The invention relates to a method for controlling a fuel cell system comprising one or more fuel cells. The invention also relates to a fuel cell system comprising one or more fuel cells and a cooling system with a cooling fluid for cooling the one or more fuel cells during use. The invention also relates to a control unit, a vehicle, a computer program and a computer readable medium.
The invention can be applied in heavy-duty vehicles, such as trucks, buses and construction equipment. Although the invention will be described with respect to a truck, the invention is not restricted to this particular vehicle, but may also be used in other vehicles such as passenger cars.
A fuel cell is an electrochemical cell which converts chemical energy into electricity. The fuel cell converts the chemical energy of a fuel, typically hydrogen, and an oxidizing agent, typically oxygen, into electricity. Typically, a plurality of fuel cells is arranged in a fuel cell system for generating power.
Accordingly, a fuel cell system can be used as an alternative or as a complement to electric batteries. In recent years fuel cell systems have been considered for powering electric vehicles, such as pure electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles.
When a fuel cell system operates at low current densities, the polarisation cell voltage of the fuel cells increases, which in turn has a negative impact on the durability of the fuel cells. To save the fuel cells from degradation, an operational maximum polarisation cell voltage is set, meaning in practice that the lowest operational power of the fuel cells is limited.
However, in certain applications, such as for some driving scenarios when the fuel cell system is used to power a vehicle, it is desired to use the fuel cell system at an operation power being lower than this limit.
One present solution to this problem is to shut down the fuel cell system, and to instead utilise other power sources such as batteries to provide the requested low power. Another present solution is to allow the fuel cell to continue operating at a higher power than the requested low power, but to utilise the non-required excess power to charge the batteries of the vehicle. However, this solution requires that the batteries are available to store the excess energy.
Therefore, there is a strive to develop alternative and/or improved fuel cell related technology which takes at least some of the above concerns into account.
An object of the present invention is to provide a method for controlling a fuel cell system which provides an alternative and/or an improvement in relation to known methods of controlling fuel cell systems. In addition, an object of the invention is to provide a method for controlling a fuel cell system which enables operation at a relatively low operational power of the fuel cell. Yet further objects of the invention are to provide a control unit for controlling cooling of a fuel cell system, a fuel cell system, a vehicle, and a computer program and/or computer readable medium.
According to a first aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a method according to claim 1.
Thus, a method for controlling a fuel cell system is provided, the fuel cell system comprising one or more fuel cells and a cooling system. The method comprises:
The fuel cell system may typically be configured to be operated below a predetermined polarisation cell voltage limit. The cooling system may be controllable to a coolant temperature setpoint, wherein, for each coolant temperature setpoint, the predetermined polarisation cell voltage limit corresponds to a lower power limit of the fuel cell system.
By the provision of a method as disclosed herein, an improved method is achieved in which the lower power limit may be reduced while maintaining a predetermined maximum polarisation cell voltage limit. The method is based on a realization that, by cooling the fuel cell(s) to a reduced temperature as compared to a nominal coolant temperature obtained if no additional cooling is performed, the lower power limit may be reduced as compared to a first lower power limit obtained if no additional cooling is performed, while remaining below the predetermined maximum polarisation cell voltage limit. Thus, relatively low power operation of the fuel cell(s) may be obtained without increase of the maximum polarisation cell voltage and hence without risking increased degradation of the fuel cell(s).
The step of determining the at least one future time interval during which the coolant temperature is to be adjusted to a predeterminable reduced coolant temperature may be carried out in response to detecting that the predicted future power request fulfils the predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition. Since the method as disclosed herein predicts the future power request and uses this predicted power request for controlling the coolant temperature, a proactive control of the fuel cell temperature and thereby the lower power limit is achieved. Thus, in contrast to a reactive control strategy by which there is a risk that that the cooling system may be operated using short cycles which for instance may result in fluctuations, oscillations or other undesired transient behaviours, the method according to the first aspect of the present invention implies that the fuel cell system may be operated in a more stable manner.
