Vertical semiconductor devices including superlattice punch through stop layer and related methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9972685
  • Patent Number
    9,972,685
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 3, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 15, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A semiconductor device may include a substrate, and a plurality of fins spaced apart on the substrate. Each of the fins may include a lower semiconductor fin portion extending vertically upward from the substrate, and at least one superlattice punch-through layer on the lower fin portion. The superlattice punch-through layer may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through layer comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. Each fin may also include an upper semiconductor fin portion on the at least one superlattice punch-through layer and extending vertically upward therefrom. The semiconductor device may also include source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins, and a gate overlying the fins.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of semiconductors, and, more particularly, to semiconductor devices comprising superlattices and associated methods.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Structures and techniques have been proposed to enhance the performance of semiconductor devices, such as by enhancing the mobility of the charge carriers. For example, U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0057416 to Currie et al. discloses strained material layers of silicon, silicon-germanium, and relaxed silicon and also including impurity-free zones that would otherwise cause performance degradation. The resulting biaxial strain in the upper silicon layer alters the carrier mobilities enabling higher speed and/or lower power devices. Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2003/0034529 to Fitzgerald et al. discloses a CMOS inverter also based upon similar strained silicon technology.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,685 B2 to Takagi discloses a semiconductor device including a silicon and carbon layer sandwiched between silicon layers so that the conduction band and valence band of the second silicon layer receive a tensile strain. Electrons having a smaller effective mass, and which have been induced by an electric field applied to the gate electrode, are confined in the second silicon layer, thus, an n-channel MOSFET is asserted to have a higher mobility.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,204 to Ishibashi et al. discloses a superlattice in which a plurality of layers, less than eight monolayers, and containing a fractional or binary or a binary compound semiconductor layer, are alternately and epitaxially grown. The direction of main current flow is perpendicular to the layers of the superlattice.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,357,119 to Wang et al. discloses a Si—Ge short period superlattice with higher mobility achieved by reducing alloy scattering in the superlattice. Along these lines, U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,934 to Candelaria discloses an enhanced mobility MOSFET including a channel layer comprising an alloy of silicon and a second material substitutionally present in the silicon lattice at a percentage that places the channel layer under tensile stress.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,216,262 to Tsu discloses a quantum well structure comprising two barrier regions and a thin epitaxially grown semiconductor layer sandwiched between the barriers. Each barrier region consists of alternate layers of SiO2/Si with a thickness generally in a range of two to six monolayers. A much thicker section of silicon is sandwiched between the barriers.


An article entitled “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” also to Tsu and published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402 discloses a semiconductor-atomic superlattice (SAS) of silicon and oxygen. The Si/O superlattice is disclosed as useful in a silicon quantum and light-emitting devices. In particular, a green electromuminescence diode structure was constructed and tested. Current flow in the diode structure is vertical, that is, perpendicular to the layers of the SAS. The disclosed SAS may include semiconductor layers separated by adsorbed species such as oxygen atoms, and CO molecules. The silicon growth beyond the adsorbed monolayer of oxygen is described as epitaxial with a fairly low defect density. One SAS structure included a 1.1 nm thick silicon portion that is about eight atomic layers of silicon, and another structure had twice this thickness of silicon. An article to Luo et al. entitled “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon” published in Physical Review Letters, Vol. 89, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 2002) further discusses the light emitting SAS structures of Tsu.


Published International Application WO 02/103,767 A1 to Wang, Tsu and Lofgren, discloses a barrier building block of thin silicon and oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous, antimony, arsenic or hydrogen to thereby reduce current flowing vertically through the lattice more than four orders of magnitude. The insulating layer/barrier layer allows for low defect epitaxial silicon to be deposited next to the insulating layer.


Published Great Britain Patent Application 2,347,520 to Mears et al. discloses that principles of Aperiodic Photonic Band-Gap (APBG) structures may be adapted for electronic bandgap engineering. In particular, the application discloses that material parameters, for example, the location of band minima, effective mass, etc, can be tailored to yield new aperiodic materials with desirable band-structure characteristics. Other parameters, such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and dielectric permittivity or magnetic permeability are disclosed as also possible to be designed into the material.


Despite the advantages provided by such structures, further developments may be desirable for integrating advanced semiconductor materials in various semiconductor devices.


SUMMARY

A method for making a semiconductor device may include forming a plurality of fins on a substrate. The fins may be formed by forming a plurality of spaced apart lower semiconductor fin portions extending vertically upward from the substrate, and forming at least one respective superlattice punch-through stop layer on each of the lower fin portions. Each superlattice punch-through stop layer may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through stop layer comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. A respective upper semiconductor fin portion may be formed above each of the at least one superlattice punch-through stop layers and extending vertically upward therefrom. The method may also include forming source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins, and forming a gate overlying the fins.


More particularly, forming the at least one respective superlattice punch-through stop layer may include forming a respective plurality of vertically stacked superlattice punch-through stop layers on each of the lower fin portions with a respective semiconductor layer between each of the superlattice punch-through stop layers. The method may also include forming an insulating layer on the substrate surrounding the lower semiconductor fin portions.


By way of example, forming the plurality of fins may further include forming a superlattice layer on the substrate, epitaxially growing a bulk semiconductor layer on the superlattice layer, and etching a plurality of spaced apart trenches extending through the bulk semiconductor layer, the superlattice layer, and into the substrate to define the respective lower semiconductor fin portions, superlattice punch-through stop layers, and upper semiconductor fin portions. The method may further include performing a thermal anneal after forming the plurality of fins.


Each base semiconductor portion may comprise silicon, germanium, etc. The at least one non-semiconductor monolayer may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, and carbon-oxygen, for example. Furthermore, the gate may include an oxide layer overlying the superlattice channel and a gate electrode overlying the oxide layer. Moreover, at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions may be chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor layer therebetween.


A related semiconductor device may include a substrate, and a plurality of fins spaced apart on the substrate. Each of the fins may include a lower semiconductor fin portion extending vertically upward from the substrate, and at least one superlattice punch-through stop layer on the lower fin portion. The superlattice punch-through stop layer may include a plurality of stacked groups of layers, with each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through stop layer comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. Each fin may also include an upper semiconductor fin portion above the at least one superlattice punch-through stop layer and extending vertically upward therefrom. The semiconductor device may also include source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins, and a gate overlying the fins.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of a superlattice for use in a semiconductor device in accordance with the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a perspective schematic atomic diagram of a portion of the superlattice shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged schematic cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a superlattice in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 4A is a graph of the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4B is a graph of the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 4C is a graph of the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z points for both bulk silicon as in the prior art, and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O superlattice as shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a top plan view of a semiconductor device in accordance with an example embodiment including superlattice punch through stop layers.



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the semiconductor device of FIG. 5 taken along the line A-A′.



FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of another example semiconductor device similar to that of FIG. 5 and taken along the line B-B′.



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of yet another semiconductor device similar to that of FIG. 5 and taken along the line A-A′.



FIG. 9a is a flow diagram illustrating a method for making a semiconductor device similar to that of FIG. 5.



FIGS. 9b(i)-9b(iv) are a series of cross-sectional diagrams corresponding to the method steps illustrated in FIG. 9a.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.


The present invention relates to controlling the properties of semiconductor materials at the atomic or molecular level. Further, the invention relates to the identification, creation, and use of improved materials for use in semiconductor devices.


Applicants theorize, without wishing to be bound thereto, that certain superlattices as described herein reduce the effective mass of charge carriers and that this thereby leads to higher charge carrier mobility. Effective mass is described with various definitions in the literature. As a measure of the improvement in effective mass Applicants use a “conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor”, Me−1 and Mh−1 for electrons and holes respectively, defined as:








M

e
,

i





j



-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=





E
>

E
F












B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i




(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j






f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E








d
3


k







E
>

E
F












B
.
Z
.





f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)








d
3


k









for electrons and:








M

h
,

i





j



-
1




(


E
F

,
T

)


=


-




E
<

E
F












B
.
Z
.






(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

i




(



k



E


(

k
,
n

)



)

j






f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)





E








d
3


k








E
<

E
F












B
.
Z
.





(

1
-

f


(


E


(

k
,
n

)


,

E
F

,
T

)



)







d
3


k









for holes, where f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, EF is the Fermi energy, T is the temperature, E(k,n) is the energy of an electron in the state corresponding to wave vector k and the nth energy band, the indices i and j refer to Cartesian coordinates x, y and z, the integrals are taken over the Brillouin zone (B.Z.), and the summations are taken over bands with energies above and below the Fermi energy for electrons and holes respectively.


Applicants' definition of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor is such that a tensorial component of the conductivity of the material is greater for greater values of the corresponding component of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor. Again Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that the superlattices described herein set the values of the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor so as to enhance the conductive properties of the material, such as typically for a preferred direction of charge carrier transport. The inverse of the appropriate tensor element is referred to as the conductivity effective mass. In other words, to characterize semiconductor material structures, the conductivity effective mass for electrons/holes as described above and calculated in the direction of intended carrier transport is used to distinguish improved materials.


Applicants have identified improved materials or structures for use in semiconductor devices. More specifically, the Applicants have identified materials or structures having energy band structures for which the appropriate conductivity effective masses for electrons and/or holes are substantially less than the corresponding values for silicon. In addition to the enhanced mobility characteristics of these structures, they may also be formed or used in such a manner that they provide piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and/or ferroelectric properties that are advantageous for use in a variety of different types of devices, as will be discussed further below.


Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, the materials or structures are in the form of a superlattice 25 whose structure is controlled at the atomic or molecular level and may be formed using known techniques of atomic or molecular layer deposition. The superlattice 25 includes a plurality of layer groups 45a-45n arranged in stacked relation, as perhaps best understood with specific reference to the schematic cross-sectional view of FIG. 1.


Each group of layers 45a-45n of the superlattice 25 illustratively includes a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers 46 defining a respective base semiconductor portion 46a-46n and an energy band-modifying layer 50 thereon. The energy band-modifying layers 50 are indicated by stippling in FIG. 1 for clarity of illustration.


The energy band-modifying layer 50 illustratively includes one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions. By “constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions” it is meant that at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions 46a-46n are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor monolayer 50 therebetween, as seen in FIG. 2. Generally speaking, this configuration is made possible by controlling the amount of non-semiconductor material that is deposited on semiconductor portions 46a-46n through atomic layer deposition techniques so that not all (i.e., less than full or 100% coverage) of the available semiconductor bonding sites are populated with bonds to non-semiconductor atoms, as will be discussed further below. Thus, as further monolayers 46 of semiconductor material are deposited on or over a non-semiconductor monolayer 50, the newly deposited semiconductor atoms will populate the remaining vacant bonding sites of the semiconductor atoms below the non-semiconductor monolayer.


In other embodiments, more than one such non-semiconductor monolayer may be possible. It should be noted that reference herein to a non-semiconductor or semiconductor monolayer means that the material used for the monolayer would be a non-semiconductor or semiconductor if formed in bulk. That is, a single monolayer of a material, such as silicon, may not necessarily exhibit the same properties that it would if formed in bulk or in a relatively thick layer, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that energy band-modifying layers 50 and adjacent base semiconductor portions 46a-46n cause the superlattice 25 to have a lower appropriate conductivity effective mass for the charge carriers in the parallel layer direction than would otherwise be present. Considered another way, this parallel direction is orthogonal to the stacking direction. The band modifying layers 50 may also cause the superlattice 25 to have a common energy band structure, while also advantageously functioning as an insulator between layers or regions vertically above and below the superlattice.


Moreover, this superlattice structure may also advantageously act as a barrier to dopant and/or material diffusion between layers vertically above and below the superlattice 25. These properties may thus advantageously allow the superlattice 25 to provide an interface for high-K dielectrics which not only reduces diffusion of the high-K material into the channel region, but which may also advantageously reduce unwanted scattering effects and improve device mobility, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is also theorized that semiconductor devices including the superlattice 25 may enjoy a higher charge carrier mobility based upon the lower conductivity effective mass than would otherwise be present. In some embodiments, and as a result of the band engineering achieved by the present invention, the superlattice 25 may further have a substantially direct energy bandgap that may be particularly advantageous for opto-electronic devices, for example.


The superlattice 25 also illustratively includes a cap layer 52 on an upper layer group 45n. The cap layer 52 may comprise a plurality of base semiconductor monolayers 46. The cap layer 52 may have between 2 to 100 monolayers of the base semiconductor, and, more preferably between 10 to 50 monolayers.


Each base semiconductor portion 46a-46n may comprise a base semiconductor selected from the group consisting of Group IV semiconductors, Group III-V semiconductors, and Group II-VI semiconductors. Of course, the term Group IV semiconductors also includes Group IV-IV semiconductors, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example.


Each energy band-modifying layer 50 may comprise a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, carbon and carbon-oxygen, for example. The non-semiconductor is also desirably thermally stable through deposition of a next layer to thereby facilitate manufacturing. In other embodiments, the non-semiconductor may be another inorganic or organic element or compound that is compatible with the given semiconductor processing as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. More particularly, the base semiconductor may comprise at least one of silicon and germanium, for example


It should be noted that the term monolayer is meant to include a single atomic layer and also a single molecular layer. It is also noted that the energy band-modifying layer 50 provided by a single monolayer is also meant to include a monolayer wherein not all of the possible sites are occupied (i.e., there is less than full or 100% coverage). For example, with particular reference to the atomic diagram of FIG. 2, a 4/1 repeating structure is illustrated for silicon as the base semiconductor material, and oxygen as the energy band-modifying material. Only half of the possible sites for oxygen are occupied in the illustrated example.


In other embodiments and/or with different materials this one-half occupation would not necessarily be the case as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Indeed it can be seen even in this schematic diagram, that individual atoms of oxygen in a given monolayer are not precisely aligned along a flat plane as will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art of atomic deposition. By way of example, a preferred occupation range is from about one-eighth to one-half of the possible oxygen sites being full, although other numbers may be used in certain embodiments.


Silicon and oxygen are currently widely used in conventional semiconductor processing, and, hence, manufacturers will be readily able to use these materials as described herein. Atomic or monolayer deposition is also now widely used. Accordingly, semiconductor devices incorporating the superlattice 25 in accordance with the invention may be readily adopted and implemented, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


It is theorized without Applicants wishing to be bound thereto that for a superlattice, such as the Si/O superlattice, for example, that the number of silicon monolayers should desirably be seven or less so that the energy band of the superlattice is common or relatively uniform throughout to achieve the desired advantages. The 4/1 repeating structure shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, for Si/O has been modeled to indicate an enhanced mobility for electrons and holes in the X direction. For example, the calculated conductivity effective mass for electrons (isotropic for bulk silicon) is 0.26 and for the 4/1 SiO superlattice in the X direction it is 0.12 resulting in a ratio of 0.46. Similarly, the calculation for holes yields values of 0.36 for bulk silicon and 0.16 for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice resulting in a ratio of 0.44.


While such a directionally preferential feature may be desired in certain semiconductor devices, other devices may benefit from a more uniform increase in mobility in any direction parallel to the groups of layers. It may also be beneficial to have an increased mobility for both electrons or holes, or just one of these types of charge carriers as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


The lower conductivity effective mass for the 4/1 Si/O embodiment of the superlattice 25 may be less than two-thirds the conductivity effective mass than would otherwise occur, and this applies for both electrons and holes. Of course, the superlattice 25 may further comprise at least one type of conductivity dopant therein, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


Indeed, referring now additionally to FIG. 3, another embodiment of a superlattice 25′ in accordance with the invention having different properties is now described. In this embodiment, a repeating pattern of 3/1/5/1 is illustrated. More particularly, the lowest base semiconductor portion 46a′ has three monolayers, and the second lowest base semiconductor portion 46b′ has five monolayers. This pattern repeats throughout the superlattice 25′. The energy band-modifying layers 50′ may each include a single monolayer. For such a superlattice 25′ including Si/O, the enhancement of charge carrier mobility is independent of orientation in the plane of the layers. Those other elements of FIG. 3 not specifically mentioned are similar to those discussed above with reference to FIG. 1 and need no further discussion herein.


In some device embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions of a superlattice may be a same number of monolayers thick. In other embodiments, at least some of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick. In still other embodiments, all of the base semiconductor portions may be a different number of monolayers thick.


In FIGS. 4A-4C, band structures calculated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) are presented. It is well known in the art that DFT underestimates the absolute value of the bandgap. Hence all bands above the gap may be shifted by an appropriate “scissors correction.” However the shape of the band is known to be much more reliable. The vertical energy axes should be interpreted in this light.



