Water-repellent coating and method for forming same on the surface of liquid jet

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6341836
  • Patent Number
    6,341,836
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 18, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 29, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A water-repellent coating having a higher wiping resistance against a wiper and capable of being formed by a more simplified process than was previously possible. The method of forming the water-repellent coating comprises a flat hard body and a plating-processed fluoric polymer which are formed on a nozzle plate having a nozzle as a substrate around the nozzle.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to compositions of water-repellent coatings on the surface of liquid jet nozzles and in particular a nozzle plate for an inkjet printer.




Among inkjet heads, those using a piezo-electric element have recently become more and more popular for their high energy-efficiency, etc. This kind of inkjet head typically comprises a piezo-electric element, one common ink chamber with ink supplied from outside and stored therein, a plurality of pressure chambers connected to the piezo-electric element and a nozzle plate connected to the pressure chambers so that a nozzle is connected to each pressure chamber. Each pressure chamber that is connected each corresponding ink feed path to the common ink chamber receives ink from the common ink chamber, increases an internal pressure by utilizing a deformation of the piezo-electric element, and thereby jets ink from the nozzle.




On the surface of the nozzle plate (opposite to the pressure chamber) a water-repellent coating is typically formed around the nozzle. The water-repellent coating has the following exemplary effects. First, the water-repellent coating serves to stabilize a flying direction of ink jetted from the nozzle. Without the water-repellent coating, onto the nozzle plate surface is adhered the ink spouted from the pressure chamber, the ink adhered onto the nozzle plate like this pulls the next ink jetted continuously, and thereby bends the flying direction of ink and prevents from flying straight in a desired direction. Secondly, the water-repellent coating serves to smooth a wiping process. After a printing operation is completed, the inkjet head usually undergoes a backup process that eliminates dirt from the nozzle. In the backup process, a suction pump contacts the nozzle and sucks out dirt therein, and at the same time the ink in the nozzle adheres onto the surface of the nozzle plate. Thus, the wiping process that a wiper such as rubber blade, etc. wipes ink on the nozzle surface follows. In that event, without the water-repellent coating, the ink adhered onto the nozzle plate surface after the backup process could not successfully be wiped out and would remain on the nozzle plate surface. Consequently, the subsequently flying direction of ink is bent and printing quality is adulterated with impure or diluted color if the remaining ink is different in color from the subsequently flying ink.




For the forgoing effects, it is inevitable for inkjet head to form the water-repellent coating. In addition, a conventional water-repellent coating has a fluoric polymer of high water repellency as a main ingredient.




However, the fluoric polymer is soft and less adhesive to a substrate, and thus is likely to flaw, abrasion or scratch (i.e. low wiping-resistant); therefore, its anticipated water repellency can not be continuously maintained. Accordingly, it has been desired to form a water-repellent coating that has a fluoric polymer as a main ingredient and is continuously usable about one hundred thousand times.




Conventionally, it has been suggested for example that a fluoric polymer is plated and a subsequent heating process melts the fluoric polymer adhered onto the plated surface, forms a coating and thereby improves its wiping resistance. This process, however, involves a problem that the coating, even if it is formed, is worn out shortly by a plural of frictions and its water repellency lowers. On the other hand, it has also been suggested to form a member around the liquid jet in concave shape and avoid the fluoric coating around the nozzle from scratched by a friction. The unleveling process, however, increases its person-hours and costs.




BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, it is a general object of the present invention to provide a novel and useful water-repellent coating and method of forming the water-repellent coating in which the above disadvantages are eliminated.




More specifically, it is an exemplified object of the present invention to provide a water-repellent coating that has higher wiping resistance relative to a wiper and is formed by a more simplified process than was previously possible, and a method of forming such a water-repellent coating.




In order to achieve the above object, a print head according to claim


1


comprises a nozzle plate having a nozzle which jets ink, and a water-repellent coating that is formed on the nozzle plate as a substrate around the nozzle and comprises a hard body and a fluoric polymer formed by a plating process. According to the print head claimed in claim


1


, water repellency of the fluoric polymer works against liquid like ink, etc. jetted from the nozzle, and the hard body enhances wiping resistance of the fluoric polymer.




A print head as set forth in claim


2


that depends upon claim


1


comprises a water-repellent coating including the hard body in a flat shape. Thus, according to the print head claimed in claim


2


, the hard body is less likely to fall off than a spherical shaped one and serves to maintain wiping resistance for a long time. A print head as set forth in claim


3


that depends upon claim


1


comprises a water-repellent coating including the hard body having a major axis of 1 μm or smaller in its particle diameter. According to the print head claimed in claim


3


, the hard body having a big particle diameter never prevents a nozzle plate surface from being smoothly wiped. A print head as set forth in claims


4


and


5


that depends upon claim


1


comprises a water-repellent coating having the hard body including a boron nitride boron nitride single crystal. Therefore, according to the print head claimed in claims


4


and


5


, the boron nitride or boron carbide single crystal intrinsically having the advantage of a flat shape requires no additional process to deform the hard body into a flat shape. A print head as set forth in claims


6


and


7


that depends upon claim


1


comprises a water-repellent coating employing an electrolytic or electroless plating process as the plating process. Accordingly, the print head claimed in claims


6


and


7


has the advantage of requiring no special plating process.




A recording device as set forth in claim


8


comprises a print head and a driving device which drives the print head wherein the print head includes a nozzle plate having a nozzle which jets ink and a water-repellent coating which is formed on the nozzle plate as a substrate around the nozzle and comprises a hard body and a fluoric polymer formed by a plating process. According to the recording device claimed in claim


8


, water repellency of the fluoric polymer works against liquid like ink, etc. jetted from the nozzle, and the hard body enhances wiping resistance of the fluoric polymer.




A method of forming a water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


9


comprises the steps of forming on a nozzle plate a first resist which is open only around a nozzle of the nozzle plate, forming a first layer of a plated fluoric polymer by a first plating process via the first resist, forming a second resist, adding a hard body to a first layer by a second plating process, and removing the first and second resists. According to the method of forming a water-repellent coating claimed in this claim, the hard body is allowed to protrude from the water-repellent coating surface because the water-repellent coating is formed on the nozzle plate as a substrate. A method claimed in claim


10


that depends on claim


9


further comprises the step of heating the water-repellent coating until its water repellency becomes enough to make a contact angle of ink containing 10% of alcohol 60 degrees or larger. By the heat treatment, the fluoric polymer melts and taking in the additive hard body.




Other objects and further features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic sectional view for explaining a composition of a water-repellent coating of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic sectional view illustrating a variation of the water-repellent coating shown in

FIG. 1

or a state after a predetermined period of use.





FIG. 3

is an enlarged view of a portion circled in a solid line in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is an aschematic sectional view for explaining a composition of a water-repellent coating having a spherical hard body relative to the water-repellent coating in

FIG. 1

having a flat hard body.





FIG. 5

is a schematic sectional view for explaining a state in which the spherical hard body in

FIG. 4

is fallen down.




FIG.


6


A-

FIG. 6E

are flow sectional diagrams for explaining one example of a method of forming the water-repellent coating shown in FIG.


1


.




FIG.


7


A-

FIG. 7E

are flow sectional diagrams for explaining another example of a method of forming the water-repellent coating shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 8

is an exploded perspective view of a completed inkjet head


300


.





FIG. 9

is a partially enlarged side view of an inkjet head


300


.





FIG. 10

is a perspective overview of a recording device according to the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Referring now to

FIGS. 1

to


3


inclusive, a description will be given of a water-repellent coating


100


according to the present invention.

FIG. 1

is a schematic sectional view for explaining a composition of a water-repellent coating


100


of the present invention.

FIG. 2

is a schematic sectional view of a water-repellent coating


100




a


showing an exemplified variation or a state after a predetermined period of use.

FIG. 3

is an enlarged view of a portion circled in a solid line in FIG.


2


. In each drawing, those elements designated by the same reference numeral denote the same elements, and a duplicate description thereof will be omitted. Those elements designated by the same reference numeral with a variety of alphabetical letters attached thereto denote the same kinds of elements but are distinguished from each other by alphabets and are comprehensively designated by simple reference numerals.




The water-repellent coatings


100


and


100




a


are, for example, 1 through 2 μm thick and are formed around a nozzle


12


on the surface of a nozzle plate


10


.

FIG. 1

is an enlarged sectional view around a nozzle (hole)


12


applicable to a print head


300


which will be described later (e.g. piezo-type inkjet head and a bubble jet-type inkjet head). The nozzle plate


10


comprises the nozzles


12


each having a straight portion


14


and a taper portion


16


, to the number corresponding to a predetermined resolution. The nozzle


12


does not necessarily include both of the straight portion


14


and the taper portion


16


but may include only one of them. A portion defined by the straight portion


14


is an opening portion


18


of the nozzle


12


where a meniscus


20


of ink is formed. The nozzle plate


10


is connected to a pressure chamber plate


30


, and the pressure chamber plate


30


is provided with an ink chamber as will be described later.




The water-repellent coatings


100


and


100




a


comprise a fluoroplastic coating


102


, a fluoroplastic particle


104


, a nickel base


106


and a flat hard body


108


. The water-repellent coating


100


shown in

FIG. 1

is different from the water-repellent coating


100




a


shown in

FIG. 2

in whether the flat hard body


108


is partially protruded from the fluoroplastic coating


102


.




The water-repellent coatings


100


and


100




a


are characteristically formed on the nozzle plate


10


as a substrate. Therefore, this invention does not adopt such a method, for example, that the water-repellent coating and the nozzle plate


10


are formed in this sequence on a plane and then the plane is removed. Because this method makes the hard body


108


unable to protrude from the fluoroplastic coating


102


as shown in

FIG. 2. A

projection structure of the hard body


108


as shown in

FIG. 2

is suitable for preventing the fluoroplastic coating


102


from being scratched by a friction of a wiping blade (wiper) and making it possible to maintain ink water repellency for a long period.




