, a lipophilic agent, a gelling agent for the lipophilic agent, and/or a hydrodispersible agent. According to embodiments, the capsules do not contain a hydrophilic gel-forming bioadhesive agent selected from: carboxyvinylic acid, hydroxypropylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, gelatin, xanthan gum, guar gum, aluminum silicate, and mixtures thereof. According to embodiments, the capsules do not contain a lipophilic agent selected from: a liquid triglyceride, a solid triglyceride (with a melting point of about 35° C.), carnauba wax, cocoa butter, and mixtures thereof. According to embodiments, the capsules do not contain a hydrophobic colloidal silica gelling agent. According to embodiments, the capsules do not contain a hydrodispersible agent selected from: polyoxyethylene glycol, polyoxyethylene glycol 7-glyceryl-cocoate, and mixtures thereof. In some embodiments, the estradiol is formulated as a liquid composition consisting of a therapeutically effective amount of estradiol; a caprylic/capric triglyceride; and a non-ionic surfactant comprising PEG-6 stearate and ethylene glycol palmitostearate. In such embodiments, a hydrophilic gel-forming bioadhesive agent in the liquid composition. In some such embodiments, the liquid composition is contained with a gelatin capsule as described herein. In some such embodiments, the capsule comprises gelatin and optionally one or more further components selected from the group consisting of gelatin, hydrolyzed gelatin, sorbitol-sorbitan solution, water, glycerin, titanium dioxide, FD&C Red #40, ethanol, ethyl acetate, propylene glycol, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, isopropyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, and ammonium hydroxide.
According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is designed for ease of insertion. According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is sized whereby it can be comfortably inserted into the vagina. According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is prepared in a variety of geometries. For example, the delivery vehicle is shaped as a tear drop, a cone with frustoconical end, a cylinder, a cylinder with larger “cap” portion, or other shapes suitable for and that ease insertion into the vagina. According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is used in connection with an applicator. According to other embodiments, the delivery vehicle is inserted digitally.
According to embodiments, a method for the treatment of VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), is provided wherein a composition for the treatment of VVA is digitally insert approximately two inches into the vagina or in the third of the vagina closest to the opening of the vagina and results in at least one of: improved compliance compared to other products for the treatment of VVA; improved user experience compared to other products for the treatment of VVA; and statistically significantly improved symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline within one of two, four, six, eight, ten, or twelve or more weeks after initiation of administration. According to embodiments, a method for the treatment of VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), is provided wherein a delivery vehicle containing a composition for the treatment of VVA and a tear drop shape as disclosed herein is insert approximately two inches into the vagina or in the third of the vagina closest to the opening of the vagina and results in at least one of: improved compliance compared to other products for the treatment of VVA; improved user experience compared to other products for the treatment of VVA; and statistically significantly improved symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline within one of two, four, six, eight, ten, or twelve or more weeks after initiation of administration.
With reference to
According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is designed to remaining in the vagina until the pharmaceutical compositions are released. According to embodiments, delivery vehicle dissolves intravaginally and is absorbed into the vaginal tissue with the pharmaceutical composition, which minimizes vaginal discharge. In such embodiments, delivery mechanism is made from constituents that are non-toxic, for example, gelatin.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is designed to maximize favorable characteristics that lead to patient compliance (patients that discontinue treatment prior to completion of the prescribed course of therapy), without sacrificing efficacy. Favorable characteristics include, for example, lack of or reduction of irritation relative to other hormone replacement pessaries, lack of or reduction in vaginal discharge of the pharmaceutical composition and delivery vehicle relative to other hormone replacement pessaries, lack of or reduction of pharmaceutical composition or delivery vehicle residue inside the vagina, ease of administration compared to other hormone replacement pessaries, or improved efficacy of drug product relative to otherwise similar pharmaceutical compositions.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is non-irritating or minimizes irritation. Patient irritation includes pain, pruritus (itching), soreness, excessive discharge, swelling, or other similar conditions. Patient irritation results in poor compliance. Non-irritating or reduced irritation pharmaceutical compositions are measured relative to competing hormone pessaries, including tablets, creams, or other intravaginal estrogen delivery forms.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions does not result in systemic exposure (e.g., blood circulation of estradiol), which improves safety. According to other embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein result in significantly reduced systemic exposure (e.g., blood circulation of estradiol) when compared to other vaginally administered drugs on the market for the treatment of VVA.
In certain embodiments, the administration of the pharmaceutical composition provides a mean concentration (Cave) value below 20.6 pg/mL on Day 1 of the treatment, and/or a Cave value below 19.4 pg/mL on Day 14 of the treatment, and/or a Cave value below 11.5 pg/mL on Day 83 of the treatment. In certain embodiments, the administration of the pharmaceutical composition provides a mean concentration (Cave) value below 10 pg/mL on Day 1 of the treatment, and/or a Cave value below 7.3 pg/mL on Day 14 of the treatment, and/or a Cave value below 5.5 pg/mL on Day 83 of the treatment.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition does not leave residue inside the vagina. Rather, the pharmaceutical composition and delivery vehicle are substantially absorbed or dispersed without resulting in unabsorbed residue or unpleasant sensations of non-absorbed or non-dispersed drug product. Measurement of lack of residue is relative to other vaginally inserted products or can be measured objectively with inspection of the vaginal tissues. For example, certain other vaginally inserted products contain starch which can result in greater discharge from the vagina following administration than. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions provided herein provide a lower amount, duration, or frequency of discharge following administration compared to other vaginally inserted products (e.g., compressed tablets).
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition improves vaginal discharge compared to other pessaries, including pessaries that deliver hormones. Ideally, vaginal discharge is eliminated, minimized, or improved compared to competing products.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are inserted digitally. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions are digitally inserted approximately two inches into the vagina without a need for an applicator. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions are designed to be also inserted with an applicator, if desired. According to some embodiments, because the site of VVA is in the proximal region of the vagina (towards the vaginal opening), the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are designed to be inserted in the proximal portion of the vagina.
Through extensive experimentation, various medium chain fatty acid esters of glycerol and propylene glycol demonstrated one or more favorable characteristics for development as a human drug product. According to embodiments, the solubilizing agent was selected from at least one of a solvent or co-solvent. Suitable solvents and co-solvents include any mono-, di- or triglyceride and glycols, and combinations thereof.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is delivered via a gelatin capsule delivery vehicle. According to these embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is a liquid pharmaceutical composition. According to embodiments, the delivery vehicle is a soft capsule, for example a soft gelatin capsule. Thus, the pharmaceutical composition of such embodiments is encapsulated in the soft gelatin capsule or other soft capsule.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes estradiol that is at least about 80% solubilized in a solubilizing agent comprising one or more C6 to C14 medium chain fatty acid mono-, di-, or triglycerides and, optionally, a thickening agent. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes estradiol that is at least about 80% solubilized one or more C6 to C12 medium chain fatty acid mono-, di-, or triglycerides, e.g., one or more C6 to C14 triglycerides, e.g., one or more C6 to C12 triglycerides, such as one or more C8-C10 triglycerides. These embodiments specifically contemplate the estradiol being at least 80% solubilized. These embodiments specifically contemplate the estradiol being at least 90% solubilized. These embodiments specifically contemplate the estradiol being at least 95% solubilized. These embodiments specifically contemplate the estradiol being fully solubilized.
As noted above, liquid pharmaceutical compositions are liquid at room temperature or at body temperature. For example, in some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition provided herein is a liquid formulation contained within a soft gel capsule. Gels, hard fats, or other solid forms that are not liquid at room or body temperature are less desirable in embodiments of the pharmaceutical composition that are liquid.
The thickening agent serves to increase viscosity, e.g., up to about 10,000 cP (10,000 mPa-s), typically to no more than about 5000 cP, and more typically to between about 50 and 1000 cP. In embodiments, the non-ionic surfactant, e.g., GELUCIRE or TEFOSE, may be solid at room temperature and require melting to effectively mix with the solubilizing agent. However, in these embodiments, the resultant pharmaceutical composition remains liquid, albeit with greater viscosity, not solid.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes estradiol, the medium chain solubilizing agent, and the thickening agent as the ingredients delivered via a soft capsule delivery vehicle. Other ingredients, e.g., colorants, antioxidants, preservatives, or other ingredients may be included as well. However, the addition of other ingredients should be in amounts that do not materially change the solubility of the estradiol, the pharmacokinetics of the pharmaceutical composition, or efficacy of the pharmaceutical composition. Other factors that should be considered when adjusting the ingredients of the pharmaceutical composition include the irritation, vaginal discharge, intravaginal residue, and other relevant factors, for example those that would lead to reduced patient compliance.
Other contemplated ingredients include: oils or fatty acid esters, lecithin, mucoadherent agents, gelling agents, dispersing agents, or the like.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein can be used for the treatment of VVA, including the treatment of at least one VVA symptom including: vaginal dryness, vaginal or vulvar irritation or itching, dysuria, dyspareunia, and vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity, among others. According to embodiments the methods of treatment are generally applicable to females.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein can be used for the treatment of estrogen-deficient urinary states. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein can be used for the treatment of dyspareunia, or vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity.
According to embodiments, treatment of the VVA, estrogen-deficient urinary states, and dyspareunia and vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity occurs by administering the pharmaceutical compositions intravaginally. According to embodiments where the delivery vehicle is a capsule, the patient obtains the capsule and inserts the capsule into the vagina, where the capsule dissolves and the pharmaceutical composition is released into the vagina where it is absorbed into the vaginal tissue. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is completely absorbed into the vaginal tissue. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is substantially absorbed into the vaginal tissue (e.g., at least about 80% by weight, at least about 85% by weight, at least about 90% by weight, at least about 95% by weight, at least about 97% by weight, at least about 98% by weight, or at least about 99% by weight of the composition is absorbed). According to embodiments, the capsule is inserted about two inches into the vagina, however the depth of insertion is generally any depth that allows for adsorption of substantially all of the pharmaceutical composition. According to embodiments, the capsule can also be applied using an applicator that deposits the capsule at an appropriate vaginal depth as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the capsule is insert into the lower third of the vagina (i.e., the third closest to the vaginal opening). According to embodiments, the softgel capsule can be held with the larger end between the fingers as shown in
The subject will select a position that is most comfortable (e.g., a reclining position as shown in
According to embodiments where the pharmaceutical composition is a cream, gel, ointment, or other similar preparation, the pharmaceutical composition is applied digitally, as is well known and understood in the art.
Upon release of the pharmaceutical composition in the vagina, estradiol is locally absorbed. For example, following administration of the suppository to the proximal region of the vagina of a patient provides a therapeutically effective concentration of estradiol over 24 hours in the proximal region of the vagina.
According to embodiments, the timing of administration of the pharmaceutical composition of this disclosure may be conducted by any safe means as prescribed by an attending physician. According to embodiments, a patient will administer the pharmaceutical composition (e.g., a capsule) intravaginally each day for 14 days, then twice weekly thereafter. In some such embodiments, the doses administered during the twice weekly dosing period are administered approximately 3-4 days apart. Typically, doses administered during the twice weekly dosing period do not exceed more than twice in a seven day period.
According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions are vaginally administered with co-administration of an orally administered estrogen-based (or progestin-based or progestin- and estrogen-based) pharmaceutical drug product, or patch, cream, gel, spray, transdermal delivery system or other parenterally-administered estrogen-based pharmaceutical drug product, each of which can include natural, bio-similar, or synthetic or other derived estrogens or progestins. According to embodiments, modulation of circulating estrogen levels provided via the administration of the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein, if any, are not intended to be additive to any co-administered estrogen product and its associated circulating blood levels. According to other embodiments, co-administrated estrogen products are intended to have an additive effect as would be determined by the patient physician.
According to embodiments, a method for estrogenizing vaginal tissue is provided. The method includes administration of a (i.e., a suppository) or dosage as described herein. Estrogenized vaginal tissue is typically characterized by one or more of the following properties: the presence clear secretions on vaginal walls; rogation and elasticity of the vaginal walls; intact vaginal epithelium; and pink tissue color. In contrast, de-estrogenized vaginal is characterized by decreased or absent secretions; smooth tissue with fewer or no rugae; bleeding of the vaginal surface; development of petechiae (i.e., pinpoint, round spots on the skin due to bleeding, appearing red, brown, or purple); and pale or transparent tissues. Accordingly, estrogenizing vaginal tissue according to the method disclosed herein can include, increasing the level of vaginal secretions in a subject; increasing the number of vaginal rugae in the subject; and/or decreasing bleeding or petechiae in the subject. According to embodiments, a method for estrogenizing vaginal tissue is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for estrogenizing vaginal tissue is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein.
According to embodiments, a method for estrogenizing the labia majora and labia minora (collectively “labia”) is provided as described herein. Generally, the pharmaceutical composition is inserted digitally into the vagina approximately two inches or inserted into the third of the vagina closest to the vaginal opening as shown in
According to embodiments, a method for estrogenizing the vulva is provided as described herein. Generally, the pharmaceutical composition is inserted digitally into the vagina approximately two inches or inserted into the third of the vagina closest to the vaginal opening as shown in
According to embodiments, a method for treating vaginal dryness is provided. The method includes administration of a soft gel vaginal estradiol formulation (i.e., a suppository) or dosage as described herein. Treating vaginal dryness according to the method disclosed herein can include, decreasing the severity of vaginal dryness by 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99%. The decrease in severity can be obtained following 2 weeks of treatment, or 6 weeks of treatment, or 8 weeks of treatment, or 12 weeks of treatment. In some embodiments, vaginal dryness is assessed using a severity scale, ranging from 0 to 4 points wherein 0 indicates no dryness, 1 indicates mild dryness, 2 indicates moderate dryness, and 3 indicates severe dryness.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes reducing the dryness severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes decreasing the severity of dryness after two weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.5-point decrease to a 1.25-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes decreasing the severity of dryness after six weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.75-point decrease to a 1.5-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes decreasing the severity of dryness after eight weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.9-point decrease to a 1.5-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes decreasing the severity of dryness after twelve weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.9-point decrease to a 1.5-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vaginal dryness includes administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating vaginal dryness is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein.
According to embodiments, a method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation is provided. The method includes administration of a soft gel vaginal estradiol formulation (i.e., a suppository) or dosage as described herein. Treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation according to the method disclosed herein can include, decreasing the severity of vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation by 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99%. The decrease in severity can be obtained following 2 weeks of treatment, or 6 weeks of treatment, or 8 weeks of treatment, or 12 weeks of treatment. In some embodiments, vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation is assessed using a severity scale, ranging from 0 to 4 points wherein 0 indicates no itching or irritation, 1 indicates mild itching or irritation, 2 indicates moderate itching or irritation, and 3 indicates severe itching or irritation.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes reducing the itching/irritation severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes decreasing the severity of itching/irritation after two weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.3-point decrease to a 0.6-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes decreasing the severity of itching/irritation after six weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.5-point decrease to a 0.7-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes decreasing the severity of itching/irritation after eight weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.5-point decrease to a 0.8-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes decreasing the severity of itching/irritation after twelve weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.5-point decrease to a 1.0-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation includes administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein.
According to embodiments, a method for treating dyspareunia is provided. The method includes administration of a suppository or dosage as described herein. Treating dyspareunia according to the method disclosed herein can include, decreasing the severity of dyspareunia by 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 99%. The decrease in severity can be obtained following 2 weeks of treatment, or 6 weeks of treatment, or 8 weeks of treatment, or 12 weeks of treatment. In some embodiments, dyspareunia is assessed using a severity scale, ranging from 0 to 4 points wherein 0 indicates no pain associated with sexual activity (with vaginal penetration), 1 indicates mild pain associated with sexual activity (with vaginal penetration), 2 indicates moderate pain associated with sexual activity (with vaginal penetration), and 3 indicates severe pain associated with sexual activity (with vaginal penetration).
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 2 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 6 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 8 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 3, prior to treatment of a subject, to 2, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 2, prior to treatment of a subject, to 1, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject. In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes reducing the dyspareunia severity score from 1, prior to treatment of subject, to 0, after 12 weeks of treatment of the subject.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes decreasing the severity of dyspareunia after two weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 0.9-point decrease to a 1.1-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes decreasing the severity of dyspareunia after six weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 1.3-point decrease to a 1.5-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes decreasing the severity of dyspareunia after eight weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 1.5-point decrease to a 1.8-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes decreasing the severity of dyspareunia after twelve weeks of treatment, wherein the severity is assessed on a scale of 0-3 points, and the average decrease ranges from a 1.5-point decrease to a 1.8-point decrease. The average decrease can be determined by observing any suitable number of subjects. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 100. In some embodiments, the number of subjects is at least 500. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 700 to 800. In some embodiments, the number of subjects ranges from 740 to 750. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 4 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 10 μg of estradiol. In some embodiments, the vaginal estradiol formulation contains 25 μg of estradiol.
In some embodiments, the method for treating dyspareunia includes administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating dyspareunia is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein.
According to embodiments, a method for treating urinary tract infections is provided. As used herein the term “urinary tract infection” refers to an infection of the kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra by a microorganism such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Klebsiella sp., Enterobacter sp., or Proteus sp. The method for treating urinary tract infections generally includes administering a soft gel vaginal estradiol formulation (i.e., a suppository) as described herein. According to certain embodiments, the method further includes decreasing urethral discomfort, frequency or urination, hematuria, dysuria, and/or stress incontinence. According to certain embodiments, a method for treating urinary tract infections is provided, the method including administering a suppository as described herein and decreasing vaginal pH from above 4.5 to between 3.5 and 4.5 (inclusive). The method can be particularly effective for treating urinary tract infections in elderly subjects (e.g., subjects older than 65 years, or older than 75 years, or older than 85 years). According to embodiments, a method for treating urinary tract infections is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating urinary tract infections is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating sexual dysfunction is provided. As used herein with respect to female subjects, the term “sexual dysfunction” generally refers to pain or discomfort during sexual intercourse, diminished vaginal lubrication, delayed vaginal engorgement, increased time for arousal, diminished ability to reach orgasm, diminished clitoral sensation, diminished sexual desire, and/or diminished arousal. According to embodiments, a method for treating sexual dysfunction is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estradiol Cmax or AUC as described herein. According to embodiments, a method for treating sexual dysfunction is provided, the method including administering a suppository so as to provide an estrone Cmax or AUC as described herein.
Sexual function and dysfunction can be assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) (see, Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. “The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A Multidimensional Self-Report Instrument for the Assessment of Female Sexual Function.” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 2000. 26: p. 191-208). The FSFI is useful for assessing various domains of sexual functioning (e.g. sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, satisfaction and pain). Accordingly, the method for treating sexual dysfunction as provided herein can include administering a vaginal soft gel formulation to a subject and increasing a subject's full-scale FSFI score, FSFI-desire score, FSFI-arousal score, FSFI-lubrication score and/or FSFI-orgasm score.
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
FSFI Scoring System
In some embodiments, the method for treating sexual dysfunction includes administering estradiol to the subject and increasing the FSFI-desire score by at least about 20%, or at least about 25%, or at least about 30% as compared to baseline.
In some embodiments, the method for treating sexual dysfunction includes administering estradiol to the subject and increasing the FSFI-arousal score by at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at least about 50% as compared to baseline.
In some embodiments, the method for treating sexual dysfunction includes administering estradiol to the subject and increasing the FSFI-lubrication score by at least about 85%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 115% as compared to baseline.
In some embodiments, the method for treating sexual dysfunction includes administering estradiol to the subject and increasing the FSFI-orgasm score by at least about 40%, or at least about 60% as compared to baseline.
In some embodiments, the method for treating sexual dysfunction includes administering estradiol to the subject and increasing the total FSFI score by at least about 50%, or at least about 55%, or at least about 70% as compared to baseline.
Examples of other metrics for assessment of sexual function include, but are not limited to, Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (“CSFQ”; Clayton et al., Psychopharmacol Bull. 33(4):731-45 (1997) and Clayton et al., Psychopharmacol. Bull. 33(4):747-53 (1997)); the Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning—Self-Report (“DISF-SR”; Derogatis, J Sex Marital Ther. 23:291-304 (1997)); the Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (“GRISS”; Rust et al., Arch. Sex Behav. 15:157-165 (1986)); the Sexual Function Questionnaire (“SFQ”; Quirk et al., J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 11:277-289 (2002)); and the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (“ASEX”; McGahuey et al., J Sex Marital Ther. 26:25-40 (2000)), the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. For assessment using a questionnaire, a measure of sexual dysfunction function is increased when the score in the appropriate domain, subscale or subtest is indicative of sexual dysfunction, as established for that questionnaire. For instance, a female's sexual interest is considered reduced, when assessed using the CSFQ, if the subscale for sexual interest score is less than or equal to 9. Conversely, sexual dysfunction is considered improved when the score in the appropriate domain, subscale or subtest is indicative of higher (e.g., normal or desired) sexual function. For a clinician's assessment, sexual dysfunction may be assessed in comparison to a previous point in time for the patient and/or in comparison to a patient's peers with respect to age, gender, sexual experience, and health, or may also be determined via a validated questionnaire administered by the clinician.
According to embodiments, the efficacy and safety of the pharmaceutical compositions described herein in the treatment of the symptoms of VVA may be determined. According to embodiments, the size, effect, cytology, histology, and variability of the VVA may be determined using various endpoints to determine efficacy and safety of the pharmaceutical compositions described herein or as otherwise accepted in the art, at present or as further developed. One source of endpoints is with the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) published guidelines for treatment of VVA with estradiol.
According to embodiments, a method of treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), is provided that allows a subject to be ambulatory immediately or within minutes after a gelatin capsule containing the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are administered. According to embodiments, a gelatin capsule containing a pharmaceutical composition as disclosed herein is administered by digitally inserting the gelatin capsule containing the pharmaceutical composition into the vagina approximately two inches or inserting into the third of the vagina closest to the vaginal opening as shown in
According to embodiments, a method for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), without causing non-natural discharge (e.g., discharge of a pharmaceutical composition or a component thereof) is provided. According to the method, a soft gelatin capsule is administered containing a liquid pharmaceutical composition that is able to be fully absorbed by the vaginal tissue. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition itself is fully absorbed by the vaginal tissue. According to embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition and gelatin capsule are administered in a volume and size, respectively, that allows a subject's vaginal tissue to fully absorb the pharmaceutical composition. According to embodiments, such absorption will occur contemporaneously with the subject being ambulatory. According to the method, the gelatin capsule and liquid pharmaceutical composition are fully absorved by the vaginal tissue, wherein the only discharge that occurs after estrogenizing the vagina is natural discharge that a woman would have experienced prior to menopause. “Natural” vaginal discharge refers to a small amount of fluid that flows out of the vagina each day, carrying out old cells that have lined the vagina. Natural discharge is usually clear or milky. Non-natural discharge can refer to discharge that is higher in volume than natural discharge, different in color than natural discharge, or different in consistency than natural discharge. Non-natural discharge can also refer to the discharge (e.g., leaking) of a pharmaceutical composition from the vagina.
According to embodiments, a method of treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), using a liquid pharmaceutical composition is provided. According to the method, a soft gelatin capsule containing a liquid composition for treating VVA is provided to a subject. The subject inserts the soft gelatin capsule containing the liquid composition for treating VVA into their vagina either digitally or with an applicator, wherein the soft gelatin capsule dissolves, ruptures, or disintegrates and the liquid composition is released into the vagina. According to embodiments, the liquid composition for treating VVA is a pharmaceutical composition disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the subject inserts the gelatin capsule about two inches into the vagina, or in the third of the vagina closest to the vaginal opening. According to embodiments, the subject is ambulatory immediately after or soon after administration.
According to embodiments, a method is disclosed herein for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), comprising improving the symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline, within two weeks by vaginally administering a composition for the treatment of VVA. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements can be assessed statistically as described herein, and that any improvement can be a statistically significant improvement. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid pharmaceutical composition as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid containing from 1 μg to 25 μg of estradiol. According to embodiments, the method of administration is a method disclosed herein, including the insertion method shown in
According to embodiments, a method is disclosed herein for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), comprising improving the symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline, within four weeks by vaginally administering a composition for the treatment of VVA. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements can be assessed statistically as described herein, and that any improvement can be a statistically significant improvement. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid pharmaceutical composition as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid containing from 1 μg to 25 μg of estradiol. According to embodiments, the method of administration is a method disclosed herein, including the insertion method shown in
According to embodiments, a method is disclosed herein for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), comprising improving the symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline, within eight weeks by vaginally administering a composition for the treatment of VVA. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements can be assessed statistically as described herein, and that any improvement can be a statistically significant improvement. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid pharmaceutical composition as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid containing from 1 μg to 25 μg of estradiol. According to embodiments, the method of administration is a method disclosed herein, including the insertion method shown in
According to embodiments, a method is disclosed herein for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), comprising improving the symptoms of VVA, compared to placebo or baseline, within ten weeks by vaginally administering a composition for the treatment of VVA. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements can be assessed statistically as described herein, and that any improvement can be a statistically significant improvement. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid pharmaceutical composition as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the composition for the treatment of VVA is a liquid containing from 1 μg to 25 μg of estradiol. According to embodiments, the method of administration is a method disclosed herein, including the insertion method shown in
According to embodiments, a method for treating VVA, including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and estrogen-deficient urinary states (including urinary tract infections), comprising administering a composition containing estradiol for the treatment of VVA is provided, wherein the method improves the symptoms of VVA, compared with baseline or placebo, in at least one of two weeks, four weeks, six weeks, eight weeks, or twelve weeks, wherein the estradiol is not detected systemically using standard pharmaceutical pharmacokinetic parameters, such as AUC and Cmax. One of skill in the art will understand that the improvements can be assessed statistically as described herein, and that any improvement can be a statistically significant improvement. According to embodiments, the composition containing estradiol is a liquid composition as disclosed herein. According to embodiments, the copomosition contains 1 μg to 25 μg of estradiol.
According to embodiments, a method for reestrogenizing the vagina, labia, or vulva is provided, wherein the method comprises administering a composition containing estradiol for the treatment of VVA, wherein the composition is a liquid containing estradiol or a synthetic estrogen, and wherein the liquid spreads over a surface area of the vagina, labia, or vulva which is larger than the area covered by a solid composition. For example, the liquid can spread over a surface area ranging from about 50 cm2 to about 120 cm2 (e.g., from about 50 cm2 to about 60 cm2; or from about 60 cm2 to about 70 cm2; or from about 70 cm2 to about 80 cm2; or from about 80 cm2 to about 90 cm2; or from about 90 cm2 to about 100 cm2; or from about 100 cm2 to about 110 cm2; or from about 110 cm2 to about 120 cm2; or from about 65 cm2 to about 110 cm2). According to embodiments, the subject inserts a liquid composition into her vagina in a capsule, such as a hard or soft gelatin capsule, that then dissolves, ruptures, disintegrates, or otherwise releases the liquid in the vagina. According to embodiments, the liquid contains at least one of a bio-adhesive or viscosity enhancer to prevent the liquid from discharging from the vagina before the estradiol or synthetic estrogen can be absorbed into the vaginal tissue in a dose sufficient to effect reestrongenization of the vagina. According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within two weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels. According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within four weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels.
According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within six weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels. According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within eight weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels. According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within ten weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels. According to embodiments, the vagina will be statistically significantly reestrogenized within twelve or more weeks of administration compared to baseline or placebo levels.
According to embodiments, administration of the pharmaceutical compositions described herein resulted in treatment of the VVA, as well as improvement of one or more of the associated symptoms. Patients with VVA experience shrinking of the vaginal canal in both length and diameter and the vaginal canal has fewer glycogen-rich vaginal cells to maintain moisture and suppleness. In addition, the vaginal wall can become thin, pale, dry, or sometimes inflamed (atrophic vaginitis). These changes can manifest as a variety of symptoms collectively referred to as VVA. Such symptoms include, without limitations, an increase in vaginal pH; reduction of vaginal epithelial integrity, vaginal secretions, or epithelial surface thickness; pruritus; vaginal dryness; dyspareunia (pain or bleeding during sexual intercourse); urinary tract infections; or a change in vaginal color. According to embodiments, efficacy is measured as a reduction of vulvar and vaginal atrophy in a patient back to premenopausal conditions. According to embodiments, the change is measured as a reduction in the severity of one or more atrophic effects measured at baseline (screening, Day 1) and compared to a measurement taken at Day 15 (end of treatment). Severity of the atrophic effect may be measured using a scale of 0 to 3 where, for example, none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, or severe=3. Such scoring is implemented to evaluate the pre-treatment condition of patients; to determine the appropriate course of a treatment regime; such as dosage, dosing frequency, and duration, among others; and post-treatment outcomes.
One of the symptoms of VVA is increased vaginal pH. In further aspects of this disclosure, treatment with the pharmaceutical compositions described herein resulted in a decrease in vaginal pH. A decrease in vaginal pH is measured as a decrease from the vaginal pH at baseline (screening) to the vaginal pH at Day 15, according to embodiments. In some embodiments, a pH of 5 or greater may be associated with VVA. In some embodiments, pH is measured using a pH indicator strip placed against the vaginal wall. In some embodiments, a change in vaginal pH is a change in a patient's vaginal pH to a pH of less than about pH 5.0. In some embodiments, a subject's vaginal pH may be less than about pH 4.9, pH 4.8, pH 4.7, pH 4.6, pH 4.5, pH 4.4, pH 4.3, pH 4.2, pH 4.1, pH 4.0, pH 3.9, pH 3.8, pH 3.7, pH 3.6, or pH 3.5.
According to embodiments, treatment with the pharmaceutical compositions described herein resulted in improvements in the vaginal Maturation Index. The Maturation Index is measured as a change in cell composition. According to embodiments and as related to VVA, a change in cell composition is measured as the change in percent of composition or amount of parabasal vaginal cells, intermediate cells, and superficial vaginal cells, such as a change in the composition or amount of parabasal vaginal cells compared with or, relative to, a change in superficial vaginal cells. A subject having VVA symptoms often has an increased number of parabasal cells and a reduced number of superficial cells (e.g., less than about 5%) compared with women who do not suffer from VVA. Conversely, a subject having decreasing VVA symptoms, or as otherwise responding to treatment, may demonstrate an improvement in the Maturation Index, specifically a decrease in the amount of parabasal cells or an increase in the amount of superficial cells compared to baseline (screening). In embodiments, a decrease in parabasal cells is measured as a reduction in the percent of parabasal cells; the percent reduction may be at least about an 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60%, 55%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15% or 10% reduction in the number of parabasal cells. In embodiments, a percent reduction may be at least about a 54% reduction in the number of parabasal cells. In embodiments, an increase in superficial cells is measured as an increase in the percent of superficial cells; the percent increase in superficial cells may be at least about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, or 50% increase in the number of superficial cells. In further embodiments, a percent increase may be at least about a 35% increase in the number of superficial cells.
In some embodiments, an improvement in the Maturation Index is assessed as a change over time. For example, as a change in cell composition measured at a baseline (screening) at Day 1 compared to the cell composition measured at Day 15. The change in cell composition may also be assessed as a change in the amount of parabasal cells over time, optionally in addition to measuring changes in parabasal cells and superficial cells as described above. Such cells may be obtained from the vaginal mucosal epithelium through routine gynecological examination and examined by means of a vaginal smear.
In various further aspects of this disclosure, treatment with the pharmaceutical compositions described herein resulted in any of: an increase in superficial cells; a decrease in parabasal cells; and an increase in intermediate cells.
In further aspects of this disclosure, samples may be collected to determine hormone levels, in particular, estradiol levels. In some embodiments, blood samples may be taken from a subject and the level of estradiol measured (pg/mL). In some embodiments, estradiol levels may be measured at 0 hours (for example, at time of first treatment), at 1 hour (for example, post first treatment), at 3 hours, and at 6 hours. In some embodiments, samples may be taken at day 8 (for example, post first treatment) and at day 15 (for example, one day post the last treatment on day 14). In some embodiments, descriptive statistics of plasma estradiol concentrations at each sampling time and observed Cmax and Tmax values may be measured and the AUC calculated.
In some embodiments, a suppository can comprise about 25 μg of estradiol. In such cases, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, parameters including one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 19 pg/mL to about 29 pg/mL (e.g., 19.55 pg/mL to about 28.75 pg/mL); or 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 75 pg*hr/mL to about 112 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 75.82 pg*hr/mL to about 111.50). In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 9 pg/mL to about 14 pg/mL (e.g., 9.17 pg/mL to about 13.49 pg/mL); and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 43 pg*hr/mL to about 65 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 43.56 pg*hr/mL to about 64.06 pg*hr/mL). In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, provides one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 416 pg/mL to about 613 pg/mL (e.g., 416.53 pg/mL to about 612.55 pg/mL); and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0_24 of estrone sulfate of about 3598 pg*hr/mL to about 5291 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 3598.04 pg*hr/mL to about 5291.24 pg*hr/mL).
In some embodiments, a suppository includes about 25 μg of estradiol. In some such embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, parameters including one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 20.9 pg/mL to about 32.8 pg/mL (e.g., 20.96 pg/mL to about 32.75 pg/mL); 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 104.3 pg/mL to about 163.1 pg/mL (e.g., 104.32 pg/mL to about 163.0 pg/mL); and 3) an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol ranging from about 4.3 pg/mL to about 6.8 pg/mL (e.g., 4.32 pg/mL to about 6.75 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, parameters including one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 26.2 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 130 pg/mL; and 3) an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol of about 5.4 pg/mL, as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, parameters including one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 9.5 pg/mL to about 15.1 pg/mL (e.g., 9.60 pg/mL to about 15.00 pg/mL); 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 67.6 pg/mL to about 105.8 pg/mL (e.g., 67.68 pg/mL to about 105.75 pg/mL); and 3) an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol ranging from about 2.7 pg/mL to about 4.4 pg/mL (e.g., 2.80 pg/mL to about 4.38 pg/mL) of estradiol as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, parameters including one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 12.0 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 84.6 pg/mL; and 3) an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol of about 3.5 pg/mL, as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 158.8 pg/mL to about 248.3 pg/mL (e.g., 158.88 hr/mL to about 248.25 pg/mL); and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 1963.1 pg*hr/mL to about 3067.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 1963.20 pg*hr/mL to about 3067.50 pg*hr/mL) as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates of about 198.6 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates of about 2454 pg*hr/mL as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 173.5 pg*hr/mL to about 271.3 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 173.60 pg*hr/mL to about 271.25 pg*hr/mL; or about 217 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 7.2 pg/mL to about 11.4 pg/mL (e.g., from 7.25 pg/mL to about 11.33 pg/mL; or about 9.06 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 137.5 pg*hr/mL to about 215.1 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 137.60 pg*hr/mL to about 215.00 pg*hr/mL; or about 172 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 5.7 pg/mL to about 9.0 pg/mL (e.g., from 5.72 pg/mL to about 8.94 pg/mL; or about 7.15 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 335.1 pg*hr/mL to about 523.8 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 335.20 pg*hr/mL to about 523.75 pg*hr/mL; or about 419 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 13.9 pg/mL to about 21.9 pg/mL (e.g., from 14.00 pg/mL to about 21.88 pg/mL; or about 17.5 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 343.1 pg*hr/mL to about 536.2 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 343.20 pg*hr/mL to about 536.25 pg*hr/mL; or about 429 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 14.3 pg/mL to about 22.4 pg/mL (e.g., from 14.32 pg/mL to about 22.38 pg/mL; or about 17.9 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 25 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 7,300.7 pg*hr/mL to about 11,407.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 7,300.80 pg*hr/mL to about 11,407.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 9,126 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 303.9 pg/mL to about 475.1 pg/mL (e.g., from 304.00 pg/mL to about 475.00 pg/mL; or about 380 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 7,943.9 pg*hr/mL to about 12,412.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 7,944.00 pg*hr/mL to about 12,412.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 9,930 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 331.1 pg/mL to about 517.4 pg/mL (e.g., from 331.20 pg/mL to about 517.50 pg/mL; or about 414 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, a suppository can comprise about 10 μg of estradiol. In such cases, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 12 pg/mL to about 18 pg/mL (e.g., 12.22 pg/mL to about 17.98 pg/mL); 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 42 pg*hr/mL to about 63 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 42.18 pg*hr/mL to about 62.02 pg*hr/mL); and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estradiol of about 1 hrs to about 3 hrs (e.g., 1.49 hrs to about 2.19 hrs). In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 4 pg/mL to about 7 pg/mL (e.g., 4.38 pg/mL to about 6.44 pg/mL); 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 20 pg*hr/mL to about 31 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 20.60 pg*hr/mL to about 30.30 pg*hr/mL); and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone of about 4 hrs to about 8 hrs (e.g., 4.99 hrs to about 7.34 hrs). In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 10 pg/mL to about 16 pg/mL (e.g., 10.34 pg/mL to about 15.20 pg/mL); 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate of about 56 pg*hr/mL to about 84 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 56.61 pg*hr/mL to about 83.25 pg*hr/mL); and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone sulfate of about 4 hrs to about 7 hrs (e.g., 4.67 hrs to about 6.86 hrs).
In some embodiments, a suppository includes about 10 μg of estradiol. In some such embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 4.7 pg/mL to about 7.6 pg/mL (e.g., 4.80 pg/mL to about 7.50 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 2.3 pg/mL to about 3.8 pg/mL (e.g., 2.40 pg/mL to about 3.75 pg/mL) of estradiol as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 6.0 pg/mL, as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 3.0 pg/mL, as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 17.5 pg/mL to about 27.4 pg/mL (e.g., 17.52 pg*hr/mL to about 27.37 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 10.9 pg*hr/mL to about 17.2 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 10.96 pg*hr/mL to about 17.13 pg*hr/mL) of estradiol as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 21.9 pg*hr/mL, as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 13.7 pg*hr/mL, as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol ranging from about 0.6 pg/mL to about 1.1 pg/mL (e.g., 0.64 pg/mL to about 1.0 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol ranging from about 0.1 pg/mL to about 0.3 pg/mL (e.g., 0.16 pg/mL to about 0.25 pg/mL) of estradiol as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol of about 0.8 pg/mL, as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, an average concentration (Cavg) of estradiol of about 0.2 pg/mL, as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 72.1 pg/mL to about 112.8 pg/mL (e.g., 72.16 pg/mL to about 112.75 pg/mL); and 2) an average concentration (Cavg) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 6.3 pg/mL to about 10.1 pg/mL (e.g., 6.40 pg/mL to about 10.00 pg/mL) as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates of about 90.2 pg/mL; and 2) an average concentration (Cavg) of estrone conjugates of about 8.0 pg/mL, as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 110.3 pg*hr/mL to about 172.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 110.40 pg*hr/mL to about 172.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 138 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 4.6 pg/mL to about 7.8 pg/mL (e.g., from 4.61 pg/mL to about 7.20 pg/mL; or about 5.76 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 87.9 pg*hr/mL to about 137.4 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 88.00 pg*hr/mL to about 137.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 110 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 3.6 pg/mL to about 5.8 pg/mL (e.g., from 3.67 pg/mL to about 5.74 pg/mL; or about 4.59 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 370.3 pg*hr/mL to about 578.8 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 370.40 pg*hr/mL to about 578.75 pg*hr/mL; or about 463 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 15.4 pg/mL to about 24.2 pg/mL (e.g., from 15.44 pg/mL to about 24.13 pg/mL; or about 19.3 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 371.1 pg*hr/mL to about 580.1 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 371.20 pg*hr/mL to about 580.00 pg*hr/mL; or about 464 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 15.4 pg/mL to about 24.2 pg/mL (e.g., from 15.44 pg/mL to about 24.13 pg/mL; or about 19.3 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 4,745.5 pg*hr/mL to about 7,414.9 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 4,745.60 pg*hr/mL to about 7,415.00 pg*hr/mL; or about 5,932 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 197.5 pg/mL to about 308.8 pg/mL (e.g., from 197.60 pg/mL to about 308.75 pg/mL; or about 247 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 7,182.3 pg*hr/mL to about 11,222.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 7,182.40 pg*hr/mL to about 11,222.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 8,978 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 299.1 pg/mL to about 467.6 pg/mL (e.g., from 299.20 pg/mL to about 467.50 pg/mL; or about 374 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, a suppository can comprise about 4 μg of estradiol. In such cases, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 4 pg/mL to about 8 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 16 pg*hr/mL to about 26 pg*hr/mL; and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estradiol of about 0.25 hrs to about 2 hrs. In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone of about 1 pg/mL to about 3 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone of about 8 pg*hr/mL to about 13 pg*hr/mL; and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone of about 1 hrs to about 4 hrs. In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate of about 4 pg/mL to about 7 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate of about 22 pg/mL to about 34 pg/mL; and 3) a corrected geometric mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of estrone sulfate of about 1 hrs to about 3 hrs.
In some embodiments, a suppository includes about 4 μg of estradiol. In some such embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 2.0 pg/mL to about 3.3 pg/mL (e.g., 2.08 pg/mL to about 3.25 pg/mL); and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 9.5 pg*hr/mL to about 15.1 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 9.60 pg*hr/mL to about 15.0 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol ranging from about 1.0 pg/mL to about 1.7 pg/mL (e.g., 1.04 pg/mL to about 1.63 pg/mL) of estradiol, and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 5.7 pg*hr/mL to about 9.1 pg*hr/mL (e.g., 5.76 pg*hr/mL to about 9.0 pg*hr/mL).
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 2.6 pg/mL; and 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 12 pg*hr/mL, as assessed at day 1. In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 10 μg of estradiol to a patient can provide, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol of about 1.3 pg/mL; 2) a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol of about 7.2 pg*hr/mL, as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 0.3 pg/mL to about 0.5 pg/mL (e.g., 0.32 pg/mL to about 0.5 pg/mL) as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone conjugates of about 0.4 pg/mL as assessed at day 1.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 73.3 pg*hr/mL to about 114.7 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 73.36 pg*hr/mL to about 114.63 pg*hr/mL; or about 91.7 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 3.1 pg/mL to about 4.8 pg/mL (e.g., from 3.14 pg/mL to about 4.90 pg/mL; or about 3.92 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol ranging from about 69.7 pg*hr/mL to about 108.9 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 69.76 pg*hr/mL to about 109.00 pg*hr/mL; or about 87.2 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estradiol ranging from about 2.8 pg/mL to about 4.6 pg/mL (e.g., from 2.90 pg/mL to about 4.54 pg/mL; or about 3.63 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 231.9 pg*hr/mL to about 362.4 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 232.00 pg*hr/mL to about 362.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 290 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 10.3 pg/mL to about 16.3 pg/mL (e.g., from 10.40 pg/mL to about 16.25 pg/mL; or about 13 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone ranging from about 261.5 pg*hr/mL to about 408.8 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 261.60 pg*hr/mL to about 408.75 pg*hr/mL; or about 327 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone ranging from about 10.8 pg/mL to about 17.1 pg/mL (e.g., from 10.88 pg/mL to about 17.00 pg/mL; or about 13.6 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
In some embodiments, administration of a suppository comprising about 4 μg of estradiol to a patient provides, in a plasma sample from the patient, one or more parameters selected from: 1) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 4,062.3 pg*hr/mL to about 6,347.6 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 4,062.40 pg*hr/mL to about 6,347.50 pg*hr/mL; or about 5,078 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 1; 2) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 172.7 pg/mL to about 270.1 pg/mL (e.g., from 172.80 pg/mL to about 270.00 pg/mL; or about 216 pg/mL), as assessed at day 1; 3) an unadjusted arithmetic mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone conjugates ranging from about 4,138.3 pg*hr/mL to about 6,466.3 pg*hr/mL (e.g., from 4,138.40 pg*hr/mL to about 6,466.25 pg*hr/mL; or about 5173 pg*hr/mL), as assessed at day 14; and 4) a corrected arithmetic mean peak plasma concentration (Cavg[0-24]) of estrone conjugates ranging from about 172.7 pg/mL to about 270.1 pg/mL (e.g., from 172.80 pg/mL to about 270.00 pg/mL; or about 216 pg/mL), as assessed at day 14.
A pharmaceutical composition provided herein can result in substantially local delivery of estradiol. For example, plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate measured in the plasma of a patient following administration of a pharmaceutical composition as provided herein be statistically similar to those measured following administration of a placebo formulation (i.e., a similar formulation lacking the estradiol). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, or estrone sulfate measured following administration of a pharmaceutical composition provided herein may be low compared to RLD formulations.
In some embodiments, a suppository can include about 1 μg to about 25 μg of estradiol. Upon administration the suppository to a patient, a plasma sample from the patient can provide a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol that is less than about 30 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estradiol that is less than about 18 pg/mL. In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol that is less than about 112 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estradiol that is less than about 63 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone that is less than about 14 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone that is less than about 7 pg/mL. In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone that is less than about 65 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone that is less than about 31 pg*hr/mL.
In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate that is less than about 613 pg/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of estrone sulfate that is less than about 16 pg/mL. In some embodiments, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate that is less than about 5291 pg*hr/mL. For example, administration of the suppository to a patient provides a corrected geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-24 of estrone sulfate that is less than about 84 pg*hr/mL.
In further aspects of this disclosure, capsule disintegration may be determined. In some embodiments, delivery vehicle disintegration or absorption (presence or absence of the delivery vehicle after administration) at day 1 of treatment (for example, at 6 hours post first treatment) and at day 15 (for example, one day post the last treatment on day 14).
The pharmaceutical compositions can be formulated as described herein to provide desirable pharmacokinetic parameters in a subject (e.g., a female subject) to whom the composition is administered. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein produces desirable pharmacokinetic parameters for estradiol in the subject. In some embodiments, a pharmaceutical composition as described herein produces desirable pharmacokinetic parameters for one or more metabolites of estradiol in the subject, for example, estrone or total estrone.
Following the administration of a composition comprising estradiol to a subject, the concentration and metabolism of estradiol can be measured in a sample (e.g., a blood, serum, or plasma sample) from the subject. Estradiol is typically converted reversibly to estrone, and both estradiol and estrone can be converted to the metabolite estriol. In postmenopausal women, a significant proportion of circulating estrogens exist as sulfate conjugates, especially estrone sulfate. Thus, estrone can be measured with respect to “estrone” amounts (excluding conjugates such as estrone sulfate) and “total estrone” amounts (including both free, or unconjugated, estrone and conjugated estrone such as estrone sulfate).
The pharmaceutical compositions of this disclosure can be characterized for one or more pharmacokinetic parameters of estradiol or a metabolite thereof following administration of the composition to a subject or to a population of subjects. These pharmacokinetic parameters include AUC, Cmax, Cavg, and Tmax. AUC is a determination of the area under the curve (AUC) plotting the blood, serum, or plasma concentration of drug along the ordinate (Y-axis) against time along the abscissa (X-axis). AUCs are well understood, frequently used tools in the pharmaceutical arts and have been extensively described. Cmax is well understood in the art as an abbreviation for the maximum drug concentration in blood, serum, or plasma of a subject. Tmax is well understood in the art as an abbreviation for the time to maximum drug concentration in blood, serum, or plasma of a subject.
In some embodiments, one or more pharmacokinetic parameters, e.g., AUC, Cmax, Cavg, or Tmax, is measured for estradiol. In some embodiments, one or more pharmacokinetic parameters, e.g., AUC, Cmax, Cavg, or Tmax, is measured for estrone. In some embodiments, one or more pharmacokinetic parameters, e.g., AUC, Cmax, Cavg, or Tmax, is measured for total estrone. Any pharmacokinetic parameter can be a “corrected” parameter, wherein the parameter is determined as a change over a baseline level.
Any of a variety of methods can be used for measuring the levels of estradiol, estrone, or total estrone in a sample, including immunoassays, mass spectrometry (MS), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet fluorescent detection, liquid chromatography in conjunction with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). In some embodiments, the levels of estradiol, estrone, or total estrone are measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Methods of measuring hormone levels are well described in the literature.
Statistical Measurements
According to embodiments, pharmacokinetics of the pharmaceutical composition disclosed herein are measured using statistical analysis. According to embodiments, Analysis of Variance (“ANOVA”) or Analysis of CoVariance (“ANCOVA”) are used to evaluate differences between a patient receiving treatment with a pharmaceutical composition comprising an active pharmaceutical composition (for example, a pharmaceutical composition comprising estradiol) and a patient receiving treatment with a placebo (for example, the same pharmaceutical composition but without estradiol) or a reference drug. A person of ordinary skill in the art will understand how to perform statistical analysis of the data collected.
The following examples are of pharmaceutical compositions, delivery vehicles, and combinations thereof. Methods of making are also disclosed. Data generated using the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein are also disclosed.
In embodiments, estradiol is procured and combined with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agents. The estradiol is purchased as a pharmaceutical grade ingredient, often as micronized estradiol, although other forms can also be used. In embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes estradiol in a dosage strength of from about 1 μg to about 50 μg. In embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes 10 μg of estradiol. In embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition includes 25 μg of estradiol.
In embodiments, the estradiol is combined with pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agents, and, optionally, other excipients, to form a pharmaceutical composition. In embodiments, the solubilizing agent is one or more of CAPMUL MCM, MIGLYOL 812, GELUCIRE 39/01, GELUCIRE 43/01, GELUCIRE 50/13, and TEFOSE 63.
GELUCIRE 39/01 and GELUCIRE 43/01 each have an HLB value of 1. GELUCIRE 50/13 has an HLB value of 13. TEFOSE 63 has an HLB value of between 9 and 10.
Various combinations of pharmaceutically acceptable solubilizing agents were combined with estradiol and examined as shown in Table 1.
Pharmaceutical compositions in Table 1 that were liquid or semisolid at room temperature were tested using a Brookfield viscometer (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Middleboro, Mass.) at room temperature. Pharmaceutical compositions appearing in Table 1 that were solid at ambient temperature were tested using a Brookfield viscometer at 37° C.
Pharmaceutical compositions appearing in Table 1 that were solid at room temperature were assessed at 37° C. to determine their melting characteristics. The viscosity of the gels can be important during encapsulation of the formulation. For example, in some cases, it is necessary to warm the formulation prior to filing of the gelatin capsules. In addition, the melting characteristics of the composition can have important implications following administration of the formulation into the body. For example, in some embodiments, the formulation will melt at temperatures below about 37° C. Pharmaceutical Composition 11 (Capmul MCM/Tefose 63), for example, did not melt at 37° C. or 41° C.
A dispersion assessment of the pharmaceutical compositions appearing in Table 1 was performed. The dispersion assessment was performed by transferring 300 mg of each vehicle system in 100 mL of 37° C. water, without agitation, and observing for mixing characteristics. Results varied from formation of oil drops on the top to separation of phases to uniform, but cloudy dispersions. Generally speaking, it is believed that formulations able to readily disperse in aqueous solution will have better dispersion characteristics upon administration. It was surprisingly found, however, as shown below in Examples 7-9, that formulations that did not readily disperse in aqueous solution (e.g., Formulation 13) and instead formed two phases upon introduction to the aqueous solution were found to be the most effective when administered to the human body.
In embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is delivered in a gelatin capsule delivery vehicle. The gelatin capsule delivery vehicle includes, for example, gelatin (e.g., Gelatin, NF (150 Bloom, Type B)), hydrolyzed collagen (e.g., GELITA®, GELITA AG, Eberbach, Germany), glycerin, sorbitol special, or other excipients in proportions that are well known and understood by persons of ordinary skill in the art. Sorbitol special may be obtained commercially and may tend to act as a plasticizer and humectant.
A variety of delivery vehicles were developed, as show in Table 2, Gels A through F. In Table 2, each delivery vehicle A through F differs in the proportion of one or more components.
Each delivery vehicle A through F was prepared at a temperature range from about 45° C. to about 85° C. Each molten delivery vehicle A through F was cast into a film, dried, and cut into strips. The strips were cut into uniform pieces weighing about 0.5 g, with about 0.5 mm thickness. Strips were placed into a USP Type 2 dissolution vessel in either water or pH 4 buffer solution and the time for them to completely dissolve was recorded (see Table 2). Delivery vehicle A had the fastest dissolution in both water and pH 4 buffer solution.
Various combinations of the pharmaceutical compositions from Table 1 and from Table 2 were prepared. The combinations are shown in Table 3.
Each aliquot of the pharmaceutical compositions of Table 3 about 300 mg to about 310 mg. Batch size was as listed in Table 3. To encapsulate the vehicle system, each 300 mg to about 310 mg pharmaceutical composition aliquot was encapsulated in about 200 mg of the gelatin capsule delivery vehicle. Thus, for example, in Trial 1, the pharmaceutical composition denoted by MCM: 39/01 was encapsulated in gelatin capsule delivery vehicle A for a total encapsulated weight of about 500 mg to about 510 mg. The aliquot size is arbitrary depending on the concentration of the estradiol and the desired gelatin capsule delivery vehicle size. Artisans will readily understand how to adjust the amount of estradiol in the pharmaceutical composition to accommodate a given size of delivery vehicle, when the delivery vehicle encapsulates the pharmaceutical composition.
In various experiments, solubilizing agents were tested to determine whether they were able to solubilize 2 mg of estradiol for a total pharmaceutical composition weight of 100 mg. The solubilizing agents were considered suitable if estradiol solubility in the solubilizing agent was greater than or equal to about 20 mg/g. Initial solubility was measured by dissolving micronized estradiol into various solubilizing agents until the estradiol was saturated (the estradiol/solubilizing agent equilibrated for three days), filtering the undissolved estradiol, and analyzing the resulting pharmaceutical composition for estradiol concentration by HPLC.
The following pharmaceutical compositions are contemplated.
Gel Mass
In the Examples below, TX-004HR is Pharmaceutical Compositions 4, 5, and 6 (TX-004HR 4 μg, TX-004HR 10 μg, and TX-004HR 25 μg) compared to Pharmaceutical Composition 7.
In operation 104, GELUCIRE is mixed with the CapmulMCM to form the finished solubilizing agent. As used herein, any form of GELUCIRE may be used in operation 104. For example, one or more of GELUCIRE 39/01, GELUCIRE 43/01, GELUCIRE 50/13 may be used in operation 104. Mixing is performed as would be known to persons of ordinary skill in the art, for example by impeller, agitator, stirrer, or other like devices used to mix pharmaceutical compositions. Operation 104 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas. Mixing may be performed in any vessels that are known to persons of ordinary skill in the art, such as a stainless steel vessel or a steel tank.
In operation 106 estradiol is mixed into the solubilizing agent. In embodiments, the estradiol in micronized when mixed into the solubilizing agent. In other embodiments, the estradiol added is in a non-micronized form. Mixing may be facilitated by an impeller, agitator, stirrer, or other like devices used to mix pharmaceutical compositions. Operation 106 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas.
In embodiments, however, the addition of estradiol may be performed prior to operation 104. In that regard, operations 104 and 106 are interchangeable with respect to timing or can be performed contemporaneously with each other.
In operation 110, the gelatin delivery vehicle is prepared. Any of the gelatin delivery vehicles described herein may be used in operation 110. In embodiments, gelatin, hydrolyzed collagen, glycerin, and other excipients are combined at a temperature range from about 45° C. to about 85° C. and prepared as a film. Mixing may occur in a steel tank or other container used for preparing gelatin delivery vehicles. Mixing may be facilitated by an impellor, agitator, stirrer, or other devices used to combine the contents of gelatin delivery vehicles. Operation 110 may be performed under an inert or relatively inert gas atmosphere, such as nitrogen gas. In embodiments, the gelatin delivery vehicle mixture is degassed prior to being used to encapsulate the pharmaceutical composition.
In operation 112, the gelatin delivery vehicle encapsulates the pharmaceutical composition, according to protocols well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. In operation 112, a soft gelatin capsule delivery vehicle is prepared by combining the pharmaceutical composition made in operation 106 with the gelatin delivery vehicle made in operation 110. The gelatin may be wrapped around the material, partially or fully encapsulating it or the gelatin can also be injected or otherwise filled with the pharmaceutical composition made in operation 106.
In embodiments, operation 112 is completed in a suitable die to provide a desired shape. Vaginal soft gel capsules may be prepared in a variety of geometries. For example, vaginal soft gel capsules may be shaped as a tear drop, a cone with frustoconical end, a cylinder, a cylinder with larger “cap” portion as illustrated in
The objective of this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a pharmaceutical composition comprising 10 μg estradiol (i.e., Pharmaceutical Composition 2) in treating moderate to severe symptoms of VVA associated with menopause after 14 days of treatment, and to estimate the effect size and variability of vulvovaginal atrophy endpoints. In addition, the systemic exposure to estradiol from single and multiple doses of the pharmaceutical composition was investigated.
This study was a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of the pharmaceutical composition in reducing moderate to severe symptoms of vaginal atrophy associated with menopause and to investigate the systemic exposure to estradiol following once daily intravaginal administrations of a pharmaceutical composition for 14 days.
Postmenopausal subjects who met the study entry criteria were randomized to one of two treatment groups (pharmaceutical composition or placebo). During the screening period subjects were asked to self-assess the symptoms of VVA, including vaginal dryness, vaginal or vulvar irritation or itching, dysuria, vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, and vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity. Subjects with at least one self-assessed moderate to severe symptom of VVA identified by the subject as being most bothersome to her were eligible to participate in the study.