The future power request is herein to be understood as a sequence of instantaneous power requests at given time instants over the future prediction horizon. The prediction horizon may preferably be defined in terms of time, but it is also possible to define it in terms of distance when the fuel cell system is provided in a vehicle travelling along a travelling route. In that case, the future time interval(s) and the instant time interval(s) may be defined in terms of points or intervals along an expected travelling route. The prediction of the future power request is typically performed continually, so that, e.g., the average predicted power request is a moving average value updated at each prediction instant.
By also using the average predicted power request for determining when and for how long to reduce the coolant temperature setpoint, the fuel cell system may be operated with a reduced risk for rapid changes in the control of the cooling system, such as rapid switching between different coolant temperature setpoints, as compared to a control based on an instantaneous power request.
Optionally, an average predicted power request over the future prediction horizon must be higher than a predefined minimum allowable power limit of the fuel cell system for the coolant temperature reduction condition to be considered fulfilled. Thus, the coolant temperature reduction condition is herein only considered fulfilled if on one hand the predicted power request is lower than the predetermined first lower power limit at one or more instant time intervals during the future prediction horizon, and on the other hand the average predicted power request is higher than the predefined minimum allowable power limit.
Optionally, the reduced coolant temperature is lower than a nominal coolant temperature but higher than or equal to a minimum coolant temperature associated with a predefined minimum allowable power limit of the fuel cell system.
The minimum coolant temperature associated with the minimum allowable power limit is to be understood as the lowest possible coolant temperature of the cooling system. The minimum coolant temperature may correspond to a predetermined fixed temperature setpoint, or to a setpoint determined in dependence on, e.g., ambient conditions, such as ambient conditions relating to temperature, humidity, etc.
Optionally, the first lower power limit is associated with a nominal coolant temperature, i.e., a temperature obtained if no additional cooling is performed. In other words, the first lower power limit is the lower power limit of the fuel cell system associated with the nominal coolant temperature setpoint of the cooling system.
Optionally, the at least one future time interval is determined to include at least the one or more instant time intervals. Thus, the coolant temperature is in this case controlled to the reduced coolant temperature at least during the one or more instant time intervals. This enables a reduced output power from the fuel cell system at least during the one or more instant time intervals when the predicted power request is lower than the first lower power limit.
Optionally, when the coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled, and when the predicted power request is higher than or equal to a predetermined second lower power limit over the entire prediction horizon, an aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval is set to a first duration coinciding with an aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals. The second lower power limit is lower than the first lower power limit. Thus, when the at least one future time interval is determined to include at least the one or more instant time intervals, the coolant temperature is only reduced during the one or more instant time intervals when the predicted power request is lower than the first lower power limit.
Optionally, when the coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled, and when the predicted power request is lower than a predetermined second lower power limit during at least one sub-interval of said one or more instant time intervals, an aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval is set to a second duration exceeding an aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals. The second lower power limit is lower than the first lower power limit. The second duration may, e.g., exceed the aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals at least by a fixed amount. The at least one future time interval herein preferably includes the at least the one or more instant time intervals. If several instant time intervals are identified, a single future time interval spanning over all those instant time intervals may be determined, or two or more future time intervals may be determined, each including at least one of the instant time intervals. Preferably, when the predicted power request is lower than the second lower power limit during a sub-interval of one instant time interval, the future time interval is set so that it includes that instant time interval, and also has a duration exceeding that instant time interval.
Optionally, the second duration is determined in dependence on a relation between an average predicted power request over the future prediction horizon and at least the first lower power limit, optionally also the second power limit. For example, when the average predicted power request is higher than the first lower power limit, the second duration may be set to a shorter value than when the average predicted power request is lower than the first lower power limit.
Optionally, when the average predicted power request over the future prediction horizon is higher than or equal to the first lower power limit, the second duration is set to less than 80% of the future prediction horizon, preferably less than 70%, more preferably less than 60% of the prediction horizon. In such cases, it may be sufficient to reduce the coolant temperature setpoint for a duration significantly shorter than a duration of the prediction horizon in order to comply with the power request as predicted over the prediction horizon.
Optionally, the second lower power limit is associated with the reduced coolant temperature. In other words, the second lower power limit is the lower power limit of the fuel cell system associated with the reduced coolant temperature setpoint of the cooling system.