For the fluoroplastic coating


102


and the fluoroplastic particle


104


, tetrafluoroethylene resins, tetrafluoroethylene-hexafluoropropylene copolymerization resins, trifluoroethylene chloride resins, fluorovinylidene resins, fluorovinyl resins, PTFE, FEP, ETFE, PFA, PCTFE and PVDF are usable either singly or in the form of a mixture of two or more of them. Their average particle diameters should preferably be less than 150 μm and in particular ranging from 0.05 to 20 μm. In addition to the above fluoroplastic particles, as needed, other inorganic or organic precipitation polymer particulates may be formed together.




The nickel base


106


as a plating coating is added to improve adhesion. Other than nickel may be employed copper, silver, zinc, tin, cobalt and such nickel alloys as a nickel-cobalt alloy, a nickel-phosphorus alloy and a nickel-boron alloy, etc. The plating coating can be formed, for instance, by using the electrolytic plating solution or electroless plating solution in which PFA is suspended. The electrolytic plating solutions according to a variety of metal plating coatings to be deposited may be selected from an electrolytic nickel plating solution such as the Watts bath, a chloride-rich bath, a nickel sulfamate bath and a nickel borofluoride bath, etc.; an electrolytic cobalt plating solution such as a cobalt sulfate bath and a cobalt chloride bath, etc.; an electrolytic copper plating solution such as a copper sulfate bath and a copper borofluoride bath, etc.; an electrolytic lead/tin plating solution such as a lead sulfate bath, a tin sulfate bath and a lead borofluoride bath, etc. It is however preferable to employ a sulfamic acid bath having a sulfamic acid ion content of more than 0.5 mol, more desirably more than 0.8 mol especially in the light of their properties that form more precipitation and resist agitation. The electroless plating solutions may be selected from an electroless nickel plating solution, an electroless cobalt plating solution and an electroless copper plating solution, etc. using a boron compound such as a hypophosphate and a dimethyl borazon, etc. as a reducing agent.




The hard body


108


has a higher hardness than a fluoric polymer and a flat shape. The hard body


108


should preferably be as water-repellent, wiping-resistant and frictionless as possible. Even though the hard body


108


has low water repellency, a heat treatment as will be described later melts the fluoric polymer, covers the hard body


108


, and thereby maintains the water repellency. The hard body


108


is added so as to promote the wiping resistance of the fluoric polymer against the wiper. Its flat shape aims at enhancing an anchor effect into the plating coating. A more specific description is now given to the enhanced anchor effect. To illustrate, suppose that a spherical hard body


208


(e.g. having more than 1 μm in diameter) is dispersed in the water-repellent coating


200


(e.g. of about 1 μm in thickness), as shown in FIG.


4


. If the water-repellent coating


200


is wiped on its surface by a wiper


5


, the spherical hard body


208


other than having more than half of its diameter embedded in the water-repellent coating


200


is fallen down as shown in

FIG. 5

, so that the wiping resistance of the water-repellent coating lowers to such a level as that of the water-repellent coating having no hard body


208


. In

FIG. 5

, a mark left by the hard body


208


is indicated with


209


.




As the hard body


108


, are usable, for example, BN (boron nitride), boron carbide, silicon carbide, titanium carbide, tungsten carbide, graphite fluoride, alumina, glass and ceramics, etc. The boron nitride and boron carbide are suitable for the water-repellent coating of this invention in that they are dealt with in a single crystal and the single crystal is not spherical in crystal structure (the boron nitride is flat). Particularly, the boron nitride, which is used for reducing friction of a bearing, is suitable for improving sliding properties of the electroless nickel coating and increasing strength of the fluoroplastic coating


108


. When the alumina, glass, ceramics are used, they should be deformed in a flat shape. BN added for this is, for example, some 5 g/l or 10 g/l, preferably 20 g/l.




Since the additive hard body


108


is less water-repellent than the fluoric polymer, the water-repellent surface should be covered as widely with the fluoric polymer as possible. Therefore, it is necessary to increase a water-repellent portion of liquid contact surface by heating and melting the fluoric polymer after plated so as to taking in the additive.




Referring now to FIG.


6


A-

FIG. 6E

, a description will be given of a method of manufacturing a nozzle plate with a water-repellent coating as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. Hereupon, FIG.


6


A-

FIG. 6E

are flow sectional diagrams for explaining one exemplified method of the water-repellent coating


100


shown in

FIG. 1

or the water-repellent coating


100




a


shown in FIG.


2


. First, as shown in FIG.


6


(A), a nozzle plate substrate


10


of a stainless steel (SUS316) plate of 100 μm through 300 μm thickness is processed by stamping, etching, electrical discharge machining and laser machining, etc. and is provided with a nozzle


12


. To illustrate, assume that a conic nozzle


12


is made by stamping, a straight portion


14


being 40 μm thick and 20 μm length, and a taper portion


16


has a taper angle of 20 degrees. A nozzle plate surface


22


is roughly ground to remove burrs left by the processing but the burrs are not completely removed.




Next, as shown in FIG.


6


(B), corrosion-resistant polymer resin as a resist is filled in the processed nozzle


12


. A photosensitive liquid resist is usable as a resin member in contemplation of its subsequent removal and its machinability. This example utilizes a dry film resist (DFR)


24


of a curing acrylic resin. The DFR


24


becomes a viscid liquid by adding a sufficient heat and is easily filled in the nozzle


12


. Further, in terms of removal, water soluble DFR which may be easily removed with alkaline water solution is available.




As shown in FIG.


6


(C), the nozzle plate surface


22


is drenched in a stainless etching solution and etched. On the nozzle plate surface


22


there exist burrs left by the processing or rough grinding of the nozzle


12


, but can easily be removed by etching process. This makes it possible to omit a final finishing grinding step in processing the nozzle plate


10


, and enables a cost-reduction. In addition, a chemical grinding means, if used, may reduce a mechanical stress applied to the nozzle substrate


10


and may improve processing accuracy. The etching depth is 10 μm and the length of straight portion


14


is 10 μm.




Thereafter, a water washing, an electrolytic defatting, a water washing, an acid washing and a strike Ni plating are processed, and a water-repellent coating


100


is formed on the nozzle plate surface


22


with a Ni precipitation plating as shown in FIG.


6


(D). The water-repellent coating


100


has the thickness not exceeding the height of the protruded DFR


24


. Then, the nozzle plate


10


is drenched in an alkaline water solution, the DFR


24


is removed as shown in FIG.


6


(E), and the nozzle plate


10


with a water-repellent coating


100


becomes completed. When materials as having difficulty in being etched, such as ceramics, glass, etc. are used as the nozzle plate


10


, the grinding process (FIG.


6


(C)) may be substituted by a physical means using a sandblast. In that event, a sandblast-resistant DFR


24


that includes a polyurethane resin other than an acryl resin as usual ingredients (e.g. BF series made by Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.) may be employed. The physical grinding means is also applicable to a nozzle plate substrate


10


made of metal.




Like this, the water-repellent coating


100


on the nozzle plate surface


22


by Ni precipitation plating is formed along a projected portion of DFR


24


, preventing dropping into the nozzle


12


, and maintains the size accuracy of the nozzle


12


and the water-repellent coating


100


. For example, in

FIG. 1

, the water-repellent coating


100


is formed so that it permits dropping by making its diameter φ


2


within 3% range of the diameter φ


1


of an opening


18


. This 3% difference is for the purpose of arranging the opening of the water-repellent coating


100


and the opening


18


of the nozzle plate on almost the same side. This arrangement can prevent a deviation of ink dots, stabilize flying ink direction and provide high quality images.




Referring next to FIG.


7


A-

FIG. 7E

, a description will be given of another method of manufacturing the nozzle plate


10


having the water-repellent coating


100


. The process shown in FIG.


7


A-

FIG. 7E

, is a variation of the process of FIG.


6


(C) and those that follow, and it is to be construed that the process indicated in FIG.


7


(A) follows the process indicated in FIG.


6


(B). As shown in FIG.


7


(A), on the nozzle plate surface


22


is formed a liquid resist or a DFR coating


26


capable of alkaline development and removal, and then the exposure and development with a mask pattern eliminate coatings around the opening


18


on the nozzle plate surface


22


. Next, as shown in FIG.


7


(B), the nozzle plate substrate


10


is drenched in an etching solution and the surface of the opening the coating


26


is ground. The etching depth can be adjusted by altering etching conditions. By adjusting the depth, the length of the straight portion


14


and the projection amount of the DFR


24


are adjusted.




As shown in FIG.


7


(C), the coating


26


is removed with strong alkaline solution. In this case, the DFR


24


, which is an alkaline-resistant resist, is not eliminated and remains. After that, a water washing, an acid washing, an electrolytic defatting, a water washing and a strike Ni plating are processed. Subsequently, as shown in FIG.


7


(D), Ni precipitation plating is processed on the nozzle plate surface


22


and the water-repellent coating


100


is formed. The coating thickness is so adjusted as does not exceed the projection amount of the DFR


24


. Thereafter, as shown in FIG.


7


(E), the DFR


24


are removed and eliminated with solution development-type resist removal solution.




The above manufacturing method can also provide a nozzle plate


10


having an accurate sized water-repellent coating


100


, as in FIG.


6


. This method, particularly as using DFR


24


as a resist member, only necessitates a heating process where an exposure process may be omitted, and is applicable at one step from the back of the nozzle plate substrate


10


, whereby reducing manufacturing costs.




Description will be given of a method of manufacturing a water-repellent coating


100


shown in

FIG. 1

or a water-repellent coating


100




a


shown in FIG.


2


. First, in order to form a water-repellent plating coating only on the surface of the nozzle plate


10


, other portions are masked so as not to adhere the coating. In this step, the nozzle plate


10


as a substrate is laminated at the side on which a pressure chamber


30


is formed with an alkaline development-type dry film (this exemplified embodiment utilizes α-450 made by Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd.) on conditions of 120° C., 2.5 kgf/cm, 0.5 m/min. This allows the dry film to break in to the taper portion


16


and the straight portion


14


of the nozzle


12


. Moreover, the resist flows out of ink jet opening of the nozzle, covering a portion around the edge of the nozzle opening of a width of 1 μm, and then the resist is hardened by a double-sided exposure.