Clinical evaluations were performed at the following time points:
Screening Period (up to 28 days);
Visit 1—Randomization/Baseline (day 1);
Visit 2—Interim (day 8); and
Visit 3—End of the treatment (day 15).
Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either pharmaceutical composition comprising estradiol 10 μg or a matching placebo vaginal softgel capsule, and self-administered their first dose of study medication at the clinical facility under the supervision of the study personnel. Serial blood samples for monitoring of estradiol level were collected at 0.0, 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0 hours relative to first dose administration on day 1. Subjects remained at the clinical site until completion of the 6-hour blood draw and returned to clinical facility for additional single blood draws for measurement of estradiol concentration on day 8 (before the morning dose) and day 15. Subjects were provided with enough study medication until the next scheduled visit and were instructed to self-administer their assigned study treatment once a day intravaginally at approximately the same time (±1 hour) every morning. Each subject was provided with a diary in which she was required to daily record investigational drug dosing dates and times. Subjects returned to clinical facility on day 8 for interim visit and on day 15 for end of treatment assessments and post study examinations. Capsule disintegration state was assessed by the investigator at day 1 (6 hours post-dose) and day 15.
The study involved a screening period of up to 28 days before randomization and treatment period of 14 days. Selection of dosage strength (estradiol 10 μg) and treatment regimen (once daily for two weeks) was based on the FDA findings on safety and efficacy of the RLD.
Number of Subjects (Planned and Analyzed)
Up to 50 (25 per treatment group) postmenopausal female subjects 40 to 75 years old with symptoms of moderate to severe VVA were randomized. 50 subjects were enrolled, 48 subjects completed the study, and 48 subjects were analyzed.
Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion
Fifty female subjects were enrolled in the study. Post-menopausal female subjects 40 to 75 years of age, with a mean age was 62.3 years were enrolled. Subjects' mean weight (kg) was 71.2 kg with a range of 44.5-100 kg. Subjects' mean height (cm) was 162.6 cm with a range of 149.9-175.2 cm, and the mean BMI (kg/m2) was 26.8 kg/m2 with a range of 19-33 kg/m2. Criteria of inclusion in the study included: self-identification of at least one moderate to severe symptom of VVA, for example, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, vaginal or vulvar irritation, burning, or itching, dysuria, vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity, that was identified by the subject as being most bothersome to her; ≤5% superficial cells on vaginal smear cytology; vaginal pH>5.0; and estradiol level ≤50 pg/mL. Subject who were judged as being in otherwise generally good health on the basis of a pre-study physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, pelvic examination, and mammography were enrolled.
Estradiol 10 μs or Placebo, Dose, and Mode of Administration
Subjects were randomly assigned (in 1:1 allocation) to self-administer one of the following treatments intravaginally once daily for 14 days:
The estradiol formulation was a tear drop shaped light pink soft gel capsule. Treatment B had the same composition, appearance, and route of administration as the Treatment A, but contained no estradiol.
Duration of Treatment
The study involved a screening period of up to 28 days before randomization and a treatment period of 14 days.
Criteria for Evaluation
Efficacy Endpoints:
Other endpoints include:
Results from the assessment of plasma concentrations of estradiol are presented in Table 5.
Maturation Index Results
Vaginal cytology data was collected as vaginal smears from the lateral vaginal walls according to standard procedures to evaluate vaginal cytology at screening and Visit 3—End of treatment (day 15). The change in the Maturation Index was assessed as a change in cell composition measured at Visit 1—Baseline (day 1) compared to the cell composition measured at Visit 3—End of treatment (day 15). The change in percentage of superficial, parabasal, and intermediate cells obtained from the vaginal mucosal epithelium from a vaginal smear was recorded. Results from these assessments are presented in Tables 6, 7, and 8.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 g-Placebo from ANOVA with treatment as a fixed effect.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANOVA with treatment as a fixed effect.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVAwith treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
Change in pH Results
Vaginal pH was measured at Screening and Visit 3—End of treatment (day 15). The pH measurement was obtained by pressing a pH indicator strip against the vaginal wall. The subjects entering the study were required to have a vaginal pH value greater than 5.0 at screening. pH values were recorded on the subject's case report form. The subjects were advised not to have sexual activity and to refrain from using vaginal douching within 24 hours prior to the measurement. Results from these assessments are presented in Table 9.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
Most Bothersome Symptoms Data
Subjects were asked to specify the symptom that she identified as the “most bothersome symptom.” During the screening period all of the subjects were provided with a questionnaire to self-assess the symptoms of VVA: (1) vaginal dryness; (2) vaginal or vulvar irritation, burning, or itching; (3) dysuria; (4) dyspareunia; (5) vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity. Each symptom, with the exception of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity, was measured on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was measured in a binary scale: N=no bleeding; Y=bleeding. The subject's responses were recorded. All randomized subjects were also provided a questionnaire to self-assess the symptoms of VVA at Visit 1—Randomization/Baseline (day 1) and at Visit 3—End of the treatment (day 15). Subjects recorded their self-assessments daily in a diary and answers were collected on days 8 and 15 (end of treatment). Pre-dose evaluation results obtained at Visit 1 were considered as baseline data for the statistical analyses. Data from these assessments are presented in Tables 10 and 11.
1P-value for treatment comparison from ANOVA/ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and Baseline as a covariate when appropriate.
2N = number of subjects sexually active at baseline.
3Percent of subjects with bleeding, evaluated using Fisher's Exact Test.
1ANOVA model contained a fixed effect for treatment. ANCOVA added baseline as a covariate to the model.
2Confidence interval for the difference between estradiol 10 μg and Placebo treatment least-squares means.
Changes to the most bothersome symptom from the baseline was scored according to the evaluation of VVA symptoms generally set forth above. Tables 13 and 14 show a comparison between the pharmaceutical composition 1 and placebo generally for most bothersome symptom and vaginal atrophy symptom. It is noteworthy to point out that these measurement demonstrated a trend of improvement, though not statistically significant, at day 15.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANOVA with treatment as a fixed effect.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANOVA with treatment as a fixed effect.
1ANOVA model contained a fixed effect for treatment. ANCOVA added baseline as a covariate to the model.
2Confidence interval for the difference between TX-12-004-HR and Placebo treatment least-squares means.
With respect to the most bothersome symptoms data presented in Tables 13 and 14, the period over which the data was measured is generally considered insufficient to make meaningful conclusions. However, the trends observed as part of this study suggest that the data will show improvement of the most bothersome symptoms when data for a longer time period is collected.
The absence or presence of any vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was also measured as one of the most bothersome symptoms. The data for vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity is reported in Table 15.
1P-value for treatment comparison from Fisher's Exact Test.
2Percent is based on the number of subjects classified as either a Success or a Failure (N = 2 for estradiol 10 μg; N = 5 for Placebo
Estradiol Level/Pharmacokinetics Data
In this study, the systemic exposure to estradiol following once daily intravaginal administration of estradiol 10 μg for 14 days was investigated. Descriptive statistics of the plasma estradiol concentrations taken at each sampling time and the observed Cmax and Tmax values were recorded in Tables 16 and 17. No statistically significant difference in the systemic concentration of estradiol 10 μg versus the placebo group was observed, which suggests the estradiol is not carried into the blood stream where it will have a systemic effect. Rather, it remains in localized tissues; the effect of estradiol is therefore believed be local to the location of administration (i.e., the vagina). The lower limits of detection of the assays used to measure the pharmacokinetic data may have affected the measured the accuracy of the PK values presented. Additional PK studies were performed with more accurate assays in Examples 8 and 9.
For the purpose of monitoring the estradiol level during the study blood samples were collected at 0.0, 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0 hours relative to dosing on day 1; prior to dosing on day 8; and prior to dosing on day 15. Efforts were made to collect blood samples at their scheduled times. Sample collection and handling procedures for measurement of estradiol blood level was performed according to procedure approved by the sponsor and principal investigator. All baseline and post-treatment plasma estradiol concentrations were determined using a validated bioanalytical (UPLC-MS/MS) methods. These data are shown in Tables 16 and 17.
Assessment of Vaginal Mucosa Data
The investigators rated the vaginal mucosal appearance at day 1 (pre-dose) and day 15. Vaginal color, vaginal epithelial integrity, vaginal epithelial surface thickness, and vaginal secretions were evaluated according to the following degrees of severity: none, mild, moderate, or severe using scales 0 to 3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Results from these investigators rated assessments are presented in Tables 18, 19, 20, and 21.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
1Confidence interval for the estradiol 10 μg-Placebo from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
2P-value for treatment comparison from ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as a covariate.
Delivery Vehicle Disintegration Data
Assessment of capsule disintegration in the vagina (presence or absence) at Day 1 (6 hours after dosing) and Day 15. Results of this assessment is presented in Table 22.
Serum hormone level data was collected to measure the serum concentrations of estradiol. These data were used for screening inclusion and were determined using standard clinical chemistry methods.
Appropriateness of Measurements
The selection of the efficacy measurements used in this study was based on FDA's recommendations for studies of estrogen and estrogen/progestin drug products for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with the menopause and moderate to severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy associated with the menopause (Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry, Estrogen and Estrogen/Progestin Drug Products to Treat Vasomotor Symptoms and Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy Symptoms Recommendations for Clinical Evaluation. January 2003, hereby incorporated by reference).
Standard clinical, laboratory, and statistical procedures were utilized in the trial. All clinical laboratory procedures were generally accepted and met quality standards.
Statistical Methods:
Efficacy:
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the change from baseline differences between the subjects receiving estradiol 10 μg and placebo capsules for all efficacy endpoints, except for vaginal bleeding, to estimate the effect size and variability of the effect. In some cases, for example, for some vaginal atrophy symptoms, the change from baseline (post dose response) was correlated with the baseline value (p<0.05), so baseline was included as a covariate to adjust for this correlation (Analysis of Covariance, ANCOVA). The 90% confidence intervals on the differences between estradiol 10 μg and placebo endpoint means were determined to evaluate the effect size. The change from baseline in vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was evaluated in terms of the proportion of subjects who had treatment success or failure. Any subject reporting bleeding at baseline who did not report bleeding at Day 15 was considered to have been successfully treated. Any subject reporting bleeding at day 15 was considered a treatment failure, regardless of whether they reported baseline bleeding or not. Subjects reporting no bleeding at both baseline and day 15 were classified as no-change and were excluded from the statistical evaluation. The difference in the proportion of subjects with success between the two treatment groups was statistically evaluated using Fisher's Exact Test. Results of this difference in proportion are presented in Table 10.
Measurements of Treatment Compliance
Subjects were required to complete a diary in order to record treatment compliance. Diaries were reviewed for treatment compliance at day 8 and day 15 visits. A total of 45 subjects (21 subjects in the estradiol 10 μg group and 24 subjects in the placebo group) were 100% compliant with the treatment regimen.
Due to the investigative nature of the study, no adjustments were made for multiplicity of endpoints.
Safety:
The frequency and severity of all adverse events were summarized descriptively by treatment group.
Results: All forty eight (48) subjects who completed the study were included in the primary efficacy analyses. The results of efficacy analyses are presented throughout Tables 5, 6, and 7.
Efficacy
The two-week treatment with pharmaceutical composition 10 μg led to a statistically significant greater mean decrease in percent of parabasal cells than did placebo treatment (54% vs. 5%, p<0.0001), as illustrated in Table 6. At the same time, a significantly greater mean increase in the percent of superficial cells was observed with the pharmaceutical composition (35%) than with the placebo capsules (9%), with the difference being highly statistically significant (p=0.0002), as illustrated in Table 7. The difference in pH reduction between the pharmaceutical composition (0.97 units) compared to that for the placebo (0.34 units) was only slightly greater than 0.5 units, but the difference was detected as statistically significant (p=0.0002), as illustrated in Table 9.
While the decrease in severity of the most bothersome symptom was essentially the same (˜1 unit) for both pharmaceutical composition and placebo, the reductions in the severity of the individual symptoms of vaginal dryness, irritation and pain during sexual activity were all marginally better for the active treatment than for the placebo treatment. None of the differences between the two treatments, all of which were ≤0.3 units, were detected as statistically significant. There was no difference between the two treatments in regard to reduction of pain/burning/stinging during urination (˜0.4 unit reduction). The length of the study was not long enough to show a separation between the most bothersome symptoms in the pharmaceutical composition and placebo. However, the trends of most bothersome symptoms suggest that with a suitable period of time, significantly significant differences between the two treatments would be observed.
The two-week treatment with estradiol 10 μg capsules showed no statistically detectable difference in regard to reduction of severity from baseline according to the investigator's assessment of vaginal color or vaginal epithelial surface thickness. Pharmaceutical composition capsules did demonstrate a statistically significant greater reduction than did placebo in severity of atrophic effects on vaginal epithelial integrity (−0.34 vs. 0.18, p=0.0001) and vaginal secretions (−0.64 vs. −0.27, p=0.0401).
Descriptive statistical analyses (mean, median, geometric mean, standard deviation, CV, minimum and maximum, Cmax, and Tmax) were conducted on the estradiol concentrations at each sampling time, the peak concentration on day 1 and the time of peak concentration. Results from this assessment are presented in Tables 16 and 17.
A pharmaceutical composition comprising estradiol 10 μg outperformed placebo treatment in regard to improvement in the Maturation Index, reduction in vaginal pH, reduction in the atrophic effects on epithelial integrity and vaginal secretions. The lack of statistical significance between the two treatments in regard to reduction of severity for the most bothersome symptom, and the individual vaginal atrophy symptoms of dryness, irritation, pain associated with sexual activity, and pain/burning/stinging during urination, is not unexpected given the small number of subjects in the study and the short duration of therapy. Too few subjects in the study had vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity to permit any meaningful evaluation of this vaginal atrophy symptom.
Of the 48 subjects enrolled in the study, 45 subjects were 100% compliant with the treatment regimen. Of the remaining three subjects, one removed herself from the study due to personal reasons and the other two subjects each missed one dose due to an adverse event.
Safety
Although the Day 1 mean plasma estradiol peak concentration for the pharmaceutical composition was somewhat higher than that for the Placebo (ratio of geometric means=1.21:Test Product (estradiol 10 μg) 21%>Placebo), no statistically significant difference was determined. However, the assay methods were questionable, resulting in questionable PK data. Additional PK studies were performed in Examples 8 and 9.
There were no serious adverse events in the study.
Overall, the pharmaceutical composition comprising estradiol 10 μg was well tolerated when administered intravaginally in once daily regimen for 14 days.
A PK study was undertaken to compare the 25 μg formulation disclosed herein (Pharmaceutical Composition 3) to the RLD. The results of the PK study for estradiol are summarized in Table 23. The p values for these data demonstrate statistical significance, as shown in Table 24.
As illustrated in Table 23, baseline adjusted PK data illustrates that the formulations disclosed herein unexpectedly show a 54% decrease in Cmax and a 31% decrease in the AUC relative to the RLD. This result is desirable because the estradiol is intended only for local absorption. These data suggest a decrease in the circulating levels of estradiol relative to the RLD. Moreover, it is noteworthy to point out that the Cmax and AUC levels of estradiol relative to placebo are not statistically differentiable, which suggests that the formulations disclosed herein have a negligible systemic effect. As shown in Table 24, there was no significant difference between the test and reference products due to sequence and period effects. However, there was a significant difference due to treatment effect for both Cmax and AUC.
Pharmacokinetics for circulating total estrone, a metabolite of estradiol, is show in Table 25. These data show that the total circulating estrone for the formulations disclosed herein resulted in a 55% decrease in the Cmax for circulating estrone, and a 70% decrease in the AUC for circulating estrone.
There was a significant difference between test and reference products due to treatment effect whereas there was no significant difference due to sequence and period effects for Cmax. For AUC, there was a significant difference between test and reference products due to treatment, sequence, and period effects.
PK for circulating total estrone sulfate is shown in Table 27. These data show that the total circulating estrone sulfate for the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein resulted in a 33% decrease in the Cmax and a 42% decrease in the AUC for circulating estrone sulfate.
There was a significant difference between test and reference products due to treatment effect whereas there was no significant difference due sequence and period effects for both Cmax and AUC.
A PK study was undertaken to compare the 10 μg formulation disclosed herein (Pharmaceutical Composition 2) to the RLD. The results of the PK study for estradiol are summarized in Table 29-40, and
A PK study was undertaken to compare pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein having 10 μg of estradiol to the RLD. The results of the PK study for estradiol are summarized in Tables 29-34, which demonstrate that the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein more effectively prevented systemic absorption of the estradiol. Table 35 shows that the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein had a 28% improvement over the RLD for systemic blood concentration Cmax and 72% AUC improvement over the RLD.
The PK data for total estrone likewise demonstrated reduced systemic exposure when compared to the RLD. Table 33 shows the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein reduced systemic exposure by 25% for Cmax and 49% for AUC.
The PK data for estrone sulfate likewise demonstrated reduced systemic exposure when compared to the RLD. Table 37 shows the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein reduced systemic exposure by 25% for Cmax and 42% for AUC.
Investigational Plan
The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study design. Postmenopausal subjects who meet the study entry criteria will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 4 μg, Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 10 μg, Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 25 μg, or matching placebo. Subjects will be asked to self-assess the symptoms of vulvar or vaginal atrophy including vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, vaginal dryness, vulvar or vaginal itching or irritation by completing the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire and identification of her MBS at screening visit 1A to determine eligibility for the study. The VVA symptom Self-Assessment Questionnaire, vaginal cytology, vaginal pH, and vaginal mucosa will be assessed at screening visit 1B. These assessments will determine continued eligibility and will be used as the baseline assessments for the study. Randomized subjects will then complete the Questionnaire during visits 3, 4, 5, and 6.
The primary efficacy endpoints for the study included: (A) change from baseline to week 12 in the percentage of vaginal superficial cells (by vaginal cytologic smear) compared to placebo; (B) change from baseline to week 12 in the percentage of vaginal parabasal cells (by vaginal cytologic smear) compared to placebo; (C) change from baseline at week 12 in vaginal pH as compared to placebo; and (D) change from baseline to week 12 on the severity of the MBS of dyspareunia (vaginal pain associated with sexual activity) associated with VVA as compared to placebo.
The secondary efficacy endpoints for the study included: (E) change from baseline to weeks 2, 6, and 8 in the percentage of vaginal superficial cells (by vaginal cytologic smear) compared to placebo; (F) change from baseline to weeks 2, 6, and 8 in the percentage of vaginal parabasal cells (by vaginal cytologic smear) compared to placebo; (G) change from baseline to weeks 2, 6, and 8 in vaginal pH as compared to placebo; (H) change from baseline to weeks 2, 6, and 8 on the severity of the MBS of dyspareunia (vaginal pain associated with sexual activity) associated with VVA as compared to placebo; (I) change from baseline to weeks 2, 6, 8, and 12 on the severity of vaginal dryness and vulvar or vaginal itching or irritation associated with VVA as compared to placebo; (J) change in visual evaluation of the vaginal mucosa from baseline to weeks 2, 6, 8, and 12 compared to placebo; (K) assessment of standard PK parameters as defined in the SAP for serum estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates at Screening Visit 1A, days 1, 14, and 84 of treatment in a subset of subjects (PK substudy) utilizing baseline corrected and uncorrected values [as outlined in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)]; and (L) change from baseline in the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) at week 12 compared to placebo.
The safety endpoints for the study included: (1) Adverse events; (2) Vital signs; (3) Physical examination findings; (4) Gynecological examination findings; (5) Clinical laboratory tests; (6) Pap smears; and (7) Endometrial biopsy.
Approximately 100 sites in the United States and Canada screened approximately 1500 subjects to randomize 747 subjects in this study (modified intent to treatment population, or all subjects who have taken at least one dose of the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein), with a target of 175 subjects randomized to each treatment group (175 in each active treatment group and 175 in the placebo group to complete 560 subjects). Actual subjects enrolled are 186 subjects in the 4 μg formulation group, 188 subjects in the 10 μg formulation group, 186 subjects in the 25 μg formulation group, and 187 subjects in the placebo group, for a total of 747 subjects in the study. Within each treatment group, 15 subjects also participated in a PK substudy. Subjects were assigned to one of four treatment groups: (1) 4 μg formulation; (2) 10 μg formulation; (3) 25 μg formulation; and (4) placebo.
Most subjects participated in the study for 20-22 weeks. This included a 6 to 8 week screening period (6 weeks for subjects without an intact uterus and 8 weeks for subjects with an intact uterus), 12 weeks on the investigational product, and a follow-up period of approximately 15 days after the last dose of investigational product. Some subjects' involvement lasted up to 30 weeks when an 8-week wash-out period was necessary. Subjects who withdrew from the study were not replaced regardless of the reason for withdrawal.
The study schematic diagram shown in
The subject inclusion criteria included: (1) postmenopausal female subjects between the ages of 40 and 75 years (at the time of randomization) with at least: 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea (women <55 years of age with history of hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy prior to natural menopause must have follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels >40 mIU/mL); or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels >40 mIU/mL; or At least 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy.
The subject inclusion criteria also included: (2)≤5% superficial cells on vaginal cytological smear; (3) Vaginal pH>5.0; (4) Moderate to severe symptom of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity considered the most bothersome vaginal symptom by the subject at screening visit 1A; (5) Moderate to severe symptom of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity at screening visit 1B; (6) Onset of moderate to severe dyspareunia in the postmenopausal years; (7) Subjects were sexually active (i.e., had sexual activity with vaginal penetration within approximately 1 month of screening visit 1A); and (8) Subjects anticipated having sexual activity (with vaginal penetration) during the conduct of the trial
For subjects with an intact uterus, the subject inclusion criteria also included: (9) subjects had an acceptable result from an evaluable screening endometrial biopsy. The endometrial biopsy reports by the two central pathologists at screening specified one of the following: proliferative endometrium; weakly proliferative endometrium; disordered proliferative pattern; secretory endometrium; endometrial tissue other (i.e., benign, inactive, or atrophic fragments of endometrial epithelium, glands, stroma, etc.); endometrial tissue insufficient for diagnosis; no endometrium identified; no tissue identified; endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial malignancy; or other findings (endometrial polyp not present, benign endometrial polyp, or other endometrial polyp). Identification of sufficient tissue to evaluate the biopsy by at least one pathologist was required.
For subjects with a Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to 38 kg/m2, the subject inclusion criteria also included: (10) BMI values were rounded to the nearest integer (ex. 32.4 rounds down to 32, while 26.5 rounds up to 27).
In general, the inclusion criteria also included: (11) in the opinion of the investigator, the subject was believed likely to comply with the protocol and complete the study.
The exclusion criteria included: (1) use of oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or SERM-containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening visit 1A (entry of washout was permitted); use of transdermal hormone products within 4 weeks before screening visit 1A (entry of washout was permitted); use of vaginal hormone products (rings, creams, gels) within 4 weeks before screening visit 1A (entry of washout was permitted); use of intrauterine progestins within 8 weeks before screening visit 1A (entry of washout was permitted); use of progestin implants/injectables or estrogen pellets/injectables within 6 months before screening visit 1A (entry of washout was not permitted); or use of vaginal lubricants or moisturizers within 7 days before the screening visit 1B vaginal pH assessment.
The exclusion criteria also included: (2) a history or active presence of clinically important medical disease that might confound the study or be detrimental to the subject, including, for example: hypersensitivity to estrogens; endometrial hyperplasia; undiagnosed vaginal bleeding; a history of a chronic liver or kidney dysfunction/disorder (e.g., Hepatitis C or chronic renal failure); thrombophlebitis, thrombosis, or thromboembolic disorders; cerebrovascular accident, stroke, or transient ischemic attack; myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease; malignancy or treatment for malignancy, within the previous 5 years, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (a history of estrogen dependent neoplasia, breast cancer, melanoma, or any gynecologic cancer, at any time, excluded the subject); and endocrine disease (except for controlled hypothyroidism or controlled non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus).
The exclusion criteria also included: (3) recent history of known alcohol or drug abuse; (4) history of sexual abuse or spousal abuse that was likely to interfere with the subject's assessment of vaginal pain with sexual activity; (5) current history of heavy smoking (more than 15 cigarettes per day) or use of e-cigarettes; (6) use of an intrauterine device within 12 weeks before screening visit 1A; (7) use of an investigational drug within 60 days before screening visit 1A; (8) any clinically important abnormalities on screening physical exam, assessments, electrocardiogram (ECG), or laboratory tests; (9) known pregnancy or a positive urine pregnancy test; and (10) current use of marijuana.
In this study, if a subject discontinued or was withdrawn, the subject was not replaced. At the time of consent, each subject was given a unique subject number that identified their clinical site and sequential number. In addition to the assigned subject number, subject initials were used for identification. The clinical trial was performed in compliance with standard operating procedures as well as regulations set forth by FDA, ICH E6 (R1) guidelines, and other relevant regulatory authorities. Compliance was achieved through clinical trial-specific audits of clinical sites and database review.
Statistical Methods
Efficacy.
The primary objective of the trial was to assess the efficacy of estradiol vaginal softgel capsules (4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg) when compared to placebo on vaginal superficial cells, vaginal parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and on the symptom of moderate to severe dyspareunia (vaginal pain associated with sexual activity) as the MBS at week 12. To account for the multiple comparisons of testing placebo to each of the three doses of estradiol (4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg) and the multiple testing of the four co-primary endpoints, a closed procedure was performed (see, Edwards D, Madsen J. “Constructing multiple procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets.” Stat Med 2007:26-5116-24, incorporated by reference herein).
Determination of Sample Size.
The sample size needed per dose vs. placebo for each test of hypothesis in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population to achieve a given power was calculated using reference data from other studies (see, Bachman, G., et al. “Efficacy and safety of low-dose regimens of conjugated estrogens cream administered vaginally.” Menopause, 2009. 16(4): p. 719-2′7; Simon, J., et al. “Effective Treatment of Vaginal Atrophy With an Ultra-Low-Dose Estradiol Vaginal Tablet.” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008. 112(5):p. 1053-60; FDA Medical Officer's Review of Vagifem [NDA 20-908, Mar. 25, 1999, Table 6, p 12.], each incorporated by reference herein). Table 41 below provides the effect sizes, power, and sample size determinations for each of the primary endpoints. In general, subjects in the study met all inclusion/exclusion criteria and had moderate to severe dyspareunia as their most bothersome symptom of VVA. Based on the power analysis and the design considerations, approximately 175 subjects per treatment arm were enrolled.
All subjects who were randomly assigned and had at least 1 dose of investigational product formed the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The Modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population was defined as all ITT subjects with a baseline and at least one follow-up value for each of the primary endpoints, each subject having taken at least one dose of investigational product, and was the primary efficacy population. The efficacy-evaluable (EE) population was defined as all MITT subjects who completed the clinical trial, were at least 80% compliant with investigational product, had measurements for all primary efficacy endpoints, and were deemed to be protocol compliant, with no significant protocol violations. The safety population included all ITT subjects.
The primary efficacy analyses were conducted on the MITT subjects with supportive efficacy analyses conducted on the EE population. For analysis purposes, subjects were required to complete all visits, up to and including Visit 6 (week 12), to be considered as having completed the study.
Analysis of Efficacy Endpoints.
For all numerically continuous efficacy endpoints, which included the four primary endpoints (mean change from baseline to week 12), active treatment group means were compared to placebo using an ANCOVA adjusting for the baseline level.
Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were measured at baseline and at 2, 6, 8, and 12 weeks. The analysis examined change from baseline. Therefore, ANCOVAs were based on a repeated measures mixed effects model (MMRM) where the random effect was subject and the two fixed effects were treatment group and visit (2, 6, 8, and 12 weeks). Baseline measures and age were used as covariates. ANCOVAs were therefore not calculated independently for each study collection period. The analyses started with the full model but, interaction terms for visit (week 2, 6, 8, and 12) with treatment only remained where statistically significant (p<0.05).
The following three pair-wise comparisons were performed using the appropriate ANCOVA contrast for week 12 (primary) and weeks 2, 6, and 8 (secondary) changes from baseline: (1) active treatment, high dose group vs placebo; (2) active treatment, middle dose group vs placebo; and (3) active treatment, low dose group vs placebo.
Safety Outcome Measures.
Adverse events, vital signs, physical examination findings, gynecological examination findings, clinical laboratory tests, pap smears, and endometrial biopsy were the safety parameters. Adverse events and SAEs were summarized for each treatment group and overall for all active treatment groups with the proportion of subjects reporting each event. Actual values and change from baseline in vital signs, and all laboratory test parameters were summarized for each treatment group and overall for all active treatment groups with descriptive statistics at each assessment obtained.
