This invention relates to electrical power converters.
With the rapid development of electronics one can find electric power converters, such as DC-DC and AC-DC converters, almost everywhere. In the search for an increasing power density, the switching frequency is being raised and multilevel converters are being used, reducing the size of passive filtering components.
The filtering components use a great portion of the volume of a power converter. To further reduce the size much effort is made in the development of (new) multilevel and multicell converter topologies, and modular converter structures. By using a higher number of levels, opposed to only two, the ripple, and consequently the volume of filtering components is reduced. Several popular examples of such multilevel/multicell converters include the flying capacitor converter, neutral-point clamped converter, cascaded cell multilevel converter and modular multilevel converter. However, current multilevel topologies have poor (linear) scaling of the levels with respect to the number of switches. There are multilevel topologies that scale exponentially with the number of switches, but these topologies require isolated voltage sources or they can not supply active power from each level.
Another point of concern is the reliability of power electronics. In most cost-driven applications, a single component failure immediately results in a defective product. To ensure sufficient reliability, power semiconductors are not used up to their full potential. A basic circuit that is applied in most power converter topologies is the commutation cell, which includes two switches, one inductor and one capacitor. The switches can be stressed more when making the circuit single-fault safe. However, this comes at a high cost: i.e. adding another six switches and drivers, and replacing each switch with two parallel branches of two series switches. This high cost for single-fault safe operation, also applies to the known multilevel converters such as the flying capacitor and neutral-point clamped converter, making it generally not interesting to implement except for special applications, such as aerospace ones.
Accordingly, it would be an advance in the art to provide multilevel power converters having improved scaling of output levels with respect to the number of switches and also having improved fault tolerance.
We provide an innovative commutation cell that allows for more flexibility. Adding multiple cells in series results in a rapid increase in the number of levels, and adding cells in parallel enables single-fault safe operation. This new commutation cell, designated as the extended commutation cell (ECC), leads to power converter topologies such as high-ratio converters and multilevel converters. The switching cell is modular and can be cascaded, doubling the amount of levels with each additional cell. Within the converter, the voltage rating of all switches is only determined by the capacitor voltages of the neighboring cells. The voltage across each cell capacitor is controlled independently of the load and can be adjusted in real-time, directly changing the output levels.
The extended commutation cell (ECC) is a four-port, four-switch switching cell that allows for energy transfer in two orthogonal directions throughout the cell. Due to this property a whole new group of power converters can be constructed, enabling more versatile, more reliable and more efficient power conversion.
A. Basic cell
The basic ECC is shown in
An example of the ECC assembled with metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor switches is given in
Operation of the ECC has two separate modes. One mode is the input-to-output direct connection, using switches S4η-3 and S4η-1 turned on simultaneously, as in
The second mode is the buck-boost operation. With the buck-boost operation, energy can be transferred between a voltage source connected between terminals a and b and the capacitor Cη. The two cycles for the indirect energy transfer between the input voltage source and the capacitor are shown in
Assuming continuous conduction mode for the buck-boost operation, the capacitor voltage is given by
where Dη⊥ is the buck-boost duty ratio for switches S4η-3 and S4η-2, and switches S4η-1 and S4ηbeing complementary. The peak voltage across all switches in the switching cell is UC
Operation of the ECC, with both input-to-output direct connection and buck-boost combined, is shown in
The buck-boost operation of the ECC can also be operated in a resonant mode to enable zero voltage switching. To enable soft-switching a small resonant capacitor Crη is placed across the inductor Lη. The inductor should be chosen such that the current always passes through zero and that there is enough energy to charge the capacitor Crη up to the adjacent capacitor voltage. The buck-boost operation with soft-switching is shown in
Note that the states in
Using the extended commutation cell a number of new converter topologies can be constructed. In the following subsections a few examples are given.
The most elementary multilevel converter that can be constructed on the basis of the ECC is a four-level converter. This converter uses a single extended commutation cell followed by a half-bridge to shape the two-port structure to a single output. The circuit diagram of the four-level converter is shown in
The output states of the four-level converter under input-to-output operation mode are shown in
In steady state the voltage across the capacitor C1 is defined by
where D1⊥ is the buck-boost duty ratio of the ECC.
In the previous section an extended commutation cell is used to make a four-level converter, having a single extended commutation cell followed by a half-bridge. By using the series connection of multiple ECCs a 2x-level converter can be constructed, where x is linearly related to the number of switches. As an example, a converter with three ECCs with a total of 16 output levels is shown in
In subsection II-B a converter is constructed by putting an arbitrary number of ECCs in series, followed by a half-bridge. This half-bridge can also be replaced by any direct converter, providing different number of output levels. A six-level converter, constructed with a single ECC followed by a flying capacitor three-level converter, is shown in
A modular multilevel type of converter can also be build using the ECC topology. This way the capacitors in each string can be balanced independent of the output current, reducing the circulating current in the converter. An example converter with two cells is shown in
A set of capacitor voltages can be determined to obtain a set with the maximum number of output levels for each cell count, this set is given in Table II. The number of cells indicates the number of ECCs per half-leg. In Table II the number of unique levels, indicated with N′ is also given for each σ.
Using the ECC in an alternative way the converter can be applied as a multilevel power factor correction (PFC) circuit for a rectified AC input. An example of such a PFC circuit is shown in
The switch node voltage usw has four possible voltage levels. These levels are given in Table III. In case the capacitor voltage is chosen equal to the output voltage (D1⊥=0.5) the valid input range of the converter is (−Ubus, 2Ubus) with bidirectional energy flow. As a result of this a 230 Vac system with PFC leads to a bus voltage of 200 Vdc opposed to the regularly used 400 Vdc. With the lower bus voltage, lower voltage components can be used resulting in lower switching and conduction losses for proceeding switched mode power supplies. The four-level PFC can also be expanded with more ECCs to provide more levels resulting in a smaller input inductor and/or a smaller current distortion on the input.
With a similar configuration as the PFC a high-ratio step-down or high ratio step-up converter can be assembled. By choosing the capacitor voltages appropriately, the converter can convert a high input voltage to low voltage output, using only low voltage switches.
The example converter in
In the state where the switch node voltage is at its maximum, as shown in
G. N-Level Split-Bus ac-dc Converter
Using the N-level converter from section III and exchanging the input and output results in an ac-dc converter with N levels. The energy flow for an asymmetric input is not equally distributed through the output capacitors, therefore an active balancing circuit can be added having inductor Lb and switches Sb1 and Sb2 as in the example of
By aggregating more extended commutation cells in series a multilevel converter with more output levels can be created. The cells can also be placed in parallel in a repeated pattern. The resulting circuit is a parallel redundant converter fabric where the load current is distributed over the different switches and passive components. A 4×4 fabric example is shown in
The converter fabric from
In the example, multiple switches may fail before the converter is unable to keep supplying the load. In three of four adjacent parallel ECCs a random switch may fail. In adjacent series cells a switch may fail in each cell without fully disabling the converter. In the half-bridge (HB) cells, at the end of each row, multiple open-switch failures are allowed but only a single failure to short. A single failure to short in one of the half bridge cells reduces the number of output levels by a factor of two.
Besides the advantages of redundancy, the fault tolerant converter provides also means to reduce stress in the cell capacitors. By performing interleaved buck- boost operation in each of the parallel cells the current ripple in the capacitors may be greatly reduced.
In the N-level converter each additional cell in the converter multiplies the number of available output voltage levels by two. Therefore the number of levels, as a function of the number of ECC cells, is given by
N=2σ·2=2σ+1 (3)
where σ is the number of cells cascaded in series and N is the number of levels. The initial factor of two is for the number of levels of the half-bridge. For a given number of cells the required number of switches, denoted by nS, is given by
n
S=4σ2 (4)
The resulting number of levels for a given number of switches is plotted in
For comparison, nS for a flying capacitor converter is given by
n
S=2(N−1) (6)
which is also valid for the neutral-point clamped and cascaded cell multilevel converter.
The resulting number of switches for both the ECC and flying capacitor converter, for an arbitrary number of levels, is shown in
At two or four levels the number of switches for the flying capacitor and ECC multilevel converter are equal, for higher numbers of levels the number of switches in the flying capacitor converter dramatically increases.
It should be emphasized that each of the ECC cells in an N-level converter has decoupled buck-boost and direct input-to-output operation modes. Therefore the buck-boost operation is independent for each ECC cell. If required, each of the cells may be operated at a different switching frequency or phase.
The output levels that can be achieved with the 16-level converter from
l∈{N/2, . . . , 1, −1, . . . , −N/2} (7)
In case a 0 level is required (uout=0V), two switch states will result in a 0V output and a maximum of 15 unique output levels will remain. The set of levels for an eight-level converter can be deducted from Table IV by removing uC
An example of a capacitor voltage choice for the 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-cell converter is shown in Table V together with the resulting output range and step size between adjacent levels, all these values being shown with respect to Udc. For each case in the table there is no 0-level. Note that in Table V the Jacobsthal integer sequence can be observed in the numerator of the capacitor voltage fractions.
Using this fact a general expression can be derived for the capacitor voltage and Δuout (the output voltage step). The capacitor voltage for Cη is given by
The resulting level step size is calculated with
The corresponding peak output voltage is given by
which converges to 3/2 as σ→∞.
In this section the relation between the direct input-to-output operation gating signals and the output levels is elaborated. A direct input-to-output gating signal is defined as
for η=1 . . . σ, and the output gating signal of the half-bridge is defined as
In Table VI the gating signals are given for each of the levels of a 16-level converter. The rightmost four columns indicate the contributions of Udc/2 and uC
A clear binary pattern can be observed in the columns defining and
. Similarly a gating signal can be defined for the buck-boost operation mode of the converter. This gating signal gη⊥ is defined as
The gating of the switches in each cell is eventually controlled by both gη⊥ and . The gating vector per cell gn is defined as
where the corresponding switch is “on” if the indicated condition is true. For the half-bridge switches the state is solely defined by .
In section III a converter is described with N levels. In each of the cells the cell output current is either iout, 0 or −iout. When switching between some of the adjacent output levels, the current in an ECC switches between iout and −iout or vice versa, resulting in an effective load step of 2iout. In Table IV, for the 16 levels converter, these steps occur between levels 5⇄4, 1−−1 and −4⇄−5.
Leaving out some levels, such that a step between iout and −iout cannot occur in adjacent levels, result in a subset of levels from the N-level converter. The number of remaining unique levels N′ for σ=1 . . . 5 is shown in Table VII, including the corresponding capacitor voltages to obtain equidistant output levels. In case N′ is odd, the converter has at least one zero-level.
In this special case of the N-level converter the Fibonacci sequence can be observed in the numerators of the capacitor voltages. The number of unique levels that remain is the sum of the Fibonacci sequence. A general expression is derived for the capacitor voltage and Δuout. The capacitor voltage for UC
where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number. The resulting level step size is calculated with
The corresponding peak output voltage is the sum of all capacitor voltages and half the bus voltage
where we make use of the Fibonacci sequence property that the sum over the Fibonacci sequence can be expressed as a single Fibonacci number minus 1. In the limit, for σ going infinite the peak output voltage converges to (φ+1/2)Udc, where φ refers to the golden ratio.
The number of unique levels N′ is the sum over the Fibonacci sequence, which again can be expressed with a single Fibonacci number, and is given by
The equations above can be made non-recursive when using Binet's formula to determine the nth Fibonacci number
At least two different sets of level vectors can be found for σ=3, a positive and negative aligned set. The positive aligned set is listed in Table VIII and the negative aligned set is listed in Table IX.
The example converter that is analyzed here is a two-cell eight-level with two branches in parallel as shown in
In the ECC based eight-level inverter, as shown in
Unfortunately a single failed switch cannot be entirely bypassed with the other switches due to the required parallel diodes. These diodes are always present in MOSFETs (metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors) and generally also in IGBTs (insulated-gate bipolar transistors), but the diodes are also required to provide a freewheeling path for the (positive and negative) inductor current. For the mitigation of this issue, there are three main solutions. The first option is to put a bidirectional switch in series with the inductor. In case of a switch failure in the cell, the inductor series switch must be opened to prevent any disturbance of the parallel cells. With the switch opened, the cell is entirely disabled and the power flow can be redirected to the available operational parallel cells. This solution is shown in
More specifically, in the embodiment of
The second option for continued operation with a single fault is to prevent the direct input-to-output operation that causes a short in the failed cell. This result in avoiding the use of half the available output levels. To achieve sufficient output quality the capacitor voltage set-points can be changed. The set of output levels for an eight-level converter is given in Table X, in case of a failure in the first cell, the levels {1, . . . , 4} or {−4, . . . , −1} cannot be used anymore. In case of a failure in the second cell, the levels {−3, −1, 2, 4} or {−4, −2, 1, 3} should be avoided.
The third possible option is to account for the cross-coupling between the input-to-output operation of the parallel cell(s) and the buck-boost operation of the damaged cell. Note that in this case the buck-boost operation is unidirectional, any unwanted current transferred through the damaged cell should be compensated by adjusting the current reference of the parallel operational cells.
The ECC can be used for constructing a sine wave with a high number of levels. To improve the quality of the sine wave even further the capacitor voltages can be adjusted real-time such that a perfect sine wave can be constructed. In that case an output filter can be completely omitted even with a relatively low number of levels. The downside is that the transient response is worse as the time constant of the buck-boost comes into play.
The most basic synthesized sine wave is made with a single cell converter. The resulting output signal and capacitor voltage are shown in
The two-cell converter seems ideal for sine wave synthesis as uC
For a given arbitrary reference u*out, and a two-cell ECC based converter with maximum capacitor voltages of ûC1 and ûC2, the level selection per interval is given in Table XI. The maximum output ranges from −(ûC1+ûC2) to +(ûC1ûC2). The corresponding capacitor voltage references are given in Table XII. The voltage references given in square brackets are not contributing to the output but are selected to prevent discontinuities in the reference.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/749,255, filed on Jun. 24, 2015, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Application Ser. No. 14/749,255 claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application 62/016,294, filed on Jun. 24, 2014, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62016294 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14749255 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 14935059 | US |