Vehicle wheel tooth

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6632045
  • Patent Number
    6,632,045
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 12, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 14, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A tooth for a land compactor vehicle wheel comprises a base and a wall extending upwardly from the periphery of the base towards a crest. The crest has a peripheral profile defined by the upper edge of the wall and the wall is shaped such that the crest face is generally “M” shaped.
Description




CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION




Priority is claimed to British Patent Application No. 9828424.3, filed Dec. 24, 1998.




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to a tooth for a vehicle wheel. In particular, the invention relates to an improved tooth design for a landfill compactor vehicle wheel.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Large steel-wheeled vehicles, generally referred to as landfill compactor vehicles, are conventionally used to compact waste materials disposed of in landfill sites. Such vehicles have large toothed wheels (typically having a diameter of the order of 4 ft to 5.5 ft) which provide both traction for the vehicle and a means for breaking up and compacting the waste material.




The design of conventional landfill compactor vehicle wheels, and in particular the wheel teeth (which in many cases are removable so that they may be replaced when worn out) varies widely. With conventional tooth designs there can be a tendency for the compactor vehicle wheels to “flick and fluff” the tipping face of the landfill site. In other words, rather than being compacted into the surface, some relatively light materials can break away from the service and be disbursed by the wind which is clearly undesirable. One way of combating this problem is to import a cover which is spread on the face of the site. The problem has, however, increased in recent years with the introduction of Landfill Tax in the UK which has reduced the amount of heavy materials being disposed of in landfill sites. This has brought about a corresponding increase in wind-blown litter and/or an increase in the amount of cover material needed to combat the problem.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the above problem. The present invention achieves this by the provision of an improved vehicle tooth design.




It is a further object of the invention to provide a new method of manufacturing a vehicle wheel tooth.




According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a vehicle wheel tooth comprising a base, a wall extending upwardly from the periphery of the base towards a crest, the crest having a peripheral profile defined by the upper edge of the wall, wherein the wall is shaped such that the crest face is generally “M” shaped.




Preferably the wall is shaped by three depressions each defining a generally “V” or “U” shaped indentation in the peripheral profile of the crest face. Each of said depressions defines a channel in the wall of the tooth which extends from the crest towards the base, the channels mutually diverging. The channels preferably become both shallower and narrower towards the base of the tooth.




The tooth may for instance be shaped such that in the absence of said depressions the crest would have a generally rectangular peripheral profile with two opposing side edges.




In preferred embodiments of the tooth the base is generally rectangular having opposing front and rear edges and two opposing side edges shorter than said front and rear edges, wherein said wall comprises four faces (which are preferably mutually inclined) extending upwardly from respective base edges towards said crest.




According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a vehicle wheel tooth, the method comprising:




i) casting a base for the tooth by pouring a molten metal or metal alloy of a first type into a mold which defines the desired configuration of a base for the tooth;




ii) removing the base from the first mold and placing the pre-cast base in a second mold which defines the desired configuration of a cap for the tooth;




iii) pouring a molten metal or metal alloy of a second type into said second mold to cast the cap directly on to the pre-cast base.




According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a vehicle wheel tooth comprising a pre-cast base cast from a metal or metal alloy of a first type, and a cap cast directly onto the pre-cast base from a metal or metal alloy of a second type, the base and cap being keyed together.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES




Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a plan view from above of a tooth in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a side view of the tooth of

FIG. 1

looking in the direction of arrow Y of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a side view of the tooth of

FIG. 1

looking in the direction of arrow X of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 4

is a cross-section through the tooth of

FIG. 1

taken on the line


4





4


;





FIG. 5

is a cross-section through the tooth of

FIG. 1

taken on the line


5





5


;





FIG. 6

is a plan view of a tooth in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a side view of the tooth of

FIG. 6

looking in the direction of arrow C of

FIG. 6

;





FIG. 8

is an end view of the tooth of

FIG. 6

looking in the direction of arrow D of

FIG. 6

;





FIG. 9

is a plan view from above of a base for a tooth in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 10

is a side view of the tooth base of

FIG. 9

looking in the direction of arrow E of

FIG. 9

;





FIG. 11

is an end view of the base of

FIG. 9

looking in the direction of arrow F of

FIG. 9

;





FIG. 12

is a plan view of a cap of the tooth in accordance with the third embodiment of the present invention;





FIG. 13

is a side view of the cap of

FIG. 12

looking in the direction of arrow G of

FIG. 12

;





FIG. 14

is an end view of the cap of

FIG. 12

looking in the direction of arrow H of

FIG. 12

; and





FIG. 15

is an underneath view of the cap of FIG.


12


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to the drawings, the illustrated teeth are designed for fitting to a land fill compactor vehicle wheel. Only details of the tooth necessary for an understanding of the present invention will be described and thus there will be no description of other details of a land fill vehicle or of a land fill vehicle wheel.




Referring first to

FIGS. 1

to


5


, the illustrated tooth comprises a generally rectangular base


1


which is adapted for welding to a steel wheel in a conventional way, and a cap


10


. The cap


10


has two opposed side walls


2


and opposed front and rear walls


3


and


4


(having regard to the direction of rotation of the wheel) extend upwardly from respective edges of the base


1


and are mutually inclined towards a crest


5


. The peripheral profile of the crest


5


is defined by upper edges of the walls


2


,


3


and


4


and is described in more detail below.




The side walls


2


are identical and are trapezoid in shape tapering upwardly towards the crest


5


. The angle of incline of the side walls


2


greatly reduces the tendency of the tooth to “flick and fluff” the tipping face. The angle of incline is selected relative to the angle of repose at which aggregates, when graded, settle in the tipping surface. Walls


3


and


4


are also generally trapezoid in shape but are provided with various contours defined by scallops


6


,


7


and


8


and by ramped portions


9


and


10


.




Scallops


6


and


7


are formed side by side in an upper portion of end wall


3


and cut into the crest face


5


so as to define a generally W shaped indentation in the peripheral profile of the crest face


5


. The lower ends of the scallops


6


and


7


terminate short of the base, immediately above the ramp portion


9


. Scallop


8


is formed in an upper portion of the opposing rear wall


4


and terminates immediately above the ramp portion


10


. The scallop forms a generally V shaped indentation in the peripheral profile of the crest face


5


of substantially the same width as the W shaped indention formed by scallops


6


and


7


. The depressions formed in the rear wall


4


by the scallops


6


,


7


and


8


become narrower and shallower towards the base and the scallops


6


and


7


curve away from one another.




It will thus be seen that the provision of the scallops


6


,


7


and


8


gives the crest face


5


a generally M shaped profile, the scallops


6


,


7


and


8


forming channels in the walls


3


and


4


which extend from the crest face


5


part way towards the base.




In use, the channels provided by the scallops


6


,


7


and


8


provide an advantageous effect on the action of the tooth as the wheel travels over a land fill site surface. That is, waste material is directed and compressed in three diverging directions. Thus, each time a tooth impacts upon the surface it exerts a three-way splitting and compressing action on the material which reduces the particle size of the waste and makes it much less likely for the waste to be carried away by the wind. The compression also minimizes oxygen voids thereby saving air space and increasing compaction.




It will be appreciated that modifications may be made to the tooth design described above. One such possible modification is shown in

FIGS. 6

to


8


. Various features of the illustrated design are identified by reference numerals corresponding to those above. It will thus be appreciated that the design is very similar to that described above. The most significant differences are that the side walls


2


are not inclined and the ramp portions


9


and


10


are omitted, the scallops


6


,


7


and


8


extending further towards the base of the tooth.




Other possible modifications will be apparent to the appropriately skilled person.




As mentioned above, the base


1


of the tooth is adapted to be welded to a steel wheel and therefore must be constructed from a weldable metal. However, such weldable metals are not generally sufficiently hard to withstand the abrasive wear to which the tooth will in use be subjected. Thus, with preferred teeth according to the present invention, such as those described above, a harder metal (such as a chromium iron alloy) is used for the cap


10


than for the base


1


. It would not be practical to construct the whole tooth from such a hard metal as such metals are not readily weldable.




The preferred method of manufacturing such a “two-part” tooth in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to

FIGS. 9

to


15


which illustrate separately the base


1


and cap


10


of a tooth which is very similar to those described above (and thus like reference numerals are used for like features).




The tooth base


1


, which is illustrated in

FIGS. 9

,


10


and


11


, is cast in a first mold from a weldable metal, such as a carbon steel, using conventional casting techniques. The pre-cast base


1


is then placed into a second mold shaped according to the desired cap


10


. The cap


10


is then cast directly onto the base by pouring a molten metal (such as a chromium iron alloy) into the second mold onto the pre-cast base


1


. The cap


10


then solidifies around the base


1


to give the completed tooth.




The base


1


is designed with a number of mating formations into which the molten cap metal flows to ensure that when the cap solidifies the cap


10


and base


1


are firmly keyed together. The particular mating formations of the illustrated base


1


are the recesses


11


, crenulations


12


and the apertured portion


13


.