Endometrial Biopsy Assessment.
Three independent pathologists with expertise in gynecologic pathology, blinded to treatment and to each other's readings, determined the diagnosis for endometrial biopsy slides during the conduct of the study. All visit 6, early termination, and on-treatment unscheduled endometrial biopsies were centrally read by three of the pathologists. Each pathologist's report was classified into one of the following three categories: category 1: not hyperplasia/not malignancy—includes proliferative endometrium, weakly proliferative endometrium, disordered proliferative pattern, secretory endometrium, endometrial tissue other (i.e., benign, inactive or atrophic fragments of endometrial epithelium, glands, stroma, etc.), endometrial tissue insufficient for diagnosis, no endometrium identified, no tissue identified, other; category 2: hyperplasia—includes simple hyperplasia with or without atypia and complex hyperplasia with or without atypia; category 3: malignancy—endometrial malignancy.
The final diagnosis was based on agreement of two of the three reads. Consensus was reached when two of the three pathologist readers agreed on any of the above categories. For example, any 2 subcategories of “not hyperplasia/not malignancy” were classified as “Category 1: not hyperplasia/not malignancy.” If all three readings were disparate (i.e., each fell into a different category—category 1, 2, or 3), the final diagnosis was based on the most severe of the three readings.
The analysis population for endometrium hyperplasia was the endometrial hyperplasia (EH) population. An EH subject at week 12 was one who was randomly assigned and took at least 1 dose of investigational product, with no exclusionary protocol violation (as detailed at the Statistical Analysis Plan), and had a pretreatment endometrial biopsy and a biopsy on therapy.
Treatment of Subjects
The study used a double-blind design. Investigational product was supplied as 3 doses of Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsules (4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg) and matching placebo capsules. All subjects manually inserted one capsule into the vaginal cavity daily for 14 days (2 weeks) followed by twice weekly for 10 weeks according to one of the following treatment arms:
Investigational product was dispensed to all eligible subjects at visit 2. Each subject was provided a total of 30 soft gel capsules of investigational product in a labeled bottle, allowing for extra capsules for accidental loss or damage. A second bottle was dispensed at Visit 5. Each subject was trained by the clinical site to self-administer intravaginally one capsule daily at approximately the same hour for 2 weeks (14 days). The drug administration instructions included: “Remove vaginal capsule from the bottle; find a position most comfortable for you; insert the capsule with the smaller end up into vaginal canal for about 2 inches.” Starting on Day 15, each subject administered 1 capsule twice weekly for the remaining 10 weeks. Twice weekly dosing was approximately 3-4 days apart, and generally did not exceed more than twice in a seven day period. For example, if the Day 15 dose was inserted on Sunday, the next dose was inserted on Wednesday or Thursday. At randomization visit 2 (day 1), subjects received their first dose of investigational product at the clinical facility under the supervision of the study personnel.
The investigational estradiol vaginal softgel drug products used in the study are pear-shaped, opaque, light pink softgel capsules. The capsules contain the solubilized estradiol pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein as Pharmaceutical Compositions 4-7. When the softgel capsules come in contact with the vaginal mucosa, the soft gelatin capsule releases the pharmaceutical composition, into the vagina. In embodiments, the soft gelatin capsule completely dissolves.
The placebo used in the study contained the excipients in the investigational estradiol vaginal softgel capsule without the estradiol (see, e.g., Pharmaceutical Composition 7). The packaging of the investigational products and placebo were identical to maintain adequate blinding of investigators. Neither the subject nor the investigator was able to identify the treatment from the packaging or label of the investigational products.
A subject was required to use at least 80% of the investigational product to be considered compliant with investigational medication administration. Capsule count and diary cards were be used to determine subject compliance at each study visit. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 4 μg (Pharmaceutical Composition 4), Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 10 μg (Pharmaceutical Composition 5), Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule 25 μg (Pharmaceutical Composition 6), or placebo (Pharmaceutical Composition 7).
Concomitant medications/treatments were used to treat chronic or intercurrent medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator. The following medications were prohibited for the duration of the study: investigational drugs other than the investigational Estradiol Vaginal Softgel Capsule; estrogen-, progestin-, androgen (i.e., DHEA) or SERM-containing medications other than the investigational product; medications, remedies, and supplements known to treat vulvar/vaginal atrophy; vaginal lubricants and moisturizers (e.g., Replens) be discontinued 7 days prior to Visit 1B vaginal pH assessment; and all medications excluded before the study.
Efficacy Assessments
Vaginal cytological smears were collected from the lateral vaginal walls according to standard procedures and sent to a central laboratory to evaluate vaginal cytology. The percentage of superficial, parabasal, and intermediate cells was determined. All on-therapy/early termination vaginal cytology results were blinded to the Sponsor, Investigators, and subjects.
Vaginal pH was determined at screening Visit 1B and visits 3, 4, 5, and 6/end of treatment. Subjects were not allowed to use vaginal lubricants or moisturizers within 7 days of the screening vaginal pH assessment or at any time afterwards during the study. The subjects were advised not to have sexual intercourse and to refrain from using vaginal douching within 24 hours prior to the measurement for all scheduled vaginal pH assessments. After insertion of an unlubricated speculum, a pH indicator strip was applied to the lateral vaginal wall until it became wet, taking care to avoid cervical mucus, blood or semen that are known to affect vaginal pH. The color of the strip was compared immediately with a colorimetric scale and the measurement was recorded.
During the gynecological examinations, the investigator performed a visual evaluation of vaginal mucosa using a four-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe) to assess parameters of vaginal secretions, vaginal epithelial integrity, vaginal epithelial surface thickness, and vaginal color according to the table below.
The VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire, shown below, is an instrument for subjects to self-assess their symptoms of vulvar or vaginal atrophy, including vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, vaginal dryness, vulvar or vaginal itching, or irritation. At screening visit 1A subjects were asked to complete the questionnaire and identify their most bothersome symptoms, and the results of the survey were used to determine initial eligibility for the study. At visit 1A, subjects were also asked to indicate which moderate or severe symptoms bothered them most. The questionnaire was administered again at screening visit 1B and used to determine continued eligibility for the study.
Randomized subjects were asked to complete the VVA Symptom Self-Assessment Questionnaire at visits 3, 4, 5, and 6. Subjects were asked to indicate if no sexual activity with vaginal penetration was experience since the previous visit. Screening visit 1B evaluation results were considered as Baseline data for the statistical analyses.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a brief, multidimensional scale for assessing sexual function in women (see, Rosen, 2000, supra 26: p. 191-208, incorporated by reference herein). The scale consists of 19 items that assess sexual function over the past 4 weeks and yield domain scores in six areas: sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Further validation of the instrument was conducted to extend the validation to include dyspareunia/vaginismus (pain), and multiple sexual dysfunctions (see, Weigel, M., et al. “The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-Validation and Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 2005. 31: p. 1-20, incorporated by reference herein). The FSFI was conducted at Visits 2 and 6. Subjects participating in the PK substudy were not assessed using FSFI.
Safety Assessments
A complete medical history, including demographic data (age and race/ethnicity) gynecological, surgical, and psychiatric history and use of tobacco and alcohol was recorded at the washout/screening visit 1A prior to any washout period; this history included a review of all past and current diseases and their respective durations as well as any history of amenorrhea.
A complete physical examination was conducted at screening visit 1A and visit 6/end of treatment. The physical examination included, at a minimum, examination of the subject's general appearance, HEENT (head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat), heart, lungs, musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal (GI) system, neurological system, lymph nodes, abdomen, and extremities. The subject's height was measured at washout/screening visit 1A only and body weight (while the subject is lightly clothed) was be measured at washout/screening visit 1A and end of treatment. BMI was calculated at washout/screening visit 1A. Vital signs (body temperature, heart rate [HR], respiration rate [RR], and sitting blood pressure [BP]) were measured at all visits after the subject had been sitting for ≥10 minutes. If the initial BP reading was above 140 mmHg systolic or 90 mmHg diastolic, the option for a single repeat assessment performed 15 minutes later was provided. A standard 12-lead ECG was obtained at screening visit 1A and visit 6 or early termination.
Subjects were required to have a pelvic examination and Pap smear performed during the screening visit 1B and visit 6 or early termination. The Pap smear was required for all subjects with or without an intact uterus and cervix. For subjects without an intact cervix the Pap smear was obtained by sampling the apex of the vaginal cuff. All subjects were required to have a Pap smear done during screening, regardless of any recent prior assessment. Subjects who discontinued the study after 2 weeks of investigational product were required to have an end of treatment Pap smear. Subjects had a breast examination performed during screening visit 1A and at visit 6 or early termination.
Endometrial biopsies were performed by a board-certified gynecologist at screening and at visit 6/end of treatment. Unscheduled endometrial biopsies were performed during the study, when indicated for medical reasons. The screening biopsy was performed at screening visit 1B, after the subject's initial screening visit assessments indicated that the subject was otherwise an eligible candidate for the study.
At screening, endometrial biopsies were read centrally by two pathologists. A candidate subject was excluded from the study if at least one pathologist assessed the endometrial biopsy as endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, proliferative endometrium, weakly proliferative endometrium, or disordered proliferative pattern, or if at least one pathologist identified an endometrial polyp with hyperplasia, glandular atypia of any degree (e.g., atypical nuclei), or cancer. Additionally, identification of sufficient tissue to evaluate the biopsy by at least one pathologist was required for study eligibility. The option for one repetition of the screening endometrial biopsy was made available when an initial endometrial biopsy was performed and both of the primary pathologists reported endometrial tissue insufficient for diagnosis, no endometrium was identified, or no tissue was identified, and if the subject had met all other protocol-specified eligibility criteria to date. The visit 6 (or early termination) endometrial biopsies and on treatment unscheduled biopsies were assessed by three pathologists.
During the study, at early termination, and at the end of the study, any subject with a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia was withdrawn and treated with 10 mg of Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for 6 months unless deemed otherwise by the PI. For unscheduled biopsies, the histological diagnosis of endometrial polyp did not force withdrawal unless atypical nuclei were present.
A urine pregnancy test was conducted at screening visit 1A unless the subject had a history of tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or was ≥55 years of age and had experienced cessation of menses for at least 1 year.
Blood samples for blood chemistry, hematology, coagulation tests, and hormone levels and urine samples for urine analysis were collected and sent to a central laboratory. Blood Chemistry (sodium, potassium, chloride, total cholesterol, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), iron, albumin, total protein, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, calcium, phosphorous, uric acid, total bilirubin, glucose and triglycerides (must be fasting minimum of 8 hours). A fasting glucose of >125 mg/dL will require a HgA1C) was monitored. Hematology (complete blood count (CBC) including white blood cell count and differential, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count) was monitored. Hormone Levels (follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (not required for subjects with ≥12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea or bilateral oophorectomy), estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates and SHBG for subjects in the PK substudy) were monitored. Urine Analysis (appearance, specific gravity, protein, and pH) was conducted.
Pharmacokinetic Assessment
Seventy-two subjects were also enrolled in a pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy. In those subjects participating in the PK substudy, time 0 h serum blood samples were obtained at screening visit 1A, day 1, and day 14 prior to dosing for baseline. The baseline was characterized by the average of the two pre-treatment samples. Serum blood samples were then obtained on day 1 and day 14 at five post dose time points (2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 10 h, and 24 h). On study days 1 (visit 2) and 14 (visit 3) a baseline pretreatment blood sample (Time 0 h) was collected from each subject prior to insertion of the investigational product. After insertion of the product, blood samples were drawn at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours following insertion. The last PK sample (approximately day 84) was obtained 4 days following the last insertion of investigational product.
Blood samples were analyzed to characterize area under the curve (AUC), time of maximum concentration (tmax), minimum concentration (Cmax), and maximum concentration (Cmax). Blood samples were also analyzed to measure the levels of estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates. No fasting requirements were applied. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels were obtained at pre-treatment baseline (day 1, visit 2), and day 14 at the 0 h and on the day 84 final hormone blood draw.
A symptoms/complaints and medications diary was dispensed at all visits and subjects were instructed on completion. The subjects used the diary to record symptoms/complaints (including stop and start dates and treatment received) and prior medications/treatments (including indication, stop, and start dates). A copy of the diary was made at each visit and re-dispensed to the subject. A dosing diary was dispensed at visit 2 and at visit 3 and subjects were be instructed on completion. Subjects recorded investigational product usage and sexual activity. The dosing diary dispensed at visit 3 was re-dispensed at visits 4 and 5. A copy of the diary was made at each visit prior to re-dispensing to the subject.
Study Visits
Study visits were typically conducted so as to include the activities outlined in Table 43.
Washout Period Visit (if Applicable; Weeks −14 to −6).
The purpose of this visit was to discuss the study with a potential subject and obtain informed consent that is signed and dated before any procedures, including washout are performed. Subjects who agreed to discontinue current treatment began washout after the consent form was signed. A symptoms/complaints and medication diary was dispensed at this visit and the subject was instructed in how to complete the diary. Once the washout period was completed, the subject will return to the site for visit 1A.
The activities and assessments conducted during the visit included: informed consent; demographics; medical/gynecological history; collection of prior and concomitant medication information; height, body weight measurement and BMI calculation; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); dispensation of symptoms/complaints diary and instruction in how to complete the diary
Screening Period Visits (Visits 1A and 1B).
Subjects not requiring washout begin screening procedures at visit 1A as described above for the washout period. With the exception of vital signs, procedures performed at washout will not be repeated at screening visit 1A. In general, screening visits 1A and 1B were completed within 6 weeks (42 days) for subjects without a uterus or within 8 weeks (56 days) for subjects with a uterus. All screening assessments were completed prior to randomization. The investigators reviewed the results from all screening procedures and determined if the subjects were eligible for enrollment into the study.
Visit 1A (Approximately Week −6 to 0).
Visit 1A was conducted after the wash-out period (if applicable) or after the subject provided informed consent. The subject was advised to fast for 8 hours prior to the visit for blood draws.
Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: informed consent; demographics; medical/gynecological history; collection of the symptoms/complaints and medications diary from washout (if applicable) and review with the subject; recording of prior medication information; recording and assessment of adverse events (AEs) starting from the signing of informed consent; height, body weight measurement and BMI calculation; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); physical examination; breast examination (including a mammogram conducted up to nine months prior to Visit 2); urine pregnancy test as required; blood and urine sample collection for blood chemistry (minimum fast of 8 hrs), hematology, and urinalysis; serum FSH as required; 12-Lead ECG.
At visit 1A, the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire was conducted and most bothersome symptoms were identified, with the subject self-identifying moderate or severe pain with sexual activity as her MBS to continue screening. The symptoms/complaints and medications diary was dispensed, and subjects were instructed in how to complete the diary. Subjects were instructed to refrain from use of vaginal lubricants for 7 days and sexual intercourse/vaginal douching for 24 hours prior to the vaginal pH assessment to be done at visit 1B.
Visit 1B (Approximately Week −4 to Week 0).
Visit 1B was conducted after the subject's initial screening visit and after the other screening results indicated that the subject was otherwise an eligible candidate for the study (preferably around the middle of the screening period).
Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire, the subject having indicated moderate to severe pain with sexual activity with vaginal penetration in order to continue screening; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); pelvic examination; investigator assessment of vaginal mucosa as described above; assessment of vaginal pH (sexual intercourse or vaginal douching within 24 hrs prior to the assessment being prohibited, and a subject's vaginal pH being >5.0 to continue screening); Pap smear; vaginal cytological smear (one repetition being permitted during screening if no results were obtained from the first smear); endometrial biopsy performed as described above; review of the symptoms/complaints and medications diary with the subject.
Visit 2 (Week 0; Randomization/Baseline).
Subjects who met entry criteria were randomized to investigational product at this visit. Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: self-administration of FSFI by subjects not participating in the PK substudy; review of the symptoms/complaints and medications diary with the subject; review of evaluations performed at screening visits and verification of present of all inclusion criteria and the absence of all exclusion criteria; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); randomization, with subjects meeting all entry criteria being randomized and allocated a bottle number; dispensation of investigational product and instruction in how to insert the capsule vaginally, with subjects receiving their first dose of investigational product under supervision; dispensation of dosing diary and instruction on completion of the treatment diary, including recording investigational product usage and sexual activity.
Visit 3 (Week 2, Day 14±3 days).
Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: completion of the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire; review of the symptoms/complaints and medications diaries with the subject; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); Assessment of vaginal mucosa; assessment of vaginal pH (with sexual intercourse or vaginal douching within 24 hrs prior to the assessment being prohibited); vaginal cytological smear; collection of unused investigational product and bottle for assessment of compliance/accountability; re-dispensation of investigational product and re-instruction in how to insert the capsule vaginally if necessary; review of the completed dosing diary with the subject.
Visit 4 (Week 6, Day 42±3 days). Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: completion of the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire; review of the symptoms/complaints and medications diary with the subject; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); assessment of vaginal mucosa as described above; vaginal cytological smear; assessment of vaginal pH (with sexual intercourse or vaginal douching within 24 hrs prior to the assessment being prohibited); collection of unused investigational product for assessment of compliance/accountability; re-dispensation of investigational product and re-instruction in how to insert the capsule vaginally if necessary; review of the completed dosing diary with the subject.
Visit 5 (Week 8, Day 56±3 days).
Procedures and evaluations conducted at the visit included: completion of the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire; review of the symptoms/complaints and medications diary with the subject; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP); assessment of vaginal mucosa as described above; vaginal cytological smear; assessment of vaginal pH (with sexual intercourse or vaginal douching within 24 hrs prior to the assessment being prohibited); collection of unused investigational product for assessment of compliance/accountability; re-dispensation of investigational product and re-instruction in how to insert the capsule vaginally if necessary; review of the completed dosing diary with the subject.
Visit 6 (Week 12, Day 84±3 Days or Early Termination).
This visit was performed if a subject withdraws from the study before visit 6. Procedures performed at this visit included: completion of the VVA symptom self-assessment questionnaire; review of the subject the dosing diary, symptoms/complaints, and medications diaries with the subject; collection of blood and urine sample collection for blood chemistry (minimum fast of 8 hrs), hematology, and urinalysis; collection of vital signs (body temperature, HR, RR, and BP) and weight; performance of 12-lead-ECG; collection of unused investigational product and container for assessment of compliance/accountability; physical examination; breast exam; assessment of vaginal mucosa as described above; assessment of vaginal pH (with sexual intercourse or vaginal douching within 24 hrs prior to the assessment being prohibited); vaginal cytological smear; Pap smear; endometrial biopsy; self-administration of FSFI by subjects not participating in the PK substudy; self-administration of survey titled “Acceptability of product administration Survey” by subjects.
Follow-Up Interview (Approximately 15 Days after the Last Dose of Investigational Product).
Each subject who received investigational product received a follow-up phone call, regardless of the duration of therapy, approximately 15 days following the last dose of investigational product. The follow-up generally took place after receipt of all safety assessments (e.g., endometrial biopsy and mammography results). The follow-up included: review of ongoing adverse events and any new adverse events that occurred during the 15 days following the last dose of investigational product; review of ongoing concomitant medications and any new concomitant medications that occurred during the 15 days following the last dose of investigational product; and discussion of all end of study safety assessments and determination if further follow up or clinic visit is required.
PK Substudy Visit Procedures and Schedule
Screening Visit 1A.
In addition to the procedures listed described above, activities in the PK substudy also included: provision of informed consent by subject and agreement to participate in the PK substudy; collection of a serum blood sample during the visit for baseline assessment of estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates.
Visit 2 (Week 0, Day 1).
In addition to the procedures listed described above, activities in the PK substudy also included collection of serum blood sample obtained prior to the administration of investigational product (timepoint 0 h) for baseline assessment of estradiol, estrone, estrone conjugates, and SHBG. The investigational product was self-administered by the subject after the pre-treatment blood sample has been taken. After investigational product administration, serum blood samples were obtained at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 10 h, and 24 h timepoints for estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates (serum samples were generally taken within +/−5 minutes at 2 h and 4 h, within +/−15 minutes at 6 h, and within +/−1 h at 10 h and 24 h). The subject was released from the site after the 10 hour sample and instructed to return to the site the next morning for the 24 hour blood draw. The subject was instructed not to self-administer the day 2 dose until instructed by the site personnel to dose at the clinical site. The subject was released from the clinical site following the 24 hour blood sample and administration of the day 2 dose.
Visit 3 (Week 2, Day 14).
The visit must occurred on day 14 with no visit window allowed. In addition to the procedures listed above, the PK substudy included collection of a serum blood sample prior to the administration of day 14 dose (timepoint 0 h) for SHBG and PK assessments. The subject self-administered the day 14 dose at the clinical site, and serum blood samples were obtained at 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 10 h, and 24 h timepoints for estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates. The subject was released from the site after the 10 hour sample and instructed to return to the site the next morning for the 24 hour blood draw. The subject was instructed not to self-administer the day 15 dose until instructed by the site personnel to dose at the clinical site. The subject was released from the clinical site following the 24 hour blood sample and administration of the day 15 dose. The subject was be instructed to administer the next dose of study drug on day 18 or day 19 and continue dosing on a bi-weekly basis at the same time of day for each dose.
Visit 6 (Week 12, Day 84±3 Days, or at Early Termination).
The visit took place 4 days after last IP dose or early termination. A serum sample for estradiol, estrone, and estrone conjugates and SHBG was drawn in addition to the procedures described above.
PK sub-study visits were typically conducted so as to include the activities outlined in Table 44.
An Adverse Event (AE) in the study was defined as the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered casually related to the product. An AE could occur from overdose of investigational product. In this study, an AE can include an undesirable medical condition occurring at any time, including baseline or washout periods, even if no study treatment has been administered. Relationship to Investigational Product
The investigators determined the relationship to the investigational product for each AE (Not Related, Possibly Related, or Probably Related). The degree of “relatedness” of the adverse event to the investigational product was described as follows: not related—no temporal association and other etiologies are likely the cause; possible—temporal association, but other etiologies are likely the cause. However, involvement of the investigational product cannot be excluded; probable—temporal association, other etiologies are possible but unlikely. The event may respond if the investigational product is discontinued.
Each of the three doses showed statistical significance compared with placebo for the primary endpoints. Each of the three doses showed statistical significance compared with placebo for the secondary endpoints. Table 45 shows the statistical significance of the experimental data for each of the four co-primary endpoints. Each of the dosages met each of the four co-primary endpoints at a statistically significant level. The 25 mcg dose of TX-004HR demonstrated highly statistically significant results at the p≤0.0001 level compared to placebo across all four co-primary endpoints. The 10 mcg dose of TX-004HR demonstrated highly statistically significant results at the p≤0.0001 level compared to placebo across all four co-primary endpoints. The 4 mcg dose of TX-004HR also demonstrated highly statistically significant results at the p≤0.0001 level compared to placebo for the endpoints of superficial vaginal cells, parabasal vaginal cells, and vaginal pH; the change from baseline compared to placebo in the severity of dyspareunia was at the p=0.0255 level.
Statistical improvement over placebo was also observed for all three doses at the first assessment at week two and sustained through week 12. The pharmacokinetic data for all three doses demonstrated low systemic absorption, supporting the previous Phase 1 trial data. TX-004HR was well tolerated, and there were no clinically significant differences compared to placebo-treated women with respect to adverse events. There were no drug-related serious adverse events reported.
As shown in the data below, in the MITT population (n=747) at week 12, all TX-004HR doses compared with placebo significantly decreased the percentage of parabasal cells and vaginal pH, significantly increased the percentage of superficial cells, and significantly reduced the severity of dyspareunia (all p≤0.00001 except dyspareunia at 4 μg p=0.0149).
At weeks 2, 6, and 8, the percentage of parabasal cells and vaginal pH significantly decreased p<0.00001); the percentage of superficial cells significantly increased (p<0.00001); and the severity of dyspareunia significantly improved from baseline with all TX-004HR doses vs placebo (4 μg p<0.03; 10 μg and 25 μg p<0.02).
Moderate-to-severe vaginal dryness was reported by 93% at baseline and significantly improved (p<0.02) for all doses at weeks 2, 6, 8, and 12 (except 4 μg at week 2). Vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation significantly improved (p<0.05) for 10 μg at weeks 8 and 12, and for 25 μg at week 12.
TX-004HR was well tolerated, had high acceptability, and no treatment-related serious AEs were reported in the safety population (n=764). There were no clinically significant differences in any AEs or treatment-related SAEs between TX-004HR and placebo. Very low to negligible systemic levels of estradiol were observed.
All TX-004HR doses were safe and effective and resulted in very low to negligible systemic absorption of E2 in women with VVA and moderate-to-severe dyspareunia. Onset of effect was seen as early as 2 weeks and was maintained throughout the study and acceptability was very high. This novel product provides a promising new treatment option for women experiencing menopausal VVA.
Cytology
Vaginal cytology data was collected as vaginal smears from the lateral vaginal walls according to procedures presented above to evaluate vaginal cytology at screening and Visit 6—End of treatment (day 84). The change in the Maturation Index was assessed as a change in cell composition measured at Visit 1—Baseline (day 1) compared to the cell composition measured at Visit 3—End of treatment (day 84). The change in percentage of superficial, parabasal, and intermediate cells obtained from the vaginal mucosal epithelium from a vaginal smear was recorded. Results from these assessments for superficial cells are presented in Table 46 and Table 47, as well as
Superficial cells
The study showed the formulations disclosed herein across all doses increased the percentage of superficial cells across all dosages in a statistically significant way.
Parabasal Cells
The increase of superficial cells and decrease of parabasal cells showed statistical significance over placebo at week 2 and for every week thereafter, including at week 12. Administration of the pharmaceutical formulation resulted in rapid onset of action, as early as two weeks after the initial administration. Rapid onset of action may be coupled with the rapid absorption demonstrated in the pharmacokinetic data presented below.
pH
Vaginal pH was measured at Screening and Visit 6—End of treatment (day 84). The pH measurement was obtained as disclosed herein. Results from these assessments are presented in Table 50 and Table 51, and
The decrease in vaginal pH was observed at statistically significant levels at week 2 and through the end of the study. Surprisingly, the pH decreased in all three pharmaceutical formulations tested and at all three dosages of over a full pH unit for all three doses.
Most Bothersome Symptoms
Dyspareunia
Subjects were asked to specify the symptom that she identified as the “most bothersome symptom.” During the screening period all of the subjects were provided with a questionnaire to self-assess the symptoms of VVA: (1) dyspareunia; (2) vaginal dryness; and (3) vaginal or vulvar irritation, burning, or itching. Each symptom was measured on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Each subject was given a questionnaire at each visit and the responses were recorded. All randomized subjects were also provided a questionnaire to self-assess the symptoms of VVA at Visit 1 and on each subsequent visit through Visit 6—End of the treatment (day 84). Subjects recorded their self-assessments daily in a diary and answers were collected on visits 8 and 15 (end of treatment). Pre-dose evaluation results obtained at Visit 1 were considered as baseline data for the statistical analyses. Data from these assessments for dyspareunia are presented in Table 52 and Table 53. Data from these assessments for dryness are presented in Table 54 and Table 55.
Each of the 4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg formulations tests demonstrated an early onset of action at week 2 for the most bothersome symptom of dyspareunia, evidenced by the statistically significant results (measured by p-value) in Table 52. After two weeks, each dose demonstrated separation from placebo in improvement in the most bothersome symptom of dyspareunia.
Coupled with the PK data presented below, these results show that the formulations disclosed herein provide a bolus of estradiol within two hours of administration, which resulted in a decrease in the severity of dyspareunia as early as two weeks later. Estradiol is rapidly absorbed at around two hours, which is significantly faster than the formulations of the prior art that sought an extended release profile. The rapid absorption of estradiol is believed to be a result of administration with a liquid formulation.
Surprisingly, the 4 μg formulation showed clinical effectiveness at two weeks along with the 25 μg and 10 μg dosage levels. These data demonstrate that 4 μg is an effective dose, and can be effective as early as two weeks after administration for the most bothersome symptom of dyspareunia.
Dryness
Each of the 4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg formulations tests demonstrated an early onset of action at week 2 for the most bothersome symptom of dryness, evidenced by the statistically significant results (measured by p-value) in Table 54. After two weeks, each dose demonstrated separation from placebo in improvement in the most bothersome symptom of dryness.
Irritation/Itching
Vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation significantly improved (p<0.05) for 10 μg at weeks 8 and 12, and for 25 μg at week 12. Moreover, the trend for 4 μg was an improvement in itching week over week to nearly being statistically significant at week 12.
