The invention relates to a radiation detector and to a method of manufacturing the radiation detector and a method of detecting incident radiation. The invention further relates to a flat panel radiation detector which includes said radiation detector and to a radiological instrument which includes any of said radiation detector or flat panel radiation detector.
Radiation detectors are devices capable of detecting incident radiation. In medicine, radiation detectors for X-ray images have large applications for diagnosis of a patient's condition. The radiation detectors for X-ray images are typically integrated in radiological instruments that utilize computer-processed X-ray images to produce images of specific areas of a patient's body. These images may be planar images, panoramic images or so-called tomographic images. Planar images are typically obtained by flat panel radiation detectors. Panoramic images may be obtained by a sequence of planar images taken one after another. Tomographic images may instead be obtained by a three-dimensional reconstruction of the specific areas of the patient's body. The radiological instruments may be intra-oral radiologic dental imagers, dental imagers, computed tomography scanners (CT-scanner), computed axial tomography scanners (CAT-scanners), mobile C-arm, etc. The radiation detectors for X-ray images usually consist of a radiation converter element (e.g. a scintillator) that absorbs and converts the incident radiation (i.e. X-rays) into converted radiation with longer wavelength (e.g. photons). The converted radiation with longer wavelength reaches a photo sensitive element, e.g. a CMOS photosensor, a CCD image sensor, etc. The photo sensitive element may be coupled to an electronic system that generates electrical signals corresponding to a radiation pattern of the incident radiation absorbed by the radiation converter element. Data embodied in such electrical signals may be shown in a visual display or sent to a computer for further analysis of the radiation pattern.
The converted radiation is isotropically generated in the radiation converter element. As a consequence the converted radiation originated at one originating area of the radiation converter element in response to the incident radiation may be transmitted through the radiation converter element to an area of the photosensor far away from the originating area of the radiation converter element. This results in an undesired effect which is sometimes called in the art crosstalk or optical light spreading and may result in blurred X-ray images or X-ray images with less spatial resolution. Several solutions exist to prevent or limit crosstalk in radiation detectors. For example U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 discloses a radiation detector for X-ray images that consists of a plurality of scintillator elements, a plurality of corresponding photosensitive elements underneath the scintillator elements and an intermediate layer in between. The scintillator elements are separated by each other by absorber plates to prevent direct lateral optical crosstalk of light quanta generated in the scintillator elements. The intermediate layer is constructed such to attenuate the light quanta generated in an originating scintillator element and travelling through multiple reflections in the intermediate layer from a photosensitive element corresponding to the originating scintillator element to neighbouring photosensitive elements.
US2012/0256095 discloses a radiation detector which consists of a sensor panel, a scintillator and two reflector layers placed on an opposite side of the sensor panel. The scintillator converts the incident radiation penetrating through the sensor panel to light and the light is detected by a photosensor in the sensor panel. The two reflector layers are constructed to specularly reflect light with a wavelength range lower than a desired wavelength threshold and to retro-reflect light with a wavelength range larger than the desired wavelength threshold. The desired wavelength threshold corresponds to an upper wavelength range of the spectral emission curve of the used scintillator. Since long-wavelength components of light generated in an originating area of the scintillator near the irradiated side tend to be transmitted through the scintillator with a small amount of refraction, the long-wavelength components of light may be typically transmitted at areas of the two reflector layers far away from the originating area of the scintillator near the irradiated side. The long-wavelength components of light are thus retro reflected by the reflector layers to bounce the long-wavelength components of the light back to the originating area of the scintillator. On the contrary, since short-wavelength components of the light generated in an area of the scintillator near the irradiated side tend to be more refrangible through the scintillator, the short-wavelength components of light may be typically transmitted through the scintillator at areas of the two reflector layers close to the corresponding originating area of the scintillator near the irradiated side. The short-wavelength components of light are thus specularly reflected by the two reflector layers to limit the lateral spreading of the short-wavelength components through the scintillator.
A problem with the solution disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 is that direct lateral optical crosstalk is reduced by the absorber plates between the scintillator elements, and the light quanta spreading through multiple reflections in the intermediate layer is reduced by a particular construction of the intermediate layer with substances which absorb electromagnetic radiations. Notably two distinct features are needed in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 to limit the crosstalk through the scintillator, the absorber plates and the particular construction of the intermediate layer. As a consequence cost and complexity involved to manufacture the radiation detector disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 may be increased.
A problem with the solution proposed in US2012/0256095 is that the converted light in the scintillator needs to travel to the two reflector layers and back to the sensor panel to be detected by the photosensor in the sensor panel. The converted light needs to travel two times the thickness of the scintillator before impinging on the photosensor in the sensor panel, thereby decreasing the overall conversion efficiency of the radiation detector. Another problem with the solution proposed in US2012/0256095 is that the lateral optical crosstalk caused by the short-wavelength components of the converted light may be only partially reduced by the two reflector layers. In fact since the short-wavelength components of the converted light are specularly reflected by the two reflected layers, there will always be a certain amount of lateral optical crosstalk caused by the short-wavelength components of the converted light.
One of the objects of the invention is to at least alleviate the problems of existing radiation detectors which are used to make radiographic images with reduced crosstalk. In particular one of the objects of the invention is to reduce the crosstalk generated within a radiation converter element of the radiation detector which converts incident radiations in the X-ray or gamma-ray range into converted radiation with higher wavelength than the X-ray or gamma-ray range. The converted radiation may be in an optical wavelength range. The crosstalk is caused by an isotropic scattering of the converted radiation which laterally spreads in the radiation converter element.
According to the invention this object is achieved by a radiation detector used to detect incident radiation at a first side of the radiation detector. The radiation detector includes a scintillator used to convert the incident radiation into converted radiation, a photosensor arranged at a second side of the radiation detector opposite to the first side receives the converted radiation from the scintillator, and an interference optical filter arranged between the scintillator and the photosensor. Areas of the scintillator on which the incident radiation impinges are intended to be imaged onto corresponding areas of the photosensor. The interference optical filter is constructed to attenuate a portion of the converted radiation resulting from the incident radiation which impinges on a particular one of the areas of the scintillator. The portion of the converted radiation attenuated by the interference optical filter is received through transmission through the interference optical filter by another one of the areas of the photosensor different from the one corresponding to the particular one of the areas of the scintillator.
By using the interference optical filter, the crosstalk in the radiation detector generated inside the scintillator by isotropic scattering of the converted radiation is reduced. The interference optical filter used in said radiation detector improves a so called detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of the radiation detector. The interference optical filter used in said radiation detector ensures that noise contribution caused by the laterally spread converted radiation which is received by an output area of the photosensor distant from an input originating area of the scintillator is at least attenuated. In this way blur and noise in radiographic images obtained by using the radiation detector according to the invention is reduced.
In an embodiment according to the invention, the interference optical filter may be constructed to transmit a portion of the converted radiation within a desired wavelength range to the photosensor and to reflect or absorb the converted radiation outside the desired wavelength range. The desired wavelength range may correspond to a combination of a specific emission wavelength band of the scintillator with which the converted radiation generated in the scintillator is emitted by the scintillator and a specific sensitivity wavelength band of the photosensor with which the photosensor may receive the converted radiation from the scintillator with the specific sensitivity. In this way a radiation detector with a reduced lateral optical crosstalk in the desired wavelength may be provided.
In another embodiment, the interference optical filter is constructed to increasingly attenuate a portion of the converted radiation in function of an increasing angle of incidence of the converted radiation with the interference optical filter. Since the converted radiation impinging on the interference optical filter with large angle of incidence causes a larger spread than the converted radiation impinging on the interference optical filter with small angle of incidence, attenuation by the interference optical filter of the portion of the converted radiation with larger angles of incidence with the interference filter improves further the lateral optical crosstalk and thus also the detective quantum efficiency.
In another embodiment according to the invention, the radiation detector further includes a reflector arranged at the first side of the radiation detector. The reflector is transparent to the incident radiation and may be constructed to reflect back to the scintillator a portion of the converted radiation directed towards the first side of the radiation detector. The reflector may be used to reflect back to the scintillator primary or secondary converted radiation. The primary converted radiation is a portion of the converted radiation which is generated in the scintillator and directly directed towards the first side of the radiation detector. The secondary converted radiation is a portion of the converted radiation which is generated in the scintillator directly directed towards the photosensor, reflected by the interference optical filter and impinging on the reflector. By using the reflector, a conversion efficiency of the radiation detector may be improved because the portion of the converted radiation which is directed towards the opposite side of the photosensor side may be recovered by one or multiple reflections in the reflector. The reflector may further ensure that any of the primary and/or secondary converted radiation may be reflected back to the area of the photosensor corresponding to the particular area of the scintillator wherein the converted radiation is generated. Alternatively the reflector may be constructed as the interference optical filter, i.e. to increasingly attenuate a portion of the primary or secondary converted radiation in function of an increasing angle of incidence of the portion of the primary or secondary converted radiation with the reflector. As a consequence the reflector may further improve the lateral optical crosstalk in the radiation detector.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a radiation detector which is used to detect incident radiation at a first side of the radiation detector, the method comprising the steps of:
constructing an interference optical filter,
coupling the interference optical filter to a photosensor at a second side of the radiation detector opposite to the first side, and
growing a scintillator layer being coupled to the interference optical filter, wherein the scintillator layer converts the incident radiation received at the first side into converted radiation, wherein the photosensor receives the converted radiation from the scintillator layer, wherein areas of the scintillator layer on which the incident radiation impinges are intended to be imaged onto corresponding areas of the photosensor and wherein the interference optical filter attenuates a portion of the converted radiation resulting from the incident radiation impinging on a particular one of the areas of the scintillator and received via direct transmission through the interference optical filter by another one of the areas of the photosensor different from the one corresponding to the particular one of the areas of the scintillator.
Such a method leads to a radiation detector which has the earlier mentioned advantages.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of detecting incident radiation received at a first side of a radiation detector, the method comprising:
converting the incident radiation into converted radiation with a scintillator,
receiving the converted radiation from the scintillator by a photosensor at a second side of the radiation detector opposite to the first side, wherein areas of the scintillator on which the incident radiation impinges are intended to be imaged onto corresponding areas of the photosensor, and
attenuating with an interference optical filter between the scintillator and the photosensor a portion of the converted radiation resulting from the incident radiation impinging on a particular one of the areas of the scintillator and received through direct transmission through the interference optical filter by another one of the areas of the photosensor different from the one corresponding to the particular one of the areas of the scintillator.
These and other aspects of the invention are apparent from and will be elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter. In the drawings,
It should be noted that items which have the same reference numbers in different Figures, have the same structural features and the same functions, or are the same signals. Where the function and/or structure of such an item has been explained, there is no necessity for repeated explanation thereof in the detailed description.
RR which impinges on the radiation detector 10 at the first side S1 is detected by the radiation detector 10 and converted into a radiographic image that may be used to diagnose a condition of the patient. The radiation detector 10 includes a scintillator 15 to convert the incident radiation RR (e.g. X-ray radiation) into converted radiation CR (e.g. photon) and a photosensor 20 arranged at a second side S2 of the radiation detector 10 opposite to the first side S1 to receive the converted radiation CR from the scintillator 15. The radiation detector 10 further includes an interference optical filter 25 arranged between the scintillator 15 and the photosensor 20. The photosensor 20 receives the converted radiation CR and translates the converted radiation CR into an image that may be further processed or displayed. The converted radiation CR has typically a longer wavelength range than the incident radiation RR. The longer wavelength range of the converted radiation CR may correspond to the wavelength range that can be detected by the photosensor 20. The scintillator 15 may be a CsI:Tl (Caesium Iodide doped with thallium) scintillator. In fact CsI:Tl scintillators are highly efficient radiation converter elements in the X-ray range. CsI:Tl scintillators are capable of absorbing radiation in the X-ray range with high efficiency, partly preventing that the incident radiation RR hits the photosensor, i.e. in other words CsI:Tl scintillators have a so called high X-ray stopping power. Further to that CsI:Tl scintillators convert the incident radiation RR into the converted radiation CR with high efficiency, i.e. CsI:Tl scintillators have a high conversion efficiency.
Areas of the scintillator 15 on which the incident radiation RR impinges are intended to be imaged onto corresponding areas of the photosensor 20. For example and as shown in
The interference optical filter 25 shown in
By way of comparison the solution proposed in the prior art document U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 requires absorber plates between the scintillator elements and a specific construction of the intermediate layer to limit light quanta spreading through multiple reflections in the intermediate layer while the present invention reduces lateral optical crosstalk by using exclusively the interference optical filter 25. The scintillator 15 used in the radiation detector 10 of the present invention may be any type of scintillator and is not limited to a plurality of scintillator elements as instead used by the solution proposed in the prior art document U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,186 B1 wherein a space between the scintillator elements is filled with an absorber material to prevent the direct lateral optical crosstalk.