FIG. 4A shows the calculated band structure from the gamma point (G) for both bulk silicon (represented by continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 shown in FIG. 1 (represented by dotted lines). The directions refer to the unit cell of the 4/1 Si/O structure and not to the conventional unit cell of Si, although the (001) direction in the figure does correspond to the (001) direction of the conventional unit cell of Si, and, hence, shows the expected location of the Si conduction band minimum. The (100) and (010) directions in the figure correspond to the (110) and (−110) directions of the conventional Si unit cell. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the bands of Si on the figure are folded to represent them on the appropriate reciprocal lattice directions for the 4/1 Si/O structure.


It can be seen that the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure is located at the gamma point in contrast to bulk silicon (Si), whereas the valence band minimum occurs at the edge of the Brillouin zone in the (001) direction which we refer to as the Z point. One may also note the greater curvature of the conduction band minimum for the 4/1 Si/O structure compared to the curvature of the conduction band minimum for Si owing to the band splitting due to the perturbation introduced by the additional oxygen layer.



FIG. 4B shows the calculated band structure from the Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 4/1 Si/O superlattice 25 (dotted lines). This figure illustrates the enhanced curvature of the valence band in the (100) direction.



FIG. 4C shows the calculated band structure from both the gamma and Z point for both bulk silicon (continuous lines) and for the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure of the superlattice 25′ of FIG. 3 (dotted lines). Due to the symmetry of the 5/1/3/1 Si/O structure, the calculated band structures in the (100) and (010) directions are equivalent. Thus the conductivity effective mass and mobility are expected to be isotropic in the plane parallel to the layers, i.e. perpendicular to the (001) stacking direction. Note that in the 5/1/3/1 Si/O example the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum are both at or close to the Z point.


Although increased curvature is an indication of reduced effective mass, the appropriate comparison and discrimination may be made via the conductivity reciprocal effective mass tensor calculation. This leads Applicants to further theorize that the 5/1/3/1 superlattice 25′ should be substantially direct bandgap. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the appropriate matrix element for optical transition is another indicator of the distinction between direct and indirect bandgap behavior.


Using the above-described measures, one can select materials having improved band structures for specific purposes. Referring more particularly to FIGS. 5 and 6, a first example would be a superlattice material layer 125 in a vertical semiconductor device 100, such as a FINFET, in which the superlattice material layer is used for dopant blocking within each semiconductor fin 104. More particularly, it may generally be desirable to dope a bottom portion 105 of a fin 104 to help reduce leakage (a P-type dopant is used in the illustrated NMOS embodiment, but an N-type dopant may be used for a PMOS device, as will be discussed further below). However, it may also be desirable to have an upper channel portion 106 of the fin 104 remain undoped, but it may be difficult to prevent dopant creep from the bottom of the fin 105 into the upper channel portion of the fin. The superlattice layer 125 may advantageously provide a self-aligned punch-through stop layer for preventing dopant from the lower portion 105 of the fin 104 from creeping into the upper undoped portion 106 of the fin, in addition to the leakage reduction properties of the superlattice itself, as described above. The upper (undoped) portion 106 of each fin 104 may advantageously be epitaxially grown on top of a respective superlattice layer 125, as also described above.


The fins 104 are formed on a substrate 107 (e.g., silicon substrate), and a source and drain regions 109, 110 are formed at opposing ends of the fins 104 (see FIG. 5). An insulating layer 108 (e.g., SiO2) is formed over the fins 104 and source and drain regions 109, 110. Moreover, a gate 111 is formed overlying the fins 104 and the insulating layer 108.


A second related example embodiment is shown in FIG. 7, in which a vertical device 100′ includes a “quasi-BOX” structure below the upper channel portion 106′, in which a series of vertically spaced-apart superlattice layers 125′ have regions or layers 112′, 113′ of a bulk semiconductor (e.g., Si) stacked therebetween and with alternating dopant types. In the illustrated example, the stack includes a bottom superlattice layer 125′ on the Si substrate 107′, an N-type Si layer 112′ on the bottom superlattice layer, an intermediate superlattice layer on the N-type Si layer, a P-type Si layer 113′ on the intermediate superlattice layer, and an upper superlattice layer on the P-type Si layer. The Si channel 106′ may advantageously be grown on top of the upper superlattice layer 125′, as noted above. However, in some embodiments the channel may reside partially or completely in the upper superlattice layer 125′, if desired. This quasi-BOX structure may conceptually be considered to perform a similar function to a buried oxide (BOX) layer, but here the quasi-BOX stack provides an added benefit of an embedded P-N junction to provide further isolation of the channel region, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.