Coupled with the PK data presented below, these results show that the formulations disclosed herein provide a bolus of estradiol within two hours of administration, which resulted in a decrease in the severity of dryness as early as two weeks later. Estradiol is rapidly absorbed at around two hours, which is significantly faster than the formulations of the prior art that sought an extended release profile. The rapid absorption of estradiol is believed to be a result of administration with a liquid formulation.
Surprisingly, the 4 μg formulation showed clinical effectiveness at two weeks along with the 25 μg and 10 μg dosage levels. These data demonstrate that 4 μg is an effective dose, and can be effective as early as two weeks after administration for the most bothersome symptom of dryness.
As described above, each dose was compared with placebo for change from baseline to week 12 in the percentages of vaginal superficial cells and parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and severity of dyspareunia (co-primary endpoints). The proportion of responders (defined as women with ≥2 of the following at week 12: vaginal superficial cells >5%, vaginal pH<5.0, ≥1 category improvement from baseline dyspareunia score) was compared in TX-004HR groups vs placebo. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of co-primary endpoints were analyzed by age (≤56 years, 57-61 years, and ≥62 years), BMI (≤24 kg/m2, 25-28 kg/m2, and ≥29 kg/m2), uterine status, parity, and vaginal births. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were compared with placebo in a sub-analysis of the main study.
The proportion of responders was significantly higher for all TX-004HR dose groups vs placebo (p<0.0001 for all). All TX-004HR doses vs placebo significantly improved percentage of superficial and parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and severity of dyspareunia at 12 weeks. Subgroup analyses showed generally similar results for percentage of superficial and parabasal cells and vaginal pH irrespective of age, BMI, uterine status, parity, and vaginal births. Severity of dyspareunia was significantly reduced at 12 weeks with all TX-004HR doses vs placebo in most subgroups (Table 57A).
The PK sub-analysis (n=72), described in more detail below, found AUC and Cavg parameters for E2 and estrone (E1) with 4 μg and 10 μg TX-004HR to be similar to placebo. Increases occurred in E2 AUC and Cavg with 25 μg vs placebo but remained within the normal postmenopausal range. E2 levels at day 84 were similar between the TX-004HR groups and placebo, indicating no systemic drug accumulation.
All doses of TX-004HR were associated with robust efficacy and demonstrated a statistically significant difference vs placebo for increasing superficial cells, decreasing parabasal cells and vaginal pH, and reducing the severity of dyspareunia. Age, BMI, uterine status, parity and vaginal births generally did not affect TX-004HR efficacy. These results occurred with negligible systemic absorption of TX-004HR estradiol doses of 4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg.
†p < 0.01;
‡p < 0.001;
§p < 0.0001 vs placebo.
Visual evaluation of the vaginal epithelium, a secondary endpoint of the trial, was performed during gynecological examinations at baseline and weeks 2, 6, 8, and 12. A four-point score (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to assess changes in vaginal color, vaginal epithelial integrity, vaginal epithelial surface thickness, and vaginal secretions. Change from baseline to each time point was compared with placebo using the mixed effect model repeat measurement (MMRM) analysis.
At baseline, women had mean scores of 1.8 for vaginal color, 1.5 for epithelial integrity, 1.9 for epithelial surface thickness, and 1.7 for secretions. These scores were consistent with VVA reflecting pallor, diminished vaginal wall integrity and thickness, and secretions. Significant improvements from baseline at weeks 2, 6, 8 and 12 (Table 57B;
A direct correlation was observed between the total sum of the individual visual examination score and severity of dyspareunia (r=0.31; P<0.0001) as well as the severity of vaginal dryness (r=0.38; P<0.0001) at 12 weeks when all subjects were analyzed independent of treatment. See,
Since visual inspection of the vagina with the 4-point assessment tool positively correlated with dyspareunia and vaginal dryness in this study, this tool may help healthcare professionals diagnose VVA and assess its treatment, and provide a vehicle for health care professionals to initiation discussion with their patients about a sensitive topic. Several large-scale studies have shown that it is difficult for patients to discuss vulvovaginal health openly with their health care professionals because they are either embarrassed, uninformed about VVA and its treatments, or believe that the topic is not appropriate for discussion. Therefore, of the 50% of postmenopausal women who have symptoms of VVA, far fewer seek treatment. Visual examination of the vagina may help practitioners identify women at risk of dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, and allow them to proactively engage women in conversations about VVA symptoms such as dyspareunia and dryness and discuss available treatment options.
While some approved local estrogens effectively treat VVA, systemic estradiol may increase with local administration. TX-004HR is a new low-dose vaginal softgel capsule containing solubilized natural estradiol designed to provide excellent efficacy with negligible systemic absorption. Up to three times lower systemic estrogen levels were previously reported with TX-004HR vs an approved low-dose vaginal estradiol tablet. The present studies show that VVA efficacy can be achieved with negligible systemic absorption as measured by PK in postmenopausal women with moderate-to-severe dyspareunia.
The terms “minimal systemic effect,” “low systemic absorption,” and “negligible systemic absorption,” as used herein, mean that the disclosed formulations and methods result in low to minimal absorption of estradiol in women, especially women with VVA and/or dyspareunia. In fact, it has surprisingly been found that the disclosed formulations and methods result in negligible to very low systemic absorption of estradiol, which remains in the postmenopausal range. The finding is borne out by the examples provided herein that demonstrate that the Cmax and AUC levels of estradiol relative to placebo were not statistically differentiable, which indicates that the formulations disclosed herein have a negligible systemic effect. As such, the disclosed formulations and methods advantageously provide local benefits in patients with VVA and/or dyspareunia (i.e., the disclosed formulations are extremely effective in increasing the superficial cells, decreasing parabasal cells, and decreasing pH) without increasing systemic levels.
A PK substudy was part of a large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TX-004HR (4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg) compared with placebo for treating postmenopausal moderate-to-severe dyspareunia. Women received TX-004HR or placebo once daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly for 10 wks.
In this study, the systemic exposure to estradiol following once daily intravaginal administration of estradiol 25 μg, 10 μg, 4 μg, and placebo were investigated on days 1, 14, and 84 as described herein. Descriptive statistics of the plasma estradiol concentrations taken at each sampling time and the observed Cmax values were recorded, as shown in the tables below and
For PK, serum was sampled pre-dose and at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 h post-dose on days 1 and 14 for estradiol, estrone (E1), and estrone conjugates (E1Cs). Baseline-adjusted results are shown here; unadjusted data will be presented. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to week 12 for vaginal superficial cells (%), vaginal parabasal cells (%), vaginal pH, and severity of dyspareunia. Secondary endpoints were severity of dryness and itching/irritation. Blood chemistry was tested at week 12.
The substudy randomized 72 women (mean age 59 y) at 11 centers. Mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and average concentration (Cavg) for estradiol were not significantly different vs placebo with 4 μg and 10 μg TX-004HR, but were significantly higher with 25 μg at day 1 (AUC 130 vs 13.8 h*pg/mL and Cavg 5.4 vs 0.4 pg/mL) and day 14 (AUC 84.6 vs 7.1 h*pg/mL and Cavg 3.5 vs −0.2 pg/mL).
Mean estradiol peak concentration (Cmax) was not significantly different with 4 μg (day 1: 2.6 pg/mL; day 14: 1.3 pg/mL) vs placebo (day 1: 2.1 pg/mL; day 14: 1.0 pg/mL), and although significant, was negligible with 10 μg (day 1: 6.0 pg/mL; day 14: 3.0 pg/mL) and very low for 25 μg (day 1: 26.2 pg/mL; day 14: 12.0 pg/mL).
E1 and E1Cs AUC, Cavg, Cmax, Cmin did not differ vs placebo, except for E1Cs on day 1 when AUC was significantly higher with 25 μg (2454 vs 83.0 h*pg/mL), Cmax with 10 μg and 25 μg (90.2 and 198.6 pg/mL, respectively vs 27.1 pg/mL), and Cavg with 10 μg (8.0 vs −33.7 pg/mL).
In the overall study TX004-HR showed robust efficacy for symptoms of dyspareunia, vaginal dryness and irritation at 12 weeks with all 3 doses compared with placebo.
Vaginal TX-004HR resulted in negligible to very low systemic absorption of estradiol, which remained in the postmenopausal range. TX-004HR improved the signs and symptoms of VVA. This study supports local benefits of estradiol without increasing systemic exposure.
The pharmacokinetic data for estradiol demonstrates the rapid absorption of the formulations disclosed herein for all three doses. Surprisingly, while the pharmacokinetic data was extremely low for all three doses, each dose was extremely effective in increasing the superficial cells, decreasing parabasal cells, and decreasing pH.
The pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein provide an improved safety profile over other options for treating VVA. The combination of low systemic estradiol, while retaining efficacy was a surprising result for all three doses.
Estradiol Concentration
Estradiol Area Under the Curve (0-24 Hours)
Estradiol Cmax
Estradiol Cavg
Estradiol Tmax
Estrone Concentration
Estrone Area Under the Curve (0-24 Hours)
Estrone Cmax
Estrone Cavg
Estrone Tmax
Estrone Conjugates
Estrone Conjugates Area Under the Curve (0-24 Hours)
Estrone Conjugates Cmax
Estrone Conjugates Cavg
Estrone Conjugates Tmax
In the phase 3 trial, all doses of TX-004HR compared with placebo (MITT n=747) significantly improved the 4 co-primary endpoints at week 2 through week 12, as well as the secondary endpoints of vaginal dryness by week 6 and vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation by week 12 (except 4 μg, p=0.0503), and was well-tolerated with no treatment-related serious AEs reported. The phase 3 PK study (n=72) showed no difference in systemic E2 levels for 4 μg and 10 μg TX-004HR vs placebo, as measured by AUC and Cavg. E2 AUC and Cavg with 25 μg TX-004HR was higher than placebo, but average concentrations remained within the normal postmenopausal range (Table 142). E2 levels at day 84 were similar to placebo indicating no systemic drug accumulation. SHBG concentrations did not change with treatment. The two phase 2 studies (n=36 for each) of TX-004HR 10 μg and 25 μg resulted in statistically significantly lower E2 absorption than an approved E2 tablet at identical doses, with 25 μg TX-004HR demonstrating AUC less than ⅓ that of the approved product (Table 143).
With robust efficacy demonstrated as early as 2 weeks and up to 12 weeks at all 3 doses, TX-004HR 4 μg and 10 μg showed negligible systemic E2 absorption, while 25 μg resulted in very low systemic absorption of E2 in the phase 3 trial. TX-004HR 10 μg and 25 showed lower systemic E2 exposure than equivalent doses of an approved E2 tablet. The absence of clinically meaningful increases in E2 concentrations paired with data consistent with a lack of systemic effects (e.g., no increase in SHBG) shows that TX-004 HR delivers excellent efficacy with negligible to very low systemic exposure.
The impact of normal daily activities for 4 hours post dose was evaluated, in comparison with the impact of remaining in the supine position for 4 hours post dose on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of TX-004HR 25 mcg. In two studies, at the same site, the same sixteen healthy postmenopausal female subjects were fasted for at least 10 hours prior to dosing through 4 hours following dosing. Subjects received a 25 mcg dose of TX-004HR administered intravaginally by trained female study personnel. Following their first dose, the subjects were required to remain in a supine position for 4 hours following dosing. Following the second dose, after 5 minutes resting time, the subjects were instructed to be ambulatory in the clinic and refrain from reclining for the 4 hours following dosing. Blood samples were collected at pre-defined intervals up to 24 hours after dosing. Plasma samples were analyzed for estradiol using LC-MS/MS. See, e.g.,
The mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of estradiol was not significantly different with ambulation than with supination. On an individual subject basis, the majority showed similar Cmax and AUC0-24 levels with ambulation as with supination. There were no signs of posture having an effect on absorption rate as evidenced by the similarity in group average and individual subject Tmax. In addition, there was no difference between the group mean profiles when compared on an individual time point basis, further demonstrating that posture had no effect on absorption. The systemic exposure of estradiol in TX-004HR 25 mcg was generally low and occurred regardless of whether the subjects were ambulatory or supine for 4 hours after dosing. An important advantage of the formulation is that a woman can be ambulatory almost immediately after the formulation is administered, as opposed to other known formulations that require a subject to remain in a supine position after administration. Generally, other known formulations direct administration before bed at night because of the requirement to be supine, which requirement is unnecessary in the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein because the pharmaceutical compositions disclosed herein adhere to the vaginal tissue, the capsule dissolves rapidly, and the formulation is released into the vagina and rapidly absorbed by the vaginal tissue. Because activity level does not adversely affect the systemic absorption of estradiol, the formulation of the invention gives the patient more flexibility with her dosing regimen.
Safety endpoints in the study included vital signs, clinical laboratory tests (blood chemistry, hematology, hormone levels, urine analysis), ECG, physical and gynecological examination findings, pap smears, endometrial biopsies, and adverse events (AEs). AEs included undesirable medical conditions occurring at any time during all study phases including the washout period, whether or not a study treatment had been administered. An AE was considered treatment emergent if it occurred after study drug administration, or if it was pre-existing and worsened during 120 days post-dose follow up. Participants were given a diary with instructions to record product use, sexual activity, symptoms/complaints, and other medications. AEs, concomitant medications, and vital signs were recorded and assessed at each study visit from screening to week 12.
TX-004HR had a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated. No clinically significant differences in AEs were observed between treatment and placebo groups (Table 144). Headache was the most commonly reported TEAE, followed by vaginal discharge, nasopharyngitis, and vulvovaginal pruritus (Table 144). Headache was the only treatment-related TEAE that was numerically more frequent in women receiving TX-004HR than those receiving placebo (3.7% for 4-μg dose vs 3.1% for placebo). Vaginal discharge was reported by numerically fewer women in any of the TX-004HR groups than by women in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. Few participants (1.8%) discontinued the study due to AEs.
Nine serious TEAEs were reported in 8 subjects; however, none were considered related to treatment. Complete heart block, appendicitis, endophthalmitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were each reported by a different participant in the 25 μg group. Sinus node dysfunction and ankle fracture were both reported for one women, and arthralgia and malignant melanoma were each reported for one women in the 10 μg group. None of the women in the 4 μg group had reports of serious TEAEs. One woman in the placebo group was reported to have a cervical myelopathy. No deaths occurred during the study.
No diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy from endometrial biopsies were observed at week 12. Total cholesterol numerically decreased from baseline to week 12 by a mean of 0.024 mmol/L to 0.07 mmol/L in the treatment groups, and by 0.008 mmol/L in the placebo group. No clinically meaningful increases in triglycerides were observed in any active treatment groups compared with placebo. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations (measured in a subset of 72 women) did not increase with treatment relative to placebo or baseline at week 12. No clinically significant changes in any laboratory parameters were found.
The phase 3 clinical trial demonstrated that TX-004HR at 4 μg, 10 μg, and 25 μg doses is safe and effective for treating vaginal changes and self-reported symptoms of VVA in postmenopausal women. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in all of the 4 pre-specified co-primary endpoints (increase in the percentage of vaginal superficial cells, decrease in the percentage of vaginal parabasal cells and vaginal pH, and decrease in severity of the MBS of dyspareunia) occurred as early as 2 weeks with all 3 doses of TX-004HR as compared with placebo, and were sustained throughout the 12-week trial. Additionally, improvements were found for the secondary endpoints of vaginal dryness and vulvar or vaginal irritation and itching. These improvements were achieved without increasing systemic estrogen concentrations (4 μg and 10 μg) or with negligible (25 μg) systemic estrogen exposure, as found in pharmacokinetic studies. TX-004HR was also well-tolerated with no clinically significant differences found between treatment and placebo groups in any AEs or treatment-related AEs, and no treatment-related serious AEs.
The results demonstrate early onset of action in the clinical signs of VVA with statistically significantly improved changes compared with placebo. The efficacy results here were somewhat numerically higher than data from a 12-week, randomized, controlled trial that compared a 10-μg vaginal estradiol tablet with placebo, which showed significant improvements in the percentages of superficial and parabasal cells, and in pH compared with placebo (see, Simon et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112:1053-1060). At 12 weeks, improvements were smaller with the 10-μg estradiol tablet (change of 13% in superficial cells, −37% in parabasal cells, and −1.3 in vaginal pH) than what was observed in this study with the 10-μg TX-004HR dose (change of 17% in superficial cells, −44% in parabasal cells, and −1.4 in vaginal pH). While improvements in some objective (cell and pH) endpoints were seen with the estradiol tablet within 2 weeks of treatment, the patient-reported improvements in a composite score of subjective symptoms were not observed until 8 weeks of therapy, which can be perceived as a disadvantage for many users. That clinical trial did not assess individual symptoms. A second randomized, controlled trial of 10-μg and 25-μg estradiol tablets similarly did not find significant improvements over placebo in the composite score of vaginal symptoms with either dose until 7 weeks of treatment (week 2, NS). Likewise, the SERM, ospemifene, was evaluated in a clinical trial for the treatment of dyspareunia, and statistically significant improvements were not observed until week 12. See, Bachmann et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:67-76; Portman et al. Menopause. 2013; 20:623-630.
Importantly, the results reported here showed significant improvement in dyspareunia within 2 weeks with all 3 doses of TX-004HR, with reductions in severity scores from 1.5 to 1.7 points at week 12, which were comparable or superior to reductions of 1.2 to 1.6 points reported for other currently approved dyspareunia treatments. See, VAGIFEM® (estradiol vaginal tablets) Prescribing Information. Bagsvaerd, Denmark: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2012; PREMARIN® (conjugated estrogens tablets, USP) Prescribing Information. Philadelphia, Pa.: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2010; OSPHENA® (ospemifene) tablets, for oral use. Prescribing Information. Shionogi, Inc. 2013.
Additionally, vaginal dryness improved from week 2 with 10 μg and 25 μg TX-004HR. None of the currently available products reported as early an onset of action for the symptom of vaginal dryness associated with VVA as did TX-004HR. Furthermore, TX-004HR 10 μg and 25 μg showed significant improvement in vaginal irritation and/or itching at week 12, while none of the currently available products on the market are reported to improve these symptoms. See, Portman et al. Maturitas. 2014; 78:91-98; Eriksen et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992; 44:137-144.
Based on a large survey of postmenopausal women in the United States, only a small proportion (7%) of women are thought to receive prescription vaginal estrogen therapy alone for their VVA, probably due to lack of information about available treatments, avoidance of discussion of the topic with health care practitioners, or dissatisfaction with currently available products (see, e.g., Kingsberg et al. J Sex Med. 2013; 10:1790-1799). Eliminating the need for an applicator or individually measuring doses is intended to give women a more positive user experience and thus potentially better compliance, resulting in overall better efficacy of treatment.
The results with TX-004HR in this study exemplify one of the advantages of local vaginal estrogen therapies: rapid symptom resolution without increasing systemic estrogen concentrations. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and average concentration (Cavg) for estradiol were not significantly different from placebo with 4 μg and 10 μg TX-004HR. Although statistically higher AUC for estradiol was observed with the 25 dose, estradiol levels remained within the postmenopausal range with no evidence of accumulation by day 84. Although there was negligible systemic absorption, rapid efficacy was observed within 2 weeks of dosing with all doses of TX-004HR.
TX-004HR was well-tolerated. The 4 most commonly reported TEAEs, including vaginal discharge and vulvovaginal pruritus, were experienced by fewer women in any TX-004HR group than in the placebo group, and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. By comparison, in a 12-week study of the efficacy of ospemifene, vaginal discharge was reported more than 6-times more frequently in the ospemifene group than in the placebo group (see, Portman et al. Menopause. 2013; 20:623-630). Genital pruritus was also reported 4-times more frequently in women treated with Vagifem 10-μg tablets than with placebo in a 12-month randomized study (see, Vagifem® (estradiol vaginal tablets) Prescribing Information. Bagsvaerd, Denmark: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2012). Importantly, endometrial findings after TX-004HR were benign as no hyperplasia or malignancies were reported in biopsies at 12 weeks. Onset of effect was seen as early as 2 weeks and was maintained throughout the study. TX-004HR was well tolerated as reported here and systemic estrogen exposure was negligible to very low as demonstrated by the pharmacokinetic study.
The trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, phase 3 study. Treatments were self-administered vaginally, once daily, for 2 weeks and then twice weekly, for 10 weeks. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) was evaluated using the multidimensional Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) at baseline and at week 12. The FSFI is a brief, validated, self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 19 questions designed to assess the areas of arousal, desire, orgasm, lubrication, and pain. The Index defines sexual dysfunction by a total FSFI score (the sum of the individual domain scores) of ≤26.55 out of a possible maximum score of 36.
Postmenopausal women (40-75 years; BMI≤38 kg/m2) were included if they had ≤5% superficial cells on vaginal cytological smear; vaginal pH>5.0; self-identified most bothersome symptom (MBS) of moderate-to severe dyspareunia; and anticipated sexual activity (with vaginal penetration) during the trial period. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) treatments, including vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, were discontinued within 7 days prior to screening. Use of oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or SERM-containing drug products were prohibited within 8 weeks of study start. Changes from baseline in total and individual domain FSFI scores for each dose were compared with placebo using ANCOVA with baseline as a covariate.
764 postmenopausal women were randomized to 4 μg (n=191), 10 μg (n=191), or 25 μg (n=190) vaginal estradiol softgel capsules or placebo (n=192). The majority of the women were white (87%) with a mean age of 59 years and a mean BMI of 26.7 kg/m2 (Table 145). The FSFI questionnaire was completed by those who were not in the PK sub-study (n=692; 90.6%). The average baseline total FSFI score of 14.8 for all women indicated FSD in the subjects.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) total summary score is a numerically continuous measure that was descriptively summarized at Visits 2 and 6 and the change in the total summary score (Visit 6 minus Visit 2) was also descriptively summarized. The domain sub-scores and the changes in the domain sub-scores were also descriptively summarized. Summaries were by treatment arm, and all active treatment arms combined.
In addition, the change in mean from baseline of each active treatment group from the placebo group for each numerically continuous endpoint was evaluated. The least square (LS) mean changes and the 95% CI for the difference in LS Mean changes between treated and placebo are provided. The FSFI Questionnaire consists of 19 questions divided among 6 domains, and has a minimum total score of 2.0 and a maximum score of 36.0 points. The FSFI questionnaire was administered to the randomized population except for those subjects in the PK sub-study. At Baseline, the overall mean Total Score was 14.8 (14.8 for the 4 μg group; 15.8 for the 10 μg group; 14.2 for the 25 μg group; and 14.4 for the placebo group). The LS mean change in the FSFI Total Score and domain scores from Baseline to Week 12 are summarized in Table 146.
Change from Baseline to Week 12 in FSFI total score and domains compared to placebo was assessed.