Compared to US2012/0256095 the present invention discloses a simpler radiation detector 10. In the present invention the converted radiation CR which is converted after impinging on the scintillator 15 at the first side S1 of the scintillator 15 opposite to the second side S2 wherein the photosensor is arranged, does not need to travel twice a thickness d of the scintillator 15 before impinging on the photosensor 15. The solution proposed in US2012/0256095 requires that the converted radiation which is spreading away from an originating area in the scintillator travels twice a distance equivalent to the thickness of the scintillator. The radiation detector 10 disclosed in the present invention thus may have a better conversion efficiency because less converted radiation CR in the scintillator 15 may be lost before impinging on the photosensor 20 in the travel from the originating area in the scintillator to the photosensor 20. The solution proposed in US2012/0256095 additionally requires two reflector layers operating at different wavelength ranges in order to let the converted radiation which is spreading away from the originating area of the scintillator to be reflected back to the originating area of the scintillator. In the present invention it is sufficient that the interference optical filter 25 is constructed to attenuate a portion of the converted radiation CR originating at the particular area A1 of the scintillator 15, travelling inside the scintillator 15, impinging on the interference optical filter 25 and received by the photosensor 20 via direct transmission through the interference optical layer 25 at an area A3 of the photosensor 20 different from the area A2 of the photosensor 20 which corresponds to the particular area A1 of the scintillator 15.
In another embodiment according to the invention the interference optical filter 25 may be further constructed to transmit a portion of the converted radiation CR within a desired wavelength range to the photosensor 20 and to reflect or absorb the converted radiation CR outside the desired wavelength range. The scintillator 15 may have a specific emission wavelength band, i.e. a wavelength range within which the converted radiation CR is emitted inside the scintillator 15. For example in the case of thallium doped Cesium Iodide scintillators, the specific emission wavelength band is in a range between 400 and 800 nm with a peak emission wavelength of 550 nm. The photosensor 20 may also have a specific sensitivity wavelength band, i.e. a wavelength range within which the photosensor 20 is able to receive the converted radiation CR with high sensitivity and convert the converted radiation CR into electrical signals. As a consequence, the desired wavelength range within which the interference optical filter 25 transmits a portion of the converted radiation CR to the photosensor 20 and outside which the interference optical filter 25 reflects or absorbs the converted radiation CR, may correspond to a product of the specific emission wavelength band of the scintillator 15 and the specific sensitivity wavelength band of the photosensor 20. For example, the desired wavelength range of the interference optical filter 25 may be in a range between 350 nm and 650 nm or in a range of wavelengths lower than 650 nm.
It should be noted that according to what is previously mentioned, the interference optical filter 25 transmits a portion of the converted radiation CR within the desired wavelength range in a percentage that is decreasingly a function of a distance between the area A3 on which the spread converted radiation CR impinges on the photosensor 20, and the area A2 of the photosensor 20 corresponding to the particular area A1 of the scintillator 15.
With reference to
With reference to
In another example according to the invention the interference optical filter 25 may be constructed to increasingly attenuate a portion of the converted radiation CR within the desired wavelength range in function of an increasing angle of incidence of the converted radiation CR with the interference optical filter 25 at said another one A3 of the areas of the photosensor 20. A larger angle of incidence αi of the converted radiation CR with the interference optical filter 25 indicates a larger spread of the converted radiation CR with respect to the area A2 of the photosensor 10. When the interference optical filter 25 is constructed to increasingly attenuate a portion of the converted radiation CR in function of an increasing angle of incidence αi with the interference optical filter 25, the lateral optical crosstalk of the converted radiation CR may be further reduced. The interference optical filter 25 may be thus constructed to attenuate in a lesser proportion the converted radiation CR with smaller angle of incidence αi with the interference optical filter 25 in which case the converted radiation CR within the desired wavelength range may be received by the photosensor 20 in a way that a greater part of the transmission of the converted radiation CR towards the photosensor 20 may be confined around the corresponding area A2 of the photosensor 20, i.e. in this example within the crystal column C1 of the columnar scintillator 15.
In another embodiment according to the invention the interference optical filter 25 may be further constructed to reflect a portion of the converted radiation CR within the desired wavelength range in function of an increasing angle of incidence αi of the converted radiation CR with the interference optical filter 25 at said another one A3 of the photosensor 20. In this way the converted radiation CR within the desired wavelength range and with a large angle of incidence αi may be reflected back into the columnar scintillator 15. The reflected converted radiation CR may be available to be re-used by the columnar scintillator 15 as additional converted radiation CR and to be received by the photosensor 20 in the vicinity of the corresponding area A2.
