Patent Grant
RE48825
The present invention relates to toluenesulfonic acid addition salt crystals of specific substituted heterocycle fused gamma-carbolines, the method of making and using such crystals.
Substituted heterocycle fused gamma-carbolines and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts are represented by the core structure shown in Formula 1 J:
These compounds are disclosed in WO 2000/77010; WO 2000/77002; WO 2000/77001; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,713,471; 6,552,017; 7,081,455; 6,548,493, 7,071,186; Reissue U.S. Pat. Nos. 39,680; 39,679; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/906,473, the contents of each of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. These compounds have been found to be useful as 5-HT2 receptor agonists and antagonists used in treating disorders of the central nervous system including a disorder associated with 5HT2C or 5HT2A receptor modulation selected from obesity, anorexia, bulimia, depression, a anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, migraine, obsessive-compulsive disorder, sexual disorders, depression, schizophrenia, migraine, attention deficit disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, sleep disorders, conditions associated with cephalic pain, social phobias, gastrointestinal disorders such as dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract motility.
As a free base, substituted heterocycle fused gamma-carbolines exist in liquid form and are susceptible to N-oxidation and/or degradation. Such unstable characteristics could render these compounds undesirable as pharmaceutical products. The prior art discloses a large number of substituted heterocycle fused gamma-carboline derivatives in free base form as well as a large number of pharmaceutically acceptable salts, including hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, sulfamic, phosphoric, nitric and the like; and the salts prepared from organic acids such as acetic, propionic, succinic, glycolic, stearic, lactic, malic, tartaric, citric, ascorbic, pamoic, maleic, hydroxymaleic, phenylacetic, glutamic, benzoic, salicylic, sulfanilic, 2-acetoxybenzoic, fumaric, toluenesulfonic, methanesulfonic, ethane disulfonic, oxalic, isethionic, and the like. Of the large numbers of possible pharmaceutically acceptable salt compounds disclosed in the prior art, none were shown to have particular stability or desired properties. Because many pharmaceutical compounds can exist in different physical forms (e.g., liquid or solid in different crystalline, amorphous, polymorphous, hydrate or solvate forms) which can vary the stability, solubility, bioavailability or pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion or the like) and/or bioequivalency of a drug, it is of critical importance in pharmaceutical development to identify a pharmaceutical compound of optimal physical form (e.g., free base or salt in solid, liquid, crystalline, hydrate, solvate, amorphous or polymorphous forms).
We have surprisingly found that a particular substituted heterocycle fused gamma-carboline is especially stable in toluenesulfonic acid addition salt form and is especially advantageous in the preparation of galenic formulations of various and diverse kind. The present invention therefore provides 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone tosylate salt in solid form (“Solid Salt of the Present Invention”). In particular, the present invention provides 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone tosylate salt crystal (“Salt Crystals of the Present Invention”). It has been surprisingly found that the Salts Crystals of the Present Invention are especially stable and preferred for galenic and/or therapeutic use. The invention therefore provides the following:
The invention also provides the following:
As useused herein, the term “crystal” or “crystals” or “crystalline” or “crystalinic” refers to any solid that has a short or long range order of the molecules, atoms or ions in a fixed lattice arrangement. Salt Crystals of the Present Invention may be in a single crystal form. Therefore, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention may be in a triclinic, monoclinic, orthorhombic, tetragonal, rhobohedralrhombohedral, hexagonal or cubic crystal form or mixtures thereof. In particular, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention are in dry crystalline form. In another embodiment, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention are in needle form. In still another embodiment, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention are in thin flakflake or flake fragment form. In a particular embodiment, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention are substantially free of other forms, e.g., free of amorphous or other crystal forms.
The term “substantially free” of other crystal forms refer to less than about 10 wt. %, preferably less than about 5 wt. %, more preferably less than about 2 wt. %, still preferably less than about 1 wt. %, still preferably less than about 0.1%, most preferably less than about 0.01 wt. % of other crystal forms, e.g., amorphous or other crystal forms. For example, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention is in Form A and are free or substantially free of other salt forms, e.g., greater than 90 wt. % of Form A with less than 10 wt. % of the amorphous or other crystal forms. In another example, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention is in Form B free or substantially free of other salt forms, e.g., greater than 90 wt. % of Form B with less than 10 wt. % of the amorphous or other crystal forms. Preferably, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention comprises greater than 99 wt. % a single crystal form. Similar to “substantially free”
The term “predominantly” or “substantially entirely in a single form” refers to less than about 10 wt. %, preferably less than about 5 wt. %, more preferably less than about 2 wt. %, still preferably less than about 1 wt. %, still preferably less than about 0.1%, most preferably less than about 0.01 wt. % of other crystal forms, e.g., amorphous or other crystal forms. For example, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention is in Form A and are free or substantially free of other salt forms, e.g., greater than 90 wt. % of Form A with less than 10 wt. % of the amorphous or other crystal forms. In another example, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention is in Form B free or substantially free of other salt forms, e.g., greater than 90 wt. % of Form B with less than 10 wt. % of the amorphous or other crystal forms. Preferably, the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention comprises greater than 99 wt. % a single crystal form.
The term “patient” includes human or non-human.
The term “solvate” refers to crystalline solid adducts containing either stoichiometric or nonstoichiometric amounts of a solvent incorporated within the crystal structure. Therefore, the term “non-solvate” form herein refers to salt crystals that are free or substantially free of solvent molecules within the crystal structures of the invention. Similarly, the term “non-hydrate” form herein refers to salt crystals that are free or substantially free of water molecules within the crystal structures of the invention.
The term “amorphous” form refers to solids of disordered arrangements of molecules and do not possess a distinguishable crystal lattice.
The crystallinity or the morphology of the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention may be determined by a number of methods, including, but not limited to single crystal X-ray diffraction, X-ray powder diffraction, polarizing optical microscopy, thermal microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), infrared adsorption spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Characterization of solvates or hydrates or lack thereof may also be determined by DSC and/or TGA.
The Solid Salt of the Present Invention may be obtained by methods generally known in the art and provided in U.S. Pat. No. WO 2000/77010; WO 2000/77002; WO 200077001; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,713,471; 6,552,017; 7,081,455, 7,071,186; reissued U.S. Pat. Nos. 39,680; 39,679, e.g., reacting the free base with the toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate in a solvent, e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropol, ethyl acetate, methylene chloride, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, acetone, acetonitrile, water or the like.
Crystallization methods are also well known in the art. Crystallization of the Salt of the Present Invention may be performed by either reacting the Free Base of the Present Invention with the toluenesulfonic acid, e.g., toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate in a solvent, e.g., C1-4alcohol (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol), acetone, ethyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran and optionally cooling said solution down, e.g., to 0°-25° C.
Alternative to starting with the free base, crystallization of the Salts of the present invention may be carried out by first dissolving the salt, e.g., the Salts or Salt Crystals of the Current Invention, e.g., any of formulae 1.1-1.29, in a single solvent, e.g., C1-4alcohol (e.g., methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol), acetone, ethyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran, preferably, optionally at an elevated temperature, e.g., greater than 25° C., e.g., at 30°-75° C., preferably in a minimum amount of solvent (i.e., saturate the solution). Crystallization may then be induced by a number of ways, e.g., in a single solvent system by (a) allowing the solvent to evaporate slowly until crystals are formed; (b) slowing down the rate of stirring or stopping agitation completely; (c) cooling the solution down, e.g., to less than 25° C., e.g., to −10°-20° C.; (d) adding crystal seeds, e.g., preferably, but not necessarily, the crystal of the compound which is being crystallized; or any combinations thereof; or in a multi-solvent system by adding an antisolvent(s), preferably a solvent having different polarity from the dissolution or the main solvent, e.g., water, heptane, hexane, butanone, or toluene or mixtures thereof to a solution of the compound in a methanol, ethanol or tetrahydrofuran solvent system.