After 12 weeks, total FSFI scores numerically improved from baseline in all groups, including placebo. Total FSFI score significantly increased with the 10 μg group (P<0.05) and the 25 μg group (P=0.0019) versus placebo (
FSFI lubrication and pain domain scores improved numerically in all groups including placebo from baseline to 12 weeks; improvements for the 10 μg group and the 25 μg group were statistically significantly greater than with placebo (
While the pharmaceutical compositions and methods have been described in terms of what are presently considered to be practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the disclosure need not be limited to the disclosed embodiments. It is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the claims, the scope of which should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar embodiments. This disclosure includes any and all embodiments of the following claims.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/521,230, filed Oct. 22, 2014; and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 62/264,309, filed Dec. 7, 2015; U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 62/296,552, filed Feb. 17, 2016; U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 62/324,838, filed Apr. 19, 2016; U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 62/329,940, filed Apr. 29, 2016; and U.S. Provisional Pat. Appl. No. 62/348,820, filed Jun. 10, 2016; which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1967351 | Doisy | Jan 1934 | A |
| 2232438 | Butenandt | Feb 1941 | A |
| 2379832 | Serini et al. | Jul 1945 | A |
| 2649399 | Beall et al. | Aug 1953 | A |
| 3198707 | Nomine et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3478070 | Stein et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3526648 | Bertin et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3710795 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3729560 | Hagerman | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3729566 | Ericsson et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3755573 | Berman | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3755575 | Lerner | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3903880 | Higuchi et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3916898 | Robinson | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3921636 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3923997 | Meuly | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3948254 | Zaffaroni | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3971367 | Zaffaroni | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3977404 | Theeuwes | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3993072 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4008719 | Theeuwes et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4012496 | Schopflin et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4014334 | Theeuwes et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4014987 | Heller et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4016251 | Higuchi et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4071623 | van der Vies | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4093709 | Choi et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4154820 | Simoons | May 1979 | A |
| 4155991 | Schopflin et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4196188 | Besins | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4215691 | Wong | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4237885 | Wong et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4310510 | Sherman et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4327725 | Cortese et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4372951 | Vorys | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4384096 | Sonnabend | May 1983 | A |
| 4393871 | Vorhauer et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4402695 | Wong | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4423151 | Baranczuk | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4449980 | Millar et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4610687 | Fogwell | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4629449 | Wong | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4732763 | Beck et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738957 | Laurent et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4756907 | Beck et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762717 | Crowley, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4788062 | Gale et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4816257 | Buster et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4822616 | Zimmermann et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4865848 | Cheng et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4900734 | Maxson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4906475 | Kim | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4942158 | Sarpotdar et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4961931 | Wong | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5030629 | Rajadhyaksha | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5064654 | Berner et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5108995 | Casper | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5128138 | Blank | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5130137 | Crowley, Jr. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5140021 | Maxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5164416 | Nagai et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5208225 | Boissonneault et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5211952 | Spicer et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5252334 | Chiang et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5280023 | Ehrlich et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5288496 | Lewis | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5340584 | Spicer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340585 | Pike et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340586 | Pike et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5362497 | Yamada et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5382573 | Casper | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5393528 | Staab | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5393529 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5419910 | Lewis | May 1995 | A |
| 5468736 | Hodgen | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474783 | Miranda et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480776 | Dullien | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5514673 | Heckenmueller et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5516528 | Hughes et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5527534 | Myhling | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5529782 | Staab | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5538736 | Barth et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543150 | Bologna et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5547948 | Barcomb | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5556635 | Grognet et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5565199 | Page et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567831 | Li | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569652 | Beier et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5580572 | Liorzou et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5582592 | Kendrick | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5585370 | Casper | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5595759 | Wright et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5595970 | Garfield et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5605702 | Math et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607691 | Solas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5607693 | Bonte et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609617 | Cady et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620705 | Dong et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5626866 | Heiber et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5629021 | Wright | May 1997 | A |
| 5633011 | Dong et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633242 | Oettel et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639743 | Kaswan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5653983 | Bonte et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5656286 | Miranda et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660839 | Allec et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662927 | Ehrlich et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5663160 | Dumas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676968 | Lipp et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677292 | Li et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5686097 | Crisologo et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693335 | Xia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5694947 | Lehtinen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700480 | Hille et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5709844 | Arbeit et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719197 | Mantelle et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5735801 | Caillouette | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5739176 | Dunn et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5744463 | Bair | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747058 | Tipton et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762614 | Caillouette | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770176 | Nargessi | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770219 | Chiang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770220 | Meconi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770227 | Dong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776495 | Duclos et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5780044 | Tipton et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5780050 | Jain et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788980 | Nabahi | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5788984 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5789442 | Garfield et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5811416 | Chwalisz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5811547 | Nakamichi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814329 | Shah | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820878 | Shinmura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827200 | Caillouette | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5840327 | Gale et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843468 | Yum et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843979 | Wille et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5858394 | Lipp et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5863552 | Yue | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866603 | Li et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5869084 | Paradissis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5882676 | Yum et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5885612 | Meconi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888533 | Dunn | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891462 | Carrara | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891868 | Cummings et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898038 | Yallampalli et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902603 | Chen et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904931 | Gunther et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906830 | Farinas et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5912010 | Wille et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916176 | Caillouette | Jun 1999 | A |
| RE36247 | Plunkett et al. | Jul 1999 | E |
| 5919477 | Bevan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5922349 | Elliesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928666 | Farinas et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942243 | Shah | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942531 | Diaz | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5952000 | Fikstad et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958446 | Miranda et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5962445 | Stewart | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968919 | Gyurik et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972372 | Saleh et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5985311 | Cordes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985850 | Falk et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985861 | Levine et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993856 | Ragavan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989568 | de Lacharriere et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001846 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6007835 | Bon Lapillonne et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010715 | Pollock et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6013276 | Teillaud et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6022562 | Autant et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024974 | Li | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024976 | Miranda et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028057 | Burns | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030948 | Mann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039968 | Nabahi | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040340 | Garfield et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6056972 | Hermsmeyer | May 2000 | A |
| 6060077 | Meignant | May 2000 | A |
| 6068853 | Berner et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6074625 | Hawthorne et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077531 | Salin-Drouin | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080118 | Blythe | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6083178 | Caillouette | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086916 | Agnus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6087352 | Trout | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6090404 | Meconi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096338 | Lacy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6106848 | Willcox et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117446 | Place | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117450 | Dittgen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124362 | Bradbury et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6133251 | Dittgen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6133320 | Yallampalli et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139868 | Hoffmann | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139873 | Hughes, Jr. et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6149935 | Tenzel et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153216 | Cordes et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165491 | Grasset et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165975 | Adams et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6187323 | Aiache et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6187339 | de Haan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190331 | Caillouette | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201072 | Rathi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217886 | Rubinstein et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225297 | Stockemann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6227202 | Matapurkar | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228383 | Hansen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228852 | Shaak | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6242509 | Macqueen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245811 | Horrobin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6262115 | Guittard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267984 | Hamlin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6274165 | Meconi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277418 | Marakverich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283927 | Caillouette | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6284263 | Place | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287588 | Shih et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287693 | Savoir et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294188 | Ragavan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294192 | Patel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6294550 | Place et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299900 | Reed et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303132 | Nelson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303588 | Danielov | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306841 | Place et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306914 | de Ziegler et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309669 | Setterstrom et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309848 | Howett et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312703 | Orthoefer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328987 | Marini | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6342491 | Dey et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344211 | Hille | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6372209 | Chrisope | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372245 | Vo et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6372246 | Wei et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6387390 | Deaver et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402705 | Caillouette | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416778 | Ragavan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6420352 | Knowles | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423039 | Rathbone et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423683 | Heaton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432438 | Shukla | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436633 | Kreider et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440454 | Santoro et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444224 | Rathbone et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6444234 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451300 | Leyba et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451339 | Patel et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6451779 | Hesch | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455246 | Howett et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6455517 | Tanabe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465004 | Houze et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465005 | Biali et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465006 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468526 | Chrisope | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6469016 | Place et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6472434 | Place et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6479232 | Howett et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6495160 | Esposito et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6500814 | Hesch | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503896 | Tanabe et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6511969 | Hermsmeyer | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6521250 | Seibertz et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6526980 | Tracy et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6528094 | Savoir et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6531149 | Meconi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6537580 | Savoir et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6538039 | Laurent | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6544196 | Caillouette | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6544553 | Hsia et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6548053 | Murray et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6548491 | Tanabe et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551611 | Elliesen et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6555131 | Wolff et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562367 | Wolff et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6562370 | Luo et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6562790 | Chein | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6569463 | Patel et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6583129 | Mazer et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6586006 | Roser et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589549 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6593317 | de Ziegler et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6599519 | Seo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6610652 | Adams et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610670 | Bickensfeld et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610674 | Schreiber | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6635274 | Carter et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638528 | Kanios | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638536 | Savoir et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6645528 | Straub et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6649155 | Dunlop et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6653298 | Potter et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6656929 | Agnus et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660726 | Hill et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663608 | Rathbone | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663895 | Savoir et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6682757 | Wright | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6692763 | Cummings et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6708822 | Muni | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6720001 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6737081 | Savoir et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6740333 | Beckett et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743448 | Kryger | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6743815 | Huebner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6747018 | Tanabe et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6750291 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6756208 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6776164 | Bunt et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787152 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805877 | Massara et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809085 | Elson et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6818226 | Reed et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6821524 | Marini | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6841716 | Tsutsumi | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6844334 | Hill et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6855703 | Hill et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6860859 | Mehrotra et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866865 | Hsia et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6869969 | Heubner et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878518 | Whitehead | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6901278 | Notelovitz | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6905705 | Palm et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911211 | Tamarkin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911438 | Wright | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6923988 | Patel et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6924274 | Lardy et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6932983 | Straub et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6939558 | Massara et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6943021 | Klausner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6958327 | Hillisch et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6960337 | Pike et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6962691 | Lulla et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6962908 | Aloba et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6967194 | Matsuo et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6974569 | Boyd et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6977250 | Rodriguez | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978945 | Wong et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6995149 | Reilhac et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7004321 | Hackbarth et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7005429 | Dey et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011846 | Shojaei et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018992 | Koch et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7030104 | Paris et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7030157 | Ke et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| RE39104 | Duclos et al. | May 2006 | E |
| 7074779 | Sui et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083590 | Bunt et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7091213 | Metcalf, III et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7094228 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7097853 | Keister et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7101342 | Caillouette | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7105573 | Krajcik et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7135190 | Piao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7153522 | Ikeura et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7163681 | Giles-Komar et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163699 | Besse | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7175850 | Cevc | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7179799 | Hill et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7196074 | Blye et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198800 | Ko | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7198801 | Carrara et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7226910 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7247625 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250446 | Sangita et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7267829 | Kirby et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7300926 | Prokai et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7303763 | Ho | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7317037 | Fensome et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7329654 | Kanojia et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7335650 | Potter et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7374779 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7378404 | Peters et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7381427 | Ancira et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7387789 | Klose et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7388006 | Schmees et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7414043 | Kosemund et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7427413 | Savoir et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7427609 | Leonard | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7429576 | Labrie | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7431941 | Besins et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7456159 | Houze et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7459445 | Hill et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7465587 | Imrich | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7470433 | Carrara et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7485666 | Villaneuva et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7497855 | Ausiello et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7498303 | Arnold et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7534765 | Gregg et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7534780 | Ring et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7550142 | Giles-Komar et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7563565 | Matsuo et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7569274 | Alphonse et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7572779 | Aloba et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7572780 | Hermsmeyer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7589082 | Savoir et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7671027 | Loumaye | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7674783 | Hermsmeyer | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687281 | Roth et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7687485 | Levinson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7694683 | Callister et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7704983 | Hodgen et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7727720 | Dhallan | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7732408 | Josephson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7749989 | Hill et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7767656 | Shoichet et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7799769 | White et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7815936 | Hasenzahl et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815949 | Cohen | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7829115 | Besins et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7829116 | Frye et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| RE42012 | Deaver et al. | Dec 2010 | E |
| 7850992 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7854753 | Kraft et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7858607 | Mamchur | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| RE42072 | Deaver et al. | Jan 2011 | E |
| 7862552 | McIntyre et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7867990 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7871643 | Lizio et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7879830 | Wiley | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7884093 | Creasy et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7925519 | Greene | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7939104 | Barbera et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943602 | Bunschoten et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7943604 | Coelingh Bennink et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7945459 | Grace et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7960368 | Rao et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7989436 | Hill et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7989487 | Welsh et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8022053 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8048017 | Xu | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8048869 | Bunschoten et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8063030 | Ellman | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8071576 | Visser et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8071729 | Giles-Komar et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8075916 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8075917 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8076317 | Kulmann | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8076319 | Leonard | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8080553 | Auspitz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088605 | Beudet et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8096940 | Iverson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101209 | Legrand et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8101773 | Smith et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8114152 | Furst | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8114434 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8114442 | Tucker et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8119741 | Pavlin | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8121886 | Azar | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124118 | Lennernaes et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8124595 | Boissonneault | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8147561 | Binmoeller | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8148546 | Baasner et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8158613 | Staniforth et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8158614 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8163722 | Savoir et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8177449 | Watkinson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182833 | Hermsmeyer | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187615 | Friedman | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187640 | Dunn | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8195403 | Wood, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8202736 | Mousa et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8217024 | Ahmed et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8221785 | Chien | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8222008 | Thoene | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8222237 | Narkunan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8227454 | Hill et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8227509 | Castro et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8241664 | Dudley et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8247393 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8257724 | Cromack et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8257725 | Cromack et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268352 | Karan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268806 | Labrie | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8268878 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8273730 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8287888 | Song et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8288366 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8318898 | Fasel et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8324193 | Lee et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8329680 | Evans et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8337814 | Osbakken et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8344007 | Chui et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8349820 | Zeun et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8353863 | Imran | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8357723 | Satyam | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8361995 | Schramm | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8362091 | Besonov et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8372424 | Berry et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8372806 | Bragagna et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8377482 | Laurie et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8377994 | Drechsler et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8394759 | Barathur et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8415332 | Reape et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8420111 | Hermsmeyer | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435561 | Besins et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8435972 | Sayeed et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8449879 | Laurent et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8450108 | Boyce | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8454945 | Narain et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8455468 | Kellermann et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8461138 | Boissonneault | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8476252 | Pickersgill et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8481488 | Carter | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8486374 | Zlatkis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8486442 | Yamaji et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8492368 | Lewandowski et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8507467 | Ueda et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512693 | Azevedo et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512754 | Needham | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8518376 | Schuz et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8536159 | Zeng et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8540967 | Trivedi et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8541400 | Joabsson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8551462 | Marenus et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8551508 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8557281 | Tuominen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8568374 | de Graaff et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8591951 | Kohn et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8613951 | Troiano et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8633178 | Cacace et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8633180 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636787 | Sabaria | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8636982 | Schuz et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8653129 | Fein et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8658627 | Voskuhl | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8658628 | Baucom | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8663681 | Ahmed et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8663692 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8663703 | Moldayski et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8664207 | Zheng et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8669293 | Sharoni et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8679552 | Guthery | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8694358 | Tryfon | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8697127 | Sah | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8697710 | Zeng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8703105 | Besonov et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8709385 | Schuz et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8709451 | Rapoport et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8715735 | Funke et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8721331 | Raghuprasad | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8722021 | Eini et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734846 | Hrkach et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8735381 | Podolski | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8741336 | Dipierro et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8741373 | Rao et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8753661 | Gassner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8784882 | Mattern | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8846648 | Bernick et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8846649 | Bernick et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8933059 | Bernick et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8987237 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8987238 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8993548 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8993549 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9006222 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9012434 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9114145 | Bernick et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9114146 | Bernick et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9180091 | Bernick et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9248136 | Bernick et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9289382 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9301920 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9931349 | Shadiack et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 10258630 | Mirkin | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 20010005728 | Guittard et al. | Feb 2001 | A1 |
| 20010009673 | Gunther et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021816 | Caillouette | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010023261 | Ryoo et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027189 | Bennink et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029357 | Bunt et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010031747 | de Ziegler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032125 | Bhan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034340 | Pickar | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20120269878 | Cantor et al. | Oct 2001 | A2 |
| 20010053383 | Sablotsky et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056068 | Chwalisz et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020012710 | Lansky | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026158 | Rathbone et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028788 | Bunt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035070 | Gardlik et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058648 | Hammerly | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058926 | Rathbone et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020064541 | Lapidot et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020076441 | Shih et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102308 | Wei et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107230 | Waldon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020114803 | Deaver et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119174 | Gardlik et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119198 | Gao et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132801 | Heil et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137749 | Levinson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142017 | Simonnet | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151530 | Leonard et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156394 | Mehrotra et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169150 | Pickar | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169205 | Garfield et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020173510 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193356 | Van Beek et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193758 | Sandberg | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197286 | Brandman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030003139 | Gunther et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004145 | Leonard | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030007994 | Bunt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030027772 | Breton | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091620 | Venkateshwaran et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030044453 | Volkel et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030049307 | Gyurik | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064097 | Patel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064975 | Koch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072760 | Sirbasku | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073248 | Roth et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073673 | Hesch | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077297 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078245 | Bennink et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091640 | Ramanathan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092691 | Besse et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030096012 | Besse et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104048 | Patel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030109507 | Beckmann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113268 | Buenafae et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114420 | Salvati et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114430 | MacLeod et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124182 | Shojaei et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030124191 | Besse et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130558 | Massara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030144258 | Heil et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030157157 | Luo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166509 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170295 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175329 | Mak et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030175333 | Shefer et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030180352 | Patel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181353 | Nyce | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181728 | Salvati et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191096 | Leonard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195177 | Leonard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215496 | Patel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030219402 | Rutter | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220297 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224057 | Martin-Letellier et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030224059 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225047 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225048 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030225050 | Eichardt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228686 | Klausner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229057 | Caubel et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030235596 | Gao et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236236 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009960 | Heil et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022820 | Anderson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034001 | Karara | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037881 | Guittard et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039356 | Maki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043043 | Schlyter et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043943 | Guittard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044080 | Place et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040048900 | Flood | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052824 | Abou Chacra-Vernet et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073024 | Metcalf, III et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077605 | Salvati et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040077606 | Salvati et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087548 | Salvati et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087564 | Wright et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040089308 | Welch | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092494 | Dudley | May 2004 | A9 |
