A low-cost rare earth magnet and corresponding manufacturing method thereof

Abstract
The disclosure relates to the technical field of sintered type NdFeB permanent magnets, in particular to a low-cost rare earth magnet and manufacturing method. There is provided a method of preparing a high-coercivity, sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium comprising the following steps:
Description
CROSS-REFERENCETO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is based on Chinese Patent Application No. 202111121731.8,filed Sep. 24, 2021,which claims the benefit of priority to the Chinese Patent Application, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates to the technical field of sintered type NdFeB permanent magnets, in particular to a low-cost rare earth magnet and a corresponding manufacturing method thereof.


BACKGROUND

NdFeB sintered permanent magnets are widely used in high-tech fields such as electronic equipment, medical equipment, electric vehicles, household products, robots, etc. In the past few decades of development, NdFeB permanent magnets have been rapidly developed, and have become an indispensable functional component in industrial applications.


Heavy rare earths terbium (Tb) or Dysprosium (Dy) are added for greatly improving the magnetic coercivity of the NdFeB magnets. According to one conventional manufacturing process, Tb or Dy are directly mixed into the magnet alloy powders, but consume large amounts of Tb or Dy thereby significantly increasing the material costs. According to an improved manufacturing process, the amount of Tb or Dy can be greatly reduced by applying the grain boundary diffusion technology, but still the material costs are very high for the heavy rare earths. Therefore, it is still important to continuously reduce the total content of heavy rare earths in the NdFeB magnet.


Furthermore, the world market price for high abundance cerium (Ce) is much cheaper than the for neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr) or alloys thereof, Increasing the proportion of Ce in the magnet alloy may therefore significantly reduce the cost of NdFeB magnets. But replacing the elements Nd or Pr by Ce may reduce the performance of the NdFeB magnet.


One way to introduce Ce into the magnet is to diffuse and age a special Ce-containing diffusion source. However, the high temperature resistance of Ce-containing magnets is poor due to its special grain boundary structure.


CN108417380A discloses Ce-containing magnets being formed by diffusion coating of Ce),(LREaHRE1-a)yM100-x-y, wherein 0<x≤20 and 15≤y≤99.9, and 15<x+y≤99.9 and 0≤a≤1.0; LRE is one or more of La, Pr, Nd and Y; HRE is one or more of Tb, Dy and Ho; and M is one or more of Al, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ag, Pb, Bi and Sn.


CN111640549A discloses that cobalt-containing amorphous grain boundaries could improve the magnetic performance. However, there are no low melting point diffusion sources and due to the poor high-temperature resistance the magnetic performance of the NdFeB magnet may be reduced.


SUMMARY

The disclosure is defined by the appended claims. The description that follows is subjected to this limitation. Any disclosure lying outside the scope of said claims is only intended for illustrative as well as comparative purposes.


According to the present disclosure, there is provided a method of preparing a high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium as defined in claim 1. The method comprises the following steps:


(S1) Providing alloy flakes composed of RxT(1-x-y-x)ByMz wherein


R is at least one of Nd, Pr, Ho, and Gd;


T is at least one of Fe and Co; and


M is at least one of Mg, Ti, Zr, Nb, and Mo; and


x, y, and z are 28.0wt %≤x≤33.0wt %, 0.8wt %≤y≤1.2wt %, and 0wt %≤z≤3.0wt %;

    • (S2) mixing the alloy flakes, a low melting point powder, and a lubricant, then subjecting the mixture to a hydrogen embrittlement process followed in this order by pulverizing the process product to an alloy powder by jet milling, magnetic field orientation molding of the alloy powder to obtain a blank, sintering and aging treatment the blank, and cutting the obtained sintered NdFeB magnet into the desired shape, wherein the low melting point powder is at least one of CeαAl100-α with 90≤α≤99, CeβCu1-β with 80≤β≤99 and CeγGa1-βwith 80≤γ≤99 and wherein a content of the Ce in the mixture is in the range of 1 to 10 wt % based on a total weight of the alloy flakes and the low melting point powder;
    • (S3) coating a film composed of a diffusion source of formula R1xR2yHzM1-x-y-z on the sintered NdFeB magnet, wherein
    • R1 is at least one element of Nd and Pr;
    • R2 is at least one element of Ho and Gd;
    • H is at least one element of Tb and Dy;
    • M is at least two elements of Al, Cu, Ga, Ti, Co, Mg, Zn, and Sn; and
    • x, y, and z are 5.0wt % <x<50.0wt %, 0wt % <y≤15.0wt %, and 30.0wt % ≤z≤90.0wt %; and


(S4) Performing a diffusion heat treatment so as to diffuse the diffusion source into the sintered NdFeB magnet, followed by aging the sintered NdFeB magnet to obtain the low-cost rare earth magnet.