In accordance with a third example as described with reference to FIG. 8, a “quasi-planar” semiconductor device 100″ is similar to the FINFET embodiment described above with respect to FIG. 6, but with a shorter and wider profile for the fins. This embodiment may be advantageous in certain implementations, as it may help relax fin patterning requirements, for example.


An example method for making a CMOS version of the semiconductor device 100 will now be described with reference to FIGS. 9a and 9b. Beginning at Block 201, a blanket superlattice layer 125 may be formed on a silicon substrate 107, followed by an epitaxial silicon growth above the superlattice layer (FIG. 9b, (i)). Deep punch-through stop implants (e.g., N-type for PMOS, P-type for NMOS) may then be performed at Block 202 (FIG. 9b, (ii)), followed by a fin 104 patterning/isolation processing module, at Block 203 (FIG. 9b, (iii)). Gate 111 and source/drain 109, 110 processing may then be performed using typical steps for FINFET processing, for example, at Blocks 204-205 (FIG. 9b, (iv)).


Many modifications and other embodiments will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that the invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device comprising: a substrate;a plurality of fins spaced apart on said substrate, each of said fins comprising a lower semiconductor fin portion extending vertically upward from the substrate,a plurality of spaced apart superlattice punch-through stop layers on the lower fin portion, each superlattice punch-through stop layer including a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through stop layer comprising a plurality of stacked base semiconductor monolayers defining a base semiconductor portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base semiconductor portions,a respective bulk semiconductor layer between adjacent superlattice punch-through stop layers, andan upper semiconductor fin portion on an uppermost one of said superlattice punch-through stop layers and extending vertically upward therefrom;source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins; anda gate overlying the fins.
  • 2. The semiconductor device of claim 1 further comprising an insulating layer on the substrate surrounding the lower semiconductor fin portions.
  • 3. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein each base semiconductor portion comprises silicon.
  • 4. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein each base semiconductor portion comprises germanium.
  • 5. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein the at least one non-semiconductor layer comprises oxygen.
  • 6. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein the at least one non-semiconductor monolayer comprises a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, and carbon-oxygen.
  • 7. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein the gate comprises an oxide layer overlying the superlattice channel and a gate electrode overlying the oxide layer.
  • 8. The semiconductor device of claim 1 wherein at least some semiconductor atoms from opposing base semiconductor portions are chemically bound together through the non-semiconductor layer therebetween.
  • 9. A semiconductor device comprising: a substrate;a plurality of fins spaced apart on said substrate, each of said fins comprising a lower semiconductor fin portion extending vertically upward from the substrate,a plurality of spaced apart superlattice punch-through stop layers on the lower fin portion, each superlattice punch-through stop layer including a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through stop layer comprising a plurality of stacked base silicon monolayers defining a base silicon portion and at least one oxygen monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base silicon portions,a respective bulk semiconductor layer between adjacent superlattice punch-through stop layers, andan upper semiconductor fin portion on an uppermost one of said superlattice punch-through stop layers and extending vertically upward therefrom;source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins; anda gate overlying the fins.
  • 10. The semiconductor device of claim 9 further comprising an insulating layer on the substrate surrounding the lower semiconductor fin portions.
  • 11. A semiconductor device comprising: a substrate;a plurality of fins spaced apart on said substrate, each of said fins comprising a lower semiconductor fin portion extending vertically upward from the substrate,a plurality of spaced apart superlattice punch-through stop layers on the lower fin portion, each superlattice punch-through stop layer including a plurality of stacked groups of layers, each group of layers of the superlattice punch-through stop layer comprising a plurality of stacked base germanium monolayers defining a base germanium portion and at least one non-semiconductor monolayer constrained within a crystal lattice of adjacent base germanium portions, with the at least one non-semiconductor monolayer comprising a non-semiconductor selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, fluorine, and carbon-oxygen,a respective bulk semiconductor layer between adjacent superlattice punch-through stop layers, andan upper semiconductor fin portion on an uppermost one of said superlattice punch-through stop layers and extending vertically upward therefrom;source and drain regions at opposing ends of the fins; anda gate overlying the fins.