| 20040092583 | Shanahan-Prendergast | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093261 | Jain et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097468 | Wimalawansa | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101557 | Gibson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106542 | Deaver et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040110732 | Masini et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131670 | Gao | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138103 | Patt | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142012 | Bunt et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146539 | Gupta | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040146894 | Warrington et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147578 | Calvet | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040161435 | Gupta | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176324 | Salvati et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176336 | Rodriguez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040185104 | Piao et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191207 | Lipari et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191276 | Muni | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198706 | Carrara et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210280 | Liedtke | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213744 | Lulla et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219124 | Gupta | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225140 | Sciano et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234606 | Levine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040241219 | Hille et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243437 | Grace et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040253319 | Netke et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259817 | Waldon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266745 | Schwanitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003003 | Deaver et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004088 | Hesch | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009800 | Thumbeck et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050014729 | Pulaski | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020550 | Latif et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020552 | Aschkenasay et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021009 | Massara et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050025833 | Aschkenasay et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050031651 | Gervais et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042173 | Besse et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050042268 | Aschkenasay et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050048116 | Straub et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050054991 | Paterson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050079138 | Chickering, III et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085453 | Govindarajan | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101579 | Shippen | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113350 | Duesterberg et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118244 | Theobild et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118272 | Besse et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050129756 | Podhaisky et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050152956 | Dudley | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050153946 | Hirsh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050164977 | Coelingh Bennink | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182105 | Nirschl et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186141 | Gonda et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187267 | Hamann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192253 | Salvati et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192310 | Gavai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050196434 | Brierre | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207990 | Funke et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209209 | Koch et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050214384 | Juturu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220825 | Funke et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220900 | Wuttke et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222106 | Bracht | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228692 | Hodgdon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228718 | Austin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239747 | Le et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239758 | Roby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244360 | Billoni | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244522 | Carrara et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245902 | Cornish et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250746 | Iammatteo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250750 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050250753 | Fink et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256028 | Yun et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266078 | Jorda et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266088 | Frijlink et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271597 | Keith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050271598 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272685 | Hung | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050272712 | Grubb et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060009428 | Grubb et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014728 | Chwalisz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060018937 | Friedman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019978 | Balog | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020002 | Salvati et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060030615 | Fensome et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034889 | Jo et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034904 | Weimann | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040904 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051391 | Dvoskin et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052341 | Cornish et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069031 | Loumaye | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078618 | Constantinides et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083778 | Allison et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084704 | Shih et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088580 | Seibertz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089337 | Casper et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060093678 | Chickering, III et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100180 | Bohlmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106004 | Brody et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110415 | Gupta | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111424 | Salvati et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121102 | Chiang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060121626 | Imrich | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060134188 | Podhaisky et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135619 | Kick et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165744 | Anyarambhatla et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193789 | Tamarkin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060194775 | Tofovic et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060204557 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233743 | Kelly | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060233841 | Pushpala et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060235037 | Purandare et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240111 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060246122 | Langguth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247216 | Haj-Yehia | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247221 | Coelingh et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251581 | Madenjian et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060252049 | Shuler et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060257472 | Neilsen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060275218 | Besonov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060275360 | Ahmed et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276414 | Coelingh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060280771 | Groenewegen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060280797 | Shoichet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060280800 | Nagi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292223 | McIlroy et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070004693 | Woolfson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070004694 | Woolfson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009559 | Alosio et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009594 | Grubb et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070010550 | Mckenzie | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070014839 | Bracht | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070015698 | Goldstein et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021360 | Nyce et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027201 | McComas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031491 | Levine et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070037780 | Anigbogu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070037782 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070042038 | Besse | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070060589 | Purandare et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066628 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066637 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070066675 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071777 | Bromer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078091 | Hubler et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070088029 | Balog et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093548 | Diffendal et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116729 | Palepu | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070116829 | Prakash et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070128263 | Wall et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154533 | Dudley | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167418 | Ferguson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070178166 | Bernstein et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184558 | Roth et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185068 | Ferguson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190022 | Chiao et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191319 | Ke et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196415 | Houston et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196433 | Ron et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207225 | Squadrito | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225281 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070232574 | Bernard et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238713 | Gast et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243229 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070248658 | Bracht et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070254858 | Cronk | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255197 | Wilkins et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264309 | Chollet et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264345 | Eros et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070264349 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070270394 | El-Alfy et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070286819 | DeVries et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070287688 | Chan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070287789 | Jones et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292359 | Schuz et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292387 | Jon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292461 | Danziger et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070292493 | Brierre | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298089 | Yoshinaga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080026035 | Chollet et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026040 | Rivera et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026062 | Farr et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038219 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080038350 | Gerecke et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039405 | Joseph et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050317 | Besonov et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051351 | Ghisalberti | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063607 | Berman et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069779 | Schuz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080069791 | Beissert | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080085877 | Bortz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095831 | McGraw | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095838 | Abou Chacra-Vernet | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113953 | DeVries et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080119537 | Zhang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080125402 | Dilberti | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138379 | Jennings-Spring | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080138390 | Gricenko et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080139392 | Yuan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080145423 | Khan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080153789 | Dmowski et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175814 | Phiasivongsa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175905 | Biksh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080175908 | Biksh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080188829 | Creasy | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206156 | Cronk | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206159 | Schuz et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206161 | Tamarkin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214512 | Seitz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220069 | Allison | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226698 | Beste et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227763 | Paris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234199 | Katamreddy | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234240 | Duesterberg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255078 | Katamreddy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255089 | Katamreddy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261931 | Stenlof et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114050 | Fensome et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080299220 | Tamarkin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306036 | Katamreddy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312197 | Rodriguez | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312198 | Rodriguez | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319078 | Katamreddy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090004246 | Woolfson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090010968 | Peyrot et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011041 | Musaeva et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090017120 | Brisco et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022683 | Park et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090047357 | Tomohira et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053294 | Prendergast | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060982 | Ron et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090060997 | Seitz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068118 | Eini et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074859 | Patel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081206 | Leibovitz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081278 | De Graaff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081303 | Savoir et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090092656 | Klamerus et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093440 | Murad | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098069 | Vacca | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099106 | Phiasivongsa et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099149 | Kresevic | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090130029 | Tamarkin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090131385 | Voskuhl | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137478 | Bernstein et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137538 | Klamerus et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143344 | Chang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090164341 | Sunvold et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175799 | Tamarkin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090181088 | Song et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186081 | Slot et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197843 | Notelovitz et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090203658 | Rose et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214474 | Jennings | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227025 | Nichols et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090227550 | Mattern | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090232897 | Sahoo et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090258096 | Cohen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264395 | Creasy | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090269403 | Shaked et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285772 | Phiasivongsa et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090285869 | Trimble | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318558 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324714 | Kresevic et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090325916 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100008985 | Vermeulen et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100028360 | Atwood | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100034838 | Staniforth et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100034880 | Sintov | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100040671 | Ahmed et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048523 | Bachman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100055138 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100074959 | Hansom et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100086501 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100086599 | Huempel et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092568 | Lerner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105071 | Laufer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100119585 | Hille et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100129320 | Phiasivongsa et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136105 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137265 | Leonard | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100137271 | Chen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143420 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100143481 | Shenoy et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100150993 | Theobald et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152144 | Hermsmeyer | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168228 | Bose et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183723 | Laurent-Applegate et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184736 | Coelingh Bennink et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100190758 | Fauser et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100204326 | D Souza | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210994 | Zarif | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100221195 | Ziv et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227797 | Danielsson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100240626 | Kulkarni et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247482 | Chen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247632 | Dong et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100247635 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100255085 | Liu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100273730 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100278759 | Murad | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100279988 | Setiawan et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100291191 | Lapitsky et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292199 | Leverd et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303825 | Sirbasku | Dec 2010 | A9 |
| 20100312137 | Gilmour et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316724 | Whitfield et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100322884 | Wilkins et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100330168 | Gicquel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110028439 | Witt-Enderby et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110039814 | Ross et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110053845 | Levine et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066473 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076775 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110076776 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110086825 | Chatroux | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087192 | Uhland et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110091555 | De Luigi Bruschi et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098258 | Canet et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098631 | McIntyre et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104268 | Segot et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110104289 | Savoir Vilboeuf et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130372 | Marliani et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135719 | Besins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110142945 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152840 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158920 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110171140 | Illum et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110182997 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190201 | Wood, Jr. et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195031 | Du | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195114 | Carrara et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195944 | Mura et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217341 | Sah | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110238003 | Karabelas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110244043 | Wang et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250256 | Hyun et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250259 | Buckman | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250274 | Shaked et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110256092 | Phiasivongsa et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262373 | Umbert | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262494 | Achleitner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110268665 | Tamarkin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110275584 | Volkmann et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110281832 | Wennogle et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110287094 | Penhasi et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293720 | General et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294738 | Kuliopulos et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110300167 | Covic et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301087 | Mcbride et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110306579 | Stein | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110311592 | Birbara | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110312927 | Nachaegari et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110312928 | Nachaegari et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110318405 | Erwin | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110318431 | Gulati | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120009276 | De Groote | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120015350 | Nabatiyan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120021041 | Rossi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028888 | Janz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028910 | Takruri et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120028936 | Popova et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120045532 | Cohen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120046264 | Lieb et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120046518 | Yoakum et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120052077 | Truitt, III et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120058171 | Zeeman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120058962 | Sparrow et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120058979 | Auspitz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120064135 | Harms et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065179 | Andersson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120065221 | Babul | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120087872 | Schuz et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101073 | Mannion | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120121517 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120121692 | Fang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122829 | Masini et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128625 | Shalwitz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128654 | Terpstra et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128683 | Shantha | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128733 | Perrin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120128777 | Keck et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129773 | Geier et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129819 | Vancaillie et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136013 | Wennogle et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120142645 | Marx | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120148670 | Lee et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149748 | Shanler et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120172343 | Schuermann et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120184515 | Schwede et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120231052 | Brinton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232011 | Kneissel et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120232042 | Krenz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120263679 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120269721 | Weng et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277249 | Tarrand et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277727 | Doshi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120283671 | Shibata et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120295911 | Mannion et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120301517 | Warner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120301538 | Latere et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302535 | Caufriez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316130 | Hendrix | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120316496 | Horres et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321579 | Edelson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120322779 | Voskuhl | Dec 2012 | A9 |
| 20120328549 | Edelson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120329738 | Liu | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130004619 | Goh et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130011342 | Hazot et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130017239 | Fernandez et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130022674 | Dudley et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130023505 | Garfield et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130023823 | Volland et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130028850 | Hazot et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130029947 | Nachaegari et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130029957 | Venkateshwaran et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130045266 | Kang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130045953 | Grenier et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130059795 | Lo et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130064897 | Binay | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130072466 | Choi et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130084257 | Ishida et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130085123 | Zhao et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130089574 | Stock et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130090318 | Gainer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130102781 | Ely et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130108551 | Gruell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116215 | Lleo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116222 | Altomari et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130122051 | Gullapalli et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123175 | Mckee et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123220 | Queiroz | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123351 | Dewitt | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130129818 | Bernick et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131027 | Schmitz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131028 | Snyder et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130131029 | Baltussen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130149314 | Bullerdiek et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130164225 | Besonov et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130164346 | Son et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165744 | Carson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178452 | King | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130183254 | Cochran et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130183325 | Sforzini et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189193 | Besonov et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189196 | Tamarkin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189230 | Kooy et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130189368 | Mosqueira et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130210709 | Covic et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216550 | Penninger et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216596 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224177 | Kim et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224257 | Sah et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224268 | Jaikaria et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130224300 | Maggio | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225412 | Sardari et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130225542 | Frick et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130226113 | Langguth et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130243696 | Wang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245253 | Mook et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245570 | Jackson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130261096 | Merian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130266645 | Schoenecker et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267485 | Da Silva | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130273167 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130274211 | Prusthy et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130280213 | Voskuhl | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130316374 | Menon et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317065 | Seto et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317315 | Tsang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130324565 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331363 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338122 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338123 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338124 | Zhao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130345187 | Rodriguez | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140018335 | Seto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140024590 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140031289 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140031323 | Perez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066416 | Leunis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140072531 | Oh et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140079686 | Prouty et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088051 | Bernick et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088058 | Maurizio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140088059 | Santha et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094426 | Drummond et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094440 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094441 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140099362 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100159 | Conrad | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100204 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100205 | Bernick et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100206 | Cacace et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140113889 | Haine et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127185 | Sayeed et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127280 | Jukarainen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140127308 | Opara et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140128798 | Malanchin et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148491 | Valia et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140186332 | Ezrin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140187487 | Shoichet et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140193523 | Henry | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194396 | Wennogle et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140206616 | Ko et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140213565 | Bernick et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140329783 | Bernick et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140370084 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371182 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371183 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371184 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140371185 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150031654 | Amadio | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045335 | Bernick et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133421 | Bernick et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164789 | Bernick et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150224117 | Bernick et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150224118 | Bernick et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302435 | Bernick et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342963 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150352126 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150359737 | Bernick et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160030449 | Persicaner et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160213685 | Bernick et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170056418 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281645 | Shadiack et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281646 | Inskeep et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281647 | Shadiack et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281776 | Shadiack et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| PI1001367-9 | Jul 2012 | BR |
| 2612380 | Dec 2006 | CA |
| 102258455 | Nov 2011 | CN |
| 0275716 | Jul 1988 | EP |
| 0279977 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0622075 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0785211 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 0785212 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 0811381 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0904064 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 1300152 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1094781 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2191833 | Jun 2010 | EP |
| 452238 | Aug 1936 | GB |
| 720561 | Dec 1954 | GB |
| 848881 | Sep 1960 | GB |
| 874368 | Aug 1961 | GB |
| 1589946 | May 1981 | GB |
| 2005KOL00053 | Aug 2005 | IN |
| 216026 | Mar 2008 | IN |
| 244217 | Nov 2010 | IN |
| H4-503810 | Sep 1990 | JP |
| H2-264725 | Oct 1990 | JP |
| 199010425 | Sep 1990 | WO |
| 1990011064 | Oct 1990 | WO |
| 1993017686 | Sep 1993 | WO |
| 1994022426 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| 1995030409 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| 1996009826 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| 1996019975 | Jul 1996 | WO |
| 1996030000 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 1997005491 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 1997043989 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 1998010293 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 1998032465 | Jul 1998 | WO |
| 1998051280 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| 1999022680 | May 1999 | WO |
| 1999032072 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 1999039700 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 1999042109 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| 1999043304 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 1999048477 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 1999053910 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| 1999062497 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 1999063974 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 2000001351 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| 2000006175 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| 2000038659 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 2000045795 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 2000050007 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 2000059577 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| 2000076522 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 2001037808 | May 2001 | WO |
| 2001054699 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001060325 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| 2001087276 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| 2001091757 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| 2002007700 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| 2002011768 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 2002022132 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| 2002040008 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2002041878 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2002053131 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| 2002078602 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2002078604 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| 2003028667 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| 2003041718 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003041741 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2003068186 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 2003077923 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2003082254 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2003092588 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2004014397 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2004014432 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| 2004017983 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| 2004032897 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| 2004052336 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 2004054540 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| 2004080413 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| 2004110408 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| 2005027911 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005030175 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005081825 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005087194 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005087199 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005105059 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2005115335 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2005120470 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2005120517 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2006013369 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006034090 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2006036899 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| 2006053172 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006105615 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006113505 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| 2006138686 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2006138735 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| 2007045027 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2007076144 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007103294 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2007120868 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2007123790 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2007124250 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| 2007144151 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| 2008049516 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008152444 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009002542 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009036311 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| 2009040818 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009069006 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| 2009098072 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| 2009133352 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2010033188 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010146872 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011000210 | Jan 2011 | WO |
| 2011073995 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| 2011120084 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2011128336 | Oct 2011 | WO |
| 2012009778 | Jan 2012 | WO |
| 2012024361 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012055814 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012055840 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012065740 | May 2012 | WO |
| 2012098090 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2012116277 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012118563 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012120365 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012127501 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012156561 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012156822 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012158483 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012166909 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012170578 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013011501 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| 2013025449 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013028639 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| 2013035101 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013044067 | Mar 2013 | WO |
| 2013045404 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013059285 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013063279 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013064620 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013071281 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013078422 | May 2013 | WO |
| 2013088254 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| 2013102665 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013106437 | Jul 2013 | WO |
| 2013112947 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013113690 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013124415 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013127727 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013127728 | Sep 2013 | WO |
| 2013144356 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013149258 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013158454 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013170052 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013178587 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013181449 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013192248 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013192249 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013192250 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2013192251 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2014001904 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014004424 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014009434 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014018569 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014018570 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014018571 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014018856 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014018932 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| 2014031958 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| 2014041120 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| 2014052792 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014056897 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| 2014066442 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014074846 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014076231 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014076569 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014081598 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014086739 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014093114 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014104784 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2015179782 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2016018993 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 6,214,374 B1, 04/2001, Schmirler et al. (withdrawn) |
| MacBride et al, “Vulvovaginal atrophy,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 87-94 (Year: 2010). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002, filed Nov. 21, 2012, U.S. Pat. No. 8,633,178, Jan. 21, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,362, filed Mar. 15, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428, filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,301,920, Apr. 5, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,648, Sep. 30, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,987,237, Mar. 24, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,649, Sep. 30, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/099,582, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,012,434, Apr. 21, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,987,238, Mar. 24, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 8,933,059, Jan. 13, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623, filed Dec. 6, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,006,222, Apr. 14, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655, filed Dec. 13, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554, filed Jan. 25, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,248,136, Feb. 2, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048, filed Dec. 20, 2013, U.S. Pat. No. 9,180,091, Nov. 10, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,548, Mar. 31, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 8,993,549, Mar. 31, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,946, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,114,145, Aug. 25, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/476,040, filed Sep. 3, 2014, U.S. Pat. No. 9,114,146, Aug. 25, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/512,046, filed Oct. 10, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,002, filed Oct. 22, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230, filed Oct. 22, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,051, filed Feb. 17, 2015, U.S. Pat. No. 9,289,382, Mar. 22, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/649,818, filed Jun. 18, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/690,913, filed Apr. 20, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/690,955, filed Apr. 20, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/719,933, filed May 22, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/812,179, filed Jul. 29, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/830,398, filed Aug. 19, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,493, filed Apr. 4, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/420,019, filed Jan. 30, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/475,052, filed Mar. 30, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/475,068, filed Mar. 30, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/832,750, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/832,757, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/893,542, filed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/893,546, filed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/893,550, filed Feb. 9, 2018. |
| Abbas et al., Regression of endometrial implants treated with vitamin D3 in a rat model of endometriosis, European J of Pharma, 715 (2013) 72-75, Elsevier. |
| Abitec, CapmulMCM, EP, Technical Data Sheet, version 10, 2014, Columbus, OH. |
| Abitec, CapmulMCM, NF, Technical Data Sheet, version 6, 2014, Columbus, OH. |
| Abitec, CapmulMCM, Saftey Data Sheet, 2011, Janesville, WI. |
| Abitec, CapmulMCM, Technical Data Sheet, version 17, 2014, Columbus, OH. |
| Abitec, CapmulPG8, CAS No. 31565-12-5, version 11, 2006, Columbus, OH. |
| Abitec, Excipients for the Pharmaceutical Industry—Regulatory and Product Information, 2013, 2 pages. |
| Acarturk, Fusun, Mucoadhesive Vaginal Drug Delivery System, Recent Patents on Drug Delivery & Formulation, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 193-195. |
| Alabi, K. A., et al., Analysis of Fatty Acid Composition of Thevetia peruviana and Hura crepitans Seed oils using GC-FID, Fountain Journal of Nat. and Appl. Sciences, vol. 2(2), pp. 32-37, 2013, Osogbo. |
| Alexander, KS, Corn Oil, CAS No. 8001-30-7, Jan. 2009. |
| Alvarez et al., Ectopic uterine tissue as a chronic pain generator, Neuroscience, Dec. 6, 2012 225: 269-272. |
| Application Note FT-IR: JI-Ap-FT0508-008, CD spectra of pharmaceuticals substances—Steroids (2), JASCO International Co., Ltd., 2 pages. |
| Araya-Sibaja et al., Crystallization of progesterone polymorphs using polymer-induced heteronucleation (PIHn) method, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Early Online, pp. 1-8, 2014, Informa Healthcare. |
| Araya-Sibaja, Andrea M.A., Morphology Study of Progesterone Polymorphs Prepared by Polymer-Induced Heteronucleation (PIHn), Scanning vol. 35 pp. 213-221, 2013, Wiley Period., Inc. |
| Araya-Sibaja, Andrea Manela, et al., Chemical Properties of Progesterone Selected Refer., SciFinder, 2014, American Chemical Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Araya-Sibaja, Andrea Manela, et al., Polymorphism in Progesterone Selected References, SciFinder, Feb. 24, 2014, pp. 1-12, American Chem. Society & Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Araya-Sibaja, Andrea Manela, et al., Polymorphism in Progesterone, SciFinder, pp. 1-46, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Archer et al., Effects of ospemifene on the female reproductive and urinary tracts: translation from preclinical models into clinical evidence, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, vol. 22, No. 77, pp. 1-11 (2015). |
| Archer et al., Estrace® vs Premarin® for Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms: Dosage Comparison Study, Advances in Therapy®, vol. 9 No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1992. |
| Ashburn et al., Cardiovascular, Hepatic and Renal Lesions in Mice Receiving Cortisone, Estrone and Progesterone, Yale J Bilogy and Medicine, vol. 35, Feb. 1963, pp. 329-340. |
| Azeem, Adnan et al., Microemulsions as a Surrogate Carrier for Dermal Drug Delivery, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, May 2000, vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 525-547 (abstract only). http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03639040802448646. |
| Azure Pharma, Inc., Elestrin™—Estradiol Gel, Drug Info, http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/archives/fdaDrugInfo.cfm?archiveid=11885, 26 pages, Aug. 2009. |
| Bakhmutova-Albert, Ekaterina, et al., Enhancing Aqueous Dissolution Rates of Progesterone via Cocrystallization, SSCI, Division of Aptuit, Poster No. R6247, West Lafayette. |
| Banerjee, Sila, et al., On the Stability of Salivary Progesterone Under Various Conditions of Storage, Steroids, vol. 46(6), pp. 967-974, Dec. 1985. |
| Barnett, Steven M, Pressure-tuning infared and solution Raman spectroscopic studies of 17B-estradiol and several A-ring . . . , Vibrational Spectroscopy 8, Elsevier, pp. 263, 1995. |
| Bartosova, Transdermal Drug Delivery in Vitro Using Diffusion Cells, Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2012, 19, 4671-4677, Bentham Science Publishers. |
| Benbow et al., Distribution and Metabolism of Maternal Progesterone in the Uterus, Placenta, and Fetus during Rat Pregnancy, Biology of Reproduction 52, 1327-1333 (1995). |
| Bernabei, M.T., et al., Release of progesterone polymorphs from dimethylpolysiloxane polymeric matrixes, Bollettino Chimico Farmaceutico, vol. 122(1) pp. 20-26, 1983 SciFinder. |
| Bhavnani Bhagu R. et al., “Misconception and Concerns about Bioidentical Hormones Used for Custom-Compounded Hormone Therapy,” J Clin Endocrinol Metab, Mar. 2012, 97(3):756-759. |
| Bhavnani et al., Structure Activity Relationships and Differential Interactions and Functional Activity of Various Equine Estrogens Mediated via Estrogen Receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ, Endocrinology, Oct. 2008, 149(10):4857-4870. |
| Bhavnani, B.R., Stanczyk, F.Z., Pharmacology of conjugated equine estrogens: Efficacy, safety and mechanism of action, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Bhavnani, B.R., Stanczyk, F.Z., Use of medroxyprogesterone acetate for hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: Is it safe? J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| BioMed Central, Solubility of Progesterone in Organic Solvents, Online PDF, http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1475-2859-11-106-S2.pdf. |
| Blake et al., Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductiveaged female subjects, Fertility and Sterility# vol. 94, No. 4, Sep. 2010, Elsevier. |
| Borka, Laszlo, Crystal Polymorphism of Pharmaceuticals, Acta Pharm. Jugosl., vol. 40 pp. 71-94, 1990. |
| Brinton, L.A., Felix, A.S., Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of endometrial cancer, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| British Pharmacocopoeia 2014 Online, Refined Maize Oil, Ph. Eur. Monograph 1342, vol. I & II, Monographs: Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Substances, http://www.pharmacopoeia.co.uk/bp2014/ixbin/bp.cgi?a=print&id=7400&tab=a-z%20index [Feb. 3, 2014 1:37:50 PM]. |
| Burry, Kenneth A, Percutaneous absorption of progesterone in postmenopausal women treated with transdermal estrogen, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 180(6) part 1, pp. 1504-1511, 1999. |
| Busetta, Par Bernard, Structure Cristalline et Moleculair de l'Oestradiol Hemihydrate, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 560, 1972, Bis(dimethyl-o-thiolophenylarsine)palladium(II). |
| Busetta, Par Bernard, Structure Cristalline et Moleculaire du Complexe Oestradiol-Propanol, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 1349, 1972, J.A. Kanters and J. Kroon. |
| Campsteyn, Par H, et al., Structure Cristalline et Molcculaire de la Progesterone C21H30O2, Acta Cryst., B28 pp. 3032-3042, 1972. |
| Castelo-Branco Camil et al., “Treatment of atrophic vaaginitis,” Therapy, 2007, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 349-353. |
| Cendejas-Santana, G, et al., Growth and characterization of progesterone crystallites, Revista Mexicana de Fisica, 50, Suplemento 1 pp. 1-3, 2004. |
| Chambin et al., Interest of Multifunctional Lipid Excipients: Case of Gelucire® 44/14, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 527-534 (Year: 2005). |
| ChemPro, Top-Notch Technology in Production of Oils and Fats, Chempro-Edible-Oil-Refining-ISO-TUV-Austria. |
| Cho, Y.A. et al., Transdermal Delivery of Ketorolac Tromethamine: Effects of Vehicles and Penetration Enhancers, Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 30(6):557-564, Jun. 2004. |
| Christen et al., Phase I/Pharmacokinetic Study of High-Dose Progesterone and Doxorubicin, J Clin Oncol 11:2417-2426, 1993. |
| Christensson et al., Limonene hydroperoxide analogues differ in allergenic activity, Contact Dermatitis 2008: 59: 344-352. |
| Christensson et al., Limonene hydroperoxide analogues show specific patch test reactions, Contact Dermatitis, 70, 291-299, 2014. |
| Christensson et al., Positive patch test reactions to oxidized limonene: exposure and relevance , Contact Dermatitis, 71, 264-272, 2014. |
| Chun et al., Transdermal Delivery of Estradiol and Norethrindrone Acetate: Effect of Vehicles . . . , J. Kor. Pharm. Sci., vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 173-177 (2005). |
| Cicinelli et al., Direct Transport of Progesterone From Vagina to Uterus, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95, No. 3, Mar. 2000, pp. 403-406. |
| Cicinelli et al., “First uterine pass effect” is observed when estradiol is placed in the upper but not lower third of the vagina, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 1414-1416. |
| Cicinelli, Intravaginal oestrogen and progestin administration: advantages and disadvantages, Best Practices & Research Clinical Obstretrics and Gynaecology vol. 22, No. 2, 2008, pp. 391-405. |
| Cole, Wayne & Julian, Percy L, Sterols. I. A Study of the 22-Ketosteroids, Cont. of the Research Lab. of the Glidden Co., Soya Prod. Div., vol. 67 pp. 1369-1375, Aug. 1945, Chicago. |
| Committee Opinion, Incidentally Detected Short Cervical Length, Committee of Obstetric Practice, Obstetrics & Gynecology, ACOG, vol. 119, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 879-882. |
| Commodari, Fernando, Comparison of 17β-estradiol structures from x-ray diffraction and solution NMR, Magn. Reson. Chem., vol. 43, pp. 444-450, 2005, Wiley InterScience. |
| Cooper, A, et al., Systemic absorption of progesterone from Progest cream in postmenopausal women, The Lancet, vol. 351, pp. 1255-1256, Research Letters, Apr. 25, 1998. |
| Corbett et al., “Trends in Pharmacy Compounding for Women's Health in North Carolina: Focus on Vulvodynia,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 107, No. 7, Jul. 2014, pp. 433-436. |
| Corn Refiners Association, Corn Oil, 5th Edition, Washington, D.C., 2006. |
| Crandall, Carolyn, “Vaginal Estrogen Preparations: A Review of Safety and Efficacy for Vaginal Atrophy,” Journal of Women's Health, 2002, vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 857-877. |
| Cremer Care, ““MIGLYOL® 810, 812 INCI: Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride,”” Cremer Oleo GmbH & Co. KG, pp. 1-7, available at http://s3.amazonaws.com/petercremerna/products/spec_sheets/159/339/301 /originai/MIGL YOL_81 0_812_ TDS.pdf?1389204445 (Mar. 2013) accessed on Dec. 30, 2016. |
| Critchley et al., Estrogen Receptor β, But Not Estrogen Receptor α, Is Present in the Vascular Endothelium of the Human and Nonhuman Primate Endometrium, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 1370-1378. |
| Dauqan, Eqbal M. A., et al., Fatty Acids Composition of Four Different Vegetable Oils (Red Palm Olein, Palm Olein, Corn Oil, IPCBEE, vol. 14, 2011, IACSIT Press, Singapore. |
| Dideberg, O, et al., Crystal data on progesterone (C21H30O2), desoxycorticosterone (C21H30O3), corticosterone (C21H30O4) and aldosterone . . . , J. Appl. Cryst. vol. 4 pp. 80, 1971. |
| Diramio, Jackie A., Polyethylene Glycol Methacrylate/Dimetacrylate Hydrogels for Controlled Release of Hydrophobic Drugs, Masters of Science Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 2002, 131 pages. |
| Drakulic, Branko J, Role of complexes formation between drugs and penetration enhancers in transdermal . . . , Inter. Journal of Pharmaceutics, Elsevier, vol. 363, pp. 40-49, 2009. |
| Du et al., Percutaneous progesterone delivery via cream or gel application in postmenopausal women: a randomized cross-over study of progesterone levels in serum, whole blood, saliva, and capillary blood, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, 2013, vol. 20, No. 11, pp. 1-7. |
| Duax, William L, et al., Conformation of Progesterone Side Chain: Conflict between X-ray Data and Force-Field Calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 103 pp. 6705-6712, Jun. 1981. |
| Duclos, R, et al., Polymorphism of Progesterone: Influence of the carrier and of the solid dispersion manufacturing . . . , J. Thermal Anal., vol. 37 pp. 1869-1875, 1991, Wiley. |
| Ebian, A.R., Ebian Article: Polymorphism and solvation of ethinyl estradiol, SciFinder, Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, vol. 54(4), pp. 111-114, 1979, Alexandria, Egypt. |
| Eisenberger, A., Westhoff, C., Hormone replacement therapy and venous thromboembolism, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Engelhardt et al., Conceptus Influences the Distribution of Uterine Leukocytes During Early Porcine Pregnancy, Biology of Reproduction 66, 1875-1880 (2002). |
| Estradiol, The Merck Index Online, Royal Society of Chemistry, https://www.rsc.org/Merck-Index/monograph/mono1500003758/estradiol?q=unauthorize. |
| Ettinger et al., Comparison of endometrial growth produced by unopposed conjugated estrogens or by micronized estradiol in postmenopausal women, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:112-117. |
| Excipients for Pharmaceuticals, Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GMBH, 2010, 28 pages. |
| Faassen, Fried, Physicochemical Properties and Transport of Steroids across Caco-2 Cells, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 20(2), 2003, Plenum Pub. Corp. |
| FDA, Draft Guidance on Progesterone, Recommended Apr. 2010, Revised Feb. 2011 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM209294.pdf. |
| Ferrari, Roseli AP., et al., Oxidative Stability of Biodiesel From Soybean Oil Fatty Acid Ethyl Esters, Sci. Agric., vol. 62(3), pp. 291-295, 2005, PiracicaB1, Braz. |
| Filipsson et al., Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 5: Limonene, first draft, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1998, 36 pages. |
| Final Report on the Safety Assessment of BHT, International Journal of Toxicology, 21(Suppl. 2):19-94, 2002/. |
| Flyvholm, Sensitizing risk of butylated hydroxytoluene B1sed on exposure and effect data, Contact Dermatitis 1990: 23: 341-345. |
| Fotherby, K., Bioavailability of Orally Administered Sex Steroids Used in Oral Contraception and Hormone Replacement Therapy, Contraception, 1996; 54:59-69. |
| Franklin et al., Characterization of immunoglobulins and cytokines in human cervical mucus: influence of exogenous and endogenous hormones, Journal of Reproductive Immunology 42 (1999) 93-106, Elsevier. |
| Franz et al., Use of Excised Human Skin to Assess the Bioequivalence of Topical Products, Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:276-286. |
| Freedman, R.R., Menopausal hot flashes: Mechanisms, endocrinology, treatment, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.(2013), Elsevier. |
| Fuchs et al., The Effects of an Estrogen and Glycolic Acid Cream on the Facial Skin of Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Histologic Study, Cutis. Jun. 2003;71(6):481-8. |
| Fugh-Berman, Adriane, Bioidentical Hormones for Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Variation on a Theme, Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 22, pp. 1030-1034, 2007. |
| Furness et al., Hormone therapy in postmenopausal women and risk of endometrial hyperplasia (Review), 2012, pp. 1-204, The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| Gäfvert et al., Free radicals in antigen formation: reduction of contact allergic response to hydroperoxides by epidermal treatment with antioxidants, British Journal of Dermatology 2002; 146: 649-656. |
| Ganam-Quintanar et al., Evaluation of the transepidermal permeation of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether and skin water loss, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vo. 147, No. 2, Feb. 28, 1997, pp. 165-171 (abstract only). |
| Garad S. et al., “Preclinical Development for Suspensions,” A.K. Kulshreshtha et al. (eds.), Pharmaceutical Suspensions: From Formulation Development to Manufacturing, Springer, New York 2010, pp. 127-176. |
| Gattefossé SAS, Material Safety Data Sheet, Gelot 64, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Gattefossé SAS, Regulatory Data Sheet, Gelot 64, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Gattefossé SAS, Regulatory Data Sheet, Lauroglycol 90, 2012, 5 pages. |
| Gattefossé, “Excipients for Safe and Effective Topical Delivery, Drug Development and Delivery” Jul./Aug. 2012, http://drug-dev.com/Main/B1ck-Issues/Transdermal-Topical-Subcutaneous-NonInvasive-Deliv-5.aspx#. |
| Geelen, Math J.H. et al., “Dietary medium-chain fatty acids raise and (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids lower hepatic triacylglycerol synthesis in rats,” The Journal of Nutrition, 1995, 125(10):2449-2456. |
| Gillet et al., Induction of amenorrhea during hormone replacement therapy: optimal micronized progesterone dose. A multicenter study, Maturitas 19 (1994) 103-115. |
| Giron-Forest, D, et al., Thermal analyis methods for pharmacopoeial materials, J. Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Anal., vol. 7(12) pp. 1421-1433, 1989, Pergamon Press, Gr. Britain. |
| Giron-Forest, D, Thermal analysis and calorimetric methods in the characterisation of polymorphs and solvates, Thermochimica Acta, vol. 248 pp. 1-59, 1995, Elsevier. |
| Glaser et al, Pilot Study: Absorption and Efficacy of Multiple Hormones Delivered in a Single Cream Applied to the Mucous Membranes of the Labia and Vagina, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;66:111-118. |
| Golatowski et al., Comparative evaluation of saliva collection methods for proteome analysis, Clinica Chimica Acta 419 (2013) 42-46. |
| Graham et al, Physiological Action of Progesterone in Target Tissues, Endocrine Reviews, 1997, vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 502-519. |
| Groothuis et al., Estrogen and the endometrium: lessons learned from gene expression profiling in rodents and human, Human Reproduction Update, vol. 13, No. 4 pp. 405-417, 2007. |
| Gunstone, Frank D, et al., Vegetable Oils in Food Technology: Composition, Properties and Uses, Blackwell Publishing, CRC Press, 2002. |
| Gurney, E.P. et al., The Women's Health Initiative trial and related studies: 10 years later: A clinician's view, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Hamid et al., The effects of common solubilizing agents on the intestinal membrane B1rrier functions and membrane toxicity in rats, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 379 (2009) 100-108, Elsevier. |
| Haner, Barbara, Crystal data (I) for some pregnenes and pregnadienes, Acta Cryst., vol. 17 pp. 1610, 1964. |
| Hapgood, J.P., et al., Potency of progestogens used in hormonal therapy: Toward understanding differential actions, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Hargrove et al., Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy with Continuous Daily Oral Micronize Estradiol and Progesterone, Obstet Gynecol, vol. 73, No. 4, Apr. 1989, pp. 606-612. |
| Hatton et al., “Safety and efficacy of a lipid emulsion containing medium-chain triglycerides,” Clinical Pharmacy, 1990, vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 366-371. |
| He et al., Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Uteri of Rats with Endometrial Hyperplasia Induced by Ovariectomy Combined with Estrogen, Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013;76:51-56. |
| Helbling, Ignacio M, et al., The Optimization of an Intravaginal Ring Releasing Progesterone Using a Mathematical Model, Pharm Res, vol. 31 pp. 795-808, 2014, Springer Science. |
| Helmy et al., Estrogenic Effect of Soy Phytoestrogens on the Uterus of Ovariectomized Female Rats, Clinic Pharmacol Biopharmaceut, 2014, S2, 7 pages. |
| Henderson, V.W., Alzheimer's disease: Review of hormone therapy trials and implications for treatment and prevention after . . . , J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Henriksen, Thormod, et al., An ENDOR Sturdy of Radiation-Induced Molecular Damage to Progesterone, Jour. of Mag. Resonance, vol. 63, pp. 333-342, 1985, Acedemic Press, Inc. |
| Herman, Anna et al., “Essential oils and their constituents as skin penetration enhancer for transdermal drug delivery: a review,” 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, pp. 1-13. |
| Hodis, H.N., Mack, W.J., Hormone replacement therapy and the association with heart disease and overall mortality: Clinical . . . , J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Holm et al., “Examination of oral absorption and lymphatic transport of halofantrine in a triple-cannulated canine model after administration in self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) containing structured triglycerides,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 20 (2003) 91-97. |
| Hospital, Michel, et al., X-ray Crystallography of Estrogens and Their Binding to Receptor Sites, Mol. Pharmacology, vol. 8 pp. 438-445, Acedemic Press, Inc., 1972. |
| Hostynek, JJ, Predictinga bsorptiono f fragrancec hemicalst hrough human skin, j. Soc.C osmeCt. hem.,4 6, 221-229 (Jul./Aug. 1995). |
| Hulsmann, Stefan, Stability of Extruded 17B-Estradiol Solid Dispersions, Pharmaceutical Development and Tech., vol. 6(2) pp. 223-229, 2001, Marcel Dekker, Inc. |
| Humberstone, Andrew et al., “Lipid-based vehicles for the oral delivery of poorly water soluble drugs,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 25 (1997) 103-128. |
| Hurn et al., Estrogen as a Neuroprotectant in Stroke, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 20:631-652, 2000, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia. |
| Hyder et al., Synthetic Estrogen 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol Induces Pattern of Uterine Gene Expression Similar to Endogenous Estrogen 17β-Estradiol, JPET 290(2):740-747, 1999. |
| Udder, Salima, et al., Physicochemical properties of Progesterone, SciFinder, pp. 1-26, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Johanson, Gunnar, Toxicity Review of Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether and its Acetate Ester, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2000, vol. 30, No. 3 , pp. 307-345 (abstract only). http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10408440091159220. |
| Johnson, William S, et al., Racemic Progesterone, Tetrahedron Letters No. 4, pp. 193-196, 1963, Pergamon Press Ltd., Great Britain. |
| Joshi et al., Detection and synthesis of a progestagen-dependent protein in human endometrium, J Reprod Fert (1980) 59, 273-285. |
| Kanno et al., The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Uterotrophic Bioassay to Screen Compounds for in Vivo Estrogenic Responses: Phase 1, Environmental Health Perspectives ⋅ vol. 109 | No. 8 | Aug. 2001, pp. 785-794. |
| Karande, et al. Enhancement of transdermal drug delivery via synergistic action of chemicals, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1788:2362-2373, Sep. 2009. |
| Karlberg et al., Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens, Contact Dermatitis, 1992: 26: 332-340. |
| Karlberg et al., Influence of an anti-oxidant on the formation of allergenic compounds during auto-oxication of d-limonene, Ann. Occup. Hyg., vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 199-207, 1994. |
| Kaunitz, Andrew M., Extended duration use of menopausal hormone therapy, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, 2014, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1-3. |
| Khalil, Sah, Stability and Dissolution Rates of Corticosteroids in Polyethylene Glycol Solid Dispersions, Drug Dev. & Indus. Pharm., vol. 10(5) pp. 771-787, 1984, Marcel Dekker. |
| Kharode et al., The Pairing of a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator, B1zedoxifene, with Conjugated Estrogens as a New Paradigm for the Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms and Osteoporosis Prevention, Endocrinology 149(12):6084-6091, 2008. |
| Kim et al., Safety Evaluation and Risk Assessment of d-Limonene, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews, 2013, 16:1, 17-38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2013.769418. |
| Kincl et al., Increasing Oral Bioavailability of Progesterone by Formulation, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry, 1978, vol. 9, pp. 83-84. |
| Knuth et al., Hydrogel delivery systems for vaginal and oral applications: Formulation and biological considerations, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 11, No. 1-2, Jul.-Aug. 1993, pp. 137-167. |
| Koga et al., Enhancing mechanism of Labrasol on intestinal membrane permeability of the hydrophilic drug gentamicin sulfate, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 64 (2006) 82-91. |
| Komm et al., B1zedoxifene Acetate: A Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator with Improved Selectivity, Endocrinology 146(9):3999-4008, 2005. |
| Korkmaz, Filiz, Byophysical Studies of Progesterone-Model Membrane Interactions, Thesis, Grad. School of Nat. and App. Sci. of The Middle East Tech. University, Sep. 2003. |
| Kotiyan, P.N., Stability indicating HPTLC method for the estimation of estradiol, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 22 pp. 667-671, 2000, Elsevier. |
| Krzyminiewski, R, et al., EPR Study of the Stable Radical in a y-Irradiated Single Crystal of Progesterone, Jour. of Mag. Resonance, vol. 46 pp. 300-305, 1982, Acedemic Press. |
| Kubli-Garfias, C, et al., Ab initio calculations of the electronic structure of glucocorticoids, Jour. of Mol. Structure, Theochem, vol. 454 pp. 267-275, 1998, Elsevier. |
| Kubli-Garfias, Carlos, Ab initio study of the electronic structure of progesterone and related progestins, Jour. of Mol. Structure, Theochem vol. 425, pp. 171-179, 1998, Elsevier (abstract only). |
| Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Grimm. Zur Unterscheidung von losungsmittelhaltigen pseudopolymorphen Kristallformen und polymorphen Modifikationen bei Steroidhormonen.II, Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 1, pp. 127-139, 1968. |
| Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Junger and Kofler. Thermo-microscopic and spectrophotometric: Determination of steroid hormones, Microchemical Journal 9, pp. 105-133, 1965. |
| Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Kofler. Zur mikroskopischen Identitatsprufung und zur Polymorphie der Sexualhormone, Mikrochimica Acta, vol. 6, pp. 847-853, 1959. |
| Kuhnert-Brandstaetter and Linder. Zur Hydratbildung bei Steroidhormonen, Sci. Pharm, vol. 41(2), pp. 109-116, 1973. |
| Kumasaka et al., Effects of Various Forms of Progestin on the the Estrogen-Primed, Ovariectomized Rat, Endocrine Journal 1994, 41(2), 161-169. |
| Kuon et al., A Novel Optical Method to Assess Cervical Changes during Pregnancy and Use to Evaluate the Effects of Progestins on Term and Preterm Labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul. 2011 ; 205(1): 82.e15-82.e20. |
| Kuon et al., Actions of progestins for the inhibition of cervical ripening and uterine contractions to prevent preterm birth, FVV in Obgyn, 2012, 4 (2): 110-119. |
| Kuon et al., Pharmacological actions of progestins to inhibit cervical ripening and prevent delivery depend upon their properties, the route of administration and the vehicle, Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2010 ; 202(5): 455.e1-455.e9. |
| Labrie, et al., Intravaginal prasterone (DHEA) provides local action without clinically significant changes in serum concentrations of estrogens or androgens, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, vol. 138, pp. 359-367, 2013, Elsevier. |
| Lacey, J.V. Jr., The WHI ten year's later: An epidemiologist's view, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Lahiani-Skiba, Malika, Solubility and Dissolution Rate of Progesterone-Cyclodextrin . . . , Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, Informa Healthcare vol. 32, pp. 1043-1058, 2006. |
| Lancaster, Robert W, et al., The Polymorphism of Progesterone: Stabilization of a ‘Disappearing’ Polymorph by . . . , Jour. of Pharm. Sci., vol. 96(12) pp. 3419-3431, 2007, Wiley-Liss. |
| Land, Laura M, The influence of water content of triglyceride oils on the solubility of steriods, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 22(5) May 2005, Springer Science+Business Media. |
| Lane, Majella E., “Skin penetration enhancers,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics 447 (2013) 12-21. |
| Lauer et al., “Evaluation of the hairless rat as a model for in vivo percutaneous absorption,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 86, No. 1, Jan. 1997, pp. 13-18. |
| Leonetti et al., Transdermal progesterone cream as an alternative progestin in hormone therapy, Alternative Therapies, Nov./Dec. 2005, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 36-38. |
| Leonetti, Helene B, et al., Topical progesterone cream has an antiproliferative effect on estrogen-stimulated endometrium, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79(1), Jan. 2003. |
| Lewis, John G. et al., Caution on the use of saliva measurements to monitor absorption of progesterone from transdermal creams in postmenopausal women, Maturitas, The European Menopause Journal, vol. 41, pp. 1-6, 2002. |
| Li, Guo-Chian, Solid-state NMR analysis of steroidal conformation of 17a- and 17B-estradiol in the absence and presence of lipi . . . , Steroids, Elsevier, vol. 77, pp. 185-192, 2012. |
| Lindmark, Tuulikki et al., “Absorption Enhancement through Intracellular Regulation of Tight Junction Permeability by Medium Chain Fatty Acids in Caco-2 Cells,” JPET 284(1):362-369, 1998. |
| Lindmark, Tuulikki et al., “Mechanisms of Absorption Enhancement by Medium Chain Fatty Acids in Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cell Monolayers,” JPET 275(2):958-964, 1995. |
| Lobo, R.A., Foreword, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier. |
| Lopes, Luciana B. et al., Enhancement of transdermal delivery of progesterone using medium-chain mono and diglycerides as skin penetration enhancers, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 14:5, 524-529, Mar. 2009. |
| López-Belmonte, Corrigendum to “Comparative uterine effects on ovariectomized rats after repeated treatment with different vaginal estrogen formulations” [Maturitas 72 (2012) 353-358], Maturitas 74 (2013) 393, Elsevier. |
| Lucy et al., Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: lutenizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during . . . Biol Reprod Sep. 1986;35(2):300-311 (abstract only). |
| Lvova, M. SH., et al., Thermal Analysis in the Quality Control and Standardization of Some Drugs, J Thermal Anal., vol. 40 pp. 405-411, 1993, Wiley. |
| MacBride, Maire B. et al., “Vulvovaginal Atrophy,” Mayo Clin Proc, Jan. 2010, 85(1):87-94. |
| Madishetti et al., Development of domperidone bilayered matrix type transdermal patches: physicochemical, in vitro and ex vivo characterization, DARU vol. 18, No. 3, 2010, pp. 221-229. |
| Magness, R.R., et al., Estrone, Estradiol-17β and Progesterone Concentrations in Uterine Lymph and Systematic Blood throughout the Porcine Estrone Estrous Cycle, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 57, pp. 449-455, ISU, 1983. |
| Manson, JoAnn E. et al., “Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststoping phases of the women's health initiative randomized trials,” JAMA, Oct. 2, 2013, vol. 310, No. 13, pp. 1353-1368. |
| McGuffy, Irena, Softgel Technology as a Lipid-B1sed Delivery Tool for Bioavailability Enhancement, Catalent Pharma Solutions, Somerset, NJ, Mar. 2011. |
| Mesley, R.J., Clathrate Formation from Steroids, Chemistry and Industry, vol. 37 pp. 1594-1595, Sep. 1965. |
| Miao, Wenbin, et al., Chemical Properties of Progesterone, SciFinder, 2014, American Chemical Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Miles et al., Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of progesterone after administration bv'Intramuscular and vaginal routes: a comparative study, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 62, No. 3, Sep. 1994, pp. 485-490. |
| Miller et al., Safety and Feasibility of Topical Application of Limonene as a Massage Oil to the Breast, Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2012, 3, 749-754. |
| Monti, D. et al., Effect of different terpene-containing essential oils on permeation of estradiol through hairless mouse skin, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 237:209-24, 2002. |
| Mueck, A.O. et al., Genomic and non-genomic actions of progestogens in the breast, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol.Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Muramatsu, Mitsuo, Thermodynamic Relationship between a- and B-Forms of Crystalline Progesterone, J. Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 68(2) pp. 175-178, 1979, Amer. Pharm. Assoc. |
| Ng, Jo-Han et al., Advances in biodiesel fuel for application in compression ignition engines, Clean Techn Environ Policy, vol. 12, pp. 459-493, 2010, Springer-Verlag. |
| Nicklas, Martina, Preparation and characterization of marine sponge collagen nanoparticles and employment for the trans . . . , Drug Devel. & Indust. Pharmacy,35(9) pp. 1035, 2009. |
| Nilsson et al., Analysis of Contact Allergenic Compounds in Oxidized d-Limonene, Chromatographia vol. 42, No. 3/4, Feb. 1996, pp. 199-205. |
| Notelovitz, Morris, et al., Initial 17-b-Estradiol Dose for Treating Vasomotor Symptoms, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 95(5), pp. 726-731, part 1, May 2000, Elsevier. |
| NuGen, What is NuGen HP Hair Growth System. |
| NuGest900, NuGest 900™. |
| O'Leary, Peter, Salivary, but not serum or urinary levels of progesterone are elevated after topical application of pregersterone cream to pre-and post-menopausal women, Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 53 pp. 615-620, Blackwell Science 2000. |
| Opinion on the Diethylene Glycol Momoethyl Ether (DEGEE), Scientific Committee on Consumer Products, Dec. 19, 2006, 27 pages. |
| Outterson, K., The Drug Quality and Security Act—Mind the Gaps, n engl j med 370;2 nejm.org Jan. 9, 2014, pp. 97-99. |
| Pachman et al., “Management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: current treatment options, challenges and future directions,” International Journal of Women's Health, May 7, 2010. |
| Palamakula et al., Preparation and in Vitro Characterization of Self-Nanoemulsified Drug Delivery Systems of Coenzyme Q10 Using Chiral Essential Oil Components, Pharmaceutical Technology Oct. 2004, pp. 74-88. |
| Panay et al., The 2013 British Menopause Society & Women's Health Concern recommendations on hormone replacement therapy, Menopause International: The Integrated Journal of Postreproductive Health, published online May 23, 2013, Sage Publications. http://min.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/23/1754045313489645.1. |
| Panchangnula et al., Development and evaluation of an intracutaneous depot formulation of corticosteroids using Transcutol . . . , J Pharm Pharmacol. Sep. 1991;43(9):609-614 (abstract only). |
| Parasuraman et al., Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals, Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics | Jul.-Dec. 2010 | vol. 1 | Issue 2, pp. 87-93. |
| Park, Jeong-Sook, Solvent effects on physicochemical behavior of estradiols recrystalized for transdermal delivery, Arch Pharm Res, vol. 31(1), pp. 111-116, 2008. |
| Park, Jeong-Sook, Use of CP/MAS solid-state NMR for the characterization of solvate . . . , European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 60, pp. 407-412, 2005. |
| Parrish, Damon A., A new estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17b-diol solvate: estradiol-methanol-water, Crystal Structure Comm., Intn'l Union of Crystallography, ISSN 0108-2701, 2003. |
| Patel et al., Transdermal Drug Delivery System: A Review, www.thepharmajournal.com, vol. 1, No. 4, 2012, pp. 78-87. |
| Payne, R.S., et al., Examples of successful crystal structure prediction: polymorphs of primidone and progesterone, Intl. Jour. of Pharma., vol. 177 pp. 231-245, 1999, Elsevier. |
| PCCA, Apothogram, PCCA, May 2014, Houston, TX. |
| Persson, Linda C, et al., Physicochemical Properties of Progesterone Selecte, SciFinder, pp. 1-5, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Pfaus et al., Selective facilitation of sexual solicitation in the female rat by a melanocortin receptor agonist, PNAS, Jul. 6, 2004, vol. 101, No. 27, pp. 10201-10204. |
| Pheasant, Richard, Polymorphism of 17-Ethinylestradiol, Schering Corporation, Bloomfield, NJ, May 1950. |
| Pickles, VR, Cutaneous reactions to injection of progesterone solutions into the skin, Br Med Journal, Aug. 16, 1952, pp. 373-374. |
| Pinkerton et al., What are the concerns about custom-compounded “bioidentical” hormone therapy? Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, vol. 21, No. 12, 2014,pp. 1-3. |
| Pinkerton, J.V., Thomas, S., Use of SERMs for treatment in postmenopausal women, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier. |
| Pisegna, Gisia L, A High-pressure Vibrational Spectroscopic Study of Polymorphism in Steroids . . . , Thesis, McGill University, Dept. of Chem, Nov. 1999, Natl. Lib. of Canada. |
| Portman, David et al., One-year treatment persistence with local estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women diagnosed as having vaginal atrophy, Menopause, vol. 22, No. 11, 2015, pp. 000/000 (8 pages). |
| Position Statement, Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of the North American Menopause Society (NAMS), Menopause, vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 888-902. |
| Potluri, Praveen and Gum V. Betageri, “Mixed-micellar proliposomal systems for enhanced oral delivery of progesterone,” Drug Delivery, 2006, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 227-232. |
| Practice Bulletin No. 141, Management of Menopausal Symptoms, Obstetrics & Gynecology, ACOG, vol. 123, No. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 202-216. |
| Prajapati Hetal N. et al., “A Comparative Evaluation of Mono-, Di- and Triglyceride of Medium Chain Fatty Acids by Lipid/Surfactant/Water Phase Diagram, Solubility Determination and Dispersion Testing for Application in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form Development,” Pharm Res. Jan. 2012; 29(1): 285-305. Published online Aug. 23, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0541-3. |
| Prajapati Hetal N. et al., “Effect of Difference in Fatty Acid Chain Lengths of Medium-Chain Lipids on Lipid/Surfactant/Water Phase Diagrams and Drug Solubility,” J. Excipients and Food Chem. 2 (3) 2011:73-88. |
| Prajapati, Hetal N, et al., A comparative Evaluation of Mono-, Di- and Triglyceride of Medium Chain Fatty Acids by Lipid/Surfactant/Water, Springerlink.com, pp. 1-21, Apr. 2011. |
| Prausnitz et al., Transdermal drug delivery, Nat Biotechnol. Nov. 2008 ; 26(11): 1261-1268. |
| Price, Sarah L, The computational prediction of pharmaceutical crystal structures and polymorphism, Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 56 pp. 301-319, 2004, Elsevier. |
| Product Information Sheet, Body B1lance Cream, Tahitian Noni International, 2013, 1 page. |
| Product Safety Assessment: Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether, Created: Sep. 24, 2007 The Dow Chemical Company Page, 5 pages. |
| Progesterone, The Merck Index Online, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013, search Feb. 17, 2014 https://www.rsc.org/Merck-Index/monograph/print/mono1500007889/progesterone?q=authorize. |
| Progynova TS 100, available online at file:///C:/Users/Call%20Family/Desktop/Progynova%20TS%20100%2012%20Patches_Pack%20%28Estradiol%20Hemihydrate%29.html, 2010. |
| Provider Data Sheet, About Dried Blood Spot Testing, ZRT Laboratory, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Rahn et al., Vaginal Estrogen for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause a Systematic Review, Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(6): 1147-56. |
| Rao, Rajeswara et al., “Intra Subject Variability of Progesterone 200 mg Soft Capsules in Indian Healthy Adult Postmenopausal Female Subjects under Fasting Conditions,” J Bioequiv Availab. 2014, 6: 139-143. |
| Rao, R. et al., “The Affect of Capmul, Labrafil and Transcutol on Progesterone 100 Mg Soft Capsules Bioavailability in Indian Healthy Adult Postmenopausal Female Subjects Under Fasting Conditions,” Bioequivalence & Bioavailability, 7(2):095-107, 2015. |
| Reisman et al., Topical Application of the Synthetic Triterpenoid RTA 408 Protects Mice from Radiation-Induced Dermatitis, Radiation Research 181, 512-520 (2014). |
| Rosilio, V, et al., Physical Aging of Progesterone-Loaded Poly(D,L,-lactide-co-glycolide) Microspheres, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15(5) pp. 794-799,1998, Plenum Pub. Corp. |
| Ross et al., Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of the endometrial effects of a vaginal progesterone gel in estrogen-treated postmenopausal women, AnnJ Obstet Gynecol, Oct. 1997, vol. 177, No. 4, pp. 937-941. |
| Ruan et al., Systemic progesterone therapy—Oral, vaginal, injections and even transdermal? Maturitas 79 (2014) 248-255, Elsevier. |
| Salem, HF, Sustained-release progesterone nanosuspension following intramuscular injection in ovariectomized rats, International Journal of Nanomedicine 2010:5 943-954, Dove Press. |
| Sallee, Verney L. et al., “Determinants of intestinal mucosal uptake of short- and medium-chain fatty acids and alcohols,” Journal of Lipid Research, 1973, vol. 14, 475-484. |
| Salole, Eugene G., Estradiol, Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, vol. 15, pp. 283-318, 1986. |
| Salole, Eugene G., The physicochemical properties of oestradiol, Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 635-648, 1987. |
| Santen, R.J., Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Santen, RJ, Vaginal administration of estradiol: effects of dose, preparation and timing on plasma estradiol levels, Climacteric 2014;17:1-14. |
| Sarkar, B1SU, et al., Chemical Stability of Progesterone in Compounded Topical Preparations using PLO Transdermal Cream™ and HRT Cream™ B1se . . . , J Steroids Horm Sci, 4:2, 2013. |
| Sarpal, K. et al., “Self emulsifying drug delivery systems: a strategy to improve oral bioavailability,” Current Research & Information on Pharmaceuticals Sciences (CRIPS), 2010, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 42-49. |
| Sarrel, et al., The Mortality Toll of Estrogen Avoidance: An Analysis of Excess Deaths Among Hysterectomized Women Aged 50 to 59 Years, American Journal of Public Health, Research and Practice, e1-e6. Published online ahead of print Jul. 18, 2013. |
| Satyanarayana, D, et al., Aqueous Solubility Predictions of Aliphatic Alcohols, Alkyl Substituted Benzoates and Steroids, Asian J. Chem., vol. 9 (3) pp. 418-426, 1997. |
| Scavarelli, Rosa Maria, et al., Progesterone and Hydrate or Solvate, SciFinder, pp. 1-2, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society. |
| Schindler, A.E., The “newer” progestogens and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HRT), J. Steroid Biochem.Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Schindler, Aldof E. et al., Classification and pharmacology of progestins, Maturitas 46S1 (2003) S7-S16. |
| Schutte et al., A tissue engineered human endometrial stroma that responds to cues for secretory differentiation, decidualization and menstruation, Fertil Steril. Apr. 2012 ; 97(4): 997-1003, Elsevier. |
| Schweikart et al., Comparative Uterotrophic Effects of Endoxifen and Tamoxifen in Ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley Rats, Toxicologic Pathology, 42: 1188-1196, 2014. |
| SciFinder Scholar Prednisone Chemical Properties, SciFinder, 2014, pp. 1-7, National Library of Medicine. |
| SciFinder Scholar Prednisone Physical Properties, SciFinder, 2014, pp. 1-10, Natioinal Library of Medicine. |
| SciFinder Scholar Progesterone Experimental Properties, SciFinder, pp. 1-9, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society. |
| Search Report, Extended European Search Report for EP13741053.6, dated Jul. 1, 2015. |
| Search Report, Extended European Search Report for EP13807188.1, dated Nov. 23, 2015. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US12/66406, dated Jan. 24, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/23309, dated Apr. 9, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/46442, dated Nov. 1, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/46443, dated Oct. 31, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/46444, dated Oct. 31, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US13/46445, dated Nov. 1, 2013. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US14/61811, dated Jan. 21, 2015. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US15/23041, dated Jun. 30, 2015. |
| Search Report, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US15/42621, dated Oct. 29, 2015. |
| Serantoni, Foresti, et al., 4-Pregnen-3,20-dione (progesterone, form II), Crystal Structure Comm., vol. 4(1) pp. 189-192, 1975, CAPLUS Database. |
| Shao et al., Review Open Access Direct effects of metformin in the endometrium: a hypothetical mechanism for the treatment of women with PCOS and endometrial carcinoma, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 2014, 33(1):41, 11 pages. |
| Sharma, H.C., et al., Physical Properties of Progesterone Selected Refer, SciFinder, pp. 1-5, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Shrier et al., “Mucosal Immunity of the Adolescent Female Genital Tract,” Journal of Adolescent Health, 2003; 32:183-186. |
| Shufelt et al., Hormone therapy dose, formulation, route delivery, and risk of cardiovascular events in women: findings from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, vol. 21, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1-7, 2013. |
| Siew, Adeline, moderator, Bioavailability Enhancement with Lipid-Based Drug-Delivery Systems, Pharmaceutical Technology, Aug. 2014, pp. 28, 30-31. |
| Sigma-Aldrich, Progesterone-Water Soluble: powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture), MSDS available online: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/p7556. |
| Simon et al., Effective Treatment of Vaginal atrophy with an Ultra-low-dose estradiol vaginal tablet, Obstetrics & Gynocology, vol. 112, No. 5, Nov. 2008, pp. 1053-1060. |
| Simon, James A., What if the Women's Health Initiative had used transdermal estradiol and oral progesterone instead? Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, 2014, vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 1-15. |
| Sitruk-Ware et al., Progestogens in hormonal replacement therapy: new molecules, risks, and benefits, Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society. vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 6-15, 2002. |
| Sitruk-Ware, Regine, “Pharmacological profile of progestins,” Maturitas 47 (2004) 277-283. |
| Sitruk-Ware, Regine, Oral Micronized Progesterone—Bioavailability pharmacokinetics, pharmacological and therapeutic implications—A review, Contraception, Oct. 1987, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 373-402. |
| Smith et al., Lower Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Postmenopausal Women Taking Oral Estradiol Compared with Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens, JAMA Internal Medicine, Published online Sep. 30, 2013, E1-E7. jamainternalmedicine.com. |
| Smyth et al., Summary of Toxicological Data, a 2-Yr Study of Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether in Rats, Fd Cosmet. Toxicol. vol. 2, pp. 641-642, 1964. |
| Stanczyk et al., Thereaputically equivalent pharmacokinetic profile across three application sistes for AG200-15, a novel low-estrogen dose contraceptive patch, Contraception, 87 (2013) pp. 744-749. |
| Stanczyk, F.Z. et al., “Percutaneous administration of progesterone: blood levels and endometrial protection,” Menopause: The Journal of the North American Menopause Society, 2005, vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 232-237. |
| Stanczyk, F.Z. et al., Ethinyl estradiol and 17β-estradiol in combined oral contraceptives: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and risk assessment, Contraception 87 (Jun. 2013) vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 706-727. |
| Stanczyk, F.Z., “All progestins are not created equal,” Steroids 68 (2003) 879-880. |
| Stanczyk, F.Z., “Treatment of postmenopausal women with topical progesterone creams and gels: are they effective?” Climacteric 2014;17 (Suppl 2):8-11. |
| Stanczyk, F.Z., Bhavnani, B.R., Current views of hormone therapy for the management and treatment of postmenopausal women, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2014), Elsevier. |
| Stein, Emily A, et al., Progesterone Physical Properties, SciFinder, pp. 1-46, Feb. 24, 2014, American Chem. Society & US Natl. Lib. of Med. |
| Stephenson et al., “Transdermal progesterone: Effects on Menopausal symptoms and on thrombotic, anticoagulant, and inflammatory factors in postmenopausal women,” Int J Pharmaceutical Compounding, vol. 12, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2008, pp. 295-304. |
| Strickley, Robert T., Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations, Pharmaceutical Research Feb. 2004, vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 201-230 (abstract only). |
| Strocchi, Antonino, Fatty Acid Composition, and Triglyceride Structure of Corn Oil, Hydrogenated Corn Oil, and Corn Oil Margarine, Journal of Food Science, vol. 47, pp. 36-39, 1981. |
| Struhar, M, et al., Estradiol Benzoate: Preparation of an injection suspension . . . , SciFinder, Cesko-Slovenska Farmacie, vol. 27(6), pp. 245-249, 1978, Bratislava, Czech. |
| Sullivan et al., “A review of the nonclinical safety of Transcutol®, a highly purified form of diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (DEGEE) used as a pharmaceutical excipient,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, 72 (2014) pp. 40-50. |
| Sun, Jidong, D-Limonene: Safety and Clinical Applications, Alternative Medicine Review vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, pp. 259-264. |
| Tait, Alex D, Characterization of the Prod. from the Oxidation of Progesterone with Osmium Tetroxide, Dept of Investigative Med., Univ. Cambridge, Gt. Britain pp. 531-542, 1972. |
| Takacs M. et al., The light sensitivity of corticosteroids in crystalline form, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae, vol. 66 (5-6) pp. 137-140, 1991, Hardin Library. |
| Tan, Melvin S. et al., A Sensitive Method for the Determination of Progesterone in Human Plasma by LC-MS-MS, M1025, Cedra Corporation, Austin, Texas. |
| Tang et al., Effect of Estrogen and Progesterone on the Development of Endometrial Hyperplasia in the Fischer Rat, Biology of Reproduction 31, 399-413 (1984). |
| Tas et al., Comparison of antiproliferative effects of metformine and progesterone on estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia in rats, Gynecol Endocrinol, Early Online: 1-4, 2013. http://informahealthcare.com/gye. |
| Tella, S.H., Gallagher, J.C., Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Thomas, Joshua, et al., The effect of water solubility of solutes on their flux through human skin in vitro: An . . . , Intl. J. of Pharmaceut., vol. 339 pp. 157-167, 2007, Elsevier. |
| Thomas, Peter, Characteristics of membrane progestin receptor alpha (mPRα) and progesterone membrane receptor component 1 (PGMRC1) and their roles in mediating rapid progestin actions, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29 (2008) 292-312. |
| Tripathi, R, et al., Study of Polymorphs of Progesterone by Novel Melt Sonocrystallization Technique: A Technical Note, AAPS PhamSciTech, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 2010. |
| Trommer et al., Overcoming the stratum Corneum: The modulation of Skin Penetration, Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2006;19:106-121. |
| Tuleu et al., “Comparative Bioavailability Study in Dogs of a Self-Emulsifying Formulation of Progesterone Presented in a Pellet and Liquid Form Compared with an Aqueous Suspension of Progesterone,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 93, No. 6, Jun. 2004, pp. 1495-1502. |
| Ueda et al., Topical and Transdermal Drug Products, Pharmacopeial Forum, vol. 35(3) [May-Jun. 2009], 750-754. |
| USP, 401 Fats and Fixed Oils, Chemical Tests, Second Suplement to USP36-NF 31, pp. 6141-6151, 2013. |
| USP, Certificate-Corn Oil, Lot G0L404, Jul. 2013. |
| USP, Lauroyl Polyoxylglycerides, Safety Data Sheet, US, 5611 Version #02, pp. 1-9, 2013. |
| USP, Monographs: Progesterone, USP29, www.pharmacopeia.cn/v29240/usp29nf24s0_m69870.html, search done: Feb. 25, 2014. |
| USP, Official Monographs, Corn Oil, NF 31, pp. 1970-1971, Dec. 2013. |
| USP, Official Monographs, Lauroyl Polyoxylglycerides, NF 31, pp. 2064-2066, Dec. 2013. |
| USP, Official Monographs, Medium Chain Triglycerides, NF 31, pp. 2271-2272, Dec. 2013. |
| USP, Official Monographs, Mono- and Di-glycerides, NF 31, pp. 2101, Dec. 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515, filed Dec. 12, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515, filed Oct. 26, 2012 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,515, filed Sep. 11, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002, filed Mar. 20, 2013 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002, filed Jul. 16, 2013 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/684,002, filed Dec. 6, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,362, filed Mar. 16, 2015 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428, filed Apr. 14, 2015 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,428, filed Jul. 2, 2015 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545, filed Feb. 18, 2014_Non_Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,545, filed Jul. 14, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Feb. 20, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Mar. 27, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Jul. 2, 2014_Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,562, filed Dec. 10, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571, filed Mar. 28, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,571, filed Jul. 15, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582, filed Apr. 29, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582, filed Jun. 17, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582, filed Nov. 7, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,582, filed Jan. 22, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598, filed May 13, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598, filed Jul. 3, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,598, filed Dec. 10, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612, filed Mar. 20, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612, filed Oct. 30, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,612, filed Nov. 26, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623, filed Mar. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623, filed Jul. 18, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,623, filed Dec. 15, 2014_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655, filed Jul. 3, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655, filed Dec. 8, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/106,655, filed Jun. 19, 2015 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554, filed Dec. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/125,554, filed Apr. 14, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048, filed Nov. 4, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/136,048, filed Mar. 12, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814, filed Oct. 1, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,814, filed Feb. 13, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864, filed Oct. 2, 2014_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/475,864, filed Feb. 11, 2015_Notice_of_Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230, filed Dec. 5, 2014_Restriction_Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/521,230, filed Feb. 18, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,051, filed Apr. 7, 2015_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/690,955, filed Feb. 1, 2016_Non-Final_Office_Action. |
| Utian, Wulf H, et al., Relief of vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy with lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75(6) pp. 1065, Jun. 2001. |
| Voegtline et al., Dispatches from the interface of salivary bioscience and neonatal research, Frontiers in Endocrinology, Mar. 2014, vol. 5, article 25, 8 pages. |
| Waddell et al., Distribution and metabolism of topically applied progesterone in a rat model, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 80 (2002) 449-455. |
| Waddell et al., The Metabolic Clearance of Progesterone in the Pregnant Rat: Absence of a Physiological Role For the Lung, Biology of Reproduction 40, 1188-1193 (1989). |
| Walter et al., The role of progesterone in endometrial angiogenesis in pregnant and ovariectomised mice, Reproduction (2005) 129 765-777. |
| Weber, E.J., Corn Lipids, Cereal Chem., vol. 55(5), pp. 572-584, The American Assoc of Cereal Chem, Sep.-Oct. 1978. |
| Weber, M.T., et al., Cognition and mood in perimenopause: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. (2013), Elsevier. |
| Weintraub, Arlene, “Women fooled by untested hormones from compounding pharmacies,”Forbes, Feb. 20, 2015; retrieved online at http://onforb.es/1LlUm1V_on Feb. 23, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Whitehead et al., Absorption and metabolism of oral progesterone, The British Medical Journal, vol. 280, No. 6217 (Mar. 22, 1980), pp. 825-827, BMJ Publishing Group. |
| Wiranidchapong, Chutima, Method of preparation does not affect the miscibility between steroid hormone and polymethacrylate, Thermochimica Acta 485, Elsevier, pp. 57, 2009. |
| Wood et al., Effects of estradiol with micronized progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate on risk markers for breast cancer in postmenopausal monkeys, Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 101:125-134. |
| Wren et al., Effect of sequential transdermal progesterone cream on endometrium, bleeding pattern, and plasma progesterone and salivary progesterone levels in postmenopausal women, Climacteric, 2000, 3(3), pp. 155-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13697130008500109. |
| Wu et al., Gene Expression Profiling of the Effects of Castration and Estrogen Treatment in the Rat Uterus, Biology of Reproduction 69, 1308-1317 (2003). |
| Yalkowsky, Samuel H, & Valvani, Shri C, Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water, J. of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 69(8) pp. 912-922, 1980. |
| Yalkowsky, Samuel H, Handbook of Acqueous Solubility Data, Solutions, 2003, pp. 1110-1111, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Wash. D.C. |
| Yue, W., Genotoxic metabolites of estradiol in breast: potential mechanism of estradiol induced carcinogenesis, Journal of Steroid Biochem & Mol Biology, vol. 86 pp. 477-486, 2003. |
| Zava, David T. et al., Percutaneous absorption of progesterone, Maturitas 77 (2014) 91-92, Elsevier. |
| Zava, David T., Topical Progesterone Delivery and Levels in Serum, Saliva, Capillary Blood, and Tissues, Script, ZRT Laboratory, pp. 4-5. http://www.zrtlab.com/component/docman/cat_view/10-publications?Itemid. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170216310 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62296552 | Feb 2016 | US | |
| 62324838 | Apr 2016 | US | |
| 62329940 | Apr 2016 | US | |
| 62348820 | Jun 2016 | US | |
| 62264309 | Dec 2015 | US | |
| 61745313 | Dec 2012 | US | |
| 61932140 | Jan 2014 | US | |
| 61894411 | Oct 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14521230 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Child | 15372385 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2013/046446 | Jun 2013 | US |
| Child | 14521230 | US |
