This invention relates to the conversion of paperboard and other materials to carton blanks, and more particularly, to 3D printed scoring or cutting rules used in the conversion process.
In the conversion of paperboard, the die-cutting and creasing operations are often performed in a flat-bed die-cutting station, which can be off-line or in-line with a printing press. Die-cutting and creasing are frequently combined with embossing operations. Cutting and creasing operations of this type are generally performed on a flat bed cutter, but this invention is equally applicable to rotary die cutting as well as cutting/creasing of corrugated paperboard.
To achieve a consistent, accurate result, it is important to choose the right tools, machine settings, types of paperboard and conditions for the paperboard. Detailed technical information on tool design, machinery and settings is available through established suppliers of machines and tools. Less information, however, is available regarding the interactions between the machinery, tools and paperboard.
Various types of paperboards include mainly Solid Bleached Board (SBB), Folding Box Board (FBB) and White Lined Chipboard (WLC). Types of paperboard include Solid Bleached Sulfate (SBS), Coated Unbleached Kraft (CUK), Coated Recycled Board (CRB), and Folding Box Board (FBB). Corrugated paperboards include mainly virgin or recycled liner board and corrugating medium between the two pieces of liner. All grades can be cut and creased, but to achieve the best result for each application it is important to fine-tune the treatment to give the desired result. This is typically accomplished in a highly labor intensive manner. Due to the type and individual properties of the different paperboard grades, die-cutting, creasing and embossing can be performed to different levels of achievement.
Runnability through the die-cutting and creasing station is important. The paperboard web or sheet 1 (
Die-cut blanks 5 remain linked to one another by nicks 7 (
A typical die 11 consists of the cutting and creasing rules 3 mounted on a board 13, commonly of Russian birch or the like (
The most common tool used for die cutting is a steel blade rule 3 (
Once inserted into the board 13, the steel rules 3 are bordered by synthetic foam 17 that protects them and helps push cut components outside the tool when removing it (
The foam rubber 17 of the cutting die 11 plays a very important role for the quality of the final result. Correctly done, the foam rubber 17 also supports productivity by allowing higher speeds and minimizing the risk of stops due to waste 9 coming loose in the machine or sheets 1 not ejecting properly from the die 11. In the cutting operation, the rubber 17 fixes and secures the sheet 1 before and during the cutting and helps to strip the cut material from the sheet.
To achieve clean, debris-free edges it is important to have the correct cutting conditions. Due to its strength, toughness, and density, paperboard requires sharp, well-adjusted knives or rules and good control of the die-cutting machine. The high force required to cut through the paperboard should be well controlled to minimize what is called the “overshoot” of the moving die. Otherwise the rules will hit the make-ready counter plate too hard which will quickly damage the rules and degrade the quality of the cut edges.
When cutting paperboard sheets into carton blanks 5 it is important to achieve the desired shape to feed the blanks 5 properly. All cutting rules 3 must be of the same height to cut through the entire thickness of the paperboard across the die. Fine-tuning the level of each cutting rule is important, time consuming and complicated. Patching up, as it is called, in one area of the sheet might induce disturbances in other areas.
In addition to cutting the paperboard 1 to form the blank 5, the dies typically include creasing rules 3 to crease the paperboard at specific locations to facilitate folding the blank (
To achieve a well-formed crease, the relationship between its width and depth is of great importance and often determined by the creasing rule 3 and its placement on the board 13. Creasing is carried out using a rule typically in the form of a thin strip of steel with a round smooth edge and an accurately cut groove in a thin hard material on the make-ready 15 (matrix or counter-die). The creasing rule 3 pushes the paperboard 1 into the groove 19 of the make-ready base 15, located under the paperboard, creating a permanent crease. The creasing tool's construction and performance are essential elements in obtaining a satisfactory result.
The creasing rules are fitted into the board 13. When performing the creasing operation, the die 11 reciprocates up and down towards the paperboard 1, which is placed on the make-ready base 15. After one cycle the cut and/or creased paperboard sheet is removed and a new one is fed into the machine. The thickness of the creasing rule, the groove width, the make-ready thickness, and the paperboard thickness must correspond to each other. Different types of paperboard require different tool geometries.
The paperboard is creased by being pressed into the channel or groove 1 in the make-ready base 15. The forces created deform the paperboard 1 in a predetermined way and the deformation is permanent. The result is a reduction in the bending resistance at the crease 21 (
Creasing is an operation which facilitates the folding operation. During creasing the paperboard is weakened along well defined folding lines, which then act as hinges for folding packaging and carton products. It is very difficult to fold paperboard with a good result without creasing. The surface plies will crack and/or the folding line will be undefined.
The labor intensive and time consuming process of preparing the die cutting and creasing board has proven to be a significant factor in limiting the production rates and adding to the cost of mass producing paperboard carton and other blanks. These and other shortcomings in the prior art have been addressed by various embodiments of this invention as described below.
According to various embodiments of this invention, a cutting and/or creasing rule is produced on a 3D printing machine which may be mounted on a board for use as a die for cutting and/or creasing a sheet of paperboard or other material into a blank for a carton. With the advent of additive manufacturing, i.e. 3D printing, it is now possible to eliminate traditional slotted die boards (with generally rectangular steel cutting and creasing rules) and replace same with surface printed boards with three-dimensional creasing and cutting rules.
One aspect of this invention is to “print” or manufacture the creasing and cutting rules with various printable materials, e.g. HDPE, polycarbonates, etc. Another aspect of this invention is to achieve the strength characteristics or better of traditional steel creasing/cutting rules by utilizing a 3D printed member instead of a traditional steel member. Since steel is much stronger than plastic, a dimensionally identical plastic structure will be weaker than the corresponding steel structure. To enhance the strength of three dimensionally printed rules in relation to traditional steel structures, the geometries of the 3D printed creasing and cutting rule is designed according to this invention both to withstand the downward and lateral forces exerted upon them by the die apparatus and to physically attach to the underlying die-board.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
According to various embodiments of this invention, a cutting and/or creasing rule 10 is produced on a 3D printing machine 12 (
One aspect of this invention is to “print” or manufacture the creasing and cutting rules 10 with various printable materials, e.g. HDPE, polycarbonates, etc. Another aspect of this invention is to achieve the strength characteristics or better of traditional steel creasing/cutting rules 3 by utilizing a 3D printed member instead of a traditional steel member. Since steel is much stronger than plastic, a dimensionally identical plastic structure will be weaker than the corresponding steel structure. To enhance the strength of three dimensionally printed rules in relation to traditional steel structures, the geometries, and more specifically the cross-sectional geometries in various embodiments, of the 3D printed creasing and cutting rule 10 is designed according to this invention both to withstand the downward and lateral forces exerted upon them by the die apparatus and to physically attach to the underlying die-board 14.
As noted above, the traditional steel creasing/cutting rule 3 is inserted into a slot (approximately ½ inch thick) which has been machined into the die-board 13 (corresponding to the desired shape of the carton to be cut/creased). Most of the prior art steel creasing rules 3 are therefore located beneath the surface of the die board 13. This provides lateral stability.
With a surface or 3D printed creasing/cutting rule 10 according to this invention, the lateral stability is provided for in the shape of the rule 10. The lateral stability of the 3D printed creasing/cutting rule 10 is therefore provided for with the geometry of the rule 10 itself and its attachment means to the die-board 14 or substrate.
The shape and geometries of the 3D printed rules 10 of various embodiments of this invention have a cross section shape which is wider at a proximal portion 16 and narrower at the distal portion 18, versus traditional creasing/cutting rules 3 which essentially have a constant width throughout with the minor rounded/sharpened tip at the very distal end. The distal portion 18 may have a first and a second exterior face 22, 24, respectively. Various exemplary configurations for the distal portion 18 and the faces 22, 24 are shown in
Examples of 3D printed rules 10 according to various embodiments of this invention are shown in
The distal portion 18 is narrower than the proximal portion 16 and may include a tapered or narrowing cross-sectional configuration compatible with the make-ready base 15. The distal portion 18 may be symmetric about an axis A extending generally perpendicular to the board 14 and through the tip 20 (
The various geometries and designs of embodiments of the rule 10 according to this invention may be produced or printed on an industrial 3D printing machine 12, one example of which is shown in
In addition to the geometries of the 3D printed rules 10 depicted and described herein, other aspects of this invention include methods for attaching the rule 10 to the die board 14.
One such method is that of printing a wider railroad track base as part of the proximal portion 16 or in conjunction therewith and affixing the rule 10 with adhesives and/or screws, tacks or other mechanical fasteners to counter the lateral forces created by the die cutting machine. The die machine operates in a rocking motion rather than a straight up/down motion which creates substantial lateral forces on the tooling. Alternatively, the proximal portion 16 of the rule 10 may include holes or apertures through which nails, screws or other fasteners may be inserted and subsequently embedded in the adjacent board 14 for securing the rule 10 to the board 14. Such techniques may also allow for removal and/or re-positioning of the rule 10 relative to the board 14.
The above methods may require the removal of 3D printed tooling from the platform of the 3D printer and re-registration on the die board 14. This can be accomplished by registering the rule 10 from a centerline on the die cutting machine.
Another method according to this invention involves first selecting the geometry of the creasing/cutting rule 10 based upon the orientation of the creasing/cutting rule 10 relative to the direction of the paper path on the die machine. For example, the cutting and creasing rule 10 located in the “front” of the die undergoes the greatest abuse due to the rocking movement of the die machine. A rule 10 with a wider proximal portion 16 provides better support to brace the rule 10, whereas, a rule 10 that runs parallel to the paper path may employ a narrower proximal portion 16 to save material, for example. As such, for a given paperboard blank 5 configuration, the rule 10 which is employed may have a different geometry for one region of the blank 5 than the rule 10 which is employed for other regions of the blank 5.
After selecting the dimensionally appropriate rule configuration, a polycarbonate die board may be placed directly beneath a 3D print head of a 3D printing machine 12. Next a polycarbonate or other suitable material is deposited on the polycarbonate die-board 14 and physically fused to the die-board 14 by heating that portion of the die-board 14 which is to be in contact with the rule 10 without heating the entire die-board 14 so as not to expand the die board 14 itself.
This results in a one-piece composite structure in perfect registration with no need to further register or attach the rule 10 to the die board 14. Instead, the actual die-board is removed from the 3D printer 12 and inserted directly into the die-chase of the die machine for cutting/creasing. 3D printers commonly print upon a heated surface. After printing the structure, it is removed from the 3D printer base. With various embodiments of this invention, the rule 10 is printed and fused directly on the die-board 14. Moreover, other aspects of this invention include 3D printing and/or fusing a piece of ejection material (with properties identical to the ejection rubber) directly on the die board without the need to either manually or mechanically cut/shape the rubber first.
Another aspect of this invention is a hybrid 3D print/analog die and counter. This embodiment starts with synthetic substrate shaped to the tooling that typically goes into the die-cutter (i.e. die board shape and counter plate shape). According to aspects of this invention, the 3D printer 12 may be designed in such a manner that the die boards 14 and counter plates 15 are actually the 3D printing base. Such a design of the 3D printer may be such that a heat source precedes the 3D printer head and warms only the portion of the surface that will come into contact with deposited material. Materials utilized for the rule 10 and board 14 may include those that when heated will permit fusing of deposited materials to the base.
Traditional die boards and counter plates are made of substances such as wood, stainless steel etc. and conventional 3D printed materials will not fuse/bond to them, at least not to the extent that they can withstand several tons of force.
Also, if a synthetic, such as a polycarbonate is heated in its entirety, it will expand and contract at a different rate than the 3D printed materials and the materials may dislodge from the base. Hence the laser-focused heating of the base.
Another embodiment uses the printed screw-hole design of creasing/cutting rule to further minimize the possibility of the rule coming loose under extreme pressure.
In various embodiments, it may be possible to 3D print the entire apparatus (die board and/or counter plate with appropriate rules/counters attached), and one would not have an issue with fusing the rule to the board/plate because it would already be in one piece. This may, however, add a lot of cost for deposited material, and take a great deal of time.
Other disadvantages of utilizing a solid piece are that there is no possibility for re-using the die board. With our invention, the rule 10 can be chiseled off and the surface reground/re-planed when the die becomes otherwise obsolete.
Another aspect of this invention includes the possibility that a die can be modified or repaired in the field using the laser-focused heat/3D print methodology. For example, if someone wanted to change a dispenser feature on a 12-pack without making an entirely new 3D printed die board/creasing/cutting rule, etc. he/she could do so with our technique but could not if they 3D printed the entire board, rule, counter, etc.
From the above disclosure of the general principles of this invention and the preceding detailed description of at least one embodiment, those skilled in the art will readily comprehend the various modifications to which this invention is susceptible. Therefore, I desire to be limited only by the scope of the following claims and equivalents thereof.
This claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/428,590, filed Dec. 1, 2016 and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3653304 | Lenoir | Apr 1972 | A |
3981213 | Lopman | Sep 1976 | A |
D245831 | West et al. | Sep 1977 | S |
4289492 | Simpson | Sep 1981 | A |
D276528 | Shaffer | Nov 1984 | S |
D277864 | Hoffman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1985 | S |
4963126 | Jesch | Oct 1990 | A |
D343398 | Dunn | Jan 1994 | S |
6203482 | Sandford | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6441338 | Rabinovich | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D616317 | Yeh | May 2010 | S |
20050209075 | Kocherga et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080108490 | Kocherga et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100257987 | Palm et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20130029823 | Zoeckler | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140352509 | Schroder | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2886320 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2886320 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2530723 | Apr 2016 | GB |
2530723 | Apr 2016 | GB |
H09300299 | Nov 1997 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Seaga Group, Creasing Rule, web site print out, 1 pg., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Advanced Die Supplies, Creasing Rule, web site printout, 3 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
HD Stahl-Steel-Acier, HD Creasing Rules, web site printout, 3 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Ameri-Ken, Steel Rule—Creasing, web site printout, 3 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Cito Group, Hinge Crease, web site printout, 5 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Rotalaser; Consumable Materials, web site printout, 3 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Up Group, Creasing Rule, web site printout, 1 pg., Feb. 24, 2017. |
Fag Graphic Systems, Creasing, Scoring, Folding, Embossing, Manual, 53 pgs., Undated. |
Iggesund Paperboard, Die-cutting and creasing, Manual, 24 pgs., Feb. 24, 2017. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, International Preliminary Report on the Patentability; PCT/US2017/064171, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 5 pgs. |
International Searching Authority, PCT/US2017/064171; Search Report and Written Opinion, 12 pgs, dated Dec. 1, 2017. |
www.creativemechanisms.com; Additive Manufacturing vs Subtractive Manufacturing; Jan. 4, 2016, 7 pgs. |
European Patent Office, Rule 62 EPC Communication issued in EP 17877202.6-1016 / 3548233 dated Jun. 18, 2020 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180154602 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62428590 | Dec 2016 | US |