The casting conditions of the cap


10


must be controlled to avoid melting away the mating formations of the base


1


. The resulting cap


10


therefore has formations corresponding to the base formations as is illustrated in

FIGS. 12

to


15


. Although the cap


10


is shown separate from the base


1


it will be appreciated that the two are not separable once cast.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing a vehicle wheel tooth, the method comprising:casting a base for the tooth by pouring a first molten metal or metal alloy into a first mold which defines the desired configuration of a base for the tooth; removing the base from the first mold and placing the base in a second mold which defines the desired configuration of a cap for the tooth; pouring a second molten metal or metal alloy into the second mold to cast the cap directly on to the base, wherein the base is provided with formations which receive the second molten metal or metal alloy during the casting step such that the cap is keyed into the base.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first molten metal or metal alloy is of a type which may be readily welded to a vehicle wheel tooth.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the first molten metal or metal alloy is a carbon based steel.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second metal or metal alloy is of a type which is more resistant to abrasion than the first metal or metal alloy.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the second metal or metal alloy is a chromium iron alloy.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the formations include a raised portion which has an aperture extending therethrough.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the formations include indentations or cavities formed in a surface of the base.
  • 8. A vehicle wheel tooth comprising:a pre-cast base of a first metal or metal alloy, comprising a plurality of formations; and a cap of a second metal or metal alloy cast onto the pre-cast base, wherein the formations of the pre-cast base are adapted to receive the cap, firmly keying the pre-cast base and cap together.
  • 9. The vehicle wheel tooth according to claim 8, wherein the first metal or metal alloy is readily weldable to a vehicle wheel.
  • 10. The vehicle wheel tooth according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the second metal or metal alloy is harder and more resistant to abrasion than the first metal or metal alloy.
  • 11. The vehicle wheel tooth of claim 8, wherein the formations comprise a raised portion which has an aperture extending therethrough.
  • 12. The vehicle wheel tooth of claim 8, wherein the formations include indentations or cavities formed in a surface of the pre-cast base.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9828424 Dec 1998 GB
US Referenced Citations (28)
Number Name Date Kind
3274908 Grant et al. Sep 1966 A
3650185 Takata Mar 1972 A
3718170 Caron et al. Feb 1973 A
3724342 Caron et al. Apr 1973 A
3817645 Trainor et al. Jun 1974 A
3822957 Caron et al. Jul 1974 A
3922106 Caron et al. Nov 1975 A
3970445 Gale et al. Jul 1976 A
4011051 Helton et al. Mar 1977 A
4066375 Caron et al. Jan 1978 A
4101318 Rudy Jul 1978 A
4530620 McCartney Jul 1985 A
4667543 Tsugaki et al. May 1987 A
4693293 Yamamoto et al. Sep 1987 A
4750792 Caron et al. Jun 1988 A
4865400 Caron et al. Sep 1989 A
4919566 Caron et al. Apr 1990 A
4953612 Sare et al. Sep 1990 A
4991662 Caron et al. Feb 1991 A
H946 Lonn Aug 1991 H
5101879 Beck et al. Apr 1992 A
5217321 Corcoran et al. Jun 1993 A
5217322 Corcoran et al. Jun 1993 A
D379630 Brockway Jun 1997 S
5687799 Greenfield et al. Nov 1997 A
5743033 Gegel Apr 1998 A
5967242 Caron et al. Oct 1999 A
6066407 Getz May 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0824168 Feb 1998 EP
59-218255 Dec 1984 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Caron Compactor Company, General Product Guide, Bulletin No. FL-06-96, pp. 1-9, Modesto, California, Jun., 1996.
OY Tanacorp Ltd., Tana Roller Compaction, F-Series Guide, 16 pages, Vaajakoski, Finland, Mar., 1998.
Finning Cat, Your Partners in Waste, Product Guide, pp. 1-16, Aberdeen, Scotland, undated.
Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar Landfill Compactor Tip for Traction Applications, PEHP5049, 1 page, 1996.
Caterpillar, Inc., Parts Competitive Bulletin, Caterpillar Parts Information, Caterpillar® Compactor Plus Tip vs. Caron Tips, 1 page, Apr. 1996.
Caron Compactor Company, Product Comparison—Maximizer™ vs. Super Duty Oin-On, Product Guide, 1 page, undated.
Compactor Wheel Technology Limited, Driving Ahead into the 90's, Product Guide, 4 pages, Sheffield, Great Britain, undated.
Terra Compactor Wheel Corp., Product Guide—Terrain-Adaptive High Density Wheels, 8 pages, undated.