  • 12. The semiconductor device of claim 11 further comprising an insulating layer on the substrate surrounding the lower semiconductor fin portions.
US Referenced Citations (149)
Number Name Date Kind
4485128 Dalal et al. Nov 1984 A
4590399 Roxlo et al. May 1986 A
4594603 Holonyak, Jr. Jun 1986 A
4882609 Schubert et al. Nov 1989 A
4908678 Yamazaki Mar 1990 A
4937204 Ishibashi et al. Jun 1990 A
4969031 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1990 A
5055887 Yamazaki Oct 1991 A
5081513 Jackson et al. Jan 1992 A
5216262 Tsu Jun 1993 A
5357119 Wang et al. Oct 1994 A
5577061 Hasenberg et al. Nov 1996 A
5594567 Akiyama et al. Jan 1997 A
5606177 Wallace et al. Feb 1997 A
5616515 Okuno Apr 1997 A
5627386 Harvey et al. May 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5684817 Houdre et al. Nov 1997 A
5994164 Fonash et al. Nov 1999 A
6058127 Joannopoulos et al. May 2000 A
6255150 Wilk et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274007 Smirnov et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281518 Sato Aug 2001 B1
6281532 Doyle et al. Aug 2001 B1
6326311 Euda et al. Dec 2001 B1
6344271 Yadav et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350993 Chu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6376337 Wang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6436784 Allam Aug 2002 B1
6472685 Takagi Oct 2002 B2
6498359 Schmidt et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501092 Nikonov et al. Dec 2002 B1
6521519 Kamath et al. Feb 2003 B2
6521549 Kamath et al. Feb 2003 B1
6566679 Nikonov et al. May 2003 B2
6608327 Davis et al. Aug 2003 B1
6621097 Nikonov et al. Sep 2003 B2
6638838 Eisenbeiser et al. Oct 2003 B1
6646293 Emrick et al. Nov 2003 B2
6673646 Droopad Jan 2004 B2
6690699 Capasso et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711191 Kozaki et al. Mar 2004 B1
6741624 Mears et al. May 2004 B2
6748002 Shveykin Jun 2004 B2
6816530 Capasso et al. Nov 2004 B2
6830964 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6833294 Mears et al. Dec 2004 B1
6860964 Park Mar 2005 B2
6878576 Mears et al. Apr 2005 B1
6891188 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6897472 Mears et al. May 2005 B2
6927413 Mears et al. Aug 2005 B2
6952018 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958486 Mears et al. Oct 2005 B2
6993222 Mears et al. Jan 2006 B2
7018900 Krepps Mar 2006 B2
7033437 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034329 Mears et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045377 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7045813 Mears et al. May 2006 B2
7071119 Mears et al. Jul 2006 B2
7109052 Mears et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123792 Mears et al. Oct 2006 B1
7153763 Hytha et al. Dec 2006 B2
7202494 Blanchard et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227174 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7229902 Mears et al. Jun 2007 B2
7265002 Mears et al. Sep 2007 B2
7279699 Mears et al. Oct 2007 B2
7279701 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7288457 Kreps Oct 2007 B2
7303948 Mears et al. Dec 2007 B2
7432524 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7435988 Mears et al. Oct 2008 B2
7436026 Kreps Oct 2008 B2
7446002 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7446334 Mears et al. Nov 2008 B2
7491587 Rao Feb 2009 B2
7514328 Rao Apr 2009 B2
7517702 Halilov et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531828 Mears et al. May 2009 B2
7531829 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7531850 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7535041 Blanchard May 2009 B2
7586116 Kreps et al. Sep 2009 B2
7586165 Blanchard Sep 2009 B2
7598515 Mears et al. Oct 2009 B2
7612366 Mears et al. Nov 2009 B2
7625767 Huang et al. Dec 2009 B2
7659539 Kreps et al. Feb 2010 B2
7700447 Dukovski et al. Apr 2010 B2
7718996 Dukovski et al. May 2010 B2
7781827 Rao Aug 2010 B2
7812339 Mears et al. Oct 2010 B2
7863066 Mears et al. Jan 2011 B2
7880161 Mears et al. Feb 2011 B2
7928425 Rao Apr 2011 B2
8389974 Mears et al. Mar 2013 B2
8497171 Wu et al. Jul 2013 B1
8994002 Lee Mar 2015 B2
20020094003 Bour et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030034529 Fitzgerald et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057416 Currie et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030089899 Lieber et al. May 2003 A1
20030162335 Yuki et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030215990 Fitzgerald et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040084781 Ahn et al. May 2004 A1
20040227165 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040262594 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262597 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266045 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266046 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266116 Mears et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050029510 Mears et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050032247 Mears et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050163692 Atanackovic Jul 2005 A1
