The invention relates to a shell for use in blasting.
Blasting is a common technique in mining for fracturing a substrate, such as rock, to facilitate excavation and removal. Blasting involves controlled explosions, typically using shells that contain an explosive charge that is initiated by a detonator. A detonator is a device for initiating an explosive, and may be in the form of an explosive device that has transmission wires/leads attached to initiate the explosive from a remote position on the surface. The explosive charge is primed with the detonator sitting in the explosive or explosive cavity region, with the transmission wires/leads protruding outside the shell and any attached anchoring devices up to the surface of the blasthole.
There exists a problem in that the reliability of operation of the shell may be detrimentally impacted where a detonator is not positioned up against an end of a cavity within a booster shell. This positioning increases the chance of a misfire and potentially reduces booster output. Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a shell design which allows detonators having different lengths to be securely enclosed and positioned in a correct location inside the booster shell.
In embodiments, the present invention seeks to provide a shell which overcomes or at least alleviates one or more disadvantages associated with existing shells.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a shell for use in blasting, the shell comprising an elongated body, the elongated body having a distal end arranged for housing an explosive material, a proximal end arranged to permit introduction of at least one detonator into an interior of the shell, and a cavity for holding the at least one detonator in a location in which operation of the detonator results in explosion of the explosive material, wherein a slot is provided in a sidewall of the shell to allow an activation lead connected to the detonator to pass through the slot to an exterior of the shell, and wherein the slot includes at least one retaining protrusion to retain the activation lead against withdrawal of the activation lead from the slot.
The shell may include a plurality of retaining protrusions along the slot to provide a plurality of positions along the slot at which the activation lead can be retained. The retaining protrusions may be at regular spaced intervals along the slot. In one form, the retaining protrusions are along only one side of the slot and an opposite side of the slot includes a smooth wall adapted to bear against the activation lead while the activation lead is drawn inwardly along the slot past one or more of the retaining protrusions.
The retaining protrusions may be in the form of a series of angled/barbed teeth to facilitate movement of the activation lead into the slot and to restrain the activation lead against movement out of the slot.
In one form, the slot includes a proximal barb on an opposite side of the slot to the at least one retaining protrusion and wherein the proximal barb laterally overlaps the retaining protrusion across the width of the slot.
The elongated body may be arranged for insertion and explosion in a hole.
The retaining protrusion may be adapted to hold the detonator in a location in which operation of the detonator results in explosion of the explosive material.
The retaining protrusions may be adapted to hold a range of detonators of different lengths in a location in which a distal end of the detonator is positioned against an end of the cavity such that operation of the detonator results in explosion of the explosive material. The retaining protrusions may be adapted to accommodate any length of detonator, such as, for example detonators ranging from a length of about 64 mm to about 99 mm.
In one form, the slot extends longitudinally along the sidewall from an opening of the slot at the proximal end of the sidewall.
The lead may be in the form of an activation wire. Alternatively, the lead may be in the form of a shock-tube for a non-electric detonator.
The invention is described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
More specifically, with reference to
As depicted in
The retaining protrusions 30 are in the form of a series of angled/barbed teeth to facilitate movement of the activation lead 28 into the slot 24 and to restrain the activation lead 28 against movement out of the slot 24. More particularly, the retaining protrusions 30 serve to restrain the activation lead 28 against movement out of the slot 24, in a direction longitudinally of the slot 24. As depicted clearly in
In examples of the invention, teeth/barbs may be positioned on alternating sides of the slot 24. The benefit of having teeth/barbs on alternate sides is to secure the lead better. The drawback will be that it may slow down the insertion process and the likelihood of lead/tube damage can be higher. The proximal barb 36 should be on the opposite side of the slot 24 for a design in which all teeth are on the one side, or on the alternating side from the first tooth in the case of alternating teeth.
The elongated body 12 is generally circular in cross-section and is generally cylindrical in shape to facilitate insertion and explosion in a hole. The distal end 14 may have a tapered, rounded or pointed end to facilitate insertion in a blast hole.
With reference to
More specifically,
As will be appreciated, the first tooth, or proximal barb 36, is reversed to act as a safety stop to help prevent a lead from completely exiting the slot 24 if it is pulled hard enough in the wrong direction. The slot 24 still allows for simple intentional removal of detonators, if required.
In addition to the smooth finish on the opposite side of the teeth, the intentional removal is also facilitated by the round teeth shape instead of sharp teeth which are purposely designed in such way to allow detonators be removed without damage to the lead. This feature may be required in mining applications, in particular in situations where charge crews will be in a hurry to charge a last development face with very limited time left before the end of a working shift or the end of a working day. Typically, primers are assembled while waiting for drilling to be finished. More often than not, this results in more assembled primers than is necessary or an inappropriate delay number assembled. At the end of their shift, the workers need to disassemble the primers which are to be returned to the magazine. This disassembly may be done more efficiently by using the present invention.
The slot 24 ensures detonators can be fully inserted to the end of the cavity (or det-well), and the teeth retain the detonator position against the end of the cavity 22. As will be appreciated from
Advantageously, the new detonator locking design of an explosives booster and primer described herein provides an integral fastening means for positive retention of different types of tubes including shock tubes for non-electric detonators, leg wires for electric detonators and lead wires for electronic detonators. The design allows the detonator caps made from different shell lengths to be securely enclosed and positioned inside the booster. The design ensures that the bottom of the detonator base charge is in direct contact with the booster composition (no offset of detonator bottom to end of det-well (or “cavity”), which ensures the effective and reliable detonation of boosters.
In any booster, the effect of detonator stand-off can have a detrimental impact on booster reliability, increasing the chance of a misfire and reducing booster output. A detonator stand-off occurs when the base charge of a detonator is positioned with a gap between the end of the detonator, and the end of the det-well in the booster. Using a single booster design with many different available detonator lengths means the shorter detonators have an almost certain chance of detonator stand-off as they cannot be held and retained against the end of the det-well which is made long enough to suit the longest detonators. When a short detonator is inserted in to the det-well, the tension applied to the shock tube or wire during the priming procedure immediately pulls the short detonators to the top of the det-well resulting in a det stand-off of up to 35 mm. Solving this problem for the shell illustrated has highlighted that the resulting solution could also be applied to other booster designs to prevent stand-off.
The example of the invention shown in the drawings features a slot down one side of the det-well. The slot has angled teeth down one side of it. When a short detonator is inserted into det-well, the user clicks the shock tube or wire (lead) down through the teeth in the slot. The shorter the detonator, the more teeth the lead will click through and the further down the slot the lead will go. Once the detonator bottoms out at the end of the det-well, the lead cannot click down through any further teeth and it is retained in this position by the last tooth it clicked through. With the lead being retained by the teeth means the detonator cannot slide backwards in the det-well and therefore no detonator stand-off is likely to exist.
The profile of the teeth has been the focus of development to achieve a solution that allows for simple insertion of the lead, yet still retains the lead adequately to prevent it coming loose during deployment of the booster. For the occasional time when a user must remove the detonator from the booster, this can be done by flexing the slot open (the plastic material allows for enough flexibility) and sliding the lead backwards out of the slot which then drags the detonator out of the det-well. The slot only has teeth on one side to facilitate simple intentional removal of the lead as it allows the lead to slide backwards against a smooth surface. As mentioned above, this simple intentional removal is also facilitated by the round teeth shape instead of sharp teeth which are purposely designed in such way to allow detonators be removed without damage to the lead.
The tooth closest to the open end of the slot is on the opposite side of the slot to the other teeth and has more reverse angle to it. The purpose of this tooth is to retain the lead for the longest detonator, but it also acts as a safety stop in the event that an already inserted lead is pulled with excessive force towards the open end of the slot, even if the lead slips back through the teeth, it will be caught by this last tooth to prevent the detonator completely separating from the booster. In this event a detonator stand-off will have been created however the booster should still fire, just with reduced reliability compared to a zero stand-off detonator position.
Insertion of the detonator may be faster than with existing booster designs. More specifically, insertion may be faster with this new design than the traditional booster design with two det-wells, commonly one “blind” or “stepped” det-well and another “through” det-well. When a detonator is inserted into a traditional booster, it is pushed through the “through” det-well then pushed into the second det-well, “blind” or “stepped”. With the new tooth design feature, the detonator is simply pushed down and then locked into place. Examples of the present invention may also prevent the detonators from rattling in the det-well which is an issue in current booster designs. A safety advantage is the increased booster reliability, meaning less chance of a misfire event. As will be appreciated, misfires are a significant safety and financial risk.
The reference in this specification to any prior publication (or information derived from it), or to any matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as an acknowledgment or admission or any form of suggestion that that prior publication (or information derived from it) or known matter forms part of the common general knowledge in the field of endeavour to which this specification relates.
Throughout this specification and the claims which follow, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step or group of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer or step or group of integers or steps.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014 902 540 | Jul 2014 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2015/054946 | 7/1/2015 | WO | 00 |