Patent Grant
10105248
Stent graft delivery systems have been designed to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to minimize the diameter or “French” size of the portion to be inserted into the patient. This usually results in severe compression of very large stents into small diameter tubes or catheters. The drastic inward compression results in high longitudinal forces for loading the stent graft—pushing the pre-compressed stent into the delivery system sheath—and in high deployment forces—occurring when the stent graft is unsheathed at the time of clinical deployment. Other factors cumulatively add to this deployment force including, for example, friction between components of the delivery system handle and the amount of tortuosity in which the sheath is navigated through the patient's vessels.
Deployment accuracy is a term referring to the ability of a physician to choose a target site for stent graft placement within the patient and the ability to “accurately” deliver the stent at the implantation site, the accuracy being measured with respect to both the longitudinal and rotational position of the stent graft. High deployment forces reduce a physician's ability to control deployment accuracy. Other factors can adversely affect deployment accuracy and present additional problems that the physician must address or for which the physician must compensate. These include quality of viewing equipment (fluoroscopy) and rapid blood flow. It would be desirable, therefore, to provide a system that increases stent graft deployment accuracy.
“Pin-and-pull” is a term that has been used in the art to describe many early types of stent/stent graft delivery systems. In pin-and-pull systems, there are two main components: an inner support catheter (e.g., a tube or a rod); and an outer sheath. The outer sheath longitudinally slides over the inner support catheter and can be freely rotated around the inner support catheter (i.e., rotation is independent of longitudinal outer sheath motion). To load a stent graft therein, the inner support catheter is drawn proximally (towards user) so that an interior chamber is created at the distal end of the outer sheath. The stent graft is compressed radially and inserted into this chamber so that the outer sheath houses the compressed stent graft inside its distal end. In this configuration, the inner support catheter prevents the stent graft from moving in a direction towards the physician (proximally) when the outer sheath is retracted. Deployment of the stent graft occurs naturally when the outer sheath is retracted because the individual stents of the stent graft have an outward bias towards their respective fully expanded state.
When the physician is using a pin-and-pull device, the stent graft is maneuvered to the deployment site using fluoroscopy, for example. At this point, the physician is prepared to release the stent graft. The stent graft is deployed in the vessel by “pinning” the inner support catheter relative to the patient and “pulling” back on the outer sheath—thus deriving from these actions the “pin-and-pull” nomenclature.
Because the outer sheath is compressing the stent graft, movement of the outer sheath towards the physician tends to draw the stent graft in this direction. Thus, without the inner support catheter, the stent graft will not be deployed. Minimizing the deployment force allows the sheath to retract with greater ease. It is, therefore, desirable to have the sheath retract as easily as possible.
With high deployment forces, the physician has less control over the placement accuracy. The highest deployment force occurs when the sheath first begins to retract. Once the user has overcome the initial friction between the sheath and the compressed stent, the force then needed for deployment plummets. This rapid decline is almost instantaneous and, often, the physician is not able to react quickly enough to lower the force being supplied to the delivery system. This failure to react results in deployment of more of the stent graft than intended by the physician or in a deployment that fails to hit the intended target site (i.e., low deployment accuracy).
Some mechanisms have been employed to add control to stent graft deployment and minimize this rapid release of stored energy within the delivery system. These mechanisms include screw-type retraction of the stent sheath and/or incorporation of “stops” which prevent inadvertent release of the stent. The screw-type mechanisms slow down the release of the stored energy and help maintain better control of stent release. These screw-type mechanisms also can impart a mechanical advantage by converting the linear force to a torque force. Stop-type mechanisms do not affect conversion or lowering of the deployment force, but help by preventing any over-compensation of the force and any instantaneous release of the force. Neither of these, however, significantly increase deployment accuracy and an improvement in performance would be desirable.
Modular disassociation creates serious type III endoleaks, which can have significant clinical consequences. Creating a mechanical interaction, the modular pull out force will exceed clinical requirements. This type of securement significantly reduces the likelihood of this event. Also, this system does not require rotational alignment between the receiving and inserting components. This makes the mechanism substantially invisible to the doctor and does not add any complexity to the procedure. Further, the system prevents adverse complications during the procedure. By using a proximally facing fold in the graft, there is virtually no chance of accidental ensnarement of a guide wire during the procedure. (If loops or holes were placed in the first member, then a guidewire could potentially get caught without the physician being aware of that ensnarement.) Moreover, the folds in the graft create extra layers of material. Thus, if a securing component were to wear through some of the graft, there multiple layers of the graft will remain to prevent an endoleak. This includes the layer of graft on the inserting member. It is unlikely that wearing of the graft to create an endoleak would occur in both the catheter and catheter direction through three to four layers of material. Significantly, by having multiple engaging members of the second (inserting) stent graft, there is redundancy in the vessel repair system. Therefore, even if some members miss the pockets or even if some members fracture, the overall integrity of the system will still be intact. Further redundancy in the vessel repair system is present by providing multiple sets of folds in the first component. These folds can be at the very end of the stent graft as well as multiple folds moving up the length of the stent graft. This configuration and variants thereof can cover any leg prosthesis stent graft.
Thus, there is a need to develop new, useful and effective delivery systems, components and methods to treat AAA.
The present invention relates to delivery systems, components of delivery systems and methods of using the delivery systems and its components to treat vascular damage, in particular AAA.
In an embodiment, the invention is an apex capture device, comprising a proximal apex capture portion that includes a nose, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint that is substantially parallel to a major axis of the proximal capture portion, and a plurality of tines extending distally from the nose, the tines radially distributed about the major axis radial to a most proximal radial restraint and substantially parallel to the major axis; a distal apex capture portion defining slots distributed radially about the major axis, the slots mateable with the tines by relative movement of the proximal and distal apex capture portions along the major axis; a plurality of bosses extending radially from the major axis between the nose and the distal apex capture portion and aligned with the slots along the major axis in non-interfering relation with movement of the tines into mating relation with the slots; an elongate member to which the distal apex capture portion is fixed, the elongate member extending through the proximal apex capture portion and the plurality of bosses; and a catheter to which the proximal apex capture portion is fixed, through which the elongate member extends, whereby movement of the catheter causes movement of the proximal apex capture portion along the major axis between a first position, in which the tines are mated with the slots and overlie the bosses, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses.
In another embodiment, the invention is a method of releasing a bare stent of a stent graft, comprising the steps of moving a catheter to which a proximal apex capture portion of an apex capture device is fixed, the proximal apex capture portion defining a radial restraint, along a major axis between a first position, in which tines of the proximal apex capture portion are mated with slots of a distal apex capture portion and overlie bosses extending radially from a major axis of the apex capture device, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses, thereby releasing apices of a bare stent from a space defined by the tines, the bosses and the distal apex capture portion.
In a further embodiment, the invention is an apex capture device assembly, comprising a proximal apex capture portion that includes a nose, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint that is substantially parallel to a major axis of the proximal capture portion, and a plurality of tines extending distally from the nose, the tines radially distributed about the major axis radial to a most proximal radial restraint and substantially parallel to the major axis; a distal apex capture portion defining slots distributed radially about the major axis, the slots mateable with the tines by relative movement of the proximal and distal apex capture portions along the major axis; a plurality of bosses extending radially from the major axis between the nose and the distal apex capture portion and aligned with the slots along the major axis in non-interfering relation with movement of the times into mating relation with the slots; an elongate member to which the distal apex capture portion is fixed, the elongate member extending through the proximal apex capture portion and the plurality of bosses; a catheter to which the proximal apex capture portion is fixed, through which the elongate member extends, whereby movement of the catheter causes movement of the proximal apex portion along the major axis between a first position, in which the tines are mated with the slots and overlie the bosses, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses; a bare stent that includes struts linked by apices, the struts extending between the tines, a portion of the apices extending between the bosses and the distal apex capture portion when the times are mated to the slots; and at least one suprarenal barb extending from the stent into the radial restraint.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft system, comprising a luminal graft component; a bare stent component including a plurality of struts joined by proximal and distal apices connecting the struts, the bare stent component fixed to a proximal end of the luminal graft component and extending proximally from the proximal end; an infrarenal stent component proximate to the bare stent component, wherein the infrarenal stent component is distal to the bare stent component and spans a circumferential line defined by apices of the bare stent component fixed to the luminal graft component; at least one suprarenal barb extending distally from at least one suprarenal portion of the bare stent component; and at least one infrarenal barb extending distally from at least one infrarenal portion of the bare stent.
In another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft delivery system, comprising a handle that includes a distal grip, and a handle body extending from one end of the distal grip, the handle defining a conduit and a track along a portion of the length of the distal grip and the handle body; an internal lead screw assembly within the track, the internal lead screw assembly being moveable along a major axis of the conduit, and including a threaded portion that extends through the track; a lead screw nut that extends about the handle body and threadably engaged with the threaded portion of the internal lead screw assembly, whereby rotation of the lead screw nut while abutting the distal grip causes movement of the internal lead screw assembly relative to the handle and wherein the lead screw nut simultaneously is slidable along the handle body while engaged with the internal lead screw assembly, thereby providing at least two mechanisms for causing movement of the internal lead screw assembly relative to the handle.
An additional embodiment of the invention is a slider for a stent graft delivery system, the slider comprising a slider body defining a central orifice through which a support member extends and a flush valve orifice extending substantially normal to the central orifice, the slider body being detachably fixable to an internal lead screw assembly; a slider cap coupled to a proximal end of the slider body, the slider cap defining a central orifice that is substantially aligned with the central orifice of the slider body and through which the support member extends; a sheath extending from a distal end of the slider cap, the sheath defining a catheter that is substantially aligned with the central opening of the slider body and through which the support member extends and a valve at the central orifice that provides hemostasis to the sheath. Optionally, the slide can include a wiper valve at the central opening of the slider body proximal to the flush valve orifice, the wiper valve forming a seal about the support member; an x-valve at the central opening of the slider body proximal to the wiper valve, the x-valve forming a seal about a catheter upon withdrawal of the support member from the slider body; and a sheath valve at the central opening of the slider body and proximal to the x-valve, the sheath valve being operable by activation of the slider cap to seal the central opening.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft system, comprising a first stent graft that includes a first luminal graft component, a plurality of outside stents extending along and fixed to an outside surface of the first luminal graft component, and an inside stent between two outside stents, one of which is at a distal end of the first luminal graft component, the inside stent fixed to an inside surface of the first luminal graft component, and having a plurality of barbs pointed generally proximally within the first luminal graft component; and a second stent graft that includes a second luminal graft component and a plurality of outside stents extending along and fixed to an outside surface of the first luminal graft component, whereby insertion of the second stent graft into the distal end of the first luminal graft component to overlap at least two stents of each of the first and second stent grafts will cause interfering relation between at least a portion of the barbs with a stent or the second luminal graft component of the second stent graft.
Another embodiment of the invention is a stent graft system, comprising a luminal graft component; a bare stent extending from a proximal end of the luminal graft component; at least one proximal barb extending distally from a proximal end of the bare stent; and at least one distal barb extending distally from a distal end of the bare stent, the distance between the proximal and distal barbs along a major axis of the luminal graft component being in a range of between about 6 mm and about 40 mm.
An additional embodiment of the invention is a leg clasp, comprising a barrel; a spool extending from the barrel along a major axis of the barrel; and a rim at an end of the spool, the rim having a diameter greater than that of the spool but less than that of the barrel.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft delivery system, comprising a leg clasp that includes a barrel, a spool extending from the barrel along a major axis of the barrel, and a rim at an end of the spool, the rim having a diameter greater than that of the spool but less than that of the barrel; a support tube fixed to the barrel and extending from the barrel in a direction opposite that of the spool; and a sheath having an internal diameter greater than that of the barrel and slideably moveable between a first position that covers the spool and rim and a second position that exposes the spool and rim.
A further embodiment of the invention is a stent graft system, comprising a luminal graft component; a bare stent of angled struts joined by proximal and distal apices, and extending from a proximal end of the luminal graft component; a proximal stent adjacent the bare stent and within the luminal graft, the proximal stent including angled struts joined by apices; and at least one barb extending distally from a distal apex and through the luminal graft component.
In still another embodiment, the invention is a telescoping stent graft system, comprising a bifurcated first stent graft that includes a bifurcated first luminal graft component, a plurality of stents extending along and fixed to a surface of one of two legs of the bifurcated first luminal graft component; a second stent graft that includes a second luminal graft component and a plurality of stents extending along and fixed to a surface of the first luminal graft component, whereby the second stent graft can be inserted into the distal end of a first of two leg components of the bifurcated first luminal graft component to overlap at least two stents of each of the first and second stent grafts; a plurality of stents extending along and fixed to a surface of a second leg of the bifurcated first luminal stent graft, wherein the first leg is shorter than the second leg, and wherein the first leg includes at least one more stent than is required for overlap of at least two stents of the second stent graft.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is a method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, comprising steps of directing a sheath and distal tip of a delivery system to an abdominal aortic aneurysm of a patient through an artery of the patient, the sheath containing a bifurcated stent graft; rotating a lead screw nut of the delivery system that is threadably linked to the sheath to thereby retract the sheath at least partially from the bifurcated stent graft; and sliding the lead screw nut along a handle body of the delivery device while the lead screw nut is threadably linked to the sheath to thereby further retract the sheath, whereby the bifurcated stent graft is at least partially deployed in the abdominal aortic aneurysm, thereby treating the abdominal aortic aneurysm.
In still another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft delivery device, comprising, an apex capture device assembly that includes a proximal apex capture portion that includes a nose, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint that is substantially parallel to a major axis of the proximal capture portion and a plurality of tines extending distally from the nose, the tines radially distributed about the major axis radial to a most proximal radial restraint and substantially parallel to the major axis, a distal apex capture portion defining slots distributed radially about the major axis, the slots mateable with the times by relative movement of the proximal and distal apex capture portions along the major axis, a plurality of bosses extending radially from the major axis between the nose and the distal apex capture portion and aligned with the slots along the major axis in non-interfering relation with movement of the tines into mating relation with the slots, an elongate member to which the distal apex capture portion is fixed, the elongate member extending through the proximal apex capture portion and the plurality of bosses, a catheter to which the proximal apex capture portion is fixed, through which the elongate member extends, whereby movement of the catheter causes movement of the proximal apex portion along the major axis between a first position, in which the tines are mated with the slots and overlie the bosses, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses, a bare stent that includes struts linked by apices, the struts extending between the tines, a portion of the apices extending between the bosses and the distal apex capture portion when the tines are mated to the slots and at least one suprarenal barb extending from the stent into the radial restraint; and a leg clasp through which the elongate member and catheter extend, the leg clasp including, a barrel, a spool extending from the barrel along a major axis of the barrel, and a rim at an end of the spool, the rim having a diameter greater than that of the spool but less than that of the barrel.
An additional embodiment of the invention is an x-valve assembly, comprising an x-valve and a gasket supporting the x-valve.
The delivery systems, components of delivery systems and methods of the invention can be employed to treat aortic aneurysms, such as abdominal aortic aneurysms. Advantages of the claimed delivery systems, components of delivery devices and methods of the invention include, for example, the following.
Benefits achieved by the invention are represented, for example, by
By creating a mechanical interaction, the modular pull out force can exceed clinical requirements. Modular disassociation creates serious type III endoleaks, which can have significant clinical consequences. This type of securement significantly reduces the likelihood of this event. Also, this system does not require rotational alignment between the receiving and inserting components. This makes the mechanism substantially invisible to the doctor and does not add any complexity to the procedure. Further, the system prevents adverse complications during the procedure. By using a proximally facing fold in the graft, there is virtually no chance of accidental ensnarement of a guide wire during the procedure. If loops or holes were placed in the first member, then a guidewire could potentially get caught without the physician being aware of that ensnarement.
Moreover, the folds in the graft create extra layers of material. Therefore, even if a securing component were to wear through some of the graft, there still will be multiple layers of the graft left to prevent an endoleak. This includes the layer of graft on the inserting member. It is very unlikely that wearing of the graft to create an endoleak would occur in both the catheter and albumen direction through three to four layers of material. Significantly, by having multiple engaging members of the second (inserting) stent graft, there is redundancy in the vessel repair system. Therefore, even if some members miss the pockets or even if some members fracture, the overall integrity of the system will still be intact. Further redundancy in the vessel repair system is present by providing multiple sets of folds in the first component. These folds can be at the very end of the stent graft as well as multiple folds moving up the length of the stent graft. This configuration and variants thereof can cover any leg prosthesis stent graft.
In addition, barbs located at suprarenal and infrarenal positions, may provide positive fixation and the leg clasp of the invention may provide for accurate control of the graft systems during cannulation and placement of the graft system in the vasculature.
Thus, the delivery systems, components of delivery systems and methods of the invention can be used to treat AAA and, therefore, avoid complications and death consequent to life threatening vascular conditions.
The features and other details of the invention, either as steps of the invention or as combinations of parts of the invention, will now be more particularly described and pointed out in the claims. It will be understood that the particular embodiments of the invention are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principle features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
In an embodiment, represented by
Referring to
The internal lead screw assembly 5510 of the stent graft delivery system 5500 of the invention can define an opening essentially coaxial with the handle, wherein the support member extends through the internal lead screw assembly, as shown in
As can be seen in the inset of
The stent graft delivery system of the invention can further include a slider 5700. The slider 5700 of the stent graft delivery system comprises a slider body 5720 defining a central orifice through which the support member 5740 extends and a flush valve orifice 5712 extending substantially normal to the central orifice, the slider body 5720 being detachably fixable to the internal lead screw assembly 5510 (
In an embodiment, the x-valve assembly 5760 includes a nitinol gasket as shown in
“Proximal” means, when reference is made to a delivery system or a component of a delivery system, such as an apex capture device, a slider for a stent graft delivery system or a leg clasp, closest to the clinician using device. Likewise, “distal” means, when reference is made to a delivery system or a component of a delivery system, such as an apex capture device, a slider for a stent graft delivery system or a leg clasp, away from the clinician using the device.
When reference is made to a “stent” or a “stent graft system,” “proximal” means that end of the stent or stent graft system that is towards the head of the patient and “distal” means that end of the stent or stent graft system that is away from the head of the patient.
In another embodiment, the invention is a slider 5700 for a stent graft delivery system, the slider 5700 comprising a slider body 5720 defining a central orifice through which a support member 5740 extends and a flush valve orifice 5712 extending substantially normal to the central orifice, the slider body 5720 being detachably fixable to an internal lead screw assembly 5510 (
Referring now to
In an exemplary embodiment, the outer sheath control catheter 120 is an aluminum tube attached to a sheath hub 140, which is attached to the sheath 130. The inner catheter 110 is polycarbonate tube having a longitudinally cut slot 310 (e.g., see
An alternative embodiment to that illustrated in
One exemplary embodiment for connecting the outer sheath handle 710 to the inner screw handle 720 is illustrated in
Threads 726 extends for a longitudinal length that is greater than the amount that is necessary to overcome the greatest force required for stent graft deployment. Once that greatest point of force is overcome, the chance of handle jerk or slippage decreases and, therefore, the two handle portions 710, 720 can be moved longitudinally freely with respect to one another. To achieve the transition from longitudinal controlled and slow movement to longitudinal free movement (and speedy if desired), at the proximal end of the threads of the inner screw handle 720, screw channels 724 can be cut into the handle body to allow the threaded engagement device 716 to fall into one of the screw channels 724 and the threaded engagement device 714 to fall into the other channel (not illustrated) on the opposite side of the inner screw handle 720. A threaded engagement device 714 can be, for example, a ball screw, which would be desirable in this configuration because it can be used to center the threads against the relatively harder threaded engagement device 716, such as a set screw. Changing the force the threaded engagement devices 714, 716 impart against the threads can be accomplished by adjusting the tension on a ball of the ball set screw or by decreasing the depth of a set screw into the handle 710.
Functioning of the delivery system 700 is illustrated, for example, in the diagrams of
The delivery system 700 of
Benefits achieved by the telescopic configurations shown in
An alternative to the two-part controlled deployment of
A distal engagement portion 1612 of the outer sheath handle 1610 has an internally threaded bore for receiving therein a threaded portion 1622 of the inner screw handle 1620. In an exemplary embodiment, the distal engagement portion 1612 is made of DELRIN®. Engagement of the outer sheath handle 1610 to the inner screw handle 720 (
The threaded portion 1622 extends for a longitudinal length that is greater than the amount that is necessary to overcome greatest force required for stent graft deployment. Once that greatest point of force is overcome, the chance of handle jerk or slippage decreases and, therefore, the two handle portions 1610, 1620 can be moved longitudinally freely with respect to one another. To achieve the transition from longitudinal controlled and slow movement to longitudinal free movement (and speedy if desired), at the proximal end of the threads of the inner screw handle 1620, a channel 1626 (or more channels, e.g., two opposing channels) can be cut into the inner screw handle 1620. A non-illustrated set screw is located at the distal engagement portion 1612 to protrude into the interior and engage the threaded portion 1622. When the two handle portions 1610, 1620 are rotated sufficiently far to move the interiorly projecting set screw proximal of the threaded portion 1622, the set screw will ride directly into the channel 1626 (or the set screws directly into the channels 1626). A set screw is desirable in this configuration because it can be used to increase and decrease tension for rotating the two handle portions 1610, 1620 with respect to one another. Changing the force imparted against the threaded portion 1622 can be accomplished by decreasing/increasing the depth of the set screw into the distal engagement portion 1612.
Functioning of the delivery system 1600 is illustrated, for example, in the diagrams of
The delivery system 1600 of
A further alternative to the two- or multi-part controlled deployment of
As shown in
Significantly, the internal tube 2500 of the delivery system 2400 provides advantages to permit controlled deployment (unsheathing) of the stent graft. The internal tube 2500 in this exemplary embodiment is made from polycarbonate material and is sized so that it can move freely within the slotted aluminum handle body 2440. The slider assembly 2600 is sized so that it can move freely within the internal tube 2500. The internal tube 2500 has a straight tube running the full length of the delivery system 2400. Machined through the wall of the internal tube 2500 is the slot 2510 which is “jogged” in the manner of an automobile transmission shifter. As such, the circumferential or transverse portion 2514 of the jogged slot 2510 provides a so-called stop (or stops) that control deployment of the stent graft at different points during the stent graft deployment sequence. The jog(s) 2512 that is/are cut into the internal tube 2500 only allows the slider assembly 2600 to move within that particular jog segment of the internal tube 2500. Further retraction of the outer stent sheath 2610 requires the user to actively turn the end cap 2420 to a next setting, thus allowing further proximal movement of the slider assembly 2600. The boss 2700 of the slider assembly extends through the jogged slot 2510 of the internal tube 2500 and through the slot 2442 of the handle body 2440. The boss 2700 is, then, connected to the proximal handle grip 2410. The internal tube 2500 is attached at the distal end of the delivery system 2400 to the distal handle 2430. Rotation of the distal handle 2430 allows rotation of the internal tube 2500 within the handle body 2440.
Once the clinician identifies the deployment site and is ready to deploy the stent graft, he/she turns the distal handle 2430 until, for example, stop position 1 is obtained. With the device in stop position 1, the jogged slot 2510 of the internal tube 2500 and the slot 2442 of the handle body 2440 will be aligned, thus allowing the proximal handle grip 2410 to be slid proximally to allow partial stent graft deployment. Positioning of the next exemplary jog or stop on the internal tube 2500 is set so that the supra-renal struts and at least two stent graft springs (i.e., stents) are deployed from the outer stent sheath 2610. With the stent graft partially deployed, but with the suprarenal struts (i.e., of the bare stent) still captured in the distal clasp mechanism, the stent graft can still be maneuvered proximally or distally within the aorta to establish sealing site positioning.
At this point, the clinician can fix the delivery system 2400 relative to the patient to maintain the stent graft position relative to the aorta. Then, the clinician can move the distal handle 2430 to stop position 2 and continue to move the proximal handle grip 2410 in a proximal direction until, for example, the contralateral leg of a bifurcated stent graft is released from the outer stent sheath 2610. The stop on the delivery system 2400 at the end of stop position 2 can, in an exemplary embodiment, prevent the ipsilateral leg from deploying from the outer stent sheath 2610. Then, the clinician can rotate the delivery system 2400 to orient the stent graft's contralateral leg to align with the patient's arterial anatomy. Once the stent graft is oriented properly, the clinician can actuate the distal clasp assembly and release the suprarenal struts. The captured ipsilateral leg, along with the anchored supra-renal strut and proximal seal serve as fixation during crossing of the guidewire into the contralateral leg and subsequent placement of the contralateral leg graft placement. Once contralateral leg graft placement is achieved, the delivery system 2400 is moved to stop position 3 and the proximal handle grip 2410 is pushed proximally to fully release the stent graft. The particular placement/configuration of the stop positions is determined based upon various factors, including the size of the prosthesis and the features of the vessel in which the prosthesis is to be placed.
Yet another alternative to the multi-step controlled deployment of
An exemplary embodiment of a delivery system 3300 with an internal lead screw that deploys a stent graft from a sheath is shown beginning with
The support member 3360 is coaxially contained within the delivery system 3300. The support member 3360 is attached at its proximal end to the proximal end cap 3350 of the delivery system 3300. The support member 3360 travels coaxially through the internal lead screw 3310, the flush port, and the outer sheath 3370. At the distal end of the support member 3360 is a capture pod that holds the proximal (caudal) end of the stent graft. A guidewire catheter and the distal clasp assembly tubing (
The internal lead screw 3310 (
Attached to the distal end of the internal lead screw 3310 is a flush port (
During assembly of the delivery system 3300 (shown, in part, in
In use, the clinician first flushes the delivery system 3300 by forcing saline through the flush port. The saline fills the annular space between the outer sheath 3370 and the support member 3360, permeates through the crimped stent graft, and exits between the outer sheath 3370 and the flexible tip 4100. The o-ring in the flush port seals the hypotube of the support member 3360 and prevents leakage through the delivery system 3300. Then, the clinician feeds the delivery system 3300 over an indwelling guidewire and tracks the device to the stent graft deployment site.
At this point, the clinician has the option to either slowly release the stent graft by rotating the lead screw nut 3320 or rapidly release the stent graft by pulling back on lead screw nut 3320 and, thereby, sliding the internal lead screw 3310 down the lead screw rail 3330. At some point in the deployment of the stent graft, the release can be stopped to actuate the distal clasp assembly and release the leading struts (bare stent) of the stent graft. Because the stent graft is usually severely constrained within the outer sheath 3370, deployment forces with AAA devices can be quite high.
The internal lead screw of the invention has the advantage of incorporating a screw system to convert the linear force to a torque force. The torque force that the clinician must exert on the lead screw nut to deploy the stent graft is ergonomically less difficult than the linear pull force. In addition to the mechanical advantage obtained with the lead screw nut, the screw type mechanism allows for greater control in the release of the stent graft. In a linear pin-and-pull system, the largest force to deploy the stent graft is at the initial release of friction between the stent graft and the sheath. As soon as that initial friction is overcome, the deployment force quickly declines. From an ergonomic point of view, it is very difficult for a clinician to maintain control and speed of the deployment at the moment when the frictional forces are overcome. It is very common for the stent graft to be un-sheathed more than was desired due to this loss of control. A screw type mechanism according to the present exemplary embodiment allows the clinician to have more control over this initial release of the stent graft, which is a critical factor for stent placement accuracy.
The difference between
It is noted that the entire device disposed in the interior of the hollow distal grip handle 5530 shown in
A release 5514 (e.g., a thumbscrew) removably secures the slider 5700 inside the hollow distal grip handle 5530 and hollow interior body 5540 when the release is placed inside a blind hole 5722 of the slider body assembly 5720. With the release 5514 removed/actuated, all of the parts illustrated in
As the above delivery systems, a support member 5740 runs entirely through the slider body assembly 5720 and all the way back to the apex release device 5580. This support member 5740 needs to be sealed to the slider 5700 so that blood flow outside the member is not allowed. To effect this seal, a wiper gasket seal (also referred to herein as “wiper valve”) 5750 is provided inside the cavity of the slider body assembly 5720. The seal is enhanced with the use of an x-valve assembly 5760.
The apex capture device assembly of the invention can be employed in conjunction with the leg clasp of the invention, as shown in
In an embodiment, the invention is a stent graft delivery device, comprising, an apex capture device assembly, including (1) a proximal apex capture portion, including a nose, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint that is substantially parallel to a major axis of the proximal capture portion; and a plurality of tines extending distally from the nose, the tines radially distributed about the major axis radial to a most proximal radial restraint and substantially parallel to the major axis, (2) a distal apex capture portion defining slots distributed radially about the major axis, the slots mateable with the times by relative movement of the proximal and distal apex capture portions along the major axis, (3) a plurality of bosses extending radially from the major axis between the nose and the distal apex capture portion and aligned with the slots along the major axis in non-interfering relation with movement of the tines into mating relation with the slots, (4) an elongate member 8614, otherwise known as an inner control tube, to which the distal apex capture portion is fixed, the elongate member extending through the proximal apex capture portion and the plurality of bosses, (5) a catheter 8613, otherwise referred to as an outer control tube, to which the proximal apex capture portion is fixed, through which the elongate member extends, whereby movement of the catheter causes movement of the proximal apex portion along the major axis between a first position, in which the tines are mated with the slots and overlie the bosses, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses, (6) a bare stent that includes struts linked by apices, the struts extending between the tines, a portion of the apices extending between the bosses and the distal apex capture portion when the tines are mated to the slots and (7) at least one suprarenal barb extending from the stent into the radial restraint; and a leg clasp through which the elongate member and catheter extend, the leg clasp including, (1) a barrel, (2) a spool extending from the barrel along a major axis of the barrel, and (3) a rim at an end of the spool, the rim having a diameter greater than that of the spool but less than that of the barrel.
In another embodiment, the invention is an x-valve assembly, comprising an x-valve; and a gasket supporting the x-valve. The gasket includes a peripheral support and at least one arm extending inwardly from the peripheral support. In an embodiment, the gasket includes at least two pairs of arms, along intersecting major axes. In an embodiment, each pair of arms is aligned. At least two of the axes of the x-valve assembly can be normal to each other. The pairs of arms in the x-valve assembly can lie in a plane. The gasket of the x-valve assembly can include a superelastic metal, which can include nitinol.
X-valve assembly 5760 can be seen in greater detail in
As set forth above, the support member 5740 can be removed from within the slider 5700. While the wiper valve 5750 and the x-valve assembly 5760 form some or even a substantial measure of sealing capability, the blood-tight seal needs to be ensured. Accordingly, a sealing assembly is provided at the proximal end of the slider 5700, which sealing assembly is comprised, in one exemplary embodiment, of a sheath valve 5770, a sheath valve washer 5780, and a sheath valve knob 5790. As described in the following text, the sheath valve washer 5780 is not necessary but is included in this embodiment. The sheath valve 5770 here is formed as a cylindrical piece of silicone but can take any shape or material so long as, when compressed inside the slider body assembly 5720, it creates a blood-tight seal inside the blind hole 5722 of the slider body assembly 5720. With the configuration shown in
A passive hemostasis valve for the delivery systems 100, 700, 1600, 2400, 3300, 5500 can replace the sheath valve 5770 in the slider 5700 of
The above-described delivery systems 100, 700, 1600, 2400, 3300, 5500 each require the stent graft to be loaded within the outer sheath catheter and each have an interior device that both prevents the stent graft from being inserted too far into the outer sheath catheter and keeps the stent graft longitudinally fixed when the outer sheath is being retracted over the stent graft. When implanting a bifurcated stent graft, it is desirable to ensure that the last two springs (e.g., stents) of the ipsilateral leg are not prematurely released from the outer sheath during deployment. The invention, shown in
An additional embodiment of the invention shown in
The leg clasp 7001 of the invention can formed, at least in part, of at least one component selected from the group consisting of stainless steel, polyester, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). The rim 7006 of the leg clasp 7001 of the invention can include radially extending spokes 12502, as shown in
In still another embodiment, the invention is a stent graft delivery system, comprising a leg clasp 7001 that includes a barrel 7002, a spool 7004 extending from the barrel 7002 along a major axis of the barrel 7002 and a rim 7006 at an end of the spool 7004, the rim 7006 having a diameter greater than that of the spool 7004 but less than that of the barrel 7002; a support tube 7010 fixed to the barrel 7002 and extending from the barrel 7002 in a direction opposite that of the spool 7004; and an outer sheath 7030 (
The stent graft delivery system of the invention can further include a stent graft 7020, wherein a distal most stent 7024 of the stent graft extends about the spool 7004 in interfering relation with the rim 7006 when the outer sheath 7030 is in the first position, and a tubular graft component 7032 to which the stent is fixed extends between the rim and the sheath, whereby movement of the sheath from the first to the second position releases the stent graft from the leg clasp.
In particular, an indented boss 7000 is placed at the distal end of the push rod (also referred to herein as “support tube”) 7010, which prevents the stent graft 7020 from being inserted too far into the outer sheath 7030 and keeps the stent graft 7020 longitudinally fixed when the outer sheath 7030 is being retracted over the stent graft 7020. The indented boss 7000 has a proximal flange (also referred to herein as a “barrel”) 7002, an intermediate span (also referred to herein as a “spool”) 7004, and a distal flange (also referred herein as a “rim”) 7006. The outer diameters of the proximal and distal flanges 7002, 7006 are larger than the outer diameter of the intermediate span 7004 to create an annular cavity 7008 therebetween. If the stent graft leg 7022 is placed over the distal flange 7006 sufficiently far to have the distal-most stent 7024 within the annular cavity 7008, the indented boss 7000 creates an interference fit between the stent graft leg 7022 and the outer sheath 7030. Once the outer sheath 7030 is completely retracted, the interference fit disappears. It can be said that the fixation of the distal-most stent 7024 is passive due to the fact that, after the outer sheath 7030 is retracted, the fixation is lost. This configuration can be used to better control and grasp the stent graft 7020 by preventing longitudinal movement thereof when the outer sheath 7030 is retracted (to the left of
The following sections discuss improvements to stent grafts, in particular, bifurcated AAA stent grafts intended to span the renal arteries. As shown in
“Suprarenal,” as used herein in reference to a barb, means a barb that attaches to the aorta cranial to the ostium of the most superior renal artery.
“Infrarenal,” as used herein in reference to a barb, means a barb that attaches to the aorta caudal to the ostium of the most inferior renal artery.
In another embodiment, an infrarenal barb can be a first covered barb. Bare stent is also referred to as “uncovered” or “partially” covered stent.
“Barb” is also referred to herein as “hook.”
As shown in
The infrarenal barb 7230 of the stent graft system of the invention can extend from a distal apex 7213 that joins two struts 7211.
Exemplary distances between the most proximal point of the suprarenal and infrarenal barbs of the stent graft system of the invention is in a range of between about 6 mm and about 40 mm (e.g., 6 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, 25 mm, 30 mm, 35 mm, 40 mm).
At least one of the stents of the stent graft system of the invention can include a superelastic metal, such as nickel titanium.
In an embodiment, the distal apices of a bare stent of the stent graft system of the invention are fixed within the tubular graft component and wherein the infrarenal barb extends from the bare stent through the tubular graft component. At least one infrarenal stent of the invention can be fixed within the luminal graft component.
Another embodiment of the invention, shown in
Another embodiment, shown in
In the stent graft system of the invention, at least a portion of the barbs extend from the bare stent at an angle in a range of between about 20 degrees and about 60 degrees (e.g., 20 degrees, 25 degrees, 30 degrees, 35 degrees, 40 degrees, 45 degrees, 50 degrees, 55 degrees, 60 degrees).
A bare stent of the stent graft system of the invention can be formed, at least in part, of a superelastic metal.
As shown in
Stents of the invention can be of a size from about 20 mm to about 36 mm, and include, for example, 20 mm, 22 mm, 24 mm, 26 mm, 28 mm, 30 mm, 33 mm, and 36 mm.
The stent can be cut from a 3 mm OD tube, for example. The width of the can be equivalent (but not need be equivalent) to the circumference of a 3 mm tube. The tubing wall can be, for example, 0.017″.
Barbs can be bent out of plane and sharpened as part of a finishing process. All of the barbs, or only a subset of the barbs, may be included in the stent of the invention.
The bare stents described above are to be used with the delivery systems according to the invention, which systems include distal apex capture devices, an example of which is shown in
In an embodiment, the invention is an apex capture device 8600, comprising a proximal apex capture portion 8600a that includes a nose 8601, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint, such as a pilot holes, represented as 8011, in
“Radial restraint,” as used herein, means restricted movement in a direction normal to the major axis of the delivery system or the apex capture device, whereby, for example, a barb of a stent could be released between tines of the apex capture device.
“Non-interfering relation,” as used herein, means one object is moveable relative to another object.
The nose 8601 of the apex capture device of the invention can define grooves 8603 between the tines 8602, wherein the grooves 8603 are aligned with spaces between the bosses 8612.
In an embodiment, the plurality of bosses 8612 of the apex capture device of the invention are fixed relative to distal apex capture portion 8610.
The nose, elongate member and each of the tines 8602 of the apex capture device of the invention can define a space.
In another embodiment, the invention is a method of releasing a bare stent of a stent graft, comprising the steps of moving a catheter, to which a proximal apex capture portion of an apex capture device is fixed, the proximal apex capture portion defines a radial restraint, along a major axis between a first position, in which tines of the proximal apex capture portion are mated with slots of a distal apex capture portion and overlie bosses extending radially from a major axis of the apex capture device, and a second position, in which the tines are not mated with the slots and do not overlie the bosses, thereby releasing apices of a bare stent from a space defined by the tines, the bosses and the distal apex capture portion.
In an embodiment, the apex capture device employed in the method of releasing a bare stent of a stent graft can further include an elongate member to which the distal apex capture portion is fixed, the elongate member extending through the proximal apex capture portion and the plurality of bosses.
In another embodiment, the apex capture device employed in the methods of the invention can further include a catheter to which the proximal apex capture portion is fixed, through which the elongate member extends, and by which the proximal apex capture portion is moved.
In yet another embodiment, the invention is an apex capture device assembly 7600, comprising a proximal apex capture portion 7610 that includes a nose 7615, wherein the nose defines at least one radial restraint, such as a pilot hole, previously described, that is substantially parallel to a major axis of the proximal capture portion and a plurality of tines, previously described extending distally from the nose 7615, as shown, for example, in
The stent of the apex capture device assembly of the invention can further include at least one bridge between a pair of the struts to define an eyelet through which a boss extends when a tine is mated to a slot, and wherein the barb extends from the bridge.
In an alternative embodiment, shown in
Referring to both
The apex capture device of the invention can further include an infrarenal barb 7635 extending from a distal apex 7636 of the bare stent 7630.
The apex capture device assembly of the invention can further include a luminal graft component 7637 fixed to a distal portion of the bare stent 7630 and an infrarenal stent 7638 adjacent and distal to the bare stent 7630, the infrarenal stent 7638 including struts 7639 linked by proximal 7640 and distal 7641 apices, the distal apices 7641 being substantially aligned with distal apices 7636 of the bare stent 7630. In an embodiment, the infrarenal stent 7638 of the apex capture device assembly 7600 of the invention is fixed within the tubular graft component 7637. Distention of the bare stent struts 7631, 7634 consequent to retention of the suprarenal barbs 7632 within the radial restraint, such as a pilot hole 8011 (
For example, as shown in
Prior art Z-stents are made of a single length of wire joined at the two ends. Provided herein, and shown in an exemplary embodiment in
The multiple-stent 8900 is a wire form stent made from wire that is substantially smaller in diameter than used in prior art stents/stent grafts. In spite of this substantial reduction in diameter, the multiple turns around the circumference create a total metal cross-section on each strut of each stent similar to prior art stents. Having multiple turns in the multiple-stent 8900 creates multiple apices 8910 at each bend of the multiple-stent 8900. These apices can be used to improve implantation on an interior wall of a vessel to be treated. Additionally, each of these apices 8910 can be used to catch onto the graft material of a second modular component, for example, on the graft material of a second part of a bifurcated stent graft that is to be deployed in the iliac artery opposite the long downstream leg of the bifurcated stent graft. One particular use is that these apices 8910 can be used to catch onto opposing apices of a stent from the second modular component. The multiple-stent 8900 can be used in any overlap region. Variations of the multiple-stent 8900 can include wire diameter, overall number of apices as well as the number of turns (filaments) used.
The multiple-stent 8900 can be made from a single wire circumferentially repeated as shown in
To use the multiple-stent to connect two modular components of a stent-graft system, the graft and stent are assembled in a non-intuitive manner to achieve a high modular tensile strength. The graft is assembled such that its longitudinal length is shortened by folding the graft in on itself in a longitudinal direction. This is done so that the total effective graft is substantially unchanged, with respect to internal diameter. The ability to fold the graft in on itself is done by sewing consecutive leg stents further from one another than would normally be done.
These folds 9600 are placed in the areas of the stent graft that will receive modular components. Accordingly, the folds 9600 are made near the distal ends of stent graft components. These folds 9600 can be done at multiple points along the length, and can also be done at the very end, or at both locations. To keep the folds 9600 in place, longitudinal stitches are sewn through all the layers of the graft. These stitches are shown with reference “A” in
The multiple-stent that is attached to a graft is found at or near the proximal end of the inserting component. The multiple-stent is attached in a manner that leaves the distally facing apices 9800 unsewn, as shown in
The configuration shown in
The configuration shown in
The configuration shown in
Another exemplary embodiment of devices that can be used to connect into the pocket 9610 (
In still another embodiment, and referring to
The first tubular graft component 7840 of the stent graft system 7809 can be bifurcated and the inside stent 7860 located in one of two legs of the first tubular graft component 7840.
The stent graft system of the invention can further include a plurality of outside stents 7891 extending along and fixed to an outside surface of a second leg 7890 of the bifurcated first luminal graft, and a second inside stent 7892 between two outside stents, one of which is at a distal end 7893 of the second leg 7890, the second inside stent 7892 fixed to an inside surface of the second leg 7890 and having a plurality of barbs 7894 pointed generally proximally within the second leg 7890.
A third stent graft 7895, shown in
Stents of the stent graft system of the invention can be formed, at least in part, of a superelastic metal, such as nitinol.
The variation shown in
A further embodiment of the invention is a telescoping stent graft system, which is essentially identical to the stent graft system shown in
In an embodiment, one leg of the bifurcated stent graft of the invention can shorter in length (i.e., first or short leg) in the other leg (i.e., second or long leg) of the bifurcated stent graft, as shown in
As shown in
The delivery systems, components of delivery systems, stents, grafts and stent graft systems of the invention can be employed in methods of treating aortic aneurysms, such as abdominal aortic aneurysms.
In another embodiment, the invention is a method for treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm, comprising steps of directing a sheath and distal tip of a delivery system to an abdominal aortic aneurysm of a patient through an artery, such as a femoral artery that can subsequently pass through a common iliac artery, of the patient, the sheath containing a bifurcated stent graft; rotating a lead screw nut of the delivery system that is threadably linked to the sheath to thereby retract the sheath at least partially from the bifurcated stent graft; and sliding the lead screw nut along a handle body of the delivery device while the lead screw nut is threadably linked to the sheath to thereby further retract the sheath, whereby the bifurcated stent graft is at least partially deployed in the abdominal aortic aneurysm, thereby treating the abdominal aortic aneurysm.
The method of treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm can further including the step of opening a clasp at a distal end of the delivery device to release a bare stent at a proximal end of the bifurcated stent graft. A portion of a first leg of the bifurcated stent graft can be retained within the sheath when the clasp is opened to release the bare stent. The first leg of the bifurcated stent can be retained by fixing a stent at a distal end of the first leg between the sheath and a leg clasp. The first leg of the bifurcated is the longer of two legs of the bifurcated stent.
In another embodiment, the clasp employed in the method to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm can distend struts of the proximal stent toward a major axis of the delivery system when the sheath has been retracted sufficient to expose the bare stent.
The method to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm can further include the step of cannulating a second leg of the bifurcated stent with an extension stent graft while the first leg is being held at least partially within the sheath. During cannulation, the leg that is being held is longer than the leg that is being cannulated and, optionally, the cannulated leg is in telescoping relation with the extension stent graft. The cannulated leg can overlap the extension stent graft by at least two stents of each of the cannulated leg and the extension stent graft. The cannulated leg can include at least one more stent than is required to overlap the extension leg by two stents of each of the cannulated leg and the extension stent graft. A stent second from the distal end of the cannulated leg can be within the graft of the bifurcated stent graft. The stent second from the distal end of the bifurcated graft can include barbs that extend inwardly and proximally from the stent.
In another embodiment, the method of treating an abdominal aortic aneurysm can further include the steps of releasing the bifurcated stent graft from the leg clasp, and then detaching a slider and the sheath from the remainder of the delivery device and withdrawing the remainder of the device from the patient while leaving the slider and sheath substantially in place and, optionally, further including the step of delivering a second extension through sheath and to the first leg and cannulating the first leg with the second extension. The cannulated second leg can overlap the extension stent graft by at least two stents of each of the cannulated first leg and the second extension. The cannulated first leg can include at least one more stent than is required to overlap the extension leg by two stents of each of the cannulated first leg and the second extension. A stent second from the distal end of the cannulated first leg can be within the graft of the bifurcated stent graft. The stent second from the distal end of the bifurcated graft includes barbs that can extend inwardly and proximally from the stent.
The methods of the invention have an advantage of repositioning of a graft (e.g., bifurcated graft, second stent graft, third stent graft) if, for example, a clinician determines initial positioning of the graft is less than optimal. The graft can be repositioned at its proximal and distal end and proximally and distally in an aorta or branch of an aorta, such as a common iliac artery.
Alternative to the exemplary tubular structure shown in
In contrast to the bare stent crimp hooks above,
It is noted that providing barbs or hooks on the bare stent of the stent graft (tube or bifurcated) increases the possibility of disadvantageous puncture or scraping, whether to the outer sheath or to the interior of the vessel wall. In particular, with regard to the stent embodiments of
In one exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment where infra-renal barbs of the stent graft are not desired, they can be moved higher on the bare stent so that they can be covered by the fabric strips of the umbrella 11400.
The teachings of all patents, published applications and references cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. The teaching of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/884,136; 10/784,462; 11/348,176; 11/699,701; 11/699,700; 11/700,609; 11/449,337; 11/353,927; 11/701,867; 11/449,337; 11/700,510; 11/701,876; 11/828,653; 11/828,675; and Ser. No. 12/137,592 are also incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/459,387, filed on Jun. 30, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,364,314, issued Jun. 14, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/077,031, filed on Jun. 30, 2008, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/164,545, filed on Mar. 30, 2009. The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3416531 | Edwards | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3485234 | Stevens | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3502069 | Silverman | Mar 1970 | A |
| 3868956 | Alfidi et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 4351333 | Lazarus et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4425919 | Alston, Jr. et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4487808 | Lambert | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4515593 | Norton | May 1985 | A |
| 4516972 | Samson | May 1985 | A |
| 4534363 | Gold | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4572186 | Gould et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4634432 | Kocak | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4655771 | Wallsten | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4665906 | Jervis | May 1987 | A |
| 4665918 | Garza et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4705511 | Kocak | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4787899 | Lazarus | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4817613 | Jaraczewski et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4990151 | Wallstén et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5019057 | Truckai | May 1991 | A |
| 5041126 | Gianturco | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057092 | Webster, Jr. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067957 | Jervis | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5104399 | Lazarus | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5154701 | Cheer et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5158543 | Lazarus | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5176652 | Littrell | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5176660 | Truckai | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5201757 | Heyn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5254105 | Haaga | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290295 | Querals et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292331 | Boneau | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5306263 | Voda | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5324306 | Makower et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334164 | Guy et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5334168 | Hemmer | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5338295 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342384 | Sugarbaker | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5358493 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5380304 | Parker | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387235 | Chuter | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5397345 | Lazarus | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405377 | Cragg | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5415664 | Pinchuk | May 1995 | A |
| 5433723 | Lindenberg et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464449 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474563 | Myler | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489295 | Piplani et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5507771 | Gianturco | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5522881 | Lentz | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5522882 | Gaterud et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531715 | Engelson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5533987 | Pray et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534007 | St. Germain et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540712 | Kleshinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545210 | Hess et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549565 | Ryan et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5562726 | Chuter | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5562728 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569218 | Berg | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571135 | Fraser et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575816 | Rudnick et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575817 | Martin | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582614 | Feingold | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591194 | Berthiaume | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597378 | Jervis | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601568 | Chevillon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607442 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609625 | Piplani et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609627 | Goicoechea et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613974 | Andreas et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618270 | Orejola | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5628754 | Shevlin et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5628783 | Quiachon et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632763 | Glastra | May 1997 | A |
| 5639278 | Dereume et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5658263 | Dang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662675 | Polanskyj Stockert et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5662700 | Lazarus | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674208 | Berg et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5676696 | Marcade | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683449 | Marcade | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693086 | Goicoechea et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700269 | Pinchuk et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707376 | Kavteladze et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5709703 | Lukic et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5713917 | Leonhardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5716365 | Goicoechea et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5716393 | Lindenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720776 | Chuter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723003 | Winston et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730733 | Mortier et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733267 | Del Toro | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735859 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749921 | Lenker et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5755778 | Kleshinski | May 1998 | A |
| 5776142 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782811 | Samson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782904 | White et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782909 | Quiachon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788707 | Del Toro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792144 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800515 | Nadal et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5800517 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5800520 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824036 | Lauterjung | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824037 | Fogarty et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824039 | Piplani et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824040 | Cox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824042 | Lombardi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824044 | Quiachon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5843158 | Lenker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843160 | Rhodes | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843164 | Frantzen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843167 | Dwyer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851228 | Pinheiro | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5860998 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5871536 | Lazarus | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5891110 | Larson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891114 | Chien et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5893868 | Hanson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899892 | Mortier et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902334 | Dwyer et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904713 | Leschinsky | May 1999 | A |
| 5906619 | Olson et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5910101 | Andrews et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911715 | Berg et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916263 | Goicoechea et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5938696 | Goicoechea et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944726 | Blaeser et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947939 | Mortier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951495 | Berg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954651 | Berg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957949 | Leonhardt et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5961511 | Mortier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5968069 | Dusbabek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5984955 | Wisselink | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993481 | Marcade et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004310 | Bardsley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6004328 | Solar | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6004347 | McNamara et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6019778 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024763 | Lenker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039749 | Marin et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039758 | Quiachon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039759 | Carpentier et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045557 | White et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6051020 | Goicoechea et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053943 | Edwin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6063112 | Sgro | May 2000 | A |
| 6071307 | Rhee et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6099548 | Taheri | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099558 | White et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099559 | Nolting | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110191 | Dehdashtian et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110198 | Fogarty et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6117167 | Goicoechea et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120480 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123723 | Konya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6152944 | Holman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165163 | Chien et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165213 | Goicoechea et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168616 | Brown, III | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6168623 | Fogarty et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183481 | Lee et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6183505 | Mohn, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6183506 | Penn et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193705 | Mortier et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200336 | Pavcnik et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200339 | Leschinsky et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203550 | Olson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6203568 | Lombardi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210435 | Piplani et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6212422 | Berg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6213976 | Trerotola | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214038 | Piplani et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221079 | Magovern et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221102 | Baker et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224609 | Ressemann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228063 | Aboul-Hosn | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231601 | Myers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6238430 | Klumb et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245052 | Orth et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248112 | Gambale et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248116 | Chevillon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251132 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254609 | Vrba et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267775 | Clerc et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270521 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273909 | Kugler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280466 | Kugler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280467 | Leonhardt | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6285903 | Rosenthal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287315 | Wijeratne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6302906 | Goicoechea et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6302907 | Hijlkema | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306141 | Jervis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6312458 | Golds | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319275 | Lashinski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319278 | Quinn | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322585 | Khosravi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6334869 | Leonhardt et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338709 | Geoffrion et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342066 | Toro et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6344044 | Fulkerson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6344052 | Greenan et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6346118 | Baker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6350278 | Lenker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6355056 | Pinheiro | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6355060 | Lenker et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6368345 | Dehdashtian et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6375675 | Dehdashtian et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6375676 | Cox | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379372 | Dehdashtian et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6389946 | Frid et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395017 | Dwyer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6395022 | Piplani et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402781 | Langberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416490 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6416542 | Marcade et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6419686 | McLeod et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425898 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6443979 | Stalker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6443980 | Wang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450988 | Bradshaw | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451053 | Dehdashtian et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454796 | Barkman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458867 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464684 | Galdonik | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6464719 | Jayaraman | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6464721 | Marcade et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478818 | Taheri | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488700 | Klumb et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6503274 | Howanec, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6505066 | Berg et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6514282 | Inoue | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6517571 | Brauker et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6517572 | Kugler et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6517573 | Pollock et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520951 | Carrillo, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520986 | Martin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6524335 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524336 | Papazolgou et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6533753 | Haarstad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540698 | Ishii | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6540778 | Quiachon et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6551350 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6562022 | Hoste et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565596 | White et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565597 | Fearnot et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575994 | Marin et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6576007 | Dehdashtian et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582458 | White et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6582460 | Cryer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6592526 | Lenker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6613073 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6616626 | Crank et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6620126 | Unsworth et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6641606 | Ouriel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6652571 | White et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652572 | Kugler et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6660033 | Marcade et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676666 | Vrba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682536 | Vardi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682537 | Ouriel et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682557 | Quiachon et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6685736 | White et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6689152 | Balceta et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6689158 | White et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6692458 | Forman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692483 | Vardi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692512 | Jang | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695875 | Stelter et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6706033 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6726712 | Raeder-Devens et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6733519 | Lashinski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733523 | Shaolian et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6755856 | Fierens et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6761731 | Majercak | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6790222 | Kugler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6802860 | Cosgrove et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808529 | Fulkerson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6811559 | Thornton | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6814748 | Baker et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6821291 | Bolea et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6827710 | Mooney et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6827711 | Sunseri | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6830575 | Stenzel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6843803 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6849084 | Rabkin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6849088 | Dehdashtian et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858034 | Hijlkema et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6859986 | Jackson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6860901 | Baker et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6863668 | Gillespie et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866660 | Garabedian et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866669 | Buzzard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6871085 | Sommer | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6884260 | Kugler et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6890348 | Sydney et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6911039 | Shiu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6916335 | Kanji | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918925 | Tehrani | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6932829 | Majercak | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6938646 | Litton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6939371 | Kugler et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945989 | Betelia et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6945990 | Greenan | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6964679 | Marcade et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6984244 | Perez et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6989024 | Hebert et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994722 | DiCarlo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7001420 | Speck et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011647 | Purdy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014653 | Ouriel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025773 | Gittings et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7052511 | Weldon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7070582 | Freyman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7105016 | Shiu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112217 | Kugler et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7115134 | Chambers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125419 | Sequin et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7147657 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147660 | Chobotov et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7160318 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7163552 | Diaz | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166125 | Baker et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7169170 | Widenhouse | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7195639 | Quiachon et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7225518 | Eidenschink et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7238197 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7264632 | Wright et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7294147 | Hartley | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7351256 | Hojeibane et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7451765 | Adler | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7708771 | Chuter | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7717950 | Greenan | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7722663 | Austin | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7763063 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7766962 | Quinn | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7780716 | Pappas et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7794489 | Shumer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7799065 | Pappas | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7837724 | Keeble et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 8043354 | Greenberg et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8062345 | Ouellette et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062349 | Moore et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8070790 | Berra et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8083792 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8206427 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8241346 | Chobotov | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8292943 | Berra et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8308790 | Arbefeuille et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8317854 | Ryan et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
| 8449595 | Ouellette et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8500792 | Berra | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8579963 | Tabor | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8636788 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8672992 | On | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8702787 | Arbefeuille | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8734501 | Hartley et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740963 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8998970 | Arbefeuille et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9101506 | Arbefeuille et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9173755 | Berra et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9198786 | Moore et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220617 | Berra | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9320631 | Moore et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9333104 | Ouellette et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9364314 | Berra et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9408734 | Arbefeuille et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9408735 | Arbefeuille et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9439751 | White et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9554929 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9561124 | Arbefeuille et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9592112 | Arbefeuille et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9655712 | Berra et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9827123 | Arbefeuille et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9877857 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9907686 | Ouellette et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9913743 | Arbefeuille et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9925080 | Arbefeuille et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 20010000801 | Miller et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010001833 | Ravenscroft et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034549 | Bartholf et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049547 | Moore | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053930 | Kugler | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020007193 | Tanner et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020013617 | Matsutani et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016597 | Dwyer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020016627 | Golds | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035394 | Fierens | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045929 | Diaz | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052643 | Wholey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052660 | Greenhalgh | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072755 | Bigus et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082523 | Kinsella et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082674 | Anson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091439 | Baker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095140 | Lootz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107561 | Pinheiro | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020108621 | Berg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138133 | Lenz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156518 | Tehrani | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156522 | Ivancev et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161424 | Rapacki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165554 | Dworschak et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188344 | Bolea | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198587 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030028237 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074049 | Hoganson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083734 | Friedrich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088305 | Van Schie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114910 | Juhani Laakso et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120263 | Ouriel | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030120333 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135259 | Simso | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135269 | Swanstrom | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139803 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163193 | Widenhouse | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176911 | Iancea et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176912 | Chuter et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191516 | Weldon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195614 | Ryan et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199966 | Shiu et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199967 | Hartley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199973 | Chuter et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212431 | Brady et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220682 | Kujawski | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233140 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236564 | Majercak | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030236565 | DiMatteo et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040073284 | Bates et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040073289 | Hartley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040093063 | Wright et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098084 | Hartley et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106974 | Greenberg et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117003 | Ouriel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148007 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148009 | Buzzard et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193141 | Leopold et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193244 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193245 | Deem et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193252 | Perez | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199240 | Dorn et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210194 | Bonnette et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230284 | Headley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230286 | Moore et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236403 | Leonhardt et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236407 | Fierens et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267281 | Harari et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021125 | Stack et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050027305 | Shiu et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033406 | Barnhart et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038495 | Greenan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049667 | Arbefeuille et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049674 | Berra et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060016 | Wu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080476 | Gunderson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050080477 | Sydney et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050085789 | Khan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050107862 | Ohlenschlaeger | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149166 | Schaeffer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159803 | Lad et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159804 | Lad et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171597 | Boatman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171598 | Schaeffer | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177222 | Mead | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183259 | Eidenschink et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050192659 | Dahl et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222668 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050283223 | Greenan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050288764 | Snow et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004433 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020319 | Kim et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060020320 | Shaolian et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058864 | Schaeffer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060127439 | Mattes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129169 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129224 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060135961 | Rosenman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178726 | Douglas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178733 | Pinchuk et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188408 | Arbefeuille | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195172 | Luo et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200110 | Lentz et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060212105 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265047 | Dorn | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060276872 | Arbefeuille et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282150 | Olson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021822 | Boatman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070048348 | Atanasoska et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053952 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055338 | Dorn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055340 | Pryor | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055341 | Edoga et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055345 | Arbefeuille | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055347 | Arbefeuille | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070083252 | McDonald | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100422 | Shumer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100425 | Sequin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123972 | Greenberg et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135818 | Moore et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070135889 | Moore et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142894 | Moore et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156228 | Majercak et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162109 | Davila et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070163668 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070168014 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173929 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179592 | Schaeffer | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179593 | Fierens et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070179601 | Fierens et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070198078 | Berra et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203566 | Arbefeuille et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207186 | Scanlon et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213800 | Fierens et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219620 | Eells et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070244545 | Birdsall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021538 | Wright et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027528 | Jagger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080046065 | Hartley et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065011 | Marchand et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071343 | Mayberry et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077226 | Ouellette et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077227 | Ouellette et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080082158 | Tseng et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080114441 | Rust et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080132996 | Drasler et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080157017 | Macatangay et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172122 | Mayberry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195191 | Luo et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208175 | Beckman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262590 | Murray | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264102 | Berra | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269865 | Snow et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090163951 | Simmons et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254165 | Tabor et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100030255 | Berra et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030318 | Berra | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049313 | Alon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234932 | Arbefeuille et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100274340 | Hartley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110054405 | Whiting et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071614 | Majercak | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087318 | Daugherty et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110208288 | Arbefeuille et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218607 | Arbefeuille et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251664 | Acosta de Acevedo | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307049 | Kao | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313503 | Berra et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120022636 | Chobotov | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123517 | Ouellette et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120123528 | Knippel et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143305 | Berra et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296413 | Arbefeuille et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130274856 | Arbefeuille et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289693 | Maggard et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130325099 | Berra | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331924 | Ouellette et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140039597 | Arbefeuille et al. | Feb 2014 | A9 |
| 20140135890 | Berra | May 2014 | A9 |
| 20140135892 | Arbefeuille et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140135896 | Arbefeuille et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148890 | Ouellette et al. | May 2014 | A9 |
| 20140243952 | Parodi et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277340 | White et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140288627 | Ouellette et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316510 | Berra | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150173922 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150202066 | Berra et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150202068 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272755 | Arbefeuille et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160045350 | Berra et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160081787 | Parodi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160270901 | Berra et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310301 | Moore et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338867 | White et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170000600 | Berra et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100232 | Arbefeuille et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100271 | Arbefeuille et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170135807 | Arbefeuille et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170151076 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2017 | A9 |
| 20170165090 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170165091 | Arbefeuille et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281332 | Lostetter | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281382 | Lostetter | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340433 | Berra | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170340462 | Lostetter | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180071123 | Arbefeuille | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2451136 | Oct 2001 | CN |
| 2518466 | Oct 2002 | CN |
| 197 53 123 | Aug 1999 | DE |
| 10 2006 053748 | Apr 2008 | DE |
| 0 510 851 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0 873 733 | Oct 1998 | EP |
| 0 960 607 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 0 696 447 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 990 426 | Apr 2000 | EP |
| 1 177 779 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1 302 178 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1 358 903 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 369 098 | Dec 2003 | EP |
| 1 522 277 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 772 120 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 1 923 024 | May 2008 | EP |
| 1 929 979 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 1 440 673 | Sep 2008 | EP |
| 1 982 677 | Oct 2008 | EP |
| 1 508 313 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 3 040 058 | Jul 2016 | EP |
| 2 714 816 | Jul 1995 | FR |
| 2 722 678 | Jan 1996 | FR |
| 2 779 939 | Dec 1999 | FR |
| WO 9523008 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9609013 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO 9623455 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| WO 9631174 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9638101 | Dec 1996 | WO |
| WO 9710778 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 9733532 | Sep 1997 | WO |
| WO 9820811 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9823242 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9842276 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9853761 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 9925273 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9937242 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO 9965420 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0002615 | Jan 2000 | WO |
| WO 0030562 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0078248 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0117602 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0121102 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0228316 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 03015662 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004000169 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004002370 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004071352 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005023149 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005034808 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005058409 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005067819 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005081936 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005112821 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006019551 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006088638 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006125382 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007008533 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007028086 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007092276 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007123956 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008031103 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008098252 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009023221 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| 2008066923 | Jun 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009124124 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010005524 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010042950 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010105195 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2013154749 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014149022 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,055, dated Jan. 11, 2017. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,808, dated Jul. 1, 2016. |
| Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,055, dated Jul. 12, 2017. |
| Criado, F.J., “EVAR at 20: The Unfolding of a Revolutionary New Technique That Changed Everything,” J. Endovasc. Ther., 17:789-796 (2010). |
| Parodi, J.C., et al., “Transfemoral Intraluminal Graft Implantation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” Ann. Vasc. Surg., 5:491-499 (1991). |
| Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion or the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/003896, dated Jan. 12, 2010. |
| Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2009/003896; dated Jan. 13, 2011. |
| Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, International Application No. PCT/US2013/032396, entitled: “Hemostasis Valve and Delivery Systems”, dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,808, dated Sep. 18, 2015. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387, dated Jul. 11, 2012. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387, dated Mar. 14, 2013. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387, dated Jan. 6, 2014. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387; dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387; dated Oct. 30, 2015. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387, dated Apr. 19, 2016. |
| Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 12/459,387, dated May 3, 2016. |
| Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,055, entitled: “Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systems and Methods of Use,” dated Jan. 16, 2018 (17 pgs). |
| Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,055, dated Jul. 31, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160270936 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61077031 | Jun 2008 | US | |
| 61164545 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12459387 | Jun 2009 | US |
| Child | 15166818 | US |