Optionally, when the coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled, and when the average predicted power request over the future prediction horizon is lower than the first lower power limit but higher than or equal to the second lower power limit, the at least one future time interval is set to include at least 90%, preferably 100%, of the future prediction horizon. The inventors have found that it may, when the average power request falls within the defined limits, be beneficial to reduce the coolant temperature setpoint for a relatively long time period, such as over the entire prediction horizon, in order to achieve a stable control of the cooling system and avoid fast switching between coolant temperature setpoints. The relatively long time with a reduced coolant temperature allows the fuel cell system to deliver power at a lower power level than would otherwise be possible.
Optionally, the method comprises:
When the average predicted power request is below the minimum allowable power limit, it may not be possible to operate the fuel cell system. As such, shutting down the fuel cell system may be an appropriate measure to take.
Optionally, in response to detecting that the predicted power request is higher than or equal to the determined first lower power limit over the entire future prediction horizon, the method comprises controlling the coolant temperature to a nominal coolant temperature. In this case, it will not be necessary to reduce the coolant temperature, and normal operation of the fuel cell using the nominal coolant temperature setpoint is appropriate.
Optionally, the fuel cell system is adapted to deliver power contributing to the propulsion of a vehicle, and predicting the future power request comprises:
One or more of the above vehicle related pieces of information may result in that the future power request is predicted in an appropriate manner.
Optionally, the fuel cell system further comprises a battery to which the one of more fuel cells are electrically connected, and predicting the future power request comprises:
The battery information may for instance provide information indicative of whether or not it is possible to operate the fuel cell system to charge the battery. The actual operation of the fuel cell system during the prediction horizon may be dependent on whether or not the battery can be charged. As such, information as regards the battery may be used in order to adequately predict the average predicted power request.
Optionally, the future prediction horizon is a time period of at least 10 seconds, preferably at least 100 seconds, more preferred at least 300 seconds. Optionally, the future prediction horizon may be a time period of 1000 seconds or more.
According to a second aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a control unit according to claim 16.
Thus, a control unit for controlling cooling of a fuel cell system comprising one or more fuel cells and a cooling system for cooling the one or more fuel cells during use is provided. The control unit is adapted to:
The control unit may be configured to perform the method according to any one of the embodiments of the first aspect of the invention. The control unit may be an electronic control unit. Th control unit may, e.g., be configured to control the coolant temperature by controlling a coolant temperature setpoint.
Advantages and effects of the second aspect of the invention are largely analogous to the advantages and effects of the fist aspect of the invention.
According to a third aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a fuel cell system according to claim 17.
Thus, a fuel cell system comprising one or more fuel cells and a cooling system for cooling the one or more fuel cells during use is provided. The fuel cell system further comprises a control unit according to any one of the embodiments of the second aspect of the invention.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a vehicle according to claim 18.
Thus, a vehicle comprising the fuel cell system according to any one of the embodiments of the third aspect of the invention and/or being in communication with a control unit according to any one of the embodiments of the second aspect of the invention is provided.
Advantages and effects of the fourth aspect are largely analogous to the advantages and effects of the first, second and third aspects of the invention. Furthermore, all embodiments of the fourth aspect of the invention are combinable with all embodiments of the first, second and third aspects of the invention, and vice versa.
According to a fifth aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a computer program according to claim 19.
Thus, a computer program comprising program code means for performing the method of any one of the embodiments of the first aspect of the invention when the program is run on a computer, such as, e.g., a control unit of a vehicle or a fuel cell system, such as the control unit according to any one of the embodiments of the second aspect of the invention, is provided.
According to a sixth aspect of the invention, at least one of the objects is achieved by a computer readable medium according to claim 20.
Thus, a computer readable medium carrying a computer program comprising program code means for performing the method of any one of the embodiments of the first aspect of the invention when the program product is run on a computer, such as, e.g., a control unit of a vehicle or a fuel cell system, such as the control unit of any one of the embodiments of the second aspect of the invention, is provided.
Further advantages and advantageous features of the invention are disclosed in the following description and in the dependent claims.
With reference to the appended drawings, below follows a more detailed description of embodiments of the invention cited as examples.
In the drawings:
With reference to the appended drawings, below follows a more detailed description of embodiments of the invention cited as examples.
The vehicle 100 comprises a fuel cell system 1 according to an example embodiment of the invention. The fuel cell system 1 is here used for powering one or more electric motors (not shown) which are used for creating a propulsion force to the vehicle 100. The fuel cell system 1 may additionally or alternatively be used for powering other electric power consumers of the vehicle, such as an electric motor for a refrigerator system, an electric motor for an air conditioning system or any other electric power consuming function of the vehicle 100.
The vehicle 100 further comprises a control unit 30 according to an example embodiment of the invention. The control unit 30 is thus used for controlling the fuel cell system 1. Even though an on-board control unit 30 is shown, it shall be understood that the control unit 30 could also be a remote control unit 30, i.e. an off-board control unit, or a combination of an on-board and off-board control unit. The control unit 30 may be configured to control the fuel cell system 1 by issuing control signals and by receiving status information relating to the fuel cell system 1.
The control unit 30 is an electronic control unit and may comprise processing circuitry which is adapted to run a computer program as disclosed herein. The control unit 30 may comprise hardware and/or software for performing the method according to the invention. In an embodiment the control unit 30 may be denoted a computer. The control unit 30 may be constituted by one or more separate sub-control units. In addition, the control unit 30 may communicate by use of wired and/or wireless communication means.
The fuel cell system 1 comprises one or more fuel cells 10, typically several fuel cells. The fuel cells 10 may also be denoted as a fuel cell stack, wherein the fuel cell stack may comprise several hundreds of fuel cells. Further, the fuel cell system 1 will be arranged to provide the fuel cell 10 with necessary supply of hydrogen and air. Further the fuel cell system 1 comprises a cooling system 20. As illustrated in
As shown, the cooling system 20 as exemplified in
Optionally, and as shown in
The fuel cell system 1 may further comprise a battery (not shown) to which the one of more fuel cells 10 are electrically connected. The fuel cell system 1 may be adapted to charge the battery at least during a charging condition of the power assembly.
Further, in addition or alternative to what is mentioned in the above, the fuel cell system 1 may comprise various components such as compressors, sensors, pumps, valves and electrical components.
It is desirable to operate the fuel cell system 1 below a predetermined polarisation cell voltage limit in order to reduce fuel cell degradation. The polarisation cell voltage may be described as a temperature dependent function of the fuel cell system power. Thus, for each coolant temperature setpoint, the predetermined maximum polarisation cell voltage limit corresponds to a lower power limit of the fuel cell system 1. For a given coolant temperature setpoint, the polarisation cell voltage is generally highest as a lower limit fuel cell system power is provided by the fuel cell(s). The polarisation cell voltage decreases with increasing fuel cell system power. The polarisation cell voltage as a function of the fuel cell system power may vary between different fuel cells and may for example be obtained by empirical tests. To spare the fuel cell(s) 10 from degradation, it is desired to operate the fuel cell(s) 10 below the predetermined polarisation cell voltage limit.
Reference is also made to
In a first step S1 of the method illustrated in
When the fuel cell system 1 is provided in a vehicle, such as the vehicle 100 in
When the fuel cell system 1 comprises a battery to which the one of more fuel cells 10 are electrically connected, the step S1 of predicting the future power request P(t) may further comprise receiving battery information indicative of at least one of a current state-of-charge and an energy capacity of the battery during the future prediction horizon Δt, and using the received battery information for predicting the future power request P(t) during the future prediction horizon Δt.
In a second step S2, it is detected that a predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled. The coolant temperature reduction condition may be considered fulfilled when on one hand the predicted power request P(t) is lower than a first lower power limit Pmin1, associated with a nominal coolant temperature, at one or more instant time intervals dt, dt1, dt2 during the prediction horizon Δt, and when on the other hand an average predicted power request Pavg over the prediction horizon Δt is higher than a minimum allowable power limit Pmin0 of the fuel cell system 1. The first lower power limit Pmin1 is shown as a dashed line in
A third step S3 is carried out in response to the predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition being fulfilled. In this step S3, at least one future time interval δt within the prediction horizon Δt, during which future time interval δt the coolant temperature is to be adjusted to a predeterminable reduced coolant temperature, is determined. The reduced coolant temperature may be lower than the nominal coolant temperature but higher than or equal to a minimum coolant temperature associated with the minimum allowable power limit Pmin0 of the fuel cell system 1.
A fourth step S4 of controlling the coolant temperature to the reduced coolant temperature is carried out during the determined at least one future time interval δt. In other words, the reduced coolant temperature is used as a target value, or temperature setpoint, for the coolant temperature control.
When it is detected in step S2 that the coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled, and when the predicted power request P(t) is higher than or equal to a second lower power limit Pmin2 associated with the reduced coolant temperature over the entire prediction horizon Δt, an aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval δt may be set to a first duration coinciding with an aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals dt. This situation is illustrated in
If instead the average predicted power request Pavg over the prediction horizon Δt is lower than the first lower power limit Pmin1, but higher than or equal to the second lower power limit Pmin2, the future time interval δt may be set to include at least 90%, preferably 100%, of the prediction horizon Δt. This is illustrated in
The method then proceeds to the step S2 of detecting that the predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition is fulfilled. When it is determined that the predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition as described above is fulfilled, the method proceeds to step S3 of determining the least one future time interval δt. This step may in turn comprise several sub-steps.
First, it may in step S31 be checked if the predicted power request P(t) is higher than or equal to the second lower power limit Pmin2 over the entire prediction horizon Δt. If the answer is YES, the method proceeds to step S32 of setting the aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval δt to coincide with the aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals dt. The method then proceeds to step S4 of controlling the coolant temperature to the reduced coolant temperature during the determined future time interval δt.
If the answer in step S31 is NO, i.e., the predicted power request P(t) is lower than the second lower power limit Pmin2 at least at some point during the prediction horizon Δt, the method proceeds to step S33.
In step S33, it is checked if the average power request Pavg is higher than or equal to the first lower power limit Pmin1. If the answer is YES, the method proceeds to step S34 of setting the aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval δt to a second duration as required, exceeding the aggregated duration of the one or more instant time intervals dt, but being significantly smaller than the prediction horizon Δt. The method then proceeds to step S4 of controlling the coolant temperature to the reduced coolant temperature during the determined future time interval δt.
If the answer in step S33 is NO, the method proceeds to step S35.
In step S35, it is checked if the average power request Pavg is higher than or equal to the second lower power limit Pmin2. If the answer is YES, the method proceeds to step S36 of setting the aggregated duration of the at least one future time interval δt to a second duration including at least 90%, preferably 100%, of the prediction horizon Δt. The method then proceeds to step S4 of controlling the coolant temperature to the reduced coolant temperature during the determined future time interval δt.
If the answer in step S35 is NO, i.e., the average power request Pavg is lower than the second lower power limit Pmin2, the method may repeat step S36 for a third lower power limit, lower than the second lower power limit Pmin2 but higher than the minimum allowable power limit Pmin0. If the average power request Pavg is ultimately found to be lower than the minimum allowable power limit Pmin0, the method proceeds to a step S22 of shutting down the fuel cell system 1 at least during the prediction horizon Δt.
When it is in step S2 determined that the predetermined coolant temperature reduction condition is not fulfilled, the method may proceed to a step S20 of determining a reason for this. If the reason is that the predicted power request P(t) is consistently higher than the first lower power limit Pmin1 over the prediction horizon Δt, the method proceeds to step S21 of controlling the coolant temperature to the nominal coolant temperature. This corresponds to normal operation of the fuel cell system 1. If the reason is instead that the average power request Pavg over the prediction horizon Δt is lower than the predefined minimum allowable power limit Pmin0, the method proceeds to the step S22 of shutting down the fuel cell system 1 at least during the prediction horizon Δt.
Further advantages and advantageous features of the invention are disclosed in the following description and in the dependent claims. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above and illustrated in the drawings; rather, the skilled person will recognize that many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2021/085850 | 12/15/2021 | WO |