It should be noted that alternatively to the interference optical filter 25 with the transmission spectrum curve shown in
The interference optical filter 25 so far described may be constructed as a stack of at least two layers having alternatingly a relatively higher refraction index and a relatively lower refraction index. The at least two layers in the stack may be at least a caesium iodide layer and a zinc sulphide layer. The caesium iodide layer may be a first layer of the stack of the at least two layers with the relatively higher refraction index. A second layer of the stack interfacing the caesium iodide layer (e.g. a zinc sulphide layer) may be a layer of the stack with the relatively lower refraction index. The interference optical filter 25 may be constructed with more than two layers of any suitable type having alternatingly a relatively higher refraction index and a relatively lower refraction index.
The interference optical filter 25 may encompass a large stack of so called Fabry-Perot interference cavities with a bandpass property. It is a known property of these so called Fabry-Perot interference cavities that for large incident angles of the converted radiation CR with a surface, a cut-off wavelength of the interference optical filter 25 shifts toward lower wavelengths, thereby reflecting the converted radiation CR for these incident angles beyond this cut-off wavelength. Absorption of the interference optical filter 25 at large incident angles may be enhanced by the introduction of a metal layer in the stack of the at least two layers having alternatingly a high refraction index and a lower refraction index. The interference optical filter 25 may be constructed with the stack of at least two layers with or without an intermediate metal layer such that net transmission of the converted radiation CR generated in the columnar scintillator 15 may be sufficiently large in order not to reduce sensitivity of the radiation detector 10, 11 or 12 to an unacceptable value, i.e. for example to a value less than 90%.
The radiation detector 10, 11 or 12 so far described through
The radiation detector 10 presented in
The interference optical filter 25 may be directly coupled to the photosensor 20, e.g. attached to the photosensor 20 with a bonding substance transparent to the converted radiation CR. Alternatively the interference optical filter 25 may be coupled to the photosensor 20 via an optical layer 35 attached to the photosensor 20, e.g. a fiber optical plate attached to the photosensor 20 with glue transparent to the converted radiation CR. In any of these two last alternative cases the scintillator layer 15 may be grown directly on the interference optical filter 25. Alternatively in case the interference optical filter 25 is directly coupled to the photosensor 20, an optical layer 35 may be provided directly on top of the interference optical filter 25. In this latter case the scintillator layer 15 may be grown directly on top of the optical layer 35.
Additionally, the method of manufacturing the radiation detector 11 may include after the step of growing the scintillator layer 15, the step of: providing a reflector 30 arranged at the first side S1 of the radiation detector 11. The reflector 30 is transparent to the incident radiation RR and constructed to reflect back to the scintillator 15 a portion of the converted radiation CR directed towards the first side S1 of the radiation detector 11. The reflector 30 may be constructed in a similar way as the interference optical filter 25, i.e. to increasingly attenuate a portion of the converted radiation CR in function of an increasing angle of incidence of the portion of the converted radiation CR with the reflector 30. In this way the portion of the converted radiation CR impinging on the reflector 30 with a large angle of incidence may be attenuated and not reflected back to the scintillator layer 15. Alternatively the reflector 30 may reflect the portion of the converted radiation CR impinging on the reflector 30 with a large angle of incidence such that the this portion of the converted radiation CR may be reflected back to the area A2 of the photosensor 20 corresponding to the particular area A1 of the scintillator layer 15 wherein the converted radiation CR is generated.
The radiation detector 10 presented in
Said method of detecting the incident radiation RR may additionally include the step of reflecting back to the scintillator 15 with a reflector 30 at the first side S1 of the radiation detector 11 and transparent to the incident radiation RR, a portion of the converted radiation CR directed towards the first side S1 of the radiation detector 11. This portion of converted radiation CR impinging on the reflector 30 at a side of the scintillator 15 may be primary and/or secondary converted radiation CR, i.e. converted radiation CR directly impinging on the reflector 30 from an originating area Al of the scintillator wherein the converted radiation CR is generated and/or converted radiation CR impinging on the reflector 30 after one or multiple reflections between the reflector 30 and the optical interference filter 25.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments. For example it should be note that the particular area A1 of the columnar scintillator 15, the corresponding area A2 of the photosensor 20 and the another one area A3 of the photosensor are merely illustrative example areas used to explain the effect reached by the solution provided in the present invention. This effect is clearly not limited to these specific areas but to any other areas or regions of the columnar scintillator 15 or the photosensor 20 with equivalent properties.
In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. Use of the verb “comprise” and its conjugations does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those stated in a claim. The article “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/067606 | 8/26/2013 | WO | 00 |