A Profile of Spatial Abilities in People with Down Syndrome and Their Correlations with Everyday Behavior

Information

  • Research Project
  • 9933539
  • ApplicationId
    9933539
  • Core Project Number
    SC2HD103587
  • Full Project Number
    1SC2HD103587-01
  • Serial Number
    103587
  • FOA Number
    PAR-16-438
  • Sub Project Id
  • Project Start Date
    5/1/2020 - 4 years ago
  • Project End Date
    4/30/2023 - a year ago
  • Program Officer Name
    BARDHAN, SUJATA
  • Budget Start Date
    5/1/2020 - 4 years ago
  • Budget End Date
    4/30/2021 - 3 years ago
  • Fiscal Year
    2020
  • Support Year
    01
  • Suffix
  • Award Notice Date
    4/24/2020 - 4 years ago

A Profile of Spatial Abilities in People with Down Syndrome and Their Correlations with Everyday Behavior

Project Summary Down Syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability (ID) in the United States. For a long time, researchers have considered spatial abilities as an area of strength in people with DS. As a core intelligence, spatial abilities are used in a wide variety of daily activities and serve as a foundation for other complex cognitive processes. Studying spatial abilities in people with DS has widespread implications, ranging from promoting their daily living skills, expanding their job opportunities, to providing key outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Despite the importance of the topic, our recent review suggests that it is too premature to conclude that spatial abilities, in general, are an area of strength for people with DS based on extant research. More specifically, previous research was seldom motivated by behavioral theories of spatial abilities, has yielded inconsistent results due to methodological variations, and has not assessed several key spatial abilities in people with DS. The current study proposes to systematically and comprehensively evaluate spatial abilities and behaviors in people with DS. Our rationale is that a systematic investigation of spatial abilities should be guided by a theoretical framework for categorizing spatial abilities and implemented through rigorous methodologies. Further, a complete spatial profile of people with DS requires both fundamental and applied approaches to research. We propose two specific aims: 1). To systematically evaluate the spatial abilities of individuals with DS relative to mental ability (MA)- matched typically developing (TD) children and MA- and chronological age (CA)- matched individuals with ID (not DS). 2). To determine the competencies in everyday spatial behaviors for people with DS and their relations with spatial abilities. To achieve these aims, 30 people with DS aged 16-25 years, 30 MA-matched TD children, and 30 MA- and CA-matched people with ID will participate in a series of spatial tasks representing four distinct spatial categories (i.e., intrinsic-static; intrinsic- dynamic; extrinsic-static; extrinsic-dynamic) based on a spatial theoretical framework. Their parents/caregivers will complete ratings of everyday spatial behaviors and daily living skills. Preliminary data support that people with DS may show more severe weaknesses in some, but not other, spatial areas and that there is an urgent need for research of spatial abilities voiced by the parents of children with DS. For the first time, this study will establish a comprehensive cognitive/behavioral profile of spatial abilities, thereby identifying the strengths and weaknesses within the spatial domain for individuals with DS. This study will also be the first to provide an ecological profile of spatial behaviors for individuals with DS. Practically, by identifying spatial weaknesses the proposed study will pave ways for clinical trials designed for improving the performance of persons with DS in spatial abilities and spatially oriented activities that are critical to everyday functioning and job prospects. Theoretically, the proposed study will help to identify the mechanisms of typical and atypical spatial development, and the roles of brain and neurological differences underlying DS.

IC Name
EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
  • Activity
    SC2
  • Administering IC
    HD
  • Application Type
    1
  • Direct Cost Amount
    100000
  • Indirect Cost Amount
    45000
  • Total Cost
    145000
  • Sub Project Total Cost
  • ARRA Funded
    False
  • CFDA Code
    865
  • Ed Inst. Type
    SCHOOLS OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
  • Funding ICs
    NIGMS:145000\
  • Funding Mechanism
    OTHER RESEARCH-RELATED
  • Study Section
    ZGM1
  • Study Section Name
    Special Emphasis Panel
  • Organization Name
    MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY
  • Organization Department
    PSYCHOLOGY
  • Organization DUNS
    053506184
  • Organization City
    MONTCLAIR
  • Organization State
    NJ
  • Organization Country
    UNITED STATES
  • Organization Zip Code
    070431624
  • Organization District
    UNITED STATES