20050208715 Seo et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050279991 Mears et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050282330 Mears et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060011905 Mears et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060220118 Stephenson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060223215 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060226502 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060231857 Blanchard Oct 2006 A1
20060243964 Kreps et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263980 Kreps et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060267130 Rao Nov 2006 A1
20060273299 Stephenson et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060289049 Rao Dec 2006 A1
20060292765 Blanchard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070010040 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070012910 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070015344 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020833 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070020860 Mears et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070063185 Rao Mar 2007 A1
20070063186 Rao Mar 2007 A1
20070158640 Halilov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166928 Halilov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070187667 Halilov et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080012004 Huang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090072276 Inaba Mar 2009 A1
20090267155 Izumida et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100270535 Halilov et al. Oct 2010 A1
20110215299 Rao Sep 2011 A1
20120261716 Yanagihara Oct 2012 A1
20130240836 Lee et al. Sep 2013 A1
20150144877 Mears et al. May 2015 A1
20150144878 Mears et al. May 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
0843361 May 1998 EP
2347520 Jun 2000 GB
61027681 Feb 1986 JP
61145820 Jul 1986 JP
61220339 Sep 1986 JP
62219665 Sep 1987 JP
9629728 Sep 1996 WO
9963580 Dec 1999 WO
02103767 Dec 2002 WO
2005034245 Apr 2005 WO
2005034325 Apr 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Tsu “Phenomena in silicon nanostructure devices” published online Sep. 6, 2000 by Applied Physics and Materials Science & Processing, pp. 391-402. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Luo et al., “Chemical Design of Direct-Gap Light-Emitting Silicon”, published in Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, No. 7, Aug. 2002, 4 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Raphael Tsu “Si Based Green ELD: Si-Oxygen Superlattice” wysiwyg://l/http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/72512946/start: published online Jul. 21, 2000; 2 pgs. Abstract Only. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Ye et al., GaAs MOSFET with Oxide Gate Dielectric Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition, Agere Systems, Mar. 2003; 7 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Novikov et al., Silicon-based Optoelectronics, 1999-2003, pp. 1-6 See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Fan et al., N- and P-Type SiGe/Si Superlattice Coolers, the Seventeenth Intersociety Conference on Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm 2000), vol. 1, pp. 304-307, Las Vegas, NV, May 2000; 4 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Shah et al, Experimental Analysis and Theoretical Model for Anomalously High Ideality Factors (n>2.0) in AlGaN/GaN P-N Junction Diodes, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, No. 4, Aug. 15, 2003; 4 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Ball, Striped Nanowires Shrink Electronics, news@nature.com, Feb. 7, 2002; 2 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Fiory et al., Light Emission from Silicon: Some Perspectives and Applications, Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 32, No. 10, 2003; pp. 1043-1051. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Lecture 6: Light Emitting and Detecting Devices, MSE 6001, Semiconductor Materials Lectures, Fall 2004; 4 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Harvard University Professor and Nanosys Co-Founder, Charlie Lieber, Raises the Stakes in the Development of Nanoscale Superlattice Structures and Nanodevices, Feb. 8, 2002, Nanosys, Inc.; 2 pgs. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Bu, “FINFET Technology, a substrate prospective”, IBM Research, PreT0 Alliance, SOI Conference, 2011, pp. 1-28. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Xu et al., “MOSFET performance and scalability enhancement by insertion of oxygen layers”, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, 2012, pp. 1-4. See Priority U.S. Appl. No. 14/550,244, filed Nov. 21, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160099317 A1 Apr 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61907598 Nov 2013 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14550244 Nov 2014 US
Child 14958447 US