This application is the US national phase of international application PCT/GB2004/001111, filed in English on 16 Mar. 2004, which designated the US. PCT/GB2004/001111 claims priority to GB Application No. 0307272.5, filed 27 Mar. 2003. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to ammunition for use in a weapon having a rifled barrel, and especially to an improved form of projectile for small arms ammunition.
2. Discussion of Prior Art
When a projectile is fired from a rifled barrel, the projectile must deform as it travels along the barrel so that material forming part of the projectile is forced into the spaces between the lands forming the rifling. This process is called engraving, and causes a spin to be imparted to the projectile by virtue of the longitudinal twist of the rifling.
The deformation of the projectile, its travel along the barrel effectively as a force fit to the rifling, the high linear acceleration imparted by the gun propellant on firing, and the consequent high rate of angular acceleration and associated force acting between rifling and projectile all contribute to substantial wear on the barrel.
If this wear rate can be reduced, substantial benefits follow, including increased barrel life, higher muzzle velocity and hence increased accuracy and lethality.
For this reason, low friction, readily deformable materials are normally selected for small arms bullets, for example lead. In order to increase the overall density of the bullet, it has also been proposed to use steel. However, steel is not readily deformable, and causes unacceptable barrel wear. On the other hand, hardness is a very desirable characteristic for the bullet material, in order to minimise nose tip ablation during penetration of hardened targets such as, for example, titanium/kevlar body armour. For these purposes, a Vickers Hardness of at least 550 (using a 10 kg load) is the minimum desirable.
In seeking to overcome these problems, it has been common practice to make a small arms bullet from a steel core, enclosed in a gilding metal jacket.
This latter solution is practical, but results in a bullet having a relatively expensive construction. This is a very significant disadvantage since small arms ammunition is consumed in large quantities, and the market for such ammunition is highly competitive.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,693 there is disclosed a 7.62 mm bullet formed from a steel alloy, having a forward body portion whose diameter corresponds to that of the rifling lands of an associated gun, and a rearward body portion having a greater diameter, and provided with annular grooves. The body is provided with a coating which can be of copper. In use, the copper coating acts as a lubricant, and is less thick than the depth of the rifling. When fired from the rifled barrel, the rifling therefore cuts through the copper coating so that the steel body of the bullet is engraved by the rifling. In the disclosure it is stressed that the steel of the body must be soft, so as to permit this engraving to occur without undue barrel wear. The maximum value for the hardness of the steel body mentioned in the disclosure is 210 Brinell, which equates to a Vickers Hardness of 213, i.e. very much less than the desirable minimum value of 550 Vickers Hardness. As a result, the bullet disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,693 will lack the desirable hardened target penetration capability.
It would therefore be a considerable advantage if a way could be found to utilise steel or other metal having a Vickers Hardness equal to at least 550 (using a 10 kg load) as the principal component of a small arms projectile, while enabling the projectile to be engraved by the rifling and not introducing unacceptable friction or wear, and avoiding the expensive construction of applying a jacket to the projectile.
According to the present invention there is provided the combination of a gun having a rifled barrel and a round of ammunition; the rifling of the barrel comprising rifling grooves which are separated by lands extending helically along the length of the barrel; the round of ammunition comprising a projectile; the projectile having a body comprising a substantially cylindrical body, and at least one annular groove formed in and encircling the said substantially cylindrical body; the projectile further being provided with a coating of copper or copper alloy; wherein the body of the projectile is formed from a metal having a Vickers Hardness of not less than 550, and the coating is of a thickness not less than the depth of the said rifling grooves.
Normally, the projectile will also have an ogival nose portion of the body forward of said forward body portion, although other forms are possible.
The body of the projectile should normally have a diameter which is not greater than that defined by the roots of the grooves of the rifling. Upon engagement with the rifling the body is thus engraved, so that the material of the projectile is deformed, and thus engages with the lands, inducing spin in the projectile due to the twist of the rifling. This deformation gives the body an, interference fit with the rifling so as also to provide effective obturation by restricting or preventing the escape of propellant gases past the projectile via the rifling grooves. The length and precise diameter of the body should be designed with these factors in mind. Regard must also be taken to ensure that the force required to effect the engraving and to propel the projectile along the barrel is not excessive, and this is the reason why the diameter of the body should not normally be greater than that of the rifling groove. This force is substantially reduced by the said at least one annular groove formed in and encircling the body.
The depth of said at least one annular groove should preferably be between about 1% and 10% of the nominal diameter of the projectile, and an optimum design may be between 2% and 6%.
The material selected for the projectile body will depend partly upon the function which the projectile is to perform.
For a warshot ammunition nature to be used in combat conditions, steel is a suitable material, as it is inexpensive and can be readily formed into the desired shape, e.g. by a cold-forming process. Tungsten is another possible material because hardness is an important characteristic for target defeat, as are alloys of tungsten, and tungsten carbide.
The projectile is coated with copper or a copper alloy, which is more readily deformable than the material of the projectile body itself, and which may have a lower coefficient of friction. These factors can lead to a reduced engraving force with correspondingly lower barrel wear and higher muzzle velocity.
A coating thickness between 0.07 mm and 0.3 mm may be suitable. Such a coating could conveniently be applied by electroplating or by chemical deposition.
A coating thickness greater than 0.1 mm may be desirable.
Additionally, molybdenum disulphide may be applied as an outer coating, for example by a centrifugal deposition process.
The invention is particularly but not exclusively applicable to small arms weapons systems, having a nominal calibre of 20 mm or less, especially 9 mm or less.
The invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:—
As shown in
The projectile body is of elongate form and is cold formed from steel having a Vickers Hardness of at least 550 (using a 10 kg load). It can subsequently be given a heat treatment to provide the desired hardness or other physical properties. The projectile comprises a body portion 9 of substantially cylindrical form. The projectile also has a nose portion 10 forward of the portion 9, the nose portion 10 having an ogival forward end 11.
Because of the substantial hardness of the projectile body material, the projectile is highly effective at penetration of targets such as titanium/kevlar body armour. Moreover, the hardness also serves to minimise ablation of the projectile tip profile, thus further contributing to its effectiveness in target penetration, as well as stability in flight.
The body portion 9 comprises three parallel grooves 12 therein, which encircle the projectile, and the surface of the projectile is covered with a coating 13.
As shown in
The projectile is thus propelled down the gun barrel. The diameter of the body 9 and coating 13 together is greater that the diameter defined by the rifling lands 16 by an amount approximately half that of the deposited thickness of the coating 13 over the body 9.
When the body 9 and associated coating 13 passes from the gun chamber into the rifled part of the barrel, by virtue of its greater diameter, the body becomes engraved by the rifling 17. The diameter of the body 9 and coating 13 should preferably be substantially equal to or less than the diameter of the rifling grooves 18, while the grooves 12 can have substantially the same diameter as the barrel diameter.
The presence of the grooves 12 facilitates the necessary deformation of the coating 13, thus enabling the engraving to take place with a substantially reduced axial force. The fact that the coating 13 can deform into the grooves 12 contributes considerably to a dramatic reduction in the axial force required for engraving to occur.
The coating 13 is of a malleable material which can be copper or a copper alloy and could additionally comprise an outer layer of a low-friction material such as molybdenum disulphide. This coating 13 is of a thickness greater than the depth of the rifling grooves, and is of a relatively softer material than that of the projectile 1, it can also engrave more readily, and thus contribute for this reason also to a reduction in the engraving force required. Because the coating is thicker than the depth of rifling, engraving can take place entirely within the coating so that the hard metal of the projectile is kept substantially out of contact with the material forming the rifling of the gun barrel. Therefore, despite the hardness of the material forming the main part of the projectile body, barrel wear from this factor is minimised.
It will be evident to the skilled addressee that all of these factors reducing the engraving force will also result in reduced barrel wear, higher muzzle velocity, and hence increased lethality and accuracy.
The projectile which forms part of the combination of gun and ammunition tile according to the invention is also considerably less expensive to manufacture than a corresponding conventional projectile in, for example, a gilding metal jacket.
The optimum design parameters for the projectile according to the invention can be determined by those skilled in the art, based on the teaching contained herein.
The invention is particularly but not exclusively applicable to small arms ammunition. In one particular example, the invention has been successfully applied to 4.6 mm gun and ammunition. In a lodged bullet test, in which the force is measured which is required to dislodge a bullet which is stuck in the rifled section of a gun barrel, it has been found that a projectile made from steel having no reduced-diameter body portion 9 or suitable grooves into which a coating 13 can readily deform, would require an unacceptable axial force, with associated unacceptably high rate of barrel wear, and for this reason steel bullets, particularly those having considerable hardness, have not been considered practical hitherto.
A 4.6 mm projectile as described with reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0307272.5 | Mar 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/001111 | 3/16/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/16/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/085954 | 10/7/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
326231 | Manning | Sep 1885 | A |
711209 | Hill | Oct 1902 | A |
847149 | Barlow | Mar 1907 | A |
996820 | Wray | Jul 1911 | A |
1582673 | Fahrenwald | Apr 1926 | A |
3349711 | Darigo et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
4619203 | Habbe | Oct 1986 | A |
5686693 | Jakobsson | Nov 1997 | A |
6090756 | Brown | Jul 2000 | A |
6293203 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
D456480 | Quinsa et al. | Apr 2002 | S |
6374743 | Hug et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6439125 | Carter | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6973879 | McElroy et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
309293 | Jan 1920 | DE |
2839120 | Sep 1982 | DE |
2 511 497 | Feb 1983 | FR |
2540239 | Aug 1984 | FR |
697172 | Sep 1953 | GB |
WO 9900468 | Jan 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040244630 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |