6XXX aluminum alloys

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10190196
  • Patent Number
    10,190,196
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 16, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 29, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
New 6xxx aluminum alloys having an improved combination of properties are disclosed. The new 6xxx aluminum alloy generally include from 0.30 to 0.53 wt. % Si, from 0.50 to 0.65 wt. % Mg wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.0:1 (Mg:Si), from 0.05 to 0.24 wt. % Cu, from 0.05 to 0.14 wt. % Mn, from 0.05 to 0.25 wt. % Fe, up to 0.15 wt. % Ti, up to 0.15 wt. % Zn, up to 0.15 wt. % Zr, not greater than 0.04 wt. % V, and not greater than 0.04 wt. % Cr, the balance being aluminum and other elements.
Description
BACKGROUND

Aluminum alloys are useful in a variety of applications. However, improving one property of an aluminum alloy without degrading another property often proves elusive. For example, it is difficult to increase the strength of an alloy without decreasing its corrosion resistance. Other properties of interest for aluminum alloys include formability and critical fracture strain, to name two.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

Broadly, the present disclosure relates to new 6xxx aluminum alloys having an improved combination of properties, such as an improved combination of strength, critical fracture strain, formability, and/or corrosion resistance, among others.


Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloys have from 0.30 to 0.53 wt. % Si, from 0.50 to 0.65 wt. % Mg wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.0:1 (Mg:Si), from 0.05 to 0.24 wt. % Cu, from 0.05 to 0.14 wt. % Mn, from 0.05 to 0.25 wt. % Fe, up to 0.15 wt. % Ti, up to 0.15 wt. % Zn, up to 0.15 wt. % Zr, not greater than 0.04 wt. % V, and not greater than 0.04 wt. % Cr, the balance being aluminum and other elements.


The amount of silicon (Si) and magnesium (Mg) in the new 6xxx aluminum alloys may relate to the improved combination of properties (e.g., strength, crush properties). Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes from 0.30 to 0.53 wt. % Si. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.35 wt. % Si. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.375 wt. % Si. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.40 wt. % Si. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.425 wt. % Si. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.50 wt. % Si. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.475 wt. % Si. In one embodiment, a target amount of silicon in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 0.45 wt. % Si.


Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes from 0.50 to 0.65 wt. % Mg. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.525 wt. % Mg. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.55 wt. % Mg. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.575 wt. % Mg. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.625 wt. % Mg. In one embodiment, a target amount of magnesium in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 0.60 wt. % Mg.


Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes silicon and magnesium such that the wt. % of Mg is equal to or greater than the wt. % of Si, i.e., the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.0:1 (Mg:Si). In one embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.05:1(Mg:Si). In another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.10:1(Mg:Si). In yet another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.20:1(Mg:Si). In another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.30:1(Mg:Si). In one embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is not greater than 1.75:1(Mg:Si). In another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is not greater than 1.65:1(Mg:Si). In yet another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is not greater than 1.55:1(Mg:Si). In another embodiment, the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is not greater than 1.45:1(Mg:Si). In one embodiment, a target ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 1.33:1 (Mg:Si).


The amount of copper (Cu) in the new 6xxx aluminum alloys may relate to the improved combination of properties (e.g., corrosion resistance, strength). Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes from 0.05 to 0.24 wt. % Cu. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.22 wt. % Cu. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.20 wt. % Cu. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.19 wt. % Cu. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.17 wt. % Cu. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.07 wt. % Cu. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.09 wt. % Cu. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.11 wt. % Cu. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.13 wt. % Cu. In one embodiment, a target amount of copper in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 0.15 wt. % Cu.


The amount of manganese (Mn) in the new 6xxx aluminum alloys may relate to the improved combination of properties (e.g., formability, by controlling grain structure). Generally, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes from 0.05 to 0.14 wt. % Mn. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.06 wt. % Mn. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.07 wt. % Mn. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.08 wt. % Mn. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.13 wt. % Mn. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.12 wt. % Mn. In one embodiment, a target amount of manganese in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 0.10 wt. % Mn.