In a particular embodiment, the Salt Crystals Form A of the Present Invention may be prepared by reacting 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone free base with a stoichiometric amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate in about 2-5 mL/g, preferably 3.5 mL/g of isopropanol per gram of the Free Base of the Present Invention and optionally cooling said solution until crystals start to form, e.g., to 15-25° C. Optionally, the solution may be seeded with the Salt Crystals of the Present Invention (if available).
In another embodiment of the invention, Salt Crystals Form B may be prepared by reacting 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone free base in ethanol, e.g., 2-5 mL/g, preferably 3 mL/g of ethanol per gram of the free base with a stoichiometric amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate. Optionally, another 0.5-1 mL of ethanol per gram of free base may be added and the mixture is cooled, e.g., to less than 25° C., e.g., about 10° C. until crystals are formed.
Dissolve the stating material, 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone (free base) (178.4 g, 0.453 mol, 1 eq) in 2-Propanol (624.4 mL, 3.5 mL mLtg). Add charcoal (10 g) and stir the resulting mixture for 10-20 minutes at room temperature. After this time, remove charcoal by filtration. Wash the filter cake with 2-Propanol (89.2 mL, 0.5 mL/g SM). Transfer the combined filtrate to a 3 L 3-neck round bottom flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen inlet, drying tube and thermocouple and placed in a cooling tub. Add the p-Toluenesulfonic acid monollydrate (86.24 g, 0.453 mol, 1 equivalent) in one portion (reaction exotherms to 33° C., clear dark brown is observed). Cool this solution to 15-25° C. using cold tap water. Seed the resulting solution or wait until solids start to form (usually takes 30-60 minutes). Thick beige/gray paste forms. Stir the resulting paste for a minimum of 3 hours at 15-25° C. Collect the solids by filtration (filtration and followed washes are quite slow). Wash the solids with 2-Propanol (2×150 mL, room temperature), and then with heptane (room temperature, 2×150 mL). Dry the solids in a vacuum oven at 35° C. to a constant weight. Yield: 214 g, 0.378 mol, 83.4%. HPLC=93.2% purity. Chiral HPLC=de 100%. Melting Point 179°-181° C. The following characterization is performed:
Infrared Spectroscopy:
Two to six milligrams of sample are ground with ca. 200 mg of KBr. The KBr pellet spectrum is obtained on a small sample of this mixture pressed into a suitable pellet using a Wilk's mini-press. The spectrum is defined by 16 scans at 2 cm−1 resolution. The spectrum is disclosed in
in Table 1.
Mass Spectrometry
Positive ion electrospray high-resolution mass spectrometry is carried out on Salt Crystals Form A (dissolved in 1:1 Acetonitrile: Water) with a PE Sciex Q-Star hybrid quadruple/time of flight mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer is internally calibrated using poly (ethylene gycol) monomethyl ether 350 (PPGMME 350). Two PEGMME 350 signals at m/z 363.1995 and 451.2519 are used to measure a (PEGMME350+Na)+ signal. This gave a value of 407.2261 which compares well with the calculated value of 407.2257. The sample signal is measured in a similar way and gives a value of m/z 394.2299, which is 1.0 ppm from the calculated value of 394.2295 for the protonated molecular ion of the free base. The interpretation of mass spectra (
NMR Spectroscopy
The 400 MGz 1H (
The 1H NMR spectrum (
NMR spectra are recorded on a Varian 400 MHz Unity-plus NMR spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm 1H/19F/15N-31P switchable probe. The 1H spectrum is recorded using 60° rf pulses and 16 transients. The 13C NMR spectrum is recorded using WALTZ proton decoupling, 60° rf pulses and 4096 transients.
Specific Rotation
The specific rotation is recorded on a Perkin Elmer model 343 Plus polarimeter operating at the sodium D-Line (589.3 nm) and utilizing a 5-s sample integration time. The sample temperature is maintained at 25° C. with a temperature controlled water-jacketed cell. The sample is prepared by dissolving ca. 475 mg of Salt Crystals Form A with MeOH in a 50-mL volumetric flask.
Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrophotometry
The ultraviolet/visible spectrum for Salt Crystals Form A can be found in 2 nm and 314 nm
2 nm) are found in the range of 200 nm to 500 nm. The molar extinction coefficient at 227 nm is calculated to be 43513 L*mol-1*cm-1. The molar extinction coefficient at 314 nm is calculated to be 4246 L*mol-1*cm-1. Calculation of Extinction Coefficient based on Salt Crystals Form A with a MW of 565.7. The spectra are recorded on a Cary 3 UV/Visible spectrophotometer using a 1.0 cm quartz cell. The samples are prepared in duplicate for each maxima wavelength at concentrations of ca. 0.12 mg/mL, 0.06 mg/mL for the maxima at 314 nm and ca. 0.012 mg/mL and 0.006 mg/mL for the maxima at 227 nm to optimize the spectra at each maxima examined. All samples are dissolved in methanol.
Residue on Ignition
Residue on ignition is performed according to USP 29/NF 24 (Supplement 2) 2006, General Chapter <281>. A sample of ca. 1 g is accurately weighed directly into a platinum crucible that has been previously ignited, cooled and weighed. The crucible is heated until the sample is thoroughly charred, then cooled. The residue is then moistened with approximately 1 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, heated gently until white fumes no longer evolved, then ignited in a muffle furnace at 600±50° C. until all the carbon within the crucible was consumed. The sample is then cooled to room temperature in a desiccator. After cooling, the weight of residue is taken. The moistening with sulfuric acid, heating and igniting as before, using a 30 minute ignition period, is repeated, until two consecutive weighings of the residue does not differ by more than 0.5 mg. Results: Residue on Ignition=0.05%.
Elemental Analysis
The elemental analysis of sample Salt Crystals Form A is found to be consistent with the empirical formula. Samples are analyzed in duplicate and oxygen is determined by difference.
1Average (n = 2)
2ChemWindow V.5.1
3Oxygen determined by difference (Halogens interfere with the direct measurement of Oxygen)
X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD)
The XRPD pattern of Salt Crystals Form A is shown in
XRPD data is collected at ambient temperature on a PANalytical X'Pert θ/θ diffractometer, operating with copper radiation at 45 kV and 40 mA, using an X'Celerator detector. Unmilled sample is placed on a flat stainless steel sample holder and leveled using a glass microscope slide. Incident beam optics consists of ⅛° fixed divergence slit, ¼° fixed anti-scatter slit, 0.04 rad Soller slit and nickel filter to filter out Kα2 radiation. Data is collected at 3° to 43° 2θ. A standard PC with Windows XP® operating system and PANalytical X'Pert Data Collector v 2.1a are used. X'Pert Data Viewer v 1.1a is used to plot the data. The unit is calibrated annually using NBS silicon powder as a standard.
XRPD patterns of
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
The DSC scan for Salt Crystals Form A is shown in
Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
The TGA scan for Salt Crystals Form A is shown in
Melting Point
A melting point determination is performed on an electro thermal capillary melting point apparatus. The sample is heated from a temperature of 160° C. at a ramp rate of 2° C./min. Capillary melting point data exhibit no true melting point as the material decomposes over the region of 176.8 through 181.0° C. Thus the endotherm does not represent melting.
Equip a 500 mL 3-neck round bottom flask with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen inlet, drying tube and thermocouple. Dissolve the starting material 4-((6bR,10aS)-3-methyl-2,3,6b,9,10,10a-hexahydro-1H-pyrido[3′,4′: 4,5]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]quinoxalin-8(7H)-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-butanone in toluenesulfonic acid addition salt (7.62 g, 0.01936 mol, 1 equivalent) in Ethanol (200 proof (50 mL). Charge the solution of starting material in ethanol (step 2) to the flask. Add p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (3.68 g, 0.01936 mol, 1 eq) in one portion followed by charcoal (3 g). Heat the resulting mixture to 75-80° C. and stir at this temperature for 5-10 minutes. After this time remove the charcoal by filtration and wash the filter cake with Ethanol (3×30 mL). Transfer the combined filtrate to a 1 L 3-neck round bottom flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen inlet, drying the tube and thermocouple and placed in a cooling tub. Cool the solution to 0-5° C. Suspension forms during cooling. Dilute this suspension with heptane and stir at 0-5° C. for a minimum of 13 hours at this temperature. Collect the solids by filtration. Wash the solids with cold Ethanol (20 mL, 0-5° C.) and then with heptane (room temperature, 50 mL). Dry the solids in a vacuum oven at 35° C. to constant weight. Yield 7.2 g, 0.0127 mol, 65.7%. HPLC: 96.4%. Chiral HPLC: de 100%. Melting point 182-183° C.
Dissolve the starting material, 66-H-113 Peak 1 (9.32 g, 0.02368 mol, 1 eq) in Ethanol (200 proof, 80 mL). Add charcoal (0.5 g) and stir the resulting mixture for 10-20 minutes at room temperature. After this time remove charcoal by filtration. Wash the filter cake with Ethanol (2×30 mL). Charge the solution of starting material in ethanol (from the previous step) to a 1 L 3-neck round bottom flask with a mechanical stiner, nitrogen inlet, drying tube and thermocouple the flask and placed in a cooling tub. Add p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (4.51 g, 0.02368 mol, 1 eq) in one portion at room temperature. Clear amber solution forms. Soon solids stat to form. Cool the resulting suspension to 0-5° C., stir for 1 hour at this temperature and then dilute with heptane (300 mL). Stir the suspension for a minimum of 13 hours at 0-5° C. After this time, obtain the solids by filtration (tan). Wash the solids cold with heptane (room temperature, 50 mL). Dry the solids in a vacuum oven at 35° C. to constant weight. Yield: 10.93 g, 0.01932 mol, 81.59%.
Salt Crystals of Form B has the following XRPD: The XRPD pattern of Salt Crystals Form B is shown in
Dissolve the starting material, 66-H-113 Peak 1 (5.28 g, 0.01342 mol, 1 eq) in Ethanol (200 proof, 35 mL). After this time, remove the charcoal by filtration. Wash the filter cake with 1 Ethanol (2×15 mL). Charge the solution of starting material in ethanol (from the previous step) to a 500 in L 3-neck round bottom flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, nitrogen inlet, drying tube and thermocouple. The flask is placed in a cooling tub. Add p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (4.51 g, 0.02368 mol, 1 eq) in one portion at room temperature. Clear dark amber solution forms. Soon solids start to form. Cool the resulting suspension to 0-5° C. stir for 1 hour at this temperature and then dilute with heptane (200 mL). Stir the suspension for a minimum of 13 hours at 0-5′C. After this time remove the solids by filtration (tan). Wash the solids cold with heptane (room temperature, 40 mL). Dry the solids in a vacuum oven at 35° C. to constant weight. Yield: 5.95 g, 0.010617 mol, 78.37%
Crude free base is dissolved in EtOH (3000 mL), and is transferred to a 12 L, 3-necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, a N2 inlet, and a temperature probe. To the stirred solution is then added 178.3 g of pTSA monohydrate (0.94 mol, 1 equiv relative to the crude free base). The batch is stirred at rt for ca. 1 h, and then the internal temperature is reduced to 2 to 4° C. with an ice bath. The batch is stirred at 2 to 4° C. for another 1 h, and the batch becomes a brownish white slurry. To the batch is then added heptane (6000 mL) through an addition funnel slowly in ca. 3 h. The resultant mixture is stirred at 2 to 4° C. for another 1 h, and is stored in a dark cold room for ca. 15 h. The batch is then filtered, and the solid is rinsed with heptane (1000 mL). After drying in a vacuum oven at 35 to 40° C. for 4 h, 345.8 g (61% yield) of a tan to brown solid was obtained. HPLC analysis showed the desired product at 96.9% purity. LC-MS analysis showed a major peak with M/e=394 (M+1). Chiral HPLC analysis showed the desired enantiomer (first eluting peak) with ca. 99.7% e.e. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) δ 2.12-2.32 (m, 4H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.52-2.70 (m, 2H), 2.80-2.94 (m, 1H), 2.90 (s, 3H), 3.02-3.24 (m, 5H), 3.26-3.42 (m, 4H), 3.50-3.76 (m, 4H), 6.48 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04-7.14 (m, 2H), 7.18 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (dd, J=6.3 Hz, J′=1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.92-7.98 (m, 2H), 10.60 (bs, 1H).