Another aspect of the present disclosure refers to a high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium obtained by the above-mentioned preparation method.


Further embodiments of the present disclosure could be learned from the dependent claims and the following description.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments. The present disclosure, however, may be embodied in various different forms, and should not be construed as being limited to only the illustrated embodiments herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided as examples so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the aspects and features of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art.


General Concept

There is provided a method of preparing a high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium comprising the following steps:


(S1) Providing alloy flakes composed of RxT(1-x-y-z)ByMz wherein


R is at least one of Nd, Pr, Ho, and Gd;


T is at least one of Fe and Co; and


M is at least one of Al, Mg, Ti, Zr, Nb, and Mo; and


x, y, and z are 28.0wt % ≤x≤33.0wt %, 0.8wt % ≤y≤1.2wt %, and 0wt % ≤z≤3.0wt %, in particular 0.1wt % ≤x≤1.0wt %;


(S2) Mixing the alloy flakes, a low melting point powder, and a lubricant, then subjecting the mixture to a hydrogen embrittlement process followed in this order by pulverizing the process product to an alloy powder by jet milling, magnetic field orientation molding of the alloy powder to obtain a blank, sintering and aging treatment the blank, and cutting the obtained sintered NdFeB magnet into the desired shape, wherein the low melting point powder is at least one of CeαAl100-α with 90≤α≤99, CeβCu1-β with 80≤β≤99, and CeγGa1-γ with 80≤γ≤99 and wherein a content of the Ce in the mixture is in the range of 1 to 10 wt %, in particular 2 to 8 wt %, based on a total weight of the alloy flakes and the low melting point powder;


(S3) Coating a film composed of a diffusion source of formula R1xR2yHzM1-x-y-z on the sintered NdFeB magnet, wherein


R1 is at least one element of Nd and Pr;


R2 is at least one element of Ho and Gd;


H is at least one element of Tb and Dy;


M is at least two elements of Al, Cu, Ga, Ti, Co, Mg, Zn, and Sn; and


x, y, and z are 5.0wt % <x <50.0wt %, in particular 10.0wt % x≤45.0wt %, 0wt % <y≤15.0wt %, in particular 5wt % ≤y≤10.0wt %, and 30.0wt % -≤z≤90.0wt %, in particular 40.0wt % ≤z≤70.0wt %; and


(S4) Performing a diffusion heat treatment so as to diffuse the diffusion source into the sintered NdFeB magnet, followed by aging the sintered NdFeB magnet to obtain the low-cost rare earth magnet.


According to an embodiment, the hydrogen embrittlement process in step S2 comprises a hydrogen absorption step and a dehydrogenation step, the hydrogen absorption step is performed at a temperature in the range of 100 to 300° C. and the dehydrogenation step is performed at a temperature in the range of 400 to 600° C. During the hydrogen absorption step, the content of hydrogen content may be less than 1000 ppm, and the content of oxygen may be less than 500 ppm.


According to another embodiment, in step S2, an average particle size D50 of the low melting point powders is 200 nm-4 μm and an average particle size D50 of the NdFeB powder after jet milling is 3-5 μm. The average particle diameter D50 of the particles may be measured by laser diffraction (LD). The method may be performed according to ISO 13320-1. According to the IUPAC definition, the equivalent diameter of a non-spherical particle is equal to a diameter of a spherical particle that exhibits identical properties to that of the investigated non-spherical particle.


According to another embodiment, in step S2, a sintering temperature of NdFeB magnets is 980-1060° C. and a sintering time is 6-15 h. Further, the aging may include a primary aging step at 850° C. for 3 h and a secondary aging step at 450-660° C. for 3 h.


According to the preparation method, the NdFeB magnet is machined into corresponding size and is coated with diffusion source, then diffused and aged.


The diffusion source may be produced by atomized milling or ingot casting.


According to another embodiment, in step S4, a diffusion temperature is 850-930° C. for a diffusion time of 6-30 h and an aging temperature is 420-680° C. for an aging time of 3-10 h. A heating rate to the aging temperature may be 1-5° C./min and a cooling rate may be 5-20° C./min.


A high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet will be obtained by the process.


The diffusion source is a low-heavy rare earth alloy diffusion source, which contains elements Ho and Gd that can increase the high temperature resistance of the magnet. That is, the diffusion source can greatly improve the coercive force of the magnet and make the magnet have high temperature resistance. In addition, the coercivity of the magnet is greatly increased with less heavy rare earth. The coercivity increase after diffusion of a Dy alloy can reach 636.8-835.8kA/m, which is comparable to the diffusion effect of pure Tb metal. The magnet has high temperature resistance and the production costs of the magnet may be greatly reduced. The heavy rare earths shell of Dy or Tb and Ho or Gd has a deep extension and the grain boundary structures all have good high temperature resistance.


The combination of diffusion source and magnet composition including Ce can greatly increase the diffusion depth of heavy rare earths, and form a double-shell or even three-shell structure of heavy rare earth Dy or Tb and Ho or Gd. The formation of deep diffusion heavy rare earths Dy or Tb and Ho or Gd double-shell or even tri-shell structures and grain boundary structures can be well tolerated at high temperatures.


The present disclosure allows improve the high temperature resistance and, at the same time, reduce the content of heavy rare earths in the magnet. The process is simple and enables mass production. In summary, the process allows to greatly reduce the costs for high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnets.


EXAMPLES

In the following, compositions, preparation conditions and magnetic characteristics of Examples 1-28 and Comparative Example 1-7 are described in detail.


The general preparation process is as follows:


(1) NdFeB alloy raw materials are smelted in a strip casting process to obtain NdFeB alloy sheets and the NdFeB alloy sheets are mechanically crushed into NdFeB alloy flakes of about 150-400 μm particle size.


(2) Low melting point powders of CeAl, CeCu and CeGa with a particle size in the range of 200 nm-4 μm were added to the NdFeB alloy flakes and mixed therewith. The low melting point alloy powders are coated on the NdFeB alloy flakes. NdFeB alloy flakes can be evenly mixed in a mixer with the low melting point powders. Preferably, lubricants may be added.


CeAl means CeαAl100-α with 90≤α≤99, CeCu means CeβCu1-β with 80≤β≤99, and CeGa means CeγGa1-γ with 80≤γ≤99.


(3) The mixed materials are put into the hydrogen treatment furnace for hydrogen absorption and dehydrogenation treatment, wherein hydrogen absorption is performed at 100-300° C. and the dehydrogenation temperature is 400-600° C. Starting from the product of the hydrogen embrittlement process, NdFeB powders are prepared by jet milling. The NdFeB powders have an average particle size in the range of 3-5 μm. The composition of the obtained NdFeB powders are summarized in Table 1.


(4) After air flow grinding the NdFeB alloy powder magnetic field orientation moldingand pressing into the blank by isostatic pressure is performed.


(5) The obtained blank is sintered in vacuum, and quickly cooled down by argon. Then the sintered blank is treated under primary aging and secondary aging conditions. Furthermore, the magnet performance of the obtained sintered NdFeB magnet is tested. The specific process conditions and magnet characteristics are shown in Table 2.


(6) The sintered NdFeB magnet is mechanically processed to make the desired shape, and then a diffusion source film is coated on both sides of the sample perpendicular to the C axis. The amount of the diffusion source film being coated on the sintered NdFeB magnet is set to be such that the weight percentage of Dy is 1.0% based on a total weight of the sintered NdFeB magnet and the diffusion source film. The specific process conditions of the diffusion process the diffusion sources and magnet characteristics of the obtained high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnets are summarized in Table 3. The composition values of the diffusion source compounds refer to percentages by weight (for example, Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5=20wt % Pr, 5wt % Ho, 55wt % Dy, 15wt % Cu, and 5wt % Mg).









TABLE 1







Composition of NdFeB alloy flakes and low melting point powders


Composition of NdFeB alloy powder after jet milling wt %



















Number
Al
B
Co
Cu
Fe
Ga
Nd
Pr
Ti
Ce
Gd
TRE





Comparative
0.30%
0.97%
1.00%
0.15%
Margin
0.05%
29.02%



0.5%
29.52%


Example 1














Example 1
0.30%
0.97%
1.00%
0.15%
Margin
0.05%
27.02%


2.00%
0.5%
29.52%


Example 2
0.30%
0.97%
1.00%
0.15%
Margin
0.05%
25.02%


4.00%
0.5%
29.52%


Example 3
0.30%
0.97%
1.00%
0.15%
Margin
0.05%
23.02%


6.00%
0.5%
29.52%


Example 4
0.30%
0.97%
1.00%
0.15%
Margin
0.05%
21.02%


8.00%
0.5%
29.52%


Comparative
0.41%
0.92%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.10%
26.35%
6.59%
0.05%


32.94%


Example 2














Example 5
0.41%
0.92%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.10%
24.75%
6.19%
0.05%
2.00%

32.94%


Example 6
0.41%
0.92%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.10%
23.15%
5.79%
0.05%
4.00%

32.94%


Example 7
0.41%
0.92%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.10%
21.55%
5.39%
0.05%
6.00%

32.94%


Example 8
0.41%
0.92%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.10%
19.95%
4.99%
0.05%
8.00%

32.94%


Comparative
0.53%
0.95%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.11%
24.74%
6.19%
0.06%


30.93%


Example 3














Example 9
0.53%
0.95%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.11%
23.14%
5.78%
0.06%
2.00%

30.93%


Example 10
0.53%
0.95%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.11%
21.54%
5.39%
0.06%
4.00%

30.93%


Example 11
0.53%
0.95%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.11%
19.94%
4.99%
0.06%
6.00%

30.93%


Example 12
0.53%
0.95%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.11%
18.34%
4.59%
0.06%
8.00%

30.93%


Comparative
0.82%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.11%
23.86%
7.95%
0.10%


31.81%


Example 4














Example 13
0.82%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.11%
22.36%
7.45%
0.10%
2.00%

31.81%


Example 14
0.82%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.11%
20.86%
6.95%
0.10%
4.00%

31.81%


Example 15
0.82%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.11%
19.36%
6.45%
0.10%
6.00%

31.81%


Example 16
0.82%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.11%
17.86%
5.95%
0.10%
8.00%

31.81%


Comparative
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.32%
23.71%
7.90%
0.20%


31.61%


Example 5














Example 17
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.32%
22.21%
7.40%

2.00%

31.61%


Example 18
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.32%
20.71%
6.90%

4.00%

31.61%


Example 19
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.32%
19.21%
6.40%

6.00%

31.61%


Example 20
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.29%
Margin
0.32%
17.71%
5.90%

8.00%

31.61%


Comparative
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.21%
31.02%

0.20%

0.5%
31.52%


Example 6














Example 21
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.21%
29.02%

0.20%
2.00%
0.5%
31.52%


Example 22
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.21%
27.02%

0.20%
4.00%
0.5%
31.52%


Example 23
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.21%
25.02%

0.20%
6.00%
0.5%
31.52%


Example 24
0.53%
0.94%
1.00%
0.44%
Margin
0.21%
23.02%

0.20%
8.00%
0.5%
31.52%


Comparative
0.05%
0.92%
0.90%
0.16%
Margin
0.20%
22.50%
7.50%
0.10%


30.00%


Example 7














Example 25
0.05%
0.92%
0.90%
0.16%
Margin
0.20%
22.40%
5.60%
0.10%
2.00%

30.00%


Example 26
0.05%
0.92%
0.90%
0.16%
Margin
0.20%
20.80%
5.20%
0.10%
4.00%

30.00%


Example 27
0.05%
0.92%
0.90%
0.16%
Margin
0.20%
19.20%
4.80%
0.10%
6.00%

30.00%


Example 28
0.05%
0.92%
0.90%
0.16%
Margin
0.20%
17.60%
4.40%
0.10%
8.00%

30.00%
















TABLE 2







Preparation process conditions and magnet characteristics of the sintered


NdFeB magnets



















Sintering
holding
Primary
holding
Secondary
holding
Heating
Cooling






temp.
time
aging
time
aging
time
rate
rate
Br
Hcj
Hk/


Number
° C.
h
° C.
h
° C.
h
° C./min
° C./min
T
kA/m
Hcj





















Comparative
980
15
850
3
450
3
5
5
1.46
1137.5
0.99


Example 1













Example 1
980
15
850
3
450
3
5
5
1.43
1002.2
0.98


Example 2
980
15
850
3
450
3
5
5
1.43
875.6
0.98


Example 3
980
15
850
3
450
3
5
5
1.42
732.3
0.98


Example 4
980
15
850
3
450
3
5
5
1.36
700.5
0.98


Comparative
980
15
850
3
480
3
3
15
1.37
1312.6
0.98


Example 2













Example 5
980
15
850
3
480
3
3
15
1.34
1162.2
0.98


Example 6
980
15
850
3
480
3
3
15
1.34
1050.7
0.98


Example 7
980
15
850
3
480
3
3
15
1.34
907.4
0.98


Example 8
980
15
850
3
480
3
3
15
1.27
875.6
0.98


Comparative
1020
13
850
3
480
3
3
20
1.40
1285.5
0.97


Example 3













Example 9
1020
13
850
3
480
3
3
20
1.37
1142.3
0.98


Example 10
1020
13
850
3
480
3
3
20
1.37
1026.8
0.98


Example 11
1020
13
850
3
480
3
3
20
1.36
891.5
0.98


Example 12
1020
13
850
3
480
3
3
20
1.30
851.7
0.98


Comparative
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
10
1.35
1504.4
0.98


Example 4













Example 13
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
10
1.32
1369.1
0.98


Example 14
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
10
1.32
1241.8
0.98


Example 15
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
10
1.31
1114.4
0.98


Example 16
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
10
1.25
1074.6
0.98


Comparative
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
15
1.38
1394.6
0.98


Example 5













Example 17
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
15
1.35
1249.7
0.98


Example 18
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
15
1.35
1146.2
0.98


Example 19
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
15
1.34
995.0
0.98


Example 20
1040
9
850
3
550
3
5
15
1.29
955.2
0.98


Comparative
1060
6
850
3
580
3
1
20
1.38
1347.6
0.97


Example 6













Example 21
1060
6
850
3
580
3
1
20
1.35
1209.9
0.98


Example 22
1060
6
850
3
580
3
1
20
1.35
1098.5
0.98


Example 23
1060
6
850
3
580
3
1
20
1.34
955.2
0.98


Example 24
1060
6
850
3
580
3
1
20
1.28
915.4
0.98


Comparative
1050
12
850
3
660
3
1
5
1.44
1212.3
0.99


Example 7













Example 25
1050
12
850
3
660
3
1
5
1.41
1077.0
0.98


Example 26
1050
12
850
3
660
3
1
5
1.39
971.1
0.98


Example 27
1050
12
850
3
660
3
1
5
1.38
983.1
0.98


Example 28
1050
12
850
3
660
3
1
5
1.35
925.7
0.98
















TABLE 3







Diffusion sources, process conditions and characteristics of the sintered NdFeB


magnets after diffusion
























Heating
Cooling
Performance after





Size
Diffusion
holding
Aging
holding
rate
rate
Diffusion





















Diffusion
(mm)
Temp.
time
Temp.
time
° C./
° C./


Hk/



Number
Source
mm
° C.
h
° C.
h
min
min
Br
Hcj
Hcj
βHcj150° C.






















Comparative
Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5
10*10*3
850
30
420
10
5
5
1.432
1950.2
0.97
0.520%


Example 1














Example 1
Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5
10*10*3
850
30
420
10
5
5
1.408
1926.3
0.96
0.521%


Example 2
Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5
10*10*3
850
30
420
10
5
5
1.406
1767.1
0.97



Example 3
Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5
10*10*3
850
30
420
10
5
5
1.401
1631.8
0.97



Example 4
Pr20Ho5Dy55Cu15Mg5
10*10*3
850
30
420
10
5
5
1.340
1592.0
0.97



Comparative
Nd20Ho10Dy50Cu5Co15
10*10*4
880
20
500
6
3
15
1.340
2117.4
0.96
0.490%


Example 2














Example 5
Nd20Ho10Dy50Cu5Co15
10*10*4
880
20
500
6
3
15
1.315
2077.6
0.97
0.495%


Example 6
Nd20Ho10Dy50Cu5Co15
10*10*4
880
20
500
6
3
15
1.313
1934.3
0.97



Example 7
Nd20Ho10Dy50Cu5Co15
10*10*4
880
20
500
6
3
15
1.310
1830.8
0.97



Example 8
Nd20Ho10Dy50Cu5Co15
10*10*4
880
20
500
6
3
15
1.250
1775.1
0.97



Comparative
Pr30Gd5Dy40Cu15Zn10
10*10*4
900
15
450
8
3
20
1.370
2069.6
0.96
0.495%


Example 3














Example 9
Pr30Gd5Dy40Cu15Zn10
10*10*4
900
15
450
8
3
20
1.345
2029.8
0.97
0.497%


Example 10
Pr30Gd5Dy40Cu15Zn10
10*10*4
900
15
450
8
3
20
1.341
1926.3
0.97



Example 11
Pr30Gd5Dy40Cu15Zn10
10*10*4
900
15
450
8
3
20
1.336
1814.9
0.97



Example 12
Pr30Gd5Dy40Cu15Zn10
10*10*4
900
15
450
8
3
20
1.275
1751.2
0.97



Comparative
Pr10Gd5Dy70Cu5Ga10
10*10*3
910
10
450
8
5
10
1.320
2133.3
0.96
0.485%


Example 4














Example 13
Pr10Gd5Dy70Cu5Ga10
10*10*3
910
10
450
8
5
10
1.295
2101.4
0.97
0.486%


Example 14
Pr10Gd5Dy70Cu5Ga10
10*10*3
910
10
450
8
5
10
1.290
1990.0
0.97



Example 15
Pr10Gd5Dy70Cu5Ga10
10*10*3
910
10
450
8
5
10
1.284
1870.6
0.97



Example 16
Pr10Gd5Dy70Cu5Ga10
10*10*3
910
10
450
8
5
10
1.226
1791.0
0.97



Comparative
Pr40Ho5Dy40Cu5Ga5Ti5
10*10*3
910
10
520
4
5
15
1.350
2149.2
0.97
0.495%


Example 5














Example 17
Pr40Ho5Dy40Cu5Ga5Ti5
10*10*3
910
10
520
4
5
15
1.325
2109.4
0.97
0.496%


Example 18
Pr40Ho5Dy40Cu5Ga5Ti5
10*10*3
910
10
520
4
5
15
1.320
1998.0
0.97



Example 19
Pr40Ho5Dy40Cu5Ga5Ti5
10*10*3
910
10
520
4
5
15
1.316
1830.8
0.97



Example 20
Pr40Ho5Dy40Cu5Ga5Ti5
10*10*3
910
10
520
4
5
15
1.260
1751.2
0.97



Comparative
Pr45Ho5Dy45Cu5Al3Sn2
10*10*3
910
10
480
3
1
20
1.360
2045.7
0.96
0.505%


Example 6














Example 21
Pr45Ho5Dy45Cu5Al3Sn2
10*10*3
910
10
480
3
1
20
1.330
2005.9
0.97
0.509%


Example 22
Pr45Ho5Dy45Cu5Al3Sn2
10*10*3
910
10
480
3
1
20
1.325
1870.6
0.97



Example 23
Pr45Ho5Dy45Cu5Al3Sn2
10*10*3
910
10
480
3
1
20
1.320
1711.4
0.97



Example 24
Pr45Ho5Dy45Cu5Al3Sn2
10*10*3
910
10
480
3
1
20
1.260
1655.7
0.97



Comparative
Pr35Gd10Dy45Cu5Mg5
10*10*4
930
6
600
5
1
5
1.415
1862.6
0.97
0.560%


Example 7














Example 25
Pr35Gd10Dy45Cu5Mg5
10*10*4
930
6
600
5
1
5
1.390
1838.8
0.97
0.565%


Example 26
Pr35Gd10Dy45Cu5Mg5
10*10*4
930
6
600
5
1
5
1.365
1751.2
0.97



Example 27
Pr35Gd10Dy45Cu5Mg5
10*10*4
930
6
600
5
1
5
1.358
1711.4
0.97



Example 28
Pr35Gd10Dy45Cu5Mg5
10*10*4
930
6
600
5
1
5
1.332
1631.8
0.97









Based on the above data, it is assumed that the CeCu, CeAl, and CeGa powders are added to the grain boundary of the NdFeB alloy flakes and the melting point of the grain boundary is thereby lowered. The obtained modified grain boundary channels of sintered NdFeB permanent magnets are useful for the diffusion process to be followed, especially when the diffusion source is a heavy rare earth alloy. The coercivity of the obtained NdFeB magnets increases significantly to ΔHcj>636.8kA/m after diffusion, and the coercivity of Examples 1-28 is significantly better compared to Comparative Examples 1-7.


Specifically, the various examples and the comparative examples are analyzed as follows:


Examples 1, 2, 3, 4 and Comparative Example 1 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 1, 2, 3, 4 and Comparative Example 1 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.022, 0.021, 0.023, 0.02, 0.023T of Br, and increased by 924.2, 891.5, 899.5, 891.5 and 812.7kA/m of ΔHcj. It can be seen that the magnets including Ce show a significant increase of ΔHcj. The difference of Hcj between Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 is only 23.88kA/m. It can further be seen that Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 1 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.520% and the βHcj of Example 1 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.521%. In summary, the low-cost Ce-containing magnets of the present examples show useful magnetic characteristics.


Examples 5, 6, 7, 8 and the Comparative Example 2 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Example 5, 6, 7, 8 and Comparative Example 2 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.025, 0.026, 0.025, 0.023, 0.027T of Br, increased by 915.4, 883.6, 923.4, 899.5 and 804.8kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference in Hcj of Example 5 and Comparative Example 2 are only 39.8kA/m. It can be shown that Example 5 and Comparative Example 2 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 2 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.490% and the βHcj of Example 5 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.495%.


Examples 9, 10, 11, 12 and the Comparative Example 3 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 9, 10, 11, 12 and Comparative Example 3 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.025, 0.024, 0.024, 0.027, 0.026 T of Br, increased by 887.5, 899.5, 923.4, 899.5 and 784 kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference Hcj of Example 9 and Comparative Example 3 is only 39.8 kA/m. It can be shown that Example 9 and Comparative Example 3 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 3 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.495% and the βHcj of Example 9 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.497%.


Examples 13, 14, 15, 16 and the Comparative Example 4 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 13, 14, 15, 16 and Comparative Example 4 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.025, 0.027, 0.026, 0.024, 0.025 T of Br, increased by 732.3, 748.2, 756.2, 716.4 and 628.8 kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference Hcj of Example 13 and Comparative Example 4 are only 31.8 kA/m. The βHcj of Comparative Example 4 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.485% and the βHcj of example 13 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.486%.


Examples 17, 18, 19, 20 and the Comparative Example 5 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 17, 18, 19, 20 and Comparative Example 5 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.025, 0.025, 0.027, 0.025, 0.027 T of Br, increased by 859.7, 851.7, 835.8, 796 and 754.6 kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference Hcj of Example 17 and Comparative Example 5 is only 38.8 kA/m. It can be shown that Example 17 and Comparative Example 5 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 5 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.495% and the βHcj of example 13 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.496%.


Examples 21, 22, 23, 24 and the Comparative Example 6 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 21, 22, 23, 24 and Comparative Example 6 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.02, 0.023, 0.023, 0.02, 0.02 T of Br, increased by 796, 772, 756.2, 740.3 and 698 kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference Hcj of Example 21 and Comparative Example 6 is only 38.8 kA/m. It can be shown that Example 21 and Comparative Example 6 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 6 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.505% and the Hcj of example 21 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.509%.


Examples 25, 26, 27, 28 and the Comparative Example 7 have the same size and NdFeB magnet composition except for the Ce content, the same diffusion temperature and aging temperature and other conditions. The performance of Examples 26, 27, 28, 29 and Comparative Example 7 by the diffusion process decreased by 0.022, 0.021, 0.02, 0.022, 0.021 T of Br, increased by 761.8, 780, 728.3, 8.87 and 706 kA/m of ΔHcj. The difference Hcj of Example 25 and Comparative Example 7 are only 23.88 kA/m. It can be shown that Example 25 and Comparative Example 7 have basically the same temperature coefficient of the coercivity. That is to say, the βHcj of Comparative Example 7 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.560% and the βHcj of example 25 at temperature of 150° C. is −0.565%.


It has been found that the ΔHcj of Ce-containing magnets after the diffusion process is obviously greater than the ΔHcj of conventional magnets. Ce-containing magnets which are diffused with a heavy rare earth alloy diffusion source are cheaper than the conventional magnets being diffuse by the same heavy rare earth alloy diffusion source. The Ce-containing magnets have obvious cost advantages.

Claims
  • 1. A method of preparing a high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium comprising the following steps: (S1) providing alloy flakes composed of RxT(1-x-y-z)ByMz whereinR is at least one of Nd, Pr, Ho, and Gd;T is at least one of Fe and Co; andM is at least one of Mg, Ti, Zr, Nb, and Mo; andx, y, and z are 28.0wt %≤x≤33.0wt %, 0.8wt %≤y≤1.2wt %, and 0wt %≤z≤3.0wt %;(S2) mixing the alloy flakes, a low melting point powder, and a lubricant, then subjecting the mixture to a hydrogen embrittlement process followed in this order by pulverizing the process product to an alloy powder by jet milling, magnetic field orientation molding of the alloy powder to obtain a blank, sintering and aging treatment the blank, and cutting the obtained sintered NdFeB magnet into the desired shape, wherein the low melting point powder is at least one of CeαAl100-α with 90≤α≤99, CeβCu1-β with 80≤β≤99 and CeγGa1-βwith 80≤γ≤99 and wherein a content of the Ce in the mixture is in the range of 1 to 10 wt % based on a total weight of the alloy flakes and the low melting point powder;(S3) coating a film composed of a diffusion source of formula R1xR2yHzM1-x-y-z on the sintered NdFeB magnet, whereinR1 is at least one element of Nd and Pr;R2 is at least one element of Ho and Gd;H is at least one element of Tb and Dy;M is at least two elements of Al, Cu, Ga, Ti, Co, Mg, Zn, and Sn; andx, y, and z are 5.0wt % <x<50.0wt %, 0wt % <y≤15.0wt %, and 30.0wt % ≤z≤90.0wt %; and(S4) performing a diffusion heat treatment so as to diffuse the diffusion source into the sintered NdFeB magnet, followed by aging the sintered NdFeB magnet to obtain the low-cost rare earth magnet.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the hydrogen embrittlement process in step S2 comprises a hydrogen absorption step and a dehydrogenation step, the hydrogen absorption step is performed at a temperature in the range of 100 to 300° C. and the dehydrogenation step is performed at a temperature in the range of 400 to 600° C.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein during the hydrogen absorption step, the content of hydrogen content is less than 1000 ppm, and the content of oxygen is less than 500 ppm.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S2, an average particle size D50 of the low melting point powders is 200 nm-4 μm and an average particle size D50 of the NdFeB powder after jet milling is 3-5 μm, each measured by laser diffraction.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S2, a sintering temperature of NdFeB magnets is 980-1060° C. and a sintering time is 6-15 h.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aging includes a primary aging step at 850° C. for 3 h and a secondary aging step at 450-660° C. for 3 h.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein in step S4, a diffusion temperature is 850-930° C. for a diffusion time of 6-30 h and an aging temperature is 420-680° C. for an aging time of 3-10 h.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein in step S4, a heating rate to the aging temperature is 1-5° C./min and a cooling rate is 5-20° C./min.
  • 9. A high-coercivity sintered NdFeB magnet including cerium obtained by the preparation method of claim 1.
  • 10. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step S2, an average particle size D50 of the low melting point powders is 200 nm-4 μm and an average particle size D50 of the NdFeB powder after jet milling is 3-5 μm, each measured by laser diffraction.
  • 11. The method according to claim 3, wherein in step S2, an average particle size D50 of the low melting point powders is 200 nm-4 μm and an average particle size D50 of the NdFeB powder after jet milling is 3-5 μm, each measured by laser diffraction.
  • 12. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step S2, a sintering temperature of NdFeB magnets is 980-1060° C. and a sintering time is 6-15 h.
  • 13. The method according to claim 3, wherein in step S2, a sintering temperature of NdFeB magnets is 980-1060° C. and a sintering time is 6-15 h.
  • 14. The method according to claim 4, wherein in step S2, a sintering temperature of NdFeB magnets is 980-1060° C. and a sintering time is 6-15 h.
  • 15. The method according to claim 2, wherein the aging includes a primary aging step at 850° C. for 3 h and a secondary aging step at 450-660° C. for 3 h.
  • 16. The method according to claim 3, wherein the aging includes a primary aging step at 850° C. for 3 h and a secondary aging step at 450-660° C. for 3 h.
  • 17. The method according to claim 4, wherein the aging includes a primary aging step at 850° C. for 3 h and a secondary aging step at 450-660° C. for 3 h.
  • 18. The method according to claim 2, wherein in step S4, a diffusion temperature is 850-930° C. for a diffusion time of 6-30 h and an aging temperature is 420-680° C. for an aging time of 3-10 h.
  • 19. The method according to claim 3, wherein in step S4, a diffusion temperature is 850-930° C. for a diffusion time of 6-30 h and an aging temperature is 420-680° C. for an aging time of 3-10 h.
  • 20. The method according to claim 4, wherein in step S4, a diffusion temperature is 850-930° C. for a diffusion time of 6-30 h and an aging temperature is 420-680° C. for an aging time of 3-10 h.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
202111121731.8 Sep 2021 CN national