Iron (Fe) is generally included in the new 6xxx aluminum alloy as an impurity, and in the range of from 0.05 to 0.25 wt. % Fe. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.10 wt. % Fe. In another one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.15 wt. % Fe. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.225 wt. % Fe. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.20 wt. % Fe.


Titanium (Ti) may optionally be present in the new 6xxx aluminum alloy, such as for grain refining purposes. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.005 wt. % Ti. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.010 wt. % Ti. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes at least 0.0125 wt. % Ti. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.10 wt. % Ti. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.08 wt. % Ti. In yet another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.05 wt. % Ti. In one embodiment, a target amount of titanium in a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is 0.03 wt. % Ti.


Zinc (Zn) may optionally be included in the new alloy, and in an amount up to 0.15 wt. % Zn. Zinc may be present in scrap, and its removal may be costly. In one embodiment, a new alloy includes not greater than 0.10 wt. % Zn. In another embodiment, a new alloy includes not greater than 0.05 wt. % Zn.


Zirconium (Zr) may optionally be included in the new alloy, and in an amount up to 0.15 wt. % Zr. When present, zirconium may inhibit recrystallization. In one approach, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes 0.05-0.15 wt. % Zr. In another approach, zirconium is not purposefully used. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.10 wt. % Zr. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.05 wt. % Zr.


Both vanadium (V) and chromium (Cr) are preferentially avoided in the new 6xxx aluminum alloy. Such elements are costly and/or can form detrimental intermetallic particles in the new 6xxx aluminum alloy. Thus, the new 6xxx aluminum alloy generally includes not greater than 0.04 wt. % V and not greater than 0.04 wt. % Cr. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.03 wt. % V. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.02 wt. % V. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.03 wt. % Cr. In another embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy includes not greater than 0.02 wt. % Cr.


As noted above, the balance of the new aluminum alloy is aluminum and other elements. As used herein, “other elements” includes any elements of the periodic table other than the above-identified elements, i.e., any elements other than aluminum (Al), Si, Mg, Cu, Mn, Fe, Ti, Zn, Zr, V, and Cr. The new aluminum alloy may include not more than 0.10 wt. % each of any other element, with the total combined amount of these other elements not exceeding 0.30 wt. % in the new aluminum alloy. In one embodiment, each one of these other elements, individually, does not exceed 0.05 wt. % in the aluminum alloy, and the total combined amount of these other elements does not exceed 0.15 wt. % in the aluminum alloy. In another embodiment, each one of these other elements, individually, does not exceed 0.03 wt. % in the aluminum alloy, and the total combined amount of these other elements does not exceed 0.10 wt. % in the aluminum alloy.


Except where stated otherwise, the expression “up to” when referring to the amount of an element means that that elemental composition is optional and includes a zero amount of that particular compositional component. Unless stated otherwise, all compositional percentages are in weight percent (wt. %).


The new 6xxx aluminum alloy may be used in all wrought product forms. In one embodiment, a new 6xxx aluminum alloy is a rolled product. For example, the new 6xxx aluminum alloys may be produced in sheet form. In one embodiment, a sheet made from the new 6xxx aluminum alloy has a thickness of from 1.5 mm to 4.0 mm.


In one embodiment, the new 6xxx aluminum alloys are produced using ingot casting and hot rolling. In one embodiment, a method includes the steps of casting an ingot of the new 6xxx aluminum alloy, homogenizing the ingot, rolling the ingot into a rolled product having a final gauge (via hot rolling and/or cold rolling), solution heat treating the rolled product, wherein the solution heat treating comprises heating the rolled product to a temperature and for a time such that substantially all of Mg2Si of the rolled product is dissolved into solid solution, and after the solution heat treating, quenching the rolled product (e.g., cold water quenching). After the quenching, the rolled product may be artificially aged. In some embodiments, one or more anneal steps may be completed during the rolling (e.g., hot rolling to a first gauge, annealing, cold rolling to the final gauge). The artificially aged product can be painted (e.g., for an automobile part), and may thus be subjected to a paint-bake cycle. In one embodiment, the rolled aluminum alloy products produced from the new alloy may be incorporated in an automobile.


In another embodiment, the new 6xxx aluminum alloys products are cast via continuous casting. Downstream of the continuous casting, the product can be (a) rolled (hot and/or cold), (b) optionally annealed (e.g., between hot rolling and any cold rolling steps), (c) solution heat treated and quenched, (d) optionally cold worked (post-solution heat treatment), and (e) artificially aged, and all steps (a)-(e) may occur in-line or off-line relative to the continuous casting step. Some methods for producing the new 6xxx aluminum alloys products using continuous casting and associated downstream steps are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,825, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0000768, and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0366998, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The artificially aged product can be painted (e.g., for an automobile part), and may thus be subjected to a paint-bake cycle.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Example 1—Industrial Scale Testing

Two industrial scale ingots were cast (one invention and one comparison), then scalped, and then homogenized. The compositions of the ingots are provided in Table 1, below. The ingots were then hot rolled to an intermediate gauge, then annealed at 800° F. for 1 hour, and then cold rolled to final gauge (2.0 mm). The rolled products were then solution heat treated at a temperature and for a time such that substantially all of Mg2Si of the rolled product was dissolved into solid solution. The rolled products were then immediately cold water quenched, and then naturally aged and artificially aged for various periods, as described below. Mechanical properties were then tested, including tensile yield strength (TYS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), tensile elongation (T. Elong.), ultimate elongation (U. Elong.), and critical fracture strain (CFS), the results of which are shown in Tables 2-3. Mechanical properties including TYS, UTS, T. Elong. and U. Elong. were either tested in accordance with ASTM E8 and B557, or using a tapered version of the ASTM B557 specimen. Critical fracture strain (CFS) was derived from an engineering stress v. strain curve generated from the above described tests. Using the stress v. strain curve, the engineering strain at maximum load (εm), the engineering stress at maximum load (δm) and the engineering stress at the fracture load (δf) were determined and then entered into the following equation to provide the critical fracture strain (CFS):






CFS
=

-

ln


(



δ
f



/



δ
m




(

1
+

ɛ
m


)


1


/


2



)








The CFS may be multiplied by 100 to convert from units of strain to units of percent (%). Corrosion resistance per ASTM G110 was also measured, the results of which are shown in Table 4, below.









TABLE 1







Composition of Alloys of Example 1

















Ingot
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Zn
Ti
V
Mg:Si





1 (Inv.)
0.43
0.19
0.14
0.096
0.61
0.032
0.013
0.019
0.009
1.40


2 (Comp.)
0.81
0.19
0.14
0.143
0.71
0.032
0.013
0.019
0.009
0.88
















TABLE 2







Mechanical Properties of Alloy 1 (Invention) of Example 1















Natural
Artificial
Artificial

TYS
UTS
U.
T.



Age
Age Temp
Age Time

ksi
ksi
Elong.
Elong.
CFS


Interval
(° F.)
(hours)
Direction
(MPa)
(MPa)
(%)
(%)
(%)


















 1 month
None
None
L
  15.7
   25.92
20.8
26.6
28.1






(108)
(179)





LT
  15.1
   25.035
19.5
24.6
29.4






(104)
(173)





45
  15.5
   25.785
23.0
29.9
26.2






(107)
(178)


 3 months
300
8
L
  27.3
  37.1
14.6
21.0
31.2






(188)
(256)





LT
  25.7
  35.7
15.7
21.0
23.7






(177)
(246)





45
  26.0
  36.0
16.4
21.4
22.9






(180)
(248)


 3 months
315
8
L
  31.0
  39.2
13.0
18.6
23.9






(214)
(270)





LT
  29.5
  37.8
13.5
19.8
27.7






(204)
(261)





45
  29.8
  38.1
14.1
20.0
21.1






(205)
(262)


35 days
356
8
LT
  34.6
  38.5
7.9
9.9
30.8






(239)
(266)
















TABLE 3







Mechanical Properties of Alloy 2 (Comparison) of Example 1















Natural
Artificial
Artificial



U.
T.



Age
Age Temp
Age Time

TYS
UTS
Elong.
Elong.
CFS


Interval
(° F.)
(hours)
Direction
ksi
ksi
(%)
(%)
(%)





 30 days
None
None
L
22.9
37.2
20.8
26.2
23.1





LT
21.6
35.8
20.9
26.5
19.1





45
21.9
36.3
23.3
28.4
21.4


182 days
356
2
LT
38.4
46.2
13.2
18.2
13.2
















TABLE 4







Corrosion Resistance of Example 1 Alloys









24 hours - ASTM G110



Max depth of attack (μm)














Alloy
Condition
1
2
3
4
5
Ave.

















1 (Inv.)
As
0
30
0
0
0
6



Fabricated


1 (Inv.)
45 mins. @
0
39
43
0
0
16



195° C.


2 (Comp.)
As
0
15
0
0
0
3



Fabricated


2 (Comp.)
45 mins. @
36
15
32
20
29
26



195° C.









As shown, the invention alloy (alloy 1) achieved improved properties over the comparison alloy (alloy 2). Specifically, with reference to tables 2 and 3, invention alloy 1 achieved improved critical fracture strain (CFS) over comparison alloy 2. For example, comparison alloy 2 after 30 days of natural aging and no artificial aging realized a CFS value of about 19% in the LT direction. In contrast, invention alloy 1 achieved improved critical fracture strain, realizing a CFS value of about 29% in the LT direction after 1 month of natural aging and no artificial aging. As another example, comparison alloy 2 after 182 days of natural aging and 2 hours of artificial aging at 356° F. realized a CFS value of about 13% the LT direction. In contrast, invention alloy 1 again achieved improved critical fracture strain, realizing a CFS value of about 28% in the LT direction after 3 months of natural aging and 8 hours of artificial aging at 315° F. Thus, the invention alloy achieved improved critical fracture strain (CFS) in the aged condition.


Higher critical fracture strain (CFS) values may correlate with improved crush properties. For example, a material (e.g., an aluminum alloy) which realizes a higher CFS value may also generally realize improved resistance to cracking in the tight folds of the material that may occur as a result of a crushing force. In one embodiment, alloys realizing a CFS value of at least 20% may be resistant to cracking (e.g., no cracking) in the tight folds produced by a crushing force.


As shown in table 4, invention alloy 1 achieved improved corrosion resistance over comparison alloy 2 after both alloys were artificially aged. For example, comparison alloy 2 after artificial aging for 45 minutes at 195° C. realized an average depth of attack of 26 μm. In contrast, invention alloy 1 achieved improved corrosion resistance, realizing an average depth of attack of 16 μm after artificial aging for 45 minutes at 195° C., and with corrosion resistance occurring at only 2 sites (sites 2 and 3). Thus, the invention alloy achieved an improved combination of, for instance, critical fracture strain and corrosion resistance.


Example 2—Additional Industrial Scale Testing

An additional invention alloy ingot (alloy 3) was cast as an ingot, the composition of which is shown in Table 5, below.









TABLE 5







Composition of Example 2 Alloy

















Ingot
Si
Fe
Cu
Mn
Mg
Cr
Zn
Ti
Ni
Mg:Si





3 (Inv.)
0.44
0.18
0.14
0.10
0.60
0.02
0.02
0.02

1.36









After casting, the alloy 3 ingot was scalped, and then homogenized. The ingot was then hot rolled to an intermediate gauge, then annealed at 800° F. for 1 hour, and then cold rolled to two different final gauges of 2.0 mm (0.0787 inch) and 3.0 mm (0.118 inch). The rolled products were then solution heat treated at a temperature and for a time such that substantially all of Mg2Si of the rolled product was dissolved into solid solution. The rolled products were then immediately cold water quenched, and then naturally aged for about two months. The rolled products were then artificially aged at various temperatures for about 27 hours. Some of the rolled products were then stretched about 2% while others of the rolled products were not stretched. Various ones of the products (both stretched and un-stretched) were then subjected to a simulated paint bake for 20 minutes at either 180° C. (356° F.) at 185° C. (365° F.). The mechanical properties of the rolled products were then tested. The processing conditions for the various alloys are provided in Table 6, below. The mechanical properties are provided in Table 7, below.









TABLE 6







Post-Rolling Processing Conditions for Example 2 Alloys















Simulated



Final
Artificially Aging Temp.

Paint


Alloy
Gauge (mm)
° C./(° F.) for ~27 hours
Stretch
Bake





3A-1
2.0
146.1/(295)
None
None


3A-2
2.0
137.8/(280)
None
None


3A-3
3.0
146.1/(295)
None
None


3A-4
3.0
137.8/(280)
None
None


3B-1
2.0
146.1/(295)
None
20 mins. at






180° C.


3B-2
2.0
137.8/(280)
None
20 mins. at






180° C.


3B-3
3.0
146.1/(295)
None
20 mins. at






180° C.


3B-4
3.0
137.8/(280)
None
20 mins. at






180° C.


3C-1
2.0
146.1/(295)
2%
20 mins. at






180° C.


3C-2
2.0
137.8/(280)
2%
20 mins. at






180° C.


3C-3
3.0
146.1/(295)
2%
20 mins. at






180° C.


3C-4
3.0
137.8/(280)
2%
20 mins. at






180° C.


3D-1
2.0
146.1/(295)
2%
20 mins. at






185° C.


3D-2
2.0
137.8/(280)
2%
20 mins. at






185° C.


3D-3
3.0
146.1/(295)
2%
20 mins. at






185° C.


3D-4
3.0
137.8/(280)
2%
20 mins. at






185° C.
















TABLE 7







Mechanical Properties of Example 2 Alloys















Final



U.
T.




Gauge

TYS
UTS
Elong.
Elong.
CFS


Alloy
(mm)
Direction
(MPa)
(MPa)
(%)
(%)
(%)

















3A-1
2.0
L
227
285
13.3
18.8
22.5


3A-1
2.0
LT
219
275
13.8
19.3
26.8


3A-1
2.0
45
220
276
14.2
20.3
20.8


3A-2
2.0
L
205
272
14.9
22.0
29.5


3A-2
2.0
LT
197
263
15.6
21.5
27.2


3A-2
2.0
45
198
263
16.4
21.6
22.6


3A-3
3.0
L
228
283
13.4
19.8
27.1


3A-3
3.0
LT
222
276
13.6
20.4
27.8


3A-3
3.0
45
223
276
14.0
21.0
21.2


3A-4
3.0
L
208
272
14.6
20.7
27.5


3A-4
3.0
LT
202
264
15.0
21.7
28.8


3A-4
3.0
45
203
266
16.0
22.4
22.7


3B-1
2.0
LT
218
271
13.3
18.9
24.8


3B-2
2.0
LT
200
260
14.0
19.7
24.1


3B-3
3.0
LT
221
272
12.8
19.8
26.5


3B-4
3.0
LT
206
263
13.5
20.3
27.2


3C-1
2.0
LT
245
279
11.4
16.7
25.4


3C-2
2.0
LT
234
274
12.4
18.2
32.2


3C-3
3.0
LT
248
280
11.2
17.7
29.7


3C-4
3.0
LT
238
275
11.6
19.3
28.8


3D-1
2.0
LT
247
278
10.8
16.8
30.9


3D-2
2.0
LT
236
273
11.6
17.4
27.2


3D-3
3.0
LT
249
280
10.6
18.2
29.2


3D-4
3.0
LT
240
276
11.4
18.2
28.0









As shown, the invention alloy realized an unexpectedly improved combination of strength, ductility and crush resistance. As shown, the invention alloy realized high CFS values (e.g., above 20%) for both the 2.0 mm and the 3.0 mm products. Further the CFS values were not negatively impacted by the application of the simulated paint bake (with or without 2% stretch), and thus would still be expected to show good cracking resistance upon application of a crushing force.


While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product consisting of: 0.30-0.53 wt. % Si;0.50-0.65 wt. % Mg; wherein a ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.05:1 (Mg:Si);0.05-0.24 wt. % Cu;0.05-0.14 wt. % Mn;0.05-0.25 wt. % Fe;up to 0.15 wt. % Ti;up to 0.15 wt. % Zn;up to 0.15 wt. % Zr;not greater than 0.04 wt. % V;not greater than 0.04 wt. % Cr;the balance being aluminum and other elements, wherein each of the other elements does not exceed 0.10 wt. % in the recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product, wherein a total of the other elements is not more than 0.30 wt. % in the recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product;wherein the recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product is a sheet product; andwherein the recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product realizes a typical long-transverse (LT) tensile yield strength of at least 200 MPa and a critical fracture strain (CFS) of at least 25% in an artificially aged condition.
  • 2. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having 0.35-0.50 wt. % Si.
  • 3. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having 0.40-0.50 wt. % Si.
  • 4. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having 0.55-0.65 wt. % Mg.
  • 5. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1, wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.10:1.
  • 6. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1, wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.20:1.
  • 7. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1, wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is at least 1.30:1.
  • 8. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1, wherein the ratio of wt. % Mg to wt. % Si is not greater than 1.75:1.
  • 9. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.22 wt. % Cu.
  • 10. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.20 wt. % Cu.
  • 11. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.19 wt. % Cu.
  • 12. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having at least 0.07 wt. % Cu.
  • 13. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having at least 0.09 wt. % Cu.
  • 14. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having at least 0.11 wt. % Cu.
  • 15. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having 0.06-0.13 wt. % Mn.
  • 16. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having 0.07-0.12 wt. % Mn.
  • 17. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.03 wt. % each of V and Cr.
  • 18. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.02 wt. % V.
  • 19. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1 having not greater than 0.02 wt. % Cr.
  • 20. The recrystallized 6xxx aluminum alloy product of claim 1, wherein the sheet product has a thickness of from 1.5 mm to 4.0 mm.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This patent application claims benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/929,673, filed Jan. 21, 2014, entitled “6XXX Aluminum Alloys”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
3717512 Gullotti et al. Feb 1973 A
4065326 Nicoud Dec 1977 A
4256488 Livak Mar 1981 A
4525326 Schwellinger et al. Jun 1985 A
4605448 Baba et al. Aug 1986 A
4637842 Jeffrey et al. Jan 1987 A
5690758 Oh et al. Nov 1997 A
6267922 Bull et al. Jul 2001 B1
6361741 Klemp et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375767 Parson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6440359 Parson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6565679 Jeffrey et al. May 2003 B1
6630037 Sawada et al. Oct 2003 B1
7182825 Unal et al. Feb 2007 B2
20010037844 Bekki et al. Nov 2001 A1
20040079457 Kimura et al. Apr 2004 A1
20050000609 Butler, Jr. Jan 2005 A1
20080318081 Steins Dec 2008 A1
20090116999 Furu et al. May 2009 A1
20120055591 Kamat et al. Mar 2012 A1
20140000768 Sawtell et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140017116 Lin Jan 2014 A1
20140366998 Kamat et al. Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
103131904 Jun 2013 CN
2156945 Feb 2010 EP
11-310841 Nov 1999 JP
2000-345272 Dec 2000 JP
2002-105573 Apr 2002 JP
2008-019483 Jan 2008 JP
2009-041045 Feb 2009 JP
2010-116591 May 2010 JP
2012-1756 Jan 2012 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
ANSI H35.1/ H35.1(M)-2009 (Revision of ANSI H35.I / H35.1(M)-2006), “American National Standard Alloy and Temper Designation Systems for Aluminum,” pp. 1-11, The Aluminum Association (2009).
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 21, 2015, from corresponding, co-owned International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/011815.
Rack, H. J., et al., “Thermomechanical Treatment of High Purity 6061 Aluminum” Metallurgical Transactions A 8A:335-346, Feb. 1977.
Registration Record Series Teal Sheets, International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys, The Aluminum Association, pp. 1-27, Feb. 2009.
Registration Record Series Teal Sheets, International Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Wrought Aluminum and Wrought Aluminum Alloys—New Alloys, The Aluminum Association, Addendum, Feb. 2014, 3 pages.
First Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2017, from related Chinese Patent Application No. CN201580005362.2.
Supplemental European Search Report, dated Oct. 5, 2017, from corresponding European Patent Application No. 15740588.7.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150203942 A1 Jul 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61929673 Jan 2014 US