On the other hand, in order to form a water-repellent coating with a single crystal BN (boron nitride) added thereto, prepare a fluoroplastic containing Ni plating solution (made by Hikifune Co., Ltd.) to which a BN with longitudinal particle size of 1 μm or smaller (particles of more than 1 μm being crushed to this size) is added at the rate of 20 g/l and coat a water-repellent plating to the nozzle plate


10


masked as described above.




The nozzle plate


10


, made of stainless steel (SUS430), is drenched in 10% hydrochloric acid for three minutes, washed in water to remove an oxidized coating and is strike Ni plated to improve its plating adhesion.




The specification of the strike Ni plating is as follows.























(1)




Bath composition










nickel chloride (NiCl2. 6H


2


O)




220




g/l








hydrochloric acid (HCl 35%)




45




g/l















(2)




Temperature




room temperature







(3)




Electrode








titanium basket (150 × 30 × 250 mm)








electrolytic nickel (ø 1B × 10 mm)
















(4)




Current density




2




A/dm


2

















After one-minute plating by using this strike Ni plating solution, the nozzle substrate is drenched in a water-washing bath and immediately commences a water-repellent plating process. The specification of the water-repellent plating is as follows.




















(1)




Solution composition









nickel sulfamate




420




through 480 g/l







nickel chloride




40




through 50 g/l







boric acid




30




through 40 g/l







PTFE




40




through 50 g/l







BN




20




g/l







PH




4.0




through 4.4






(2)




Temperature




42°




C.






(3)




Electrode







titanium basket (150 × 30 × 250 mm)







electrolytic nickel (ø 1B × 10 mm)







diaphragm






(4)




Current density




2




A/dm


2
















The nozzle substrate is plated for three minutes by using this water-repellent plating solution. After washed in water, it is drenched in a NaOH (3 wt %) solution, removes a resist, and then after water washing and drying processes, makes PTFE into a coating adhered as a plating by a heating process at 350° C. for thirty minutes. The plated coating, as shown in a photograph attached herewith, has BN particles scattered thereon, whereby preventing a convex portion of the BN particles from being scratched even though an outermost fluoric coating is scratched by friction and abrasion of a wiper (rubber blade), so that a water-repellent effect can be maintained.




Referring next to

FIGS. 8 and 9

, a description will be given of an inkjet head


300


of the present invention.

FIG. 8

is an exploded view of the completed inkjet head


300


and

FIG. 9

is a partially enlarged side view of the inkjet head


300


. As seen from

FIG. 8

, the inkjet head


300


of the present invention comprises a pressure chamber plate


310


, a piezo-electric element


320


, a nozzle plate


330


, a resin film


340


and a protective layer


350


. The nozzle plate


330


corresponds to the nozzle plate


10


shown in FIG.


1


and the pressure chamber plate


310


corresponds to the pressure chamber plate


30


shown in FIG.


1


. The pressure chamber plate


310


, the resin film


340


and the protective layer


350


are aligned with each other at a nozzle connection surface


360


that is a surface to which a surface


330




a


of the nozzle plate


330


is connected. In other words, the front surface


310




a


of the pressure chamber plate


310


, a front surface


340




a


of the resin film


340


and a front surface


350




a


of the protective layer


350


form the flat nozzle connection surface


360


.




The pressure-chamber plate


310


has the desired number (four in

FIG. 8

for description purposes) of pressure chambers


312


and ink introduction channels


314


and a common ink chamber


316


in an approximately rectangular parallelepiped glass plate. Each pressure chamber


312


receives and accommodates ink, and jets the ink from a nozzle


332


connected to an opening


312




a


as its internal pressure increases. The internal pressure changes according as the piezo-electric block


321


just under the pressure chamber


312


deforms, as will be described later. The pressure chamber


312


is formed as an approximately rectangular parallelepiped space by a concave groove on the pressure chamber plate


310


and the elastically deformable resin film


340


. The common ink chamber


316


supplies ink to each pressure chamber


312


via the corresponding ink introduction channel


314


. A bottom of the common ink chamber


316


is defined by the resin film


340


so as to absorb sudden internal pressure changes, and connected to an ink feed device (not shown) at a side surface


310




b


of the pressure chamber plate


310


. The common ink chamber


316


supplies a necessary amount of ink to the pressure chamber


312


via the ink introduction channel


314


when the pressure chamber


312


returns to the original state after the chamber


312


contracts, receives pressure and jets ink.




The resin film


340


defines one surface of each of the pressure chambers


312


, the common ink chamber


316


and each of the ink introduction channels


314


, and serves to transmit a deformation of each piezo-electric block


321


which will be described later to the corresponding pressure chamber


312


and to prevent ink in the pressure chamber


312


from penetrating into grooves


323


in the piezo-electric element


320


. The resin film


340


is, for example, approximately 16 μm thick and the order of Gpa adhesive. The resin film


340


, which is a member that forms one surface of the pressure chamber


312


, may be replaced with an elastic metal thin film.




The piezo-electric element


320


has layered structure having a plurality of (four in

FIG. 1

for description purposes) piezo-electric blocks


321


which are divided by parallel grooves


323


which extend from a front surface


320




a


to a rear surface


320




b


. Internal electrodes


322


and


324


are provided between layers of piezoelectric blocks


321


, and the internal electrode


322


is connected to an external electrode


326


and the internal electrode


324


is connected to an external electrode


328


.

FIG. 8

shows only one external electrode


328


for illustration purposes. As shown in

FIG. 9

, an active area


325


is a portion where the internal electrodes


322


and


324


overlap each other in direction A, and each piezo-electric block


321


deforms in the active area


325


. The length of each active area


325


is adjustable depending upon a pressure to be applied to the pressure chamber


312


. Since the active area


325


is spaced at a predetermined distance from the nozzle connection surface


360


, even when the piezo-electric blocks


321


deform, such deformation does not affect the adhesion between the piezo-electric element


320


and the protective layer


350


at the nozzle connection surface


360


.




The external electrode


326


is an electrode layer that is evaporated onto an entire surface of the front surface


320




a


of the piezo-electric element


320


, and an external electrode commonly used for all the piezo-electric blocks


321


. The external electrode


326


is grounded. On the contrary, the external electrode


328


, which is provided on the rear surface


320




b


of the piezo-electric element


320


, is however an electrode layer which is not evaporated onto an entire surface of the rear surface


320




b


and is independently provided only on a portion corresponding to each piezo-electric block


321


. The external electrode


328


has no potential unless electrified, but may apply a positive voltage to the internal electrode


324


.




Due to such a structure, each piezo-electric block


321


of the piezo-electric element


320


does not deform when no voltage is applied to the external electrode


328


, since both potentials of the internal electrodes


322


and


324


remain zero. On the other hand, when a voltage is applied from the external electrode


328


, each piezo-electric block


321


may deform in the direction A (longitudinal direction) in

FIG. 8

, independent of the other piezo-electric blocks


321


. In other words, the direction A is the polarization direction of the piezo-electric blocks


321


. When the electrification to the external electrode


328


stops, that is, when the piezo-electric element


320


is discharged, the corresponding piezo-electric block


321


returns to the original state.




The piezo-electric element


320


of this embodiment is made of a plurality of green sheets


327


. Each green sheet


327


is blended with solvents such as a ceramic powder, etc., kneaded into a paste and then formed to be a thin film having a thickness of about 50 μm by a doctor blade.




Among these green sheets, a pattern of the internal electrode


322


is printed and formed onto one surface of each of three green sheets, a pattern of the internal electrode


324


is printed and formed onto one surface of each of another three green sheets, and no internal electrode is formed onto the remaining sheets. Each of the internal electrodes


322


and


324


is printed by blending alloy powder of silver and palladium with a solvent into a paste to apply for its pattern formation.




Then, the three sheets including the internal electrode


322


and the three sheets including the internal electrode


324


are alternately stuck together, and thereafter the remaining six sheets are also stuck together. Thereby, the layered structure of the piezo-electric element


320


is formed as shown in FIG.


9


. The green sheets that include none of the internal electrode


322


or


324


are stuck at a lower portion (in

FIG. 9

) of the piezo-electric element


320


and form a base part. These layered green sheets are sintered. Then, at least six sheets are partially cut by a diamond cutter from the front surface


320




a


to the rear surface


320




b


, whereby a plurality of the piezo-electric blocks


321


divided by the grooves


323


is formed. Lastly, the external electrodes


326


and


328


are formed by vacuum evaporation at the front surface


320




a


and the rear surface


320




b


. It is possible to form the grooves


323


before sintering. The completed piezo-electric element


320


is submitted to a characteristic test by applying a voltage to the external electrodes


326


and


328


, and malfunctioning ones are eliminated.




The inkjet head


300


shown in

FIG. 8

further comprises the protective layer


350


. The protective layer has useful effects as will be explained later, but there is a choice whether the protective layer is provided.




The protective layer


350


is a thermosetting epoxy adhesive member having an approximately rectangular parallelepiped shape with a thickness of about 50 μm, and connected via a surface


350




b


to the front surface


320




a


of the piezo-electric element


320


(external electrode


326


). The materials for the protective layer


350


, however, are not limited to this type. For example, an epoxy filler member, an acrylic resin, a polyethylene resin or the like are usable for the protective layer


350


. The protective layer


350


in the actual inkjet head


300


does not have a rectangular parallelepiped shape in the strict sense of the term, and an interface between the protective layer


350


and the piezo-electric element


320


is not clear or simple as shown in

FIGS. 8 and 9

by the external electrode


326


and the surface


350




b


. The protective layer


350


partially penetrates through the grooves


323


into the piezo-electric element


320


before heatedly solidifying. Accordingly, it is preferable that the protective layer


350


is made of insulators so as to prevent a short circuit of the internal electrodes


322


and


324


. The protective layer


350


of this embodiment is applied to the piezo-electric element


320


(external electrode


326


) all over the front surface


320




a


, but may, if necessary, be applied partially.




The protective layer


350


spaces the piezo-electric element


320


about 50 μm apart from the nozzle connection surface


360


. If ink leaked from the pressure chamber


12


and penetrated into the piezo-electric element


320


, the ink would penetrate into the piezo-electric element


320


mainly along the nozzle connection surface


360


. However, the protective layer


350


spaces from the nozzle connection surface


360


the piezo-electric element which has been conventionally located on the nozzle connection surface


360


, and thereby prevents the ink from penetrating into the piezo-electric element


320


and short-circuiting the internal electrodes


322


and


324


.




Moreover, the protective layer


350


shields the grooves


323


. If ink leaked and penetrated into the piezo-electric element


320


, the ink would penetrate mainly from an opening


312




a


of the pressure chamber


312


, running along the nozzle connection surface


360


, through the grooves


323


into the piezo-electric element


320


. However, the protective layer


350


does shield the grooves


323


against or from the nozzle connection surface


360


, and thereby prevents the ink from penetrating into the groove


323


from somewhere in the neighborhood of the front surface


320




a


of the piezo-electric element


320


and short-circuiting the internal electrodes


322


and


324


.




In addition, the protective layer


350


also has the effect of protecting the piezo-electric element


320


from being destroyed by polishing in a polishing process for forming the nozzle connection surface


320




a


among various steps of manufacturing the inkjet head. Consequently, the polishing process never causes any removing crack and chip-off of the piezo-electric element


320


. The external electrode is never cut off. Furthermore, the pressure chamber plate


310


, which is made of glass, is rather strong, and thereby enables such a high polishing speed as to shorten the polishing time down to about one-fifth in comparison with conventional manufacturing methods.




The nozzle plate


330


is made of metal, e.g. stainless steel, etc. Each nozzle


332


may be formed, as described above with reference to

FIG. 6

, with a punch using a pin or the like, preferably into a conic shape (or as showing a tapering section) spreading from the front surface


330


b toward the rear surface


330




a


of the nozzle plate


330


. To obtain such a conic shaped nozzle


332


is one of the reasons why the pressure chamber plate


310


and the nozzle plate


330


are not formed in one but the nozzle plate


330


is adhered to the pressure chamber plate


310


. In this embodiment, the nozzle


332


is about 80 μm in diameter at the rear surface


330




a


and about


25


through 35 μm at the front surface


330




b


. The present invention is also applicable to such an inkjet head that a nozzle thereof is formed, for example, above the pressure chamber plate


310


shown in

FIG. 8

, unlike the inkjet head


300


.




On the surface (front surface)


330




b


of the nozzle plate


330


, at least around the nozzle


332


, is formed the water-repellent coating


100


. Of course, the water-repellent coating


100


may be formed all over the front surface


330




b


. The water-repellent coating serves to stabilize a wiping operation, which will be described later, and to provide a high quality image. It is to be construed that the water-repellent coating should be located differently to accompany the nozzle where the nozzle of the inkjet head is formed, for example, above the pressure chamber plate


310


shown in FIG.


8


.




In the inkjet head


300


, each external electrode


328


independently applies a voltage the internal electrode


324


of the piezo-electric block


321


, and each piezo-electric block


321


independently deforms in the direction A in

FIG. 1

, bending the resin film


340


in the direction A and compressing the corresponding pressure chamber


312


. This compression results in jetting ink from the pressure chamber


321


through the corresponding nozzle


332


. When the electrification from the external electrode


328


stops, the resin film


340


and the piezo-electric block


321


returns to the original states by discharging. At that time, the internal pressure of the pressure chamber


312


reduces and ink is supplied from the common ink chamber


316


through the ink introduction channel


314


to the pressure chamber


312


.




Although this embodiment uses the piezo-electric element


320


that deforms in the longitudinal direction, but another embodiment may use one that deforms in the lateral direction. Further, the present invention is not limited to the piezo-type inkjet head employing the piezo-electric element but applicable to the bubble-type inkjet head.




Referring next to

FIG. 10

, a description will be given of an inkjet printer


400


provided with the inkjet head


300


of the present invention. In each drawing, those members designated by the same reference numeral denote the same members, and a duplicate description will be omitted.

FIG. 10

schematically illustrates an embodiment of the color inkjet printer (recording device)


400


to which the inkjet head


300


of the present invention is applied. In a housing


410


of the recording device


400


, a platen


414


is rotatably provided.




In a recording operation, the platen


412


is driven to intermittently rotate by a driving motor


414


and send recording paper P at a predetermined feed pitch in the arrow direction W. In the housing


416


of the recording device, a guide rod


416


is provided in parallel to and above the platen


412


.




A carriage


418


is mounted to an endless driving belt


420


that is driven by the driving motor


422


reciprocating for scanning along the platen


412


.




The carriage


412


is mounted with a black recording head


424


and a color recording head


426


. The color recording head


426


may comprises three parts. The black recording head


424


is removably provided with a black ink tank


428


, and the color recording head


426


is removably provided with color ink tanks


430


,


432


and


434


. The inkjet head


300


of the present invention is applicable to such recording heads


424


and


426


.




Needless to say, the black ink tank


428


accommodates black ink and the color ink tanks


430


,


432


and


434


accommodate yellow ink, cyan ink and magenta ink respectively.




While the carriage


418


reciprocates along the platen


412


, the black recording head


424


and the color recording head


426


are driven based on image data received from a word processor and a personal computer, etc., predetermined characters, images and the like are recorded on recording paper P. When the recording operation is suspended, the carriage


418


is returned to its home position and this home position is provided with a nozzle maintenance mechanism (or backup unit)


436


.




The nozzle maintenance mechanism


436


is provided with a movable suction cap (not shown) and a suction pump (not shown) connected to the movable suction cap. When the recording heads


224


and


226


are placed at the home position, the suction cap is adsorbed to the nozzle plate of each recording head and the nozzle of the nozzle plate is sucked. This mechanism prevents the nozzle from being plugged. After that, a wiping unit (also not shown) wipes out the nozzle plate


330




b


with a wiper. On that occasion, the water-repellent coating


100


wipes out ink on the nozzle plate surface


330




b


completely, and the hard body


108


in the water-repellent coating


100


prevents the water-repellent coating from being destroyed or otherwise.




Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it is to be understood that various modifications and changes may be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.




According to the water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


1


, the water repellency of its fluoric polymer works well serving to provide a high quality image, and its hard body enhancing the wiping resistance of the fluoric polymer guarantees to continuously provide the high quality image. According to the water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


2


, its flat hard body is not so vulnerable to friction or likely to fall off compared with a spherical hard body, and therefore can keep its wiping resistance for a long time. According to the water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


3


, its flat body having a big particle diameter never prevents the nozzle plate surface from being smoothly wiped. According to the water-repellent coating as set forth in claims


4


and


5


, the flat hard body applicable to claim


1


is easily obtainable. The water-repellent coating as set forth in claims


6


and


7


can be easily formed without any special plating process. The recording device as set forth in claim


8


including the same water-repellent coating as claimed in claims


1


through


7


have the same effect as these claims.




The method of forming the water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


9


enables the hard body to protrude from the water-repellent coating surface; therefore, the wiping resistance of the water-repellent coating is advantageously enhanced. According to the method of forming the water-repellent coating as set forth in claim


10


, the fluoric polymer melts by the heat treatment taking in the additive hard body whereby sufficient water repellency is expected even on the surface of the intrinsically low water-repellent hard body.



Claims
  • 1. A print head comprising:a nozzle plate including a nozzle which jets ink; and a water-repellent coating which is formed on said nozzle plate as a substrate around said nozzle and comprises a fluoric polymer formed by a plating process and a hard body protecting said fluoric polymer.
  • 2. A print head according to claim 1 wherein said hard body has a flat shape.
  • 3. A print head according to claim 1 wherein a major axis of a particle diameter of said hard body does not exceed 1 μm.
  • 4. A print head according to claim 1 wherein said hard body includes a boron nitride single crystal.
  • 5. A print head according to claim 1 wherein said hard body includes a boron carbide single crystal.
  • 6. A print head according to claim 1 wherein an electrolytic plating process is adopted as said plating process.
  • 7. A print head according to claim 1 wherein an electroless plating process is adopted as said plating process.
  • 8. A recording device comprising:a print head; and a driving device which drives said print head wherein said print head includes: a nozzle plate including a nozzle which jets ink; and a water-repellent coating which is formed on said nozzle plate as a substrate around said nozzle and comprises a fluoric polymer formed by a plating process and a hard body protecting said fluoric polymer.
  • 9. A method of forming a water-repellent coating comprising the steps of:forming a resist onto a nozzle plate while partially projecting the resist from the nozzle outwardly; performing a strike deposit via the resist; performing a water-repellent coating containing a plated coating, a fluoric polumer and a hard body protecting said fluoric polymer via the resist; and removing the resist.
  • 10. A method of forming a water-repellent coating according to claim 9 further comprising the step of heating said water-repellent coating until a water repellency of said water-repellent coating becomes enough to make a contact angle of ink containing 10% of alcohol 60 degrees or larger.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
11-071202 Mar 1999 JP
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
5502470 Miyashita et al. Mar 1996 A
5863371 Takemoto et al. Jan 1999 A
5919572 Blum et al. Jul 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0 506 128 Sep 1992 EP
56-166085 Dec 1981 JP
59-47399 Mar 1984 JP
59-106918 Jun 1984 JP
59-176054 Oct 1984 JP
4-339662 Nov 1992 JP
5-4344 Jan 1993 JP
5-193140 Aug 1993 JP
6-246921 Jun 1994 JP
6-344560 Dec 1994 JP
7-171964 Jul 1995 JP
8-142334 Jun 1996 JP
8-244233 Sep 1996 JP
9-076492 Mar 1997 JP
09104109 Apr 1997 JP
9-31880 May 1997 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1999, No. 03 (Mar. 31, 1999) & JP 10 323984 A (Dec. 8, 1998) translation *abstract*.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1995, No. 03 (Apr. 28, 1995) & JP 06 344560 A (Dec. 20, 1994) *abstract*.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 014, No. 052 (Jan. 30, 1990) & JP 01 280566 A (Nov. 10, 1989) *abstract*.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 012, No. 197 (Jun. 8, 1988) & JP 63 003963 A (Jan. 8, 1988) *abstract*.