This application is a reissue of Ser. No. 14/954,845, filed on Nov. 30, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,586,960, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/177,689, filed on Feb. 11, 2014, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 12/922,056, now granted as U.S. Pat. No. 8,648,077, which was filed Sep. 10, 2010 under 35 U.S.C §371 which claims benefit to PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/001608, filed on Mar. 12, 2009 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/036,069, filed Mar. 12, 2008, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6548493 | Robichaud et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552017 | Robichaud et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6713471 | Robichaud et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 7071186 | Robichaud et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7081455 | Robichaud et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7183282 | Robichaud et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| RE39679 | Robichaud et al. | Jun 2007 | E |
| RE39680 | Robichaud et al. | Jun 2007 | E |
| 7462641 | Igo et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 8309722 | Tomesch et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8598119 | Mates et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8648077 | Tomesch et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8779139 | Tomesch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8993572 | Mates et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9168258 | Mates et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9199995 | Tomesch et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 20140364609 | Tomesch et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150072964 | Mates et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150079172 | Mates et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150080404 | Mates et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150166540 | Mates et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20160031885 | Li et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160194326 | Tomesch et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 2000077001 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000077002 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000077010 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Hackman, et al. JAMA, 296(14), pp. 1731-1732 (2006). |
| Jain et al., “Polymorphism in Pharmacy”, Indian Drugs, 23(6), pp. 315-316 (1986). |
| Jordan, V.C. Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery, 2, 205 (2003). |
| Newman et al., “Solid-state analysis of the active pharmaceutical ingredient in drug products”, Drug Discovery Today, vol. 8, No. 9, pp. 898-903 (2003). |
| Savjani et al., “Drug Solubility: Importance and Enhancement Techniques”, International Scholarly Research Network Pharmaceutics, vol. 2012, pp. 1-10 (2012). |
| Balbach, et al. “Pharmaceutical evaluation of early development candidates ‘the 100 mg-approach’ ”, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 275, pp. 1-12 (2004). |
| Bastin, “Salt Selection and Optimized Procedures for Pharmaceutical New Chemical Entities”, Organic Process and Research Development, vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 427-435 (2000). |
| Byrn, “Pharmaceutical Solids: A Strategic Approach to Regulatory Considerations”, vol. 12, No. 7, p. 945-954 (1995). |
| Grant, “Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids”, Chapter 1, pp. 1-10 (1999). |
| Guillory, “Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids”, Chapter 5, pp. 183-226 (1999). |
| Haynes, “Occurrence of Pharmaceutically Acceptable Anions and Cations in the Cambridge Database”, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 94, No. 10, pp. 2111-2120 (2005). |
| Li et al., “Discovery of a Tetracyclic Quinoxaline Derivative as a Potent and Orally Active Multifunctional Drug Candidate for the Treatment of Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Disorders”, vol. 57, pp. 2670-2682 (2014). |
| Singhal et al., “Drug polymorphism and dosage form design: a practical perspective”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 56, pp. 335-347 (2004). |
| Skoog, “Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 4th Edition”, p. 577 (1992). |
| Smith, A.D., et al., “Oxford Dictionary of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology”, Oxford University Press, p. 145, (1997). |
| Snyder et al., “Functional profile of a novel modulator of serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission”, Psychopharmacology, 232:605-621 (2015). |
| Snyder et al., “Functional profile of a novel modulator of serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission”, Psychopharmacology, Published online Aug. 2014, DOI 10.1007/s00213-014-3704-1. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61036069 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12922056 | US | |
| Child | 14177689 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14177689 | Feb 2014 | US |
| Child | 14954845 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14954845 | Nov 2015 | US |
| Child | 16294607 | US |
