This application is entitled to the benefit of and incorporates by reference essential subject matter disclosed in International Application No. PCT/FR2007/001659 filed on Oct. 11, 2007 and French Patent Application No. 0609152 filed on Oct. 18, 2006.
The invention relates to a 3D composite fabric.
The present invention relates to a fabric with an optimized weave of the multiple-linked ply type that is suitable for use in producing composite material parts that are highly stressed in tension, compression, or bending, and/or that are subjected to impacts. Such parts include, for example, the stays, rods, and struts of landing gear.
Textile structures are known that are referred to as 1D or 2D structures, depending on whether their fibers extend in one direction only or in two different directions. In general, such structures do not make it possible to withstand the above-mentioned stresses effectively. So-called 3D structures that comprise fibers extending in three distinct directions in three-dimensional space are better at withstanding said stresses. So-called 4D, 5D, 9D, 11D, . . . structures are known to exist that comprise fibers extending in a larger number of distinct directions, but those structures are very complex and it is difficult to automate production thereof.
The invention thus relates more particularly to 3D textile structures.
These structures include 3D structures having a plurality of layers linked together by stitching. These structures are known to present good linearity when the weft fibers are bent, and they offer the advantage of including reinforcement. However, that method of linking does not impart good impact resistance to a part produced from such a fabric.
Multi-ply fabrics that are linked together by weaving are also known, with the orthogonal type 3D fabric (in which the ply-linking fibers extend substantially orthogonally to the plies) being the fabric that presents the best linearity for the weft fibers and the warp fibers (i.e. paths with small linking angles or small amounts of curvature), thereby withstanding compression well. Nevertheless, in order to ensure that such fabrics present an advantageous fiber volume fraction, it needs to be compressed, such that the yarns that are orthogonal to the plies and that serve to connect them to one another acquire large amounts of curvature, giving them highly undulating paths that are thus not very linear, which means that they cannot contribute effectively to transferring forces.
Although non-orthogonal 3D fabrics are more advantageous in this respect, they nevertheless suffer from the drawback of presenting linking fibers having linking angles or amounts of curvature that are too great, regardless of whether the weave of the fabric is simple, of the multi-ply taffeta, satin, or serge type, or the weave is more elaborate, such as the 3X type weave.
The fabric known as “2.5D” fabric, described in document FR 2610951, is particularly optimized and presents little expansion and a high percentage of surface occupation, but at the price of poor linearity (i.e. at least some of the fibers present large amounts of curvature or large linking angles). The definition of that fabric gives it angle characteristics that are harmful to withstanding impacts and limits reversible textile structures (i.e. structures obtained by turning the weave through 90°) to structures of low density, unless large numbers of additional plies are added, which makes automatic fabrication difficult.
The fabric described in document U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,241 is particularly optimized for withstanding impacts. Nevertheless, the high degree of interlacing between the plies limits the compression strength of an element made from such a fabric.
The invention provides a method of weaving an optimized 3D fabric presenting good ability to withstand impacts in particular, while being easily deformable.
The invention is described directly with reference to the sole accompanying FIGURE showing a base pattern of the fabric in a particular embodiment of the invention, in which the weft fibers are shown end-on and the warp fibers extend in planes parallel to the plane of the FIGURE. Here the fabric comprises a base pattern comprising:
In a first plane that coincides with the plane of the figure, the warp fibers under consideration A, B, and C are represented by continuous lines. The warp fiber A passes over the first weft fiber 1 of the first column C1, passes under the second weft fiber 16 of the fifth column C5, and passes over the first weft fiber 1 of the first column C1 of the following pattern. In the same plane, the weft fiber B and the weft fiber C are parallel to the weft fiber A, but they are offset in the thickness direction of the fabric, each time by one weft fiber.
In a second plane that is here located behind the first plane, the warp fibers are substantially parallel to the levels N1 . . . N7 and they are represented by dashed lines. The warp fiber D passes over the first weft fiber 5 of the second column C2, under the first weft fiber 8 of the third column C3, over the first weft fiber 13 of the fourth column C4, and so on. The warp fibers E and F follow parallel paths, being offset each time by one weft fiber in a direction parallel to the columns;
This disposition offers several advantages:
The invention is not limited to the above description, but on the contrary covers any variant coming within the ambit defined by the claims.
In particular, the base pattern of the weave described herein can easily be extended both in the thickness direction of the fabric (thus in the column direction), and in the lateral direction (thus in the direction of the levels).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 09152 | Oct 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2007/001659 | 10/11/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/17/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/049988 | 5/2/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
870697 | Stevenson | Nov 1907 | A |
2899987 | Finken et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
2929412 | Abendroth | Mar 1960 | A |
3749138 | Rheaume et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
4312913 | Rheaume | Jan 1982 | A |
4554953 | Borel et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4668545 | Lowe | May 1987 | A |
4848414 | Cahuzac | Jul 1989 | A |
4853269 | Fukumori et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4922969 | Campman et al. | May 1990 | A |
4958663 | Miller et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5021283 | Takenaka et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5080142 | Calamito et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5465760 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5899241 | David et al. | May 1999 | A |
6418973 | Cox et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6555488 | Qiu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6668868 | Howland et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7601288 | Dunleavy | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7704429 | Dunleavy | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7960298 | Goering | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20070137778 | Dunleavy | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070232171 | Maki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090186547 | Coupe et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214815 | Okada | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090223588 | Dunleavy | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100183836 | Wangenheim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100275764 | Egres, Jr. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0856601 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1526285 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2610951 | Aug 1988 | FR |
9012911 | Nov 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100323574 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |